No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Ayden Healthcare Of Waterville

8885 Browning Drive, Waterville, OH 43566 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 99 certified beds · (419) 878-8523 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Aug 2023Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0744)2 immediate-jeopardy citations$75,286 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Aug 2023
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (42) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $75,286 in federal fines (most recent 2023-08-25)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
1222 Pray Blvd. · (419) 441-4252 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1197 Farnsworth Rd · (419) 878-8518 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
9533 Waterville Swanton Rd · (419) 878-7691 · Call to confirm hours
Park
8505 S River Rd · (419) 779-6052 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1440 Waterville Monclova Rd · (419) 699-8548

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased7.4%5.3%15.4%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.8%6.2%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.8%0.4%2.0%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms11.1%30.1%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%3.2%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened8.8%6.1%16.1%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication38.1%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine93.4%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.6%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control23.1%21.4%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table11.0%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.1%75.6%79.4%better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 30 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

50.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.26U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.09hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.14hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 38% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF50.5%CMS range 37.8–64.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.8%CMS range 6.8–15.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.7%CMS range 3.4–12.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.061.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.38
RN hours/ resident / day
1.23
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.86
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.47
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.23
RN hoursweekends
44.9%
Total nursing turnover
33.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 75.4 residents a day — about 76% occupied, or roughly 24 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.47 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.38 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.86 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.17 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.60 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.44 to 0.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

13
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-19)
9
at the previous standard inspection (2024-03-13)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

42 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 30 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2023-08-25 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of hospital records, review of a facility Self-Reported Incident (SRI), review of the facility abuse investigation, review of the coroner's report, staff interviews, review of the facility policy titled Freedom from Abuse Neglect, and Exploitation, review of facility policy titled Abuse, Mistreatment, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation of Resident Property, and review of facility policy titled Resident to Resident Altercations, the facility failed to ensure Resident #100 and Resident #101, were free from abuse. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and serious life-threating injuries and/or death for Resident #101 when after witnessing a verbal altercation between Resident #100 and Resident #101, during which time Resident #101 had exhibited physical aggression, State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #230 was unable to obtain assistance from additional staff and left the two residents unsupervised in their room while she went to notify the nurses of the situation. Upon…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-08-25 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of emergency department medical records, review of hospital medical records, staff interviews, physician interview, physician assistant (PA) interview, review of the facility policy titled Food and Nutrition Services, and review of the facility policy titled Resident Hydration and Prevention of Dehydration, the facility failed to ensure adequate hydration was provided to a resident, failed to provide an assessment of a resident refusing food and fluids, and failed to notify the physician and Dietetic Technician, Registered (DTR)/Registered Dietitian (RD) of a resident's refusal of food and fluids for three days. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and the potential for serious life-threatening harm, injuries, and/or death for Resident #6 who had refused foods and fluids on 08/07/23, 08/08/23, 08/09/23 and 08/10/23 with no assessment of the resident being completed and no notification to the facility DTR #320/RD or the resident's physician for additional interventions.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident and staff interview, record review and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity while receiving feeding assistance. This affected one (#112) of three residents reviewed for dignity. The facility census was 68.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #112 revealed an admission date of 08/03/16 and a readmission date of 10/09/24, with diagnoses of Parkinsonism, paranoid schizophrenia, anxiety, dementia, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/30/26, revealed Resident #112 had impaired cognition and was dependent on staff for eating. Review of the care plan initiated 11/06/24 and revised on 04/20/26 revealed Resident #112 was at risk for decline in activities of daily living (ADL) function and/or ADL participation as evidenced by a need for total (assistance) with ADLs, transfers, ambulation, and toileting related to requiring staff assistance for ADLs. Further review revealed Resident #112 had contractures of the hands and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide timely repositioning for dependent residents. This affected two (#112 and #113) of three residents reviewed for repositioning. The facility census was 68.Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #112 revealed an admission date of 08/03/16 and a readmission date of 10/09/24, with diagnoses of Parkinsonism, paranoid schizophrenia, anxiety, dementia, and need for assistance with personal care.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/30/26, revealed Resident #112 had impaired cognition and was dependent on staff for eating, repositioning and toileting hygiene. Further review revealed Resident #112 was always incontinent of bladder and bowel.Review of the care plan initiated 11/06/24, and revised on 04/20/26, revealed Resident #112 was at risk for decline in activities of daily living (ADL) function and/or ADL participation as evidenced by need for total (assistance) with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-14 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview and policy review the facility failed to provide timely incontinence care. This affected two (#112 and #113) of three residents reviewed for incontinence care. The facility census was 68.Findings include: 1.Review of the medical record for Resident #112 revealed an admission date of 08/03/16 and a readmission date of 10/09/24, with diagnoses of Parkinsonism, paranoid schizophrenia, anxiety, dementia, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/30/26, revealed Resident #112 had impaired cognition and was dependent on staff for eating, repositioning and toileting hygiene. Further review revealed Resident #112 was always incontinent of bladder and bowel. Review of the care plan initiated 11/06/24 and revised on 04/20/26 revealed Resident #112 was at risk for decline in activities of daily life (ADL) function and/or ADL participation as evidenced by need for total (assistance) with ADLs,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure foods were prepared and stored in a safe manner to prevent spoilage and contamination and failed to maintain the kitchen environment in a sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect all 72 residents who received food from the kitchen. The facility identified four (#1, #44, #50, and #74) residents who received no food by mouth and no food from the kitchen. The facility census was 76.Findings include:Observation on 03/16/26 at 8:10 A.M. of the kitchen found significant dust build up on the ceiling vent and on the ceiling surrounding the vent over the coffee area, juice dispenser, toaster and preparation area.Observation on 03/16/26 at 8:16 A.M. of the walk-in cooler found a box of multiple cartons of liquid eggs being stored on the floor.Interview on 03/16/26 at 8:18 A.M. with Dietary Supervisor (DS) #698 verified the box of eggs were being stored on the floor of the walk-in cooler. DS #698 reported deliveries were received on Tuesdays and Fridays and it was noted to be Monday.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, review of the facility water management plan, review of facility policies, and review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Legionella control guidance, the facility failed to ensure measures to prevent the growth of Legionella were implemented, failed to ensure urinary catheter drainage bags were maintained in a manner to prevent infection, failed to ensure appropriate personal protective equipment was worn during high-contact care interactions for residents on enhanced barrier precautions, and failed to ensure appropriate hand hygiene was maintained and performed during resident interactions involving potential exposure to bodily fluids. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 76 residents residing in the facility. The census was 76. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility risk management plan for Legionella control revealed that control of Legionella would involve the on-going review and removal of long…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided a call light that accommodated the resident's needs. This affected one (#7) of one residents reviewed for accommodation of needs. The facility census was 76.Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included unspecified parkinsonism, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, paranoid schizophrenia, major depressive disorder, suicidal ideations, dementia, and anxiety disorder. Review of the significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #7 dated 01/06/26 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 indicating the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. Functional abilities for Resident #7 were assessed as dependence on others for eating, oral hygiene, toileting, showering/bathing, upper/lower body dressing and personal hygiene. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were bathed per their scheduled preference. This affected one (#46) of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility census was 76.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #46 revealed he was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure, alveolar hypoventilation, morbid obesity, neurogenic bladder, hypertension, dependence on ventilator, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, type two diabetes mellitus, depression, and anxiety.Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #46 revealed he was cognitively intact at the time of the assessment and did not exhibit any behaviors nor refusals of care. The resident was dependent for all activities of daily living and transfers, and was incontinent of bowel and had a urinary catheter in place.Interview on 03/16/26 at 10:45 A.M. with Resident #46…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure adequate monitoring for psychotropic medication effectiveness, side effects, and adverse effects was completed. This affected two (#2 and #3) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 76.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included unspecified head injury, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and psychophysiologic insomnia. Review of a significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #2 dated 02/06/26 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating Resident #2 was cognitively intact. Resident #2's behaviors were assessed to include physical symptoms such as hitting or scratching self, pacing, rummaging, public sexual acts, disrobing in public, throwing or smearing food or bodily wastes, or verbal/vocal symptoms like screaming, disruptive sounds happening one to three…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of electronic mail (email) documents, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided a safe and appropriate discharge. This affected one (#84) of three residents reviewed for transfer and discharge. The facility census was 76.Findings include: Review of Resident #84's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/23/25 and a discharge date of 02/13/26. Diagnoses included epilepsy, traumatic brain injury, anxiety disorder, mood disorder, depression, tracheostomy status, and thyroiditis.Review of Resident #84's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of zero indicating Resident #84 was rarely or never understood. A Staff Assessment for Mental Status was completed and Resident #84 was noted to have short and long term memory problems. Resident #84 required moderate assistance with toilet use, bathing, and dressing. Resident #84 displayed physical behavioral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review, resident and staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure pressure ulcer prevention measures were in place as ordered. This affected one (#11) of one residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 76.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #11 revealed an admission date of 03/28/21 with diagnoses of hemiplegia and hemiparesis, aphasia, and anxiety. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/16/26, revealed Resident #11 had impaired cognition and was dependent on staff for transfers and mobility. Further review revealed Resident #11 was at risk for skin breakdown and had no pressure ulcers at the time of the assessment.Review of the care plan initiated 01/05/22, and revised 03/19/26, revealed Resident #11 was at risk for impaired skin integrity related to activities of daily living (ADL) needs, incontinence, and frail/thin skin. Interventions included use of pressure reduction devices as needed. Further review revealed Resident #11 was at risk for decline in ADL…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 30 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure non-pharmacological interventions were attempted prior to receiving an as-needed pain medication. This affected one (#63) of one residents reviewed for pain. The facility census was 76.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #63 revealed an admission date of 04/02/25 with diagnoses of dementia, rheumatoid arthritis, disc degeneration, and neuropathy. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/24/25, revealed Resident #63 had intact cognition, received as-needed pain medications, and did not receive non-medication interventions for pain.Review of the care plan, initiated 04/03/25, revealed Resident #63 was at risk for alteration in comfort due to complaints of pain, generalized pain, and gastroesophageal reflux disease. Interventions included but were not limited to staff attempting non-pharmacological interventions if the resident allowed.Review of the physician order dated 11/21/25 revealed Resident #63 received oxycodone hydrochloride (HCl)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility guidelines, the facility failed to ensure resident-specific interventions were implemented to address a resident's history of trauma. This affected three (#63, #13 and #2) of three residents reviewed for trauma informed care and treatment. The facility census was 76. Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #63 revealed an admission date of 04/02/25 with diagnoses of dementia, bipolar disorder, and depression. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/24/25, revealed Resident #63 had intact cognition. Review of Resident #63's comprehensive care plan, initiated 04/02/25 and revised 04/15/25, revealed Resident #63 had trauma related to sexual abuse. Interventions included providing reassurance and comfort measures if applicable; provide visits to the resident to communicate the activity schedule and encourage the resident to participate in social interactions; and referral to psychiatric services and/or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered per physician order. This affected one (#63) of five residents reviewed for medications. The facility census was 76.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #63 revealed an admission date of 04/02/25 with diagnoses of dementia, hypertension, and anxiety. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/24/25, revealed Resident #63 had intact cognition.Review of the physician order dated 08/29/25 revealed Resident #63 received midodrine hydrochloride (HCl) tablet 2.5 milligrams (mg) to give one table by mouth every eight hours for hypotension with instructions to give the medication for systolic blood pressure (SBP; the reading of pressure against the artery walls when the heart beats and is represented as the top number of a blood pressure reading) less than 100 millimeters of Mercury (mmHg). Review of Resident #63's February 2026 medication administration record (MAR) revealed Resident #63 received midodrine HCl on 02/09/26 at 10:00 P.M. for a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, medical record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored in a secure manner. This affected one (#9) of one residents reviewed for hemodialysis and related care. The facility census was 76.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #9 revealed an admission date of 05/13/21 with diagnoses of dementia, heart disease, and end stage renal disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/23/25, revealed Resident #9 had intact cognition and received dialysis.Review of the current physician order, initiated 01/09/26, revealed Resident #9 received midodrine hydrochloride (HCl) oral tablet 10 milligrams (mg) with instructions to give 10 mg orally in the afternoon every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday, and send with the resident to dialysis.Review of the current physician order, initiated 01/20/26, revealed Resident #9 went to an offsite hemodialysis (HD) clinic three times weekly and as needed for HD.Interview on 03/17/26 at 10:23 A.M. with Registered Nurse (RN) #706 revealed Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0777 — isolated
    Provide or obtain x-rays/tests when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident representative interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure diagnostic testing results were obtained and communicated in a timely manner. This affected one (#44) of one residents reviewed for diagnostic testing. The facility census was 76.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #44 revealed he was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including respiratory failure, depression, anxiety, pneumonia, neurogenic bladder, acute infarction of the spinal cord, hypertension, and gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #44 revealed he was cognitively impaired. Resident #44 experienced functional range of motion limitations on both sides to his upper and lower extremities and was dependent for all care and transfers.Interview on 03/16/26 at 2:23 P.M. with Resident #44's representative revealed diagnostic testing results completed in January 2026 had not been communicated to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's medical record was complete to include communication with a dialysis provider. This affected one (#9) of one residents reviewed for hemodialysis. The facility census was 76.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #9 revealed an admission date of 05/13/21 with diagnoses of dementia, heart disease, and end stage renal disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/23/25, revealed Resident #9 had intact cognition and received dialysis.Review of a document on the hemodialysis (HD) clinic's letterhead titled, Patient Curfew Letter, dated 10/01/25, revealed Resident #9 was receiving emergency HD treatments at the clinic in the area and the scheduling of the treatments required him/her to be traveling through the area during hours before and after curfew. Review of Resident #9's nursing progress notes dated 10/01/25 through 02/25/26 revealed communication between the facility and Resident #9's HD clinic was documented on 10/31/25, 11/13/25, 12/08/25, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADL) received adequate assistance with personal hygiene. This affected one (#16) of three residents reviewed for ADL care. The facility census was 75. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #16 revealed an admission date of 03/30/18. Diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure, tracheostomy status, ventilator dependent, quadriplegia, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #16 was severely cognitively impaired and was dependent on staff for all ADL care. Review of the care plan revised 08/2025 revealed Resident #16 was care planned for risk for decline in ADL function with an intervention of total dependent assistance for all ADL care. Review of the facility's shower schedule revealed Resident #16 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-08 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interview, medical record review, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to maintain a clean, sanitary, and homelike environment. This had the potential to affect all 72 residents residing in the facility. The census was 72. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #64 revealed an admission date of 07/19/24 and diagnoses of malignant neoplasm of lower third of esophagus, hypothyroidism, diabetes mellitus type two, protein-calorie malnutrition, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hepatitis C, morbid obesity, bacteremia, and hypertension. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #64 revealed a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating Resident #64 was cognitively intact. Interview on 10/07/24 at 8:01 A.M. with Resident #64 revealed the toilet and the toilet riser in his restroom had not been cleaned and were covered with feces. Resident #64 also stated the linens on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of the facility investigation, review of the facility's Self-Reported Incidents, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure incidents of potential neglect related to elopement of cognitively impaired residents were reported to the state agency. This affected one resident (#3) of three residents reviewed for risk of elopement. The facility census was 72. Findings include: Review of Resident #3's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/26/24. Diagnoses included dementia, frontotemporal neurocognitive disorder, seizures, general anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, osteoarthritis, cognitive communication deficit, and hallucinations. Review of Resident #3's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of zero indicating Resident #3 was rarely or never understood. A Staff Interview for Mental Status was completed and indicated Resident #3 was severely cognitively impaired.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record review, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide supervision to prevent resident elopement for residents identified as at risk for elopement. This affected one resident (#3) of three residents reviewed for being at risk for wandering and elopement. The facility census was 72. Findings include: Review of Resident #3's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/26/24. Diagnoses included dementia, frontotemporal neurocognitive disorder, seizures, general anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, osteoarthritis, cognitive communication deficit, and hallucinations. Review of Resident #3's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of zero indicating Resident #3 was rarely or never understood. A Staff Interview for Mental Status was completed and indicated Resident #3 was severely cognitively impaired. Resident #3 was independent with mobility and required moderate assistance with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolated
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, resident interview, facility exterminator interview, and review of facility exterminator treatments, the facility failed to have an effective pest control program for bed bugs. This affected one resident (#9) of three residents reviewed for pest control. The facility census was 72. Findings include: Review of Resident #9's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/16/24. Diagnoses included respiratory failure, type II diabetes, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, muscle wasting, convulsions, cognitive communication deficit, and altered mental status. Review of Resident #9's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of five indicating Resident #9 was severely cognitively impaired. Resident #9 was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living as well as bed mobility and transfer. Resident #9 displayed no behaviors during the review period. Review of Resident #9's progress notes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-29 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to document meal intakes per dietician recommendation and care plan intervention to monitor for weight status. This affected two (#35 and #61) of three residents reviewed for weight loss. The census was 68. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #35 revealed an admission date of 03/18/24 with diagnoses including but not limited to displaced fracture of the posterior column of the left acetabulum, dysphagia, burn of respiratory tract, hypertension, and dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #35 had severe cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff for eating. Review of the care plan dated 03/18/24 revealed Resident #35 has potential for alteration in nutrition and hydration status related to possible significant weight loss since initial admission and underweight status. Interventions included to add enhanced foods to every meal, assist and/or feed the resident as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-13 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and review of policy, the facility failed to ensure a resident was assessed for self administration and physician orders were obtained to self administer. This affected one (#43) of one resident observed to have medications at the bedside. The facility census was 75. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #43 revealed an admission date of 09/28/23, with a diagnoses of diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), congestive heart failure (CHF), and hearing loss. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #43 is cognitively intact. Review of the current monthly physician orders for Resident #43 revealed no order for refresh eye drops and there was not an order for self-administration of the eye drops. Review of the assessments for Resident #43 revealed there was no assessment for self-administration of medication in the medical record. Review of the care plan for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-13 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure proper and timely notice was given to residents when they were discharged from skilled service. This affected two (#63 and #79) of three sampled residents who were discharge from skilled services in the past six months. The facility census was 75. Findings Include: Review of the Beneficiary Notification for Resident #63 revealed Resident #63 began Medicare Part A services on 09/20/23 and his last covered day was 10/19/23. A Notification of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) form CMS 10123 was documented as not provided. In addition, Resident #63 remained in the facility and a skilled nursing facility advanced beneficiary notice of non-coverage (ABN) form CMS-1005 was not provided. Review of the Beneficiary Notification for Resident #79 revealed Resident #79 began Medicare Part A services on 10/18/23 and his last covered day was 12/07/23. A Notification of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) form CMS 10123 was provided and signed on 12/06/23. In addition, Resident #79 remained in the facility and a skilled nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and review of policy, the facility failed to ensure a resident's care plans were revised to include supports and interventions to address communication needs. This affected two (#6 and #46) of three residents reviewed for communication. The facility census was 75. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #46's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/12/24. Diagnoses included cerebral palsy, contracture of multiple locations, epilepsy, developmental disorder, cognitive communication deficit, and schizophrenia. Review of Resident #46's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of zero indicating Resident #46 was rarely or never understood. A staff assessment for mental status was completed and indicated Resident #46 had short and long term memory problems. Resident #46 was severely cognitively impaired. Resident #46 was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living. Resident #46 displayed physical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and review of policy, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was dependent on staff for care received personal hygiene care as desired. This affected one (#6) of two resident's reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility census was 75. Findings include: Review of Resident #6's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/15/24. Diagnoses included quadriplegia, protein calorie malnutrition, convulsions, severe sepsis with septic shock, dysphagia, and gastrostomy status. Review of Resident #6's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of zero indicating Resident #6 was rarely or never understood. Resident #6 was totally dependent on staff for all activities of daily living. Resident #6 displayed no behaviors during the review period. Review of Resident #6's care plan revised 01/16/24 revealed supports and interventions risk for alteration in comfort, self-care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were in place and residents received post fall assessments as required. This affected two (#36 and #55) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 75. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #36 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included unspecified dementia with other behavioral disturbances, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris, other hyperlipidemia, hypertensive chronic kidney disease, anxiety disorder due to known physiological condition, major depressive disorder recurrent, anxiety disorder due to known physiological condition, major depressive disorder, chronic kidney disease, fibromyalgia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/24/24, revealed Resident #36 was moderately cognitively impaired. Review of the most recent care plan dated 05/24/19 revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-13 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a resident received enteral feeding (delivery of nutrients through a feeding tube directly into the stomach, duodenum, or jejunum) per physicians orders. This affected one (Resident #31) of one resident reviewed for enteral feeding. The facility identified six residents that required total nutrition by enteral feeding. The facility census was 75. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #31 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of dysphagia and gastrostomy. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #31 had cognitive impairment. Resident #31 received total nutrition by enteral feeding and has not had any weight loss. Review of the current physician orders for 03/2024 for Resident #31 revealed an order enteral feeding of Vital AF 1.2 at 65 milliliters (ml) per hour for 22 hours, off from 3:00 A.M. to 5:00 A.M. for Synthroid medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to maintain appropriate emergency tracheostomy supplies at the bedside of a resident with a tracheostomy. This affected one (#53) of two residents reviewed for tracheostomy and ventilator. The facility identified six residents that required tracheostomy emergency supplies at the bedside. The facility census was 75. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #53 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included malignant neoplasm of the head, face, neck, glottis, and larynx, and tracheostomy. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #53 was cognitively intact and required suctioning and tracheostomy care. Review of the current monthly physician orders for Resident #53 revealed to verify emergency equipment in room to include ambu bad, oxygen, and suction canister, if tracheostomy becomes dislodged maintain patent airway, notify…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-13 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to develop interventions for dementia care. This affected one (Resident #64) of one resident reviewed for dementia care. The facility census was 75. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #64 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included other specified disorders of brain, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, diffuse traumatic brain injury with loss of consciousness status unknown, acute respiratory failure with hypercapnia, Parkinson's disease, depression, dementia with agitation, and adult failure to thrive. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/07/24, revealed Resident #64 was severely cognitively impaired. Resident #64 had verbal or other behavioral practices exhibited one to three of seven days. Review of the most recent care plan revealed the care plan did not include interventions for Resident #64's diagnoses of dementia. Interview on 03/13/24 at 11:10 A.M.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-13 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents rooms were clean and provided with clean linen. This affected three (#28, #44, and #64) of three residents reviewed for physical environment. The facility census was 75. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #28 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease with late onset, muscle weakness, paranoid personality disorder, restlessness and agitation, major depressive disorder recurrent, Parkinson's disease, and schizophrenia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/11/24, revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired. Resident #28 required partial/moderate assistance with chair to bed transfer, toilet transfer, and tub/shower transfer. Observation on 03/10/24 at 10:18 A.M., revealed Resident #28's floor had what appeared to be approximately 8 inch diameter of jelly smeared on the floor right next to the resident's bed.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-02 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a clean and sanitary environment. This affected six (Residents #53, #74, #78, #79, #81, and #82) of six residents reviewed for environment. The facility census was 74. Findings include: Observation on 12/28/23 at 12:25 P.M. revealed light red colored sponge like spots covering all walkable areas of Resident #57's floor. Subsequent interview with Resident #57 revealed the spots were blood from when her foot wound bled through the dressing yesterday. Resident #57 verified the dressing was changed but the blood was not cleaned. Observation on 12/28/23 at 4:45 P.M. revealed the identified blood spots throughout Resident #57's floor had not been cleaned and remained visible. Interview on 12/28/23 at 4:37 P.M. with Laundry and Housekeeping Supervisor #203 verified housekeeping had not cleaned Resident #57's hall due to leaving early. Housekeeping and Laundry Supervisor #203 verified the blood spots throughout the floor. Subsequent interview with the unknown aide working the hall…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-02 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident and staff interview, and facility policy the facility failed to ensure clean and sufficient laundry was available to residents. This affected three (Residents #60, #64, and #68) of three residents reviewed. The facility census was 74. Findings include: Observation on 12/26/23 and 12/28/23 revealed a common area inaccessible to residents with an abundant of both hung, folded, and unfolded clothing and blankets. Interview on 12/26/23 at 10:56 A.M. with State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #202 revealed the only concern they have at the facility is supplies, specifically towels and resident laundry. STNA #202 reported they always needed to hunt down resident laundry so the resident has something to wear. Interview on 12/26/23 at 11:28 A.M. with Laundry and Housekeeping Supervisor #203 verified the common area inaccessible to residents was used as a folding area. Laundry and Housekeeping Supervisor #203 verified other than what aides were able to do in their spare time laundry had not been folded since last Saturday (3 days). Laundry and Housekeeping…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure resident's received timely assistance with eating. This affected one (Resident #59) of three residents reviewed for assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). The facility census was 74. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #59 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included arthropathic psoriasis, bulimia nervosa, bipolar disorder, suicidal ideations, post traumatic stress disorder, major depressive disorder, hypothyroidism, essential (primary) hypertension. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the residents cognition was not assessed. Resident #59 required supervision or touching experience for eating. Observation on 12/26/23 at 1:00 P.M. revealed Resident #59 laying in bed with his eyes closed. The lunch meal tray was sitting on the bedside table with a plate cover over the food and the tray appeared untouched. Further observation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and facility policy the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were in place. This affected one (Resident #57) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 74. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #57 was initially admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included paranoid schizophrenia, muscle weakness, parkinsonism, auditory hallucinations, anxiety disorder, unspecified lack of coordination, hypothyroidism, and major depressive disorder recurrent severe with psychotic symptoms. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was rarely understood. Review of the most recent care plan revealed Resident #57 was care planned for falls due to impaired balance/poor coordination, use of psychotropic medications, impaired decision making and unsteady balance. Interventions included having a perimeter mattress. Observation on 12/26/23 at 1:06 P.M. revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-25 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interviews, review of menu, and policy review, the facility failed to provided residents with the proper size meal portions as directed by the facility dietician. This affected 35 residents who received the turkey pot pie meal and did not affect 29 (#9, #10, #13, #18, #20, #24, #25, #26, #27, #29, #33, #40, #42, #43, #46, #50, #51, #52, #54, #55, #56, #57, #58, #60 #61, #62, #63, #64, and #65) residents who received alternate meat or does not receive meal service. The facility census was 64. Findings include: Review of the dietician provided dietary menu dated Week 4, Monday revealed the meal at lunch would be turkey pot pie served in eight-ounce portions over a biscuit. Observation of meal service on 09/25/23 at 11:42 A.M., revealed [NAME] #400 began plating the turkey pot pie using a six-ounce scoop. Interview with [NAME] #400 on 09/25/23 at 11:42 A.M., verified she was serving six ounces of the turkey pot pie because she felt eight ounces would be too much for the residents. Interview with the Dietary Manager on 09/25/23 at 11:43 A.M., verified that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-25 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolated
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain an adequate pest control program. This affected one (#40) of four resident rooms observed for pest control. The facility census was 64. Findings include: Review of Resident #40's medical record revealed an admission date of 05/26/23, with diagnoses including: epilepsy, left below the knee amputation, peripheral vascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, alcohol dependence, and adult failure to thrive. Review of Resident #40's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed he had a moderate loss of cognitive function. He required supervision for all activities of daily living. Interview with Resident #40 on 09/25/23 at 11:15 A.M., revealed he had bugs in his room, and no one would do anything about the issue. Resident #40 stated he reported the infestation to State Tested Nursing Aide (STNA) on 09/22/22 but nothing was done about the problem. Observation of Resident #40's room on 09/25/23 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-25 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to notify the physician and family of a decreased oral intake for one (#6) out of three residents reviewed for notification. The facility census was 69. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #6 revealed an admission date of 07/12/23. Admitting diagnoses for Resident #6 included cerebral infarct, vascular dementia, hypertension, acute kidney failure, insomnia, anxiety disorder, and hyperlipidemia. Resident #6 was discharged on 08/10/23 to the hospital. Review of the admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #6 was on a regular diet with thin liquids and had no difficulty swallowing. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/19/23, revealed Resident #6 had moderate cognitive impairment and had disorganized thinking. The resident required supervision after setup for eating. Review of the care plan initiated on 07/20/23, revealed Resident #6 was noted with potential for altered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-01-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to store food items in a safe and sanitary manner. This affected 52 residents who received food from the kitchen. The facility identified eight (#3, #5, #9, #18, #27, #49, #51, #58) residents who have orders for nothing by mouth and receive no food or drinks from the kitchen. The census was 60. Findings include: Observation on 01/03/22 at 9:07 A.M., during tour of the kitchen revealed two large pitchers which contained a yellow substance that had no labels or dates. There were sliced tomatoes in the walk-in refrigerator that were labeled as sliced on 12/30/21 and meatballs that were prepared on 12/29/21. Interview on 01/04/22 at 1:20 P.M., with the Dietary Manager (DM) #104 stated left over foods and drinks that are opened can be kept in the refrigerator for three days before they are discarded. DM #104 verified the items in the walk-in refrigerator that were not discarded appropriately and the yellow substance that was not labeled or dated. Review of a facility policy titled, Food Preparation and Service,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-01-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, staff interview and policy reviews, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered in a sanitary manner. This affected one (#57) of five residents observed during medication administration. The census was 60. Findings include: Observation on 01/04/22 at 10:53 A.M., revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #206 prepared to administer medications to Resident #57 on the 100 Hall. LPN #206 used her bare hands to remove medication cards, packs, and bottles from the medication cart. LPN #206 was not able to locate one of Resident #57's ordered medication so she retrieved the keys to the medication storage room and used her bare hands to open the door, sort through medications stored in the storage room, and exit the medication storage room. LPN #206 then returned to the medication cart without washing or sanitizing her hands. LPN #206 removed Resident #57's blood pressure medication Lisinopril 10 milligrams (mg) tablet from a medication card directly into her unsanitized hand and placed it into a plastic medication cup for Resident #57 to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$75,286 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $75,286 — penalty dated 2023-08-25

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AYDEN HEALTHCARE — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.1-0.1 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 51.9-0.9 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 51.8+0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.5+0.5 vs chain
The other 10 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.1★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
BUCKEYE FAMILY TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL51%since 12/31/2025
ASCHENDORF, JONATHANIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2023
KAPLAN, YISROELIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/31/2021
BRICKMAN, KRISTOPHERIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2024
KAHLE, KIMBERLYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/22/2024
LAHASKY, EPHRAMIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/31/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+8.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$543K
Related-party expense6% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 81%Medicare 5%Other / private 15%

About 81% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $543K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$353per resident / day
operating cost
$10,732per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$386per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365617. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next