No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Emerald Care Center Southwest LLC

5600 South Walker, Oklahoma City, OK 73109 · For profit - Individual · 112 certified beds · (405) 632-7771 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (405) 632-7771 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Oct 20241 actual-harm citation$8,278 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Oct 2024
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (43) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $8,278 in federal fines (most recent 2025-04-09)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (66%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
6521 S Western Ave · (405) 632-6693 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
La 2 Ok0.5 mi
1 Se 59th St Ste C · (405) 768-2450 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
415 SW 59th St · (405) 982-6837 · Call to confirm hours
Park
4601 S Walker Ave · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
5716 S Harvey Ct · (405) 631-9607

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased9.7%13.6%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight0.6%3.3%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.5%1.9%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.9%2.8%2.0%typical
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.1%3.4%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.3%4.7%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened8.2%13.7%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication19.1%25.7%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine85.7%94.6%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers10.6%4.7%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control25.6%17.1%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table9.8%17.5%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.9%1.8%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine69.0%74.1%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission24.8%27.3%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit19.7%16.6%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.182.311.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.932.961.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 60 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

51.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
40.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.28U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.09hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.19hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 40.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 72 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 42% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF51.8%CMS range 41.8–64.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.7%CMS range 8.4–16.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge40.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge31.9%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge33.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting97.5%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge92.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened5.3%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.1%CMS range 5.5–11.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.121.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.40
RN hours/ resident / day
0.75
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.18
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.33
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.41
RN hoursweekends
65.8%
Total nursing turnover
42.9%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 112 beds and averages 66.8 residents a day — about 60% occupied, or roughly 45 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.33 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.40 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.18 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.00 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.47 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.40 to 0.41 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 66% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-12-13)
13
at the previous standard inspection (2023-08-18)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

43 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 32 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-04-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a urinalysis order was completed and an antibiotic was transcribed as ordered for 1 (#5) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for care and treatment. The administrator identified 63 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An undated facility policy titled Medication orders, read in part, Written transfer orders (sent with a resident by a hospital or other health care facility): Implement a transfer order without further validation if it is signed and dated by the resident's current attending physician. A policy titled Laboratory Services and Reporting, dated 01/2024, read in part, The facility must provide or obtain laboratory services when ordered by a physician, physician assistant, nurse practitioner, or clinical nurse specialist in accordance with state law .The facility is responsible for the timeliness of the services. Resident #5 had diagnoses which included other symptoms and signs involving cognitive functions following cerebral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete a Nursing admission Data Collection (an assessment used for elopement risk timely for 1 (#1) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for elopement.The administrator identified 71 residents resided in the facility. Findings:A policy for Elopement, Risk reduction strategies and management of missing resident, Wandering Missing Resident, dated 11/2022 and revised 01/2024, showed an elopement risk data collection was to be completed by the nursing staff on all residents at admission, if possible, otherwise no later than eight hours from admission.An undated admission Record showed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] at 11:14 a.m.Resident #1's electronic medical record medical diagnosis section showed the resident was admitted with vascular dementia.A nursing note, dated 12/24/25 at 3:46 p.m., showed Resident #1 was located by the police outside the facility down the road.Resident #1 had eloped from the facility within 4.5 hours of being…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-09 · tag F0694 — pattern
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide care consistent with professional standards of practice and in accordance with physician orders for: a. a PICC line for 1 (#1) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for infection control; and b. the administration of IV fluids for 1 (#12) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for medications as ordered. The DON identified six residents with IV lines resided in the facility. Findings: 1. On 04/02/25 at 2:21 p.m., Resident #1's PICC line dressing was dated 03/20/25. A policy titled Special Needs, dated 01/2024, read in part, To address special needs, this facility will provide the necessary care and treatment, including medical and nursing care, consistent with professional standards of practice and in accordance with physician orders, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals and preferences. This policy pertains to the following needs: parenteral fluids .PICC/IV. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included encounter for orthopedic aftercare following surgical amputation and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-09 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to follow the menu for one of one meal service observed. The DON identified 63 residents who received their meals from the kitchen. Findings: On 04/03/25 at 12:39 p.m., cook #1 was observed to plate four regular plates with each containing three chicken tenders, one scoop of coleslaw, one scoop of mashed potatoes, and one scoop of gravy. On 04/03/25 at 12:44 p.m., cook #1 was observed to plate a mechanical soft diet plate with one scoop grounded chicken tenders, one scoop of mashed potatoes, one scoop of gravy, and one scoop of cooked cabbage. On 04/03/25 at 1:06 p.m., cook #1 was observed to plate a pureed diet plate with one scoop pureed chicken tenders, one scoop mashed potatoes, and two scoops gravy. No pureed vegetables were served on the puree plate. A policy titled Menus and Adequate Nutrition dated 01/2024, read in part, The purpose of this policy is to assure menus are developed and prepared, based on reasonable efforts to meet resident choices and reflect the resident's nutritional, religious,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control was maintained during the provision of incontinent care and PICC line dressing change for 2 (#1 and #9) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for infection control. The administrator identified 63 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. On 04/02/25 at 3:02 p.m., LPN #2 donned a gown, gloves, a mask, and entered Resident #1's room with a PICC line dressing change kit. They instructed Resident #1 to wear a mask. LPN #2 informed the resident they would be changing their PICC line dressing. A staff passing by the resident's room closed the door for privacy. The resident was sitting in their wheelchair. On 04/02/25 at 3:04 p.m., LPN #2 opened the PICC line dressing kit and placed it on the resident's bed. They removed their gloves and donned the sterile gloves from the kit. LPN #2 removed the resident's old PICC line dressing and the PICC line stabilization device. LPN #2 discarded their gloves and donned new gloves they retrieved from their pocket. They cleaned the PICC site with items…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-09 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's: a. emergency contact and physician were notified of a resident's refusal of urine specimen collection for urinalysis for 1 (#5); and b. physician was notified of a resident's low blood sugar as ordered for 1 (#5) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for care and treatment. The administrator identified 63 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A policy titled NOTIFICATION OF CHANGES POLICY, dated 01/2024, read in part, It is the policy of this facility that changes in a resident's condition or treatment are immediately shared with the resident and/or the resident representative, according to their authority, and reported to the attending physician or delegate. Resident #5 had diagnoses which included other symptoms and signs involving cognitive functions following cerebral infarction. A physician's order, dated 11/02/24, showed to notify provider if blood sugar less than 60 or greater than 250 two times a day for diabetes mellitus. Resident #5's admission resident assessment, dated 11/07/24, showed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-09 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a urinalysis order was completed in a timely manner for 1 (#7) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for care and treatment. The administrator identified 63 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A policy titled Laboratory Services and Reporting, dated 01/2024, read in part, The facility must provide or obtain laboratory services when ordered by a physician, physician assistant, nurse practitioner, or clinical nurse specialist in accordance with state law .The facility is responsible for the timeliness of the services. Resident #7 had diagnosis which included neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder. A physician's order, dated 02/18/25, showed urinalysis with culture and sensitivity one time only for lab for one day. A nursing note, dated 02/21/25, read in part, Resident's representative [name withheld] called and stated that resident is being very hateful and accusing everyone of stealing their belongings, [name withheld] informed this nurse that when [Resident #7] does this, it is usually because they has a UTI. This…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed include and update a careplan for one (#27) of eight sampled residents whose careplans were reviewed. The administrator identified 64 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A facility Care Plan Process policy, dated 10/10/21, read in part, The plan of care must describe the services the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and mental, and social well-being .b. High-risk areas such as fall, skin/wounds, pain, safety (i.e., smoking, elopement), and weight loss must be care planned immediately upon identifying risk via evaluation. Resident #27 had diagnoses which included autism. On 12/11/24 at 10:30 a.m., the facility's smoking list was reviewed with the DON. Resident #27 was listed as a smoker. Resident #27's care plan was reviewed and smoking was not included in care plan. On 12/11/24 at 10:32 a.m., the DON reported Resident #27 smoking was not included in the care plan. On 12/11/24 at 10:49 a.m., Resident #27 reported they smoke three to five times…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a smoking assessment was completed for one (#27) of 19 residents sampled for smoking assessments. The DON identified 64 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: A facility's Resident Smoking Policy-Physical Environment policy, dated 01/2024, read in part, 7. Resident who smoke will be evaluated , using the Smoking/Nicotine Devices , to determine adaptive equipment and level of supervision required for smoking, or if residents is safe to smoke at all .15. Documentation to support decision making will be included in the resident's medical record, including but not limited to: b. Assessment of relevant functional and cognitive factors affecting the ability to smoke safely. Resident #27 had a diagnoses which included autism. On 12/11/24 at 10:30 a.m., the facility's smoking list was reviewed with the DON. Resident #27 was listed as a smoker. There was no smoking assessment located in Resident #27's electronic medical record. On 12/11/24 at 10:32 a.m., the DON reported Resident #27 had no smoking assessment. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure: a. the correct inhaler medication was provided to a resident for one (#21) of one sampeld resident reviewed for medication administration; b. medications were administered according to physicians orders for two (#37 and #116); and c. a resident's chart was updated with a new antibiotic order to be continued after an ER visit for one (#116) of two sampled residents reviewed for UTI's. Findings: The administrator identified 64 residents resided in the facility. A Medication Administration and General Guidelines, policy, dated 2021, read in part, Medications are administered in accordance with written orders of the attending physician. The policy also read, Residents are identified before medication is administered. The policy also read, The resident's MAR is initialed by the person administering the medication. The policy also read, The physician must be notified when a dose of medication has not been given. The policy also read, Medications…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a medication cart was securely locked and attended to according to facility policy and procedure. The administrator identified 64 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An undated facility Medication Storage in the Facility policy, read in part, Medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely, and properly following manufacturer's recommendations or those of the supplier. The medication supply is accessible only to licensed nursing personnel, pharmacy personnel, or staff members lawfully authorized to administer medications. On 12/10/24 at 11:43 a.m., the medication cart on the North end of the main lobby was found unlocked and unattended. On 12/10/24 at 11:44 a.m., LPN #2 reported the medication cart should have been locked.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 32 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure: a. hair nets were worn appropriately; b. the kitchen was kept clean and maintained in good repair; c. food items were labeled, dated, and stored according to facility policy; and d. hand washing and glove usage were appropriate. The DON identified 60 residents ate from the kitchen. Findings: A Preventing Foodborne Illness-Employee Hygiene and Sanitary policy, dated 3/20/24, documented food and nutrition service employees would follow appropriate hygiene and sanitary procedures to prevent the spread of foodborne illness. It doucumented employees were to wash their hands after handling soiled equipment or utensils, during food preparation, and as often as necessary to prevent cross contamination when changing tasks. It documented hair nets or caps and/or beard restraints were to be worn to keep hair from contacting exposed food, clean equipment, utensils, and linens. A Food Receiving and Storage policy, revised 3/20/24, documented all foods were to be covered, labeled, and dated. On 12/09/24 at 8:40…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-13 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to follow the antibiotic stewardship policy by ensuring a standardized tool for initiation of antibiotics was completed for the treatment of UTI's for one (#37) of three sampled residents reviewed for UTI's. The administrator identified 64 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Antibiotic Stewardship Policy, dated 01/2024, read in part, The facility will track antibiotic use once ordered. The policy also read, The facility will utilize McGeer and or LOEB Criteria, a practical guide to use in nursing homes. Resident #37 had diagnoses which included congenital occlusion of ureteopelvic junction, hydronephrosis, obstructive and reflux uropathy, crossing vessel, and stricture of ureter. Resident #37's care plan, updated 04/06/24, documented the resident had a nephrostomy tube. The focus documented the resident would have no signs or symptoms of a urinary infection. A physician's order, dated 05/30/24, documented to give Macrobid (antibiotic medication) 100 mg two times a day for UTI for five days. Completed on 06/04/24. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-13 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide documentation pneumococcal vaccines were offered and/or administered for two (#37 and #216) of five sampled residents reviewed for immunizations. The administrator identified 64 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An Infection Control Immunizations policy, dated 3/20/24, read in part, all residents will be offered pneumococcal vaccines. Assessments of pneumococcal vaccination status will be conducted within five working days of the resident's admission. A review of Resident #37's immunization record did not document the resident had received or been offered a pneumococcal vaccination. A review of Resident #216's immunization record did not document the resident had received or been offered a pneumococcal vaccination. On 12/12/24 at 10:57 a.m., LPN #1 stated they did not know how the vaccines got ordered, but if an order pops up we did it. They stated they did not skip the vaccinations if they were ordered to be done on their shift. On 12/12/24 at 11:01 a.m., the DON stated on admission, they were to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-13 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain effective pest control. The administrator identified 64 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Pest Control Program policy, dated 11/17/24, read in part, Facility will maintain an effective pest control program that eradicates and contains common household pests. On 12/09/24 at 8:44 a.m., upon initial tour of the kitchen multiple mouse droppings were observed across the tops of four boxes of baking soda in the dry storage area. On 12/09/24 at 8:49 a.m., the dietary manager denied knowing what the mouse droppings were, but stated it was not something that needed to be there. They then threw four boxes of baking soda away. On 12/09/24 at 11:04 a.m., a cockroach was observed crawling on Resident #216's hand and prosthetic leg while sitting in the dining room. On 12/10/24 at 2:01 p.m., housekeeper/CNA #1 stated every once in a while, you see a roach. I know they have someone out for that pretty frequently. On 12/10/24 at 2:03 p.m., CNA #1 stated they had seen roaches and bedbugs. They spray and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for one (#2) of two sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The DON identified 58 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation policy, dated 11/17, read in part, Each resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation. The policy also read, .Physical Abuse includes, but not limited to hitting, slapping, pinching and kicking. Resident #2 had diagnoses which included other specified depressive episodes. An Initial State Reportable Incident form, dated 07/10/24, documented an allegation of abuse/mistreatment. It was documented Resident #2 was noted standing outside of the BOM doorway yelling [gender withheld] slapped me. It was documented Resident #2 was escorted out of the hallway. It was documented the BOM suspended was immediately pending investigation. A Final State Reportable Incident form, dated 07/29/24, documented an allegation of abuse/mistreatment. It was documented Resident #2 stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered for one (#10) of three sampled residents reviewed for misappropriation of property. The DON identified 58 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The Medication Administration and General Guidelines policy, dated 2021, read in part, Medications are administered in accordance with written orders of the attending physician. Resident #10 had diagnoses which included pain. A physician's order, dated 08/07/24, documented oxycodone HCL (narcotic medication) oral tablet 15 mg give 0.5 tablet via peg tube every four hours for pain. The September 2024 TAR documented a nine on the following days and times; a. 09/03/24 at 8:00 p.m., b. 09/06/24 at 12:00 a.m., 4:00 a.m., 8:00 p.m., and c. 09/24/24 at 4:00 a.m., 8:00 a.m. The September 2024 TAR documented blanks on the following days and times; a. 09/10/24 at 8:00 p.m., and b. 09/24/24 at 4:00 p.m. The September 2024 TAR documented a six on 09/13/24 at 4:00 p.m. A progress note, dated 09/24/24 at 2:02 p.m., documented oxycodone HCL…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-17 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide ulcer care as ordered by the physician for two (#1 and #3) of three residents sampled for ulcer care. LPN #1 identified 61 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The Wound Care LPN identified 13 residents received wound care in the facility. 1. Resident #1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis which included non pressure chronic ulcer with unspecified severity (back and right thigh). A Physician's Order, dated 05/25/24, documented, Hibiclens External Solution (Chlorhexidine Gluconate) Apply to back and thighs topically every day shift for use with each dressing change. A May 2024 TAR, had no documentation on 05/26/24 and 05/30/24 for the above treatment. A June 2024 TAR, had no documentation on 06/09/24 for the above treatment. A Physician's Order, dated 05/25/24, read in part, Non-pressure wound of the right flan: cleanse with hibiclense, pat dry, apply calcium alginate sprinkled with collagen powder, cover with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure ADL assistance was provided in a timely manner for one (#7) of four resident call lights observed for staff assistance in a timely manner. The administrator identified 51 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The Call Lights: Accessibility and Timely Response-Physical Environment policy, dated 01/24, read in part, .All staff members who see or hear an activated call light are responsible for responding. If the staff member cannot provide what the resident desires, the appropriate personnel should be notified . A Nursing admission Data Collection dated 05/16/24, documented Resident #7 had functional limitation on both lower extremities and they required one person substantial max assist for bed mobility. On 05/17/24 at 5:23 a.m., two call lights were observed on hall 200. On 05/17/24 at 5:41 a.m., LPN #2 and RN #1 were observed at the nurse's station while the call lights were on. Both call lights on hall 200 were not answered at this time. On 05/17/24 at 5:46 a.m., LPN #2 answered one of the call lights on hall…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to administer pain and nausea medication as ordered in a timely manner for one (#6) of three sampled residents reviewed for medication administration. The Administrator identified 65 residents resided in the facility. A Medication Administration and General Guidelines policy, read in part, Medications are administered in accordance with written orders of the attending physician. A physician's order dated 05/13/24, documented Norco 10-325 mg every 6 hours as needed for pain. A physician's order dated 05/13/24, documented Ondansetron 4 mg every 6 hours as needed for n/v. Review of Resident #6 MAR did not document the administration of prn pain nor nausea medications. Resident #5 had diagnosis which included senile degeneration of the brain and dysphagia. On 05/17/24 at 5:46 a.m., Resident #6 was observed during incontinent care to slightly moan when moved and to vomit at the end of care. On 05/17/24 at 5:49 a.m., the residents roommate, Resident #5, whom was also the residents family representative, requested CNA…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide pressure ulcer treatment as ordered for three (#3, 5, and #8) of three sampled residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The Resident Matrix, dated 02/01/24, documented two residents had pressure ulcers in the facility. Findings: 1. Resident #3 had diagnoses which included stage four sacrum wound and intestinal obstruction. A physician's order, dated 11/08/23, documented cleanse sacrum with normal saline, pat dry, apply santyl and calcium alginate, cover with boarded foam dressing every shift. The November 2023 TAR documented blanks for Resident #3's wound care for the day shift treatment on the 21st, 22nd, and 23rd. The November 2023 TAR documented blanks for Resident #3's wound care for the night shift treatment on the 10th. The December 2023 TAR documented blanks for Resident #3's wound care for the day shift treatment on the 17th and 19th. The December 2023 TAR documented blanks for Resident #3's wound care for the night shift treatment on the 13th, 14th, 18th, and 20th. On 02/05/23 at 12:09 p.m., the Wound Care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered for two (#5 and #8) of three sampled residents reviewed for medication administration. The Resident Matrix, dated 02/01/24, documented 73 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Medication Administration and General Guidelines policy, dated 2021, read in part, .Medications are administered as prescribed .Medications are prepared, administered, and recorded only by licensed nursing, medical, pharmacy, or other personnel authorized by state laws and regulations to administer medications .The resident's MAR is initialed by the person administering a medication, in the space provided .Or if using Electronic Medical Record, the initials of the nurse are electronically stamped into the record . 1. Resident #5 had diagnoses which included a stage four pressure wound of the sacrum and GERD. A Physician Order, dated 08/18/23, documented hydrocodone-acetaminophen oral tablet 5-325 mg give 5mg via PEG-Tube every eight hours for pain. A Physician Order, dated 10/23/23, documented…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were not stored at a resident's bedside for one (#8) of three sampled residents reviewed for medication administration. The Resident Matrix, dated 02/01/24, documented 73 residents resided in the facility. The Administrator identified no residents in the facility with orders for bedside medications. Findings: A Self- Administration of Medications by Residents policy, dated 2021, read in part, .If the resident demonstrates the ability to safely self-administer medications, a further assessment of the safety for bedside medication storage is conducted .The following conditions are met for bedside storage to occur .The manner of storage prevents access by other residents .The medications provided to the resident for bedside storage are kept in the containers dispensed by [Pharmacy name deleted] . Resident #8 had diagnoses which included constipation. On 02/02/24 at 10:05 a.m., Resident #8 stated they had their family member bring them in Ex-Lax and a stool softener. The resident was observed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-05 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to obtain a physician ordered urinalysis for one (#3) of three sampled residents reviewed for a change in condition. The Resident Matrix, dated 02/01/24, documented 73 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The Laboratory Services and Reporting policy, dated 11/17, read in part, .The facility must provide or obtain laboratory services when ordered by a physician .nurse practitioner . Resident #3 had diagnoses which included stage four sacrum wound and intestinal obstruction. A physician's order, dated 12/20/23, documented urinalysis. There was no documentation a urinalysis was obtained. On 02/05/23 at 11:13 a.m., the ADON stated if the urinalysis order was on the order form from the physician's liaison during rounds, they would not know if a urinalysis was ordered or to obtain. The ADON stated they put in the orders prescribed on the order form in the Resident's medical records. On 02/05/23 at 11:37 a.m., the DON provided the physician's order form dated 12/20/23 for Resident #3. The order documented to obtain a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-05 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure adequate portion sizes were offered to residents for one of one meal service observed. The DON identified 69 residents received services from the kitchen in the facility. Findings: The Menus and Adequate Nutrition policy, dated 11/17, read in part, .The facility will ensure that menus .be followed . A Diet Spreadsheet, dated 2019, for lunch documented, a. beef stroganoff over egg noodles 6 oz spoodle / 4 oz spoodle noodles, b. baby carrots 4 oz spoodle, c. broccoli 4 oz spoodle, and d. one slice garlic toast. The CDM identified the above menu as scheduled to be served for lunch on 02/02/24. On 02/02/24 at 11:45 a.m., the CDM plated six plates with one grey scoop of beef stroganoff, one spoodle of baby carrots, one spoodle of broccoli, and one slice of bread. On 02/02/24 at 11:49 a.m., the CDM stated the grey scoop was a number eight. The CDM stated the residents were getting more serving size with the number eight. On 02/02/24 at 11:52 a.m., the CDM reviewed the extended menu and scoop sizes. They…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure wound care treatment was accurately documented for one (#8) of three sampled residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The Resident Matrix, dated 02/01/24, documented two residents with pressure ulcers resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #8 had diagnoses which included pressure ulcer of sacral region stage four. A Physician Order, dated 10/28/23, documented cleanse sacral wound with normal saline, pat dry, apply Dakin's soaked gauze, cover with a silicone border dressing daily every day shift. The December 2023 MAR was blank for the sacral wound care on 12/21/23 and 12/25/23. The January 2024 MAR was blank for the sacral wound care on 01/22/24. On 02/05/24 at 1:50 p.m., the Wound Care Nurse stated they had worked at the facility on 12/21/23, 12/25/23, and 01/22/24. They stated every day they worked at the facility, they completed wound care. They stated they got pulled to do other things in the facility. They stated they completed the wound care but failed to document it.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-18 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — pattern
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the physician when: a. a resident's FSBS was out of range and when they administered glucagon for one (#44); b. a resident refused insulin administration for one (#44); c. a resident's routine insulin was held for one (#44); and d. a resident experienced a fall for one (#29) of 16 sampled residents reviewed for physician notification. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 08/14/23, documented 62 residents resided in the facility. The facility Resident Matrix, dated 08/14/23, documented 23 residents who received insulin resided in the facility. Findings: A Medications Administration and General Guidelines policy, undated, read in parts, .If a dose of regularly scheduled medication is withheld, refused .The physician must be notified when a dose of medication has not been given . 1. Resident #44 had diagnoses which included type one diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease, type one diabetes mellitus with ketoacidosis with coma, and hypertension. A Physician Order, dated 05/18/23,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to: a. intervene per physician's order when a resident's FSBS was out of range; and b. monitor blood pressure for a resident who received two medications to treat blood pressure and who received renal dialysis for one (#44) of eight sampled residents reviewed for medications administered as ordered. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 08/14/23, documented 62 residents resided in the facility. The facility Resident Matrix, dated 08/14/23, documented 23 residents who received insulin resided in the facility. Findings: A Medications Administration and General Guidelines policy, undated, read in parts, .Medications are administered as prescribed .Or if utilizing an Electronic Medical Record, the initials of the nurse are electronically stamped onto the record . Resident #44 had diagnoses which included type one diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease, type one diabetes mellitus with ketoacidosis with coma, and hypertension. A discontinued Physician Order, dated 01/14/23, documented the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide pressure ulcer treatment as ordered for one (#7) of three sampled residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The Resident Census and Conditions of Resident report, dated 08/14/23, documented three residents with pressure ulcers, excluding stage one, resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #7 had diagnoses which included a stage four pressure wound of the sacrum. A Physician Order, dated 06/27/23, documented sacrum: cleanse with Dakins 0.125 percent, pat dry, lightly pack with Dakins soaked gauze, cover with four by four/ABD pad, then secure with medical tape two times a day for wound care. The July 2023 TAR documented blanks for Resident #7's wound care for the 7:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. treatment on the 6th, 7th, 8th, 13th, 15th, 27th, 28th, 29th, and 30th. Wound Physician Notes, dated 07/14/23 and 07/27/23, documented Resident #7 had a stage four pressure wound of the sacrum. It documented the dressing treatment plan primary dressing Dakins 0.025 percent solution apply twice daily. It documented…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-18 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — pattern
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure: a. a tube feeding bag administering nutrition and hydration contained the date, time, and name of the staff who hung the feeding for administration for one (#29); b. a resident was provided tube feedings as ordered by the physician for one (#44); c. staff documented by mouth intake for a resident who had tube feeding orders for by mouth intake of less than 50 percent for one (#44); and d. tube feeding water flush order was implemented for one (#53) of four sampled residents reviewed for nutrition. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 08/14/23, documented five residents who received tube feedings resided in the facility. Findings: The facility's Feeding Tubes policy, dated 01/02/19, read in part, Residents that have been identified as requiring nutritional support will receive enteral (tube) feeding per professional standards related to ordering, administering, documenting and assessing nutritional support via tube feeding. Based on the resident's comprehensive assessment, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered for two (#29 and #44) of eight sampled residents reviewed for medication administration. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 08/14/23, documented 62 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Medications Administration and General Guidelines policy, undated, read in parts, .Medications are administered as prescribed .Or if utilizing an Electronic Medical Record, the initials of the nurse are electronically stamped onto the record .' 1. Resident #29 had diagnoses which included spastic hemiplegia affecting the right nondominant side, unspecified pain, and cerebral infarction. A Physician Order, dated 06/17/23, documented oxycodone 15 mg give one tablet via PEG-tube every eight hours for pain. The July 2023 MAR documented blanks for the 2:00 p.m. oxycodone administration on the 6th, 7th, and 13th. On 08/14/23 at 2:31 p.m., Resident #29 was asked if they received their medications as ordered. They stated, No pain pills. They were asked how often…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-18 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to follow the menu for two of two meals observed. The DON identified 56 residents who received their meals from the kitchen. Findings: An undated facility menu, titled Week at a Glance .[facility name]2019 .week 4, documented residents would be served three cheese penne bake, meadow blend vegetables, sweet pineapple tidbits, breadstick, and beverage for Tuesday's lunch menu on 08/15/23. On 08/16/23 Wednesday's lunch menu, the residents would be served cornflake chicken, garlic mashed potatoes, buttered peas, blueberry crumble bar, dinner roll/margarine, and a beverage. The CDM provided the menu upon request. On 08/15/23 at 11:51 a.m., an observation was made during lunch. The residents were served three cheese penne bake, green beans, a slice of sandwich bread, and a cup of flavored drink. There was no dessert observed on the resident meals trays. On 08/15/23 at 11:54 a.m., the CDM stated the slice of bread was a substitute for the breadstick, and the vanilla cake was a substitute for the sweet pineapple…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to: a. record food temperatures; b. ensure staff wore beard restraint during meal preparation; and c. ensure ice was stored in a manner to prevent cross contamination. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 08/14/23, documented 62 residents resided in the facility. The DON reported six residents were NPO. Findings: An Ice Chest and Ice Machine policy, reviewed 01/02/19, read in parts, .To reduce transmission of infection via ice machines within the facility and to ensure that the ice machines and equipment are properly handled and cleaned .All persons handling ice must .Wash hands thoroughly . The facility's Process of Following Menu and Monitoring Food Temperature policy, dated 08/17/23, read in part, .Food temperatures shall be recorded by the cook preparing each meal .The dietary manager is responsible for assuring that the temperature record is utilized at each meal . An undated facility policy, read in part, .Effective hair restraints must be worn when working with or around food…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure: a. the cap to prevent cross contamination was present on a tube feeding port for one (#29) of four sampled resident's reviewed for nutrition; b. linens contaminated with bodily fluids were removed from a resident's bed for one (#41) of 28 sampled residents observed for clean environment; and c. incontinent care was provided in a manner to prevent cross contamination for one (#1) of three sampled residents observed for incontinent care. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 08/14/23, documented 62 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Linen Handling policy, dated 01/02/19, read in part, .All linen is handled, stored, transported, and processed to contain and minimize exposure to waste products . A Hand Hygiene policy, undated, read in parts, .Purpose: To decrease spread of infection .When to wash hands .When hands are visibly dirty or contaminated or are visibly soiled with blood or other body…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-18 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a call light was in reach for one (#29) of 28 sampled residents reviewed for call lights. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 08/14/23, documented 62 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #29 had diagnoses which included spastic hemiplegia affecting the right nondominant side and cerebral infarction. Resident #29's Fall Care Plan, updated 06/27/23, documented the resident was at risk for falls related to weakness and stroke with interventions that included be sure the resident's call light was within reach and encourage them to use it. A Medicare 5-day assessment, dated 08/03/23, documented the resident had moderately impaired cognition and required extensive two person physical assistance for bed mobility. It documented the resident had a functional limitation in range of motion impairment on one side for the upper and lower extremity. On 08/14/23 at 2:39 p.m., Resident #29 was asked about their call light. The resident wrote on a communication board I lost…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide a clean, sanitary, homelike environment for one (#29) of 28 sampled residents reviewed for homelike environment. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 08/14/23, documented 62 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Linen Handling policy, dated 01/02/19, read in parts, .All linen is handled, stored, transported, and processed to contain and minimize exposure to waste products .Do not place soiled linen on floor or furniture . A Facility Cleaning Schedule, undated, documented daily Monday through Friday resident rooms: night stands, over bed tables, lights, window blinds, windows, and mop floors. Resident #29 had diagnoses which included spastic hemiplegia affecting the right nondominant side and cerebral infarction. A Medicare 5-day assessment, dated 08/03/23, documented the resident had moderately impaired cognition and required extensive two person physical assistance for bed mobility. It documented the resident had a functional limitation in range of motion impairment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-18 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure MDS Resident Assessments were accurate for one (#48) of 21 sampled residents reviewed for MDS resident assessments. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 08/14/23, documented 62 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #48 had diagnoses which included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, aphasia, encephalopathy, flaccid hemiplegia affecting left side. An Annual Resident Assessment, dated 06/26/23, documented Resident #48 had no impairment to upper or lower extremities. On 08/18/23 at 9:15 a.m., MDS Coordinator #1 was asked to review Resident #48's annual resident assessment dated [DATE] and then asked if it documented the resident had impairment to upper and lower extremities. They stated, No. They were asked to review the resident's impairment to upper and lower extremities and determine if the assessment was accurate. MDS Coordinator #1 reviewed the impairment to extremities and stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-18 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure: a. physician ordered weekly weights were obtained for one (#170) of three sampled residents reviewed for weight loss, and b. physician ordered supplement of high protein high calorie was provided for one (#170) of four sampled residents reviewed for nutrition. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 08/14/23, documented 62 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #170 had diagnoses which included pressure ulcer stage 4, diabetes mellitus, surgical aftercare digestive system, gastrostomy status, and artrial fibrillation. An admission Summary progress note, dated 08/04/23, read in part, .to have a high calorie high protein 530 kcal boost shake four times a day and weight of 119.0 pounds . A Nutrition/Weight progress note, dated 08/09/23, read in part, .diet regular, regular texture. Resident is to have high protein, high calorie boost with each meal. 530 kcal boost shake with every meal . An Order Summary report, dated 08/15/23, read in part, .Regular diet, Regular…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-18 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — isolated
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to offer bedtime snacks for one snack service observed. The DON identified 56 residents who received their meals from the kitchen. Findings: The facility's Snacks (Between Meal and Bedtime), Serving policy, dated 12/15/18, read in part, Snacks will be provided to residents for supplemental or between meal nourishment . On 08/14/23 at 1:08 p.m., Resident #42 stated they did not receive snacks. On 08/14/23 at 1:28 p.m., Resident #115 was asked if they received snacks. They stated, No. On 08/14/23 at 1:46 p.m., Resident #7 was asked if they received snacks. Resident #7 stated they had to call for snacks. They stated no one brought snacks. On 08/14/23 at 4:38 p.m., Resident #50 stated they did not receive snacks from the facility. On 08/15/23 at 10:17 a.m., the Resident Council Representative was asked if they received snacks at bedtime or when snacks were requested. They stated snacks were put at the front desk and they had to ask staff to get them. On 08/15/23 10:29 a.m., the Resident Council Representative stated snacks were at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow physician's orders for four (#26, 46, 47, and #51) of four sampled residents reviewed for following physician's orders. The Census and Conditions of Residents Report documented 65 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Resident #26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included pulmonary embolism, end stage renal disease, congestive heart failure, and diabetes mellitus, insomnia, and atrial fibrillation. The resident's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) (a resident assessment tool used to identify resident care needs), dated 10/26/21, documented the resident's cognition was intact, and required limited to extensive assistance with ADL's. On 12/16/21 at 10:02 a.m., the resident stated that he goes to Dialysis on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday, he leaves the facility at 1:00 p.m. and returns to the facility at 7:15 p.m. The resident's Medication Review Report, dated 12/20/21, documented current physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-21 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to a. identify significant weight loss and intervene for one (#47), and b. identify a therapeutic diet preference and intervene for one (#51) of four residents reviewed for nutrition. The Census and Conditions of Residents Report documented 65 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Resident # 47 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included urinary tract infection, dehydration, and disorientation. The resident's Hospital Discharge Summary, dated 11/20/21, documented the resident weighed 127 lbs on 11/15/21. The resident's Physician's Orders, dated 11/20/21, read in parts, .Obtain and record weekly weight .Regular diet, regular texture, thin consistency. The resident's Care Plan, dated 11/23/21, read in parts, .I am at risk for alteration in nutritional status My goal is to attain and maintain adequate nutritional status and no significant weight changes through next review date .Diet: Regular with no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to a. provide a separately locked, permanently affixed compartment for storage of controlled drugs; b. monitor the medication room temperature daily in one of one medication storage room observed for medication storage; c. store drugs in a containers labeled with a resident's name and identification of the drug; and d. discard medications from the medication cart for destruction after a resident was discharged from the facility and discard expired medications for three of four medication carts observed for medication storage. The Census and Conditions of Residents Report identified 65 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: A Storage of Medications policy, read in part, .Medications are stored in a safe, secure, and orderly manner in accordance with federal and state regulations and facility policies .Medications are stored in the containers in which they are received .No discontinued, outdated or deteriorated medications are available for use in the facility. All such medications are destroyed .All…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to a. remove expired food from the refrigerator, and b. store and label food in a safe manner for two of two refrigerators observed for food storage and labeling. The Director of Nursing reported 65 residents received meals from the kitchen. Findings: On 12/15/21 at 9:15 a.m., the kitchen was observed during the initial tour. Seven, one-gallon containers of milk were in the refrigerator with a 12/12/21 expiration date. A second refrigerator was observed to have a stainless-steel container with bacon covered with plastic wrap that was not labeled and dated. The Dietary Manager (DM) stated the milk should have been discarded. The DM stated the container of bacon should have been labeled to ensure proper storage and use-by dates.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$8,278 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $8,278 — penalty dated 2025-04-09
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-05-02 for 3 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to EMERALD HEALTHCARE — 14 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.3-0.3 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 51.5-0.5 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 51.8+0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 52.0≈ chain avg
The other 13 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.3★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
ADMN GROUPOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/17/2017
DAVID M FISTEL OK LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/17/2017
JW OKLAHOMA HOLDINGS, LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/17/2017
LME FAMILY HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/17/2017
MOUSSAIEFF FAMILY HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/17/2017
MRW PARTNERS LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/17/2017
NJNY17 LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/17/2017
OKL HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/17/2017
SANDROrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/17/2017
YCOK HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/17/2017
BANKERS TRUST COMPANYOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTERESTsince 03/17/2017
AWOPEJU, OLUKAYODEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/15/2020
FLEISCHMANN, DAVIDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/17/2022
GOPIN, BRIANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/15/2019
LEE, REBEKAHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/28/2021
EMERALD HEALTHCARE LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/17/2017
EVOLVE THERAPY SERVICES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/21/2021
FORVIS MAZARS LLPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/17/2017
LIMESTONE FISCAL SERVICES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/27/2024
MERCH PAY INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/17/2017
SAUL N FRIEDMAN & COMPANYOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/17/2017
WELLSKY CORPORATIONOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2024
JOHN, TENEYIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 06/30/2025
MINER, LAQUETAIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 09/19/2022
SMITH, MELISSAIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 03/17/2017
VANBRUNT, AMYIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 03/17/2017

CMS files one row per role, so the 40 rows in the source record cover these 26 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

18 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-4.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.2M
Related-party expense16% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 78%Medicare 17%Other / private 5%

About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$332per resident / day
operating cost
$10,103per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$319per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Oklahoma Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Oklahoma
$7,026/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,756/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,150/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 375135. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-12-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next