No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Memory Care Center At Emerald

2700 North Hickory Street, Claremore, OK 74017 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 60 certified beds · (918) 283-4949 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseResident-funds citation (F0569)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation$15,239 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0569)
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (50) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $15,239 in federal fines (most recent 2024-05-14)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (69%) runs well above the national median (45%)
  • about 17% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
  • its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1501 N. Florence · (918) 342-3633 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1151 N Lynn Riggs Blvd · (918) 283-3784 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Reasor's1.4 mi
1000 W. Rogers Blvd · (918) 341-4036 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Rogers County Conservation, 1900 W Will Rogers Cir · (918) 341-4147 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased23.7%13.6%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight0.0%3.3%5.4%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%1.9%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%2.8%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%3.4%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.7%4.7%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened19.0%13.7%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication37.3%25.7%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.3%94.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.3%4.7%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control11.9%17.1%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table45.9%17.5%17.1%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.572.311.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days4.152.961.80worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

10.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.25U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.16hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 35% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.4%CMS range 5.9–14.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.921.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.16
RN hours/ resident / day
0.77
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.47
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.39
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.16
RN hoursweekends
68.9%
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 57.1 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.39 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.16 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.47 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.20 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.47 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.15 to 0.16 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 69% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

19
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-05-14)
22
at the previous standard inspection (2023-04-03)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

50 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 37 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2023-04-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. Res #57 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses which included right femur fracture, Parkinson's disease, dementia with mild agitation, and neuropathy. A fall scene investigation report, dated 02/28/23, documented Res #57 was found on the floor by his chair, with no injuries. Interventions documented would be to monitor resident, re-orient, and continue with therapy. A care plan, initiated on 03/01/23, documented the resident was at risk for falls. The care plan documented the following interventions. a. Anticipate and meet the resident's needs. b. Be sure the resident's call light is within reach and encourage the resident to use it for assistance as needed. c. Educate the resident/family/caregivers about safety reminders and what to do if a fall occurs. d. Encourage the resident to participate in activities that promote exercise, physical activity for strengthening and improved mobility. e. Ensure that the resident is wearing appropriate footwear when ambulating or mobilizing in w/c. f.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2026-06-02 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse by a resident for 1 (#64) for 3 sampled residents reviewed for abuse.The administrator identified 58 residents resided in the facility.Findings:A facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, dated 01/2024, read in part, Resident must not be subject to abuse by anyone, including, but no limited to; facility staff, other residents, consultants, contractors, volunteers, or staff of other agencies serving the resident, family members, legal guardian, friends, or other individuals. Prevention of abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation - The facility will consider utilization of the following tips for prevention of abuse, neglect, and exploitation. Observe resident behavior and their reactions to other residents, roommates, tablemates.An admission assessment, dated 04/02/26, showed Res #24 had a BIMS score of 6 (a BIMS score of 6 indicated the resident's cognition was severely impaired) and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-05-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from neglect for one (# 1) of four residents reviewed for neglect. The Administrator reported the facility census was 53. Findings: A facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, revised 01/24, read in part, .Each resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation .Neglect, as defined at 483.5, means the failure of the facility, its employees or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish or emotional distress . Resident #1 had diagnoses which included severe unspecified dementia with anxiety and senile degeneration of the brain. An admission assessment, dated 03/15/24, documented Resident #1 was severely impaired for daily decision making and was able to walk without assistance. A nurse note, dated 05/18/24 at 7:44 pm, documented the CMA on duty notified the nurse that Resident #1 was found laying on the concrete patio in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-02 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the OSDH and a local law enforcement agency were notified of allegations of abuse within two hours of the allegations becoming known to the facility for 2 (#3 and #64) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for abuse.The administrator identified 58 residents resided in the facility.Findings:A facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, dated 01/2024, read in part, In response to allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, the facility must: Ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation or (sic) resident property, are reported immediately, but now later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that caused the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other official (including the State Survey Agency and adult protected service where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities) in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to report allegations of abuse to the Oklahoma State Department of Health for 1 (#1) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The administrator reported 56 residents resided at the facility. Findings: A facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, dated 11/17, read in part, In response to allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, the facility must: (1) Ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property are reported immediately, but not later that 2 hours after the allegation is made .to the administrator of the facility and other officials .in accordance with State law through established procedures. A progress note titled Mood/Behavior, dated 04/28/25 at 8:51 p.m., showed Res #1 had reported to LPN #2 that Res #1 was having a romantic relationship with CNA #1, an unidentified LPN had twice sexually assaulted a resident, and an unidentified CNA was living at Res #1's home…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-12 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to: a. thoroughly investigate allegations of sexual abuse; b. investigate an allegation of misappropriation; and c. initiate precautions to protect residents from the alleged perpetrators for 1 (#1) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for abuse The administrator stated the facility had 56 residents resided at the facility. Findings: A facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, dated 11/17, read in part, When suspicion of abuse, neglect or exploitation, or reports of abuse, neglect or exploitation occur, an investigation is immediately warranted. An MDS admission assessment, dated 03/16/25, showed in Section C that Res. #1 had been assessed and found to have a BIMS score of 03 which indicated their cognition was severely impaired. A progress note titled Mood/Behavior, dated 04/28/25 at 8:51 p.m., showed Res #1 had reported to LPN #2 that Res #1 was having a romantic relationship with CNA #1, an unidentified LPN had twice sexually assaulted a resident, and an unidentified CNA was living at Res #1's home and receiving…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure proper food service sanitation, cleaning and storage requirements were followed. The ADON identified all 56 residents who resided at the facility received food from the kitchen. Findings: An undated, Sanitation of Dining and Food Service Areas policy, read in part, The Dining Service staff will uphold sanitation of the dining areas. The policy also read, All staff will be trained on the frequency of cleaning. The policy also read, Staff will be held responsible for all cleaning tasks. An undated Sanitizing and Disinfectant Solutions policy, read in part, Bleach solution should be at a concentration of greater than or equal to 50 to 100 ppm. An undated Food Storage(Dry, Refrigerated, and Frozen) policy, read in part, All food items will be labeled. The label must include the name of the food and the date by which it should be sold, consumed, or discarded. On 05/06/24 at 9:50 a.m., a tour of the kitchen was conducted. The following observations were made. a. [NAME] #1 did not have on a beard guard and had a full beard,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-14 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident's representative completed the resident's code status correctly and were offered the choice to formulate an advanced directive for two (#6 and #48) of three sampled residents reviewed for advanced directives. The administrator identified 56 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: The facility's Admission policy, revised 01/2024, read in part, The facility will review all advance directive information during the admission process to assure that the resident's wishes will be incorporated in the plan of care. The policy also read, The facility allows advance directive information to be given to the resident's representative at the time of admission if the resident is incapacitated, whether or not the resident has executed an advanced directive 1. Resident #6 A document titled, Advance Directive Code (Resuscitate) Status, dated 02/26/24, documented Resident #6's POA had initialed the resident was a full code and a DNR. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure wheelchairs were clean and maintained in good repair for two ( #1 and #25) of three sampled residents who were reviewed for wheelchair maintenance. The Administrator identified 56 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: The facility's Physical Environment: Space and Equipment policy, revised 01/2024, read in part, Inspection of resident care equipment will be completed routinely and as needed to maintain and ensure safe operating conditions. 1. Resident #1's quarterly assessment, dated 04/10/24, documented they ambulated with a manual wheelchair and walker. On 05/06/24 at 11:24 a.m., Resident #1's wheelchair armrests were observed to be torn and had the yellow padding showing. The wheelchair was observed to be dirty. 2. Resident #25's significant change assessment, dated 08/14/23, documented they ambulated with a manual wheelchair. On 05/06/24 at 12:17 p.m., Resident #25's wheelchair armrests were observed to be torn with the yellow padding showing. The wheelchair was observed to be dirty. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-14 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy related to: a. reporting allegations of abuse and/or neglect to the OSDH and investigating allegations of abuse and/or neglect for three (#6, #9, and #41) of five sampled residents who were reviewed for abuse allegations; and b. abuse training upon hire for seven (#1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and #7) of 25 sampled employee files reviewed for abuse training. The administrator identified 56 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: The facility's Abuse Neglect and Exploitation policy, revised 01/2024, read in part, Ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse .are reported immediately, but not later than two hours after the allegation is made. The policy also read, Alleged Violation is a situation or occurrence that is observed or reported by staff, resident, relative, visitor or others but has not yet been investigated The policy also read, Neglect means the failure of the facility, its employees or service providers to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to develop a care plan for oxygen therapy for one (#6) of one sampled resident who received oxygen therapy and limited range of motion with contracture for one (#20) of two sampled residents who had limited range of motion. The ADON identified six residents who utilized oxygen, ten residents who had limited range of motion, and three residents who had contractures. Findings. The facility's Special Needs policy, revised 01/2024, read in part, Comprehensive care plans will be developed based on resident assessments, goals and preferences. 1. Resident #6 had diagnoses which included acute respiratory failure with hypoxia. Resident #6's Monthly Physician's Orders, included oxygen 2 liters via nasal cannula continuously. Resident #6's care plan did not document they utilized oxygen therapy, how often to change the nasal cannula, oxygen safety, or interventions. On 05/06/24 at 12:26 p.m., Resident #6 was observed in their room with oxygen at two liters via nasal cannula. An oxygen concentrator machine with a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-14 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staff a. was available to provide incontinent care for one (#9) of one sampled resident who required incontinent care; b. was available to provide supervision during meals for one (#46) of two sampled residents who required supervision with meals; and c. was available to provide a licensed staff member on a 24 hour basis. The ADON identified 40 residents who required assistance with incontinent care, 10 residents who required assistance with meals, and 56 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Resident #9 had diagnoses which included frontotemporal neurocognitive disorder. Resident #9's care plan for ADLs, dated 09/12/23, documented the resident required one person assist for toileting, transferring, and personal hygiene. Resident #9's quarterly assessment, dated 11/28/23, documented the resident required substantial maximal assist with toileting, dressing, transferring, and was frequently incontinent of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-14 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure licensed nurse, and certified nurse aides received competency/skills checks for four (LPN #1, CNA # 2, CNA #3, and CNA #4) of five employee files reviewed for competency/skills checks. The administrator identified 56 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Nursing Services and Sufficient Staff policy, dated 02/23, read in part, It is the policy of this facility to provide sufficient staff with appropriate competencies and skill sets to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being of each resident. The policy also read, The facility must ensure that licensed nurses have the specific competencies and skill sets necessary to care for resident's needs as identified through resident assessments and described in the plan of care. The policy also read, The facility must ensure that nurse aides are able to demonstrate competency in skills and techniques necessary to care for resident's needs, as identified through resident assessments, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 37 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-14 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — pattern
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure: a. the services of an RN was available in the facility eight hours daily seven days a week, and b. there was a RN designated as full time DON. The administrator identified 56 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Nursing Services and Sufficient Staff policy, read in part, .Except when waived, the facility must use the services of a registered nurse for at least 8 consecutive hours, 7 days a week. A document of in and out time punches for April 1st, 2024 through May 5th, 2024 documented RN #1's shifts worked as follows: 1. 04/05/24 12.37 hours worked. 2. 04/06/24 12.17 hours worked. 3. 04/18/24 17.70 hours worked. 4. 04/19/24 12.65 hours worked. 5. 04/25/24 12.48 hours worked. 6. 04/29/24 12.23 hours worked. 7. 05/03/24 12.42 hours worked. A document of in and out time punches for April 1st, 2024 through May 5th, 2024 documented RN #2's shifts worked as follows: 1. 04/12/24 8.77 hours worked. 2. 04/13/24 8.97 hours worked. 3. 04/14/24…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-14 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure menus were followed for one of one meal preparation and service observed. The ADON identified all 56 residents received their meals from the kitchen. Findings: A Menus and Adequate nutrition policy, dated 01/2024, read in part, The purpose of this policy is to assure menus are developed and prepared, based on reasonable efforts, to meet resident choices and reflect the resident's nutritional, religious, cultural, and ethnic needs, while using established guidelines and considering resident preferences. The policy also read, The facility will ensure that menus, The policy also read, Be followed; The policy also read, All residents have the right to make their own personal dietary choices. On 05/06/24 at 9:59 a.m., [NAME] #1 stated the lunch menu was chicken paprikash, egg noodles, squash, and mixed fruit. The menu was observed and it documented the noon meal was to have been chicken paprikash, buttered egg noodles, squash medley, melon cubes, and beverage. On 05/06/24 at 1:25 p.m., [NAME] #1 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure oxygen tubing was stored in a manner to prevent cross contamination for one (#6) of one sampled resident who was observed for oxygen therapy. The ADON identified six residents who received oxygen therapy. Findings: Resident #6 had diagnoses which included acute respiratory failure with hypoxia. Resident #6's Monthly Physician's Orders, included oxygen 2 liters via nasal cannula continuously. On 05/06/24 at 12:26 p.m., Resident #6 was observed in their room. The nasal cannula oxygen tubing hooked up to the portable oxygen tank was observed lying on the floor. On 05/09/24 at 9:15 a.m., Resident #6 was observed in the dining room wearing the oxygen nasal cannula that was hooked up to the portable oxygen tank. On 05/09/24 at 9:25 a.m., the nasal cannula hooked up the oxygen concentrator was observed hanging from the regulator and was discolored. The humidifier bottle was out of water and had water stains on the bottle. On 05/09/24 at 9:58 a.m., the ADON was shown pictures of the nasal cannula and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-14 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure emergency call cords were long enough to be reached by the residents if they were lying on the floor in the shower for two (#44 and #56) of two residents who were able to independently shower. The ADON identified 12 residents who would have the cognitive ability to utilize the call light. Findings: 1. Resident #44 On 05/06/24 at 10:30 a.m., CNA #8 stated Resident #44 was able to shower themselves independently. They stated they assisted them with gathering the shower supplies. On 05/06/24 at 12:36 p.m., Resident #44's bathroom was observed. The emergency call cord in the bathroom was next to the toilet and not within reach of the shower. On 05/08/24 at 2:39 p.m., the ADON stated Resident #44 should be provided stand by assistance in the shower to stay on task. The ADON stated Resident #44 would not be able to reach the call light if they fell in shower. On 05/09/24 at 11:10 a.m., Resident #44 was shown the call cord in their bathroom and was asked if they knew what the cord was for next to their toilet. Resident #44…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was treated with dignity during dining for one (#20) of four sampled residents observed during two meals. The ADON identified 10 residents who required assistance with meals. Findings: The facility's, Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) policy, revised 01/2024, read in part, A resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living will receive the necessary services to maintain good nutrition . Resident #20 had diagnoses which included dementia. Resident #20's annual assessment, dated 03/12/24, documented they were dependent on staff for eating. On 05/09/24 at 8:45 a.m., RN #1 was observed feeding Resident #20, they got up from the table, Resident #20 had food remaining on her plate and went across the room to encourage another resident to eat. RN #1 came back to the table and assisted another resident to eat while Resident #20 was sitting at the table with a plate of food in front of them. On 05/09/24 at 8:49 a.m., Resident #6 was heard telling Resident #20 Take a bite, you can do it.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-14 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an investigation was initiated for one (#13) of six resident sampled for abuse. The Administrator identified 56 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation policy, revised 1-2024, read in part, a. Respond to the needs of the resident and protect them from further incident (document), b. Notify the Director of Nursing and Administrator (document), c. initiate an investigation immediately. The policy also read, f. Contact the State Agency and the local Ombudsman office to report the alleged abuse. The policy also read, h. Monitor and document the resident's condition, including the response to medical treatment or nursing interventions, i. Document actions taken in steps above in the medical record. Resident #13 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of unspecified dementia, senile degeneration of the brain, and anxiety disorder, unspecified. A quarterly assessment dated , 03/13/24, documented the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-14 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure MDS assessments were accurate for one (#20) of two sampled residents reviewed for accuracy of documentation for limited range of motion on the MDS assessment. The ADON identified 10 residents who had limited range of motion and three residents who had contractures. Findings: Resident #20's annual assessment, dated 03/12/24, documented they had no impairment for limited range of motion to the shoulder, elbow, wrist, or hand. On 05/07/24 at 11:58 a.m., Resident #20's family member stated the resident's hand was contracted. On 05/09/24 at 8:54 a.m., Resident # 20's left hand was observed to be closed. On 05/09/24 at 9:07 a.m., CNA #7 stated Resident #20's hand was contracted. On 05/14/24 at 10:03 a.m., the ADON stated Resident #20's hand was contracted. They reviewed the MDS assessment and stated the assessment was filled out incorrectly. They stated the assessment documented no impairment in range of motion to upper extremities.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-14 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to include a care plan regarding isolation for one (#13) of 19 sampled resident reviewed for care planning. The Administrator identified 56 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Care Plan Process policy, revised 09/2019, read in part, The plan of care must describe the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and social well-being. The policy also read, Maintains care plans on a current status. The policy also read, Aid in preventing or reducing declines in the residents's functional status and/or functional levels. Resident #13 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis which included unspecified dementia, senile degeneration of brain, anxiety disorder, unspecified. An Infection Note dated 04/08/24, documented, nurse practioner gave orders to begin isolation precautions until completion of antibiotic treatment. There was no documentation on the care plan of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure neurological checks were completed after a fall with head injury for one (#41) of four sampled residents reviewed for accident hazards. The Administrator identified 56 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An Accidents/Neuro Checks policy, revised 1-24, read in part, The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for a neurological assessment:. The policy also read, Neurological assessments are indicated:. The policy also read, Following an unwitnessed fall;. The policy also read, Following a fall or other accident/injury involving head trauma;. Resident #41 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Alzheimer's Disease, unspecified, dementia in other disease class, and bipolar disorder. Resident #41's significant change assessment documented the resident had severe cognitive impairment. An Incident Note, dated 12/24/23, documented, Resident standing at counter. Resident from [room number withheld] approached…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure oxygen tubing was labeled, dated, and changed per facility policy for one (#6) of one sampled resident who was observed for oxygen therapy. The ADON identified six residents who received oxygen therapy. Findings: The facility's, Special Needs policy, revised 01/2024, read in part, To address special needs, this facility will provide the necessary care and treatment .consistent with professional standards of practice. Resident #6 had diagnoses which included acute respiratory failure with hypoxia. Resident #6's Monthly Physician's Orders, included oxygen 2 liters via nasal cannula continuously. On 05/06/24 at 12:26 p.m., Resident #6 was observed in their room. The oxygen tubing hooked up to the oxygen concentrator was not dated. On 05/09/24 at 9:15 a.m., Resident #6 was observed in the dining room wearing the oxygen nasal cannula hooked up to the portable oxygen tank. The oxygen tubing was dated 03/29/24. CNA #7 observed the date on the tubing and verified the date. On 05/09/24 at 9:25 a.m., the nasal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-14 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure antipsychotic medications were ordered with an appropriate diagnoses for one (#5) of five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The ADON identified 23 residents were prescribed psychotropic medications. Findings: Resident #5 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included unspecified dementia and general anxiety disorder. A Physician's Order, dated 09/20/22, documented aripiprazole tablet 5 mg by mouth one time a day for unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbance. On 05/14/24 at 9:52 a.m., the ADON stated schizophrenia, bipolar, and depression where appropriate diagnoses for aripiprazole. On 05/14/24 at 9:53 a.m., the ADON stated that dementia to their knowledge was not an appropriate diagnosis for aripiprazole.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-14 · tag F0847 — isolated
    Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to explain the arbitration agreement in a manner the resident representative could understand for one (#21) of three sampled residents who entered into a binding arbitration agreement. The administrator identified 25 residents who had entered into a binding arbitration agreement. Findings: A document titled, Voluntary Arbitration Agreement, dated 04/08/24, documented Resident #21's family member signed the agreement. On 05/09/24 at 8:08 a.m., Resident #21's representative was asked if they understood the arbitration agreement they signed. The family member stated they did not realize what they were signing. They stated they did not realize they were giving up their right to have litigation in court. They stated they were stressed out and signing a lot of paperwork. The family member stated the facility went over the paper work so fast, they guessed they should have paid more attention. They stated they were not told they could withdraw from the agreement within 30 days of signing the agreement. On 05/10/24 at 9:31 a.m., the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-17 · tag F0569 — pattern
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to convey remaining funds to the legal representatives of deceased residents within 30 days for two (#1 and #3) of three sampled residents reviewed for finances. An Action Summary report, dated [DATE], documented 12 residents had died while residing at the facility in the five months prior to the survey. Findings: 1. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on [DATE]. A financial statement, dated [DATE], documented that on [DATE] Resident #1 had a credit owed in the amount of $2,688.00. A Refund Request Form dated [DATE], documented $2,688.00 was paid to the Resident #1's spouse. 2. Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on [DATE]. A financial statement, dated [DATE], documented Resident #3 had a credit of $8,550.00. On [DATE] at 1:15 p.m. the BOM reported they had been unaware of the credits owed to the estates of Residents #1 and #3. They stated the organization used a contracted agency for billing and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-17 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify a resident representative of a new skin issue after its discovery for one (#2) of three sampled residents reviewed for notification of change. A Detailed Census Report form, dated 10/16/23, documented 57 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #2 had diagnoses which included dementia and abnormalities of gait [inability to walk in a normal manner]. A Notification of Change policy, dated May 2017, read in part .It is the policy of this facility that changes in a resident's condition or treatment is are immediately shared with the resident and/or the resident representative, according to their authority . A Skin/Wound Weekly Observation form, dated 09/05/23, documented a discoloration of bruise that was shaped like the letter C and located on the left buttock. A progress note, dated 09/06/23 at 2:23 p.m., documented a hospice nurse had reported a bruise on the upper left buttock, left hip area that measured approximately two inches in length. The note further documented the primary care physician was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-03 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a code status was documented and the person with legal authority signed the DNR form for two (#2 and #26) of 24 residents reviewed for advance directives. The facility failed to ensure: a. a code status was documented for Res #26, and b. the person with legal authority signed the DNR form for Res #2. The facility census and condition report documented 56 residents lived in the facility. Findings: Resident #26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included heart failure, atherosclerotic heart disease, and other specified heart block. The annual assessment, dated [DATE], documented the resident was severely impaired for daily decision making. There was no documentation of code status or physician order for code status on the resident's EHR. The care plan, dated [DATE], documented the resident had a terminal prognosis and was on hospice. On [DATE] at 10:30 a.m., an interview was conducted with LPN #2, and she stated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure housekeeping and maintenance services were provided to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior for seven (#9, 15, 20, 34, 35, 39, and #51) of eight residents observed for a clean, comfortable, homelike environment. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 56 residents resided in the facility. Findings: On 03/27/23 at 2:37 p.m., Res #35's bathroom was observed with part of the vinyl trim missing and/or pulled away from the wall. Parts of the wall had cracks in the paint and plaster. During the observation the maintenance man came in the room. He was shown the area which needed repair. He stated he was not aware of the room needing repair. He stated he did monthly rounds in the facility to check if repairs were needed. He stated staff were to log maintenance issues on the maintenance log. On 03/27/23 at 3:00 p.m., Res #34 complained of a sticky area on her bathroom floor in front of her toilet. The area was observed to be approximately two feet in length and three to four inches…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-04-03 · tag F0626 — pattern
    Permit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were permitted to return to the facility after they were hospitalized for one (#111) of three residents reviewed for discharges. The MDS coordinator identified 21 residents who had been discharged from the facility in the last six months. Findings: Res #111 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses which included Alzheimer's disease, delusional disorders, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, chronic pain, migraines, and cerebrovascular disease. A quarterly MDS assessment, dated 07/01/22, documented the resident's cognition was severely impaired, required the extensive assistance of one person with bed mobility, transfers, dressing, and toileting. A nurse note, dated 09/23/22 at 5:17, documented a CNA came to that nurse and reported the resident had bit the aide on the arm. The nurse informed the ADON, administrator, and family member. A social services note, dated 09/23/22 at 5:30, documented SSD, ADON, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-04-03 · tag F0637 — pattern
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to conduct a significant change assessment within 14 days after a change in condition for two (#2 and #31) of 24 sampled residents whose assessments were reviewed. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 56 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Res #31's annual assessment, dated 09/12/22, documented the resident was cognitively intact and needed limited assistance with most ADLs. The assessment documented the resident was frequently incontinent of bladder, occasionally incontinent of bowel, and required supervised bathing. A quarterly assessment dated [DATE], documented the resident was cognitively intact and needed extensive assistance with most ADLs. The assessment documented the resident was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder, and totally dependent with bathing. A significant change assessment dated [DATE], had been started but was not complete as of 03/29/23. On 03/29/23 at 5:40 p.m., the MDS coordinator…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-03 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately reflected residents' status for five (#25, 30, 36, 52 and #57) of 24 sampled residents whose assessments were reviewed. The facility failed to accurately assess: a. wandering for Res #30 and #52. b. falls for Res #25 and #57. c. skin conditions for Res #25 and #36. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report documented 56 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Res #30 had diagnoses which included Alzheimer's disease. A significant change assessment, dated 01/20/23, documented the resident's cognition was severly impaired and did not have wandering behaviors. On 03/27/23 at 1:51 p.m., an observation was made of resident #30 wandering out of room [ROOM NUMBER] with a pillow and placed it in the common area. On 03/27/23 at 2:01 p.m., an observation was made of resident #30 wandering in and out of rooms on Hall 500. On 03/27/23 at 2:13 p.m., an observation was made of resident #30…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to develop comprehensive person-centered care plans related to nutrition/weight loss for two (#2 an #50) of two residents reviewed for nutrition. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report documented 56 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Res #50 had diagnoses which included adult failure to thrive, hypokalemia, Alzheimer's disease, congestive heart failure, and diabetes mellitus. The EHR documented, on 02/04/23, a weight of 140.6 lbs. The EHR documented, on 03/06/23, a weight of 130.4 lbs. A quarterly assessment, dated 03/19/23, documented the resident had severe impaired cognition and did not have a significant weight loss of over 5% in one month. A dietary note, dated 03/23/23, documented a significant weight loss and recommended Mighty Shakes three times a day to promote stable weight. The care plan did not include nutrition or the resident's weight loss. On 03/28/23 at 5:35 p.m., an observation was made of the resident sitting at the table picking at food on plate. The resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-03 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to revise care plans for five (#14, 25, 36, 52, and #57) of 18 sampled residents whose care plans were reviewed. The facility failed to revise or update care plans related to: a. falls for Res #14, 25, and #57, b. wounds for Res #25 and #36, and c. psychoactive medication for Res #52. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 56 residents resided at the facility. Findings: The facility's Fall Protocols Policy, dated 10/21/19, read in parts, .An incident investigation will be completed to determine root cause of fall .The care plan will be revised for any new fall prevention interventions .Fall intervention book will be updated immediately with fall intervention for staff reference . 1. Res #14's significant change assessment, dated 10/20/22, documented the resident's cognition was moderately impaired; had no behaviors; required the limited assistance of one person with bed mobility and locomotion on the unit with a w/c;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-04-03 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received interventions to maintain nutritional status within acceptable parameters for two (#2 and #50) of two residents sampled for nutritional status. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report documented 56 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Res #50 had diagnoses which included adult failure to thrive, hypokalemia, Alzheimer's disease, congestive heart failure, and diabetes mellitus. The weight record, dated 02/04/23, documented a weight of 140.6 lbs. The weight record, dated 03/06/23, documented a weight of 130.4 lbs. A quarterly assessment, dated 03/19/23, documented the resident had severe impaired cognition and did not have a significant weight loss of over 5% in one month. A dietary note, dated 03/23/23, documented a significant weight loss and recommended Mighty Shakes three times a day to promote stable weight. The care plan did not include nutrition or the resident's weight loss. On 03/28/23 at 5:35 p.m., an observation was made of the resident sitting at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-03 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered by the physician for two (#48 and #160) of five sampled residents whose medications were reviewed. The facility failed to ensure: a. the heart rate was monitored before administering heart medication for Res #48. b. medication was available and administered as ordered for Res #160. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents documented 56 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Res #48 had diagnoses which included hypertension, arthritis, depression, anxiety, insomnia, and Alzheimer's disease. A physician order, dated 01/18/23, documented diclofenac 75 mg two times a day for arthritis pain A physician order dated 01/19/23, documented trazodone 150 mg at bedtime for insomnia. An admission assessment, dated 01/24/23, documented the resident was severely impaired with cognition and received antipsychotic, antianxiety, and antidepressant medications. A physician order, dated 02/08/23, documented losartan potassium 100 mg one time a day for HTN. Hold if BP <110/50 or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-04-03 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the physician responded to a pharmacist medication regimen review for two (#48 and #52) of five residents sampled for medication regimen reviews. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report documented 56 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Resident #52 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A quarterly assessment, dated 01/04/23, documented the resident had severely impaired cognition and received psychotropic medication. A physician order, dated 12/06/22, documented to administer Trazodone 50 mg at bedtime for insomnia. A physician order, dated 01/17/23, documented to administer Trazodone 25 mg at bedtime for insomnia. A monthly pharmacist medication review, dated 01/24/23, documented a recommendation for a gradual dose reduction for Trazadone. There was no documentation the physician responded to the medication review. On 03/30/23 at 1:30 p.m., the DON stated she could find the physician response to the pharmacy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-04-03 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was palatable and at appetizing temperatures for one of one meal service observed. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents documented 56 residents resided in the facility. Findings: On 03/29/23 at 7:55 a.m., during the second kitchen tour breakfast was already on the steam table and no steam noted. DA #1 was ready to go serve the halls breakfast. She was asked to temp the food on the steam table. The eggs (only for one resident) was 155 degrees F, sausages 81.6 degrees F, waffles 150 degrees F, and oatmeal 182 degrees F. On 03/29/23 at 8:24 a.m., five meals were made and placed uncovered in the window pass on the 400 hall, seven more meals were made and placed uncovered in the window pass by 8:28 a.m., for a total of 12 meals in the window pass. On 03/29/23 at 8:29 a.m., a test tray was made and sat on the counter until the the meals were served to the residents on 400 hall. The temperature of the test tray was taken at 8:36 a.m. The waffle was 83.2 F, sausage 74.4 F, and the oatmeal was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food in a sanitary manner. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents documented 56 residents resided in the facility. Findings: On 03/27/23 at 12:50 p.m., an initial tour of the kitchen was conducted. The following was observed: a. cooked hamburger patties labeled patty melts were dated 03/24/23, b. a bag of biscuits were not labeled or dated. c. biscuits, cookies, and tater tots in the freezer were open to air, d. two cans of spinach were observed on the shelf not dated, e. a dented can of tomato sauce not dated, f. five cans of sliced apples, four cans of fruit mix, three cans of black-eyed peas were not dated, g. multiple pudding and Jell-O mixes not dated, h. cake mix packages not dated, i. chocolate cake mix open to air, j. fry mix and breadcrumbs open to air, and k. a large bag of Great Northern beans open to air. On 03/27/23 during the tour, the DM stated the biscuits were probably from this morning…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-04-03 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — pattern
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to have an effective administration to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. The administration failed to ensure: a. residents' code status were documented and the person with legal authority signed the DNR form. b. housekeeping and maintenance services were provided to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior. c. discharge notices contained the required components. d. residents were allowed to return to the facility after hospitalization if bed is available. e. comprehensive assessments were completed at least every 12 months. f. the facility failed to conduct a significant change assessment within 14 days after a change in condition. g. assessments accurately reflected residents' status. h. the OHCA was notified when residents received new serious mental illness diagnoses. i. comprehensive person-centered care plans were developed and revised. j. non-pressure skin lesions were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-03 · tag F0847 — pattern
    Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure: a. the arbitration agreement contained clear language related to the residents or their representatives were not required to sign the agreement as a condition of admission; and b. the arbitration agreement granted the resident or his or her representative the right to rescind the agreement within 30 calendar days of signing it for three (#9, 20, and #57) of three residents reviewed for arbitration agreements. c. there was evidence a resident representative had the legal authority to sign the binding arbitration agreement for one (#9) of three residents reviewed for arbitration agreements. The SSD identified 25 residents which resided in the facility and had entered into arbitration agreements on or after 09/16/19. Findings: 1. Res #9 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Voluntary Arbitration Agreement, signed by the resident's representative on 12/16/20, read in parts, .Please know you can choose care at another facility if you do not wish…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-04-03 · tag F0848 — pattern
    Provide a neutral and fair arbitration process and agree to arbitrator and venue.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the arbitration agreement provided for the selection of a neutral arbitrator agreed upon by both parties for three (#9, #20, and #57) of three residents reviewed for arbitration agreements. The SSD identified 25 residents which resided in the facility and had entered into arbitration agreements on or after 09/16/19. Findings: 1. Res #9 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Voluntary Arbitration Agreement, signed by the resident's representative, on 12/16/20, did not have language that specifically provided for the selection of a neutral arbitrator. On 03/31/23 at 9:33 a.m., the SSD stated the arbitration agreement had been updated by the facility's corporation with the required wording related to the neutral third party but she had not received the updated version of the agreement until now. On 03/31/23 at 3:08 p.m., the administrator stated he was not aware the facility did not have the updated version of arbitration agreement which allowed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-04-03 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to consistently monitor antibiotic use for one (#52) of five sampled residents whose medications were reviewed. The facility failed to evaluate the need for antibiotics prior to ordering and administering antibiotics. The MDS coordinator identified two residents currently on antibiotics. Findings: Res #52's physician order, dated 02/27/23, documented Macrobid 100 mg by mouth two times a day for seven days for urinary tract infection. The EHR was reviewed on 03/30/23 and there was not evidence of a UA being collected or signs or symptoms the resident was experiencing before being put on an antibiotic. On 03/30/23 at 5:33 p.m., the MDS Coordinator/Infection Preventionists stated she had taken over the antibiotic stewardship program since they moved another staff member to a sister facility. She stated she had not had the time to bring the monitoring up to date.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-03 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure: a. a copy of the discharge notice was sent to the representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman; b. the discharge notice was provided by the facility at least 30 days before the resident was discharged ; c. the mailing and email address and telephone number of the agency responsible for the protection and advocacy of individuals with a mental disorder established under the Protection and Advocacy for Mentally Ill Individuals Act was provided; and d. the discharge notice included the specific location to which the resident is to be transferred or discharged for one (#111) of three residents reviewed for discharges. The MDS coordinator identified 21 residents who had been discharged from the facility in the last six months. Findings: Res #111 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses which included Alzheimer's disease, delusional disorders, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, chronic pain, migraines,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-03 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure comprehensive assessments were completed at least every 12 months for one (#9) of 24 sampled residents whose assessments were reviewed. The facility census and condition report documented 56 residents lived in the facility. Findings: 1. Res #9's significant change assessment, dated 03/24/22, was completed. A quarterly assessment, dated 06/21/22, was completed. A quarterly assessment, dated 09/21/22, was completed. A quarterly assessment, dated 12/18/22, was completed. A quarterly assessment, dated 03/13/23, was completed. On 03/30/23 at 12:36 p.m., the MDS coordinator was made aware Res #9 did not have a comprehensive assessment at least every 12 months. She stated there should have been an annual instead of a quarterly on 03/13/23.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-03 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the OHCA of a resident with a new serious mental illness for one (#4) of one sampled residents reviewed for PASRR evaluations. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report documented 39 residents who received psychoactive medication. Findings: Res #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A PASRR level I was completed on 03/06/20 and documented the resident did not have a serious mental illness. The EHR documented Res #4 received a diagnosis of delusional disorders on 07/06/21. A PASRR level I was completed on 05/04/22 and documented the resident did not have a serious mental illness A significant change assessment, dated 01/03/23, documented the resident was moderately impaired with cognition; had physical and verbal behaviors toward others one to three days during the look back period; and did not have a PASRR II evaluation. On 03/29/23 at 4:50 p.m., the admissions director stated he would have to look and find out if the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to obtain diagnosis, assess, and monitor skin lesion for one (#25) of two residents reviewed for skin issues. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents documented 56 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Res #25's quarterly assessment, dated 10/31/22, documented the resident was severely impaired with cognition, required extensive assistance with most ADLs, and had no skin issues. A annual assessment, dated 01/23/23, documented the resident was severely impaired with cognition, required extensive assistance with ADLs, and had no skin issues. A physician order, dated 03/14/23, documented to clean with normal saline, pat dry, and apply dressing PRN for drainage for a forehead wound. The weekly skin observations in the EHR documented no skin issues or the report could not be viewed. A care plan, last revised 12/06/22, documented skin impairment related to fragile skin. The care plan documented to see the MAR/TAR for current regimen and administer treatment as ordered. The care plan documented to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-03 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to provide pain management medications for one (#160) of five residents sampled for medication review. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents documented 56 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Res #160 had diagnoses which included CHF, diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease, and dementia. A nurse note, dated 03/23/23, documented the resident had a fall while transferring self from the w/c to the recliner in the living room. The note documented the resident sustained an abrasion to the right side of the the forehead which appeared to be a carpet burn. The March 2023 TAR, documented on 03/25/23, the residents pain level was a seven out of ten. The resident did not have any pain medication documented on the MAR or a physician order for pain medicine. An admission assessment, dated 03/27/23, was in progress. On 03/27/23 at 2:31 p.m., Res #160 stated he needed some relief as he had been hurting all afternoon in his shoulders and back. He stated he had told the nurse. He stated his pain was at least…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-05-30 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident had medication administered as prescribed for one (#6) of six sampled residents whose medications were reviewed. The resident census and condition report documented 58 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #6 was admitted with diagnoses of dementia with behavioral disturbance, depression, and anxiety. An EMR, dated 05/19/19, documented the resident was to receive Buspirone 15 mg twice a day. A MAR, dated May 2019, documented the resident's medication was scheduled to be given twice a day. The MAR documented the resident did not receive the medication on 5/19/19. The MAR documented a 9 was in the box of both morning and evening doses. The MAR documented the 9 stood for see other/progress note. An eMAR progress note, dated 5/19/19 at 8:45 a.m., documented Buspirone 15 mg, was to be given one tablet, by mouth, two times a day for anxiety/agitation. The progress note documented the medication was awaiting delivery. On 5/19/19 at 11:40 a.m., resident #6 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-05-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure cross contamination did not occur during wound care for one (#55) of two sampled residents with wounds. The resident census and condition report documented there were two residents in the facility with a pressure ulcer. Findings: Resident #55 had diagnoses which included diabetes mellitus. An admission assessment, dated 05/10/19, documented the resident was severely impaired cognitively, was independent with most activities of daily living, was always continent of bowel and bladder, and had no pressure ulcer. A general progress note, dated 05/18/19, documented the nurse observed a blister on the resident's right foot second digit, inner right foot near the resident's right great toe, and a large blister was observed between the left great toe and the 2nd digit. The note documented the physician and family were notified and new orders were received to use skin prep to the affected areas and cover with a light dressing two times a day and as needed. On 05/19/19 at 11:15 a.m., LPN #1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$15,239 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $15,239 — penalty dated 2024-05-14

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to EMERALD HEALTHCARE — 14 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.3-0.3 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 51.5-0.5 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 51.8+0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 52.0≈ chain avg
The other 13 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.3★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
EHC CLAREMORE OPERATIONS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 06/04/2018
JW OKLAHOMA HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST50%since 06/04/2018
YCOK HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST50%since 06/04/2018
CHAFETZ, YISROELIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 11/01/2018
WALDEN, JACOBIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 11/01/2018
KINDLE, DARLENEIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 11/01/2018

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$5.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-11.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$992K
Related-party expense17% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 80%Medicare 4%Other / private 16%

About 80% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $992K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$283per resident / day
operating cost
$8,594per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$254per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Oklahoma Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Oklahoma
$7,026/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,756/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,150/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 375553. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-05-14, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next