Ayden Healthcare Of Piqua
275 Kienle Drive, Piqua, OH 45356 · For profit - Corporation · 99 certified beds · (937) 773-9346 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jan 2024
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 2 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (41) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $19,890 in federal fines (most recent 2023-10-27)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 0.4% | 5.3% | 15.4% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.9% | 6.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.4% | 0.4% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 19.6% | 30.1% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.9% | 3.2% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 0.7% | 6.1% | 16.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 29.4% | 25.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 94.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.3% | 3.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 19.9% | 21.4% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 6.1% | 8.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.1% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 87.3% | 75.6% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 26.1% | 24.9% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 8.4% | 12.9% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.91 | 1.73 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.04 | 1.80 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
42.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 52 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 58.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 51 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.36 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 60% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 42.9%CMS range 29.4–56.5 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.5%CMS range 5.7–15.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 58.8% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 49.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 56.9% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.8% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.8%CMS range 4.5–14.5 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.42 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 83.2 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.04 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.31 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.66 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.72 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.17 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.38 to 0.13 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
41 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 29 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2023-10-27 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, physician and staff interviews, review of the facility policies and information from the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel, the facility failed to accurately and timely assess a resident's nutritional status with decreased meal intakes, abnormal laboratory values, and two new in-house acquired unstageable pressure ulcers (slough and/or eschar: Known but not stageable due to coverage of wound bed by slough and/or eschar). Additionally, the facility failed to provide a diet to meet the resident's estimated energy and protein needs. Actual Harm occurred to Resident #05 when the facility was providing less calories and protein than the resident's estimated energy and protein needs resulting in the resident losing 4.7 percent weight loss in one month and the two unstageable pressure ulcers deteriorating. This affected one (Resident #05) of three residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 76. Findings include: Closed medical record review for Resident #05 revealed an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2022-09-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide routine oral care to a dependent resident who received tube feedings. This resulted in actual harm when Resident #27, who was dependent on staff for all aspects of care, displayed multiple areas of the lower gums that were observed to be bleeding and swollen with areas of dark brown holes on the teeth extending halfway up the teeth. Resident #27's teeth were observed to have significant yellow and gray build up on both the upper and lower natural teeth, that were yellowish gray in color. Resident #27's tongue was observed to be dry and pale pink in color. Resident #27's both upper and lower lips were discolored (a deep maroon color) with dry flaky skin. This affected one (#27) of one resident reviewed for gastronomy tube management. The facility identified two residents with a gastronomy tube. The facility census was 72. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #27 revealed an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure food was stored and prepared in a sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect all of the residents residing in the facility with the exception of one facility-identified resident (#79) who had a diet order for nothing by mouth. The facility census was 76 residents. Findings include: 1. Observation on 06/23/25 at 8:03 A.M. revealed employee drinks were stored on dry stock shelves and on top of a box of straws. Interview 06/23/25 at 8:03 A.M. with Dietary Supervisor (DS) #208 confirmed employee personal items should be stored in a way to prevent contamination and should not be stored with the residents' food items or supplies. 2. Observation on 06/23/25 at 8:04 A.M. of the dish machine revealed that it reached 155 degrees Fahrenheit (F) for the wash cycle and 174 degrees F for the final rinse. Interview with DS #208 on 06/23/25 at 8:06 A.M. confirmed the temperature for the wash cycle was 155 degrees F and the temperature for the final rinse was 174 degrees. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure members of the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) were present at care conferences and failed to conduct care conferences as required. This affected five (Residents 16, #24, #28, #38, and #70) of five residents reviewed for care conferences. The facility census was 76 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #24 revealed an admission date of 03/17/25 with diagnoses including acute kidney failure, hypertension, dehydration, morbid obesity, and congestive heart failure. Review of the care conference summary for Resident #24 dated 03/20/25 revealed the participants included the resident and Social Service Director (SSD) #215. There were no other IDT members present. Interview on 06/24/25 03:20 P.M with SSD #215 confirmed she was the only IDT member present at Resident #24's admission care conference on 03/20/25. 5. Review of the medical record for Resident #16 revealed an admission date of 05/14/25 with diagnoses including cellulitis to left lower…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual, the facility failed to ensure accurate coding of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. This affected one (Resident #54) of two residents reviewed for dental/oral status. The facility census was 76 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #54 revealed an admission date of 11/01/23 with diagnoses including right hemiparesis, dysphagia, hypertension, seizure disorder, and diabetes mellitus. Review of a dental note for Resident #54 dated 03/20/24 revealed the resident was seen by the dentist and 10 teeth were extracted. The note indicated the resident's remaining teeth would need to be extracted and the physician clearance form was left at the facility. Review of the annual MDS assessment for Resident #54 dated 11/07/24 revealed the resident was edentulous. Review of a dental assessment for Resident #54 dated 02/05/25 revealed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) evaluations were accurate and updated. This affected one (Resident #2) of the two residents reviewed for PASARR evaluations. The facility census was 76 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #2 revealed an admission date of 03/11/21 with diagnoses including anxiety disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), psychotic disorder with delusions, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, and type two diabetes mellitus. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #2 dated 05/07/25 revealed the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. Review of the PASARR for Resident #2 dated 03/11/21 revealed the resident had no diagnoses of mental disorders listed in section-D (indication of serious mental Illness). A box was checked no for having any of the mental disorders listed which included schizophrenia, mood disorder, delusional (paranoid) disorder, panic or other severe anxiety disorder,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to develop accurate person-centered comprehensive care plans. This affected one (Resident #54) of two residents reviewed for dental/oral status. The facility census was 76 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #54 revealed an admission date of 11/01/23 with diagnoses including right hemiparesis, dysphagia, hypertension, seizures, and diabetes mellitus. Review of the person-centered comprehensive care plan for Resident #54 dated 11/13/23 revealed the resident was at risk for oral/dental problems related to being edentulous. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #54 dated 11/07/24 revealed the resident was edentulous. Review of a dental assessment for Resident #54 dated 02/05/25 revealed the resident had some teeth in all four quadrants. Review of the MDS assessment for Resident #54 dated 04/20/25 revealed the resident had severely…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to provide cares/services to dependent residents to maintain adequate personal hygiene. This affected one (Resident #6) of the three residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). The facility census was 76 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #6 revealed an admission date of 01/11/19 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, schizoaffective disorder-bipolar type, and depression. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #6 dated 05/12/25 for the resident had severely impaired cognition and required moderate staff assistance with personal hygiene. Observation on 06/23/25 at 1:46 P.M. of Resident #6 revealed the resident had gray facial hair on her chin. Interview on 06/23/25 at 1:47 P.M. with Resident #6 confirmed she had gray facial hair on her chin and sometimes staff removed her facial hair, but they had not done so in a long time. Observation on 06/24/25 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to schedule timely ophthalmology appointments for residents. This affected one (Resident #28) of 21 residents sampled. The facility census was 76 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record review for Resident #28 revealed an admission date of 01/14/23 with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infraction, major depressive disorder, and type two diabetes mellitus. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #28 dated 05/22/25 revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Review of the progress note for Resident #28 dated 06/04/25 revealed the resident was examined by the facility eye doctor who gave a referral to an ophthalmologist for cataract surgery. Review of the medical record for Resident #28 dated 06/04/25 to 06/25/25 revealed it did not include documentation regarding scheduling the resident for a consultation with an ophthalmologist. Interview on 06/25/25 at 11:55 A.M. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #326 confirmed she was responsible for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of the facility policy, and review of online resources per the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the facility failed to administer antibiotic medications with appropriate indication for use. This affected one (Resident #13) of seven residents reviewed for medications. The facility census was 76 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #13 revealed an admission date of 09/26/24 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, type two diabetes, and major depressive disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #13 dated 04/03/25 revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired. Review of physician's orders for Resident #13 revealed an order dated 09/27/24 for an antibiotic, nitrofurantoin oral capsule 50 milligrams (mg), give one capsule by mouth with meals one time a day for urinary tract infection (UTI) prevention. Review of a pharmacy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of manufacturer guidelines, the facility failed to ensure staff primed insulin pen devices prior to insulin administration resulting in significant medication errors. This affected one (Resident #46) of the three residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 76 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #46 revealed an admission date of 07/13/21 with diagnoses including type two diabetes mellitus, major depressive disorder, hypertension, obstructive sleep apnea, and morbid obesity. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #46 revealed an order dated 12/11/24 for insulin lispro with meals an order dated 02/06/25 for Lantus insulin in the morning. Observation on 06/25/25 at 7:55 A.M. of medication administration for Resident #46 per Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #345 revealed the nurse attached a new needle to a Lantus insulin pen and dialed the dose to 52 units and administered the injection to the resident. LPN #345 then attached a new needle to a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored properly. This affected one (Resident #37) of the five residents observed for medication storage. The facility census was 76 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #37 revealed admission date of 10/24/24 with diagnoses including systemic lupus erythematosus, major depressive disorder, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia and rheumatoid arthritis. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #37 dated 03/31/25 revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required staff set-up with activities of daily living (ADLs.) Observation on 06/25/25 at 3:20 P.M. of Resident #37's room revealed the resident was seated in her chair with the bedside table directly in front of her. On the bedside table there was a bottle of over the counter (OTC) vitamins with a letter M written in black marker on the lid. Interview on 06/25/25 at 3:22 P.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #207 confirmed there…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 29 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation, resident representative interview, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to provide routine dental services. This affected one (Resident #54) of two residents reviewed for dental services. The facility census was 76 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #54 revealed an admission date of 11/01/23 with diagnoses including right hemiparesis, dysphagia, hypertension, seizure disorder, and diabetes mellitus. Review of the dental note for Resident #54 dated 03/20/24 revealed the resident was seen by the dentist and had 10 teeth extracted. Further review revealed Resident #54's remaining teeth would need to be extracted, and physician clearance was left at the facility. Review of the dental note for Resident #54 dated 09/30/24 revealed the dentist was in the facility but the resident was not seen because the planned services were unable to be completed in the resident's room. Review of the dental assessment for Resident #54 dated 02/05/25 revealed the resident had some teeth in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, observation, review of online resources from Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide adequate infection control techniques during a resident's dressing change. This affected one (#20) resident of the three residents reviewed for infection control. The facility also failed to ensure staff properly discarded personal protective equipment (PPE) after completing a resident's dressing change who was in Enhanced Based Precautions (EBP). This had the potential to affect the 19 other residents (#01, #02, #03, #04, #05, #06, #07, #08, #09, #10, #11, #12, #13, #14, #15, #16, #17, #18, and #19) housed on the 100-hall who the facility identified as not being in EBP. The facility census was 80. Findings included: Review of record revealed Resident #20 had admission date on 03/17/25. Diagnoses included orthopedic aftercare from surgical amputation left leg below knee, acute osteomyelitis in left ankle and foot, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical records, observation, staff interviews, review of employee training records, review of employee personnel files, review of manufacturer guidelines for a sit-to-stand lift, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to safely transfer a resident using a sit-to-stand lift. This affected one (#30) resident of the three residents reviewed for transfers. The facility identified three residents were dependent on staff for transfers. The facility census was 80. Findings included: Review of the medical record for Resident #30 revealed an admission date 11/25/24. Diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy, muscle weakness, unsteadiness on feet, type two diabetes, and multiple fractures of ribs. Review of Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #30 was severely cognitively impaired as evidence by a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 02. Resident #30 was dependent on staff for transfers and required substantial to maximal assistance for other activities of daily…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interview, review of the Certification and Licensure System (CALS), staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to report an allegation of inappropriate staff touching as potential resident abuse to the Ohio Department of Health (ODH). This affected one resident (#38) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 83. Findings include: Review of Resident #38's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/17/24. Diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure, morbid (severe) obesity and Type II diabetes. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed Resident #38 was cognitively intact, required set-up assistance with eating and oral hygiene, partial staff assistance with bed mobility and transfers, and substantial staff assistance with toileting hygiene, bathing, dressing, personal hygiene, and wheelchair mobility. Review of the physician orders revealed an order dated 02/22/25 for No Male Care for showers…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-18 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, review of the Certification and Licensure System (CALS), medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to investigate an allegation of inappropriate staff touching as potential resident abuse. This affected one resident (#38) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 83. Findings include: Review of Resident #38's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/17/24. Diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure, morbid (severe) obesity and Type II diabetes. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed Resident #38 was cognitively intact, required set-up assistance with eating and oral hygiene, partial staff assistance with bed mobility and transfers, and substantial staff assistance with toileting hygiene, bathing, dressing, personal hygiene, and wheelchair mobility. Review of the physician orders revealed an order dated 02/22/25 for No Male Care for showers every shift for Post traumatic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0711 — isolatedEnsure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to have physician visits and nurse practitioner visits notes signed in a timely manner. This affected three (#06, #34, and #60) of three residents reviewed for provider visits. The facility census was 84. Findings include: 1. Medical record review for Resident #06 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included myocardial infarction, diabetes mellitus, pulmonary embolism, essential primary hypertension, hyperlipidemia, respiratory failure, obstructive sleep apnea, major depressive disorder, pleural effusion chronic kidney disease, hernia, and morbid obesity. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/10/25, revealed Resident #06 was cognitively intact. Review of the progress notes for Resident #06 revealed he was assessed by the facility physician on 02/11/25; however, the document was not signed until 02/15/25. Further review revealed Resident #06 was assessed by Nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, staff interviews and review of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines, the facility failed to ensure staff followed proper infection control procedures during incontinence care. This affected one (#16) out of three residents review for infection control. The facility census was 82. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #16 revealed admission date of 11/01/22. Diagnoses include chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and congestive heart failure (CHF). The resident remained in the facility. Review of Resident #16's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of eight out of 15 indicating impaired cognition. Resident #16 required set up for eating, maximum assistance with bed, transfers and was dependent for toileting hygiene. Resident #16 was frequently incontinent of bladder and always incontinent of bowel. Observation was made on 12/18/24 at 10:58…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility infection control records, observations, staff interviews, review of electronic mail (e-mail) correspondence, review of facility policies and procedures, review of the Center for Disease Control and Prevention CDC) guidance, and review of Ohio Department of Health's (ODH) guidance for reporting infectious diseases, the facility failed to develop and implement effective infection control policies and practices which includes a failure to ensure cleaning schedules for ice buckets were developed/implemented, failure to ensure storage areas were maintained in a sanitary manner to potentially prevent rodent/animal contamination, failure to ensure the handwashing sink in the kitchen was appropriately functioning, failure to develop written policies and procedures which included when and to who potentially communicable diseases should be reported, and failure to ensure the local health department was notified in a timely manner of a Campylobacter illness outbreak. This affected a total of nine (Resident #10, #32, #43, #45, #48, #54, #61, #65 and #66) residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-29 · tag F0559 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff and resident interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to notify residents of room changes. This affected two (#35 and #49) out of the three residents reviewed for room changes. The facility census was 71. Findings included: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #35 revealed an admission date of 03/01/23 with medical diagnoses of Coal worker's pneumonoconiosis, Parkinson's disease, atherosclerotic heart disease (ASHD), and atrial fibrillation. Review of the medical record for Resident #35 revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], which indicated Resident #35 had moderate cognitive impairment and required substantial/maximum staff assistance with toileting hygiene, bathing, and bed mobility and was dependent for transfers. Review of the medical record for Resident #35 revealed Resident #35 moved rooms on 11/28/23. Review of the medical record revealed no documentation to support Resident #35 was notified or approved of the room change.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-29 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interviews, review of the facility Self-Reported Incidents (SRI), and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from resident-to-resident sexual abuse. This affected two (#11 and #62) out of the three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 71. Findings included: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #62 revealed an admission date of 01/07/22 with medical diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, legal blindness, hypertension, and adult failure to thrive. Review of the medical record for Resident #62 revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], which indicated Resident #62 had moderate cognitive impairment and required supervision with eating and substantial staff assistance with toilet hygiene, bed mobility, transfers, and bathing. Review of the medical record for Resident #62 revealed a Social Service note dated 01/11/24 at 2:07 P.M. which stated an attempt was made to contact the resident's power of attorney (POA) to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-29 · tag F0742 — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide adequate behavioral supervision for Resident #35, in accordance with the residents physician orders. This affected one (#35) out of three reviewed for sexual behaviors. The facility census was 71. Findings included: Review of the medical record for Resident #35 revealed an admission date of 03/01/23 with medical diagnoses of Coal worker's pneumonoconiosis, Parkinson's disease, atherosclerotic heart disease (ASHD), and atrial fibrillation. Review of the medical record for Resident #35 revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], which indicated Resident #35 had moderate cognitive impairment and required substantial/maximum staff assistance with toileting hygiene, bathing, and bed mobility and was dependent for transfers. Review of the medical record for Resident #35 revealed a nurse's note dated 01/11/24 at 12:13 P.M. which stated the nurse was notified that Resident #35 was observed being…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident and staff interview, self-reported incident review, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to report all allegations of abuse to the administrator and other officials in a timely manner. This affected two (#3 and #4) of six residents reviewed for abuse. The census was 75. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #3 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #3 include chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, anxiety, chronic respiratory failure, and heart failure. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition and required a two-person assist for activities of daily living (ADLs). Further review revealed the resident received hospice services and was on supplemental oxygen. Interview on 09/14/23 at 11:09 A.M., with Resident #2 stated she was not in the room on 07/13/23 when the alleged abuse from the Administrator towards Resident #3…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-18 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolatedAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure Administration administered the facility in a manner to maintain the highest psychosocial well-being of the residents. This affected three (#2, #4, and #5) of six residents reviewed for psychosocial well-being. The census was 75. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #2 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] as a readmission. Diagnoses for Resident #2 included aftercare following joint replacement surgery, muscle weakness, depression, and chronic kidney disease. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition and required a one-person assist for activities of daily living (ADLs). Interview on 09/14/23 at 11:09 A.M., with Resident #2 stated she reported the Administrator being inappropriate with a therapy worker, stopping the therapist in the hall, staring at her chest, and interrupting her therapy session. Resident #2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-09-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance, the facility failed to follow infection control standards to prevent the spread of COVID-19, by not having staff wear appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE). This had the ability to affect all the residents of the facility. The census was 72. Findings include: Observation of staff members upon entrance to the facility on [DATE] at 8:05 A.M., revealed no staff members were wearing eye protection. Tour of the facility on 08/29/22 at 9:20 A.M., revealed multiple working in the facility were currently not wearing any eye protection. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #84 on 08/29/22 at 9:25 A.M., confirmed she was not wearing any eye protection while caring for residents. LPN #84 stated she was told she was not required to wear any due to county COVID-19 level. Interview with LPN #66 on 08/2922 at 9:29 A.M., confirmed she was not wearing any eye protection. LPN #66 stated eye…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure walk in freezer was sanitary and free of water leaking onto stored food and drinks. This had the potential to affect 67 of 72 residents residing in the facility who receive their meals from the kitchen. The facility identified five (#19, #65, #27, #34 and #26) residents who receive no food from the kitchen. The facility census was 72. Findings include Observation on 08/29/22 at 9:15 A.M., of the walk-in freezer revealed a gray dish pan collecting water dripping from the freezer unit on the tip shelf of a storage unit. Water was dripping into the pan from a copper-colored line coming from the unit. The freezer unit had approximately three inches of ice formation on the underneath side of the unit. Directly under the gray dishpan was individually frozen juice cups that were sitting in a cardboard box that was wet from the leaking water. All other boxes in the walk in freezer were coated with a think layer of ice. The ceiling of the walk-in freezer had collections of clear liquid hanging in droplet shapes that were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-09-07 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the medical record contained the advanced directive information. This affected one (#319) of one resident reviewed for advanced directives. The facility census was 72. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #319 revealed admission date of 08/19/22, with diagnoses including orthopedic aftercare, right femur fracture, congestive heart failure, type two Diabetes Mellitus, depression and anxiety. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition and required extensive two person assistance bed mobility, transfers, toileting and supervision for eating. Review of the care plan updated 08/31/22, revealed Resident #319 choose to be a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) Comfort Care Arrest (CCA). Review of physician orders for Resident #319 revealed a full code order was place on 08/19/22 and discontinued on 8/25/22. A DNR - no directions specified for order was placed on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-09-07 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, and review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) website, the facility failed to issue an Advanced Beneficiary Notice (ABN) as required. This affected two (#15 and #11) of three residents reviewed. The facility census was 72. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #15 revealed a re-admission date of 07/08/22, with diagnoses including stroke and hemiplegia/paresis affecting left non dominant side, Diabetes Mellitus type two and depression. Review of records for Resident #15 revealed a Notice of Medicare Non Coverage (NOMNC) was issued with an end of service date of 03/10/22 and signed by Resident #15 on 03/08/22. No Advanced Beneficiary Notice (ABN) was provided. Review of medical record for Resident #11 revealed admission date of 03/11/21, with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type two diabetes mellitus, depression and hypertension. Review of records for Resident #11 revealed a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) was issued with an end of service of 07/22/22 and Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-09-07 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to issue bed hold notification to a resident. This affected one (#34) of seven reviewed for hospitalization. The census was 72. Findings include: Review of Resident #34's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/04/22. Diagnoses listed included hypertension, hypothyroidism, chronic kidney disease, type two diabetes mellitus, and vascular dementia. Resident #34 was assessed as being moderately cognitively impaired and requiring extensive assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) in a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE]. Further review revealed Resident #34 was transferred to a local hospital for evaluation on 07/20/22. There was no documentation of a bed hold notice being issued Resident #34 or her representative. Interview on 08/31/22 art 9:48 A.M., with Business Office Manager (BOM) #17 confirmed that Resident #34 was not issued a bed hold notice when discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. BOM #17 stated Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-09-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident and staff interviews, and review of policy, then facility failed to assess and monitor a resident's bruising. This affected one (#30) of four residents reviewed for non-pressure related skin concerns. The census was 72. Findings include: Review of Resident #30's medical record revealed an admission date of 05/10/22. Diagnoses listed included type two diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, major depressive disorder, emphysema, kidney failure, and age-related osteoporosis. Resident #30 was assessed as being cognitively intact and requiring limited assistance with personal hygiene in a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE]. Observation on 08/29/22 at 11:15 A.M., revealed bruising to Resident #30's bilateral hands, wrists, and lower forearms. Interview on 08/31/22 at 1:29 P.M., with Resident #30 stated the bruising to her hands, wrists, and forearms was from past blood draws. Further review of Resident #30's medical record revealed no documentation an any…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-09-07 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a palm protector was applied as ordered. This affected one (#27) of three residents reviewed for limited range of motion and supportive devices. The facility census was 72. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #27 revealed an admission date on 12/08/20, with diagnoses including: stroke, gastronomy malfunction, hypertension, dementia, disturbances of salivary secretions, glaucoma, flaccid hemiplegia, type two diabetes, and contracture of left hand. Review of comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #27 revealed severely impaired cognition. Resident #27 required total assist for bed mobility, transfers, eating and toileting. Resident #27 has functional limitation of range of motion on one side. Review of the plan of care for Resident #27 dated 08/03/17 revealed the resident has activity of self-care deficit as evidenced by inability to care for self-related to physical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record reviews, resident and staff interviews, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to ensure medications were securely stored. This affected two (#39 and #72) of two resident reviewed for medications. The facility census was 72. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #39 revealed admission date of 05/15/20, with diagnoses including: stroke with dominant right side hemiplegia/paresis, depression and polyneuropathy. The resident remains in the facility. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed the resident had intact cognition and required supervision for all activities of daily living. Review of physician orders for August 2022, revealed Resident #39 had an order for Gabapentin (polyneuropathy) 300 milligram capsule three times daily. Observation on 08/29/22 at 10:11 A.M., revealed one capsule in a clear, unmarked medicine cup on Resident #39's bedside table. Interview on 08/29/22 at 10:13 A.M., with Licensed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-09-07 · tag F0800 — isolatedProvide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and physician, dietitian and staff interviews, the facility failed to assess a resident for personal food preferences and provide a diet to meet the nutritional needs. This affected one (#319) of one resident reviewed reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 72. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #319 revealed admission date of 08/19/22, with diagnoses including: orthopedic aftercare, right femur fracture, congestive heart failure, type two Diabetes Mellitus, depression and anxiety. The resident remains in the facility. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition and required extensive two person assistance bed mobility, transfers, toileting and supervision for eating. Review of a care plan updated 08/31/22 revealed Resident #319 was a potential for alteration in nutrition/hydration with interventions to provide diet as ordered. Diabetes Mellitus with interventions to monitor and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-09-07 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation and Nurse Practitioner and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain accurate medical records. This affected one resident (#29) of 79 residents records reviewed during the annual recertification. The facility census was 72. Findings included Medical record review for Resident # 29 revealed an admission date on 12/01/18, with diagnoses including: type two Diabetes Mellitus with chronic kidney failure, bipolar disorder, above the right knee amputation, morbid obesity, anxiety disorder and hypertensive heart disease. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #29 dated 07/14/22 revealed an impaired cognition. Resident #29 required extensive assist for bed mobility, dressing and toileting with two staff members, resident was supervised for eating. No dialysis was coded. Review of the plan of care for Resident #29 dated 06/23/17 was silent for dialysis treatment. Review of the active physician orders for Resident #29 for the month of September 2020 was silent for orders related to the treatment of dialysis,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-10-10 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of Self-Reported Incidents (SRI), and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to follow and implement the facility's abuse policy to ensure residents were protected from potential sexual abuse from other residents. This affected two (Resident #13 and Resident #20) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 59. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #13's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included cerebrovascular disease, weakness, diabetes, vascular dementia without behaviors, hypertension, and muscle weakness. Review of the baseline care plan dated 06/13/19 revealed the Director of Nursing (DON) completed the care plan and documented Resident #13 had impaired cognition related to dementia. Review of the care plan dated 06/14/19 revealed Resident #13 had impaired thought processes characterized by deficit in memory, judgement, decision making related to vascular dementia.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of Self-Reported Incidents (SRI), and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to report incidents of potential resident to resident sexual abuse. This affected two (Resident #13 and Resident #20) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 59. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #13's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included cerebrovascular disease, weakness, diabetes, vascular dementia without behaviors, hypertension, and muscle weakness. Review of the baseline care plan dated 06/13/19 revealed the Director of Nursing (DON) completed the care plan and documented Resident #13 had impaired cognition related to dementia. Review of the care plan dated 06/14/19 revealed Resident #13 had impaired thought processes characterized by deficit in memory, judgement, decision making related to vascular dementia. Interventions for the focus included the resident needs supervision…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-10 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of Self-Reported Incidents (SRI), and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to investigate incidents of potential resident to resident sexual abuse. This affected two (Resident #13 and Resident #20) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 59. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #13's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included cerebrovascular disease, weakness, diabetes, vascular dementia without behaviors, hypertension, and muscle weakness. Review of the baseline care plan dated 06/13/19 revealed the Director of Nursing (DON) completed the care plan and documented Resident #13 had impaired cognition related to dementia. Review of the care plan dated 06/14/19 revealed Resident #13 had impaired thought processes characterized by deficit in memory, judgement, decision making related to vascular dementia. Interventions for the focus included the resident needs…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-10 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurately coded. This affected three (Resident #6, #24, and #51) of fifteen residents reviewed for MDS accuracy. The facility census was 59. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #6's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/23/18. Medical diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, insomnia, dementia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, peripheral vascular disease, pain left shoulder, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, and atherosclerotic heart disease of coronary artery. Review of the resident's physician's orders revealed an order dated 04/30/19 for tramadol (opioid) three times daily for pain. Review of the resident's 07/13/19 quarterly MDS, revealed she received no pain medication during the assessment period. Review of section N, medications, revealed she received opioid medications seven of seven days of the assessment period. Interview with MDS Nurse #477…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-10-10 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record reviews, staff interview, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to ensure timely treatment of a resident's urinary tract infection. This affected one (Resident #35) of two residents reviewed for urinary tract infections. The facility census was 59. Findings include: Review of Resident #35's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/08/19. Medical diagnoses included encounter for orthopedic aftercare following surgical amputation, diabetes mellitus, polyneuropathy, heart failure, epilepsy, anxiety, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the resident's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a brief interview for mental status score of 10, indicating moderate impairment in cognition. The resident required extensive assistance for toilet use and personal hygiene. She was frequently incontinent of urine. Review of the resident's physician's orders revealed an order dated 09/28/19 for urinalysis (UA) with culture and sensitivity…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-10-10 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interviews, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to ensure timely physician response to pharmacy recommendations. This affected two (Resident #6 and #5) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 59. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #6's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/23/18. Medical diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, insomnia, dementia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, peripheral vascular disease, pain left shoulder, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, and atherosclerotic heart disease of coronary artery. Review of the resident's pharmacy recommendations revealed a recommendation written 04/17/19 for the resident's ferrous sulfate 325 milligrams (mg) twice daily. The recommendation indicated doses above 325 mg daily were not absorbed and contraindicated in geriatric resident's due to constipation. The physician did not respond to the recommendation until 05/10/19, and agreed with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$19,890 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $19,890 — penalty dated 2023-10-27
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to AYDEN HEALTHCARE — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.1 | -1.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 1.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
The other 10 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.1★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUCKEYE FAMILY TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | 51% | since 12/31/2025 |
| KATZ, GEORGE | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 25% | since 02/01/2025 |
| KAZARNOVSKY, SOLOMON | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 12% | since 02/01/2025 |
| STEIN, ABBA | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 12% | since 02/01/2025 |
| LAHASKY, EPHRAM | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 02/01/2025 |
| CUSNER, ADAM | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/27/2025 |
| DEGYANSKY, JEFFREY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2020 |
| GOLDISH, ELIEZER | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 25 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365607. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.