Ayden Healthcare Of Fairfield
3801 Woodridge Boulevard, Fairfield, OH 45014 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 90 certified beds · (513) 874-9933 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited May 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (59) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 1.9% | 5.3% | 15.4% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 11.6% | 6.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.4% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 53.8% | 30.1% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.2% | 3.2% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 1.6% | 6.1% | 16.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 35.4% | 25.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 88.4% | 94.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 7.6% | 3.4% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 24.3% | 21.4% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 3.8% | 8.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 28.8% | 75.6% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 42.7% | 24.9% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 17.2% | 12.9% | 12.0% | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.62 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 89% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.3%CMS range 6.2–15.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.09 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 65.0 residents a day — about 72% occupied, or roughly 25 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.10 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.34 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.62 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.84 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.21 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.40 to 0.19 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
59 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 47 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-08-04 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, staff and physician interview, review of a self-reported incident (SRI), review of the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP) guidelines, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to monitor and identify residents with weight loss and failed to ensure appropriate nutritional interventions were recommended and implemented to prevent severe weight loss and adverse outcomes. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and the potential for serious life-threatening harm, negative health outcomes, and/or death on 03/13/23 when Resident #61, who was at nutritional risk related to a body mass index (BMI) (A measure of body fat based on height and weight. A healthy range is 18.5 to 24.9) of 15.8 (indicating underweight), diagnosis of muscular dystrophy, and decreased ability to feed self, was not weighed from 02/14/23 through 06/30/23. There was a lack of nutritional interventions to attempt to obtain Resident #61's weight while Resident #61 had decreased meal intakes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2023-08-04 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, staff interview, review of facility policy, and review of guidelines from the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP), the facility failed to thoroughly assess the resident's skin and failed to timely identify a resident's pressure ulcer until it reached an advanced stage which resulted in actual harm to Resident #14 who was admitted to the facility without pressure ulcers and developed an unstageable pressure ulcer to the left plantar foot. This affected one (Resident #14) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 60. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #14 revealed an admission date of 04/23/19 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic respiratory failure (CRF) with hypoxia, anxiety disorder, bipolar disorder, and polyosteoarthritis. Review of the care plan dated 05/02/19 for Resident #14, revealed the resident had a potential for impairment to skin integrity related to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to provide clean safe homelike environment for residents. This affected (Residents #5, #12, #52, #66, #6, and #28) of 22 residents sampled. The facility total census was 68 residents . Findings include: 1.Review of the medical record for Resident #5 revealed an admission date of 07/9/13 with diagnoses including esophageal obstruction, anxiety disorder, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #5 dated 04/10/26 revealed the resident had intact cognition and required partial assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs.) Observation on 04/27/26 at 9:15 A.M. of Resident #5's room revealed there was a large hole in the wall near the headboard of the resident's bed which measured approximately six inches by four inches. There was a broken window shade in the down position. The overbed light had no pull chain to turn on the light. The floor was sticky. Interview on 04/27/26 at 9:15 A.M.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-05 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — patternProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, review of facility Self-Reported Incidents (SRIs), review of police reports, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the failed to ensure residents' belongings and medications were not misappropriated. This affected four (Residents #71, #12, #40, and #62) of four residents reviewed for misappropriation. The facility census was 68 residents. Findings include: 1.Review of the medical record for Resident #71 revealed an admission date of 03/11/24 with diagnoses including Huntington's disease, major depressive disorder, dysphagia and anxiety disorder. Review of the care plan for Resident #71 dated 07/08/25 revealed the resident was at risk for exploitation and personal item loss due to impaired mobility and cognitive changes. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #71 dated 01/23/26 revealed the resident had severely impaired cognition and required staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of a local police report dated 06/12/25 revealed after an investigation CNA #600 was issued a summons for theft,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-05 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to follow the planned menu for residents receiving pureed and mechanical soft consistency diets. This affected 12 Residents (#21, #24, #27, #30, #38, #40, #43, #51, #54, #57,#64 and #66) who received a mechanical soft consistency diet and two Residents (#59 and #37) who received puree foods. The facility total census was 68. Findings include: Review of the diet orders on 04/29/26 at 8:10 A.M., revealed Residents #21, #24, #27, #30, #38, #40, #43, #51, #54, #57,#64 and #66 had physician orders for a mechanical soft consistency diet. Resident #59 had orders for a puree diet and Resident #37 had orders for mechanical soft diet with puree meats. Observation on 04/29/26 at 8:15 A.M. of the breakfast meal service revealed the [NAME] #104 served torn pieces of bacon to the residents on mechanical soft diets and no sausage was provided to the residents receiving the puree diet. Review of the spreadsheet at the same time, revealed the mechanical soft diets were ordered to receive sausage and the puree diets were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to follow precaution procedures for residents with orders for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). This affected four Residents (#02. #05, #07, and #19) of the five residents reviewed for infection control. The facility also failed to ensure hand hygiene was completed while passing food trays. This affected eight Residents (#38, #33, #57, #44, #16, #35, #61, and #14) The facility census was 68.Findings include:1.Review of the medical record revealed Resident #07 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included acute kidney failure, Hodgkin's lymphoma and retention of urine. Review of the physician orders dated 04/09/26 for Resident #07, revealed the resident was ordered to be in EBP due to multiple wounds and having an indwelling (foley) catheter Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed Resident #07 was cognitively intact. Observation of Resident #07's room on 04/28/26 at 10:52 A.M. revealed when…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-05 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the essential kitchen equipment was in working condition. This affected all 67 residents who received food from the kitchen. Resident #5 did not receive food from the kitchen. The facility total census was 68.Findings include:1.Review of a bid to replace the kitchen stove dated 03/20/25, provided by Administrator, revealed the most current bid for the stove replacement.Observations on 04/27/26 through 05/05/26 from 8:00 A.M through 4:00 P.M. revealed the kitchen stove was not fully functional. Of the six top burners, one burner was able to heat food. The grill top was nonoperational. During an interview on 04/29/26 at 9:05 A.M., [NAME] #104 verified his breakfast meal was to start at 8:30 A.M. but he could not get the meal completed on time with the stove not working fully. During an interview on 04/29/26 at 9:15 A.M. Diet Manager, (DM) #131 verified the stove burners did not fully function and the grill was not operational. DM #131 verified some foods had to be altered to a less fresh form, such as grilled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-05 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to maintain a clean, comfortable and homelike environment. This affected all 22 residents (#01, #02, #03, #05, #09, #11 #12, #13 #14 #28, #35 #48, #51 #52, #53, #57, #58 #66, #69 #90, #94 and #95) residing on the 200 B hall. The facility total census was 68.Findings include:Based on observations, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain a clean comfortable homelike environment. This affected all 23 residents residing on the 200 B hall, (rooms numbers 201,202, 203, 204,205,206,207,208,209,210,211,212,213 and 214). The facility total census was 68 .Review of the facility census revealed there were 23 residing on the 200 unit B hallway. Observation on 04/027/26 through 05/04/26 at random times revealed all the residents residing on 200-unit B hallway had room entry doors and door trim with removed and peeling paint on surfaces. There was an approximate 12 foot length by 12 inch section of flooring near the nursing station with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, review of personnel files, review of facility Self-Reported Incidents (SRIs), staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to report possible staff to resident abuse to the state agency. This affected one (Resident #62) of three residents reviewed for abuse. Based on medical record review, review of facility SRIs, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to report allegations of resident to resident abuse to the state agency in a timely manner. This affected one (Resident #19) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 68 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #62 revealed an admission date of 03/06/25 with diagnoses including anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, and essential hypertension. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #62 dated 03/14/26 revealed the resident had moderately impaired cognition and required staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs.) Review of the personnel filed for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-05 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, review of personnel files, review of facility Self-Reported Incidents (SRIs), staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to investigate staff to resident abuse. This affected one (Resident #62) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 68 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #62 revealed an admission date of 03/06/25 with diagnoses including anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, and essential hypertension. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #62 dated 03/14/26 revealed the resident had moderately impaired cognition and required staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs.) Review of the personnel file for Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #500 revealed it included a letter dated 03/28/26 written by Receptionist #125 dictated by Resident #62 alleging the CNA had sexually abused her almost every night and she had feared him for almost three months. Review of the facility SRIs revealed there was no report made to the state agency…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-05 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to timely start behavioral health services. This affected one (#30) of the one resident reviewed for behavioral services. The facility census was 68. Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #30 had an admission date of 03/19/26 with a discharge date of 04/30/26. Diagnoses include communicating hydrocephalus, cognitive communication deficit, and alcohol dependence with intoxication delirium. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed Resident #30 was severely cognitively impaired. Resident #30 had physical and verbal behaviors. Review of the care plan initiated on 03/20/26, revealed Resident #30 had a history of addiction related to alcohol abuse and behavioral problem related to combative behaviors. Interventions included psychiatry consultation as needed. Review of the physician orders dated 04/07026 revealed Resident #30 was ordered to be evaluated by psychiatry services. Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-05 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to serve foods at a palatable temperature. This affected three residents (#15, #52 and #66) of three residents reviewed. The facility total census was 68. Findings include:Record review of Resident #15 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #15 include diabetes, malnutrition, muscle weakness, unsteady on feet, repeated falls, heart failure, reflux uropathy, glaucoma and epilepsy. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) comprehensive assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #15 had intact cognition and required supervision with Activities of Daily Living (ADL). The resident received a carbohydrate-controlled diet. Record review of Resident #52 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #52 include muscle weakness, anxiety, post traumatic stress disorder, polyneuropathy, iron deficiency anemia. Review of the MDS comprehensive assessment dated [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 47 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-12 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure shower room equipment was clean and in good repair. This had the potential to affect 17 residents (#2, #5, #12, #13, #16, #29, #33, #38, #42, #43, #46, #48, #55, #62, #63, #71, #72) who the facility identified a using the shower room on the second floor. The facility census was 72.Findings include:Observation on 01/05/25 at 3:50 P.M. of the second-floor shower room revealed a single shower chair with a non-movable toilet seat. Under the toilet seat was a section of polyvinyl chloride (PVC) white pipe covered with brown smeared matter. Interview on 01/15/25 at 3:55 P.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #28 verified the chair was cleaned and the brown smeared matter was fecal matter. LPN #28 verified that the shower room and equipment should be cleaned after each use.Observation and interview on 01/09/26 at 11:10 A.M. of the shower room with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed the staff providing the shower are responsible to cleaning the equipment between residents. This deficiency represents non-compliance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interview, resident representative interview and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure resident or resident representative received notification/invitation to participate in care conferences. This affected three residents (#12, #5, #36) of three residents reviewed for communication of care. The facility census was 72. Findings include:1. Medical record review for Resident #5 revealed an admission on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to congestive obstructive pulmonary disease, anxiety, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, abnormal posture and bilateral osteoarthritis.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #5 revealed intact cognition. Resident #5 required set up assistance for eating, maximum assistance for toileting, transfers and bathing. Review of the plan of care for Resident #5 revealed resident is a full code. Interventions include education of the resident and responsible party as needed and review and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, and staff interview the facility failed to follow physician orders for blood glucose monitoring. This affected one resident (#36) of three reviewed for glucose monitoring. The facility census was 72.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #36 revealed an admission on [DATE] with diagnoses of type two diabetes mellitus, morbid obesity, depressive disorder, panic disorder and anxiety. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #36 revealed an intact cognition. Resident #36 required set up assistance for eating, toileting, bed mobility and transfers. Resident #36 received insulin injections during the assessment period. Review of the discharging physician orders for Resident #36 dated 10/27/25 from the previous long term care facility revealed an order dated 10/01/25 for blood sugar monitoring two times a day. Review of the admission physician orders for Resident #36 dated 10/31/25 was silent for blood sugar…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-12 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure staff offered and documented refusals to provide incontinent care to dependent residents. This affected one resident (#5) of three incontinent residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility census was 72.Findings include:Medical record review for Resident #5 revealed an admission on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to congestive obstructive pulmonary disease, anxiety, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, abnormal posture and bilateral osteoarthritis.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #5 revealed intact cognition. Resident #5 required set up assistance for eating, maximum assistance for toileting, transfers and bathing. Resident #5 is incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of the plan of care for Resident #5 revealed resident has a self-care deficit related to left sided weakness. Interventions include the use of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview the facility failed to ensure staff followed physician orders for medication administration. This affected two (#36, #43) residents of three reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 72. Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #36 revealed an admission on [DATE] with diagnoses of type two diabetes mellitus, morbid obesity, depressive disorder, panic disorder and anxiety. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #36 revealed an intact cognition. Resident #36 required set up assistance for eating, toileting, bed mobility and transfers. Review of the plan of care for Resident #36 revealed resident had an alteration in mood with little interest in doing things, trouble sleeping related to anxiety and depression. Interventions include administration of medications as ordered, behavioral health consults as needed and recommend the buddy system with care. Review of the physician orders for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were properly transferred using a mechanical lift. This affected one (#44) out of three residents reviewed for transfers. The facility census was 66. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #44 revealed an admission date of 02/15/24. Diagnoses included other sequelae of cerebral infarction, human immunodeficiency virus disease, hemiplegia unspecified affecting left nondominant side, cerebral infarction due to unspecified occlusion or stenosis of right middle cerebral artery, traumatic subdural hemorrhage without loss of consciousness sequela, nontraumatic subdural hemorrhage, osteomyelitis of vertebra lumbar region, epilepsy, hyperlipidemia, paroxysmal tachycardia, nonrheumatic tricuspid stenosis, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, opioid abuse with withdrawal, and unspecified viral hepatitis C without hepatic coma. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/01/24, revealed Resident #44 was cognitively intact. This resident was assessed to require…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-06 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to provide medication per physician orders. This affected one (#69) when the facility did not administer his prescribed Methadone (opioid) medication resulting in a significant medication error. This affected one (#69) out of three residents reviewed for medication administration. Facility census was 71. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #69 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of paraplegia, opioid abuse, auditory hallucinations, delusional disorders and congestive obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) discharge-return anticipated assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #69 had moderately impaired cognition and was always continent of bowel and occasionally incontinent of bladder. The resident required set up assistance with eating, supervision with oral hygiene and bed mobility, moderate assistance with toileting, dressing, bed mobility and transfers. Bathing was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-09-18 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespreadMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure effective pest control was maintained throughout the facility. This had the potential to affect the 66 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 66. Findings include: 1. Observation on 09/15/24 at 8:55 A.M. revealed Resident #13 was lying in bed asleep. The residents breakfast meal tray was on the bedside table. Three flies were observed crawling on the table and breakfast meal tray. Observation on 09/15/24 at 9:00 A.M. revealed there were two flies on the door frame of Resident #3's room. Observation on 09/15/24 at 10:43 A.M. revealed there were several gnats flying around the room of Resident #45. Interview with Resident #45 at the time of the observation confirmed flies and gnats were a problem in the facility. Interview with Resident #1 on 09/15/24 at 10:50 A.M. confirmed the facility had a problem with flies and gnats. Resident #1 confirmed it was hard to eat a meal without flies landing on the food. Observation on 09/15/24 at 11:27 A.M. revealed there were several…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-18 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on Resident Council minutes review, staff and resident interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure resolutions were provided to the residents after resident council meetings. This had the potential to affect all of the residents who attended resident council. The census was 66. Findings included: Review of the Resident Council Minutes from 08/28/23 through 08/30/24 revealed there were meetings but no resolutions to the problems discussed in the meeting. Interview with Activity Director (AD) #11 on 09/16/24 at 1:57 P.M. revealed she had been the director for three weeks. She stated she couldn't find any resolutions for the past Resident Council Meetings. During a Resident Council Meeting with Residents #1 and #13 on 09/17/24 at 10:52 A.M. revealed they have resident council meetings, but nothing is done about their complaints and they don't hear a resolution about the concerns during the next meeting. Interview with the Administrator on 09/17/23 at 3:30 P.M. confirmed she had not followed-up on all the concerns from the Resident Council Meetings and didn't…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-18 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — patternProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided to prevent a decline in nutritional status. This affected five residents (#3, #20, #34, #44, and #51) out of eight residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 66. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #20 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure, difficulty walking, and muscle weakness. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was assessed to have intact cognition. The resident was assessed to have significant weight loss and to have a mechanically altered diet. Review of the care plan revised 08/12/24 revealed the resident had potential for alteration in nutrition/hydration. Interventions included provide diet as ordered and obtain weights as ordered. Review of the active physicians order dated 03/14/24 revealed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-18 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to conduct proper medication regimen reviews by a licensed pharmacist as required. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure the physician responded timely to a pharmacy recommendation for Resident #51. This affected five residents (Residents #13, #27, #44, #51, and #57) out of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 66. 1. Record review of Resident #27 revealed this resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following medical diagnoses: cerebral infarction, human immunodeficiency virus, hemiplegia affecting left side, traumatic subdural hematoma, osteomyelitis, epilepsy, hyperlipidemia, malignant neoplasm of the ovaries, tobacco use, osteomyelitis, convulsions, atrial flutter, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, tricuspid valve stenosis, hypertension, depression, anxiety, opioid abuse with withdrawal, viral Hepatitis C. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed on 08/02/24 revealed this…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-18 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents knew what they were being fed on a daily basis. This affected six (#59, #64, #4, #38, #58 and #319) of eight reviewed for food. There was one resident identified as nothing by mouth to eat. The census was 66. Findings included: Interview with Resident #59 on 09/15/24 at 12:18 P.M. revealed he didn't receive a menu and didn't know what he was going to be served on a daily basis. Observation in the room revealed no menu. Interview with Resident #64 on 09/15/24 a 12:30 P.M. revealed she didn't receive a menu and didn't know for her three meals what she was going to receive. Observation in the room revealed no menu. Interview with Resident #4 on 09/15/24 at 2:14 P.M. revealed she didn't receive a menu and didn't know what she was going to receive for her three meals. Observation in the room revealed no menu. Interview with Resident #38 on 09/16/24 at 8:00 A.M. revealed he didn't receive a menu and didn't know what he was going to receive for his three meals. Observation in the room revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-18 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure meals were palatable and served at appropriate temperatures. This had the potential to affect 65 out of 66 residents as the facility identified one resident (#19) who did not consume food from the kitchen. The facility census was 66. Findings include: Interviews on 09/15/24 from 10:50 A.M. to 2:11 P.M. with Residents #1, #12, #13, #23, and #27 revealed the food was cold and not cooked properly. Observation on 09/16/24 at 11:30 A.M. of meal temperatures before the start of the meal service revealed the chicken thigh was 184 degrees Fahrenheit (F), the mashed potatoes were 183 degrees F, and the green beans were 181 degrees F. Observation on 09/16/24 at 12:33 P.M. of a test tray on the second floor after all resident meal trays had been passed revealed the chicken thigh was 100 degrees F, the mashed potatoes were 100 degrees F, and the green beans were 100 degrees F. Interview at the time of the observation with Dietary Supervisor #26 verified the temperatures and indicated the temperature should be at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-18 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were able to choose an alternative meal. This affected six (#59, #64, #4, #38, #58 and #319) of eight reviewed for food alternatives. The census was 66. Findings included: 1. Observation was made on 09/15/24 at 12:15 P.M. revealed there were not any postings for meal alternatives for the residents. Interview with Resident #59 on 09/15/24 at 12:18 P.M. revealed he wasn't able to choose from an alternative menu if he didn't like his meal that was served. Observation in the room revealed no alternatives for meals. Interview with Resident #64 on 09/15/24 a 12:30 P.M. revealed she wasn't able to choose from an alternative menu if she didn't like his meal that was served. Observation in the room revealed no alternatives for meals. Interview with Resident #4 on 09/15/24 at 2:14 P.M. revealed she wasn't able to choose from an alternative menu if she didn't like his meal that was served. Observation in the room revealed no alternatives for meals. Interview with Resident #38 on 09/16/24 at 8:00…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary kitchen. This had the potential to affect 65 out of 66 residents as the facility identified one resident (#19) that had not consumed food from the kitchen. The facility census was 66. Findings include: Observation on 09/18/24 at 8:50 A.M. of the kitchen revealed a large puddle of dirty water bubbling and pooling under the dishwasher that extended to the middle of the walkway between the side of the kitchen with the dishwasher and the other side that included the three-compartment sink. Interview at the time of the observations with Dietary Aide #21 verified the water puddle. Observations on 09/18/24 from 8:50 A.M. to 9:05 A.M. of the kitchen revealed a dusty vent above the steam table where food is served. There were also ceiling tiles near the steam table that were drooping and discolored. Interview at the time of the observations with Dietary Director #23 verified the dusty vent and the ceiling tiles. Dietary Director #23 stated the roof has been leaking, which caused the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-18 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interview, the facility failed to ensure kitchen equipment was working properly. This had the potential to affect 65 out of 66 residents as the facility identified one resident (#19) that had not consumed food from the kitchen. The facility census was 66. Findings include: Observations on 09/18/24 from 8:50 A.M. to 9:05 A.M. of the kitchen revealed the garbage disposal did not function properly, the dishwasher leaked, there was a broken oven and refrigerator, and the three-compartment sink did not fill and drain properly. Interviews on 09/18/24 from 8:50 A.M. to 9:05 A.M. with Dietary Aide #21, Dietary Supervisor #26, and Dietary Director #23 verified the malfunctioning kitchen equipment. Dietary Aide #21 stated the dishwasher had leaked for months, and a wet vacuum must be used to drain the three-compartment sink. Dietary Supervisor #26 reported rags must be placed in the three-compartment sink to keep it filled. Dietary Director #23 verified the broken oven and refrigerator still in the kitchen. Dietary Director #23 also stated the garbage disposal had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-18 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure to provide a clean and maintained environment. This affected 17 (#63, #06, #47, #21, #319, #65, #58, #64, #59, #38, #04, #66, #36, #43, #51, #20, and #26) of 17 residents reviewed for homelike environment. The census was 66. Findings included: 1. Interview and observation of Resident #63's room on 09/15/24 at 10:40 A.M. revealed the floors were sticky and the resident said they remain sticky. There was a light over the bed when she turned it on it flickered. She said it had been like that and she told the housekeeper about it. There were four scrapes on the wall behind the bed, holes in the wall behind the toilet paper, wallpaper coming off under the sink area, ceiling tiles warped in the bathroom over the shower, dust coming off the blind, frosted glass on the right side her window from improper sealing, the blind had a yellowish substance on it, cobwebs on the right side of the window, and there was water damage next to the air conditioner unit. Observation of Resident #6's room on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-18 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents had accurate advance directives in place. This affected two (#9 and #40) out of three residents reviewed for advance directives. The facility census was 66. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #40 revealed an admission date of 04/13/19. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, bipolar disorder current episode manic without psychotic features, hypothyroidism, and tremor. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #40 was cognitively intact. Resident #40 was assessed to require supervision for eating, partial to moderate assistance for oral hygiene, and upper body dressing, substantial to maximal assistance for bathing, lower body dressing, personal hygiene, and bed mobility, and was dependent for toileting and transfer. Review of the physician orders for Resident #40 in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to hold care conferences as required. This affected one (#13) out of one resident reviewed for care conferences. The facility census was 66. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #13 revealed an admission date of 02/06/17. Diagnoses included type two diabetes mellitus without complications, myasthenia gravis without acute exacerbation, cardiac murmur, psoriasis, vitamin b deficiency, syncope and collapse, anemia, vascular dementia, unspecified severity with psychotic disturbance, hyperlipidemia, major depressive disorder, and anxiety disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #13 had moderately impaired cognition. Resident #13 was assessed to require setup assistance for eating, and supervision for oral hygiene, toileting, bathing, dressing, personal hygiene, bed mobility, and transfer. Further review of the medical record for Resident #13 revealed no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received timely and required assistance with meals. This affected one resident (#51) out of the three residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) during the annual survey. The facility census was 66. Findings include: Record review for Resident #51 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including spinal stenosis, serous retinal detachment of the right eye, and feeding difficulties. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition. The resident was assessed to require limited assistance from one staff member for eating and to have highly impaired vision. Review of the care plan dated 09/09/21 revealed the resident was at risk for decline in ADL function. Interventions included to offer assistance with meals. Further review of the care plan dated 09/09/21 revealed the resident was at risk for impaired…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-18 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, staff and resident interviews, review of the activity calendar, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were invited and were able to participate in the activities outside of their room. This affected three residents (#38, #58 and #319) of three reviewed for activities. The census was 66. Findings include: 1. Medical record review for Resident #38 revealed an admission date of 08/01/24. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #38 was cognitively intact. His functional status was dependent for transfers. Review of the activity preferences assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #38 said it was somewhat important to keep up with the news, music, doing things with groups of people, and favorite activities. Review of care plan for Resident #38 dated 08/21/24 revealed he was at risk for alteration in activity participation. The interventions was to familiarize resident with nursing home environment and activity programs on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interviews, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for residents who smoke and proper storage of smoking materials for two residents (#27 and #65), and failed to provide proper supervision and services following a fall in the facility which affected one resident (Resident #44). This affected three residents (#27, #44, and #65) out of five residents reviewed for accident hazards. The facility census was 66. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #27 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following medical diagnoses: cerebral infarction, human immunodeficiency virus, hemiplegia affecting left side, traumatic subdural hematoma, osteomyelitis, epilepsy, hyperlipidemia, malignant neoplasm of the ovaries, tobacco use, osteomyelitis, convulsions, atrial flutter, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, tricuspid valve stenosis, hypertension, depression, anxiety, opioid abuse with withdrawal, viral Hepatitis C. Review of the Minimum…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-18 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident record reviews, staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure communication between the facility and dialysis center was maintained. This affected one resident (#18) reviewed for dialysis. The facility census was 66. Findings include: Record review for Resident #18 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including pleural effusion, dependence on renal dialysis, and moderate protein-calorie malnutrition. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was assessed to have moderately impaired cognition. The resident was assessed to have received dialysis while a resident of the facility. Review of the care plan revised 04/29/21 revealed the resident was on dialysis. Interventions included resident to attend dialysis on Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Saturdays. Review of the progress notes dated 07/01/24 through 09/17/24 revealed no documentation of the resident refusing to attend…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure accurate documentation of medications administered to residents. This affected one resident (#51) out of the five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications during the annual survey. The facility census was 66. Findings include: Record review for Resident #51 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including spinal stenosis, serous retinal detachment of the right eye, and feeding difficulties. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was assessed to have intact cognition. Review of the active physicians orders for Resident #51 revealed the resident had duplicate orders in place for the medications Guaifenesin, Glucagon, Loperamide, Omeprazole, Potassium, and Tamsulosin. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) from 08/01/24 through 09/15/24 revealed the scheduled medications Potassium and Tamsulosin had been documented as being…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-14 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff and resident interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of any significant medication errors. This affected one resident (#12) of three residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 57. Findings included: Review of the medical record for Resident #12, revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE]. Medical diagnoses included cerebral infarction (stroke), cancer, neurogenic bladder, diabetes, and psychotic disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment 3.0 dated 05/08/23 for Resident #12, revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Review of the active physician orders for Resident #12, revealed the resident was ordered to receive the following 6:00 A.M. medications: Aspirin 81 (over the counter pain relief) milligram (mg) daily in the morning, Furosemide (diuretic) 20 mg daily in the morning, Gabapentin (nerve pain) 300 mg every eight hours, and Tizanidine (muscle relaxer) 4 mg every hours…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-04 · tag F0680 — patternEnsure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, review of personnel files, staff interview, and review of job descriptions, the facility failed to ensure the services of a qualified Activity Director (AD). This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility with the exception of the 38 residents identified by the facility as not participating in activities (Residents #02, #03, #06, #07, #10, #11, #12, #13, #14, #16, #17, #19, #22, #23, #25, #26, #29, #30, #32, #35, #36, #37, #38, #40, #41, #42, #43, #44, #45, #46, #47, #48, #49, #52, #53, #55, #56, #60). Facility census was 60. Findings include: Observation on 07/26/23 at 10:00 A.M. revealed Activities Assistant (AA) #300 was leading a group activity in the common area with multiple residents in attendance. Review of the personnel record for Activities Director (AD) #225 revealed the employee changed positions from that of Assistant Dietary Manager to AD on 04/30/23. The record indicated AD #225 had enrolled in a course to become a qualified AD on 04/25/23; however, there was no documented evidence AD #225 was a qualified AD. Interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-10-28 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview the facility failed to report discharges to the Ombudsman. This affected four residents (#07, #29, #52, and #62) of five residents reviewed for discharge. The facility census was 65. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #62 revealed an admission date of 06/02/21 and a discharge date of 09/29/21. Resident #62 had diagnoses including heart failure and lung disease. Review of the Minimum Date Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident had no cognitive impairments and required supervision and assist of one with all care. Review of the nurses progress note dated 09/29/21 revealed Resident #62 had a change in condition requiring an emergency transfer to the hospital. Further review of the residents chart showed no notification of the residents transfer to the ombudsman. Interview on 10/28/21 at 2:27 P.M., the Administrator verified the facility had not sent notifications to the ombudsman. 2. Review of Resident #52 medical record showed an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-10-28 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and review of planned menus revealed the facility failed to prepare menus for mechanically altered menus in advance, have menu changes for mechanically altered diets reviewed and approved by a Registered Dietitian prior to service, and follow menus including portion sizes for residents on mechanically altered diets. This affected four residents (#22, #464, #04, #38) of four residents with orders for a pureed diet. The facility census was 65. Findings include: Review of the planned menu for the evening meal on 10/26/21 revealed that cheese enchiladas, Spanish rice, and refried bean were to be served. The pureed diets were to receive two #10 scoops (3.25 ounces each scoop) pureed cheese enchiladas, and #8 scoop (4 ounces) of pureed Spanish rice, and a #10 scoop (3.25 ounces) of refried beans, as well as a #12 scoop (2.23 ounces) and assorted beverages. Interview with Dietary Supervisor (DS) #91 on 10/26/21 at 2:50 P.M. revealed the facility was serving tacos that evening instead of enchiladas. At that time an amended diet spread sheet for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-10-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure that resident food brought in from the outside was properly labeled, dated, and stored to prevent the potential spread of food borne illness. This had the potential to affect 64 residents of the facility on an oral diet, as there was one resident (#57) who received only enteral feedings. The facility census was 65. Findings include: The refrigerators on the first and second floor of the facility, designated as refrigerators for storing resident food, were observed on 10/28/21 beginning at 9:49 A.M. with Dietary Manager (DM) #12. Observation of the refrigerator in the first floor pantry revealed a sign on the door that specified the refrigerator was for resident use only - all other food will be thrown away. In the freezer there were numerous packages of frozen convenience items including pot pies and frozen apple pies that were not labeled as to who they belonged to, or when they were placed in the freezer. In the refrigerated section the following expired food items, labeled with a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff and resident interview, review of the fall incident report, and policy review the facility failed to ensure care planned interventions were implemented to prevent falls. This affected one resident (#51) of 24 residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 65. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #51 revealed admission date 08/14/21. Diagnosis included cerebral infarction, type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM), dysphasia, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, occlusion and stenosis of right middle cerebral artery, peripheral vascular disease, acute kidney failure, metabolic encephalopathy, and chronic kidney disease. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #51 had moderately impaired cognition. The resident required extensive assistance of two plus person physical assistance for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene. The resident had one fall since admission with no injury. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-28 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure each resident's medical record included complete and accurate information regarding residents' weight status to ensure that unusual changes in a resident's weight status would results in timely investigation/re-weights and/or nutrition interventions as indicated. This involved two residents (#22, #30) of eight residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 65. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #22's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from an acute care hospital with diagnoses including atrial fibrillation, atherosclerotic heart disease, muscle weakness, dysphagia, congestive heart failure, Parkinson's disease, and dementia. Review of the resident's admission minimum data set assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairments and required the physical assistance of one to two staff persons to complete activities of daily living, with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff and resident interview, and review of facility policy, revealed the facility failed to keep all medications in locked compartments except when being administered by licensed nursing staff. This directly affected one resident (#465) of 21 residents located on the first floor Transitional Care Unit (TCU). The facility census was 65. Findings include: Resident #465 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cardiac arrest, acute osteomyelitis, diabetes mellitus type 2, ischemic cardiomyopathy, and cutaneous abscess of the left foot. Review of the resident's admission minimum data set assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognitive skills with good memory and recall. There was no assessment evident related to the resident being able to self-administer his medications. Interview and observation on 10/26/21 at 8:31 A.M. revealed the resident #465 was sitting up in his bed in his room eating breakfast. No one else was in the room, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-10-28 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolatedEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interview, and review of tray cards, revealed the facility failed to ensure each resident was provided with a therapeutic diet as order by the physician. This involved one resident (#29) of eight residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 65. Findings include: Review of Resident #29's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including encephalopathy, protein calorie malnutrition, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, diabetes type 2, chronic kidney disease, dependence on renal dialysis, congestive heart failure, and Alzheimer's disease. Review of the resident's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairments, required extensive assistance to complete activities of daily living, except for eating which she was able to complete with set-up help and supervision. Review of the resident's current physician's orders in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-01-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide any documentation related to the facility's Legionella assessment, control plan and monitoring. This had the potential to affect all of the residents at the facility. The facility census was 91. Findings include: Interview on 01/16/19 at 9:44 A.M., with the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the facility did not have any documentation related to Legionella. Interview on 01/16/19 at 10:38 A.M., with Regional Director of Operations #500 verified the facility did not have any documentation related to Legionella.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-01-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff and resident interview, the facility failed to serve dinner in a homelike environment. This affected 16 residents residing on the second floor. The facility census was 91. Findings include: Observation of dinner in second floor dining room on 01/15/19 at 5:37 P.M. revealed the following residents were served their dinner meal with the china plates left on the trays used to transport the meal from the kitchen to the dining room: Residents #4, #8, #19, #22, #23, #26, #30, #32, #40, #47, #53, #65, #70, #74, #82, #83. Interviews with State Tested Nursing Assistants (STNA) #164 and #185 on 01/15/19 at 5:38 P.M. confirmed they usually remove the china plates from the trays when serving meals, but that they did not do so on 01/15/19 in order to save time. Interview with Dietitian #171 on 01/15/19 at 5:40 P.M. confirmed the staff usually remove the china plates from the trays when serving meals. Dietitian confirmed she was unsure why STNAs had served the dinner meal on 01/15/19 in this manner. Interview with Resident #40 on 01/15/19 at 5:42 P.M. stated that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-01-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate two falls for one resident (#46) of three reviewed for accidents. In addition, the facility failed to properly store prescription medication for one Resident (#77) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. This had the potential to affect 22 residents (#4, #8, #10, #16, #19, #23, #25, #28, #29, #30, #36, #40, #46, #54, #57, #61, #63, #69, #70, #74 #76 and #82) the facility identified as cognitively impaired mobile residents on the second floor. The facility census was 91. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #46's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included psychotic disorder, hallucinations, dementia without behavioral disturbance, repeated falls, other symbolic dysfunctions, other conduct disorders, mild cognitive impairment, right hip fracture, nasal bones fracture and osteoarthritis. Review of the resident's plan of care (POC) initiated on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-01-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based upon record review, observation, staff interview, review of facility policy, and review of manufacturer's guidelines, the facility failed to ensure undated and expired injectable medications were discarded appropriately. This affected one (B hall/first floor) of one medication room observed. The facility further failed to ensure expired insulin was discarded. This had the potential to affect one (#5) of one resident reviewed for expired medications. The facility census was 91. Findings include: 1. Observation of the medication room on the first floor of the facility on 01/15/19 at 7:30 A.M., revealed four undated vials of opened injectable tuberculin (TB) testing solution and one opened vial of injectable TB testing solution dated 11/15/18 being stored in the medication refrigerator during the survey. Interview with Registered Nurse (RN) #194 on 01/15/19 at 7:33 A.M., confirmed the four vials of undated tuberculin testing solution and the vial dated 11/15/18 were not appropriate for resident use and should be discarded 2. Observation of the 100 B Hall medication cart on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-01-17 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman in writing upon the resident's transfer to the hospital. This affected two (Residents #49 and #439) of three residents reviewed for hospitalizations. The facility census was 91. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #49 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included encephalopathy, dementia, and chronic kidney disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/22/18, revealed Resident #49 was cognitively intact and was totally dependent on staff for activities of daily living. Review of MDS assessment, dated 01/08/19, revealed Resident #49 was discharged from the facility with a return not expected. Review of nurse progress notes for Resident #49 revealed resident was sent to the hospital on [DATE] per physician order due to chest x-ray result and presenting signs and symptoms. Notes on 01/09/19 revealed resident was admitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-01-17 · tag F0646 — isolatedNotify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to update the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) for Resident #46. This affected one (#46) of two residents reviewed for PASARR. The facility census was 91. Findings include: Review of Resident #46's medical record, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included psychotic disorder, hallucinations, dementia without behavioral disturbance, other symbolic dysfunctions, other conduct disorders, and mild cognitive impairment. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/18/18, indicated Resident #46 was alert but confused at times and required extensive assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of the resident's Resident #46's two-page PASARR results dated 02/21/13, revealed Resident #46 had no indications of serious mental illness. The resident received the diagnosis of psychotic disorder on 01/09/18. The medical record contained no evidence an updated PASARR was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-01-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide a plan of care for a resident's tracheostomy. This affected one resident (Resident #21) of twenty residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 91. Findings Include: Review of Resident #21's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/21/18 with diagnosis including anoxic brain injury and acute respiratory failure with hypoxia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/29/18, revealed Resident #21 has a tracheostomy. Review of the plan of care dated 10/29/18 did not identify or reveal any interventions related to Resident #21's tracheostomy. Interview on 01/16/19 at 9:44 A.M. with Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed Resident #21's plan of care did not identify a tracheostomy and did not provide any interventions related to the tracheostomy care. Interview on 01/16/19 at 10:38 A.M. with Regional Director of Operations #500 confirmed Resident #21's care plan did not identify or include interventions related to the resident's tracheostomy.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-01-17 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure resident care plans were updated to reflect the residents' current code status and failed to ensure resident involvement in the care planning process. This affected two (Resident #9 and #40) of three residents reviewed for advanced directives and one (Resident #44) of four residents reviewed for care planning. The facility census was 91. Findings include: 1. Review of the record for Resident #9 revealed an admission date of 10/13/17 with diagnoses which included epilepsy and anoxic brain injury. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident was cognitively impaired. Review of record for Resident #9 revealed a state of Ohio Do Not Resuscitate/Comfort Care Arrest (DNRCCA) form undated signed by resident's attending physician. Review of physician orders and Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated January 2019 for Resident #9 revealed resident code status was DNRCCA. Review of care plan for Resident #9 dated 10/18/18 revealed the resident was to be a full code. 2.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-01-17 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolatedProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's advance directives were accurate in the medical record. This affected one (#76) of three residents reviewed for advanced directives. The census was 91. Findings include: Review of the record for Resident #76 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia without behavioral disturbance and peripheral vascular disease. Review of code status form for Resident #76 signed by the resident's physician dated 10/23/18, revealed resident was to be a do not resuscitate/comfort care (DNRCC). Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #76 revealed resident had impaired cognition. Review of care plan for Resident #76 dated 12/17/18 revealed resident was to be a DNRCC. Review of monthly physician orders for January 2019 for Resident #76 revealed Resident #76 was to be a full code. Review of Medication Administration Record (MAR) for January 2019 for Resident #76…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-01-17 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's wheelchair was in safe working condition. This affected one (# 19) of two residents reviewed for physical environmental concerns. The facility census was 91. Findings include: Review of Resident #19's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included dementia without behavioral disturbance, dysphagia, heart failure, hyperlipidemia and hypothyroidism, Vitamin D and Vitamin B deficiency, and kidney failure. Review of the resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance with activities of daily living including bed mobility, transferring, dressing, toileting and personal hygiene. Observation on 01/16/19 at 12:47 P.M., revealed Resident #19 was sitting in her wheelchair feeding herself. The arm rest on the right side of the wheelchair was missing the arm rest pad. On 01/16/19…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-09-18 · tag F0730 — widespreadObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on personnel record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure State Tested Nurse Aides (STNA) were given a 90-day evaluation. This affected all of the resident's who reside in the facility. The census was 66. Findings included: Review of STNA #1's personnel file revealed they were hired on 05/22/24. There wasn't any evidence the STNA had a 90-day evaluation. Review of STNA #2's personnel file revealed they were hired on 05/22/24. There wasn't any evidence the STNA had a 90-day evaluation. Interview with the Human Resource Director (HR) #13 on 09/18/24 at 11:50 A.M. confirmed she was new to this position and the 90-day evaluations had not been completed.
- No harm found · C2024-09-18 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure daily staffing information was posted for residents and visitors to view. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 66. Findings include: Observation on 09/15/24 at 9:15 A.M. revealed no daily staffing information was posted in the facility for residents and visitors to view. Observation and interview with Registered Nurse (RN) #91 on 09/15/24 at 9:22 A.M. confirmed there was an empty plastic holder located at the nursing station on the first floor of the facility. RN #91 confirmed the daily staffing posting was normally placed in the holder but was not there. RN #91 confirmed she was not able to locate the daily staffing posting to put in the holder. Observation on 09/15/24 at 10:38 A.M. revealed the daily staffing information had still not been posted in the plastic holder at the nurses station or any other conspicuous area of the facility.
- No harm found · C2019-01-17 · tag F0575 — widespreadPost a list of names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups and a statement that the resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident and staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Residents' Rights and the Ombudsman contact information were posted. This had the potential to affect all 91 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of resident council meeting minutes from 01/23/18 through 12/26/18 revealed no updates of residents' rights pertaining to information by making formal complaints to the facility, the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman program or the Ohio Department of Health (ODH). Interview on 01/15/19 at 2:19 P.M., revealed Residents #2, #7, #10, #20 and #48 complained that the facility has not been informing them about their rights and denied receiving information on how to formally complain to the state about the care they been receiving. Residents in the council meeting also complained about not having the necessary information to contact the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman. Observation on 01/15/19 at 4:30 P.M., revealed a posting of Resident Rights on a billboard in the front of the facility but no contact information pertaining to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2019-01-17 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — widespreadHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure they had a grievance policy and procedure, post information on how to file grievances and designate a Grievance Official. This had the potential to affect all 91 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Record review of resident council meeting minutes from 01/23/18 through 12/26/18 revealed no information provided to residents on how to file a grievance, no information that how confidentially will remain if a grievance was filed. Interview on 01/15/19 at 2:19 P.M., revealed Resident #2, #7, #10, #20 and #48 complained they were unaware of filing a grievance. Residents attending the council meeting reported they were not sure who to go to when filing a grievance but was afraid that if they file one then it may get back to the person they filed a grievance against. Interview on 01/15/19 at 3:45 P.M., revealed Activity Director (AD) #208 stated she facilitates resident council meetings held once a month. AD #208 reported she goes over every department to see if residents have any…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to AYDEN HEALTHCARE — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.1 | -1.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 1.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
The other 10 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.1★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KAZARNOVSKY, SOLOMON | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 50% | since 12/31/2021 |
| STEIN, ABBA | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 50% | since 12/31/2021 |
| CUSNER, ADAM | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/27/2025 |
| DEGYANSKY, JEFFREY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2020 |
| GOLDISH, ELIEZER | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/09/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365738. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-09-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.