Montgomery Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 28% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 68.6 residents a day — about 69% occupied, or roughly 30 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.31 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.44 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.75 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.78 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.53 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.50 to 0.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 67% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2019-03-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of Resident #33's record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included disorders of lung, dementia with behavioral disturbance, phobic anxiety disorders, chronic kidney disease, alcohol dependence in remission, heat syncope, muscle weakness, and wasting and atrophy. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/20/19, revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment and he required supervision with dressing and personal hygiene and was independent with eating, toileting, bed mobility and transfers. A review of the care plan for Resident #33 revealed he had the potential for injury related to smoking and the facility was to secure his cigarettes and lighter at the nurse's station. Review of the smoking assessment, dated 11/14/18, documented the need for supervision during smoking, the use of a smoking apron and the need for the facility to store his lighter and cigarettes. During an interview with the Director of Nursing on 03/06/19 at 2:18 P.M., she…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-12 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure showers were properly maintained. This affected 12 residents (#6, #8, #10, #11, #13, #14, #20, #21, #23, #26, #30, and #33) identified by the facility that utilized the shower room. The facility census was 64.Findings include:Observations on 08/11/25 at 8:42 A.M. of the shower room on the east unit revealed there were two shower areas. One of the showers had a leaking shower head that sprayed water in various directions when the water was turned on, and the shower handle in the other shower was loose and not secured to the wall.Interview on 08/11/25 at 8:44 A.M. with Maintenance Director (MD) #112 verified the findings at the time of the observations.Review of the facility policy titled, Quality of Life - Homelike Environment, revised 05/2017, revealed residents would be provided with a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment.This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number 2566252 and Complaint Number 2565845.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-12-19 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — pattern
  Provide appropriate foot care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received routine podiatry care. This affected four (Residents #20, #21, #2 and #14) of the four residents reviewed for podiatry services. The facility census was 60. Findings include: 1) Review of the medical record revealed Resident #20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of cerebral infarction with dominant left side hemiplegia and hemiparesis, vascular dementia and chronic kidney disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #20 had moderately impaired cognition, range of motion impairment on left upper and lower extremities and was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of Resident #20's Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care plan dated 12/12/24 revealed Resident #20 had a self-care performance deficit. Interventions included total assistance with personal hygiene daily and as needed. Observation of wound treatment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, observation, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure eye drops were labeled with open date. This affected two (#06 and #19) of the 14 residents with ordered eye drops. The facility also failed to timely dispose of narcotics for residents who were no longer in the facility. This affected two (#213 and #214) residents of the nine residents with narcotics. The facility census was 60. Findings include: 1) Review of the medical record for Resident #06 revealed an admission date of 12/29/21. Diagnoses included glaucoma, Alzheimer's disease, and type two diabetes mellitus (DM II). Review of the physician order dated 02/24/22 revealed Resident #06 was ordered Brimonidine Tartrate 0.2 percent solution, instill one drop in both eyes three times a day related to glaucoma. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #06 had severe cognitive impairment as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to obtain authorization to manage resident funds. This affected two (#23 and #34) out of five residents reviewed for resident funds. The facility census was 60. Findings include: 1) Review of the medical record for Resident #23 revealed an admission date of 07/24/23. Diagnoses included flaccid hemiplegia affecting left non-dominant side, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type two diabetes mellitus without complications, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting unspecified side, anemia, major depressive disorder, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery with other forms of angina pectoris, hyperlipidemia, anxiety disorder, vascular dementia, chronic kidney disease stage three, atrial fibrillation, congestive heart failure, iron deficiency, fibromyalgia, cerebral edema, and vitamin d deficiency. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #23 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure accuracy of assessments related to hearing. This affected one (#03) of one resident reviewed for communication. The facility census was 60. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #03 revealed an admission date of 01/24/24. Diagnoses included unspecified sequelae of unspecified cerebrovascular disease, cerebral infarction due to unspecified occlusion or stenosis of unspecified cerebral artery, hypothyroidism, spastic hemiplegia affecting unspecified side, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following unspecified cerebrovascular disease affecting unspecified side, major depressive disorder, localized edema, rhabdomyolysis, syncope and collapse, acute kidney failure, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, pure hypercholesterolemia, hypertension, and dysphagia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments dated 01/30/24, 05/01/24 and 11/01/24, revealed Resident #03 was cognitively intact, had minimal difficulty with hearing and used hearing aids. Interview on 12/17/24 at 8:56 A.M.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure care conferences were completed quarterly for residents. This affected two (#14 and #20) of three residents reviewed for care conferences. The facility census was 60. Findings include: 1) Review of the medical record revealed Resident #20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses include cerebral infarction with dominant left side hemiplegia and hemiparesis, vascular dementia and chronic kidney disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #20 had moderately impaired cognition. Review of the documentation provided by the Administrator revealed Resident #20 was offered care conferences in the first quarter (January, February and March 2024) and second quarter (April, May and June 2024) of 2024; however, the resident declined the need. A care conference was conducted for Resident #20 in the fourth quarter (October, November and December 2024) on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0685 — isolated
  Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff and resident interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to timely arrange for audiology services. This affected one (#03) of the one resident reviewed for communication. The facility census was 60. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #03 revealed an admission date of 01/24/24. Diagnoses included unspecified sequelae of unspecified cerebrovascular disease, cerebral infarction due to unspecified occlusion or stenosis of unspecified cerebral artery, hypothyroidism, spastic hemiplegia affecting unspecified side, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following unspecified cerebrovascular disease affecting unspecified side, major depressive disorder, localized edema, rhabdomyolysis, syncope and collapse, acute kidney failure, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, pure hypercholesterolemia, hypertension, and dysphagia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #03 was cognitively intact. The assessment also indicated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, observations, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to timely change oxygen tubing per physician orders. This affected one (#14) resident of six residents with oxygen therapy. The facility census was 60. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #14 revealed an admission date of 10/18/22. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), major depressive disorder, and type two diabetes. Review of the care plan dated 11/01/22, revealed Resident #14 had oxygen therapy related to asthma, COPD, and shortness of breath (SOB). Interventions included check oxygen saturation as needed for SOB, encourage or assist with ambulation as indicated, and give medications as ordered by physician. Review of the physician order dated 06/27/24, revealed Resident #14 was ordered may use supplemental oxygen as needed (PRN) two liters per minute (LPM) via nasal cannula every shift for maintaining oxygen saturation greater than 90 percent (%) as…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-20 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, resident and staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to keep a resident's room clean and sanitary. This affected one (Resident #12) of three residents reviewed for environment. The facility census was 57. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #12 revealed an admission date 03/21/24. Diagnosis included anxiety disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #12 was cognitively intact. Interview on 06/20/24 at 10:35 A.M. with Resident #12 stated the housekeeping staff does not wipe down the furniture in her room. Resident #12 stated they do not sweep under her bed, or corners in the room. Resident #12 stated she took out her own trash from her room because it does not get taken care of. Resident #12 stated her toilet was disgusting, dirty, smells, and had urine ring around the toilet. Observation on 06/20/24 at 10:40 A.M. with Resident #12's room revealed all three of her…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2022-03-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policies, the facility failed to ensure that food was stored, prepared, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This had the potential to affect 69 of 70 residents residing in the facility, excluding Resident #50 who received enteral feedings and nothing by mouth. Findings include: 1. An initial tour of the kitchen was conducted on 02/14/22 at 9:45 A.M. with [NAME] #22. While touring the kitchen, the following was observed: 1a. The free-standing walk-in freezer located outside of the building with [NAME] #22 felt very warm and observation revealed a non-functioning thermometer sitting on the shelf. Continued observation revealed the ice cream was completely liquefied, the tater tots, French fries and all vegetables were very soft to touch. [NAME] #22 stated she last got something from the freezer at 5:45 A.M. and everything seemed to be working normally. [NAME] #22 verified the freezer was not working, non-functioning thermometer and numerous food items were thawed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CARECORE HEALTH — 10 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $720K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH