Ayden Healthcare Of Belle Springs.

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

60.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 78 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 44.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 52 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 39% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 81.1 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.30 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.66 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.59 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.03 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.42 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.75 to 0.46 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2019-10-24 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interviews, observation, review of a facility policy, and review of information from the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP), the facility failed to ensure monitoring of a pressure ulcer was completed to ensure appropriate care and treatment was provided to prevent deterioration of a pressure ulcer. This resulted in actual harm when Resident #39's pressure ulcer was not monitored on a weekly basis and resulted in the pressure ulcer to the coccyx developing to an unstageable deep tissue injury. Consequently, Resident #39's pressure ulcer to the coccyx required wound physician intervention including debridement of the area to remove necrotic tissue and the wound was assessed as a stage IV post debridement. This affected one (#39) of one resident reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility identified two residents currently residing in the facility with pressure ulcers. The facility census was 60. Findings include: Review of Resident #39's medical record revealed an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the self-reported incident (SRI) investigation, review of the employee time sheets, staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure further potential abuse was prevented by removing an employee suspected of sexual abuse pending the outcome of the abuse investigation. The affected one resident (#57) of three reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 80. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #57 revealed an admission date of 10/13/25. Diagnoses included respiratory failure, dysphagia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, muscle weakness and heart failure. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 indicating intact cognition and required substantial maximum assistance for toileting. The assessment stated the resident was continent of urine but always incontinent of bowel. Review of SRI #270483 dated 02/03/26 at 10:42 A.M. revealed Resident #57 reported CNA #64…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide a home-like environment in regards to facility's shower rooms being in good repair. This affected two residents (#1 and #4) with the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The current census is 87. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #1 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #1 include infective bursitis right elbow, diabetes type two, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition and was an extensive assist with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Review of Resident #1's care plans dated 05/2024 revealed a focus for ADL assistance. Interventions include mechanical lift for transfers, and staff assist with bathing. Interview on 06/23/25 at 12:55 P.M. with Resident #1 revealed the resident stated his main complaint with his care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-03-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, review of cleaning schedules, staff interviews, and policy reviews, the facility failed to ensure food products were dated when opened, kitchen sanitation was being maintained, and the proper sanitizer test strips were used with the dish machine. This had the potential to affect all 77 residents who received food from the kitchen. The facility census was 77. Findings include: 1. Observation on 03/10/25 at 8:00 A.M., of the kitchen revealed one bag of breadsticks open and undated in the walk-in freezer, one bag of shredded lettuce open and undated, one container of what appears to be crushed pineapple not labeled or dated, one bag of pepperoni open not dated, and two stacks of sliced cheese wrapped in saran wrap not dated observed in the walk-in refrigerator. Interview on 03/10/25 8:15 A.M., with Dietary Supervisor (DS) #122 verified the open bag of breadsticks in the walk-in freezer was not dated. Also verified the undated and labeled items in the walk-in refrigerator. Observation on 03/12/25 at 11:53 A.M., in the walk in cooler revealed three bottles of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of medical records, staff interview, observation, and review of policies, the facility failed to ensure staff follow enhance barrier precautions (EBP). This affected one (#31) of four residents reviewed for transmission based precautions. The facility failed to ensure clean laundry was not exposed to dirty surfaces and items. This had the potential to affect all residents of the facility. The facility also failed to prepare medications in a sanitary manner. This affected one (#22) of six residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 77. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #31's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/04/22. Diagnoses listed included cerebral infarction, hypertensive heart disease, aphasia, dysphagia, hyperlipidemia, hemiplegia, and hemiparesis. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #31 had severe cognitive impairment and an indwelling urinary catheter. Review of a care plan revealed Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-03-13 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
  Keep all essential equipment working safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain the kitchen microwave in a safe operating condition. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 77 residents who received meals from the kitchen. The facility census was 77. Findings include: Observation on 03/12/25 at 11:41 A.M., revealed the interior ceiling of the microwave had a large black/rusty color in the middle. Interview on 03/12/25 at 11:42 A.M., with Dietary Supervisor #122 revealed the microwave is used to warm up food such as waffles and pancakes. Dietary Supervisor #122 confirmed there is rust in the microwave. Review of the policy titled, Equipment Safety,dated 2021, stated Safety precautions will be followed when using electrical equipment. The policy also stated All equipment should be cleaned properly, following the instructions in the equipment manual. Review of the policy titled, Resident Environmental Quality, dated August 2023, stated The facility shall maintain all essential mechanical, electrical, and patient care equipment in safe operating condition. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, review of medication package insert, review of manufacturer recommendations, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications and solutions were dated when opened and stored under recommended conditions. This had the potential to affect all new admissions and residents who have their blood sugars checked using the glucometer. The facility identified 10 (#5, #6, #7, #19, #21, #29, #36, #55, #60, and #73) residents who had their blood sugars checked using the glucometer. The facility census was 77. Findings include: Observation on 03/10/25 at 8:30 A.M., of the medication cart on 200 hallway revealed one bottle of Aplisol injection (tuberculin solution) 5/0.1 milliliter (ml) not refrigerated or dated when opened. Also observed a box of assure prism control solution 4 milliliters (ml) times two vials (control solution for glucometer) open and not dated. Interview on 03/10/25 at 8:31 A.M., with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #147 revealed the nurse verified the Aplisol was not refrigerated or dated. LPN #147 verified the Aplisol should…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-13 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure pureed food was an appropriate smooth texture prior to serving residents on a pureed diet. The deficient practice had the potential to affect 10 (#6, #15, #32, #34, #41, #51, #53, #54, #63, and #184) of 10 residents on a prescribed pureed diet. The facility census was 77. Findings include: Interview on 03/12/25 at 10:34 A.M., with [NAME] #109 revealed the menu for lunch was pot roast, mashed potatoes, and Normandy vegetables. [NAME] #109 revealed she would be doing the purees. [NAME] #109 stated she is looking for a baby food consistency with her purees. [NAME] #109 stated a resident doesn't have to chew a puree. [NAME] #109 stated a puree food is completed when there are no chunks and no pieces of food. [NAME] #109 revealed she does not taste the purees. [NAME] #109 confirmed they have ten residents who required a puree lunch. Observation on 03/12/25 at 10:38 A.M., revealed [NAME] #109 started making the pot roast puree. On 03/12/25 at 10:41 A.M., [NAME] #109 stated the pot roast puree was done…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record review, family interview, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's room was maintain in good repair. This affected for one (#22) of two residents reviewed for physical environment. The facility census was 77. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #22 revealed an admission date of 01/31/22. The resident was admitted with diagnoses of hemiplegia and hemiparesis following unspecified cerebrovascular disease affecting right dominant side, cerebral infarction due to unspecified occlusion or stenosis of unspecified cerebral artery, and epilepsy. Review of quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #22 had severe cognitive impairment. Resident #22 required setup or clean up assistance for eating. Supervision or touching assistance was required for oral hygiene. Substantial/maximal assistance was required for toilet hygiene, shower/bathe self, upper body dressing, lower body dressing, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure care planned fall interventions were implemented. This affected one (#4) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 77. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #4 revealed an admission date of 10/17/20, with diagnoses including morbid obesity with alveolar hypoventilation, type two diabetes, chronic kidney disease stage four, atrial fibrillation, sleep apnea, bipolar disorder, unsteadiness on feet, major depressive disorder, and anxiety. Review of Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Resident #4 required supervision or touching assistance for oral hygiene, toileting, and bathing. Partial/moderate assistance for upper and lower body dressing and personal hygiene. Supervision or touching assistance for bed mobility and transfers. Review of care plan dated 02/17/25 revealed Resident #4 was at risk for accidental falls.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to implement the policy on ensure oxygen tubing was changed weekly. This affected one (#36) of three residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility census was 77. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #36 revealed an admission date of 02/04/24, with diagnoses including chronic atrial fibrillation, ischemic cardiomyopathy, type 2 diabetes, anxiety, vascular dementia, repeated falls, insomnia, pressure ulcer of left heel stage 4, acquired absence of right leg above knee, obstructive and reflux uropathy, fall on same level, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia. Review of Annual Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #36 had severe cognitive impairment. Resident #36 received oxygen therapy. Review of current physician orders for Resident #36 revealed oxygen via nasal cannula at a rate of 2 liters as needed for saturations below 90%. Review of care plan dated 02/19/25 for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AYDEN HEALTHCARE — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH