Ayden Healthcare Of Oregon
3953 Navarre Ave, Oregon, OH 43616 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 99 certified beds · (419) 698-4521 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high number of inspection citations overall (49) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (59%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 5.9% | 5.3% | 15.4% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.5% | 6.2% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.5% | 0.4% | 2.0% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 7.1% | 30.1% | 6.5% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.4% | 3.2% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 4.2% | 6.1% | 16.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 28.6% | 25.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 90.6% | 94.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.0% | 3.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 16.2% | 21.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 4.1% | 8.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 34.7% | 75.6% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 28.6% | 24.9% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 19.7% | 12.9% | 12.0% | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
51.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 42 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 58% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 30% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 51.5%CMS range 36.0–68.4 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 13.1%CMS range 9.1–17.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 70.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.09 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 85.7 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.54 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.38 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.99 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.11 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.71 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.43 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 59% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
49 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 39 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-03 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure pressure ulcer wound dressings were in place and further failed to ensure pressure ulcer preventative interventions were implemented. This affected one (#25) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 86. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #25 revealed an admission date of 09/24/25. Diagnoses included paraplegia, polyneuropathy, pressure ulcer of right buttocks stage IV, and pressure ulcer of sacral region, stage IV.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed this resident had intact cognition as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15. Resident #25 had two unhealed stage IV pressure ulcers. Review of the care plan dated 05/21/26 revealed Resident #25 was at risk for impaired skin integrity related to incontinence, decreased mobility, current wounds, and osteomyelitis.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure interventions and wound treatments were implemented as physician ordered and with appropriate technique. This affected two (#1 and #2) of three residents reviewed for wound care. The facility census was 88. Findings include:1. Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/04/25, with diagnoses including dementia, acute respiratory failure, Type II diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, dysphagia, history of aspiration pneumonia, gastrostomy (G-tube), and hypertension.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/04/26, revealed Resident #1 was in a persistent vegetative state, was unable to make needs known, was severely cognitively impaired, was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living (ADLs), was incontinent of bowel and bladder, had no known weight loss, received all nutrition via feeding tube, was at risk for pressure ulcer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure timely and effective incontinence care was provided. This affected two (#1 and #2) of three residents reviewed for incontinence care. The facility census was 88. Findings include:1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #2 admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including paraplegia, chronic osteomyelitis, pressure ulcer stage IV to the right buttock and sacral region, anemia, polyneuropathy, hypertension, depression, history of venous thrombosis and embolism, and mild intellectual disabilities.Review of the MDS assessment, dated 12/18/25, revealed Resident #2 had intact cognition, had no behaviors, had bilateral lower extremity range of motion impairment, was dependent on staff for completion of ADLs, required partial to moderate assistance with bed mobility, was incontinent of bowel and bladder, and was at risk for pressure ulcer development. Resident #2 admitted with two stage IV pressure ulcers.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure gastrostomy tube (G-tube) care and maintenance were provided as ordered. This affected one (#1) of three residents reviewed for G-tube care. The facility identified two (#24 and #33) additional residents who had a G-tube. The facility census was 88. Findings include:Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/04/25, with diagnoses including dementia, acute respiratory failure, Type II diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, dysphagia, history of aspiration pneumonia, gastrostomy (G-tube), and hypertension.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/04/26, revealed Resident #1 was in a persistent vegetative state, was unable to make needs known, was severely cognitively impaired, was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living (ADLs), was incontinent of bowel and bladder, had no known weight loss, received all nutrition via feeding tube, was at risk for pressure ulcer development with no skin breakdown, and received anticoagulant and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the medical record, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure enhanced barriers precautions (EBP) were implemented. This affected two (#1, #3) of three residents reviewed for infection control. The facility identified 26 (#1, #2, #3, #15, #16, #17, #18, #19, #20, #21, #22, #23, #24, #25, #26, #27, #28, #29, #30, #31, #32, #33, #34, #35, #36, and #37) residents on EBP. The facility census was 88. Findings include:1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #1 admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including dementia, acute respiratory failure, Type II diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, dysphagia, history of aspiration pneumonia, gastrostomy (G-tube), and hypertension.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/04/26, revealed Resident #1 was in a persistent vegetative state, was unable to make needs known, had severe cognitive impairment, was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living (ADLs),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain a safe and sanitary environment by containing cigarettes in approved extinguishment receptacles. This affected 17 residents (#1, #3, #22, #23, #29, #34, #38, #40, #41, #51, #52, #53, #55, #56, #57, #66, #70) identified as independent of unsupervised smokers and an additional 32 residents (#2, #6, #5, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13, #14, #15, #16, #47, #48, #49, #50, #54, #57, #58, #59, #60, #61, #62, #63, #64, #65, #67, #68, #69, #71, #72) residing on the south end of the building. Facility census 79. Findings include:Observation of the south 300 resident community room on 02/23/26 at 8:54 A.M. revealed four extinguished cigarette butts on the carpeted floor. A plastic trash can was identified inside the building near the outside exit door to the designated independent smoking area. The trash can had multiple paper and styrofoam items inside with multiple extinguished cigarettes inside. Continued observation located outside the community room exit door discovered greater than 17 extinguished cigarettes were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure proper hand sanitation was maintained during meal preparation and dining service. This affected 78 current residents identified to receive meals from the facility kitchen excluding one resident (#18) receiving nutrition via feeding tube. Findings include: On 02/23/26 at 12:09 P.M. observation during the lunch meal service noted Dietary Aide (DA) #201 wearing single use plastic gloves while handling empty individual meal trays. DA #201 proceeded to handle soiled meal trays and handled the commercial dishwasher while placing the soiled trays inside. DA #201 removed the clean trays and returned to the serving line without changing gloves or washing hands. DA #201 began handling clean utensils and placing meal tickets to the clean meal trays without changing the gloves. At 12:14 P.M. DA #201 handled tray meal tickets with gloves and the tickets fell to the floor. DA #201 proceeded to pick the tickets off the floor and placed them to the clean meal trays on the meal service line. DA #201…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-24 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure resident common showers, and common area corridors were properly cleaned and maintained. This affected 68 current residents excluding 11 residents (#6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13, #14, #15, #16) residing on the medbridge unit. Facility census 79. Findings include:1. Observation on 02/24/26 at 6:09 A.M. noted the north common shower room left stall with a black substance along the edge of the floor and wall. Next to the wall mounted seat on the left revealed an approximate one foot by 8 inch section of missing ceramic tile which exposed the structural backing or [NAME] board, and a one inch diameter hole through the wall ([NAME] board). 2. Observation on 02/24/26 at 6:14 A.M. noted the south common shower room with a soiled brief on the floor in front of the sink. A brown substance with pealing caulk was identified around the base of the toilet. Inside the left shower stall revealed a black substance between the shower stall floor and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespreadEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, review of medication refrigerator temperature logs, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored in a safe and secure manner. This had the potential to affect all 90 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 90.Findings include:1. Observation on 12/22/25 at 9:55 A.M. of the medication refrigerator located at the North nurse station revealed the current temperature check log was incomplete as there were no temperatures recorded on 12/05/25, 12/09/25, 12/15/25, 12/16/25, and 12/19/25. Review of a facility temperature log for November 2025 for the medication refrigerator located at the North nurse station revealed temperatures had not been recorded on 11/07/25, 11/10/25, 11/11/25, and 11/28/25. Review of a facility temperature log for October 2025 for the medication refrigerator located at the North nurse station revealed temperatures had not been recorded on 10/03/25, 10/06/25, 10/07/25,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, resident and staff interview, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to maintain a clean and homelike environment. This affected two (#268 and #269) of 15 residents residing on the 200 hall. The facility census was 90.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #268 revealed she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included urinary retention, chronic pulmonary embolism, depression, hyperlipidemia, and bipolar disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #268 was cognitively intact and did not exhibit behaviors at the time of the assessment.Review of the medical record for Resident #269 revealed she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, atrial fibrillation, anxiety, depression, and hypertension Review of the MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #269 was cognitively intact and did not exhibit behaviors at the time of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 39 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and review of drug manufacturer instructions for use, the facility failed to ensure a resident was encouraged to use and offered an oral rinse after administration of an orally inhaled medication containing a steroid. This affected one (#263) of three residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 90.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #263 revealed he was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including emphysema, hypertension, viral hepatitis C, alcohol dependence, cocaine use, and toxic encephalopathy.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #263 was cognitively impaired and did not exhibit behaviors at the time of the assessment. Resident #263 utilized a walker and a wheelchair and required moderate assistance with activities of daily living, personal hygiene, bed mobility, and transfers.Review of physician orders for Resident #263 revealed the resident was ordered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on personnel record review, staff interview, review of policy, and review of the facility's Tuberculin (TB) Risk Assessment, the facility failed to ensure all new hire employees had current TB testing results in their employee files. This had the potential to affect all 80 residents. The facility census was 80. Findings include: Review of the facility's TB Risk assessment dated [DATE] revealed the facility had a TB screening program for all employees that required a baseline skin test with a two-step skin test for all healthcare workers. 1. Review of the personnel file for Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #460 revealed a hire date of 02/05/25. Further review of the personnel file for LPN #460 revealed no TB skin test results in the file. Interview on 09/09/25 at 4:50 P.M. ,with Human Resource Director (HRD) #410 verified there were no TB skin test results in the personnel file for LPN #460. 2. Review of the personnel file for Housekeeper #400 revealed a hire date of 09/11/24. Further review of the personnel…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, resident interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure treatments for pressure wounds were completed as physician ordered. This affected one (#52) of three residents reviewed for wound care. The facility census was 74. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #52 revealed admission date of 11/10/23. Diagnoses included quadriplegia, pressure ulcer of the left heel, stage four pressure ulcer of the sacral and pressure induced deep tissue damage of right the buttocks. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/31/25, revealed Resident #52 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. Further review revealed Resident #52 had bilateral impairment to the upper and lower extremities and was staff dependent on all activities of daily living (ADLs). Additionally, Resident #52 had two stage three pressure ulcers and five stage four pressure ulcers. Review of Resident #52's care plan, dated 01/27/25, revealed the resident had non-compliance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-11 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain the North and South shower rooms in a clean and sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect all residents except 24 (#3, #8, #9, #10, #15, #17, #18, #19, #20, #26, #27, #31, #33, #44, #47, #51, #52, #55, #56, #57, #58, #59, #62, and #70) residents identified as not using the shower rooms. The facility census was 70. Findings include: Observation on 07/10/24 beginning at 9:07 A.M., revealed there was a debris and a buildup of a dark colored substance around the perimeter of the shower floor tiles in both the North and South shower rooms. Interview on 07/10/24 at 9:11 A.M., with Housekeeping and Laundry Supervisor (HLS) #250 verified the dark colored substance on the floor tiles in both the North and South shower rooms. Review of the policy titled, Floors, last revised 2009, revealed floors would be maintained in a clean, safe, and sanitary manner. Review of the policy titled, Quality of Life-Homelike Environment, last revised 05/2017, revealed the facility would maintain a clean, sanitary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of controlled substance records, review of pharmacy receipts, resident and staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to timely obtain pharmacy services when resident medication was needed for administration. This affected one (#73) of three residents review for medications. The facility census was 70. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #73 revealed an admission date of 06/13/24 and a discharge date of 07/08/24. Diagnoses included type two diabetes mellitus, osteoarthritis of the knee, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #73 had intact cognition. Review of the hospital discharge medication orders revealed Resident #73 was ordered the narcotic pain medication oxycodone-acetaminophen 5-325 milligrams (mg) per tablet with instructions to take one tablet by mouth every eight hours as needed for pain for two days. Review of a pharmacy receipt…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility policies, the facility failed to ensure safe food handling occurred during meal service, failed to ensure the thermometer used to check food temperatures was sanitized between food items, and failed to ensure the high-temperature dishwasher washed and/or rinsed at the proper temperatures. This affected two residents (#9 and #70) who received a cheeseburger and the potential to affect all 82 residents residing in the facility. The facility identified all 82 residents in the facility received food from the kitchen. Findings include: 1. Observation prior to meal service on 04/30/24 at approximately 11:20 A.M. revealed [NAME] #553 was preparing to take food temperatures. [NAME] #553 removed a cloth soaking in a red sanitizer bucket and wrung it out and placed it on the counter near the steam table. [NAME] #553 then used the cloth to wipe the thermometer, placed the cloth back on the counter, and tested the temperature of mashed potatoes. [NAME] #553 then picked up the cloth and wiped off the thermometer and placed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-02 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and review of the menu portion spreadsheet, the facility failed to provide adequate protein portions for residents on a mechanical soft diet. This affected five (#15, #16, #22, #33, and #40) of six residents identified on a mechanical soft diet. The facility census was 82. Findings include: Review of the dietary menu spreadsheet for lunch on 04/30/24 revealed the portion for mechanical soft pork chop should have been six ounces. Observation during meal service on 04/30/24 beginning at 11:30 A.M. revealed [NAME] #553 used a size 20 scoop (equivalent to 1.52 ounces) to serve mechanical soft pork chops. Interview on 04/30/24 at 12:30 P.M. with [NAME] #553 confirmed some mechanical soft pork chop was leftover. [NAME] #553 stated it was because some residents on a mechanical soft diet chose the alternative menu option. [NAME] #553 confirmed he used the 20 scoop to serve mechanical soft pork to the residents on a mechanical soft diet. Interview and observation on 05/01/24 at 10:00 A.M. with Dietary Manager (DM) #569 confirmed the size 20 scoop held 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-02 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to provide clean resident rooms. This affected four (#21, #27, #55, and #59) of four residents reviewed for environment. The facility census was 82. Findings include: 1. Observation on 04/30/24 at 8:51 A.M. revealed Resident #27 sitting in their room wearing a shirt with food on it and the floor of room was dirty and sticky and an area of dry yellowish fluid was noted under Resident #27's bed. Interview on 04/30/24 at 8:55 A.M. with Occupational Therapy Assistant (OTA) #564 verified Resident #27 was sitting in their room wearing a shirt with food on it and the floor of the room was dirty and sticky and a dried yellowish fluid was noted under Resident #27's bed. 2. Observation on 04/30/24 at 9:26 A.M. revealed the floor of the resident room, shared by Residents #55 and #59, was dirty and sticky. Subsequent observation on 04/30/24 at 2:44 P.M. revealed the floor of the resident room, shared by Residents #55 and #59, continued to be dirty and sticky. Interview on 04/30/24 at 4:05 P.M. with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff and resident interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents had access to their call lights and their bed mobility equipment. This affected three (#12, #48, and #67) of three residents reviewed for accommodation of needs. The facility census was 82. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #12 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included early-onset cerebellar ataxia, type two diabetes mellitus without complications, and peripheral vascular disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/09/24, revealed Resident #12 was cognitively intact. Resident #12 was dependent on staff for shower/bathing, lower body extremity, personal hygiene, and always incontinent of bowel and bladder. Observation on 04/29/24 at 2:05 P.M. revealed Resident #12 was sitting in a wheelchair next to the bedside. Resident #12 reported she wanted to go back to bed. Resident #12's call light was observed to be under…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to consistently implement the bowel movement plan to administer medications as physician ordered for a resident not having a bowel movement for several days. This affected one (#7) of two residents reviewed for bowel incontinence. The facility census was 82. Findings include: Review of Resident #7's medical record revealed an admission date 10/03/23. Diagnoses included methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection, viral infection of urogenital system, and constipation. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/10/24, revealed Resident #7 had mild cognitive impairment and was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of Resident #7's plan of care dated 10/05/23 revealed Resident #7 was at risk for alteration in elimination to rule out incontinent of bowel and bladder. Interventions included administer medications as ordered. Review of Resident #7's Bowel and Bladder Elimination Record for April 2024 revealed no documented bowel movements for eight days from 04/02/24 to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and facility urinary continence and incontinence assessment and management policy, the facility failed to ensure a resident received timely incontinence care and services. This affected one (#67) of seven residents reviewed for bowel and bladder incontinence in a facility census of 82. Findings include: Review of Resident #67's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included type II diabetes mellitus, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, anemia, coronary artery disease, and depression. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] assessed Resident #67 had severe cognitive impairment, dependent on staff with activities of daily living, required partial to moderate assistance from staff with transferring and repositioning, utilized a wheelchair with partial to moderate assistance for mobility, and always incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of the nursing plan of care dated 03/26/24 revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-02 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, staff and resident interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to manage the resident's pain and administer pain medications as physician ordered. This affected one (Resident #287) of two residents reviewed for pain management. The facility census was 82. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #287 had an admission date of 04/24/24 with diagnosis of polyneuropathy (peripheral nerve pain). Review of the care plan initiated on 04/24/24 revealed Resident #287 was care planned for pain management with interventions of medications as ordered. Review of Resident #287's physician orders for 04/24/24 revealed an order for gabapentin (treats nerve pain) 300 milligrams (mg) three times daily. Review of the physician progress note dated 04/30/24 for Resident #287 revealed a medication adjustment for the gabapentin (used for nerve pain) to change the dose from original dose of 100 mg three times daily to 300 mg three times daily. Observation on 05/01/24 at 7:50 A.M. of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #610…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-02 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis facility regarding dialysis care and services for a resident. This affected one (Resident #287) of one resident reviewed for dialysis. The facility census was 82. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #287 revealed an admission date of 04/24/24 with diagnoses of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and dependence on dialysis. Review of the admission assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #287 revealed he was alert and oriented to person, place, time, and situation indicating he was cognitively intact. Review of the baseline care plan initiated on 04/24/24 for Resident #287 revealed he was care planned for dialysis. Review of the medical record for Resident #287 from 04/24/24 to 05/01/24 revealed there was no dialysis communication documentation. Interview on 05/01/24 at 4:43 P.M. with Registered Nurse (RN) #636 revealed the facility does not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-02 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the provider responded in a timely manner to pharmacy recommendations of an as needed psychotropic medications. This affected one (#7) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 82. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #7 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included major depressive disorder and generalized anxiety disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/10/24, revealed Resident #7 was cognitively intact. Review of Medication Regimen Review, dated 02/19/24, revealed the pharmacy review identified a psychotropic as needed (PRN) medication and identified the need for anticipated duration and continued use rationale. Resident #7 was prescribed Clonazepam tablet 0.5 milligram (mg) with instructions to take one tablet by mouth every twelve hours as needed. There was no physician response. Review of Medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-02 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, resident and staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered by the physician, within prescribed time frames, resulting in a medication error rate above five percent (%). A total of six medications errors were observed out of 40 opportunities for a medication administration error rate of 15.00%. This affected one (#4) of seven residents observed during medication administration. The facility census was 82. Findings include: Review of Resident #4's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure, anxiety, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic kidney disease, gastric esophageal reflux disease (GERD), and peripheral vascular disease (PVD). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] assessed Resident #4 had intact cognition and received antianxiety, antidepressant, anticoagulant, diuretic,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, resident and staff interview, review of the facility policy, and review of the manufacturer guidelines of insulin administration, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered to the residents without a significant medication error. This affected one (Resident #287) of seven residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 82. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #287 revealed an admission date of 04/24/24 with diagnoses of diabetes mellitus and long term insulin use. Review of the admission assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #287 revealed he was alert and oriented to person, place, time, and situation indicating he was cognitively intact. Review of the care plan initiated 04/25/24 revealed Resident #287 was care planned for diabetes with intervention to check blood sugar as ordered, resident has a dexcom continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) system. Review of the current physician orders from 04/2024 for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-02 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure medication entries were accurately documented and contained in the medical record. This affected two of seven residents (#4 and #287) reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 82. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #4's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure, anxiety, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic kidney disease, gastric esophageal reflux disease (GERD), and peripheral vascular disease (PVD). Review of Resident #4's physician's orders revealed the medications had the prescribed timeframes: 05/21/23 Cilostazol 100 milligrams (mg) given twice daily for intermittent claudication between 7:00 A.M. - 10:00 A.M. (rising) and 7:00 P.M.-10:00 P.M. (HS range), 05/21/23 Budesonide 0.5 mg per(/)2.0 milliliters (ml) inhalation vial given twice daily for COPD between…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, resident interview, police interview, review of Resident Council meeting minutes, and review of policies, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated in a dignified manner. This affected one (#61) of three residents reviewed resident rights. The facility census was 76. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #61 revealed an admission date of 02/05/24, diagnoses included major depressive disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, erectile dysfunction, paraplegia, type II diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, and autonomic dysreflexia. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #61 had moderate cognitive impairment, required moderate assistance for toilet hygiene, showering, dressing and personal hygiene and maximal assistance for transfers. Resident #61 planned to return home upon discharge. A Medicare 5-day MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #61 was independent with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, review of policy for incontinence, and review of staff correction form, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was dependent on staff for care, was provided incontinence care in a timely manner. This affected one (#10) of four residents reviewed for incontinence care. The census was 82. Findings included: Review of medical record for Resident #10 revealed admission date of 08/25/20, with a readmission date of 02/17/22. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, muscle weakness, cognitive communication deficit and unsteady feet. Review of the minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. The resident was assessed as the need for toileting as being dependent and for chair to bed or bed to chair transfer as dependent. Review of the care plan relative to the risk in decline for activity of daily living (ADL) function revealed interventions which included the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-31 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, policy review, and hospital documentation review, the facility failed to notify the physician to obtain orders and instructions to maintain and assess a resident chest tube drainage system. This affected one (#2) of one resident reviewed for chest tube care and treatment. The facility census was 79. Findings include: Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/25/23, with diagnoses including: malignant pleural effusion, right lung small cell carcinoma, sick sinus syndrome, morbid obesity, cardiomyopathies, pneumonia, abnormal coagulation profile, acute kidney failure, congestive heart failure, cutaneous abscess of abdominal wall, type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, atrial fibrillation, cardiac defibrillator, and prosthetic heart valve. Review of the hospital discharge documentation dated 08/25/23, lacked instructions or care related to the chest tube drainage system and chest tube dressing treatments. Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, policy review, and hospital documentation review, the facility failed to maintain and assess a resident chest tube drainage system. This affected one (#2) of one resident reviewed for chest tube care and treatment. The facility census was 79. Findings include: Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/25/23, with diagnoses including: malignant pleural effusion, right lung small cell carcinoma, sick sinus syndrome, morbid obesity, cardiomyopathies, pneumonia, abnormal coagulation profile, acute kidney failure, congestive heart failure, cutaneous abscess of abdominal wall, type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, atrial fibrillation, cardiac defibrillator, and prosthetic heart valve. Review of the hospital discharge documentation dated 08/25/23, lacked instructions or care related to the chest tube drainage system and chest tube dressing treatments. Review of the nursing admission assessment dated [DATE] between…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure fall prevention interventions were implemented as indicated. This affected one (#3) of four sampled residents reviewed for fall prevention and safety interventions. The facility census was 79. Findings include: Review of Resident #3's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/12/06, with diagnoses including: dementia, major depression, psychosis, abnormal posture, coronary artery disease, repeated falls, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney disease, anemia, anoxic brain damage, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. According to the most current minimum data set assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #3 was assessed with moderate cognitive impairment, ability to communicate clearly, dependent on staff for the completion of activities of daily living including bed mobility, utilized a wheelchair for mobility, incontinent of bowel and bladder with no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility policies, the facility failed to ensure medications were properly stored and not left at the resident bedside. This affected four (#4, #37, #40, and #278) of four residents reviewed for medication storage. The facility census was 74. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #37 had an admission date of 06/17/23. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), type two diabetes mellitus and glaucoma. There was no physician order that Resident #37 could self administer medications. Observation during medication administration on 07/19/23 at 8:42 A.M. revealed Resident #37 had an Incruse Ellipta inhaler (treats COPD), brimonidine tartrate ophthalmic solution 0.15% eye drops (treats glaucoma), Latanoprost ophthalmic emulsion 0.005% eye drops (treats glaucoma) and albuterol sulfate 0.083% inhalation solution (treats COPD) in the unlocked top drawer of Resident #37's bedside storage…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, staff and resident interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a resident was treated with dignity. This affected one (Resident #12) of two residents reviewed for dignity. The facility census was 74. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #12 revealed an admission date of 10/05/22. Diagnoses included obstructive uropathy and pressure ulcers to the sacral region, left hip, left buttock, and the left heel. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #12 was cognitively intact and required the extensive assistance of two staff for personal hygiene and toilet use, had a suprapubic catheter. Review of the care plan revealed Resident #12 was at risk for alteration in elimination due to suprapubic catheter. Interventions included to keep the urinary drainage bag below the level of the bladder, empty the urinary drainage bag each shift and as needed, and maintain dignity cover over…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-20 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure call lights were within the resident's reach. This affected two (#19 and #20) of two residents reviewed for accommodation of needs. The facility census was 74. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #20's medical record revealed Resident #20 had an admission date of 02/17/22. Diagnoses included schizoaffective disorder, dementia with mood disturbance, anxiety, major depressive disorder, obsessive compulsive disorder, convulsion, and bipolar disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #20 had impaired cognition and required the extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility, transfers, and toileting. Observation on 07/17/23 at 9:17 A.M. revealed Resident #20 was sitting up in bed and her call light paddle was clipped above her head on the top of the bed. The call light was not within reach for Resident #20. Interview on 07/17/23…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-20 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interview, resident interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided a clean homelike environment. This affected two resident (#12 and #17) of seven residents reviewed for a clean homelike environment. The facility census was 74. Findings include: 1. Observation and interview on 07/17/23 at 12:56 P.M. revealed Resident #12's tiled floor was sticky to the point shoes stuck to the floor. Resident #12 stated she was tired of the sticky floor and stated everyone talks about the floor being sticky but no one does anything about it. Interview on 07/18/23 at 2:16 P.M. with Housekeeping Supervisor #400 stated resident rooms were cleaned daily, including floors mopped. Upon entering Resident #12's room, Housekeeping Supervisor #400 verified the floor was sticky and contained several items of debris under the bed, over bed table and in the corner behind the room door. Review of the facility policy titled Cleaning and Disinfecting Residents' Rooms, dated August 2013, revealed housekeeping surfaces identified as floors…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who required extensive assistance from staff with personal hygiene was provided adequate nail care to ensure the nails remained trimmed and clean. This affected one (#23) of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility census was 74. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #23 had an admission date of 08/20/12. Diagnoses included type two diabetes mellitus, peripheral vascular disease, and atrial fibrillation. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #23 had intact cognition. Resident #23 required the extensive assistance of one staff for personal hygiene. Review of the nursing notes dated 07/01/23 through 07/19/23 revealed Resident #23 had not refused nail care. Observation and interview on 07/17/23 at 10:23 A.M. revealed Resident #23 had long fingernails. There was debris underneath the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, resident interview, observation, and review of the facility policies, the facility failed to provide the treatments for surgical wounds as ordered by the physician and recommendations from the hospital. This affected one (Resident #179) of one resident reviewed for wounds. The facility census was 74. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #179 revealed an admission date of 07/14/23. Diagnoses included surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm without rupture on 07/11/23. Review of the admission nursing assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #179 had been admitted from hospital and had a surgical incision midline above umbilicus, and bilateral groin surgical incisions. Review of the hospital's continuation of care discharge document dated 07/14/23 revealed orders for Resident #179's abdominal surgical site to be cleansed with normal saline, pat dry, apply collagen, and cover with foam or dry dressing every three days. The bilateral groin surgical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-20 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolatedProvide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, resident and staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to timely assist a resident with dental care needs who had a physician order to be seen by the dentist and was having signs and symptoms of dental pain and discomfort. This affected one (Resident #17) of two residents reviewed for dental. The facility census was 74. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #17 revealed an admission date of 09/03/21. Diagnoses included type II diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, sleep apnea, and major depressive disorder. Review of the care plan dated 09/17/21 with a revision date of 01/22/23 revealed Resident #17 had oral dental health problems related to missing and broken teeth. Interventions included diet as ordered, apply lip balm as needed, consult dietician if chewing swallowing problems are noted, coordinate arrangements for dental care, encourage the resident to wear dentures, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2020-03-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff serving food change gloves between tasks when plating meals. This had the potential to affect all 67 residents who receive food from the kitchen. The facility identified all residents, with the exception of Resident #13 and #271, to receive food from the kitchen. The facility census was 69. Findings include: Observation on 03/04/20 at 4:56 P.M. revealed [NAME] #430 wore disposable gloves while serving the dinner meal. [NAME] #430 placed the gloved right hand into an oven mitt, took food out of the oven, removed oven mitt with right hand, and kept the disposable gloves on. [NAME] #430 picked up a hamburger bun with the gloved right hand. [NAME] #430 touched the drawer handle to get a spatula and immediately afterwards picked up two cheese slices with the gloved hand. At no time during this observation did [NAME] #430 wash hands and put on new gloves. Interview on 03/04/20 at 5:01 P.M. with [NAME] #430 verified he/she did not hand wash or changed disposable gloves between…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2020-03-05 · tag F0800 — patternProvide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, review of the dietary spreadsheet, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide proper food portions for mechanically altered diets. This affected eight residents (#12, #18, #36, #37, #48, #60, 362, #369) who receive a mechanical soft diet. The facility census was 69. Findings include: Review of the dietary spreadsheet for dinner on 03/04/20 or the mechanical soft diets revealed the protein to be offered was three ounces of corned beef. Observation on 03/04/20 at 4:57 P.M. revealed dietary staff to be using a size 16 scoop, or two ounce portion, for the mechanical soft corned beef. Interview on 03/04/20 at 5:00 P.M. with Kitchen Manager #450 verified a two ounce scoop size was used for the mechanical soft corned beef. The facility identified eight residents (#12, #18, #36, #37, #48, #60, 362, and #369) who receive a mechanical soft diet.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-03-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow physician ordered isolation precautions for one (#16) of two residents reviewed for transmission-based precautions. The facility identified two residents with orders for transmission-based precaution. In addition, the facility failed to properly store a urine collection device in the bathroom shared by four residents (#5, #22, #36, #47). The facility census was 69. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #16 revealed an admission date of 12/03/09. Diagnoses included major depressive disorder; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD); benign prostatic hyperplasia without lower urinary tract symptoms; rheumatoid arthritis; obstructive and reflux uropathy, unspecified; and atherosclerotic heart disease. Review of a lab report dated 02/17/20 for Resident #16 revealed a white blood cell count (WBC) of 1.8. The lab report indicated a normal reference range for WBC to be between 4.00 to 11.00. Review of physician orders dated 02/18/20 for Resident #16 revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-03-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to treat residents in a dignified manner when assisting during meal time by standing over residents when assisting the resident to eat. This affected two (#35 and #36) out of eight residents that needed assistance with eating. The facility census was 69. Finding include: Observation on 03/02/20 at 12:27 P.M. revealed State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #410 assisting Resident #35 and Resident #36 eat lunch. STNA #410 alternated assisting Resident #35 and Resident #36 with eating spoonfuls of the meal, alternating between residents and standing over them. Resident #36 was sitting in a taller Broda chair and STNA #410 was nearly eye level with the resident. Resident #35 was sitting in a low wheelchair which was slightly reclined and STNA #410 was not at eye level. Observation on 03/02/20 at 12:30 P.M. revealed STNA #420 had began to assist Resident #36 with eating, offering spoonfuls of food to the resident. STNA #420 stood above the resident while assisting him with his meal. Interview on 03/02/20 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-03-05 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, review of the bathing record, resident interview, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to provide a shower or bath for one (#55) of one residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care. The facility census was 69. Findings include: Review of Resident #55's medical record revealed an initial admission date of 12/09/13 and re-entry date of 12/19/18. Diagnoses included unspecified acute appendicitis, type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chest pain, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, edema, major depressive disorder, and shortness of breath. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/23/20, revealed Resident #55 was cognitively intact. The assessment revealed Resident #55 required extensive assistance of one person with personal hygiene and physical help in part of bathing with one person physical assist. Interview on 03/02/20 at 2:35 P.M. with Resident #55 revealed the resident was scheduled to receive a shower on second shift Wednesdays and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-03-05 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, medical record review, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to provide a nutritional supplement as ordered by the physician. This affected one (#51) of three residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility identified 10 residents with physician orders for nutritional supplements. The census was 69. Findings include: Review of Resident #51's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/15/19. Diagnoses included end stage renal disease, hypertension, major depression, dementia without behavioral disturbances, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, anemia, and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder. Review of the most recently completed Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/14/20, revealed Resident #51 had severely impaired cognition and was prescribed a therapeutic diet with no nutritional concerns assessed. Review of a physician order dated 07/18/19 revealed Resident #51 was ordered a Magic Cup nutritional supplement to be provided daily at lunch. Review of Resident #51's weights obtained between September 2019 and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-03-05 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure insulin was held per physician's orders. This affected one (#53) of 20 residents who receive insulin. The facility census was 69. Findings include: Review of Resident #53's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/22/13. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, difficulty walking, anxiety, edema, chronic kidney disease, depressive disorder, heart failure, hypertension, diabetes, and dementia without behavioral disturbance. Review of Resident #53's monthly physician orders dated February 2020 revealed an order for Levemir insulin 42 units subcutaneously in the morning. Hold if blood sugar is less than 110. Review of Resident #53's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated February 2020 revealed on 02/07/20 the resident's blood sugar was 91 and insulin was administered. Again on 02/10/20 the resident's blood sugar was 78 and insulin was administered. Interview on 03/05/20 at 11:19 A.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) verified Resident #53 had received…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-03-05 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolatedEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, medical record review, review of a facility menu, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to provide therapeutic diets as ordered by the physician. This affected one (#51) of three residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility identified four residents with physician orders for high protein renal diets. The census was 69. Findings include: Review of Resident #51's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/15/19. Diagnoses included end stage renal disease, hypertension, major depression, dementia without behavioral disturbances, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, anemia, and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder. Review of the most recently completed Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #51 has severely impaired cognition and was prescribed a therapeutic diet with no nutritional concerns assessed. Review of a physician order dated 10/21/19 revealed Resident #51 was ordered a high protein renal diet with regular texture. Review of a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-05-02 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespreadEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of personnel files, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure state tested nurse aides (STNAs) received twelve hours of annual training and had annual performance reviews. This had the potential to affect all 82 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: 1. Review of the personnel file for STNA #571 revealed a hire date of 04/07/22. Review of annual training the last employment year revealed from April 2023 to April 2024, STNA #571 had three trainings including over the phone survey education, fall intervention policy, and all staff training (no topics identified). No amount of time was documented on the trainings. STNA #571 did not have an annual performance evaluation. 2. Review of the personnel file for STNA #624 revealed a hire date of 02/18/19. Review of the annual training revealed in 2023, STNA #571 had three trainings including clinicomex (medical record) training, state education, and infection control. No amount of time was documented on the trainings. STNA #624 did not have an annual performance evaluation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2023-07-20 · tag F0917 — patternMake sure each resident has 1) at least one window to the outside in a room; 2) a room at or above ground level; 3) adequate bedding; 4) furniture that meets the resident's needs; or 5) adequate closet space.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure an adequate supply of bed linens including pillowcases, bariatric sheets, and bed pads were provided to residents. This affected four (Resident #3, #28, #32, and #176) of four residents reviewed for linens. The facility census was 74. Findings include: Interview and observation on 07/19/23 at 9:20 A.M. with State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #255 revealed when first shift staff arrived in the morning, there were never enough clean pillowcases, bed pads, or bariatric fitted sheets available. STNA #255 reported the residents had to go without bedding changes or could not go to bed sometimes due to no linens. STNA #255 also reported the residents would sometimes have to use pillows with no pillowcases. STNA #255 reported there were enough linens, but the linens weren't washed in time for first shift staff to have access to them. Observations with STNA #255 revealed there were no clean pillowcases, bed pads, or bariatric fitted sheets in either of the two storage closets designated for storage of clean…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to AYDEN HEALTHCARE — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 1.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
The other 10 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.1★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUCKEYE FAMILY TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 51% | since 12/31/2025 |
| KAPLAN, YISROEL | Individual | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 12/31/2021 |
| ASCHENDORF, JONATHAN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2023 |
| BRICKMAN, KRISTOPHER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/01/2024 |
| DRAKE, MELISSA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/21/2025 |
| LAHASKY, EPHRAM | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 12/31/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 77% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $963K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365453. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-05-02, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.