Emerald Care Center Midwest
2900 Parklawn Drive, Midwest City, OK 73110 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 116 certified beds · (405) 737-6601 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (36) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $4,017 in federal fines (most recent 2024-04-19)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (64%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 12.0% | 13.6% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.9% | 3.3% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.5% | 1.9% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 2.8% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 3.4% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.7% | 4.7% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 21.7% | 13.7% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 22.2% | 25.7% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 38.5% | 94.6% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.8% | 4.7% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 17.3% | 17.1% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 20.5% | 17.5% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.6% | 1.8% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 18.6% | 74.1% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 26.1% | 27.3% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 18.5% | 16.6% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.94 | 2.31 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.19 | 2.96 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
53.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 206 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 26.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 72 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.40 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 68% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 53.3%CMS range 46.2–58.5 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.8%CMS range 9.1–16.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 26.4% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 26.4% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 26.4% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 98.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 6.2% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.0%CMS range 4.5–10.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.96 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 116 beds and averages 60.4 residents a day — about 52% occupied, or roughly 56 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.71 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.32 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.30 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.45 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.81 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.38 to 0.17 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 64% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
36 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · F2026-06-15 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — widespreadHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents had access to the grievance procedure and file an anonymous grievance.The DON identified 61 residents resided in the facility.Findings:On 06/10/26 at 4:11 p.m., a tour of the facility was completed. There was no information regarding the facility's grievance procedure or location of grievance forms.On 06/15/26 at 9:44 a.m., CNA #1 with the DON's assistance located grievance forms in the copier room in an open cabinet on the wall by the DON's office.On 06/15/26 at 9:54 a.m., grievance forms were located in a file cabinet at the nurse's station. The cabinet had other facility forms. There was no information to show the grievance forms were located in the file cabinet. A policy titled Grievance Policy, dated 01/2024, read in part, The facility will inform residents orally and in writing of their right to make Complaints and Grievances and the process to do so during admission, readmission and the care planning process.On 06/15/26 at 9:45 a.m., the DON stated the copier room was not locked and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to:a. develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan, andb. include the resident and/or representative for care planning for 1 (#3) of 11 sampled residents whose care plans were reviewed.The administrator identified 61 residents resided in the facility.Findings:A policy titled Care Plan Process, revised 09/2019, read in part, When a resident is discharge return not anticipated, returns at a later date, the care plan must be re-written, and the dates must change.Every effort will be made to involve the resident and family or responsible party in the development, implementation, maintenance, and evaluation of the resident plan of care.A minimum data set entry for Resident #3, dated 03/27/26, was completed for Discharge Return Not Anticipated. A comprehensive care plan for Resident #3, dated 02/20/26, was canceled on 04/09/26 due to the resident's discharge.A minimum data set entry for Resident #3, dated 04/13/26, showed the resident was readmitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent an elopement for 1 (#6) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for elopement. The DON identified two residents at high risk for elopement. Findings:A care plan for Resident #6, dated 11/01/24, showed the resident was an elopement risk. Interventions shown for elopement were to distract the resident from wandering by offering pleasant diversions, structured activities, food, conversation, television and or a book. A quarterly comprehensive assessment for Resident #6, dated 06/17/25, showed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of dementia. The assessment showed Resident #6 had a brief interview for mental status score of 1, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. An incident report, dated 07/01/25, read in part, [Resident #6] was observed by a visitor sitting in the facility's south parking lot in a wheelchair. The visitor alerted staff of [Resident #6's] where abouts, the staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-15 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to administer intravenous medication as ordered for 1 (#2) of 4 sampled residents reviewed for medication administration.The DON identified 61 residents resided in the facility and one resident received intravenous medication.Findings:A policy titled Medication Administration and General Guidelines, dated 2021, read in part, Medications are administered as prescribed.A physician's order for Resident #2, dated 06/05/26, showed ampicillin sodium (antibiotic medication) injection. Use two grams intravenously every six hours due to cellulitis for 10 Days.A 06/2026 treatment administration record showed the 12:00 p.m. dose of ampicillin was not administered on the 06/06/26. The record showed to see nurse's notes.A nursing note for Resident #2, dated 06/06/26 at 6:23 p.m., showed the ampicillin order was on the medication administration record but then switched to the treatment administration record.On 06/10/26 at 6:44 p.m., LPN #2 stated they did not administer the intravenous ampicillin medication because it did not alert the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-15 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide laboratory services as ordered by a physician for 1 (#1) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for laboratory services. The DON identified 61 residents resided in the facility. Findings:A facility policy titled Laboratory Services and Reporting, revised 02/03/23, read in part, The facility must provide or obtain laboratory services when ordered by a physician, physician assistant, nurse practitioner, or clinical nurse specialist in accordance with state law.A physician's order for Resident #1, dated 05/28/26, showed the resident was to have a CBC and CMP drawn weekly on Sundays.A review of Resident #1's electronic medical record did not show any results for a CBC or CMP on (Sunday) 05/31/26 or (Sunday) 06/07/26.An admission assessment for Resident #1, dated 06/04/26, showed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included polycythemia vera (a blood cancer that causes the bone marrow to produce too many red blood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-10 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure assessments were coded accurately for 4 (#19, 23, 25 and #69) of 17 sampled residents whose assessments were reviewed. The administrator reported 68 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. On 04/09/25 at 1:02 p.m., Resident #23 was observed outside smoking without difficulty. Staff supervision was observed during smoke time. Resident #23 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. An undated medical diagnoses list showed diagnoses which included alcohol dependence, HTN, and aphasia. Resident #23's annual assessment, dated 3/15/25, showed the resident's cognition was intact. The assessment showed the resident did not use tobacco. Resident #23's care plan, last revised on 03/26/25, showed the resident smoked. On 04/09/25 at 2:24 p.m., CNA #1 and certified medication aide #1 both reported the Resident #23 smoked. On 04/09/25 2:39 p.m., the MDS coordinator stated the assessment was incorrect and it should have been yes instead of no. 2. Resident #69…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a smoking care plan for 2 (#19 and 25) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for smoking. The DON identified six smokers resided in the facility. Findings: A policy titled Care Plan Process, dated 09/01/19, showed the plan of care must describe the services that were to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and social well-being. The policy showed high-risk areas such as smoking. 1. Resident #19's care plan, dated 03/14/25, showed no smoking interventions. Resident #19's admission assessment, dated 3/17/25, showed the resident's cognition was moderately impaired with a BIMS score of 11. The assessment showed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. A smoking list provided by the DON on 04/08/25 showed Resident #19 was a smoker. On 04/09/25 at 12:50 p.m., Resident #19 reported being a smoker and had smoked…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to evaluate residents for smoking safely for 2 (#19 and #25) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for smoking. The DON reported six residents were smokers. Findings: 1. On 04/08/25 at 1:51 p.m., Resident #19 was in bed wearing oxygen via nasal cannula. The resident's wheelchair was observed with a portable oxygen tank attached to the back of it. A policy titled Resident Smoking, dated 01/01/24, showed all residents would be asked about tobacco use during the admission process and during comprehensive MDS assessments. The policy showed all residents would be evaluated, using the smoking/nicotine devices, to determine adaptive equipment and level of supervision required for smoking or if the resident was safe to smoke. Resident #19's care plan, dated 03/14/25, showed no smoking interventions. Resident #19's admission assessment, dated 3/17/25, showed the resident's cognition was moderately impaired with a BIMS score of 11. The assessment showed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-10 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure No smoking/Oxygen in use signs were posted for 3 (#19, 175, and #176) of 3 residents sampled for respiratory care. The administrator reported 68 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. On 04/08/25 at 1:39 p.m., Resident #175 was observed resting in bed with oxygen on. No oxygen in use sign was observed posted. On 04/09/25 at 1:41 p.m., Resident #175 was observed resting in bed with oxygen on. No oxygen in use sign was posted. An undated medical diagnoses list showed diagnoses which included pneumonia and acute respiratory failure. A facility policy titled Oxygen Administration, dated 09/2024, read in part. Place an Oxygen in Use sign on the outside of the room entrance door. 2. On 04/08/25 at 10:02 a.m., Resident #176 was observed resting in bed with eyes closed and with oxygen on. No oxygen in use sign was posted. On 04/08/25 at 1:36 p.m., Resident #176 was observed resting in bed with eyes closed with oxygen on. No oxygen in use sign was posted. On 04/09/25 at 11:05 a.m., Resident #176 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to use the required PPE for residents on enhanced barrier precautions for 2 (#31 and #50) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for infection control. The DON reported 68 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. On 04/10/25 at 11:12 a.m., LPN #2 was observed providing wound care to Resident #31's upper spine. The wound was observed to be open. LPN #2 was observed their washing hands and donning gloves before starting the wound care. LPN #2 was not observed donning a gown required for enhanced barrier precautions. A MDRO [multi drug resistant organism] PPE-Enhanced Barrier Precautions policy, dated 03/01/24, showed enhanced barrier precautions were an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms that employed targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities. Resident #31's care plan, dated 12/12/24, showed enhanced barrier precautions and to utilize contact precautions during high contact resident care activities. Resident #31's quarterly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 26 citations
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-10 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — patternMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to have a call system available for resident use in one of three shower rooms observed. The DON reported 68 residents resided in the facility. Findings: On 04/10/25 at 9:40 a.m., the shower room on hall 400 was observed to have one sink, one toilet, and two shower stalls. The shower room had no call system available. On 04/10/25 at 9:57 a.m., CNA #2, checked the shower room on hall 400 and reported no call system was available. On 04/10/25 at 11:46 a.m., the maintenance supervisor reported they were unaware the shower room on the 400 hall did not have a call system. The maintenance supervisor reported the shower room should have a call system available for residents to call for assistance.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-10 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the exterior building was maintained in good repair. The administrator identified 68 residents resided in the facility. Findings: On 04/10/25 at 9:55 a.m. through 10:10 a.m., a tour of the outside was conducted. There were 25 areas of rotted soffit boards and peeling paint around the whole parameter of the building. The undated facility Maintenance Manager job description, read in part, The primary purpose of the job description is to plan, organize, develop, and direct the general and preventative maintenance of the physical plant and grounds. On 04/10/25 11:39 a.m., the administrator stated the job description was all the facility had. The administrator stated they did not make rounds outside except on the patio and they were not aware of all the areas of rotted soffit boards. On 04/10/25 11:44 a.m., the maintance director stated they walked around the facility daily. They stated they had put requests into corporate to have the soffits fixed since they had been employed three years ago. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an order for pain medication was submitted to the pharmacy in a timely manner for 1 (#1) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for having pain medications ordered in a timely manner. The administrator identified 65 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included status post thrombectomy of right superficial femoral, profunda femoral, and popliteal arteries. A physician's order, dated 01/23/25, showed Resident #1 was to receive hydrocodone/APAP (pain medication) tab 5-325 mg one tab every four hours as needed for complaints of pain. On 01/30/25 at 9:07 a.m., Resident #1 reported the facility took two days after they were admitted to get anything stronger than Tylenol (pain reliever) for complaints of pain. On 01/30/25 at 9:20 a.m., certified medication aide #1 stated Resident #1 received an order for a narcotic pain medication on 01/23/25, but they were not sure why it took…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-15 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure: a. incident reports involving residents were accessible to the SA for two (#1 and #7); and b. resident records were complete and accurate for two (#1 and #7) of three sampled residents reviewed for falls. The wound care nurse identified 57 residents resided in the facility. The Incidents by Incident Type reports, dated 11/14/24, documented 30 residents experienced a fall for the months of September, October, and November 2024. Findings: An Accidents and Incidents policy, dated 01/24, read in part, Accidents/incidents may include .Fall .A thorough investigation and follow-up will be completed within five working days. A summary of the accident/incident will be documented .Accident/incident will have documentation initiated by the individual witnessing, made aware of or involved in the occurrence as soon as discovered or reported. An Incident investigation is not punitive in nature, but simply an accurate, objective account of an occurrence…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide evidence a resident representative was notified after the resident experienced a fall for one (#7) of three sampled residents reviewed for falls. The wound care nurse identified 57 residents resided in the facility. The Incidents by Incident Type reports, dated 11/14/24, documented 30 residents experienced a fall for the months of September, October, and November 2024. Findings: A Notification of Changes policy, dated 01/24, read in part, It is the policy of this facility that changes in a resident's condition or treatment are immediately shared with the resident and/or representative .When a resident is mentally competent, his or her designated resident representative or family, as appropriate, should be notified of significant changes in the resident's health status because the resident may not be able to notify them personally, especially in the case of sudden illness or accident .Requirements for notification of resident, the resident representative, their physician .An accident involving the resident, which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-14 · tag F0660 — isolatedPlan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's critical post discharge medical equipment was ordered and received in a timely manner for one (#1) of two sampled residents whose discharge planning process was reviewed. The DON identified 65 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #1 was admitted to facility on 04/17/24 with diagnoses that included Parkinsonism, traumatic subdural hematoma, and depression. A 'Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage', was signed by Resident #1 on 04/29/24. A Nursing Progress Note, written 05/02/24, documented Resident #1 was discharged home with family. A Physician's Progress Note, submitted to the DME company, read in parts, .Without a wheelchair, the patient has a higher risk of morbidity or mortality in [their] attempts to complete [their] MRADLs . It was not signed by NP #1 nor submitted to the DME company until 05/09/24. A prescription for billing and dispensing of a standard wheelchair for Resident #1 was not signed by NP #1 nor submitted to the DME company until 05/09/24. There was no documentation in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to administer medications and treatments in a timely manner for two (#4 and #5) of six residents reviewed for receiving medications and treatments for scabies. The DON identified 65 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. A Physician's Order for Resident #4, dated 05/29/24, read in parts, .Ivermectin Oral Tablet 3mg .give 7 tablets by mouth one time only for rash . Pharmacy Manifest #2761767, dated 05/31/24, documented Ivermectin 3mg tabs (7 tabs) were delivered to the facility on [DATE] at 7:20 p.m. and received by LPN #1. A printout of the medication administration history for Resident #4 documented Ivermectin 3mg tabs (7 tabs) were not administered until 06/06/24 at 3:58 p.m. There was a lapse of 140.25 hours (5 days and 20.25 hours) between the time Resident #4's medication was delivered to the facility and when it was administered. 2. A Physician's Order for Resident #5, dated 06/11/24, read in parts, .Permethrin External Cream 5% .Apply to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-14 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to administer treatment as ordered for one (#5) of six sampled residents reviewed for receiving medication or treatment for scabies. The DON identified 65 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Physician's Order, dated 06/11/24, read in parts, .Permethrin External Cream 5% .Apply to body-neck down topically one time only for rash for 2 Days .leave on for 8 hours and then shower . June 2024 MAR documented Permethrin Cream 5% was administered on 06/13/24 at 1:38 a.m. On 06/14/24 at 9:20 a.m., Resident #5 was asked if Permethrin Cream 5% had been applied to their body for a second time during the previous night and if they had been showered this am. Resident #5 stated, No, they only did it that one time. Resident #5 was asked if they still had itching or a rash. They stated yes and showed left arm and left chest to this surveyor. Several red, raised areas were observed on Resident #5's left arm and chest. On 06/14/24 at 9:28 a.m., CNA #1 was asked if Resident #5 had received a shower this morning to remove medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-19 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — patternImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff notified the physician of a resident with an ongoing rash and no treatment prescribed for one (#6) of six residents reviewed for infection control. The Administrator identified 59 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Notification of Changes Policy, dated 01/2024, read in part, .Nurses and other care staff are educated to identify changes in a resident's status and define changes that require notification of the resident and/or their representative, and the resident's physician, to ensure the best outcomes of care for the resident . Resident #6 had diagnoses which included dementia, high blood pressure and dermatitis. A nurse progress note, dated 01/02/24 at 7:01 p.m., read in part .Resident noted to have rashes all over the body which were gotten worse with resident constantly scratching d/t itchiness. PCP was notified .new order for Clobetasol cream to be applied for 14 days twice a day . The January 2024 TAR documented Resident #6 was treated with the Clobetasol cream from 01/03/24 through…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement their infection control policy for surveillance of scabies for four (#3, 4, 5 and #36) of six sampled residents reviewed for infection control. The Administrator identified 59 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An Infection Control-surveilance for infection policy, revised 01/2024, read in part .The Infectionist Preventionist will conduct ongoing surveillance for Healthcare-Associated Infections .that have substantial impact on potential resident outcome and that may require transmission based precautions and other preventative interventions .Infections that include routine surveillance include those with .Pathogens associated with serious outbreaks .scabies . 1. Resident #3 had diagnoses which included congestive heart failure and sarcopenia. A Derm Visit note, dated 02/05/24, read in part .Rash located on [the residents] Upper body;scalp;neck for several months. Scabies vs atopic derm vs other .Rash: located on upper body;arms .Will treat as scabies . 2. Resident #4 had diagnoses which included, type…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-07 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy for three (#4, 13, and #14) of four sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The DON identified 63 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An Abuse policy, dated 01/2024, documented residents must not be subject to abuse by anyone. It documented, in response to abuse, the facility must report it immediately to the Administrator, other officials in accordance with State law, and State Survey and Certification agency. It documented, when suspicion of abuse occurs, an investigation is immediately conducted. 1. Resident #4 had diagnoses which included anxiety disorder. An Annual assessment, dated 08/21/23, documented Resident #4's cognition was intact. A Witness Statement, dated 11/07/23, documented Resident #4 told CNA #5 on 11/06/23 a staff member yelled at Resident #4 on 11/03/23. A Resolution Form, dated 02/15/24, documented Resident #4 reported the housekeeping supervisor was verbally abusive. The resolution from staff read in part, .All residents .who were cognitive have been interviewed.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to administer medication as ordered: a. for one (#9) of five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications; and b. for one (#48) of five sampled residents observed during medication pass. The DON identified 64 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The Medication Administration and General Guidelines policy, dated 2021, read in part, .Medications are administered in accordance with written orders of the attending physician .Medications are administered within one hour of the scheduled time . 1. Resident #9 had diagnoses which included hypertension and Dementia. A physician's order, dated 07/20/23, documented Donepezil HCl oral tablet 5 mg give one tablet by mouth at bedtime related to Dementia. A physician's order, dated 07/24/23, documented metoprolol tartrate oral tablet give 12.5 mg by mouth two times a day related to hypertension. The October 2023 medication administration record documented; a. Donepezil HCl 5mg had no notation or waiting on pharmacy on 10/10/23, 10/21/23, 10/22/23, 10/23/23,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-12-13 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a significant medication error did not occur for one (#9) of five sampled residents for unnecessary medication regimen review. The DON identified 64 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The Medication Administration and General Guidelines policy, dated 2021, read in part, .Medications are administered in accordance with written orders of the attending physician . The Medication Discrepancies and Adverse Medication Reactions policy, dated 2021, read in part, .Medication Discrepancy .It is also an omission of an ordered medication due to prescribing, dispensing, or administering error . Resident #9 had diagnoses which included chronic atrial fibrillation, chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure, hypertension, and acute embolism and thrombosis of unspecified deep veins of unspecified lower extremity. Physician's orders, dated 07/20/23, documented the following medications: a. Eliquis (anticoagulant) 5 mg two times a day for chronic atrial fibrillation, and b. furosemide (diuretic) 20 mg one…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure: a. the ice machine was in sanitary condition in accordance with professional standards for food safety and service for one of two ice machines observed; and b. food was handled under sanitary conditions in accordance with professional standards for food safety and service for one of one kitchen observations. The DON identified 63 residents received nutritional services from the kitchen in the facility. Findings: An undated Equipment food-contact surfaces and utensils facility policy, read in part, .equipment food-contact surfaces and utensils shall be cleaned and sanitized .at a frequency necessary to preclude accumulation of soil or mold . An undated Gloves, use limitation facility policy, read in part, .single use gloves shall be used for only one task .and discarded when damaged or soiled, or when interruptions occur in the operation . On 12/11/23 at 8:38 a.m., the ice machine in the dining room was observed to be dripping water, with a white substance all over the dispense funnel, drainage panel…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-13 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete pre-employment screening for history of abuse and neglect per their abuse policy for one (housekeeping and laundry supervisor) of five employee files reviewed. The current employee list, undated, documented 97 facility employees. Findings: The facility's Abuse Protection policy, revised on 05/03/22, read in part, .It is the policy of the facility to ensure residents are free from abuse .The resident has the right to be free from verbal, sexual, physical, and mental abuse, corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, neglect, and misappropriation of property .Our facility conducts employee background checks .Screening-Protocols for conducting employment background checks: background checks include State Criminal, Federal Criminal .reference checks, OIG check, Sex Offender check, and any other review required under State or Federal regulation . Housekeeping and laundry supervisor had a hire date of 10/02/23. The OK Screen for housekeeping and laundry supervisor was dated 12/13/23. On 12/13/23 at 10:48 a.m., the HRD…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-13 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure nutrition via tube feeding was administered as ordered for one (#55) of five sampled residents observed during medication pass. The DON identified 64 residents resided in the facility and two residents received their nutrition through tube feeding. Findings: The Care and Treatment of Feeding Tubes policy, dated 11/17, read in part, .Feeding tubes will be utilized according to physician orders, which typically include: the kind of feeding and its caloric value, volume, duration, mechanism of administration, and frequency of flush . Resident #55 had diagnoses which included gastrostomy and protein calorie malnutrition. A physician's order, dated 12/08/23, documented enteral feed order every shift for continuous peg feedings glucerna 1.2 at 70 ml per hour with 23 ml per hour flush of water. On 12/12/23 at 12:41 p.m., Resident #55's tube feeding pump setting was observed with glucerna 1.2 at 70 ml per hour and water flush 30 ml every zero hours. The water bag was dated 12/11/23. On 12/12/23 at 12:53 p.m.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-13 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than 5%. A total of 25 opportunities were observed with two errors. The total medication error rate was 8%. The DON identified 64 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The Medication Discrepancies and Adverse Medication Reactions policy, dated 2021, read in part, .Medication Discrepancy .It is also an omission of an ordered medication due to prescribing, dispensing, or administering error . Resident #55 had diagnoses which included hypertension, syncope, and collapse. A physician's order, dated 11/20/23, documented amlodipine Besylate 10 mg give one tablet by mouth one time a day for hypertension hold and notify MD if systolic blood pressure below 100, or diastolic blood pressure below 60, or pulse below 55. A physician's order, dated 11/20/23, documented carvedilol oral tablet 6.25 mg give one tablet by mouth two times a day for hypertension hold and notify MD if systolic blood pressure below 100, or diastolic blood pressure below 60, or pulse below 55. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-13 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolatedEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received a therapeutic diet as ordered for one (#163) of two sampled residents reviewed for nutrition. The DON identified 64 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The facility's Therapeutic Diet Orders policy, dated 11/17, read in part, .To assure residents receive and consume foods in the appropriate form and/or the appropriate nutritive content as prescribed by a physician, and/or assessed by the interdisciplinary team to support the resident's treatment, plan of care, in accordance with his/her goals and preferences .2. Therapeutic diets will be provided to residents in the appropriate nutritive content as prescribed by the physician and/or assessed by the interdisciplinary team to support the treatment and plan of care. Resident #163's diagnosis included Diabetes type II, hyperlipidemia, hypertension and calculus kidney. A Physician Order, dated 12/01/23, documented resident #163 was to receive a consistent carbohydrate controlled diet. On 12/12/23 at 10:11 a.m., during a review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received their bath/shower per schedule for two (#3 and #7) of three sampled residents reviewed for bathing. The ADON identified 54 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The Hall Shower List Form, undated, documented all shower sheets must be filled out and returned to the nurse. It documented all refusals should be brought to the charge nurse to be charted, all showers as well needed to be charted in the electronic record. It documented all showers and refusals would be monitored daily by management. 1. Resident #3 had diagnoses which included cerebral palsy and glaucoma. Resident #3's Care Plan, revised 03/27/23, documented the resident required extensive assistance by staff for bathing. A Quarterly Resident Assessment, dated 09/17/23, documented Resident #3's cognition was intact, and they required extensive two person physical assist for bed mobility and transfers. It documented the task of bathing did not occur and/or non-facility staff provided care 100 percent of the time for the activity…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on oberservation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure: a. proper storage and labeling for food-handling practices; and b. ice and coffee machines were in sanitary conditions with accordance to professional standards for food safety and service. Findings: On 10/11/22 at 11:33a.m., during the brief initial tour of the kitchen it was found that multiple food items were stored in refrigerator unlabeled and undated. The senior cook was asked about the unlabeled and undated items. They replied, This food was supposed to be thrown away and it never was tossed out. On 10/12/22 at 10:23a.m., the Dietary Manager was asked about the policy regarding these unlabeled items. They replied, They are supposed to be labeled and dated/or thrown away. The facility policies, read in part, .b. Educate and Inform i Educate staff, family, residents, visitors and community groups on resident's right to consume food foods not procured by the facility on admission, readmission and as needed. Education on safe food handling will be provided to all staff, family, residents,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-13 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure background checks were conducted for one (CNA#1) of five sampled employees reviewed for background checks. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 10/11/22, documented 66 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The Abuse Protection policy, revised 05/03/22, read in part .Screening-Protocols for conducting employment background checks; background checks include State Criminal, Federal Criminal (if applicable), reference checks .Sex Offender check, and any other review required under State or Federal regulation . On 10/13/22 at 10:15 a.m., the HR director was asked to provide a copy of an OK SCREEN for CNA #1. The HR director stated that CNA #1 did not have one in their file and they had not seen them on OK Screen when they checked. On 10/13/222 at 10:50 a.m., the HR director provided a copy of an OK SCREEN for CNA #1. The OK Screen, dated 10/13/22, documented the screening had been conducted on 10/13/22 at 10:43 a.m. On 10/13/22 at 11:16 a.m., the HR director stated their…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a dependent resident was bathed as scheduled for one (#22) of one sampled resident reviewed for ADLs. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 10/11/22, documented 66 residents resided in the facility and eight residents were dependent for bathing. Findings: Resident #22 admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Alzheimer's disease. ADL bathing records and skin worksheets, reviewed from 08/19/22 through 08/31/22, documented Resident #22 had not been provided bathing two out of four opportunities. A resident assessment, dated 09/01/22, documented Resident #22 required total assistance for bathing. ADL bathing records and skin worksheets, reviewed from 09/01/22 through 09/30/22, documented Resident #22 had not been bathed five out of nine opportunities, and two out of three opportunities in October, 2022. ADL bathing records and skin worksheets, reviewed from 10/01/22 through 10/12/22, documented Resident #22 had not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure physician's orders were followed to obtain weights three times weekly for one (#31) of one sampled residents reviewed for nutrition. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 10/11/22, documented 66 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #31 had diagnoses which included heart failure and chronic kidney disease. A physician's order, dated 03/21/22, documented to weigh the resident three times weekly and notify the physician if there was a 3 pound gain each time or a five pound gain in a week. An August 2022 treatment sheet documented the resident had not been weighed nine out of 13 opportunities. A September 2022 treatment sheet documented the resident had not been weighed six out of 13 opportunities. An October 2022 treatment sheet documented the resident had not been weighed four out of five opportunities. On 10/13/22 at 11:07 a.m., the DON was asked what the policy was for obtaining resident weights. She stated monthly unless otherwise ordered. She was shown the above…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-13 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5 percent. The medication error rate was 7.41 percent. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 10/11/22, documented 66 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A medication administration policy, 2021 edition, documented medications are administered in accordance with written orders of the attending physician. Resident #17 had diagnoses which included personal history of transient ischemic attack (TIA), cerebral infarction, and constipation. A physician's order, dated, 10/06/22, documented to administer MiraLax packet 17 grams, 1 packet by mouth two times a day. A physician's order, dated, 10/11/22, documented to administer Children's aspirin tablet chewable 81 mg one tablet by mouth one time a day. An October 2022 MAR, documented aspirin and MiraLax had not been administered on 10/12/22. It documented to see the nurse notes. On 10/12/22 at 8:06 a.m., CMA #1 informed Resident #17 that their aspirin and Miralax were unavailable. A Note Text…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medication carts were secured for one of one treatment/medication cart observed unlocked. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 10/11/22, documented 66 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A medication storage policy, 2021 edition, documented medication supply is accessible only to the license nursing personnel, pharmacy personnel, or staff members lawfully authorized to administer medications. It documented medication rooms, carts, and medication supplies are locked or attended by persons with authorized access. On 10/11/22 at 11:43 a.m., the hall 200 treatment/medication cart was observed to be unlocked and unattended. There were IV medications, FSBS supplies, ointments, and numerous creams and paste in the cart. On 10/11/22 at 11:47 a.m., LPN #1 approached the treatment/medication cart and locked it. When LPN #1 was asked what the policy for ensuring medications and treatments were secured, they stated, by locking the cart. When asked if the cart was locked when they…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-13 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on oberservation and interview, the facility failed to maintain mechanical and electrical equipment in safe operating condition. Findings: The maintenance supervisor and dietary manager opened the vents to the exhaust fans to witness the electrical equipment that were not in working condition. On 10/12/22 at 10:28 a.m., the dietary manager was asked about the exhaust fans. They stated, Our exhaust fans are not working right now and it was reported to the maintanence supervisior. We have maintanence fans on the kitchen floor and they do have lint on the fan blades.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$4,017 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $4,017 — penalty dated 2024-04-19
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to EMERALD HEALTHCARE — 14 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 1.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 1.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 1.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 2.0 | ≈ chain avg |
The other 13 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.3★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHICKIESTRONG MIDWEST CITY LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 5% | since 03/17/2017 |
| CHAFETZ, YISROEL | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 20% | since 03/17/2017 |
| GAMZEH, DAVID | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | 19% | since 03/17/2017 |
| GLATZER, AKIVA | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | 19% | since 03/17/2017 |
| WALDEN, JACOB | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 17% | since 03/17/2017 |
| BANKERS TRUST COMPANY | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST | — | since 03/17/2017 |
| BATES, MARILYN | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 03/17/2017 |
| SMITH, SUSAN | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 03/17/2017 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OK
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Oklahoma Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 375098. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-10, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.