Ayden Healthcare Of Rosemount Pavilion
20 Easter Drive, Portsmouth, OH 45662 · For profit - Corporation · 117 certified beds · (740) 354-4505 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Aug 2023
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (42) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- about 20% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 1.4% | 5.3% | 15.4% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.1% | 6.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.6% | 0.2% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.4% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 19.4% | 30.1% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.5% | 3.2% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 1.2% | 6.1% | 16.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 35.7% | 25.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 94.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.0% | 3.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 17.6% | 21.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 2.3% | 8.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.0% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 75.6% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 31.2% | 24.9% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 10.9% | 12.9% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.99 | 1.73 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.19 | 1.80 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
43.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 78 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 65.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 29 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.56 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 85% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 43.0%CMS range 32.2–53.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 13.3%CMS range 9.8–18.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 65.5% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 41.4% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 55.2% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 2.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 5.9% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.2%CMS range 4.0–13.6 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.22 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 117 beds and averages 75.7 residents a day — about 65% occupied, or roughly 41 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.15 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.41 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.60 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.84 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.28 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.47 to 0.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
42 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 31 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2021-08-18 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy for administering medication, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors when physician orders for a blood pressure medication were not followed and the medication was not administered to a resident. This affected one (Resident #281) of three residents reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 84. Actual harm occurred when Resident #281 was admitted to the facility from the hospital on [DATE] with orders for a blood pressure medication that was not administered resulting in elevated blood pressure and requiring the resident's treatment at the hospital. Findings include: Review of the medical record of Resident #281 revealed the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, essential hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and insomnia. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessment dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure treatment orders for a resident with a pressure ulcer were implemented timely and appropriately. This affected one resident (#79) of the six residents the facility identified as having pressure ulcers. The facility census was 81. Findings include: Record review for Resident #79 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses which included open wound of the right knee, atrial fibrillation, and anxiety disorder. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/22/26, revealed the resident was assessed to have intact cognition. Review of the care plan, revised 04/02/26, revealed the resident had an alteration in skin. Interventions included to administer treatments as ordered. Review of the Wound Assessment Report, dated 04/20/26 and signed by Nurse Practitioner (NP) #501, revealed Resident #79 was assessed to have Moisture Associated Skin Dermatitis (MASD) to the coccyx. Treatment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-05 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, record reviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure incontinence care was provided in a timely manner. This affected one resident (#79) out of the three residents reviewed for incontinence care and toileting assistance. The facility census was 81. Findings include:Record review for Resident #79 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses which included open wound of the right knee, atrial fibrillation, and anxiety disorder. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/22/26, revealed the resident was assessed to have intact cognition. The resident was assessed to always be incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of the care plan, revised 04/02/26, revealed the resident has/at risk for bladder incontinence. Interventions included to apply barrier cream as ordered and to provide peri-care after each incontinent episode. Observation on 05/05/26 at 9:16 A.M. revealed the call light for Resident #79…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure infection control measures were appropriately implemented during wound care treatment. This affected one resident (#72) observed for wound care. The facility census was 81. Findings include:Record review for Reisdent #72 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses which included colostomy hemorrhage, type two diabetes mellitus, and atrial fibrillation. Review of the 5-Day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/11/26, revealed the resident was assessed to have intact cognition and to have a surgical wound present with surgical wound care provided. Observation on 05/04/26 at 1:45 P.M. revealed Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) #117 entered the room of Resident #72 to provide wound care treatment to the residents abdominal wounds. ADON #117 performed hand hygiene and donned (put on) two pairs of gloves, one on top of the other. ADON #117 removed the old (dirty)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive, resident centered care plans were developed and implemented. This affected seven residents (#39, #48, #69, #74, #76, #78, and #233) out of the 20 residents whose comprehensive care plans were reviewed during the annual survey. The facility census was 78. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #39 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses include pressure ulcer of the right heel, morbid obesity, and diabetes mellitus. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/20/25, revealed the resident was assessed to have intact cognition. The resident was assessed to have one stage three pressure ulcer which was present upon admission to the facility. Review of the active physicians orders for Resident #39 revealed orders for a specialty mattress to bed, house protein supplement two times a day, encourage to float heels, and resident to wear Prevalon boots…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-16 · tag F0699 — patternProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) was appropriately assessed to identify the cause of the residents PTSD and minimize triggers and/or re-traumatization. This affected five residents (#36, #48, #69, #74, and #78) out of five residents identified by the facility as having PTSD/trauma. The facility census was 78. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #36 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including diabetes mellitis type II, cataracts, benign neoplasm of the chorioid, hypertensive retinopathy, dementia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, neuropathy, contractures, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, congestive heart failure, cerebral infarction, dysphagia, aphagia, epilepsy, post-traumatic stress disorder(08/23/21), chronic pain, atrial fibrillation, anxiety, and muscle weakness. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/03/25, revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-16 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, the facility failed to provide Resident #233 with a dignity bag for the indwelling foley catheter. This effected one (Resident #233) of three residents reviewed for indwelling foley catheter. The facility census was 78. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #233 revealed an admission date of 04/30/25 with diagnoses including complete amputation of right leg between the right hip and knee, complications of amputation stump, pressure ulcer of sacral area stage four, diabetes mellitus type two, hypotension, and sebhorrheic dermatitis. Review of the physician orders dated 05/25 revealed Resident #233 had an order for foley catheter care every shift. The physician orders did not include size of foley catheter or when to change it. Review of the Medicare five day admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #233 had cognitive impairment with inattention, disorganized thinking, delusions, and other behavioral symptoms…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-16 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments accurately reflected pressure relieving devices and mechanically altered diets. This affected three residents (#20, #39, and #233) out of the 20 residents whose MDS assessments were reviewed during the annual survey. The facility census was 78. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #39 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses include pressure ulcer of the right heel, morbid obesity, and diabetes mellitus. Review of the quarterly MDS assessment, dated 04/20/25, revealed the resident was assessed to have intact cognition. The resident was assessed to have one stage three pressure ulcer which was present upon admission to the facility. The resident was assessed to not have pressure reducing devices in place to the bed or chair. Review of the facility Equipment Purchase/Rental List revealed a specialty mattress had been obtained for Resident #39 on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions on resident care plans were reviewed and revised to ensure accuracy. This affected one resident (#48) out of the two residents whose care plans were reviewed for fall interventions during the annual survey. The facility census was 78. Findings include: Record review for Resident #48 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses which included Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), insomnia, and Parkinson's disease. Review of the quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/11/24, revealed the resident was assessed to be cognitively intact. Review of the care plan, dated 01/14/21, revealed the resident was at risk for falls and potential injury. Interventions included a commode or urinal at bedside. Observation on 05/12/25 at 3:30 P.M. revealed Resident #48 was lying in bed. No commode or urinal were present at the residents bedside. Interview with Licensed Practical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure wound care treatments were provided as ordered by the physician. This affected one resident (#15) out of the two residents who were reviewed for non-pressure skin conditions during the annual survey. The facility census was 78. Findings include: Record review for Resident #15 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses which included diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney failure, and pruritis (itching). Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/07/25, revealed the resident was assessed to have intact cognition. Review of the care plan, most recently revised on 05/12/25, revealed the resident had eczematous areas all over body and skin tears to right wrist and top of forehead. Interventions included treatments as ordered. Review of the active physician order, dated 05/01/25, revealed an order to cleanse left shoulder with soap and water, pat dry,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the physician order for pressure ulcer care contained sufficient information to provide adequate care. This effected one resident (Resident #233) of four reviewed for pressure ulcer care. The facility census was 78. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #233 revealed an admission date of 04/30/25 with diagnoses including complete amputation of right leg between the right hip and knee, complications of amputation stump, pressure ulcer of sacral area stage four, diabetes mellitus type two, hypotension, and sebhorrheic dermatitis. Review of the Medicare five day admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #233 had cognitive impairment with inattention, disorganized thinking, delusions, and other behavioral symptoms directed towards others. Resident #233 had no impaired range of motion to bilateral upper extremities or bilateral lower extremities and used a wheelchair for mobility. Resident #233 was dependent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 31 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure smoking assessments were accurately completed for residents who smoked at the facility. This affected one resident (#39) out of the two residents reviewed for safe smoking practices during the annual survey. The facility identified 11 residents who were smokers. The facility census was 78. Findings include: Record review for Resident #39 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses include pressure ulcer of the right heel, morbid obesity, and diabetes mellitus. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/20/25, revealed the resident was assessed to have intact cognition. Review of the care plan, initiated on 10/20/24, revealed the resident was at risk for injury related to smoking. Interventions included supervision at all times for smoking and smoking items to be kept at the nurses station. Review of the facility Smoking and Safety assessments,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-16 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure resident meals were as ordered by the physician. This effected one (Resident #20) of two residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 78. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #20 revealed an admission date of 08/04/19 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, hypertension, protein calorie malnutrition, bipolar disorder, dementia, anxiety and hyperlipidemia. Review of a physician order dated 10/13/24 revealed Resident #20 was to receive a fortified foods diet, regular texture and thin liquids. Resident #20 also received a house supplement three times daily. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #20 was cognitively impaired with continuous inattention, disorganized thinking, had delusions and hallucinations and physical/verbal/other behavioral symptoms towards others. Resident #20 had impaired range of motion to bilateral lower extremities and was dependent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-16 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure Resident #20 family concerns of being overmedicated were timely and appropriately assessed. This effected one of one residents reviewed for opioid medication side effects. The facility census was 78. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #20 revealed an admission date of 08/04/19 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, hypertension, protein calorie malnutrition, bipolar disorder, dementia, anxiety and hyperlipidemia. Review of the physician orders dated 05/25 revealed Resident #20 was ordered the following medications: Tylenol eight hour extended release 650 milligrams (mg) by mouth every eight hours as needed for pain, tramadol hydrochloride 50 mg by mouth two times daily for pain, and attempt non pharmacological interventions as resident allows such as reposition for comfort, massage, diversion/guided imagery, music and relaxation techniques. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-16 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and medical record review the facility failed to ensure blood pressure medications were held per the physician parameters. This effected one (Resident #69) of one reviewed for significant medication errors. The facility census was 78. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #69 revealed an admission date of 03/03/25 with diagnoses including unspecified fracture of left lower extremity, generalized anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation, diabetes mellitus type two, and hypertension. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #69 was cognitively intact with no mood symptoms or behaviors. Resident #69 had impaired range of motion to bilateral lower extremities. Resident #69 required substantial-maximum assistance from staff to complete activities of daily living. Resident #69 was incontinent of bowel and bladder. Resident #69 did not have any pain, falls or skin impairment. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-16 · tag F0773 — isolatedProvide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure laboratory testing was performed as ordered by the physician. This affected one resident (#39) out of the five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications during the annual survey. The facility census was 78. Findings include: Record review for Resident #39 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses include pressure ulcer of the right heel, morbid obesity, and diabetes mellitus. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/20/25, revealed the resident was assessed to have intact cognition. Review of the active physicians order, dated 12/10/24, revealed the resident was to have a Complete Blood Count (CBC) with differential, and Basic Metabolic Panel (BMP), and a Hemoglobin(Hgb) A1C level drawn and resulted every three months in January, April, July, and October. Review of the laboratory results for Resident #39 from 10/11/24 through 05/14/25 revealed no CBC, BMP, or HgbA1C…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure indwelling foley catheter drainage bags were off the floor. This effected two residents (Resident #76 and #233) of three residents reviewed for indwelling foley catheters. The facility census was 78. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #76 revealed an admission date of 02/11/25 with diagnoses including dysarthria, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, transient ischemic attack (TIA), cirrhosis of liver, benign prostate hypertrophy (BPH), insomnia, viral Hepatitis B, hypertension and major depression. Review of the physician orders dated 05/25 revealed Resident #76 was ordered the following medications and treatments: 16 French indwelling foley catheter with 10 milliliter (ml) balloon to catheter bag drainage system related to neurogenic bladder, change indwelling foley catheter monthly and as needed, monitor urinary output related to foley catheter every shift, irrigate bladder three times per week with normal saline and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-10 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and record review the facility failed to give residents the correct form when they were cut from therapy services and stayed in the facility. This affected two (Resident #12 and #35) of three residents reviewed for beneficiary notices. The facility census was 74. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #12 revealed an admission date of 09/19/22 and she was cut from therapy services on 07/03/23 and stayed in the facility and her pay source was Medicare part A. The resident had pertinent diagnoses including: stroke, hypertension and diabetes. Review of beneficiary notice date 06/29/23 revealed Resident #12 was being cut from therapy services on 07/03/23 and she did not receive CMS form 10055 that gives them the option to appeal, pay for it themselves, or agree to cut services. Interview with the Administrator on 08/09/23 at 2:00 P.M. verified there was no CMS form 10055 for Resident #12 given. 2. Record review of Resident #35 revealed an admission date of 04/18/23 and he was cut from therapy services on 05/04/23 and stayed in the facility and his pay…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record reviews, review of facility Self Reported Incident (SRI), review of facility investigation, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to prevent staff to resident abuse. This affected one resident (#14) out of the three residents reviewed for abuse during the annual survey. The facility census was 74. Findings include: Record review for Resident #14 revealed this resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including unspecified convulsions, osteomyelitis, unspecified dementia, Alzheimer's disease, bipolar disorder, and altered mental status. Review of the significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/24/23, revealed this resident was rarely/never understood. This resident was assessed to require extensive assistance from two staff members for bed mobility, transfers, and toileting and to require supervision with one person physical assistance for eating. Review of the facility SRI form, dated 07/03/23, revealed on 06/08/23 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record reviews, review of facility Self Reported Incident (SRI), review of facility investigation, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure timely reporting of an allegation of abuse. This affected one resident (#14) out of the three residents reviewed for abuse during the annual survey. The facility census was 74. Findings include: Record review for Resident #14 revealed this resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including unspecified convulsions, osteomyelitis, unspecified dementia, Alzheimer's disease, bipolar disorder, and altered mental status. Review of the significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/24/23, revealed this resident was rarely/never understood. This resident was assessed to require extensive assistance from two staff members for bed mobility, transfers, and toileting and to require supervision with one person physical assistance for eating. Review of the facility SRI form, dated 07/03/23, revealed on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-10 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record reviews, review of facility Self Reported Incident (SRI), review of facility investigation, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a timely and thorough investigation was completed following an allegation of abuse. This affected one resident (#14) out of the three residents reviewed for abuse during the annual survey. The facility census was 74. Findings include: Record review for Resident #14 revealed this resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including unspecified convulsions, osteomyelitis, unspecified dementia, Alzheimer's disease, bipolar disorder, and altered mental status. Review of the significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/24/23, revealed this resident was rarely/never understood. This resident was assessed to require extensive assistance from two staff members for bed mobility, transfers, and toileting and to require supervision with one person physical assistance for eating. Review of the facility SRI…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-10 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a new Pre-admission Screen and Resident Review (PASARR) was completed following a new diagnosis of psychosis. This affected one resident (#16) out of the three residents reviewed for PASARR's during the annual survey. The facility census was 74. Findings include: Record review for Resident #16 revealed this resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including Parkinson's disease, osteoarthritis, anxiety disorder, and difficulty walking. A new diagnosis of unspecified psychosis was added for the resident on 01/20/23. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/20/23, revealed this resident had mildly impaired cognition evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment score of 12 out of 15. This resident was assessed to require extensive assistance from two staff members for bed mobility, transfers, and toileting. Further record review for this resident revealed no evidence of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, observation, and record review the facility failed to have a care plan for Resident #30's skin condition and failed to have an accurate care plan for Resident #47's dialysis port site. This affected two of 17 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 74. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident # 30 revealed an admission date of 06/09/23 with pertinent diagnoses of: non pressure chronic ulcer of skin, anxiety disorder, hypertension, and cellulitis of abdominal wall. Review of the 06/16/23 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident was cognitively intact and was at risk for pressure ulcers and had two arterial or venous ulcers. The MDS triggered in section V for a skin/pressure ulcer care plan to be out in place. Review of the medical record on 08/09/23 revealed the resident had a wound to her abdominal area since admission. Review of the medical record on 08/09/23 revealed there was no care plan for pressure ulcer or skin alterations developed. Interview on 08/10/23 at 10:15 A.M. with the Administrator verified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-10 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record reviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure appropriate pain management was provided for a residents complaints of pain. This affected one resident (#14) out of the two residents reviewed for pain management during the annual survey. The facility census was 74. Findings include: Record review for Resident #14 revealed this resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including unspecified convulsions, osteomyelitis, unspecified dementia, Alzheimer's disease, bipolar disorder, and altered mental status. Review of the significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/24/23, revealed this resident was rarely/never understood. This resident was assessed to require extensive assistance from two staff members for bed mobility, transfers, and toileting and to require supervision with one person physical assistance for eating. This resident was assessed to exhibit nonverbal indicators of pain daily over past 5 days. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-10 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, observation, resident interview, and record review the facility failed to provide dialysis care with professional standards when they failed to document checks of the dialysis port. This affected one (Resident #47) of one resident who was receiving dialysis services. The facility census was 74. Findings include: Record review of Resident # 47 revealed an admission date of 01/10/23 with pertinent diagnoses of: end stage renal disease, type two diabetes mellitus, morbid obesity, lymphedema, atrial fibrillation and hypertension. Review of the 07/07/23 quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident was moderately cognitively impaired and was receiving dialysis services. Review of the care plan dated 01/11/23 revealed Resident #47 has renal failure related to end stage disease and the goal is the resident will be free from infection through the review date. Review of Resident #47's medical record on 08/10/23 revealed there was no documented evidence that the dialysis site was checked for infection, bleeding, bruit or thrill, or patency.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record reviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure pain levels and interventions for pain were monitored and documented when pain medication was administered. This affected two residents (#14 and #18) out of the two residents reviewed for pain management during the annual survey. The facility census was 74. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #14 revealed this resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including unspecified convulsions, osteomyelitis, unspecified dementia, Alzheimer's disease, bipolar disorder, and altered mental status. Review of the significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/24/23, revealed this resident was rarely/never understood. This resident was assessed to require extensive assistance from two staff members for bed mobility, transfers, and toileting and to require supervision with one person physical assistance for eating. Review of the care plan, dated 04/25/23, revealed this resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to provide an appropriate diagnosis for the use of an antipsychotic medication. This affected two residents (Resident #34 and Resident #74) out of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 74. 1. Record Review of Resident #34 on 08/09/23 at 07:41 A.M. revealed this resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following medical diagnoses: acute kidney failure, Schizoaffective disorder, osteomyelitis, left femur fracture, abdominal wall abscess, chronic ulcers, congestive heart failure, adult failure to thrive, Alzheimer's disease, anxiety, depression, and dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed on 05/02/23 revealed this resident has severe cognitive impairment. Review of physician orders revealed this resident is receiving the following medication: Seroquel 25 milligrams (mg) 1 tablet by mouth daily at bedtime for agitation. Review of current resident diagnoses revealed this resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-08-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, resident interview, and observation the facility failed to ensure residents received necessary care and treatment for application of hand protectors and hospice services. This affected two of 22 sampled residents (Residents #56 and #66). Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #66's medical record revealed she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: dysphagia, muscle weakness, abnormal posture, essential hypertension, hemiplegia right side, cerebrovascular disease, and cerebral edema. Review of Resident # 66's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the following. Resident #66's speech was clear, she makes herself understood, she understands others, her cognition was intact, and she had minimal depression. Resident #66 had verbal and other behavioral symptoms not directed toward others one to three days during the assessment period, that did not impact the resident or other residents, and she did not reject care. Resident #66 required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-08-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, policy review, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure medications were stored appropriately when the facility had numerous expired medications and undated insulin. This affected three Residents (#8, #59, and #67) and affected two of four medication carts observed for med storage. The facility census was 84. Findings include: Observation on 08/12/21 at 10:43 A.M. of the 100 hall medication cart revealed the following expired over the counter medications: cetrizine 10 milligrams (mgs) expired 07/21, Vitamin B-12 100 micrograms expired 07/21, and multi vitamin with iron expired 12/20. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #408 on 08/12/21 at 10:43 A.M. verified the medications were all expired and should have been discarded and not used. Observation on 08/12/21 at 10:54 A.M. of the 400 hall medication cart revealed Resident #67 insulin Lispro vial was not marked when opened and was received from pharmacy on 03/01/21. Resident #8 Lantus insulin vial was not marked when opened and was received from pharmacy on 05/25/21. Resident #59 had a Basaglar…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-08-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, review of facility policy for Notices of Transmission Based Precautions, Wound Care, and review of the Center for Disease Center guidance on Respirators on/Respirators off, the facility failed to ensure infection control safety measures were followed for residents who were in quarantine for COVID-19 and being an unvaccinated new admission, resident on contact isolation, and for residents during a wound dressing change. This affected five residents (Resident #9, #19, #274, #275, and #285) of the 22 residents reviewed during this annual survey. The facility census was 84. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #19 revealed an admission date of 12/26/18. Diagnoses included pressure ulcer to the coccyx, muscle weakness, and hemiplegia affecting unspecified side. Review of Resident #19's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 07/17/21, revealed the resident's cognition was not assessed. No behaviors were noted. Resident #19 was noted to require extensive assistance from two staff members…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-08-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure resident bathroom floors were clean. This affected three (Residents #278, #279 and #284) of three residents reviewed for environment. The facility census was 84. Findings include: 1. Observation on 08/10/21 at 8:58 A.M. revealed built-up dust and additional unidentified debris on the floor in the corners and the floor was visibly dirty inside Residents #284 and #279's bathroom. Interview on 08/10/21 at 8:58 A.M., Resident #279 stated the housekeeping staff mop his room most days but they do not sweep. Resident #279 further stated the dust and unidentified debris in the corners had been that way since he admitted last month (07/21/21). Observation on 08/16/21 at 11:03 A.M. revealed built-up dust and additional unidentified debris remained on the floor in the corners and dirty floor inside Resident #284 and #279's bathroom. Interview on 08/16/21 at 11:09 A.M., Housekeeping Assistant (HA) #350 stated all resident rooms are cleaned daily. HA #350 verified there was dust and unidentified debris…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-08-18 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review the facility failed to notify the ombudsman when residents were admitted to the hospital. This affected one (Resident #9) of three reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 84. Findings include: Record review of Resident #9 revealed an admission date of 06/27/18 with pertinent diagnoses of: chronic respiratory failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dementia, cerebrovascular disease, seizures, hypertension, arteriosclerotic heart disease, type two diabetes mellitus, major depressive disorder, dysphagia, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following non-traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage, benign prostatic hyperplasia, glaucoma, chronic kidney disease, and insomnia. Review of the 07/23/21 quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed Resident #9 was moderately cognitively impaired and required total dependence for bed mobility, eating, bathing, and toilet use. The Resident was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. Record review of Progress Notes dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-18 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) the facility failed to ensure resident assessments were completed accurately in the areas of nutrition, skin integrity, and opiod use. This affected three (Residents #40, #41, and #279) of 22 residents reviewed for assessments. The facility census was 84. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #40 revealed an admission date of 12/16/20. Diagnoses included unspecified displaced fracture of surgical neck of left humerus, 4-part fracture of surgical neck of left humerus, non-displaced fracture of right tibial spine, essential hypertension, unspecified dementia, and hypokalemia. Review of the quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severely impaired cognition. Resident #40 weighed 99 pounds. Review of Resident #40's weights revealed, on 07/08/21, Resident #40 weighed 100.4 pounds. On 06/01/21, Resident #40 weighed 98.8 pounds. On 05/04/21, Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-08-18 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to complete a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) (a screen to check for a serious mental illness prior to admission into a facility) for residents with a qualifying diagnosis of bipolar disorder and failed to include a qualifying diagnosis when completing a level one PASRR for a resident. This affected two (Residents #59 and #63) of the two residents reviewed for PASRRs. The facility census was 84. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #59 revealed an admission date of 06/08/21. Diagnosis included bipolar disorder with current episode depression, heart failure, and hypertension. Review of Resident #59's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment completed on 07/09/21 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating an intact cognition for daily decision making ability. Resident #59 was noted to express feeling down, depressed or hopeless, have trouble falling asleep, or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and medical record review the facility failed develop comprehensive care plans for residents in the areas of refusal of treatment, smoking, and activities. This affected two (Resident #71 and #279) of 22 sampled resident's whose care plans were reviewed. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #71's medical record revealed she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: hypertensive urgency, asthma, chronic pain, osteoarthritis, pleural effusion, insomnia, dementia without behaviors, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, constipation, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of Resident #71's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the following. Resident #71's speech was clear, she made herself understood, she understands others, and her cognition was moderately impaired. Resident #71 had moderately severe depression, she had no psychosis, did not refuse care, and had no behaviors. It was somewhat important for Resident #71 to have reading material,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-08-18 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and observation, the facility failed to identify a resident's need for an audiology consult who was experiencing signs of being hard of hearing. This affected one (Resident #27) of one resident reviewed for vision/hearing needs. The facility census is 84. Findings included: Review of the medical record for Resident #27 revealed an initial admission date of 12/28/20 and a re-entry date of 03/29/21. Diagnoses included acquired absence of the left leg below the knee, hypothyroidism, and anxiety disorder. Review of Resident #27's quarterly Minimum Date Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 indicating a moderately impaired cognition for daily decision making ability. Resident #27 was noted to require extensive assistance from one staff member for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene. Resident #27 was noted to have adequate hearing with no assistive devices. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-08-18 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, medical record review, resident interview, and observation the facility failed to provide an ongoing activities program that was of interest to the resident. This affected one (Resident #71) two sampled residents reviewed for activities. Findings include: Review of Resident #71's medical record revealed she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: hypertensive urgency, asthma, chronic pain, osteoarthritis, pleural effusion, insomnia, dementia without behaviors, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, constipation, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of Resident #71's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the following. Resident #71's speech was clear, she made herself understood, she understands others, and her cognition was moderately impaired. Resident #71 had moderately severe depression, she had no psychosis, did not refuse care, and had no behaviors. It was somewhat important for Resident #71 to have reading material, to listen to music she liked, not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-18 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, resident interview, and medical record review the facility failed to ensure residents received the nutritional interventions to maintain body weight and to ensure nutritionally adequate diets were provided. This affected two of four sampled residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident #71 and #41). Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #71's medical record revealed she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: hypertensive urgency, asthma, chronic pain, osteoarthritis, pleural effusion, insomnia, dementia without behaviors, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, constipation, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of Resident #71's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the following. Resident # 71's speech was clear, she made herself understood, she understands others, and her cognition was moderately impaired. Resident #71 had moderately severe depression, she had no psychosis, did not refuse care, and had no behaviors. Resident #71 required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-08-18 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure oxygen tubing was changed per the physician's order. This affected one (Resident #41) of one residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility identified nine residents who receive respiratory treatments. The facility census was 84. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #41 revealed an admission date of 07/01/21. Diagnoses included heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, unspecified cirrhosis of liver, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, chronic atrial fibrillation, and end stage renal disease. Review of the quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition. The resident required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility, transfers, and toileting. Review of the physician orders revealed orders dated 07/02/21 for oxygen via nasal cannula at 3 liters per…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-18 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure residents who received antipsychotic medication had an adequate indication for use and had target behaviors identified. This affected one of five sampled residents and one resident reviewed for hospice (Resident #56 and #63). Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #63's medical record revealed she was admitted on [DATE] with osteoarthritis of knee, dementia with behavioral disturbance, generalized anxiety, and schizoaffective disorder bipolar disorder. Review of Resident #63's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the following. Resident #63 did not have a serious mental illness and/or intellectual disability. Resident #63 received an antipsychotic medication. Review of Resident #63's physician orders revealed an antidepressant medication (Zoloft) 50 milligrams (mg) daily, an antianxiety medication (Ativan) 0.5 mg once daily at bed time, and antipsychotic medication (Seroquel) 25 mg twice daily. Review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-08-18 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, observation and record review the facility failed to ensure medications error rates were less than 5% when they administered the wrong medication and wrong dosage amount for Resident #47. The facility had 29 medication administration opportunities with two errors for a medication error rate of 6.9%. The facility census was 84. Findings include: Record review of Resident #47 revealed an admission date of 09/11/15 with pertinent diagnoses of: type two diabetes mellitus, hypothyroidism, schizoaffective disorder, dementia, vitamin D deficiency, and gastro-esophageal reflux disease. Review of Resident #47's Physician Orders on 08/11/21 revealed an order dated 02/09/21 for heartburn relief 10 mg tablet give two tablets orally one time a day for gastro-esophageal reflux disease. Review of Resident #47's Physician Orders on 08/11/21 revealed an order dated 01/26/21 for Vitamin D3 2000 unit tablet give one tablet orally one time a day for supplement. Observation of a medication pass on 08/11/21 at 9:15 A.M. with Registered Nurse (RN) #835 revealed she administered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-08-18 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on menu review, resident interview, staff interview, and medical record review the facility failed to have a vegetarian menu prepared in advance. This affected one of four sampled residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident #71). Findings include: Review of Resident #71's medical record revealed she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: hypertensive urgency, asthma, chronic pain, osteoarthritis, pleural effusion, insomnia, dementia without behaviors, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, constipation, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of Resident #71's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the following. Resident #71's speech was clear, she made herself understood, she understands others, and her cognition was moderately impaired. Resident #71 had moderately severe depression, she had no psychosis, did not refuse care, and had no behaviors. Resident #71 required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility, did not transfer, walk, or use locomotion, supervision of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to AYDEN HEALTHCARE — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 1.9 | +1.1 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
The other 10 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.1★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KAZARNOVSKY, SOLOMON | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 50% | since 12/31/2021 |
| STEIN, ABBA | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 50% | since 12/31/2021 |
| CUSNER, ADAM | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/27/2025 |
| DEGYANSKY, JEFFREY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2020 |
| GOLDISH, ELIEZER | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/09/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 20% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365584. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-16, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.