Garden Park Health Care Center
3536 Washington Ave, Cincinnati, OH 45229 · For profit - Corporation · 60 certified beds · (513) 751-4900 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567)
- a high number of inspection citations overall (52) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 2.0% | 5.3% | 15.4% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.6% | 6.2% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.4% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 88.5% | 30.1% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.6% | 3.2% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 2.1% | 6.1% | 16.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 15.1% | 25.5% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.7% | 94.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.3% | 3.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 18.0% | 21.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 13.3% | 8.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 5.2% | 1.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 31.0% | 75.6% | 79.4% | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.11 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 7% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 48.1 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.22 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.48 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.90 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.67 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.44 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.56 to 0.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 53% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
52 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 42 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow contact precautions to help prevent the transmission of communicable infections. This affected two residents (Residents #44 and #78) of four residents reviewed for wound care. The facility census was 50.Findings include:Record review revealed Resident #78 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection bacteremia. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #78 was cognitively intact.The physician orders for Resident #78 dated 03/30/26 revealed an order for contact isolation due to MRSA bacteremia, a highly transmissible pathogen requiring a single room isolation where all services are rendered in room only. An order dated 03/29/26 revealed to cleanse wound to left lower calf, apply silver alginate, and cover with bordered foam gauze every day. Resident #78 also had an order dated 03/30/26 for daptomycin intravenous solution 640…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-01 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure medications were delivered and administered in a timely manner. This affected one (Resident #11) two residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 52 residents. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #11 revealed an admission date of 02/27/26 with diagnosis including infective endocarditis, hepatitis C, severe sepsis, and pneumonia. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #11 revealed an order dated 02/28/26 at 1:53 A.M. cefazolin sodium IV solution two grams per IV three times a day for infection until 03/31/26. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #11 dated 03/03/26 revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required supervision with activities of daily living (ADLs.)Review of the care plan for Resident #11 dated 03/06/26 revealed the resident was on intravenous (IV) medications related to endocarditis.Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for Resident #11…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to administer medications per physician orders resulting in four medication errors out of 41 opportunities or a 9.75 percent (%) medication error rate. This affected three (#4, #5, and #17) out of five residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 46. Findings include: Record review for Resident #4 revealed this resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: left ventricular failure, muscle weakness, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed this resident had moderate impaired cognition evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of eight. This resident was assessed to require supervision or touching assistance for eating, oral hygiene, and toileting. Partial/moderate assistance for dressing and personal hygiene. Resident is always continent of bladder and occasionally…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-08-07 · tag F0730 — widespreadObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on personnel record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) received annual performance evaluations. This had the potential to affect all of the residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 48 residents.Findings include: Review of the personnel file for Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #213 revealed a hire date of 03/27/23 with no performance evaluations from 03/27/24 to 08/07/25. Review of the personnel file for CNA #224 revealed a hire date of 08/29/23 with no performance evaluations from 08/29/23 to 08/07/25. Interview on 08/07/25 at 8:47 A.M. with Human Resources #202 verified the facility had not completed annual performance evaluations for CNAs #213 and #224. Review of the facility policy titled Performance Evaluations dated September 2020 revealed the job performance of each employee should be reviewed and evaluated at least annually.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on personnel record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to implement their tuberculosis (TB) control plan for tuberculosis testing of newly hired employees. This had the potential to affect all of the residents residing in the facility. Based on observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility also failed to ensure staffed practiced appropriate hand hygiene during medication administration. This affected four (#11, #31, #36, and #47) of four residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 48 residents.Findings include:1.Review of the personnel file for Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #213 revealed a hire date of 03/27/23 with no two- step TB skin test upon hire. Review of the personnel file for CNA #110 revealed a hire date of 11/01/24 with no two-step TB skin test upon hire. Review of the personnel file for Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #227 revealed a hire date of 09/26/24 with no two-step TB skin test upon hire. Review of the personnel file for Housekeeper #247 revealed a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-08-07 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespreadEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on personnel record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) received at least twelve hours of in service annually. This had the potential to affect all of the residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 48.Findings include:Review of the personnel file for Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #209 revealed a hire date of 05/20/80 with no documented in-service education from 05/20/24 to 08/07/25.Review of the personnel file for CNA #213 revealed a hire date of 03/27/23 with no documented in-service education from 03/27/24 to 08/07/25Review of the personnel file for CNA #224 revealed a hire date of 08/29/13 with no documented in-service education from 08/29/23 to 08/07/25.Interview on 08/07/25 at 8:47 A.M. with Human Resources (HR) #202 confirmed the facility did not have documentation of twelve hours of annual in-service education for CNAs #209, #213, and #224. Review of the facility policy titled In-Service Training undated revealed all CNAs employed by the facility must complete…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of facility Self-Reported Incidents (SRIs), review of facility incident investigations, resident interview, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to report allegations of resident-to-resident sexual abuse to the state agency within 24 hours. This affected four (Residents #2, #8, #11, #36) of four residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 48 residents.Findings include:1.Review of the medical record for Resident #36 revealed an admission date of 03/22/22 with diagnoses including dementia, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, anxiety disorder, and osteoarthritis. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #36 dated 07/03/25 revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired and required staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs.) Review of the progress note for Resident #36 dated 07/12/25 at 6:12 P.M. revealed staff witnessed the resident sitting in the lap of another peer and kissing him.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-07 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of facility Self-Reported Incidents (SRIs), review of facility incident investigations, resident interview, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to thoroughly and timely investigate allegations of resident-to-resident sexual abuse This affected four (Residents #2, #8, #11, #36) of four residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 48 residents.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #36 revealed an admission date of 03/22/22 with diagnoses including dementia, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, anxiety disorder, and osteoarthritis. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #36 dated 07/03/25 revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired and required staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs.) Review of the progress note for Resident #36 dated 07/12/25 at 6:12 P.M. revealed staff witnessed the resident sitting in the lap of another peer and kissing him. Staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-07 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to notify the Ombudsman's office of resident hospitalizations and discharges from the facility. This affected one (Resident #56) of four residents reviewed for discharges. The facility census was 48 residents.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #56 revealed an admission date of 02/28/25 with diagnoses including encephalopathy, opioid use, and chronic viral hepatitis C and a discharge date of 03/20/25. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #56 dated 02/28/25 revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of the medical record for Resident #56 revealed it did not include documentation of Ombudsman notification of the resident's hospitalization and discharge from the facility.Interview on 08/07/25 at 9:17 A.M with the Administrator confirmed the facility did not notify the Ombudsman of Resident #56's discharge from the facility on 03/20/25. Review of the facility policy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-07 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, resident staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure resident Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurately coded for falls and contractures. This affected one (Resident #31) of 14 residents reviewed for MDS assessment accuracy. The facility census was 48 residents.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #31 revealed an admission date of 04/07/25 with diagnoses including type two diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, depression, and spastic hemiplegia. Review of the progress note for Resident #31 dated 04/10/25 at 6:07 P.M. revealed the resident had a fall on the floor near the bed. Review of the interdisciplinary team (IDT) progress note for Resident #31 dated 04/11/25 revealed the resident was found on the floor on 04/10/25. Resident #31 stated he fell attempting to self-transfer himself to his wheelchair.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #31 dated 04/14/25 revealed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 42 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-07 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to accurately complete the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) for newly admitted residents. This affected one (Resident #11) of two residents reviewed for PASARR completion. The facility census was 48 residents.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #11 revealed an admission date of 02/12/25 with diagnoses including radiculopathy, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, and congestive heart failure.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #11 dated 05/21/25 revealed the resident was moderately cognitively impaired and required staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs).Review of the PASARR for Resident dated 01/17/25 revealed the resident's diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder was not included on the PASARR.Interview on 08/06/25 at 8:18 A.M with the Administrator verified Resident #11's diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder was not listed or marked on the PASARR. Interview on 08/06/25 at 9:47 A.M. with Social Services Designee (SSD) #259…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to develop a care plan for a hand contractures. This affected one (Resident #31) of 14 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 48 residents.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #31 revealed an admission date of 04/07/25 with diagnoses including type two diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, depression, and spastic hemiplegia.Review of the care plan for Resident #31 initiated 04/07/25 revealed it did not include a care plan for hand contractures.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #31 dated 04/14/25 revealed the resident had no impairment of the upper extremity including the shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand that interfered with daily functions or placed the resident at risk for injury.Review of the MDS assessment for Resident #31 dated 07/15/25 revealed the resident was cognitively intact, required staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs), and had no impairment of the upper extremity including…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to update care plans for residents who smoked cigarettes. This affected two (Residents #21 and #18) of four residents reviewed for smoking. The facility census was 48 residents. Findings include: 1.Review of medical record for Resident #21 revealed an admission date of 10/27/24 with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis, subdural hematoma, anxiety disorder, anti-social disorder, and spondylosis. Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #21 dated 10/27/24 revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required supervision with activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of the smoking assessment for Resident #21 dated 10/27/24 revealed there was a box checked indicating the resident was to be supervised during smoking times. The assessment was unscored and did not indicate if the resident was an independent or supervised smoker. Review of the care plan for Resident #21 dated 11/26/24 revealed the resident was to be supervised during smoking…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide appropriate hand and nail hygiene for dependent residents. This affected one (Resident #15) of four residents reviewed for hand and nail care. The facility census was 48 residents.Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #15 revealed an admission date of 12/28/23 with diagnoses including included cerebral infarction, diabetes, hypertension, and aphasia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #15 dated 02/13/25 revealed the resident had moderately impaired cognition and required staff assistance with bathing and personal hygiene. Observation on 08/06/25 at 8:44 A.M. of Resident #15 revealed the resident communicated via an iPad but had difficulty using the device because his fingernails were too long. The resident's nails also had debris underneath them. Interview on 08/06/25 at 8:47 A.M. with Resident #25 confirmed his nails were too long and staff had not offered to cut them, and the length of the nails made it difficult…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-07 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to provide treatment for a resident contractures. This affected one (Resident #31) of two residents reviewed for limited range of motion and contractures. The facility census was 48 residents. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #31 revealed an admission date of 04/07/25 with diagnoses including type two diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, depression, and spastic hemiplegia.Review of the care plan for Resident #31 initiated 04/07/25 revealed it did not include a care plan for hand contractures.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #31 dated 04/14/25 revealed the resident had no impairment of the upper extremity including the shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand that interfered with daily functions or placed the resident at risk for injury.Review of the MDS assessment for Resident #31 dated 07/15/25 revealed the resident was cognitively intact, required staff assistance with activities of daily living…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure resident fall prevention interventions were in place as ordered by the physician and per the resident care plan. This affected one (Resident #31) of four residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 48.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #31 revealed an admission date of 04/07/25 with diagnoses including type two diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, depression, and spastic hemiplegia. Review of the fall risk assessment for Resident #31 dated 04/10/25 revealed the resident had one to two falls in the past three months and was at risk for falls. Review of the fall care plan for Resident #31 dated 06/04/25 revealed the resident had a potential for injuries and falls related to a balance deficit and a history of falls. The intervention of adding a fall mat to the right side of the bed was added to the care plan on 07/16/25. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure insulin pens were properly labeled and dated upon opening. This affected three (Residents #4, #38, #51) and had the potential to affect 11 facility-identified residents with orders for insulin. The facility census was 48 residents.Findings include: Observation on [DATE] at 4:16 P.M of medication cart #3 revealed it contained an unlabeled insulin pen with as an open date of [DATE]. Interview on [DATE] at 4:17 P.M with Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) #235 confirmed there was an unlabeled insulin pen with an open date of [DATE] in medication cart #3. Observation on [DATE] at 4:25 P.M of medication cart #2 revealed it contained an open Lantus insulin pen for Resident #4 without an open date, an open Humalog insulin pen for Resident #51 with an open date of [DATE], a Lantus insulin pen for Resident #38 without an open date. Interview on [DATE] at 4:30 P.M with ADON #235 confirmed medication cart #2 contained Resident #4's open and undated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to maintain a clean and safe environment. This affected 36 residents (#01, #02, #03, #04, #05, #06, #078#08, #09, #10, #11, #12, #13, #14, #15, #16, #17, #18, #19, #20, #21, #22, #23, #24, #26, #27, #28, #29, #30, #31, #32, #33, #34, #35, #36, and #37). The facility census was 45. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses of thoracic spinal fracture with paraplegia, protein-calorie malnutrition and schizophrenia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #24 had no cognitive impairment. Observation during the initial tour on 01/30/25 from 5:30 P.M. to 6:15 P.M., revealed the following: 1) Resident #24's room had dirty linen spread all over the floor; the walls had large areas that needed patched, sanded and painted; the floor tile in the area in front of the closet was stained/dirty with a dark,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the facility's dishwasher was maintained in a manner to prevent foodborne illness. This affected 46 residents out of 46 residents that resided at the facility as the facility identified all residents received food from the kitchen. The facility census was 46. Findings include: Observation of the facility's kitchen on 01/08/25 at 12:17 P.M., revealed the facility's dishwasher had a wash and rinse temperature of 120 degrees Fahrenheit. Dietary Manager (DM) #502 was observed testing the chemical in the dishwasher and the dishwasher tested at zero parts per million (ppm). Interview with Dietary Manager (DM) #502 on 01/08/25 at 12:17 P.M., verified the dishwasher was 120 degrees Fahrenheit for the wash and rinse. DM #502 confirmed the dishwasher was a low temperature dishwasher and required chemical to sanitize dishes. DM #502 verified the dishwasher was running at zero ppm for chemical sanitizer This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number OH00161042.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0646 — isolatedNotify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and staff interview, the facility failed notify the state mental health authority with a significant change Pre-admission Screening And Resident Review (PASARR) for a resident with a change in their mental health condition. This affected two (#19 and #46) of three residents reviewed for significant change PASARR. The facility census was 46. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #19's medical record revealed Resident #19 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including acquired absence of left leg below the knee, osteomyelitis, unspecified severe protein calorie malnutrition, enterocolitis due to clostridium difficile, insomnia, type two diabetes mellitus, opioid dependence, other stimulant dependence and cellulitis. Review of Resident #19's PASARR dated 09/13/23, revealed Resident #19 had no diagnoses of mental disorders. Resident #19 had a diagnosis of opioid dependence. Resident #19 did not have indications of serious mental illness. Review of Resident #19's psychiatric…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to develop care plans to address residents' dental needs, medical diagnoses and use of a prosthetic limb. This affected two (#28 and #19) of three residents reviewed for care planning. The facility census was 46. Findings include: 1) Review of Resident #28's medical record revealed Resident #28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included necrotizing fasciitis, other complications of amputation stump, chronic viral hepatitis c, carpal tunnel syndrome bilateral upper limbs, type two diabetes mellitus with other specified complication, insomnia unspecified atrial fibrillation, chronic idiopathic constipation, and opioid dependence. Review of Resident #28's care plan from 10/14/24 to 01/08/25, revealed Resident #28 did not have a care plan to address his dental needs. Review of Resident 28's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident to be cognitively intact and had no natural teeth or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0696 — isolatedProvide appropriate care/assistance for a resident with a prosthesis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's issues concerning a prosthetic limb were addressed in a timely manner. This affected one (#19) of two residents in the facility that had prosthesis. The facility census was 46. Findings include: Review of Resident #19's medical record revealed Resident #19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included acquired absence of left leg below the knee, osteomyelitis, unspecified severe protein calorie malnutrition, enterocolitis due to clostridium difficile, insomnia, type two diabetes mellitus, opioid dependence, other stimulant dependence and cellulitis. Review of Resident #19's progress note dated 04/25/24, revealed a representative from the prosthetic company delivered Resident #19's prosthesis with adjustments made on that date. Review of Resident #19's physical therapy (PT) note dated 05/10/24, revealed Resident #19 was educated on the usage of the left prosthesis, and he was instructed to call the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to report an allegation of misappropriation of resident funds to the Ohio Department of Health (ODH.) This affected one (Resident #33) of three residents reviewed for misappropriation. The facility census was 47 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #33 revealed an admission date of 01/26/24 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), traumatic compartment syndrome of left lower extremity, and major depressive disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #33 dated 07/06/24 revealed the resident had intact cognition and required supervision with activities of daily living (ADLs.) Review of the progress note for Resident #33 dated 09/01/24 timed at 4:03 P.M. per Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #20 revealed Resident #33 reported he had two hundred dollars in his room, and someone had stolen it. LPN #20 documented Resident #33's allegation of misappropriation of money would be reported to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation, interview, review of manufacturer's guidelines, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure medication error rates below five percent (%). This affected three (Residents #21, #26, and #27) of three reviewed for medication administration. The medication error rate was 11.1 % based on 36 medication opportunities and four observed errors. The facility census was 47 residents. Findings include: 1.Review of the medical record for Resident #21 revealed an admission date of 12/20/22 diagnoses including bipolar disorder, congestive heart failure (CHF), and type two diabetes mellitus. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #21 dated 07/09/24 revealed the resident had moderate cognitive impairment and required setup with activities of daily living (ADLs.) Review of the physician's orders for Resident #21 revealed an order dated 08/09/24 for Lantus insulin inject 10 units subcutaneously two times a day for diabetes management and an order dated 09/06/24 for loratadine 10 milligrams (mg) one tablet by mouth…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-25 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — widespreadHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a clean, safe, comfortable environment for all residents This affected all 46 residents who resided in the facility. The facility census was 46. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #27 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included acute cerebrovascular insufficiency, peripheral vascular disease, obesity, diabetes mellitus, major depressive disorder, essential primary hypertension, and atopic neurodermatitis. The record Revealed #27 had moderately impaired cognition. Review of the medical record for Resident #25 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, epilepsy, essential primary hypertension, depression, insomnia, and pneumonia. The record revealed Resident #25 was cognitively intact. Review of the medical record for Resident #24 revealed the resident was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This had the potential to affect all 46 residents who resided in the facility. Findings include: Observation of the kitchen on 07/24/24 at 11:30 A.M. with Dietary Manager (DM) #110, revealed the trash cans located in the kitchen had a build-up of food debris and splatter running down the sides of the container and did not contain a lid. The wall tiles located along the length of the three-compartment sink and extending up the walls contained an unknown black substance which appeared to be consistent with mold. Interview with DM #110 at the same time confirmed the findings in the kitchen. Observation of the tray service line on 07/24/24 at 11:55 A.M., revealed Dietary [NAME] (DC) #109 began the tray line by taking the food temperatures. DC #109 took the food thermometer and placed it directly into the broccoli that measured 270 degrees Fahrenheit (F), then placed the thermometer into…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-07-25 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespreadKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, review of local Health Department records, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to maintain equipment in safe operating condition. This affected two (#24 and #27) of the five residents reviewed for beds /equipment. The facility also failed to ensure the dishwasher was maintained in working order. This had the potential to affect all 46 residents who resided in the facility. Findings include: 1) Review of the medical record for Resident #24 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included cellulitis, asthma, obstructive sleep apnea, bipolar disorder, amnesia, anemia, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and diabetes mellitus. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #24 was cognitively intact, was independent with bed mobility and required supervision with transfers. Interview with Resident #24 on 07/23/24 at 12:08 P.M., revealed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-25 · tag F0924 — patternPut firmly secured handrails on each side of hallways.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure there were secured handrails throughout the hallway on the 200 unit. This had the potential to affect 15 (#22, #23, #24, #25, #26, #27, #28, #29, #30, #31, #32, #33, #34, #25, and #36) independently mobile residents residing on the 200-unit. The facility census was 46. Findings include: Observation of the 200-hall during the initial tour on 07/23/24 at 10:46 A.M. with the Administrator, revealed there were no handrails affixed to the walls in the unit. Interview with the Administrator on 07/23/24 at 10:48 A.M., verified there were no handrails affixed to the walls in the 200-hallway. The Administrator stated they have been remodeling the unit and he wold have to order them. This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Master Complaint Number OH00156054, OH00155202, and OH00155184.
- Potential for harm · E2022-09-21 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a medication regimen review was completed as required by a licensed pharmacist. This affected four (#16, #17, #29, and #44) out of four residents reviewed for medication review. The facility census was 51. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #16 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included unspecified injury of head, subsequent encounter, unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition, dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere with behavioral disturbance, other asthma, opioid use, unspecified with unspecified opioid-induced disorder, cocaine use, unspecified with other cocaine-induced disorder, and nicotine dependence, unspecified with withdrawal. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 06/30/22, revealed this resident had moderately impaired cognition evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-21 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — patternMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to have properly working call lights in all resident rooms. This affected four (#11, #20, #24, and #31) out of 11 residents residing on the unit. The facility census was 51. Findings include: A chart review revealed Resident #11 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including paraplegia, diabetes, anemia, schizophrenia, altered mental status, adult failure to thrive, and hypertension. Review of the Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #11 has severe cognitive deficits, requires limited to extensive assistance with activities of daily living, and is occasionally incontinent of bladder, and always continent of bowel. A chart review revealed Resident #20 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including coronary artery disease, fall history, hyperglycemia, hypertension, dementia, peripheral vascular disease, benign prostatic hyperplasia, depression, and heart failure. Review of the Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-09-21 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of personnel funds documentation, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident fund authorization forms contained an authorized signature. This affected one (#19) out of five resident accounts reviewed. The facility census was 51. Findings include: Review of authorized representative form titled, Resident Fund Management Services, undated, for Resident #19 revealed there was no signature on the authorized representative form. Interview on 09/13/22 at 1:58 P.M. with the facility business office manager (BOM) #450 confirmed Resident #19's form did not contain an authorized signature for the facility to manage the residents funds. Review of the facility policy titled, Deposit Resident Funds, dated April 2017, revealed, Resident personal funds that are held and managed by the facility will be safeguarded.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-21 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure forms indicating advance directives were accurately completed. This affected two (#13 and #47) out of three residents reviewed for advance directives. The facility census was 51. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #13 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included type two diabetes mellitus without complications, unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbance, vitamin d deficiency, muscle weakness, and other abnormalities of gait and mobility. Review of the signed Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) Comfort Care form dated 05/24/22 revealed the box for DNR Comfort Care (CC) was checked. Review of the current physician orders revealed an order dated 05/26/22 for DNRCC Arrest. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 06/06/22, revealed Resident #13 had severely impaired cognition evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of three out of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, resident and staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, and homelike environment for residents. This affected three (#05, #08 and #23) out of three residents reviewed. The facility census was 51. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #05 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnosis included paranoid schizophrenia, history of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), hyperlipemia, vascular dementia, psychotic disturbance, constipation, epileptic seizures, and anxiety disorder. Review of the quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #05 revealed he had intact cognition. Further review of the MDS assessment revealed Resident #05 was independent and required no assistance from staff with bed mobility, transfers, walking, dressing, toilet use, personal hygiene, and eating. Interview on 09/06/22 11:25 A.M. with Resident #05 revealed he had a concern with the gazebo outside his…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-21 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a significant change assessment was completed following discharge from hospice services. This affected one (#47) resident out of three residents reviewed for hospice services. The facility census was 51. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #47 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, unspecified acquired deformity of left hand, anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, other specified anxiety disorders, disorganized schizophrenia, vitamin d deficiency, chronic viral hepatitis c, and personality disorder. Review of the discontinued physician orders revealed an order dated 04/14/21 for admission to Hospice for Resident #47, which was discontinued on 03/19/22. Review of the plan of care, initiated 04/27/21 and resolved 03/18/22, revealed Resident #47 had a decline in condition and received hospice services. Interventions included allow resident to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-21 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) was completed as required following admission to the facility. This affected one resident (#44) out of three residents reviewed for PASARR. The facility census was 51. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #44 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included malignant neuroleptic syndrome, unspecified severe protein-calorie malnutrition, adult failure to thrive, subsequent encounter for suicide attempt, muscle wasting and atrophy, paroxysmal tachycardia, dietary folate deficiency anemia, catatonic schizophrenia, unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, and autistic disorder. Review of the Hospital Exemption from Preadmission Screening Notification, dated 07/08/21 revealed Resident #44 was admitted to the facility from the hospital. Further review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to develop appropriate care plans based on resident needs. This affected three (#25, #16 and #44) out of three residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 51. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #44 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included malignant neuroleptic syndrome, unspecified severe protein-calorie malnutrition, adult failure to thrive, suicide attempt, subsequent encounter, muscle wasting and atrophy, paroxysmal tachycardia, dietary folate deficiency anemia, catatonic schizophrenia, unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, and autistic disorder. Review of the nursing progress note dated 08/06/21 revealed Resident #44 contacted a suicide hotline using a tablet. The note indicated the police called and notified the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON). Resident #44 was placed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision while residents were smoking. This affected three (#16, #23, and #25) out of three residents reviewed for smoking. The facility census was 51. Findings include 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #16 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included unspecified injury of head, subsequent encounter, unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition, dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere with behavioral disturbance, other asthma, opioid use, unspecified with unspecified opioid-induced disorder, cocaine use, unspecified with other cocaine-induced disorder, and nicotine dependence, unspecified with withdrawal. Review of the plan of care, dated 04/01/22, revealed the resident had the potential for injury related to smoking. Interventions included advise resident to wear smoking apron while smoking if indicated, complete…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-09-21 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff interview review of medication information from Medscape, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from unnecessary psychotropic medications when the facility failed to monitor a residents laboratory (lab) work in response to the use of a psychotropic medication. This affected one (#25) out of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Facility census was 51. Findings include Record review for Resident #17 revealed an admission date of 05/10/21. His diagnosis included, sleep apnea, diabetes mellitus 2, hypoxemia, enchephalopathy, anxiety disorder, dementia, mood disturbance, paranoid schizophrenia, seborrheic dermatitis, dysphasia, major depressive disorder, and gastro-esophageal reflux disease. Review of the quarterly MDS assessment, dated 07/14/22, revealed Resident #17 was cognitively impaired. Further review of the MDS assessment revealed Resident #17 required limited assistance from staff with bed mobility. However, Resident #17 required extensive assistance from staff with transfers, personal hygiene, and toilet use. He…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-09-21 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolatedMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program regarding the presence of gnats in a resident's room. This affected one (#23) out of one resident reviewed for effective pest control. The facility census was 51. Findings include: Record review for Resident #23 revealed was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnosis included cerebral infarction, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, history of COVID-19, dysphasia, insomnia, hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus 2, major depressive disorder, suicidal ideation, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and essential primary hypertension. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed Resident #23 was mildly cognitively impaired. Further review of the MDS assessment revealed he was totally dependent on staff with bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene. Resident #23 required supervision from staff with eating. Interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2019-12-30 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure proper disposal of smoking materials. This had to potential to affect all 56 residents residing in the facility . Findings include: Observation on 12/26/19 between 1:15 P.M. and 4:45 P.M. revealed in the large smoking area by kitchen cigarette butts were discarded in bushes next to smoking patio and on the ground next to the smoking area. Cigarette butts were too numerous to count. There were also noted were multiple signs revealing, do not throw cigarette butts on the ground. Observation on 12/26/19 between 1:15 P.M. and 4:45 P.M. revealed cigarette butts discarded on the ground outside first floor exit by food warmers, employee smoking area, and also noted were cigarette butts and ashes in the trash can. Interview with Maintenance Director (MD) #2 at time of the observations above confirmed the findings.
- Potential for harm · D2019-12-30 · tag F0572 — isolatedGive residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of Resident Council Minutes, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to inform and explain the resident's rights at monthly resident council meetings. This had the potential to affect 14 Residents (#1, #11, #13, #14, #18, #30, #38, #40, #44, #45, #46, #54, #55, and #56) who attend Resident Council Meetings. The facility census was 56. Findings include: Review of the Resident Council minutes from 08/19 through 12/19 revealed no evidence any resident rights were discussed at the Resident Council Meetings. Interview on 12/27/19 at 3:30 P.M. with Residents #1, #11, #13, and #18 who regularly attend the monthly resident council meetings revealed they did not recall ever being informed or anyone explaining to them about their rights at the monthly meetings. Interview on 12/27/19 at 3:40 P.M. with the Activity Director #137 confirmed she had not informed or explained any of the resident rights at the monthly resident council meetings.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-12-30 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed properly document resident requested Advanced Directives. This had the potential to affect one resident (#25) of 24 reviewed for advanced directives. The facility census was 56. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia with chronic pain, liver cell carcinoma (cancer), cirrhosis of liver, and osteoarthritis. Review of physician orders revealed Resident #25 was admitted to hospice services on 11/16/19 for diagnosis of liver cancer. Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed a physician order dated 11/20/19 for Resident #25 to be a Do Not Resuscitate Comfort Care (DNR CC) for Advanced Directives. Review of Resident #25 Hard Medical Chart revealed, on the outer binder of the medical record the resident was noted to be a full code status. Inside the medical record revealed the first form was undated, titled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-12-30 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, resident interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide privacy for residents. This affected three residents (#25, #53, and #43) of 24 reviewed for privacy. The facility census was 56. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including; dementia with chronic pain, liver cell carcinoma (cancer), cirrhosis of liver and osteoarthritis. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #25 was severely cognitively impaired with no noted behaviors. Observation and interview on 12/26/19 at 10:59 A.M. Resident #25 revealed the resident was in a room shared with another resident, however there was no noted privacy curtain. Resident #25 revealed he would like to have privacy, however he did not ever remember a time when they had a curtain in the room. Interview on 12/27/19 at 6:18 P.M. with Corporate Nurse (RN)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-12-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, resident interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to maintain a clean and homelike environment. This affected four Resident's rooms (#16, #18, #20, and #210) of 24 observed. The facility census was 56. Findings include: 1. Observation on 12/27/19 at 5:48 P.M. of room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed the resident's wall paper was noted pulled back from the wall exposing large sections of green paint underneath, with thick blue tape noted to be attached in a manor to hold up the wall paper. 2. Observation and interview on 12/27/19 5:50 P.M. of room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed Resident 53's curtain was held up with screws, no curtain rod, and one of the sections had come loose and was left half hanging. Interview with the resident revealed it had been like that for a while and they were supposed to re-hang the curtain, however had not done so. 3. Observation and interview on 12/26/19 at 11:03 A.M. with Resident #25 residing in room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed the light above…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-12-30 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to complete Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for residents following a qualifying status. This affected two Residents (#3 and #25) of 15 residents reviewed for significant changes. The facility census was 56. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cellulitis, hypertension, cerebral infarction, and epilepsy. Further review of the medical record revealed Resident #3 was transferred to the local hospital on [DATE] due to respiratory failure, hypoxia, septic wound and cellulitis. Resident #3 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] at 6:15 P.M. from the local hospital with bilateral above the knee amputation. Review of the Discharge Return Anticipated MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #3 required only supervision assistance with bed mobility and transfer, limited assistance with dressing, and was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-12-30 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to transmit the thirty day and quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for one Resident (#1) of 24 residents reviewed. The facility census was 56. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #1 revealed an admission date of 07/02/19 with diagnoses including type two diabetes mellitus and cerebrovascular infarction (stroke). Review of the quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1's cognition was intact. Review of the clinical MDS tracking revealed the 30 day MDS dated [DATE] and the quarterly MDS dated [DATE] showed incomplete and had not been transmitted. Interview on 12/28/19 at 3:30 P.M. with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) #104 confirmed the 30 day and quarterly MDS assessments for Resident #1 had not been transmitted within the required seven days.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-12-30 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to complete Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments accurately. This affected four Residents ( #50, #53, #1 and #49) of 24 residents reviewed for accuracy of assessments. The facility census was 56. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including osteoarthritis, heart disease, hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting the right side, benign prostatic hyperplasia, and dementia. Review of the quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #50 was severely cognitively impaired, and had an indwelling catheter. Observation and interview on 12/27/19 at 11:44 A.M. with Resident #50 revealed the resident was noted with no indwelling catheter. Resident #50 stated he had a catheter in the past, however it had been gone for a long time. Interview on 12/28/19 at 11:41 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #200 confirmed Resident #50 had an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-12-30 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to timely complete a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level 1 pre-screening for a newly admitted resident. This affected one Resident (#58) of one resident reviewed for PASARR screenings. The facility census was 56. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #58 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral infarction, schizoaffective disorder, hemiplegia affecting non-dominant side, and wheelchair dependence. Further review of the medical record revealed no evidence a PASARR screening had been completed. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for dated 10/17/19 revealed Resident #58 was moderately cognitively impaired, with disorganized thinking behaviors noted. Review of Section E-Behaviors revealed the resident had noted delusions, behavior symptoms not directed towards others however disrupts care or living environment of others, and had rejection of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-12-30 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, resident interview, interview with dental services consultant, resident guardian interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to follow up on recommendations for dentures for two residents (#25 and #2) of four reviewed for Dental Services. The facility census was 56. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia with behavioral disturbance, venous insufficiency, chronic pain, and liver cell carcinoma (cancer). Review of local Dental Services note dated 08/10/19 revealed Resident #25 was seen by dental services with recommendations for dentures. It was noted the resident was edentulous and wanted dentures. The plan was for impressions to be made on the next visit. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #25 was severely cognitively impaired with no noted behaviors. Review of Section L-…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-12-30 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to coordinate care and services for a resident receiving hospice services. This affected one Resident (#25) of one reviewed for hospice services. The facility census was 56. Finding include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia with chronic pain, liver cell carcinoma (cancer), and cirrhosis of the liver. Review of physician orders revealed Resident #25 was admitted to hospice services on 11/16/19 for the diagnosis of liver cancer. Review of the Hospice documentation book and Resident #25's medical record revealed no documentation for hospice services being provided to the resident, and/or no coordination of care between the facility and hospice center. Interview on 12/28/19 at 11:00 A.M. with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) #104 confirmed the facility records contained no information for hospice services and/or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-12-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to provide appropriate infection control measures while providing resident wound care. This affected one Resident (#25) of two reviewed for skin conditions. The facility census was 56. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia with behavioral disturbance and liver cell carcinoma (cancer). Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired with no noted behaviors. Review of Section M-Skin Conditions revealed the resident was at risk for pressure with no noted pressure, however the resident was noted with open lesion other than ulcers. Review of Resident #25's current physician orders revealed an order to apply skin prep to left dorsal second toe daily, every shift, and to cleanse right dorsal foot with wound wash, cover with alginate with silver…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-12-30 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to maintain functional call lights for residents. This affected two rooms (#13 and #203) of 14 observed. The facility census was 56. Findings include: Observation and interview on 12/27/19 at 5:50 P.M. revealed the Resident residing in room [ROOM NUMBER] was yelling out for assistance. The resident had pushed the call light and it was noted to not light up. The Corporate Registered Nurse (RN) #102 confirmed the call light was not functioning. Observation and interview on 12/28/19 at 11:50 A.M. revealed the resident residing in room [ROOM NUMBER] was requesting for assistance. When the resident pressed the call light, it did not light up. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #200 confirmed the call light was not functioning in room [ROOM NUMBER]. Review of facility policy titled, Call Lights dated 12/18 revealed all resident call lights will be functional, in good working order, and responded to timely.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-10-24 for 29 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CARECORE HEALTH — 10 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 1.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
The other 9 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.1★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| CUSTOMERS BANK | Organization | 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST | since 08/14/2020 |
| HERTANU, JOSEPH | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/17/2019 |
| CARECORE HEALTH LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/15/2018 |
| HERTANU, CHAIM | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/15/2018 |
| SEROTA, GRETCHEN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2024 |
| STRICKLAND, JENNIFER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/30/2024 |
| FASTEN HALBERSTAM LLP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/01/2018 |
| GARDEN PARK REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/01/2021 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $240K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365529. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-07, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.