Ayden Healthcare Of Madeira
5970 Kenwood Road, Cincinnati, OH 45243 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 115 certified beds · (513) 561-4111 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565, F0568)
- a high number of inspection citations overall (80) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (65%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 1.0% | 5.3% | 15.4% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 9.2% | 6.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.4% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 56.2% | 30.1% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.2% | 3.2% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 2.3% | 6.1% | 16.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 19.5% | 25.5% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 89.1% | 94.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.1% | 3.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 20.7% | 21.4% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 11.9% | 8.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 65.7% | 75.6% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 29.9% | 24.9% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 24.3% | 12.9% | 12.0% | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 34% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 9.5% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.06 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 115 beds and averages 89.0 residents a day — about 77% occupied, or roughly 26 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.07 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.38 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.80 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.83 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.17 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.42 to 0.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 65% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
80 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 70 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-16 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespreadEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure menus were preplanned and followed for daily meals and emergency meals. This affected all 86 residents who the facility identified as receiving meals from the kitchen. The facility census was 86.Findings Include:1) Observations on 12/08/25 at 9:09 A.M. (breakfast meal), on 12/10/25 at 7:38 A.M. (breakfast meal), and 12/11/25 at 1:05 P.M. (lunch meal), revealed there were no meal spreadsheets used during the tray line meal service for residents on therapeutic diets.Review of the diets ordered listing provided by the facility on 12/10/25 at 7:38 A.M., revealed there were six residents on controlled carbohydrate diet restrictions, three residents on low sodium diet restrictions, and two residents on renal diet restrictions,Interview on 12/10/25 at 7:39 A.M., [NAME] # 103 verified there was no spreadsheet of planned meals for the concentrated controlled, low sodium and renal diets. [NAME] #103 stated he did not know the specific food items to avoid or the portions to serve for the physician ordered therapeutic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prepare and store food in a manner to prevent foodborne illness. This affected all 86 residents who the facility identified as receiving food from the kitchen. The total facility census was 86. Findings Include:Observation of the kitchen during the initial tour on 12/08/25 at 9:09 A.M. with Dietary Manager (DM) #04, revealed the following:1) At the dietary employee handwashing sink there was no soap in the dispenser, and the hand drying towels were not in a hands-free dispenser. 2) Inside the walk-in refrigerator there was an undated open container with orange liquid labeled water. There was a packaged coleslaw with an expired label of best used by 10/02/25, and an expired opened container of boiled eggs dated 12/01/25. There was an uncut watermelon which was blacked throughout the exterior. 3) There were opened thawing pie shells with no open date and dated an arrival of 11/11/25. There were undated thawing items, including three bags of pork loin, a bag of chicken pieces, and two packages of hamburger.4)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-12-16 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespreadDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the garbage cans were covered when not in use. This affected all 86 residents receiving food from the kitchen. The total facility census was 86.Findings Include:Observation of the kitchen during the initial tour on 12/08/25 at 9:09 A.M. with Dietary Manager (DM) #04 revealed there were four garbage cans in the dish machine area and in the food preparation area of the kitchen which were not covered. The containers were nearly full of food and garbage, and the kitchen staff were not actively using the garbage containers. Interview at the same time with DM #04, verified the cans were nearly full, were not in active use and should be covered. Observation of the kitchen on 12/15/25 at 10:30 A.M., with DM #04 revealed there were four garbage cans in the dish machine area and in the food preparation area of the kitchen which were not covered. The containers contained food and garbage and the staff were not actively using the garbage containers. Interview at the same time with DM #04, verified the cans should be covered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a clean, comfortable and homelike environment for residents. This affected six residents (#04, #11, #15, #19, #39, and #86) out of 15 residents reviewed for physical environment. The facility census was 86.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record of Resident #19 revealed an admission date of 10/10/24. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, urinary tract infection, and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed this resident had intact cognition evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15. This resident was assessed to require setup or cleanup assistance for eating, setup or cleanup assistance for oral hygiene, substantial/maximal assistance for toileting, substantial/maximal assistance for shower/bathing, dependent for dressing, and substantial/maximal assistance for personal hygiene. Observation on 12/10/25 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to update care plans following a change in condition. This affected four Residents (#02, #10, #25, and #60) out of 24 residents reviewed for care planning. The facility also failed to ensure care conferences were completed. This affected six Residents (#04, #09, #10, #11, #13, and #39) out of 24 residents reviewed for care planning. The facility census was 86.Findings include: 1) Review of the medical record for Resident #02 revealed an admission date of 07/10/25. Diagnosis included traumatic brain injury, psychosis, Barrett's esophagus, and dysphagia. Review of the Incident Report dated from 10/09/24 through 12/09/25, revealed Resident #02 fell on the following dates: 06/23/25, 06/24/25, 07/05/25, 07/29/25, and three separate falls on 08/07/25. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed Resident #02 had severe cognitive deficits and required total dependence with care from staff for activities of daily…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of fall investigations, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision for residents who smoke. This affected three Residents (#12, #57, and #61) of three residents reviewed for smoking. The facility also failed to thoroughly investigate falls and implement appropriate fall interventions following falls to reduce and/or eliminate future falls. This affected five Residents (#01, #02, #25, #60, and #66) of five residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 86. Findings include:1) Review of Resident #12's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/30/21. Diagnosis included end stage renal disease, dependence on renal dialysis, anxiety disorder and tobacco use. Review of the care plan dated 09/15/25, revealed Resident #12 was at increased risk of injury related to smoking cigarettes. Interventions include providing supervision at all times while smoking, smoking assessment upon admission,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-16 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — patternEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure therapeutic diets were received, as ordered by the physician. This affected four Residents (#48, #51, #53 and #01) of four residents reviewed for therapeutic diets. The total facility census was 86.Findings Include:1) Record review of Resident #48 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #48 include cerebral infarction, malnutrition, and end stage renal disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) comprehensive assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #48 had intact cognition and required supervision with meals. The resident received dialysis treatments three times a week at a dialysis center. The resident received a renal diet, with double portions of protein at breakfast. Observation of Resident #48's breakfast tray and review of the meal ticket on 12/11/25 at 8:10 A.M., revealed an order for renal diet. Resident #48 received one portion of egg with cheese, eight ounces of milk and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: 6 Based on chart review, observation, interview, and policy review revealed the facility failed to ensure proper infection control practices. This affected four Residents (#11, #19, #88, and #86) reviewed for infection control in the initial pool. The facility also failed to ensure hand hygiene was performed during medication administration and incontinence care. This affected two Residents (#45 and #85) out of four residents observed for medication administration and one Resident #85 out of two Residents (#09 and #85) observed for incontinence care. The in-house facility census was 86.Findings include: 1) A chart review revealed Resident #19 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including urinary tract infection, generalized anxiety, anemia, colostomy status, and bipolar disorder. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated for 10/14/25 revealed Resident #19 had no cognitive deficits and required substantial to moderate assistance with activities…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-16 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to provide/offer the pneumococcal vaccine to all residents. This affected five Residents (#19, #02, #04, #88, and #90) of the five residents reviewed for pneumococcal vaccines. The facility further failed to provide/offer the influenza vaccine to all residents. This affected three Residents (#19, #04, and #90) of the five residents reviewed for influenza vaccines. The facility further failed to provide/offer the Coronavirus (COVID) vaccine to all residents. This affected four Residents (#02, #19, #04, and #88) of the five residents reviewed for COVID vaccines. The facility census was 86.Findings includeReview of the medical record of Resident #19 revealed an admission date of 10/10/24. Diagnosis included chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder, respiratory failure, asthma, colostomy status, anxiety, and anemia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #19 was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #19's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-16 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain a safe, functional, and sanitary environment. This directly affected two Residents (#56 and #59) and had the potential to affect 11 additional residents housed in the 500 hall out of 13 residents reviewed for environment. The facility census was 86.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #56 revealed an admission date of 07/03/24. Diagnoses included unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, with other behavioral disturbance, unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition, encephalopathy, acute kidney failure, type two diabetes mellitus without complications, and hyperlipidemia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #56 had severely impaired cognition. Resident #56 was assessed to require supervision for eating and bed mobility, partial/moderate assistance for oral hygiene and toileting, and substantial/maximal assistance for bathing, dressing, and personal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 70 citations
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-16 · tag F0924 — patternPut firmly secured handrails on each side of hallways.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure handrails on the Memory Care Unit (MCU) were secured to the wall. This had the potential to affect all 20 Residents (#07, #22, #25, #27, #38, #41, #43, #44, #54, #56, #58, #59, #64, #69, #75, #77, #80, #82, #85, and #88) who the facility identified as being independently mobile and residing on the MCU. The facility census was 86.Findings include:Observation on 12/11/25 at 12:55 P.M. on the MCU, revealed the handrail between the nursing station and the hallway leading to the outdoor smoking area was not secured to the wall. The handrail on the right side of the hallway leading to the outdoor smoking area was also not properly secured to the wall.Interview on 12/11/25 at 12:59 P.M. with State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #60 verified the handrails were not secured to the wall.Review of the facility policy titled Resident Environmental Quality, dated 08/2022, revealed the facility should equip corridors with firmly secured handrails.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-16 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodations to allow residents appropriate access to handwashing facilities. This affected three resident (Residents #13, #15 and #55) of five residents reviewed. The total facility census was 86. Findings Include:1. Record review for Resident #13 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: Morbid obesity, Acute and Chronic Respiratory Failure with hypoxia, and Ventral Hernia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15. This resident was assessed to require setup or clean-up assistance for personal hygiene. The resident could transfer self and ambulate a few feet independently. The resident used a bariatric wheelchair for mobility.Review of the weight log revealed the Resident #13 weighed 496 pounds on 11/18/25.Interview on 12/09/25 at 8:45 A.M.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-16 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure a discharge summary was completed. This affected one resident (Resident #94) out of three residents reviewed for discharged summaries. The facility census was 86. Findings Include:Record review for Resident #94 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: Unspecified combined systolic (congestive) and diastolic (congestive) heart failure, and venous insufficiency (chronic) (peripheral). Resident #94 had a planned discharge home on [DATE].Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition. The resident was assessed to require setup or clean-up assistance for eating, setup or clean-up assistance for oral hygiene, setup or clean-up assistance for toileting, setup or clean-up assistance for shower/bathing, setup or clean-up assistance for dressing, and setup or clean-up assistance for personal hygiene. It noted the resident was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a fall care plan for a resident who was at risk for falls. This affected one (Resident #66) of five residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 86. Findings include:Review of the medical record of Resident #66 revealed an admission date of 10/09/24. Diagnoses included right hip fracture, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypothyroidism, unsteadiness on feet, depression, cognitive communication deficit, and restless legs syndrome.Review of the Fall Risk Evaluation dated 12/10/24 revealed the resident was at risk for falls.Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #66 had severely impaired cognition. The resident was dependent on staff for transfers, toileting and bathing Review of the progress note dated 01/14/25, revealed Resident #66 experienced an unwitnessed fall. The fall occurred in the resident's room when she was walking from her bathroom to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-16 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide varied activities to meet the needs and interests of residents. This affected three Residents (#15, #13 and #39) of five residents reviewed for activities. The total facility census was 86.Findings Include: Review of the activity calendars for October, November and December 2025 revealed from 9:30 A.M. to 11:30 A.M., there were three activities consisting of exercise, hydration cart, and table games for seven days of the week. Two to three times a week there was a 5:00 P.M. activity. There were no activities listed after 5:00 P.M. There was no religious program listing on Sundays or any other days of the week. Review of activity participation logs of 12/01/25 through 12/10/25 revealed 10 to 20 of the same residents attending all activities. There was no participation in the morning exercise class. There were no one-on-one participation logs provided for December 2025. Record review for Resident #13 revealed the resident was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided as planned and ordered. This affected one (Resident #15) out of three reviewed. The facility census was 86.Findings include: Record review for Resident #15 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included lymphedema, gastro-esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis, and hyperlipemia. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #15 had intact cognition evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15. Review of active physician orders revealed Resident #15 was ordered to have lymphedema boots placed on the resident by nursing staff for one hour two times a day for swelling reduction. Review of the October, November and December 2025 Medication Administration Record, (MAR), revealed there were two time slots for documentation for morning and nighttime. The slots did not have a time duration of one hour and there was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-16 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to arrange vision services outside of the facility as requested. This affected one (Resident #04) of one resident reviewed for vision services. The facility census was 86. Findings include:Review of the medical record of Resident #04 revealed an admission date of 07/23/20. Diagnoses included paraplegia, bipolar disorder, anxiety, depression, panic disorder, nicotine dependence, schizophrenia, opioid dependence, and cocaine abuse. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed the resident had intact cognition. The resident was independent with eating, required substantial/maximal assistance with bed mobility and was dependent with transfers, bathing, and dressing. Interview on 12/08/25 at 3:21 P.M., Resident #04 stated he was unable to see out of his left eye and was unable to get someone in the facility to make him an eye appointment. Review of an Eye Care Chart note dated 07/24/25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-16 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure weights were completed as ordered. This affected three (Residents #04, #10, and #48) of five residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 86.Findings include:1) Review of the medical record of Resident #04 revealed an admission date of 07/23/20. Diagnoses included paraplegia, bipolar disorder, anxiety, depression, panic disorder, nicotine dependence, schizophrenia, opioid dependence, and cocaine abuse. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #04 had intact cognition. Review of weights for Resident #04 revealed the following: On 03/05/25, the resident weighed 163.2 pounds, on 04/18/25, the resident weighed 161.2 pounds, on 05/08/25, the resident weighed 157.4 pounds, on 07/02/25, the resident weighed 144.6 pounds, on 08/06/25, the resident weighed 144.2 pounds, on 09/06/25, the resident weighed 145 pounds, on 10/06/25, the resident weighed 146 pounds, on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-16 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's gastrostomy tube (G-tube) was taken care of per physician orders. This affected one (Resident #11) out of two residents reviewed for G-tube care. The facility census was 86.Findings include:Review of the medical record of Resident #11 revealed an admission date of 04/15/21. Diagnoses included dysphagia, type 2 diabetes mellitus, dementia with behavioral disturbance, hypertension, and gastro-esophageal reflux disease.Review of physician orders dated 07/30/25 for Resident #11 revealed an order to change the resident's G-tube dressing daily at night shift and as needed (PRN). Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed the resident had moderately impaired cognition. The resident was dependent or required maximum assistance for activities of daily living (ADL). Review of the October and November 2025 treatment administration record (TAR) revealed Resident #11 did not have a G-tube dressing change…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen was provided appropriately. This affected one (Resident #44) out of one resident reviewed for oxygen. The facility census was 86.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #44 revealed an admission date of 06/01/21. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), anxiety disorder due to known physiological condition, unspecified dementia, unspecified severity with mood disturbance, other seizures, schizophrenia, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, and major depressive disorder.Review of the plan of care initiated on 08/30/25, revealed Resident #44 had altered respiratory status/difficulty breathing related to COPD. Interventions included administer medications/puffers as ordered, encourage resident to keep head of bed elevated to prevent shortness of breath with lying flat, and oxygen as needed per orders.Review of the quarterly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-16 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was not greater than five percent (%). This affected two (Residents #13 and #19) of the three residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 86. Findings included:1) Record review for Resident #13 revealed this resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Acute and Chronic Respiratory Failure with hypoxia, Ventral Hernia without obstruction or gangrene, and dependence on respirator (ventilator) status. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed this resident had intact cognition evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15. This resident was dependent on staff for medication administration. Review of active physician orders for Resident #13 revealed the resident was ordered cetirizine hydrochloride (allergies) 10 milligrams (mg) and spironolactone (potassium-sparing diuretic) 50 mg. Observation of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-16 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors. This affected one (Resident #90) out of the two residents reviewed for IV medication. The facility census was 86.Findings Include: Record review for Resident #90 revealed this resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: Osteomyelitis, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Foot Ulcer, and bipolar disorder. Review of the most Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed this resident had moderate intact cognition evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12. Review of the physician orders dated 10/17/25 for Resident #90 revealed the resident was ordered the resident to receive daptomycin (antibiotic used to treat serious infections caused by specific gram-positive bacteria, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) sodium chloride intravenous solution 1000 - 0.9 percent in 100 milliliters (mL)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-16 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure laboratory (lab) tests were completed as ordered. This affected one (Resident #81) of one resident reviewed for laboratory services. The facility census was 86. Findings include:Review of the medical record of Resident #81 revealed an admission date of 07/21/25. The resident discharged from the facility on 07/27/25 and did not return. Diagnoses included pyogenic arthritis, Methicillin Resistant Staph Aureus (MRSA) bacteremia, anxiety, anemia, and stimulant abuse. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #81 dated 07/27/25, revealed the resident had intact cognition. The resident rejected care and resident required setup/cleanup assistance or supervision with all activities of daily living. Review of the physician orders for Resident #81 dated 07/21/25, revealed an order for the resident to receive for vancomycin (an antibiotic used to treat serious bacterial infections) intravenous solution 1000 milligrams (mg)/200 milliliter (ml). Use 1000 mg intravenously every eight…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-16 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow up timely on dental recommendations. This affected one (Resident #39) of the five residents reviewed for dental care. The total facility census was 86Findings Include:Record review for Resident #39 revealed this resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] Diagnoses included Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Diabetic Neuropathy, Diabetes mellitus, and Unsteadiness of feet. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #39 had intact cognition evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15. This resident was assessed to require supervision or touching assistance for eating, and supervision or touching assistance for oral hygiene. The resident had a physician order for a regular diet. Review of nursing notes dated 08/19/25, revealed Resident #39 was scheduled for surgical dental appointment. The surgical procedure could not be done due to increase in blood pressure. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-16 · tag F0800 — isolatedProvide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents received three meals a day. This affected one (Resident #19) out of three residents reviewed for meal assistance. The facility census was 86.Findings Include:Observation on 12/10/25 at 2:10 P.M., revealed Resident #19 had not received their lunch at this time.Interview on 12/10/25 at 2:11 P.M., with Resident #19 confirmed they did not receive lunch at this time. Resident #19 stated that they requested a ham sandwich and a bowl of soup from the alternative menu.Interview on 12/10/25 at 2:27 with the Director of Nursing (DON), confirmed Resident #19 did not receive their lunch. Review of the facility policy titled, Mealtimes and Frequency revealed the facility will provide at least three meals daily at regular times. The policy also states lunch will be served daily at 12:30 P.M.This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number 1264367.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-16 · tag F0914 — isolatedProvide bedrooms that don't allow residents to see each other when privacy is needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure rooms provided full visual privacy for each resident. This affected two Residents (#56 and #59) out of two residents reviewed for privacy. The facility census was 86.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #56 revealed an admission date of 07/03/24. Diagnoses included unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, with other behavioral disturbance, unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition, encephalopathy, acute kidney failure, type two diabetes mellitus without complications, and hyperlipidemia.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #56 had severely impaired cognition. Resident #56 was assessed to require supervision for eating and bed mobility, partial/moderate assistance for oral hygiene and toileting, and substantial/maximal assistance for bathing, dressing, and personal hygiene.Review of the medical record for Resident #59 revealed an admission date of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure clean dishes were handled in a sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect all 87 residents in the facility who the facility identified all residents receiving food from the kitchen. The facility census was 87.Findings include:Observation of the kitchen on 07/09/25 at 11:01 A.M., revealed [NAME] #300 loading dirty dishes onto racks and pushing the dirty racks through the dish machine. [NAME] #300 pushed two racks through the dish machine, rinsed her hands with the dish sprayer, and walked over to the other side of the dish machine and began unloading clean dishes from the racks. [NAME] #300 was not observed to wash her hands or complete any hand hygiene when moving between the dirty dishes to the clean dishes. [NAME] #300 then finished unloading the clean dishes from two racks and walked back over to the dirty dishes and began loading more dirty dishes onto a rack. [NAME] #300 pushed another rack through the dish machine and, again, walked over to the other side of the dish machine to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to provide medications as ordered by physician. This affected one resident (Resident #11) of three residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 94 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #11 revealed an admission date of 07/10/24 with diagnoses including osteoarthritis and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #11 dated 10/15/24 revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs.) Review of physician's orders for Resident #11 revealed an order dated 07/15/24 for Adderall five milligrams (mg) two tablets twice daily. Review of controlled drug administration records for Resident #11 revealed Adderall was not administered on the following dates: 08/27/24 to 09/03/24, 09/07/24, 09/08/24, and 9/13/24 to 09/25/24. Review of Medication Administration Records (MAR) for Resident #11…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to accurately document medication administration. This affected one (Resident #11) of three residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 94 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #11 revealed an admission date of 07/10/24 with diagnoses including osteoarthritis and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #11 dated 10/15/24 revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs.) Review of physician's orders for Resident #11 revealed an order dated 07/15/24 for Adderall five milligrams (mg) two tablets twice daily. Review of controlled drug administration records for Resident #11 revealed Adderall was not administered on the following dates: 08/27/24 to 09/03/24, 09/07/24, 09/08/24, and 9/13/24 to 09/25/24. Review of Medication Administration Records (MAR) for Resident #11 dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility staff interviews and policy review the facility failed to develop a complete comprehensive care plan to include activities. This affected three (Resident #9, #13, and #45) out of four residents reviewed for activities. The facility census was 88. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #9 revealed an admission date of 07/10/23 with diagnoses of acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, major depressive disorder, and heart failure. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact, required set-up assistance with eating, and required supervision assistance with oral hygiene, toileting hygiene, bathing, dressing, personal hygiene, bed mobility, transfers, and ambulation. Review of the Activities Initial Review assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had interests / hobbies of arts and crafts. Unknown if resident wished to participate in activities while in the facility. Review of the current care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-16 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of the Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) report, record review and staff interview the facility failed to have eight consecutive hours of Registered Nurse (RN) coverage in the facility. This had the potential to affect all 92 residents who resided in the facility. Findings include: Review of the PBJ report for quarter one of the 2024 fiscal year, revealed the facility had a high number of days without RN coverage. Review of the staffing schedules from 01/01/24 to 03/31/24 revealed no RN was scheduled for eight consecutive hours on 02/03/24, 02/04/24, 02/10/24, 02/11/24, 02/17/24, 02/18/24, 03/30/24, and 03/31/24. Review of the daily staffing posting for 02/03/24, 02/04/24, 02/10/24, 02/11/24, 02/17/24, 02/18/24, 03/30/24 and 03/31/24 revealed no documented RN coverage for eight consecutive hours. Interview with the Administrator on 07/16/24 at 10:00 A.M. verified that there was no RN scheduled for eight consecutive hours on 02/03/24, 02/04/24, 02/10/24, 02/11/24, 02/17/24, 02/18/24, 03/30/24, and 03/31/24.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure perineal care was provided for a resident. This affected one (#38) of three reviewed for incontinent care. The facility census is 87. Findings include Medical record review for Resident #38 revealed an admission on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to congestive heart failure, asthma, hypotension, and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder. Review of the comprehension Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #38 revealed the resident had intact cognition. Resident #38 was not coded with refusals or rejections of care. Resident #38 required set up for meals, dependent for toileting, maximum assistance for transfers and moderate assistance for bed mobility. Resident #38 was coded as incontinent of bladder and bowel. Review of the plan of care for Resident #38 revealed resident required assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) due to hypertension, diabetes,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-24 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to have a Registered Nurse on duty for two days on the weekends. This affected all residents in the facility. The facility census was 87. Findings include: Review of the time punches and daily schedules the facility did not have a registered nurse on duty on Saturday 01/13/24 and Sunday 01/14/24. Interview with Resident #43 and Resident #66 on 01/18/24 at 10:00 A.M. revealed the facility is short staffed on the weekends. Interview with the Director of Nursing on 01/18/24 at 2:00 P.M. confirmed she did not have a registered nurse on duty for the weekend of 01/13/24 and 01/14/24.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-24 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespreadEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents had reasonable access to menus to meet resident needs, facility failed to have alternate menus, failed to ensure residents were notified of menu substitutions, and failed to prepare meals according to the menu. This directly affected seven (Residents #3, #6 #11, #62, #29, #33 and #56) residents and had the potential to affect all residents who received food from the kitchen. The facility census was 87. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/24/23, revealed Resident #3 was cognitively intact. During an interview on 01/16/24 at 3:02 P.M., Resident #6 had stated she had no menu, and the food served was a surprise. She and other residents had asked for menus to be printed, but she thought it would be senseless, because they tell you one thing was being served and something else was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-24 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespreadEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the food looked appetizing and was palatable. This affected all of the residents in the facility. The census was 87. Findings include: Observation of the lunch tray on 01/22/24 at 12:30 P.M. revealed it was spaghetti with meat sauce and cheese on the top, roll, and Normandy blend of vegetables. The vegetables looked brownish. The roll was sitting on the plate and the juices from the other foods made the roll soggy. Interview with the Dietary Manager #44 on 01/22/24 at 12:35 P.M. agreed the meal looked over cooked. She confirmed the roll was soggy from the juices on the plate.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure opened food items were dated, staff wore hair coverings and that food was stored properly in the freezer. This had the potential to affect all residents who received food from the kitchen. The facility census was 87. Findings include: 1. During an observation of the reach in freezer on 01/16/24 at 9:00 A.M., there was opened lettuce, hot dogs, turkey lunch meat, bologna, cheese, left over soup, left over enchiladas, and open tuna salad without dates. Nutritional Juice Drinks 6 ounces without dates (Four orange pineapple, six apple juice, 13 cranberry juice) were taken from their original boxes and placed into the refrigerator without a date on them. 2. During an observation on 01/16/24 at 9:10 A.M., there was a large box of beef on the floor of the freezer. 3. During an observation of the tray line on 01/16/24 at 11:30 A.M, [NAME] #66, and Dietary Aides #26 and #30 were not wearing a covering ot wearing hair on 01/16/24 at 11:30 A.M. during tray line, without covering their facial hair. During an interview on 01/16/24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-01-24 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespreadHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement a quality assurance performance improvement (QAPI) plan. This had the potential to affect all 87 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: During the entrance conference on 01/17/24 at 10:04 A.M., the facility's QAPI plan was requested to be provided. During the course of the survey, the QAPI plan was not received. During an interview on 01/22/24 at 3:01 P.M., the Administrator stated he had been working in the facility since January of 2023 and he didn't have a QAPI plan. He stated he goes over the areas of concerns in the morning meetings with the staff and had nothing documented. Review of the policy titled Quality Assurance Performance Improvement Program, dated 10/01/18, revealed this facility shall develop, implement, and maintain an ongoing, facility-wide QAPI program that builds on the Quality Assessment and Assurance Program to actively pursue quality of care and quality of life goals.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-24 · tag F0868 — widespreadHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide evidence a quarterly quality assessment and assurance (QAA) meeting was held. This had the potential to affect all 87 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Evidence of the facility's quarterly QAA meetings for the last 12 months were requested. Nothing was provided by the end of the survey. During interview on 01/22/24 a 3:01 P.M., the Administrator said he could provide no evidence QAA meetings were held.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-24 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to address concerns brought forth by the Resident Council in a timely manner. This directly affected 15 residents who attended the resident council meetings and had the potential to affect all residents. The census was 87. Findings include: Review of resident council meeting minutes dated 01/26/23 documented the residents were concerned about the availability of a substitute menu. When they call down to the kitchen they are told the items aren't available and that additional portions had been thrown away. The minutes dated 03/23/23 documented the residents stated they would like a weekly menu. The minutes dated 04/20/23 documented he residents complained they weren't seeing their concerns reviewed in a timely manner and not seeing resolutions to the concerns. The residents were not pleased with the quality of food presentation and not knowing what the daily meals are going to be. The residents complained of the taste of the food and receiving unwanted items and don't think the diet orders are being followed.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the environment and resident equipment were in good repair. This affected four (Residents#5, #27, #29, and #33) of five reviewed for environment. The census was 87. Findings include: 1. During an observation on 01/16/24 at 11:29 A.M., Resident #5's room had splashes of a yellowish substance on the right side of the toilet. Two light globes at the top of the mirror in the bathroom had thick dust on them and the bulb was burnt out in the left light. There were multiple holes in the wall behind the sink in the bathroom. The privacy curtain in the room was soiled with a black and yellow substance. 2. During an observation on 01/17/24 at 7:46 A.M., Resident #27's window blinds were not in place properly and were missing slats. 3. During an observation on 01/16/24 at 1:44 P.M., Resident #29's bedroom floor had stains. The lights in the bathroom were covered with dust. The tile next to the right side of the toilet was coming up from the floor. The wallpaper was coming off the wall going into the bathroom, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents had complete and accurate care plans and failed to ensure that care plans were implemented. This affected six (Residents #22, #29, #33, #76, #336, and #82) of twenty-four residents sampled for care plans. The facility census was 87. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including unspecified cerebral infarction with hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting the left dominant side, paranoid schizophrenia, type II diabetes, unspecified chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type II diabetes, and schizoaffective disorder. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/03/23, revealed Resident #22 was cognitively intact, had no behaviors, did not wander, and did not reject care. Resident #22 had impairment on one side which caused functional limitation in range of motion. Review of the care plan dated 01/16/24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents smoked in designated areas and failed to ensure smoking materials were kept secured. This affected four (Residents #45, #33, #336 and #76) of five residents reviewed for smoking. The facility identified 62 residents who smoked. The facility census was 87. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #45 revealed an admission date of 01/08/18. Medical diagnoses included traumatic brain dysfunction. There was not a current smoking assessment. The last smoking assessment in Resident #45's record was dated 04/12/21. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/01/23, revealed Resident #45 was severely cognitively impaired. Review of the care plan for Resident #45 dated 12/01/23 revealed the resident was at risk for injury related to smoking. Intervention was to provide supervision at all times for smoking. Smoking items are to be kept at the nursing station. Review of the progress notes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-24 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff were not assigned to residents who specified they did not want that caregiver and failed to ensure residents received their phone calls. This affected two (Residents #26 and #336) of two residents reviewed for resident rights. The census was 87. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #26 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis and heart failure. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #26 was cognitively intact. Review of a facility Self-Reported Incident (SRI), #242077 dated 12/12/23, documented the facility received an anonymous letter from a church in the community alleging possible abuse or neglect of Resident #26. When staff spoke with Resident #26 she said there were two staff members she didn't want to care for her because of personal reasons. During an interview on 01/17/24 at 2:31 P.M., Resident #26 stated she did…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-24 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete a new Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) when a new mental health diagnosis was given. This affected two (Residents #33 and #45) of six reviewed for PASRR. The facility census was 87. Findings include: 1. Review of the record for Resident #33 revealed he was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses including schizophrenia (08/08/22), bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, and panic disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #33 was cognitively intact. Review of the medical record revealed a PASRR was completed on 07/20/20. However, a new PASRR was not completed for Resident #33 after the diagnosis of schizophrenia was added 08/08/22. 2. Review of the record for Resident #45 revealed he was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia with psychotic disturbance, delusional disorder (10/28/21), major depression and anxiety disorder. Review of the MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #45 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-24 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents received quarterly care conferences. This affected two (Residents #6 and #62) of three residents sampled for care conferences. The facility census was 87. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident # 6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including unspecified cerebral palsy, COPD, type II diabetes, (03/14/13) unspecified bipolar disorder, unspecified hallucinations, contracture to unspecified joint. unspecified major depressive disorder, and other chronic pain. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident # 6 was cognitively intact, had no behaviors, did not wander, and did not reject care. Record review revealed there were only two care conferences held in 2023 for Resident #6 on 04/25/23 and 07/28/23. 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident # 62 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure showers were given. This affected two (Residents #29 and #33) of two reviewed for activities of daily living. The census was 87. Findings included: 1. Record review for Resident #29 revealed an admission date of 03/24/23. His medical diagnoses included cerebrovascular accident, diabetes, hypertension, and heart failure. Review of progress notes dated 09/01/23 through 01/18/24 revealed no refusals for showers. Review of quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #29 was cognitively intact. There was no care plan for bathing or showers in his record. Review of the documentation for Resident #29 revealed since 11/14/23 revealed Resident #29 had received six showers out of 20 opportunities. During an interview on 01/16/24 at 1:44 P.M., Resident #29 stated he gets showers but he goes a little longer than he would like to in between showers. He stated there wasn't enough aides on nights to give him a shower and he has voiced it to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-24 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a pressure ulcer was monitored when hospice took over the care of the resident. This affected one (Resident #27) of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility identified three residents with pressure ulcers in the facility. The census was 87. Findings include: Record review for Resident #27 revealed an admission date of 02/22/23. His medical diagnoses included traumatic brain disorder, cerebrovascular accident (CVA), non-Alzheimer's dementia, malnutrition, and schizophrenia. Review of the initial pressure ulcer assessment dated [DATE] documented a pressure injury wound to the right trochanter measured seven centimeters (cm) by 6.5 cm by two cm with 100 percent granulation tissue. There was moderate exudate and and the peri-wound was normal and the wound had no signs of infection. Review of the inial pressure ulcer assessment dated [DATE] documented a pressure injury to the coccyx that measured 2.7 cm by 1.5 cm by one cm with 100…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-24 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review and policy review, the facility failed to provide incontinence care in a manner to prevent urinary tract infection. This affected one (Resident #11) resident reviewed for incontinence. The facility identified 45 residents who were incontinent. The facility census was 87. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #11 revealed an admission date of 02/12/19. Diagnoses included diabetes mellitus type II, spondylosis, post menopausal bleeding, hypertension, anxiety disorder, morbid obesity due to excess calories. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #11, dated 10/27/23, revealed the resident had intact cognition. The resident required the assistance of two persons for activities of daily living and was totally dependent for transfers. The resident had no pressure ulcers. During an interview on 01/22/24 at 10:30 A.M., Resident #11 stated she had a urinary tract infection about a month ago. During an observation of incontinence care for Resident #11 on 01/22/24 at 10:30 A.M., State Tested Nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received medications as ordered. This affected three (Residents # 18, #45, and #29) of six residents sampled for medication administration. The facility census was 87. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including unspecified anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, unspecified ankle contracture, unspecified pain, and hereditary spastic paraplegia. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/02/23, revealed Resident #18 was cognitively intact, had no behaviors, did not wander, and did not reject care. Resident #18 had an indwelling urinary catheter. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #18 had physician orders for medications including cranberry capsule 425 milligrams (mg) by mouth once daily; ferrous sulfate 300 mg/5 milliliters (ml), give 5 ml by mouth once daily; loratadine 10 mg by mouth…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were not left at the bedside. This affected one (Resident #43) out of 21 residents the nurse administered medications to. The facility census was 87. Findings include: Review of Resident #43's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus type II, morbid obesity, peripheral vascular disease, chronic atrial fibrillation, and acute respiratory failure. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/20/23, revealed Resident #43 was cognitively intact. During an observation on 01/16/24 at 10:30 A.M., there was a cup of medications at Resident #43's bedside. During an interview at the time of the observation, Resident #43 stated he has trouble taking all of the medication at once. He asked the nurse to leave the medication and he would take it later. During an interview on 01/16/24 at 10:45 A.M., Nurse #77…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-24 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure dental services were provided to residents. This affected two (Residents #33 and #73) four residents reviewed for dental services. The facility census was 87. Findings include: 1. Medical record review for Resident #33 revealed an admission date of 07/23/20. Diagnoses included traumatic spinal cord dysfunction. Review of a visit for the dentist on 08/24/23 revealed the resident was seen in his room. The recommendation was to bring the resident to the clinic. There was moderate plaque, calculus, and gingivitis. Recommended staff assistance with daily oral care, brushing two times a day to decrease bacterial load. Review of quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/14/23, revealed Resident #33 was cognitively intact. During an interview on 01/16/24 at 2:08 P.M., Resident #33 stated he was supposed to visit the dentist office and it hasn't been set up yet. He said the staff told the dentist he refused to go, but they didn't get him up out of bed to go to the dentist. He denied he had pain in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-24 · tag F0810 — isolatedProvide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide a resident with adaptive equipment at meals. This affected one (Resident #62) resident. The census was 87. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #62 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including dysphagia following cerebrovascular disease, unspecified asthma, unspecified dementia, left wrist flexion deformity, type II diabetes, and seizures. Review of the care plan, dated 04/16/21, revealed Resident #62 was at risk for decline in activities of daily living (ADL) function as evidenced by need for assistance with ADL's. Interventions included adaptive equipment including built up spoon/fork utensils, and plate guards. Review of most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/08/23, revealed Resident #62 had severely impaired cognition. The resident had no functional impairment or limitation in range of motion. Review of the medical record revealed Resident # 62 had physician…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview and policy review, the facility failed to implement appropriate infection control measure for residents in transmission-based precautions. This affected two (Residents #48, and #27) of four residents sampled for infection control. The facility census was 87. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #48 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including type II diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic viral hepatitis B, and chronic viral hepatitis C. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, completed on 11/03/23, revealed Resident #48 was cognitively intact, had no behaviors, did not wander, and did not reject care. Review of progress notes dated 01/14/24 at 5:37 P.M. revealed Resident #48 had a red rash under the right breast which was associated with pain. The nurse called the on-call provider and passed it on to the night shift nurse in report. On 01/14/23 at 10:51 P.M. the night shift…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-28 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespreadEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, and staff interviews, the facility failed to prepare an adequate amount of food to serve all the residents and failed to follow the prepared menu. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 87. Findings include: Review of the lunch menu dated 12/27/23 revealed lunch service included spaghetti with meat sauce, Caesar salad, garlic buttered dinner roll, Oreo fluff, choice of milk, and beverage of choice. Observation of the lunch service tray line on 12/27/23 at 12:05 P.M. through 1:05 P.M. revealed [NAME] #26 was serving spaghetti with meat sauce and ran out of spaghetti with five trays remaining and had to serve hot dogs or hamburgers as an alternative even though an alternative meal was not requested. During tray line observation, a regular salad had replaced the Caesar salad, and a garlic butter dinner roll was supposed to be served but was not available to be put on the trays. Interview on 12/27/23 at 1:19 P.M. with Resident #21 reported that she would have preferred to have spaghetti but…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation and staff interview, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve foods in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 87. Findings include: Observation of the kitchen on 12/27/23 at 12:05 P.M. and during tray line for lunch service revealed the Kitchen Manager (KM) #29, two Dietary Aides (#27 and #28) and [NAME] #50 were not wearing any hair nets. [NAME] #50 was not wearing a hair net to cover his beard and was observed assisting with the preparation of lunch. Interview with KM #29 at the same time verified the kitchen staff were not wearing hairnets and should be covering all hair with hairnets. Review of the Hair Restraints Policy (dated 11/05) revealed hair restraints shall be worn by all dietary employees while on duty to cover all their hair.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure kitchen was clean and sanitary. This had the potential to affect all 88 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 88. Findings include: Observation on 10/26/23 at 10:30 A.M. of the facility kitchen revealed directly inside the door was two coffee makers with unknown food/liquid spatters on all sides of the machines and down the sides of the stainless-steel table they were sitting on; coffee grounds were all over the table top; the steam table has unknown splatter marks on all sides of the clear plastic protector and down the sides; the electrical outlets on the floor in front of the steam table were covered with heavy accumulation of unknown splatter marks with one plug was being used with an electrical cord inserted; the floor under steam table has heavy accumulation of unknown dark brown and black substances; three metal stands with three shelves each were noted in the kitchen and had heavy accumulation of unknown dark brown black material on shelves and the lowest shelf was covered with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-21 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to administer insulin per sliding scale as ordered resulting in a significant medication error. This affected one (#90) of three residents reviewed for diabetic management/medication administration. The facility census was 88. Findings included: Medical record review for Resident #90 revealed an admission on [DATE] and a discharge on [DATE]. Diagnoses include pneumonia, asthma, shortness of breath, diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, vitamin B12 deficiency, major depressive disorder, fibromyalgia, hypertension, hypothyroidism, systemic lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, Sjogren syndrome, acid reflux disease and hyperlipidemia. Review of the completed discharge return not anticipated Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a staff assessment for cognitive skill revealed Resident #90 had modified independence for cognition. Resident #90 was not coded with any behaviors. Resident #90 requires extensive assist for bed mobility, transfers,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain infection practices by ensuring staff completed hand hygiene between multiple dressing changes. This affected one (#28) of three reviewed for infection control. Facility census was 88. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #28 revealed an admission on [DATE]. Diagnoses include intracranial injury without loss of consciousness, malnutrition, encephalopathy, paranoid schizophrenia, dementia with behavioral disturbances, cerebral infarction, schizoaffective disorder bipolar type, osteomyelitis of vertebra,and chronic pain. Review of the Comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment date 02/24/23 for Resident #28 revealed impaired cognition. Resident #28 was coded with verbal behaviors and rejection of care for 1-3 days during the look back period. Resident #28 requires total assist with two or more staff members for bed mobility, transfers, and toileting. Resident #28 requires total assistance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate post-operative care including failure to arrange for a post-operative surgical visit, assess and monitor the surgical incision, and arrange for or remove staples to the surgical incision. This affected one (Resident #75) of three residents reviewed for quality of care. The facility census was 91. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #75 revealed an admission date of 05/12/23 with a primary diagnosis of displaced comminuted fracture of the right femur. Review of the Resident #75's hospital note by Surgeon #645, dated 05/05/23, revealed on 05/05/23 Resident #75 came to the hospital complaining of right hip pain following a fall sustained while working on fixing a deck. X-rays showed a displaced comminuted fracture of the femur. The surgeon recommended surgical repair of the fracture to be done on 05/06/23 which included an open…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2020-01-11 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — widespreadHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interviews, observation, record review and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to address the resident's concerns in a timely manner. This had the potential to affect all 91 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: 1. During the Resident Council Meeting held on 01/07/20 at 1:30 P.M., the residents reported the process was to voice concerns at the meeting, a concern form was sent to the managers and they were to hear back regarding the resolution. They stated they did not feel they got feedback regarding their concerns. They stated they were not sure how to access the grievance process. During an interview on 01/09/20 at 11:35 A.M. with Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) #144, she stated they discussed the resident concern forms daily at a morning meeting and turned the forms over to the Administrator who delegated who would follow-up on the concerns. She reported residents can turn in the concern forms into any staff or staff who could help them…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2020-01-11 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — widespreadDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of personnel files, review of the Bureau of Criminal Identification and Investigation (BCI) log, review of the Ohio Attorney General's web site, review of the facility's abuse policy, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy to ensure employee fingerprints were obtained and sent to the Bureau of Criminal Identification and Investigation (BCI & I) for seven employees. Additionally, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy to ensure the BCI & I results were received within 30 days for four employees. The facility also failed to implement their abuse policy when a resident (Resident #1) voiced concerns of an allegation of misappropriation. This had the potential to affect all 91 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of BCI & I facility log revealed the following: 1. Housekeeper (HK) #137 had date of hire (DOH) on 10/23/19. The BCI & I was completed on 12/13/19 and the results were received on 12/18/19. 2.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2020-01-11 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespreadEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and a tray test of food, the facility failed to provide palatable food at an appetizing temperature. This had the potential to affect all residents of the facility except Resident #5 and Resident #29 who ate nothing by mouth. The facility census was 91. Findings include: Interview on 01/06/20 at 2:08 P.M. with Resident #62 revealed the meat did not taste like meat and the eggs were always cold. Resident #56 further revealed they used to be served juice and now only get kool-aid to drink. She revealed her husband brings in soup and crackers for her to eat. Interview on 01/06/20 at 3:43 P.M. with Resident #62's daughter revealed the food was garbage. She revealed one Sunday for dinner the only food served was corn bread and french fries. Observation and tasting of the test tray for the dinner meal on 01/07/20 at 5:20 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON), the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) revealed the meal consisted of chicken nuggets, sweet…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2020-01-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the Dietician Food Safety and Sanitation Checklist, observations, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure proper use of gloves, ensure hand washing facilities were available in the kitchen, and failed to date and label opened stored foods. This had the potential to affect all of the residents of the facility except two Residents (#5 and #29) who received nothing by mouth (NPO). The facility census was 91. Findings include: Review of the Dietitian Food Safety and Sanitation Checklist dated 12/24/19 revealed the kitchen and the dish room needed a good cleaning. The checklist revealed the floors needed mopped and cleaned and there were many food items not dated or labeled in the freezer, refrigerator, and the dry storage area. Observation of the kitchen on 01/06/20 at 8:44 A.M. revealed there was no soap or paper towels available at the hand washing area in the main kitchen. Interview with [NAME] #211 at the time of the observation confirmed there was no soap and no paper towels available. Observation on 01/06/20 from 8:44 A.M. until 9:15 A.M. revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2020-01-11 · tag F0868 — widespreadHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of the Quality Assessment and Assurance Committee (QAA) records and staff interview, the facility failed to have documentation quarterly meetings were held. This had the potential to affect all 91 residents of the facility. Findings include: Review of the records for the QAA Committee records revealed no documentation of quarterly meetings being held. for the past 12 months. Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 01/09/20 at 10:35 A.M., confirmed the facility binder documenting the monthly QAA meetings could not be found. The DON revealed the Medical Director reported she did attend QAA meetings in September 2019 and November 2019, however there was no documentation of the meetings.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2020-01-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide laundry services under proper infection control measures. Additionally, based on facility personnel records review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure five staff (State Tested Nursing Assistants (STNAs) #16, #85, and #95, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) # 54, and Registered Nurse (RN) #72) of nine reviewed completed annual tuberculosis (TB) screenings. This had the potential to affect all 91 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: 1. Observation and interview on 01/09/20 at 4:27 P.M. revealed Housekeeping Assistant (HSK) #69 was observed grabbing dirty linens out of bags with her bare hands placing them in the washer, with no personal protective equipment (PPE) on. HSK #69 revealed she usually wore Personal Protective Equipment (PPE), however she was about to leave for the night and just took them off. Further observation of the laundry room revealed towels on the floor around the washing machine. HSK #69 revealed they were to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-01-11 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant mediation errors. There were five medications errors observed out of 27 opportunities observed, resulting in a 18.5 % medication error. This affected three Residents (#15, #90, and #196) of 8 observed during medication administration. The facility census was 91. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #196's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/28/19 with diagnoses including osteoarthritis of shoulders and knees, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, major depressive disorder, and adult failure to thrive. Review of Resident #196's January 2020 physician orders revealed orders for Pepcid (ulcers) 20 milligrams (mg) twice a day, and Symbicort (inhaler) 160-4.5 micrograms twice a day. Observation of medication administration on 01/08/20 at 8:22 A.M. with Registered Nurse (RN) #143 revealed she did not have Symbicort or Pepcid in the medication card to administer to Resident #196. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #90 revealed an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident's wheelchairs and the glove dispensers were in good repair. This affected four (#210, #211, #212, and #216) of 99 resident rooms. The facility census was 91. Findings include: During an environmental observation tour of the 208 to 217 hall conducted on 01/10/20 at 9:29 A.M. with Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) #144 revealed the following observations: • In room [ROOM NUMBER], the resident's wheelchair armrest was noted to be cracked with visible foam. • In room [ROOM NUMBER], there was a wheelchair armrest cracked with visible foam, and the glove dispenser holder was broken with half on the wall. • In room [ROOM NUMBER], there was a wheelchair armrest cracked with visible foam and the [NAME] dispenser holder in the room was observed broken with pieces noted on the wall, with the gloves sitting on a box underneath. The resident in room [ROOM NUMBER] stated he was unsure of how long the dispenser had been broken,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-01-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff and resident interviews, review of the facility's Self-Reported Incidents(SRI) and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to report an allegation of misappropriation of resident money to the Administrator and/or designee and the State Survey Agency. This affected one (Resident #1) of four residents reviewed for personal property during the investigation stage of the annual survey. The facility census was 91. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, psychotic disorder due to substance abuse, delusional disorder, chronic pain syndrome and insomnia. Review of the five-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/04/19, revealed the resident was moderately cognitive impaired with no noted behaviors. Review of the facility's SRIs revealed there were no SRI involving Resident #1 for the month of 12/2019. Interviews on 01/06/20 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-01-11 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff and resident interviews, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to investigate an allegation of misappropriation of resident money. This affected one (Resident #1) of four residents reviewed for personal property during the investigation stage of the annual survey. The facility census was 91. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, psychotic disorder due to substance abuse, delusional disorder, chronic pain syndrome and insomnia. Review of the five-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/04/19, revealed the resident was moderately cognitive impaired with no noted behaviors. Interviews on 01/06/20 at 11:51 A.M. and again on 01/08/20 with Resident #1 stated she had five dollars missing from her room sometime before New Year's day, and she was not sure exactly when. Resident #1 stated she informed the staff of her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, staff and resident interview, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to treat and monitor a resident's shin wound. This affected one (Resident #71) of four residents reviewed for skin/pressure wounds during the investigation stage of the annual survey. The facility census was 91. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #71 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included type two diabetes mellitus, peripheral vascular disease and cervical disc disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/29/19, revealed the resident was cognitively intact with no behaviors noted. The resident required supervision with one-person assistance with bed mobility and transfers and supervision with dressing and personal hygiene. Review of the physician orders, dated 12/03/19, revealed a physician order to discontinue the current orders to the right shin, cleanse with normal saline, pat dry, apply non-adherent pad,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interviews, observation, review of the facility's policy and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident's practiced safe smoking. This affected two (#33 and #81) of two residents reviewed for smoking. The facility identified 13 residents who smoked. The facility census was 91. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #81 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included acute kidney failure, hypertension and schizophrenia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/31/19, revealed he was cognitively intact and required supervision with eating, dressing and personal hygiene. Review of the care plan revealed the resident had a history of smoking in the community, wanting to smoke at nonsmoking times and being allowed to smoke with supervision in designated areas at designated times. Interventions included securing his smoking materials at the nurse's station or other designated area. Review of the smoking assessment, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-11 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a therapeutic diet was was provided to a resident. This affected one (Resident #90) of four residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility identified four residents on a renal diet. The facility census was 91. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #90 revealed an admission date of 09/27/19 with diagnoses including chronic congestive heart failure, diabetes mellitus, and chronic kidney disease stage III. There was no evidence the resident had any physician diet orders. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/11/19, revealed Resident #90 had intact cognition. Interview on 01/06/20 at 2:32 P.M. with Resident #90 revealed she frequently received foods that were not on her diet, such as breads every meal, tomatoes, potatoes, cheese, and salty foods. Interview and observation on 01/07/20 at 1:04 P.M. of Resident #90 receiving her lunch in the dining room revealed a piece of chicken, diced potatoes, and spinach. Her diet ticket listed her diet as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-01-11 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy recommendations were completed and those completed were acted on in a timely manner This affected two Residents (#30 and #90) of five reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 91. Findings include: 1 Review of the medical record for Resident #90 revealed an admission date of 09/27/19 with diagnoses including diabetes, chronic pain, fibromyalgia, major depressive disorder, and hypothyroidism. Review of Resident #90's January 2020 physician orders revealed and order for Citalopram (anti-depressant) 20 milligrams (mg) daily, Duloxetine (nerve pain and anti-depressant) 60 mg daily, Levothyroxine (hypothyroidism) 25 micrograms daily at 8:00 A.M., Elavil (nerve pain and anti-depressant) 25 mg daily dated 11/18/19, and Dulera (inhaler). Review Resident #90's Pharmacy Recommendation dated 03/26/19 revealed to attempt a dose reduction of Citalopram and Duloxetine, or provide an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-01-11 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy recommendations for dose reductions were responded to for one Resident (#90) of five reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility further failed to discontinue a resident's psychotropic medication following a outside physician visit. This affected one Resident (#1) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication. The facility census was 91. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #90 revealed an admission date of 09/27/19 with diagnoses including hypertension, major depressive disorder, fibromyalgia, and hypothyroidism. Review of Resident #90's January 2020 physician orders revealed Citalopram (for depression) 20 milligrams (mg) daily, Duloxetine (nerve pain and depression) 60 mg daily, Levothyroxine (hypothyroidism) 25 micrograms daily, and Elavil (nerve pain and depression) 25 mg daily dated 11/18/19. Review of Pharmacy Recommendations dated 03/26/19 revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-11 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant medications errors. This affected one Resident (#90) of 19 reviewed. The facility census was census was 91. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #90 revealed an admission date of 09/27/19 with diagnoses including diabetes, chronic pain, chronic kidney disease stage III, and hypothyroidism. Review of January 2020 physician orders revealed orders for blood sugar checks before meals and at bedtime, Humulog insulin 17 units subcutaneously, three times a day, call the physician if blood sugar is above 300, and hold for blood sugar less than 100. Additionally, Metolazone 2.5 milligrams (mg) tablet daily as needed for weight greater than 165 pounds was ordered, as well as an order dated 11/19/19 to weight the resident daily. Review of Resident #90's January Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed blood sugar checks were not documented at 8 A.M. on 01/01, 01/02, 01/04, and 01/05/20, however the Basaglar…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and review of pharmacy information, the facility failed to remove medications when they expired. This affected one Supply Room of one reviewed for expired medications. The facility further failed to date insulin when opening a new vial. The expired medications had the potential to affect two Residents (#8 and #90) of two reviewed for insulin. The facility census was 91. Findings include: Observation of medication storage area on 01/07/20 at 1:35 P.M. revealed the Central Supply room contained four bottles of aspirin 325 milligrams (mg) with an expiration date of 08/19, two bottles of Iron 325 mg with an expiration date of 12/19, on bottle of stress tablets with an expiration date of 08/18, and one bottle of folic acid 400 mg with an expiration date of 04/19. Interview with Central Supply staff State Tested Nurse Assistant (STNA) #150 verified the expiration dates. Medication storage observation on 01/07/20 at 4:02 P.M. of the 400 hall medication cart revealed an open vial of Lantus insulin labeled for Resident #8. The vial did not display an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-01-11 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolatedProvide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure one resident was provided annual dental care. This affected one resident (#52) of 24 reviewed for dental services. The facility census was 91. Findings include: Review of Resident #52's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/24/17 with diagnoses including heart failure, spinal stenosis and pulmonary edema. Review of Resident #52's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #52's plan of care dated 11/15/19 revealed the resident was at risk for dental or oral cavity health problems related to assistance with oral care. Intervention included to ensure routine cleaning and check-ups. Review of Resident #52's summary dental report revealed resident was seen for an oral evaluation on 06/06/18. There was no documentation the resident had been seen since 06/06/18. Interview on 01/06/20 at 2:13 P.M. with Resident #52 revealed she had not seen a dentist…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-11 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of speciality diet list, observation, staff interview, resident interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide foods of similar nutritive value to residents who chose a speciality diet. This affected three Residents ( #79, #37 and #16) of three reviewed who requested a speciality diet. The facility census was 91. Findings include: Review of the facility Specialty Diet listing revealed three Residents (#79, #37 and #16) with Lacto Ovo Vegetarian diet. (diet consists of mostly plant based foods, dairy and eggs). Interview on 01/06/20 at 11:15 A.M. with Resident #79 confirmed being a vegetarian. Resident #79 revealed she often received an over abundance of carbohydrates and very little protein. Observation and interview on 01/07/20 at 4:50 P.M. of the evening tray line revealed Dietary Manager (DM) #350 plated all three vegetarian resident's meals with only sweet potato fries and cole slaw. Observation of the tray revealed no source of protein was placed on the resident's trays. The DM confirmed there was no protein source included on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-01-11 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — isolatedEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff, resident interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to offer snacks to residents. This affected two Residents (#1 and #30), of five residents reviewed for snacks. The facility census was 91. Findings include: 1. Interview 01/09/20 at 1:24 P.M., with Resident #1 revealed facility staff were supposed to offer snacks, however she never receives any. Resident #1 revealed she has seen staff pass by the cart of snacks, however she is never offered any. Resident #1 revealed her family brought in snacks because the facility did not provide them. 2. Interview on 01/06/20 at 12:08 P.M. and again on 01/08/20 at 8:39 A.M. with Resident #30 revealed the facility staff did not provided snacks. Resident #30 revealed the only snacks she receives were brought in from outside the facility. Interview on 01/09/20 at 1:46 P.M. with State Tested Nursing Assistants (STNAs) #9 and #142 revealed snacks were received after dinner and are put on a tray, then they walk around the unit. STNA #9 revealed there were some residents with snacks in there room, so the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2020-01-11 · tag F0568 — patternProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on facility record review, review of the facility's policy and staff interview, the facility failed to provide quarterly statements to resident with Personal Resident Trust accounts. This had the potential to affected 56 residents identified with personal funds accounts. The facility census was 91. Findings include: Review of the facility documentation related to Resident Trust Fund accounts revealed the facility provided evidence quarterly statements were completed by Business Office Manager (BOM) #14. Review of the documentation revealed no evidence the quarterly statements were provided to the residents or the resident's representatives. Interview on 01/07/20 at 9:35 A.M. with BOM #14 confirmed the 2019 third quarter Resident Trust Fund statements were not provided to the residents or the resident's representatives. Review of the facility undated policy titled, Resident Trust, revealed the facility will deliver a quarterly statement of the account to the resident or the authorized representatives .
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to AYDEN HEALTHCARE — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.1 | -1.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 1.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
The other 10 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.1★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KAZARNOVSKY, SOLOMON | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 50% | since 12/31/2021 |
| STEIN, ABBA | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 50% | since 12/31/2021 |
| CUSNER, ADAM | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/27/2025 |
| DEGYANSKY, JEFFREY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2020 |
| GOLDISH, ELIEZER | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/09/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365186. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-16, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.