No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Ayden Healthcare Of Toledo

4293 Monroe St, Toledo, OH 43606 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 98 certified beds · (419) 474-6021 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (419) 474-6021 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0602) — cited May 2026Resident-funds citation (F0565)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited May 2026
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (62) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (60%) runs well above the national median (45%)
  • its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
4231 Monroe St Ste 1B · (419) 210-5212 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
4260 Monroe St · (419) 890-4748 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
2725 W Central Ave · (419) 517-7072 · Call to confirm hours
Park
2701 Farrington Rd · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
4227 Monroe St · (567) 698-8428

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased6.0%5.3%15.4%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.1%6.2%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms2.3%30.1%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%3.2%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened3.2%6.1%16.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication28.7%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine69.4%94.5%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers0.8%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control5.5%21.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table5.3%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine20.5%75.6%79.4%worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

42.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 30 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

42.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
0.34U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.17hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.12hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 57% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF42.5%CMS range 30.8–63.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.991.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.59
RN hours/ resident / day
0.92
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.94
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.45
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.43
RN hoursweekends
60.0%
Total nursing turnover
25.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 98 beds and averages 79.8 residents a day — about 81% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.45 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.59 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.94 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.11 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.58 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.65 to 0.43 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 60% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

26
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-07-17)
11
at the previous standard inspection (2022-09-02)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

62 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 51 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-12-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THIS DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENCE OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on observation, record review, staff interview, and facility investigation review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate staff supervision/assistance was provided when Resident #6 was rolled out of bed by an State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) during bathing. Actual harm occurred when STNA #400 completed a bed bath for Resident #6, who was totally dependent on staff for bathing with two person physical assist, and Resident #6 fell from the bed and sustained a closed fracture of the right tibial plateau and fractured the right sixth tooth. This affected one (Resident #6) of three sampled residents reviewed for bed mobility and transfer assistance. The facility census was 70. Findings include: Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure, paralytic syndrome following cerebral infarction, quadriplegia, dysphagia, urinary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-05-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure measures developed for Legionella control measures were fully implemented, failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions were in place for residents with indwelling medical devices, and failed to ensure proper infection control measures were maintained during administration of a subcutaneous medication. This had the potential to affect all 75 residents except one (#85) resident identified with orders for nothing by mouth, and directly affected one (#66) of one residents reviewed for dialysis and one (#68) of four residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 75.1. Interview on 05/06/26 at 7:50 A.M. with Maintenance Supervisor (MS) #260 revealed Legionella control measures being completed and documented included water temperature checks, flushing logs, and hot water tank servicing. No further documentation was provided for Legionella control measures. MS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident were provided a respectful and dignified dining experience. This affected one (#56) of four residents observed seated at the same table during meal service. The facility census was 75.Findings include:Observation on 05/04/26 at 12:08 P.M. during lunch mealtime revealed approximately 32 residents in the main dining room. Resident #56 was observed at a table with three other residents and standing to the left of Resident #56 was a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) assisting Resident #56 with feeding the resident lunch. Interview on 05/04/26 at 12:10 P.M. with CNA #130 verified she was standing next to Resident #56 and assisting her with lunch. CNA #130 stated she was not aware she should not be standing when assisting residents with meals. Review of the facility policy titled, Resident Rights, dated 10/2022, revealed residents have the right to be treated with respect, dignity, and care to enhance quality of life and individuality. This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-12 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY.Based on medical record review, review of facility investigation documents including written statements, review of pharmacy manifest documents, review of staffing schedules, review of narcotic count sheets, staff interview, policy review, and review facility corrective action, the facility failed to prevent the misappropriation of resident narcotic medications. This affected one (#86) of five residents reviewed for abuse, neglect, and misappropriation. The facility census was 75.Findings Include:Review of the medical record for Resident #86 revealed an admission date of 09/15/25 and a discharge date of 04/14/26. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic respiratory failure, anxiety, and cancer of the pharynx.Review of Resident #86's physician orders for active in April 2026 revealed she was prescribed the narcotic pain medication oxycodone 10 milligrams (mg)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-12 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, resident interview, staff interviews, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents received appropriate assistance from staff to maintain adequate personal and oral hygiene. This affected two (Residents #38 and #42) of four residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility census was 75.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #38 revealed he was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a cerebral infarction, type two diabetes mellitus, antisocial personality disorder, anxiety, delusional disorders, paranoid personality disorder, and schizophrenia.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/06/26, for Resident #38 revealed he experienced mild cognitive impairment, did not experience behaviors toward himself or others, and he refused care on four to six days during the assessment period. Resident #38 required set up and clean up assistance with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, interview with the local health department, and review of facility policy the facility failed to assist dependent residents with activities of daily living (ADL) care. This affected three (#26, #78, and #94) of four residents reviewed for ADL care. The facility census was 86. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #26 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage, dementia in other diseases, hyperlipidemia, and major depressive disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/21/25, revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired and required partial/moderate assistance with personal hygiene. Review of the care plan, dated 09/09/22, revealed Resident #26 required one person assist with bathing/showers and supervision to one person assist with dressing. Review of progress note, dated 02/20/25, revealed the nurse was informed by Certified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and review of policy the facility failed to provide treatment for pressure ulcers. This affected two (Resident #43 and Former Resident #9) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 86. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #43 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included paraplegia, chronic osteomyelitis, pressure ulcer right buttock stage 4, pressure ulcer sacral region stage 4. Review of the Minimum data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/18/25, revealed the resident was cognitively intact, always incontinent of urine and stool, and two stage four pressure ulcers. Review of wound care notes, dated 03/14/25, revealed Resident #43 has a stage four sacral decubitus ulcer and right buttock ulcer with bone exposure, no necrotic tissue or purulent drainage. Review of physician order, dated 03/11/25, revealed an order for wound care to the right thigh with instructions to cleanse with liquid…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure adequate toenail care. This affected two (#15 and #94) of four residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility census was 86. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #15 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included lymphedema, venous insufficiency, myiasis, essential hypertension, personal history of transient ischemic attack and cerebral infarction without residual deficits, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, heart failure, non-pressure chronic ulcer of other part of right and left lower leg with necrosis of muscle. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 01/28/25, revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required set-up/clean up assistance with personal hygiene and partial/moderate assistance with footwear. Review of the care plan, dated 10/25/24, verified Resident #15 was at risk for activities of daily living (ADLs) self-performance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure medical records were properly documented. This affected one resident (#73) of three reviewed for skin issues. The facility census was 86. Findings include: Review of Resident #73's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/27/22. Diagnoses included schizophrenia and metabolic disorders. Review of Resident #73's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed he had an intact cognition. He was independent for dressing and required supervision or touch assistance for hygiene. No skin conditions were noted. Review of Resident #73's most recent care plan revealed he was at risk for impaired skin integrity related to weakness, difficulty ambulating, refusing showers, refusing to take off layers of clothing, refusing skin checks, schizophrenia, and cognitive deficits. Interventions included to inspect the skin during routine daily care. The resident was non-compliant related to refusals of personal care/showers, refusing to change…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure infection control standards were maintained during medication administration. This affected one resident (#60) of four residents (#16, #37, #40, and #60) observed for medication administration. The facility census was 86. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #60 revealed an admission date of 03/13/23 with diagnoses of chronic respiratory failure, cerebral vascular accident (CVA), quadriplegia, and chronic kidney disease. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #60 revealed he was cognitively intact. Observation on 03/27/25 at 8:10 A.M. of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) # 221 completed medication administration for Resident #63. Concurrent observation during medication observation revealed LPN #221 moved her medication cart across the hall and began medication preparation for Resident #60 without performing hand hygiene. Continued observation of LPN…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-07-17 · tag F0730 — widespread
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of personnel files, staff interview, review of the employee handbook, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure state tested nurse aides (STNAs) received twelve hours of training annually and performance reviews were completed at least once every 12 months. This had the potential to affect all 67 residents in the facility. The census was 67. Findings include: 1. Review of the personnel file for STNA #113 revealed a hire date of 02/09/23 and had seven hours of annual training. 2. Review of the personnel file for STNA #116 revealed a hire date of 08/02/22 and had seven hours of annual training. The personnel file was absent of a performance evaluation. 3. Review of the personnel file for STNA #119 revealed a hire date of 02/21/23 and had five hours of annual training. STNA #119 had a performance evaluation completed on 06/17/24. Interview on 07/11/24 at 2:12 P.M. with Human Resource Director (HRD) #160 verified STNA #113, STNA #116, and STNA #119 did not have the required twelve hours of annual training, and verified STNA #116 and STNA #119 did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 51 citations
  • Potential for harm · F2024-07-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespread
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to store medications in a safe and sanitary manner and failed to ensure medications were not able to be used after expiration dates. This had the ability to affect all 67 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 67. Findings Included: 1. Observation of the South hall medication refrigerator on [DATE] at 8:59 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #250 revealed the refrigerator contained a brown liquid substance on the bottom shelf. Located on that shelf, soaked in brown liquid, was an expired vial of influenza vaccine. The expiration dated was [DATE]. Interview with LPN #250 on [DATE] at 9:04 A.M. verified the refrigerator contained a brown liquid substance and contained expired influenza vaccine. 2. Inspection of the North medication storage refrigerator on [DATE] at 9:19 A.M. with LPN #226 revealed a bottle of the neurotransmitter epinephrine was found with an expiration date of [DATE]. Interview with LPN #226 on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the refrigerators at the nurses stations for resident food was kept clean and food labeled and dated. This has the potential to affect all 67 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 67. Findings include: 1. Observation on 07/15/24 at 8:20 A.M. of the refrigerator in the North nurse's station revealed seven sandwiches in plastic wrap not dated and one baggy of lettuce, tomato, meat, and onion that appeared to be watered down with soggy and was not dated. There was also one carton of oat milk that was not labeled or dated. Interview on 07/15/24 at 8:23 A.M. with Unit Manager (UM) #109 verified the seven sandwiches were not dated and the baggy with lettuce, tomato, meat, and onions was not dated. UM #109 stated the food in the resident refrigerators should be dated. 2. Observation of the refrigerator in the South nurse's station on 07/15/24 at approximately 8:30 A.M. revealed six sandwiches wrapped in plastic wrap, one bowl of chili, and two take out bags containing Chinese food…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-17 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, staff interview, review of Resident Council minutes, review of call light audits, and policy review, the facility failed to thoroughly address Resident Council concerns in a timely manner. This had the potential to affect 18 (#1, #8, #9, #11, #12, #17, #22, #24, #29, #33, #35, #41, #44, #45, #49, #52, #53, and #65) residents who regularly attended Resident Council meetings. The facility census was 67. Findings include: Review of Resident Council minutes dated 09/29/23 revealed nursing concerns regarding food sitting too long on the food cart. Review of Resident Council minutes dated 11/27/23 revealed nursing concerns regarding, on the weekends, first shift food carts are passed slower. Review of Resident Council minutes dated 12/27/23 revealed nursing concerns regarding call light response times were slow on all shifts and weekends, and food/meal pass took too long at times. Review of Resident Council minutes dated 01/25/24 revealed nursing concerns regarding call lights, medication administration, meal carts, staffing, noise levels, and smoking times.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-17 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to conduct care conferences as required. This affected eight (#9, #14, #17, #30, #34, #57, #59, and #62) of 26 residents reviewed for care conferences. The facility census was 67. Findings Included: 1. Review of Resident #9's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/28/23. Diagnoses included infection/inflammatory reaction due to internal left hip prosthesis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, peripheral vascular disease, alcoholic cardiomyopathy, chronic kidney disease, alcoholic hepatitis, alcohol abuse, and femur fracture. Review of Resident #9's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed she had a high cognitive function. Review of Resident #9's most recent care plan revealed the resident was at risk for alteration in activity participation related to a significant health change. The resident tired easy and her pain level may hinder participating in activities she enjoyed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure the facility maintained safe smoking practices as care planned and per the facility smoking policy. This directly affected four (#33, #59, #64, and #328) of four residents reviewed for smoking with the potential to affect all 15 (#1, #6, #7, #27, #28, #29, #33, #34, #41, #45, #46, #47, #59, #64, and #328) residents who smoke. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were in place as care planned. This affected one (#14) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 67. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #59 revealed an admission date of 02/02/24 with diagnoses including cerebral infarction, acute kidney failure, hemiplegia/hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting the left non-dominant side, type two diabetes, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, major depressive disorder, chronic viral hepatitis C, hypertension,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-17 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain a safe and homelike environment. This had the potential to affect all 67 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 67. Findings Included: 1. Observation on 07/10/24 at 2:28 P.M. revealed water was running out of the fire dampers from the ceiling onto the floor in the South halls of the facility. Buckets and wet floor signs were in place on four of the areas, but three additional areas had water sitting on the floor. Interview with Maintenance Assistant (MA) #162 on 07/10/24 at 2:30 P.M. revealed the rain water was coming down the vents from the duct work. MA #162 also confirmed the fire dampers contained a black substance on them. Interview with Maintenance Supervisor (MS) #163 on 07/10/24 at 3:03 P.M. revealed the water was coming in through the fire dampers from the roof. MS #163 stated she had been caulking them, but it was not containing the issue. MS #163 also stated it was not connected to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-17 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, review of hospital documentation, resident and staff interview, and review of email correspondence, the facility failed to ensure meal accommodations were made to honor religious fasting preferences. This affected one (#21) of one resident reviewed for religious preferences. The facility census was 67. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #21 revealed an admission date of 02/06/23 with diagnoses of choric obstructive pulmonary disease, type II diabetes mellitus, and nutritional deficiency. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #21 had intact cognition and required setup and clean-up assistance for eating. Review of Resident #21's weight history revealed weights were obtained on 03/05/24, 04/04/24, 04/26/24, 05/02/24, and 06/03/24. No significant weight loss occurred between 03/05/24 and 06/03/24. Review of a nutrition progress note dated 04/16/24 revealed Dietetic Technician (ST) #261 recommended weekly weights…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-17 · tag F0640 — isolated
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure completed Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were completed and transmitted within required timeframes. This affected two (#43 and #61) of two residents reviewed for MDS assessment submission. The facility census was 67. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #43 revealed an admission date of 02/07/24 and discharge date of 02/27/24. Diagnoses included human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), malignant neoplasm of the rectum and anal canal, rectal polyp, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, and neoplasm of the colon. Review of Resident #43's MDS assessments revealed no MDS was completed for a death in the facility on 02/27/24. Further review of the resident's MDS assessments revealed the last completed MDS assessment was on 02/14/24 for admission. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #61 revealed an admission date of 01/16/24 and discharge date of 01/25/24. Diagnoses included acute kidney failure,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-17 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments accurately reflected the resident's status. This affected one (#33) of 26 residents reviewed for MDS assessments. The facility census was 67. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #33 revealed an admission date of 05/16/24 with diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and chronic respiratory failure. Review of the admission nursing observation dated 05/18/24 revealed Resident #33 received oxygen therapy at three liters per minute via nasal cannula. Review of the provider progress note dated 05/20/24 revealed Resident #33 required oxygen via nasal cannula and was receiving oxygen at the time of the provider's visit. Review of the comprehensive admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #33 had intact cognition and indicated Resident #33 was not on oxygen therapy. Review of a physician order dated 07/08/24 revealed Resident #33 received oxygen via nasal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to implement a care plan to address the resident's desire to smoke. This affected one (#64) of four residents reviewed for smoking. The facility census was 67. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #64 revealed a most recent re-admission date of 05/25/24 with diagnoses including intestinal obstruction, anterior dislocation of the right humerus, retroperitoneal hematoma, fracture of the right fibula, fracture of the shaft of the right tibia, hypertension, cognitive communication deficit, and post-traumatic stress disorder. Review of an admission smoking assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #64 was a current smoker and assessed as safe to smoke with supervision. Further review of the smoking assessment revealed a notation the smoking plan of care was updated. Review of Resident #64's care plan dated 04/16/24 revealed no smoking care plan as of 07/09/24. Interview on 07/09/24 at 10:15 A.M. with Director…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure consulted wound care specialist orders were completed. This affected one (#175) of three residents reviewed for wounds. The facility census was 67. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #175 revealed an admission date of 04/26/24 and a discharge date to home on [DATE]. Diagnoses included type II diabetes mellitus and cutaneous abscess of the left foot. Review of the comprehensive admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #175 had intact cognition and displayed no rejection of care. Resident #175 required substantial /maximal assistance for toileting. Further review revealed Resident #175 had an infection of a diabetic foot ulcer, a surgical wound, and moisture associated skin damage. Review of a consultant wound care physician progress note dated 04/30/24 revealed an initial assessment was completed on Resident #175 and identified she had irritant dermatitis from body fluid to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-17 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents had timely access to vision services. This affected one (#17) of two residents reviewed for vision services. The facility census was 67. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #17 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included other sequelae of cerebral infarction, chronic combined systolic and diastolic heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus, major depressive disorder recurrent, and schizoaffective disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #17 was cognitively intact and had corrective lenses. Interview on 07/09/24 at 7:59 A.M. with Resident #17 revealed his glasses had been broke for at least a month or two and indicated the glasses needed a screw replaced. Resident #17 stated he was unable to wear his glasses in the current condition. Observation on 07/09/24 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-17 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, medical record review, review of a mattress manual, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure pressure wound treatments were completed as ordered and wound care interventions were in place and functioning appropriately. This affected two (#16 and #56) of three residents reviewed for wounds and pressure reducing interventions. The facility census was 67. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #16 revealed an admission date of 01/28/21 with diagnoses of bullous pemphigoid and type II diabetes mellitus. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #16 had intact cognition and a stage four pressure ulcer (Full-thickness skin and tissue loss). Review of Resident #16's current care plan revealed he had a pressure ulcer to the left heel due to immobility. Interventions included to administer treatments as ordered. Additionally, Resident #16 had potential/actual impairment to skin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-17 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, resident interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure residents received timely and adequate assistance with incontinence care. This affected one (#62) of two residents reviewed for incontience. The facility census was 67. Findings Included: Review of Resident #62's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/25/24. Diagnoses included osteomyelitis the right femur, liver cancer, lung cancer, malnutrition, tachycardia, absence of the right leg below the knee, bone cancer, and a pressure ulcer on admission. Review of Resident #62's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a high cognitive function and required substantial/maximal assistance for toileting and rolling. Review of Resident #62's most recent care plan revealed he was at risk for impaired skin integrity related to weakness, difficulty ambulating, current wounds, cancer which metastasized, incontinence, cognitive deficits, pain, and depression. Interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-17 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, hospital document review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure physician orders and dietitian recommendations were implemented to address weight changes. This affected one (#21) of two residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 67. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #21 revealed an admission date of 02/06/23 with diagnoses of choric obstructive pulmonary disease, type II diabetes mellitus, and nutritional deficiency. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #21 had intact cognition and required setup and clean-up assistance for eating. Review of Resident #21's weight history revealed weights were obtained on 03/05/24, 04/04/24, 04/26/24, 05/02/24, and 06/03/24. No significant weight loss or trend occurred between 03/05/24 and 06/03/24. Review of a nutrition progress note dated 04/16/24 revealed Dietetic Technician (DT) #261 recommended weekly weights for four weeks and a nutritional…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-17 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, medical record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure physician orders for oxygen administration were in place prior to administering oxygen to residents. This affected two (#26 and #33) of two residents reviewed for oxygen administration. The facility census was 67. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #26 revealed an admission date of 04/06/23 with diagnoses of chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia and asthma. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #26 had intact cognition. Review of the medical record for Resident #26 revealed she discharged to the hospital on [DATE] and returned to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the physician orders on 07/08/24 at 1:30 P.M. revealed no current order for oxygen via nasal cannula. Further review revealed a physician order dated 06/09/23 and discontinued on 03/17/24 for continuous three liters of oxygen via nasal cannula.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered with a physician's order and were available for administration. This affected two (#55 and #175) of six residents reviewed for medications. The census was 67. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #55's medical record revealed an admission date of 05/05/23. Diagnoses included human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and bacteremia. Review of Resident #55's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition. The resident did not receive as needed pain medication. Review of Resident #55's care plan revealed the resident was at risk for alteration in comfort and was to be administered medications as ordered. Review of Resident #55's nursing progress note dated 02/04/24 revealed the resident complained of leg pain which was rated a seven on a 10-point pain scale with 10 indicating the highest pain level. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-17 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy the facility failed to ensure pharmacy recommendations were timely reviewed and implemented. This affected two (#14 and #17) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 67. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #14 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included type two diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery, heart failure, major depressive disorder, acquired absence of the right leg above the knee, chronic atrial fibrillation, and essential (primary) hypertension. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #14 was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #14's pharmacy medication regimen review dated 10/22/23 revealed an order clarification request for the anticoagulant Eliquis tablet 2.5 milligram (mg) with instructions to give one tablet by mouth one time a day for atrial fibrillation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-17 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure physician orders for gradual dose reductions of psychotropic medications implemented in a timely manner. This affected one (#17) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 67. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #17 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included other sequelae of cerebral infarction, chronic combined systolic and diastolic heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus, major depressive disorder recurrent, and schizoaffective disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #17 was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #17's medication regimen review dated 06/13/23 revealed a gradual dose reduction for the antipsychotic risperidone tablet 0.5 milligram (mg) with instructions to give one tablet by mouth in the morning for schizoaffective and an order for risperidone one (1) mg tablet give…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-17 · tag F0773 — isolated
    Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure consulted wound care specialist laboratory orders were completed. This affected one (#175) of three residents reviewed for wounds. The facility census was 67. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #175 revealed an admission date of 04/26/24 and a discharge date to home on [DATE]. Diagnoses included type II diabetes mellitus and cutaneous abscess of the left foot. Review of the comprehensive admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #175 had intact cognition and displayed no rejection of care. Resident #175 required substantial /maximal assistance for toileting. Further review revealed Resident #175 had an infection of a diabetic foot ulcer, a surgical wound, and moisture associated skin damage. Review of a consultant wound care physician progress note dated 05/07/24 revealed orders for laboratory testing, complete blood count, basic metabolic panel, c-reactive protein, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-17 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to keep accurate medical records. This affected one (#56) of 26 resident's medical records reviewed. The facility census was 67. Findings include: Review of Resident #56's medical record revealed an order dated 06/03/24 for the resident to obtain a Velcro wrist brace/splint to the left wrist/hand for comfort. Interview with Resident #56 on 07/08/24 at 9:56 A.M. revealed she was ordered a brace/splint for her left hand due to arthritis, but it was uncomfortable so she refused to wear the brace. Observation revealed the brace was in a drawer in the bedside table. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #215 on 07/09/24 at 2:08 P.M. revealed Resident #56 had her splint in place to the left hand. The resident had a gauze bandage on her right hand from surgery. LPN #215 stated she was confused with the surgery bandage and splint, and LPN #215 stated she had been signing off that the splint was in place when it was not including on 07/09/24. Review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-17 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure antibiotic stewardship was practiced when treating residents with urinary tract infections (UTIs). This affected three (#12, #18, and #50) of three residents reviewed for UTIs. The facility census was 67. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #12 revealed an admission date of 02/02/21 with diagnoses of type II diabetes mellitus and morbid obesity. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #12 had intact cognition, was frequently incontinent of bladder, and required partial/moderate assistance for toileting hygiene. Review of the June 2024 medication administration record (MAR) revealed Resident #12 received cephalexin (antibiotic) capsule 500 milligrams (mg) with instructions to give one capsule by mouth three times a day for infection, presumed UTI for seven days until finished. Further review revealed Resident #12 received…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-17 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of immunization records, staff interview, review of policy, and review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance, the facility failed to ensure residents were offered pneumococcal and influenza vaccinations per CDC recommendations. This affected two (#14 and #30) of five residents reviewed for influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations. The facility census was 67. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #14 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included type two diabetes mellitus and heart disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #14 was cognitively intact. Interview on 07/15/24 at approximately 9:00 A.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed the facility could provide no documentation to verify Resident #14 was offered the pneumococcal vaccine. 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #30 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included schizophrenia and depression. Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-17 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of immunization records, staff interview, review of a policy, and review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance, the facility failed to ensure COVID-19 vaccinations were offered per CDC recommendations. This affected two (#14 and #30) of five residents reviewed for COVID-19 vaccinations. The facility census was 67. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #14 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included type two diabetes mellitus and heart disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the Resident #14 was cognitively intact. Review of the immunization record revealed Resident #14 last received the COVID-19 vaccine on 08/11/22. Interview on 07/11/24 at 3:42 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed there was no further documented refusals or attempts to provide Resident #14 the COVID-19 vaccination booster. 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #30 was admitted on [DATE].…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure monitoring of a medication included obtaining blood sugar levels as ordered by the physician. This affected one (#2) of three residents reviewed for administration of medications and associated monitoring. The facility census was 75. Findings include: Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/13/21,with the diagnoses including: type 2 diabetes mellitus, morbid obesity, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, schizoaffective disorder, anemia, adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood, hypertension, psychoactive substance abuse and non-pressure chronic ulcer of back. Review of the most current minimum data set assessment, dated 02/01/24, assessed Resident #2 with intact cognition, required supervision/touch assistance with activities of daily living, occasionally incontinent of urine and continent of bowel, received antipsychotic, antidepressant and opioid medications. Review of a nursing plan of care implemented on 03/21/21 to address Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-06 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, policy review, and manufacturer instructions for use review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered by the physician and within prescribed time frames, resulting in delay in administration of insulin, and antidepressant medication. This affected one (#1) of three residents observed during medication administration. The facility census was 75. Findings include: Observation on 06/05/24 at 9:45 A.M., noted Licensed Practical Nurse ( LPN) #300 obtain a blood glucose monitor from the medication cart and proceed into Resident #1 room. Upon entry Resident #1 had concluded the breakfast meal consuming between 50-75% of the meal. LPN #300 obtained a blood sample from Resident #1 left index finger which resulted at a blood sugar level of 286. LPN #300 returned back to the medication cart and obtained a Insulin Lispro pen, placed a needle to the pen and returned to the room. At 10:00 A.M., LPN #300 dialed six (6) units to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a dependent received bathing and associated grooming. This affected one (#3) of three sampled residents reviewed for the provision of activities of daily living in a facility census of 73. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #3 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included myocardial infarction, coronary artery disease, hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, obesity, anxiety disorder, and chronic kidney disease stage 3. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #3 was assessed with moderate cognitive impairment, no occurrence regarding refusal of care, required substantial to maximal assistance for the completion of activities of daily living. Review of the 02/19/24 nursing plan of care addressed Resident #3 at risk for activity of daily living (ADL) self-care performance deficit related to (r/t) weakness, difficulty…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-28 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure incontinence care was provided timely to a dependent resident. This affected one (#3) of three sampled residents reviewed for the provision of urinary incontinence care in a facility census of 73. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #3 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included myocardial infarction, coronary artery disease, hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, obesity, anxiety disorder, and chronic kidney disease stage 3. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #3 was assessed with moderate cognitive impairment, no occurrence regarding refusal of care, required substantial to maximal assistance for the completion of activities of daily living including bed mobility and was incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of the 02/19/24 nursing plan of care addressed Resident #3 had bladder incontinence…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received ordered medications upon admission. This affected two residents (#15 and #71) of three residents reviewed for admission medications. The facility census was 70. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #71 revealed an admission date of 12/28/23 and discharge date of 01/19/24 with diagnoses including but not limited to metabolic encephalopathy, altered mental status, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, fluid overload, congestive heart failure, type two diabetes, unspecified convulsions, chronic kidney disease stage three, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of five which indicated Resident #71 had severely impaired cognition. Resident #71 required extensive assistance for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Review of physician orders dated 12/28/23 revealed divalproex…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-07 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide incontinence care. This affected two (Residents #4 and #5) of three sampled residents reviewed for incontinence care. The facility census was 70. Findings include: 1. Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including, a non-pressure chronic ulcer on the buttock and a history of urinary tract infection. Review of the bowel and bladder assessment, dated 02/15/23, documented Resident #4 was to void appropriately without incontinence but less than daily and incontinent of stool one to three times weekly. Resident #4 was assessed as immobile or required two person assistance with toileting, never aware of need to toilet. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/23/23, revealed Resident #4 was cognitively intact. The resident required maximum/substantial staff assistance with activities of daily living including toileting and bed mobility and was frequently incontinent of bowel and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-09-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observations, staff interview, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to ensure a clean and sanitary kitchen and utilized the appropriate hand hygiene when serving food. This had the potential to affect all residents, except Resident #55 and Resident #59, who the facility identified as not receiving food by mouth. The facility census was 56. Findings include: 1. Observation on 08/29/22 at 9:00 A.M. of the kitchen revealed a thick, heavy buildup of dirt, bugs, and an unidentifiable sawdust like substance on top of the dishwasher and on the windowsill next to the dishwasher. Interview on 08/29/22 at 9:08 A.M. with Dietary Supervisor #452 verified the buildup of debris on top of the dishwasher and windowsill next to the dishwasher. Observation on 08/31/22 at 11:00 A.M. of the kitchen revealed a thick layer of dust and grime on the kitchen exhaust hood, piping along the wall, and on the windowsill. Interview on 08/31/22 at 11:16 A.M. with Corporate Dietary Manager #498 verified the buildup of dust and grime stating they had cleaned some of it…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-09-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based observation, medical record review, staff interview, review of the facility's policy, and review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines, the facility failed to ensure staff wore Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) as required. This affected Residents #109, #110, and #111 and had the potential to affect all 56 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of Resident #109's medical record revealed Resident #109 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with no known COVID-19 vaccination status. On 08/26/22, the physician ordered for Resident #109 to be placed in New admission COVID-19 Quarantine; May discontinue after seven days with a negative test on day five-to-seven of quarantine. Review of Resident #110's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with no known COVID-19 vaccination status. On 08/26/22, the physician ordered for Resident #110 to be placed in New admission COVID-19 Quarantine; May discontinue after seven days with a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-02 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff and resident interviews, observations, review of the facility's policy, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's concerns regarding activities were addressed timely after the issue was identified during resident council meetings. This affected the four residents who attended the resident council meetings regularly, Residents #11, #39, #47, and #51). The facility census was 56. Findings include: Review of the Resident Council Meeting Minutes revealed there were meeting held monthly from January 2022 to June 2022. There were no minutes found by the facility for July 2022 or August 2022. Resident #11, #38, #47 and #51 attended resident council meetings regularly. On 06/29/22, it was noted the residents expressed concerns regarding lack of activities such as going outside and bingo. There was no evidence there was any follow up to the resident's concerns regarding activities. Interview during the Resident Council Review on 08/30/22 at 10:59 A.M. with the Resident Council President, Resident #47, revealed the facility had no scheduled activities…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-02 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interview, observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to ensure activity programs were designed, scheduled, and implemented to meet the interests and needs of the residents. This affected four (Residents #6, #7, #10, and #159) of four residents reviewed for activities. The facility census was 56. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #6's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/29/20. Diagnoses included hemiplegia, epilepsy, major depressive disorder, and stroke. Review of Resident #6's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 indicating Resident #6 was moderately cognitively impaired. Resident #6 was totally dependent on staff for transfer. Resident #6 displayed no behaviors during the review period. Review of Resident #6's care plan revised 08/29/22 revealed support and interventions for his preference to stay in his room daily and relax in his…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-02 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with wheelchairs that were appropriately fitting. This affected one (Resident #44) of 24 residents observed for assistive devices. The facility census was 56. Findings include: Review of Resident #44's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included epilepsy and morbid obesity. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #44 was identified as alert with intact cognition and required extensive physical assistance from one staff for bed mobility and transfers. Resident #44 weighed 370 pounds, utilized a walker and wheelchair for mobility, and was at risk for pressure ulcer development with no current skin breakdown. Review of the care plan dated 08/01/22 revealed Resident #44 was at risk for for pressure ulcers due to weakness, difficulty ambulating, obesity, diabetes mellitus type II, and congestive heart failure.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-02 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interview, observation, staff interview and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were transferred out of bed and provided showers as requested by the resident. This affected one (Resident #6) of four residents reviewed for choices. The facility census was 56. Findings include: Review of Resident #6's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/29/20. Diagnoses included hemiplegia, epilepsy, major depressive disorder, and stroke. Review of Resident #6's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 indicating Resident #6 was moderately cognitively impaired. Resident #6 was totally dependent on staff for transfer. Resident #6 required extensive assistance with bed mobility, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene. Resident #6 displayed no behaviors during the review period. Review of Resident #6's care plan revised 08/29/22 revealed support and interventions for self-care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's wheelchair armrest were maintained and intact. This affected one (Resident #11) of 24 residents reviewed for medical equipment. The facility census was 56. Findings include: Review of Resident #11's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included schizophrenia and dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] Resident #11 was assessed with intact cognition and required supervision with staff assistance with ambulation. Review of the nursing plan of care dated 01/17/22 revealed the care plan addressed Resident #11's activity in daily living (ADL) self care deficit related to schizophrenia (delusional psychotic paranoia), bipolar disorder, anxiety, depression, dementia, and generalized weakness. Interventions included uses assistive/adaptive equipment including as wheelchair, hemi-walker and cane. Observations on 08/29/22 at 9:48 A.M.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-02 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility's skin management program policy, the facility failed to ensure pressure relief devices were placed in use for a resident identified with a pressure ulcer to the hip. This affected one (Resident #55) of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcer relief interventions. The facility identified five current residents with pressure ulcers. The facility census was 56. Findings include: Review of Resident #55's medical record revealed Resident #55 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included acute kidney failure, adult failure to thrive, alcohol abuse, schizophrenia, and bipolar disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #55 had severe cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff for the completion of activities of daily living. Resident #55 was incontinent of bowel and bladder, received nutrition via tube feeding, was at risk for pressure ulcer development with one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-02 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, medical record review, and review of the facility's medication administration policy, the facility failed to ensure the residents received medications as physician ordered resulting in a medication error rate above five percent (%). There were four medications errors out of 36 opportunities, resulting in a medication rate of 11.11%. This affected two (#32 and #111) of three residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 56. Findings include: 1. Observations on 08/30/22 at 8:00 A.M. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #496 obtained the glucose monitor and proceeded to Resident #32's room. Resident #32 had concluded eating his breakfast meal. LPN #496 proceeded to obtain a blood sugar reading which resulted in error and at 8:02 A.M. obtained a second blood sugar reading of 235. LPN #496 returned to the medication cart and obtained the residents medications including lispro insulin four international units (IU) via syringe, proair hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) aerosol inhaler, and fluticasone furoate-vilanterol aerosol…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-02 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided adaptive devices to support independence during meals. This affected one (Resident #6) of six residents reviewed for meals and dining. The facility identified there were no residents who required adaptive equipment to assist at meal time. The facility census was 56. Findings include: Review of Resident #6's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/29/20. Diagnoses included hemiplegia, epilepsy, major depressive disorder, and stroke. Review of Resident #6's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 indicating Resident #6 was moderately cognitively impaired. Resident #6 displayed no behaviors during the review period. Review of Resident #6's care plan revised 08/29/22 revealed support and interventions for potential for altered nutrition and hydration. Interventions included a sipper (two handled lidded) cup and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-02 · tag F0888 — isolated
    Ensure staff are vaccinated for COVID-19
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, review of personnel records, review of Staff Vaccination COVID-19 log and infection control log, review of the facility's policy, and review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) memorandum QSO-22-09-ALL, the facility failed to ensure staff were fully COVID-19 vaccinated, had an approved exemption, or had been identified as appropriate for a temporary delay per Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance. The vaccination rate for the facility was calculated at 98.0%. The facility census was 56. Finding included: Review of the Staff Vaccination COVID-19 log, provided 08/29/22, revealed the facility had 99 employees with 69 employees vaccinated and 30 employees with a religious exemption. The Staff Vaccination COVID-19 log indicated 100% of staff were vaccinated or had an approved religious exemption. However, State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #432 and #466 did not have completed religious exemption forms available during the survey. This revealed 28 employees with a religious exemption indicating a 98% of staff were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-09-19 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to issue appropriate notifications of the ending of skilled Medicare Part A services. This affected one resident (48B) of three reviewed for liability notices. The facility identified six residents with Medicare as their primary payer source and discharged from skilled services in the last six months. The total facility census was 47. Findings Include: Review of Resident #48B's Beneficiary Protection Notification Review revealed Medicare Part A skilled services started on 07/09/19 and last day of covered services was 08/16/19. An Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage form was provided and signed 08/13/19. Resident #48B chose Option 3 I don't want the therapies listed above. I understand with this choice I am not responsible for payment and cannot appeal to see if Medicare would pay. No Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) was found. Interview on 09/19/19 at 12:37 P.M. with the Administrator verified the NOMNC form was not provided to Resident #48B and the wrong notification had been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-09-19 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to provide a written notice of transfer/discharge for one (Resident #25) of three residents reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 47. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #25 revealed an admission date of 11/21/18. Diagnoses included malignant neoplasm of unspecified site of right breast, anemia, constipation, lymphedema, major depressive disorder, single episode, dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere without behavioral disturbance, hyperlipidemia, unspecified injury at unspecified level of cervical spinal cord, and essential hypertension. Review of the residents medical record revealed the resident was discharged to the hospital on [DATE] for pitting edema to the right arm, the resident was readmitted on [DATE]. On 06/10/19, the resident was at a lymphedema clinic, was admitted to the hospital from there for bleeding from right arm and readmitted to the facility on [DATE].…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-09-19 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide bed-hold policy information to residents at the time of hospital transfer. This affected three (Resident #48A, Resident #13 and Resident #25) of three reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 47. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #48A's medical record revealed an admission date of 05/15/19 and a discharge date of 06/28/19. Diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure, insomnia, acute embolism and thrombosis of deep vein of right lower extremity, type II diabetes, sleep apnea, anemia, major depressive disorder, hyperlipidemia, pain, fibromyalgia, COPD, anxiety disorder, obesity, heart failure, and gout. Review of Resident #48A's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed an Entry MDS was completed 05/15/19 and a Discharge Return Not Anticipated MDS was completed 06/21/19. Review of Resident #48A's progress notes revealed Resident #48A was transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-09-19 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to assess residents for risk of unsafe wandering and continued use of wander guard ankle bracelet alarms as an intervention. This affected one (Resident #18) of one reviewed for wandering and elopement. The facility identified three residents with wander guards in place. The facility census was 47. Findings Include: Review of Resident #18's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/18/15. Diagnoses included heart disease, hypokalemia, dementia, major depressive disorder, hyperlipidemia, hypothyroidism, hypertension, calculus of kidney, and anxiety disorder. Review of Resident #18's physician's order revealed an order dated 05/24/18 for an alert bracelet to the left ankle and to check placement every shift. Check function on night shift for the diagnosis of dementia. Review of Resident #18's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments dated 08/07/18, 11/01/18, and 01/29/19, indicated the resident used a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-09-19 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure ongoing individualized activities were provided. This affected one (Resident #34) of twelve residents reviewed for activity involvement in a facility census of 47. Findings include; Review of Resident #34's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including, dementia, dysphagia, chronic kidney disease, low back pain, muscle weakness, major depression, osteoarthritis, and history of venous thrombosis and embolism. Review of the most current minimum data set assessment (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #34 had adequate hearing, ability to understand/understood, visual impairment without the use of corrective lenses, severely impaired cognition, no behavioral symptoms including refusal of care, and total dependence on staff for the completion of activities of daily living. Review of the residents plan of care dated 05/25/18 revealed plan of care was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-09-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide care and services as ordered and care planned for constipation. This affected one (Resident #25) of five resident's reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 47. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #25 revealed an admission date of 11/21/18. Diagnoses included malignant neoplasm of unspecified site of right breast, anemia, constipation, lymphedema, major depressive disorder, single episode, dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere without behavioral disturbance, hyperlipidemia, unspecified injury at unspecified level of cervical spinal cord, and essential hypertension. Review of the care plan dated 08/19/19 revealed Resident #25 was on pain medication therapy related to breast cancer, surgical wounds, and lymphedema. Resident #25 was at risk for communication and cognitive deficits in the areas of receptive and expressive language impacting resident's ability to effectively…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-09-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, resident interview, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents' smoking materials were kept secured. This affected two residents, (Resident #9 and #199) of two reviewed for smoking. The facility identified nine residents who smoked. The facility census was 47. Findings Include: 1. Review of Resident #199's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/04/19. Diagnosis included type II diabetes, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, hypertension, tachycardia, heart disease, hyperlipidemia, fibromyalgia, lupus, and anxiety. Review of Resident #199's smoking assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #199 smoked ten or more times per days. Resident #199 was able to light her own cigarettes. Resident #199 needed the facility to store the lighter and cigarettes and had a plan of care in use to assure the resident was safe while smoking. Review of Resident #199's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-09-19 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and dietary menu spreadsheet, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with adequate nutrition and therapeutic diets. This affected one (Resident #28) of three residents reviewed for nutrition in a facility census of 47. Findings include: Resident #28 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses including, congestive heart failure, dysphagia, depression, acute respiratory failure, history of pulmonary edema, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, anemia, type II diabetes mellitus with neuropathy, end stage renal disease receiving hemodialysis, atrial fibrillation, metabolic encephalopathy, coronary artery disease, arteriovenous fistula, and fibromyalgia. On 02/04/19, a plan of care was implemented to address the residents need for dialysis related to renal failure, hyperlipidemia, proteinuria and adenoma. Interventions included daily weights, diagnostic test as ordered, and attends dialysis on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. On 03/29/19, a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-09-19 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and facility medication administration via enteral tube policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications administered via Gastrostomy tube (G-tube) were provided in accordance with facility policy which resulted in a medication error rate of greater than five percent (5%). A total of 28 opportunities were observed with six medication errors for a medication error rate of 21.43 %. This affected one (Resident #13) of four residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 47. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #13 noted the following physician orders; 05/07/19, lexapro 10 milligrams (mg) daily via G-tube, 06/21/19, norvasc 5 mg daily via-G-tube, aspirin 81 mg chewable via G-tube, eliquis 2.5 mg twice daily via G-tube, lisinopril 10 mg once daily via G-tube, and lopressor (metoprolol) 25 mg twice daily via G-tube. On 09/02/19, give 20 milliequivalents (meq) per(/) 15 milliliters (ml) liquid potassium daily via G-tube. No physician order for crushing or cocktailing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2024-07-17 · tag F0577 — widespread
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview, and staff interview the facility failed to post a notice of the availability of survey results from the preceding three years is areas of the facility that are prominent and accessible to the public. This had the potential to affect all 67 residents. The facility census was 67. Findings include: Observation on 07/15/24 at 8:57 A.M. of all hallways revealed no signage noted regarding the location of the survey results binder or how to access the survey results. Interview on 07/11/24 at 9:11 A.M. with Resident #9 revealed the resident did not know where the survey results binder was located. Interview on 07/11/24 at 9:59 A.M. with State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #121 revealed the survey binder was located on the bookshelf outside of the locked doors as you enter the facility. STNA #121 verified there was not a posting as to where to find the survey results. STNA #121 stated the residents could see the binder if they went out and families could see it when they came in the facility. Observation on 07/11/24 at 10:04 A.M. of the survey binder in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AYDEN HEALTHCARE — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.1-0.1 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 51.9-0.9 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 51.8+1.2 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.5+0.5 vs chain
The other 10 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.1★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
BUCKEYE FAMILY TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL51%since 12/31/2025
ASCHENDORF, JONATHANIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2023
KAPLAN, YISROELIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/31/2021
LAHASKY, EPHRAMIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/31/2025
AFTAB, ZAHRAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2024
WASHINGTON, KATINAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/22/2022

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-17.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$825K
Related-party expense11% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 83%Medicare 3%Other / private 14%

About 83% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $825K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$313per resident / day
operating cost
$9,519per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$267per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365849. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-07-17, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next