Emerald Care Center Claremore
2800 North Hickory Street, Claremore, OK 74017 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 129 certified beds · (918) 341-4365 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (49) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (56%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- about 20% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 29.1% | 13.6% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.8% | 3.3% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 1.9% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.3% | 2.8% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 7.4% | 3.4% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.0% | 4.7% | 3.3% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 36.1% | 13.7% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 22.3% | 25.7% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 77.9% | 94.6% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.8% | 4.7% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 36.0% | 17.1% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 19.6% | 17.5% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.6% | 1.8% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 6.5% | 74.1% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 30.4% | 27.3% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 11.4% | 16.6% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.81 | 2.31 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.53 | 2.96 | 1.80 | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
53.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 125 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 38.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 67 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 49% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 53.2%CMS range 40.8–61.7 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.7%CMS range 8.4–16.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 38.8% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 41.8% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 31.3% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 98.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 94.7% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 97.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.8% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 9.3%CMS range 6.0–13.5 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.11 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 129 beds and averages 103.9 residents a day — about 81% occupied, or roughly 25 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.43 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.23 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.44 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.30 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.48 on weekdays — 5% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.26 to 0.16 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
49 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 39 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-07-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure bathing was provided for 3 (#3, #4 and #6) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The DON identified 106 residents resided in the facility.Findings: A care plan for Resident #3, dated 05/18/26, showed the resident had a functional deficit with current activities of daily living related to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus, and congestive heart failure, and required assistance with personal hygiene. An undated Bath List showed Resident #3 was to receive baths weekly on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. Shower Sheets for Resident #3 showed the resident received baths on the following dates:a. 06/03/26, andb. 06/17/26. 2. An undated Bath List showed Resident #4 was to receive baths weekly on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. Shower Sheets for Resident #4 showed the resident received baths on the following dates:a. 06/01/26, b. 06/10/26, andc. 06/19/26. 3. A care plan for Resident #6, dated 06/16/26, showed the resident had a functional deficit with current activities of daily…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-07-02 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors for 1 (#1) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for medication administration. The DON stated 106 residents received medications from the facility.Findings: A policy titled Medication Administration and General Guidelines, dated 2021, read in part, medications are administered at the time they are prepared .observes the resident take the medications. A progress note for Resident #1, dated 06/26/26 at 6:40 p.m., showed the resident had drunk coffee with medications in it that belonged to another resident. A medication administration record for Resident #2, dated 06/26/26, showed Resident #1 received the following medications: Rexulti (a medication for agitation) half of a 4 mg tablet, buspirone HCI (a medication for anxiety) 10 mg, and alprazolam (a medication for anxiety) 0.5 mg.On 07/01/26 at 2:38 p.m., the DON stated medications should always be observed during medication administration to ensure the resident has taken all of their medication, as well as ensuring…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-12-18 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespreadEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to follow the dietician approved menu for 3 of 3 meal services observed.The administrator identified 112 residents who received their meals from the kitchen. One resident received nutrition and hydration solely through a feeding tube. Findings:On 12/15/25 at 12:15 p.m., serving of the lunch meal was observed. The lunch meal consisted of meatballs, mashed potatoes with gravy, boiled mix vegetables, and yellow cake with cream cheese frosting.On 12/16/25 at 11:45 a.m., preparation of the lunch meal was observed. The lunch meal consisted of kielbasa sausage, mashed potatoes, creamed corn, and Jello.On 12/16/25 at 4:50 p.m., a sample dinner tray was provided from the kitchen per request. The dinner meal consisted of beef pot pie, boiled squash, cornbread, and peach cake.A Food Preparation Guidelines policy, dated 11/2017, read in part, The cook, or designee, should prepare menu items following the facility's written menus and standardized recipes.A Week 3 facility menu, dated 2025 through 2026, showed residents would…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-18 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food served from the kitchen was attractive and palatable for 1 of 1 test trays obtained. The administrator identified 112 residents who received their meals from the kitchen. One resident received nutrition and hydration solely through a feeding tube.Findings:On 12/16/25 at 4:50 p.m., a dinner tray was sampled for palatability. The dinner meal consisted of beef pot pie, boiled squash, cornbread, and peach cake. The meal was observed as one large scoop of mixed vegetables and ground beef topped with slightly browned biscuits. The scoop of pot pie was surrounded by water and pieces of squash. The pieces of squash were mushy in texture and bland to taste. The water from the boiled squash had soaked into the biscuit topping for the pot pie. The biscuit topping was soggy in consistency and bland in taste.A Food Preparation Guidelines policy, dated 11/2017, read in part, Food should be palatable, attractive, and at the proper temperature, as determined by the type of food, to ensure resident's satisfaction…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an advance directive acknowledgment form had been completed for 2 (#2 and #11) of 23 sampled residents reviewed for advance directives. The administrator identified 112 residents resided in the facility. Findings:A policy titled Advance directive policy and procedure, dated 01/2024, read in part, Upon admission, identify if the resident has an advanced directive and if not, determine if the resident wishes to formulate an advanced directive.All advanced directive document copies will be obtained and located in the resident chart.1.A physician's order, dated 12/09/24, showed Resident #2 was a full code. An order summary report, dated 12/16/25, showed Resident #2 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. There was no advanced directive acknowledgment form located in the medical record. 2.A physician's order, dated 09/08/25, showed Resident #11 was a full code.An order summary report, dated 12/16/25, showed Resident #11 admitted to the facility on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a fall with major injury was reported to the OSDH for 1 (#97) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for falls.The administrator identified 112 residents resided in the facility. Findings:A document titled Long Term Care Reportable Incidents - Regulatory Requirements, dated 06/28/22, read in part, All reports to the Department shall be made within twenty-four (24) hours of the reportable incident unless otherwise noted .The facility shall report to the Department incidents that result in: fractures, injury requiring treatment at a hospital, a physician's diagnosis of closed head injury or concussion, or head injuries that require more than first aid.A November 2025 medication administration record showed Resident #97 was taking Warfarin Sodium 4mg (a blood thinner) every Monday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday, Saturday, and Sunday. Resident #97 was taking Warfarin Sodium 2mg every Tuesday.A Nurse's Note, dated 12/01/25, read in part, Head to toe…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0730 — isolatedObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to perform annual nurse aide competency reviews for two (CNA #3 and CNA #4) of 2 sampled employee files reviewed for annual competencies.The administrator identified 112 residents resided in the facility. Findings:1.An undated staff roster showed CNA #4 was hired on 10/13/23. There was no documentation an annual competency review was completed for 2025.2.An undated staff roster showed CNA #3 was hired on 04/17/24. There was no documentation an annual competency review was completed for 2025.On 12/17/25 at 10:13 a.m., the HR director was asked for annual competencies for CNA #3 and CNA #4. The HR director stated, We may not have them. We try to get them done, but sometimes we don't.On 12/17/25 at 10:23 a.m., the HR director stated, We do not have reviews for those two CNAs. We will have them completed in January or February. A policy for annual competencies was requested and the HR director stated they did not have one.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was administered a medication as ordered by the physician for 1 (#124) of 6 sampled residents reviewed for medication administration.The administrator identified 112 residents resided in the facility. Findings:An admission assessment, dated 11/12/25, showed Resident #124 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of thrombocytopenia, a deficiency of platelets in the blood. A Physician's Order, dated 11/14/25, showed Resident #124 was prescribed eltrombopag olamine oral tablet, (a platelet stimulating agent), 50mg tablet by mouth at bedtime for thrombocytopenia.A medication administration record, dated November 2025, showed Resident #124 was not administered eltrombopag olamine oral tablet on 11/14/25.A Nurse Note, dated 11/14/25, read in part, Pharmacy won't dispense.A medication administration record, dated November 2025, showed Resident #124 was not administered eltrombopag olamine oral tablet on 11/15/25.An Incident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy recommendations for adding hold parameters to blood pressure medications were followed for 1 (#11) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medication. The administrator identified 112 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A policy titled Drug Regimen Review-With Consultant Agreement only, dated 2021, read in part, Drug Regimen Review consists of reviewing and analyzing prescribed medication therapy and medication use, including nursing documentation of medication ordering and administration.Findings and recommendations are reported to the Administrator, Director of Nursing, the Primary Physician, and the Medical Director, where appropriate.Nursing personnel provide a written response to the review within two weeks after the report is received. A physician's order, dated 09/05/25, showed nifedipine extended release (blood pressure medication) 24 hour 30 mg at bedtime for blood pressure. The order did not have parameters for administration. A Director of Nursing Report (pharmacy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided the right to refuse medication for two (#1 and #2) of three sampled residents reviewed for abuse. A daily census record, dated 11/15/24, documented 103 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The facility's Resident Rights policy, dated November 2017, read in part, The resident has the right to be informed of, participate in, his or her treatment, including .The right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate and [sic] advance directive. 1. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included Alzheimer's disease. An Incident Report Form, dated 11/09/24, documented LPN #1 had allegedly forced Resident #1 to take medication against their will. An undated attachment to the incident report documented the facility staff had determined the incident had occurred and LPN #1's employment had been terminated. A printed copy of an email from visitor #1 to the facility ADON, dated 11/11/24, documented visitor #1 had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 39 citations
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-27 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was not physically restrained for one (#2) of three sampled residents reviewed for abuse. A daily census record, dated 11/15/24, documented 103 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The facility's Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation: policy, dated November 2017, read in part, The facility must ensure the resident is free of from physical or chemical restraints imposed for the purpose of discipline or convenience and that are not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms. Resident #2 Resident #2 had diagnoses which included vascular dementia. An Incident Report Form, dated 11/09/24, documented LPN #1 had allegedly forced Resident #2 to take medication against their will. An undated attachment to the incident report documented the facility staff had determined LPN #1 had physically restrained Resident #2's arms while attempting to administer medications to the resident. The document stated the facility staff determined the incident had occurred and LPN #1's employment had been terminated. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-27 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a chemical restraint was not used to keep a resident from repeatedly standing from their wheelchair for one (#2) of three sampled residents reviewed for abuse. A daily census record, dated 11/15/24, documented 103 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The facility's Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation: policy, dated November 2017, read in part, The facility must ensure the resident is free of from physical or chemical restraints imposed for the purpose of discipline or convenience and that are not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms. 1. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included Alzheimer's disease. A narcotic count sheet for lorazepam (antianxiety medication) 2 ml syringes for Resident #2, documented CMA #2 signed out one syringe of the medication on 11/08/24 at 6:00 p.m. An Incident Report Form, dated 11/09/24, documented LPN #1 had allegedly forced Resident #2 to take medication against their will. An undated attachment to the incident report documented the facility staff had determined the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an employee reported an allegation of abuse in the mandated time frame for one (#2) of three sampled residents reviewed for abuse. A daily census record, dated 11/15/24, documented 103 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The facility's Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation: policy, dated November 2017, read in part, Ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not late than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including the State Survey Agency and adult protective services where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities) in accordance with State law through…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed for one (#3) of three sampled residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The administrator identied 103 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A facility policy titled Care Plan Process, revised 9/2019, read in part, The plan of care must describe the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the residents' highest practicable physical, mental, and social well-being .Purpose .To ensure a care plan will be developed that is appropriate for each resident's needs and/or wishes based on assessment and reassessment. Resident #3 has diagnoses which included a pressure ulcer to the sacral region and hypertension. A physician order, dated 11/13/24, documented Resident #3 was to receive wound care to the coccyx/sacrum three times a week. A quarterly assessment, dated 11/20/24, documented Resident #3 had an unstageable pressure ulcer. On 11/26/24 at 11:15 a.m., a pressure ulcer was observed on Resident #3's sacrum. A review of Resident #3's care plan did…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure catheter bags were not on the floor for one (# 2) of four sampled residents reviewed for catheters. The roster matrix, date printed 11/15/24, documented nine residents in the facility had catheters. Findings: Resident #12 had diagnoses which included obstructive and reflux uropathy. A quarterly assessment, dated 09/09/24, documented Resident #12 had an indwelling urinary catheter. On 11/25/24 at 1:50 p.m., Resident #12 was observed seated in a recliner. Their catheter bag was observed on the floor next to the recliner. On 11/26/24 at 10:30 a.m., Resident #12 was observed seated in a recliner. Their catheter bag was observed on the floor next to the recliner. On 11/26/24 at 12:35 p.m., RN #1 stated catheter bags should not be on the ground. On 11/26/24 at 12:45 p.m., the ADON stated catheter bags should not be allowed to touch the floor.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-16 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify a resident's representative when a new antipsychotic medication had been ordered for one (#3) of five sampled residents reviewed for notifications of change. A resident listing report, dated 10/14/24, documented 109 residents resided at the facility. Findings: A facility policy titled Notification of Change Policy, dated 05/2017, read in part, It is the policy of this facility that changes is resident's condition or treatments are immediately shared with the resident and/or the resident's representative, according to their authority, and reported to the attending physician or delegate (hereafter designated as the physician). Resident #3 had diagnoses which included delusional disorder. A physician's medication order, dated 01/11/24, documented Resident #3 was to be administered risperidone (antipsychotic medication) 0.5 mg tablet by mouth at bedtime for delusional disorder. The order was documented as discontinued on 06/13/24. A physician's medication order, dated 06/14/24, documented Resident #3 was to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-16 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation into a missing container of narcotic pain medications. A resident listing report, dated 10/14/24, documented 109 residents resided at the facility. Findings: A facility policy titled Controlled Medication - Ordering and Receipt, dated 2001, documented medications were to be checked upon arrival to ensure all medications on the packing slip were received. A pharmacy manifest, dated 08/23/24, documented 168 tablets of Oxycodone/APAP (pain medication) 10-325 mg was delivered to the facility and represented a 28-day supply of the medication. The manifest was signed by facility nurse LPN #1. On 10/14/24 at 11:23 a.m., the ADON stated they had investigated 60 unaccounted for Oxycodone/APAP 10-325 mg tablets. They stated they had attempted to reorder the medication on 09/13/24 and were informed by the pharmacy that it was too soon to reorder. They stated that was when they realized there were missing pills. They stated they attempted to contact LPN #1 since that time, but they had not returned…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to assess and promptly treat a resident following an unobserved fall for one (#6) of two sampled residents reviewed for falls. A resident listing report, dated 10/14/24, documented 109 residents resided at the facility. Findings: Resident #6 had diagnoses which included hemiplegia and hemiparesis. A Falls Management policy and procedure, dated 04/2015, read in part, In the event a resident has fallen and/or is found on the ground, a complete head-to-toe assessment must be performed prior to moving the resident unless life-threatening safety concerns are present. Remain with the resident while calling for assistance, if at all possible. A progress note, dated 04/15/24 at 10:36 a.m., documented Resident #6 complained of pain in their right hip when they moved their right leg. The note documented the nurse observed the resident's right leg externally rotated and the resident was unable to straighten their leg. It further documented a nurse practitioner was in the building and ordered the resident to be sent to an emergency room.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-16 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to prevent a medication administration record from erroneously recording a resident received a medication when the medication was not available for administration for one (#3) of six sampled residents reviewed for medication administration. A resident listing report, dated 10/14/24, documented 109 residents resided at the facility. Findings: A MAR, dated 06/01/24 through 06/30/24, documented Resident #3 had been administered Nuplazid (antipsychotic medication) 11 times between 06/14/24 and 06/30/24. A MAR, dated 07/01/24 through 07/31/24, documented Resident #3 had been administered Nuplazid five times between 07/01/24 and 07/26/24. On 10/15/24 at 9:30 a.m., CMA #1 stated they had reviewed the June and July MARs for Resident #3 and found they had documented they had administered Nuplazid to the resident on multiple dates. They stated those entries were in error as that medication had never arrived in the building because of an insurance issue. On 10/15/24 at 9:53 a.m., the ADON stated documents from their contracted pharmacy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-05-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to: a. ensure scoops were not stored inside the bins of flour and corn starch for two of two bins observed; b. ensure foods stored in the refrigerator were labeled and dated for one of one walk in refrigerators observed; c. ensure the dish machine reached minimum specifications for sanitation for one of one dish machines observed; d. ensure the ice machine was maintained in a sanitary manner for one of two ice machines observed; e. ensure the proper use of hair restraints, including facial hair; f. ensure infection control was maintained when plating meals for one (the noon meal) of one meal service observed; and g. ensure kitchen equipment, surfaces, and floors were maintained in a sanitary manner. The ADON identified 111 residents who received meals from the kitchen. Findings: The Food Preparation Guidelines policy, dated November 2017, read in part, .Food should be protected from contamination while being stored . The Ice Machine and Ice Storage Chests policy, dated January 2024, read in parts, .Ice machines…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed for three (#40, 55, and #64) of 22 sampled residents whose care plans were reviewed. The DON identified 114 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Resident #40 had diagnoses which included dementia. The significant change assessment, dated 05/02/24, documented the resident was severely impaired in cognition for daily decision making and wandered one to three days during the look back period. On 05/13/24 at 10:04 a.m., Resident #40 was observed to wander, in their wheel chair, on the memory care unit. Resident #40 was observed to be redirected out of another resident's room by staff. 2. Resident #55 had diagnoses which included dementia. The quarterly assessment, dated 04/29/24, documented the resident was severely impaired in cognition for daily decision making. On 05/13/24 at 10:17 a.m., Resident #40 was observed to wander, in their wheel chair, on the memory care unit. 3. Resident #64 had diagnoses which included dementia. The admission assessment,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure chemicals/medications were secure on the memory care unit for four (#40, 55, 64, and #98) of four sampled residents who were reviewed for wandering and failed to implement fall interventions for one (#96) of four sampled residents who were reviewed for falls. The ADON identified nine residents who wandered on the memory care unit and 26 residents who experienced falls in the past 30 days. Findings: The MSDS for Lantiseptic (a skin barrier cream), read in part, .Irritating if placed in eyes or if ingested . The MSDS for peri wash, read in part, .Irritating if placed in eyes or if ingested . A Falls Management policy, revised 01/24, read in part, .A Risk Reduction, Falls and Injuries Program will be used to assess residents/patients to determine fall risk factors. The interdisciplinary team identifies and implements appropriate interventions to reduce the risk of falls or injuries while maximizing dignity and independence . 1. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-17 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — patternProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure interventions were in place to prevent the unnecessary weight loss of three (#12, 21, #65) of four sampled residents reviewed for food/nutrition. The ADON identified three residents with significant weight loss. Findings: 1. Resident #12 had diagnoses which included morbid obesity and malignant neoplasm of breast. A care plan, dated 04/03/24, documented Resident #12 had a risk for malnutrition and would maintain adequate nutritional and hydration status including stable weight, no signs or symptoms of malnutrition or dehydration through the review date. The care plan documented to develop an activity program that included exercise and mobility, and to offer activities of choice to help divert attention from food. On 01/13/24 at 8:27 p.m., a Nutrition/Dietary Note, read in part, admission nutrition assessment completed. Diet is Regular with variable po intake that is fair overall. Stage 3 pressure ulcer to left heel and unstageable DTI [deep tissue injury] to right heel. Recommend Pro-Heal 30 mL [milliliters] BID…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-17 · tag F0710 — patternObtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified of weight loss for two (#12 and #21) of four sampled residents who were reviewed for weight loss. The ADON identified three residents who had significant weight loss. Findings: Resident #12 had diagnoses which included morbid obesity and malignant neoplasm of breast. A care plan, revised 04/03/24, documented Resident #12 had a risk for malnutrition and would maintain adequate nutritional and hydration status including stable weight, no signs or symptoms of malnutrition or dehydration through the review date. The care plan documented to develop an activity program that included exercise and mobility, and to offer activities of choice to help divert attention from food. On 01/13/24 at 8:27 p.m., a Nutrition/Dietary Note, read in part, admission nutrition assessment completed. Diet is Regular with variable po intake that is fair overall. Stage 3 pressure ulcer to left heel and unstageable DTI [deep tissue injury] to right…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-17 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure adequate staffing to ensure bathing was completed according to resident preferences for two (#73 and #93) of five sampled residents who were reviewed for ADL care. The ADON identified 22 residents who required assistance with bathing. Findings: 1. Resident #73 had diagnoses which included diabetes type two and depression. A quarterly assessment, dated 03/12/24, documented Resident #73 required substantial/maximal assistance of staff for most ADLs and bathing was documented as not applicable. Review of the electronic clinical record and the shower sheets, dated 04/15/24 through 05/15/24, documented Resident #73 had received/was offered four showers out of 13 opportunities. On 05/13/24 at 1:55 p.m., Resident #73 stated they only received one shower per week but wanted more. 2. Resident #93 had diagnoses which included hemiplegia and stoke. A shower sheet, dated 04/01/24, documented I did not have time, I was the only aide for the reason Resident #93's scheduled shower was not completed. A quarterly assessment, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-17 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure adequate monitoring of side effects for residents who received antipsychotic medications for two (#4 and #64) of five sampled residents who were reviewed for unnecessary medications. The ADON identified 20 residents who received an antipsychotic medication. Findings: 1. Resident #64 had diagnoses which included dementia. A physician's order, dated 04/15/24, documented Resident #64 was ordered Olanzapine (an antipsychotic medication) 2.5 mg twice daily. Review of the electronic clinical record not reveal monitoring for side effects related to the use of antipsychotic medication. On 05/17/24 at 11:09 a.m., the DON stated they previously documented side effect monitoring on the MAR/TAR but they removed it because it was the standard of practice to monitor for side effects of medications. They stated they documented in the progress notes if a resident experienced any side effect from any medication. The DON stated they assessed for tardive dyskinesia by conducting an AIMS assessment every 90 days. They stated the charge…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-17 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — patternProvide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure dental needs were provided for two (#6 and #73) of two sampled residents who were reviewed for dental needs. The administrator identified 114 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Resident #66 had diagnoses which included hemiplegia, seizures, and anxiety. A progress note from the dentist, dated 03/07/23, documented the resident should be seen by an oral surgeon to extract a cracked tooth. On 05/14/24 at 10:56 a.m., Resident #66 stated they had a cracked tooth on their right lower jaw which caused pain while eating. On 05/17/24 at 9:28 a.m., the social services director stated they had not seen a dental referral for Resident #66 to see an oral surgeon. They stated they did not know if the appointment had been made since they were recently employed by the facility. On 05/17/24 at 9:30 a.m., the DON stated the charge nurse should give the information for a referral to the receptionist, who would then make the appointment and transportation arrangements. The DON stated ultimately it was their responsibility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-17 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was provided in a palatable and attractive manner. The ADON identified 112 residents who ate food from the kitchen. Findings: On 05/13/24 at 1:42 p.m., Resident #73 stated the food was cold. On 05/14/24 at 2:00 p.m., Resident #96 stated the food was delivered cold to their room. On 05/17/24 at 8:31 a.m., CNA #5 delivered styrofoam drinks to burgandy hall, uncovered, and placed on drink cart. The drinks were milk. On 05/17/24 at 9:09 a.m., a meal cart arrived on burgandy hall. On 05/17/24 at 9:10 a.m., staff began to pass meal trays on burgandy hall. On 05/17/24 at 9:11 a.m., meals were observed to be served on styrofoam plates with plastic covers and no heated bottoms. The milk on drink cart was observed to be uncovered and not on ice. Staff delivered the milk with the food to residents. On 05/17/24 at 9:14 a.m., the meal cart was observed to be left open during meal pass. The staff were not observed to sanitize hands between passing trays. On 05/17/24 at 9:17 a.m., a cleaning cart was observed to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-17 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure an effective pest control program in resident rooms, the dining room, and the kitchen. The DON identified 114 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: The Pest Control Program policy, dated January 2024, read in part, .Facility will maintain an effective pest control program that eradicates and contains common household pests . The Maintenance Request Log, dated 03/06/24, documented Resident #7 complained there had been a roach in their bed and pest control was contacted. The Maintenance Request Log, dated 03/10/24, documented roaches were observed in room [ROOM NUMBER] and pest control was contacted. The Maintenance Request Log, dated 03/30/24, documented ants in room [ROOM NUMBER]. The response was documented as done. The Maintenance Request Log, dated 03/31/24, documented ants in room [ROOM NUMBER]. The response was documented as done. The Maintenance Request Log, dated 03/31/24, documented ants in room [ROOM NUMBER] and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff provided dignity with dining for residents who required assistance with meals for two (morning and noon meal) of two meals observed for dining. The ADON identified 13 residents who were dependent on staff for eating. Findings: 1. Resident #65 had diagnoses which included Alzheimer's disease. The quarterly assessment, dated 04/09/24, documented the resident was severely impaired in cognition for daily decision making and required supervision/touch assist of staff for eating. On 05/13/24 at 9:33 a.m., CNA #1 was observed to stand and assist Resident #65 with the morning meal. 2. Resident #7 had diagnoses which included aphasia. The quarterly assessment, dated 03/13/24, documented the resident was severely impaired in cognition for daily decision making and was dependent on staff for eating. On 05/13/24 at 12:32 p.m., CNA #2 was observed to stand and assist Resident #7 with the noon meal. On 05/17/24 at 10:01 a.m., CNA #1 stated they had not sat to assist Resident #65 with their meal because there…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-17 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were safe to self-administer medication for two (#22 and #31) of two sampled residents who were reviewed for self-administering medication. The administrator identified 114 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An undated policy titled Bedside Storage of Medications, read in part, .A written order for the bedside storage of medication is placed in the resident's medical record .Lockable drawers or cabinets are required . 1. Resident #22 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included dementia. On 05/13/24 at 9:43 a.m., a bottle of medicated powder was observed on the resident's night stand. The label on the medicated powder documented to keep out of reach of children. On 05/13/24 at 11:00 a.m., the DON stated the medicated powder was to be secured and not kept at the resident's bedside for self-administration. On 05/17/24 at 2:49 p.m., LPN #1 stated the resident did not have an order for medicated powder and did not know where the powder came from. LPN #1 stated when they…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-17 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an accurate code status was documented for one (#67) and residents were offered the choice to formulate an advanced directive for one (#96) of two sampled residents reviewed for advanced directives. The administrator reported 112 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A policy titled Advance Directive Policy and Procedure, dated [DATE], read in part It is the policy of the facility to establish, implement and maintain written policies and procedures for advance directive .The resident has the right and the facility will assist the resident to formulate an advance directive at their option .The facility will inform and provide resident with a written description of the facility's policy to implement advance directives .Resident has the right to accept, request, refuse and/or discontinue medical and surgical treatment and to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research .Resident choices will be incorporated into…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure ADLs were provided according to the care plan for two (#73 and #93) of two sampled residents for ADLs. The ADON identified 22 residents who required assistance with bathing. Findings: 1. Resident #73 had diagnoses which included diabetes type two and depression. An annual assessment, dated 09/24/23, documented Resident #73 required physical help of one person for bathing. A quarterly assessment, dated 03/12/24, documented Resident #73 bathing as not applicable, dressing required maximum assistance and for toileting Resident #73 was dependent for assistance. Review of the electronic clinical record and the shower sheets, dated 04/15/24 through 05/15/24, documented Resident #73 had received/four showers out of 13 opportunities. On 05/13/24 at 1:55 p.m., Resident #73 stated they only received one shower per week, but wanted more. On 05/16/24 at 3:21 p.m., CNA #4 stated showers were offered every other day, but did not know when the last shower was offered. On 05/16/24 at 3:26 p.m., LPN #4 stated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-17 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure appointments were scheduled for one (#73) of one resident sampled for vision appointments. The ADON identified 114 residents resided at the facility. Findings: Resident #73 had diagnoses which included diabetes type two, nicotine dependence, and hypertension. On 02/28/23 at 4:21 p.m., a social services note, documented Resident #73 had requested an eye and dental appointment through the [name removed] clinic. The note documented social services had provided the request to the receptionist to schedule the appointment and arrange transportation. On 05/13/24 at 1:54 p.m., Resident #73 stated they had not seen an eye doctor since admission. On 05/17/24 at 9:28 a.m., the social services director stated they were responsible for ensuring appointments were arranged. On 05/17/24 at 9:29 a.m., the DON stated the nurse on duty enters the order in the electronic record and provides the request to the receptionist to arrange the appointments. They stated it was ultimately their responsibility to see that it as followed through.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-17 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure pureed food was prepared to meet the needs of the resident for one (the noon meal) of one meal observed during meal preparation. The ADON identified five residents who received a puree diet. Findings: The Therapeutic Diet Orders policy, dated January 2024, read in part, .To assure that residents receive and consume foods in the appropriate form . On 05/14/24 at 11:52 a.m., dietary aide #3 was observed to puree the noon meal. The taco meat was observed to be grainy and have pieces of meat which remained after it was pureed. The flour tortillas were observed to be lumpy and have chewable pieces of tortilla which remained after it was pureed. The pureed taco meat and the pureed tortillas were not a smooth consistency and were placed on the steam table for serving. On 05/14/24 at 12:19 p.m., dietary aide #1 plated a pureed diet for Resident #22 and placed it on the hall cart. On 05/14/24 at 12:23 p.m., dietary aide #5 began wheeling the meal cart out of the kitchen for service. Dietary aide #1 and the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-17 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolatedDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure garbage cans were available at the handwashing sink and garbage cans had lids in the kitchen. The ADON identified 111 residents who received meals from the kitchen. Findings: The Disposal of Garbage and Refuse policy, dated January 2024, read in part, .Garbage should be disposed of in refuse containers, which have plastic liners and lids . The Nutrition Services Visit, dated 03/02/24, read in parts, .Areas for Corrective Action .No lids on large trash cans .Action Plan .Keep lids on all trash cans . The Nutrition Services Visit, dated 04/02/24, read in parts, .Areas for Corrective Action .No lids on large trash cans .Action Plan .Keep lids on all trash cans . On 05/13/24 at 8:29 a.m., a garbage can was not observed to be at the handwashing sink. Three large barrel-type garbage cans, without lids, were observed across from the handwashing sink near the stove, at the service line, and in the food preparation area. On 05/14/24 at 11:50 a.m., a garbage can was not observed to be at the handwashing sink.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-01 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to follow infection control practices during wound care for four (#4, 6, 7, and #8) of five sampled residents whose wound care was observed. The administrator identified 106 residents resided in the facility. Twenty-three residents received wound treatments. Findings: 1. Resident #8 had diagnoses that included MASD to sacrum. A physicians' order, dated 04/16/24, documented treatment order to cleanse with NS, pat dry, and apply clotrimazole cream then zinc and large foam dressing daily. On 04/29/24 at 4:12 p.m., RN #1 was observed during wound care for Resident #8. Resident #8's wound had no dressing on it when we arrived at their bedside. When cleaning the wound RN #1 wiped back and forth around the area of skin breakdown five times using the same gauze soaked in NS. 2. Resident #4 had diagnoses that included stage 2 pressure ulcer to sacrum A physicians' order, dated 04/11/24, documented treatment order to cleanse with NS, pat dry, and apply calcium alginate and Medi honey with foam bandage daily. On 04/29/24 at 4:15 p.m., RN…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-01 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to update the care plan with significant changes in condition for one (#2) of five sampled residents whose care plans were reviewed. The Administrator identified 106 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A 'Care Plan Process' policy, revised 09/2019, read in parts, .Responsibilities of the Interdisciplinary Team .complete a care plan review after each PPS Assessment for Managed Care residents to ensure the care plan is updated as the resident's status changes . Resident #2 had diagnoses that included senile degeneration of the brain and dementia. A physician's order, dated 11/06/23, documented Resident #2 was to receive a regular diet, pureed texture and thin consistency. A Significant Change MDS assessment, dated 11/19/23, documented Resident #2 required a mechanically altered diet and Hospice care. A physician's order, dated 12/12/23, documented Resident #2 was to be admitted to hospice as of 11/06/23 with diagnoses of senile degeneration. A review of Resident #2's care plan did not show it had been updated to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to follow enhanced barrier precautions during wound care for two (#4 and #8) of five sampled residents whose wound care was observed. The administrator identified 106 residents resided in the facility. Twenty-three residents received wound treatments. Findings: 1. Resident #8 had diagnoses that included MASD to sacrum. On 04/29/24 at 4:12 p.m., RN #1 was observed during wound care for Resident #8. 2. Resident #4 had diagnoses that included stage 2 pressure ulcer to sacrum On 04/29/24 at 4:15 p.m., RN #1 was observed during wound care for Resident #4. RN #1 did not don a gown before providing wound care to Resident #4 nor Resident #8. On 04/29/24 at 4:45 p.m., RN #1 was asked when enhanced barrier precautions were used according to facility policy. They stated when providing direct care to residents with catheters, drains, PEG tubes, or IV's and when providing wound care. RN #1 was informed of the observations made during dressing changes for Resident #4 and #8. They acknowledged they had not followed facility policy for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-04 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staff to meet the resident needs for five(#18, 23, 64, 86, and #161) of five residents reviewed for sufficient staffing. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report documented 111 residents resided at the facility. Findings: Resident #18 admitted with diagnoses which included major depression. Review of the shower task for Resident #18 revealed four showers that were documented as not applicable. Resident #18 was scheduled for showers on Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday evening. On 03/28/23 at 3:33 p.m., Resident #23 stated they wait long enough for their call light to be answered, they go out to the hall or nurses station to get someone. On 03/28/23 at 4:16 p.m., Resident #86 stated they feel like the facility needed more staff. On 03/29/23 at 10:31 a.m., Resident #64 stated call lights take a bit because the facility is short staffed. Resident #64 stated they take water pills and if they feel it is taking too long they call the nurses desk on the phone and they come. Resident #64…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-04-04 · tag F0847 — patternInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure: a. arbitration agreements contained clear language to indicate the resident or their representative were not required to sign the agreement as a condition of admission; and b. failed to ensure the arbitration agreement granted the resident or their representative the right to revoke the agreement within 30 calendar days of signing for three (#84, #98, and #106) of three residents reviewed for arbitration agreements. The administrator identified 34 residents who resided at the facility had entered into binding arbitration agreements since 09/16/19. Findings: A copy of the facility's, Voluntary Arbitration Agreement, provided by the administrator, read in parts, .Please know you can choose care at another facility if you do not wish to sign .This Voluntary Agreement to Arbitrate may be revoked within 30 days after being signed. Otherwise, this Agreement will be given full force and effect .This Agreement may be revoked by written notice delivered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-04-04 · tag F0848 — patternProvide a neutral and fair arbitration process and agree to arbitrator and venue.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure arbitration agreements provided for the selection of a neutral arbitrator agreed upon by both parties and for the selection of a venue that is convenient to both parties for three (#84, #98, and #106) of three residents who were reviewed for arbitration agreements. The administrator identified 34 residents who resided at the facility had entered into binding arbitration agreements since 09/16/19. Findings: A copy of the Voluntary Arbitration Agreement, provided by the administrator, read in parts, .Place of Arbitration: The seat or place of arbitration shall be the State and Country where Facility that provided care to the Resident is located . 1. Resident #84 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the clinical record revealed a Voluntary Arbitration Agreement had been signed by the resident's representative on 02/17/23. The signature page of the agreement had been scanned into the electronic clinical record with the admission packet.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-04-04 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide education and offer pneumonia vaccinations for four (#23, #33, #50, and #66) of five residents reviewed for pneumonia vaccinations. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report identified 111 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: The undated Pneumococcal Vaccine policy, read in parts, .It is our policy to offer our residents .immunization against pneumococcal disease .The resident's medical record shall include documentation .The resident or resident's representative was provided education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of pneumococcal immunization .The resident received the pneumococcal immunization or did not receive due to medical contraindication or refusal . 1. Resident #23 had diagnoses which included diabetes mellitus. The quarterly assessment, dated 03/20/23, documented the resident's pneumonia vaccination was not up to date. Review of the Immunization Report did not reveal documentation the pneumonia vaccination had been provided. Review of the clinical record did…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-04-04 · tag F0887 — patternEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure education was provided and declinations were documented for the COVID vaccine for three (#42, #56, and #87) of five residents reviewed for COVID vaccinations. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report identified 111 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Resident #42 had diagnoses which included hypertension. Review of the Immunization Report revealed the resident had refused the COVID vaccination. No date of refusal was provided. Review of the clinical record did not reveal education had been provided regarding the vaccine or a signed declination. 2. Resident #56 had diagnoses which included hypertension. Review of the Immunization Report revealed the resident had refused the COVID vaccination. No date of refusal was provided. Review of the clinical record did not reveal education had been provided regarding the vaccine or a signed declination. 3. Resident #87 had diagnoses which included diabetes mellitus. Review of the Immunization Report revealed the resident had refused the COVID…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-04-04 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure a significant change assessment was completed timely for one (#94) of one residents reviewed for hospice and end of life. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report identified 16 residents who were on hospice services. Findings: Resident #94 admitted with diagnoses which included Huntington's Disease. A Physician's Order, dated 01/24/23, documented Emerald hospice to eval and treat. The Emerald Hospice plan of care documented Resident #94 was admitted to hospice care and services for a diagnosis of Huntington's Disease. A significant change assessment, dated 03/21/23, documented Resident #94 elected the hospice benefit. A significant change assessment was due 14 days after Resident #94 was admitted to hospice care on 01/24/23. On 04/03/23 at 3:54 p.m., the MDS coordinator was asked if the significant change assessment was completed timely when Resident #94 elected the hospice benefit. They stated no.
- Potential for harm · D2023-04-04 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure pre and post dialysis assessments were completed and documented for one (#11) of one residents who were reviewed for dialysis. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report identified five residents who received dialysis. Findings: The undated Dialysis Care policy, read in parts, .All residents receiving dialysis will be assessed before and after dialysis treatment and for compliance with their individualized plan of care .All residents receiving dialysis treatment will have their access site assessed every shift. Assessment includes the following: Check bruit and thrill [the sound and feel of blood flowing through the dialysis port] . Resident #11 had diagnoses which included end stage renal disease. The annual assessment, dated 03/07/23, documented the resident received dialysis. The Care Plan, revised 03/16/23, documented the resident received dialysis three days a week, to evaluate the resident pre and post dialysis, to fill out pre and post dialysis evaluations, and observe for bruit at dialysis port.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-04-04 · tag F0732 — isolatedPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure nurse staffing was posted for residents and visitors to see. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report documented 111 residents resided at the facility. Findings: On 03/28/23 at 1:30 p.m., nurse staffing was observed to not be posted. The LPN at the desk was asked where the schedule for staffing was located. They provided a book that was kept behind the counter of the nursing station. The schedule book did not provide the census every day. Several days had staff names marked through and changes to staffing were unclear. On 04/04/23 at 10:00 a.m., The DON was asked where the nurse staffing was posted for residents and visitors to see. They stated the only thing they had was the staffing book. The DON was asked if it were always available to residents and visitors. They stated no, sometimes it is in the office.
- Potential for harm · D2023-04-04 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observations, and interview the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5%. Two medication errors were made out of 25 opportunites observed. This created a medication error of 8%. The administrator identified 109 residents received medications. Findings: Resident #94 admitted with diagnoses which included Huntington's Disease. A Physician's Order, dated 06/22/22 to start 06/23/22, documented to administer one tablet of clonazepam (a benzodiazepine for anxiety) 1 mg by mouth three times a day. A Physician's Order, dated 01/27/23 to start 01/28/23, documented to administer one tablet of metoclopramid (an anti-nausea medication) 5 mg by mouth before meals and at the hour of sleep. On 04/03/23 at 4:36 p.m., CMA #2 prepared clonazepam and metoclopramid for Resident #94. CMA #2 popped the medications into a medication cup and proceeded to knock on Resident #94's door. CMA #2 stated the resident must be in the dining room and went to the dining room where they identified Resident #94. CMA #2 attempted to administer the medications. Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-04-04 · tag F0776 — isolatedProvide timely, approved x-ray services, or have an agreement with an approved provider to obtain them.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure follow-up procedures/tests were completed as ordered for one (#23) of three residents who were reviewed for falls. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents reprot identified 111 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #23 had diagnoses which included muscle weakness. A nurse's note, dated 01/27/23, documented the resident had hit their head when they had fallen and was sent to the hospital for evaluation. A nurse's note, dated 01/30/23, documented the resident returned from the hospital. A physician progress note, dated 01/31/23, documented the resident had a small left basal ganglia hemorrhage. A nurse's note, dated 02/01/23, documented the resident had an appointment for a CT which was rescheduled to 02/13/23 at 1:30 p.m. due to road conditions. The Order Summary Report, documented an order, dated 02/08/23, for a repeat CT of the head to be completed on 02/13/23. A physician progress note, dated 03/07/23, read in part, .still needs repeat head CT . Review of the clinical record did not reveal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to EMERALD HEALTHCARE — 14 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 1.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 1.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 1.8 | +1.2 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 2.0 | ≈ chain avg |
The other 13 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.3★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EHC CLAREMORE OPERATIONS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 06/04/2018 |
| DAVID CM FISTEL LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 25% | since 03/17/2017 |
| JW OKLAHOMA HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 18% | since 06/04/2018 |
| YCOK HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 19% | since 06/04/2018 |
| DONNELLY, ANDREW | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/18/2018 |
| FLEISCHMANN, DAVID | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/17/2022 |
| GOPIN, BRIAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/15/2019 |
| WHITLOCK, LISA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 02/06/2025 |
| LIMESTONE FISCAL SERVICES LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/17/2017 |
| LME FAMILY HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/01/2018 |
| VNB NEW YORK LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/13/2023 |
| CHAFETZ, YISROEL | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/17/2017 |
| MINER, LAQUETA | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/19/2022 |
| PIERCE, JANIE | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2025 |
| SMITH, MELISSA | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/17/2017 |
| VANBRUNT, AMY | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/11/2024 |
| WALDEN, JACOB | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/17/2017 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 80% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 20% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OK
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Oklahoma Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 375499. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.