Carecore At Lima
599 South Shawnee Street, Lima, OH 45804 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 88 certified beds · (419) 227-2154 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 5 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (53) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $33,534 in federal fines (most recent 2025-03-11)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (63%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 6.1% | 5.3% | 15.4% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.3% | 6.2% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.4% | 0.4% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 19.6% | 30.1% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.0% | 3.2% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 4.3% | 6.1% | 16.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 26.2% | 25.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 94.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.8% | 3.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 17.3% | 21.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 26.8% | 8.8% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 83.7% | 75.6% | 79.4% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 0.93 | 1.73 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.97 | 1.80 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 24% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.7%CMS range 8.6–18.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.16 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 88 beds and averages 70.9 residents a day — about 81% occupied, or roughly 17 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.11 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.70 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.83 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.68 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.29 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.77 to 0.54 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 63% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
53 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 38 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-03-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of hospital records, observations, staff interviews, interview with Wound Physician #500, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to timely assess, monitor, and implement treatments for Resident #43, who was admitted to the facility with a pressure ulcer on the coccyx. This resulted in Actual Harm when Resident #43 was assessed upon admission on [DATE] with a pressure ulcer to the coccyx but the staff failed to accurately assess the wound to include measurements/description and the staff failed to notify the physician to obtain/implement treatment orders. Subsequently, Resident #43's coccyx pressure ulcer was assessed by the wound physician on 03/04/25 to be unstageable with necrosis and the coccyx pressure ulcer required excisional debridement (surgery) on 03/04/25 and again on 03/06/25. This affected one (#43) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 76. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #43 revealed an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record review, review of fall investigations, staff and resident interviews, review of hospital records, and review of the facility policies, the facility failed to ensure a safe environment to prevent falls, resulting in actual harm when Resident #23 tripped over the legs of an improperly stored mechanical lift resulting in a facial laceration requiring stitches and a fractured left olecranon (elbow) fracture. Further, the facility failed to ensure neurological checks were completed after falls for Resident #22, failed to ensure fall incidents were thoroughly investigated for Resident #22 and Resident #63, and failed to ensure fall preventions were in place for Resident #22. Lastly, the facility failed to ensure a safe environment to prevent falls for Resident #52. This affected four residents (#23, #22, #63, #52) of five residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 80. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #23 revealed an admission date of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2019-07-02 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, observation, policy review and review of information from the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP), the facility failed to ensure monitoring of a pressure sore was completed to ensure appropriate care and treatment was provided to prevent deterioration of a pressure ulcer. This resulted in actual harm when Resident #50's pressure ulcer was not monitored on a weekly basis to ensure proper treatment and interventions were in place resulting in the pressure ulcer deteriorating from a stage two to an unstageable pressure ulcer. This affected one (#50) of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility identified four residents currently residing in the facility with pressure ulcers greater than a stage one. Facility census was 76. Findings include: Review of Resident #50's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/21/14 with diagnoses including dysphagia, gastrostomy, malaise, generalized anxiety disorder, muscle weakness, major depression,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2019-07-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of fall investigations, observations, resident and staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #33's fall interventions were in place as indicated in Resident #33's care plan. The lack of implementing interventions resulted in actual harm when Resident #33 fell, hit her face on the floor and was subsequently hospitalized related to a closed head injury. This affected one (#33) of two residents sampled for falls. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure hazardous chemicals were kept secured. The facility identified two (#63 and #64) of 76 residents who were identified as cognitively impaired, independently mobile and that could potentially access these chemicals. The facility census was 76. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #33's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/12/19. Diagnoses included chronic kidney disease, hypertension, heart disease, ventricular fibrillation, bradycardia, syncope and collapse, anemia,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2019-07-02 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, staff and resident interviews, policy review and review of medication information from Medscape, the facility failed to ensure a resident's pain was properly managed. This resulted in actual harm when Resident #173 experienced uncontrolled severe pain and had difficulty sleeping. This affected one (#173) of one resident reviewed for pain management. The facility identified 42 residents on a pain management program. The facility census was 76. Findings included: Review of Resident #173's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Medical diagnoses included malignant neoplasm of the colon. Review of admission observation dated 06/20/19 revealed she was cognitively intact. Functional status was independent for bed mobility, transfers, eating and toilet use. Review of a pain assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #173 revealed the document did not have a numeric rating or a verbal descriptor scale completed. The assessment further revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-20 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, facility investigative document review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation for an allegation of misappropriation. This affected one (Resident #73) of three resident misappropriation allegations reviewed. The census was 71.Findings Include:Resident #73 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses were muscle wasting and atrophy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypotension, hypo-osmolality and hyponatremia, severe sepsis, atherosclerotic heart disease,. hypothyroidism, hyperlipidemia, congestive heart failure, anxiety disorder, atrial fibrillation, obstructive and reflux uropathy, and major depressive disorder. Review of his Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/20/26, revealed he was cognitively intact.Review of the Self-Reported Incident (SRI) dated 02/27/26, revealed Resident #73 reported on 02/26/26 at 4:45 P.M. that his medications were being taken. Resident #73 was being transported to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-20 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, family interview, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to include the resident's family/Power of Attorney (POA) in the discharge planning process. This affected one (Resident #72) of three resident discharges reviewed. The census was 71.Findings Include:Resident #72 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses were encephalopathy, peripheral vascular disease, unspecified protein calorie malnutrition, acute and chronic respiratory failure, emphysema, respiratory disorder, anxiety disorder, congestive heart failure, hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease, atherosclerotic heart disease, major depressive disorder, hypertension, muscle weakness, osteoporosis, patient's non-compliance with other medical treatment, urge incontinence, overactive bladder, nicotine dependence, osteoarthritis, adjustment disorder, dependence on supplemental oxygen, nicotine dependence, and insomnia. Review of her Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/16/25,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain a safe environment regarding the wheelchair ramp in the front of the building. This had the potential to affect all residents in wheelchairs who would potentially use the ramp. The facility identified 39 residents who used wheelchairs. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure the floor of the shower in the secured unit was free of broken tiles. This affected one (#63) of one reviewed for falls related to broken tiles. The facility census was 80. Findings include: 1. Observation on 09/23/24 at 8:22 A.M. revealed a gap of approximately five inches irregularly shaped exposing stone and grass growing from the gap of broken concrete at the top of the wheelchair ramp coming into the building. Wheelchair ramp is located to the right of the building off the front porch area. Several cracks and open areas in the concrete on the front porch area observed as well. Observation on 09/25/24 at 2:28 P.M. of Resident #12 being pushed in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident interview, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive care plans were completed concerning all care areas for residents. This affected five residents (#22, #41, #57, #71, and #130) out of 25 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 80. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #130 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #130 include polyneuropathy, gout, prostate cancer with metastasis to pelvic bone, and clostridium difficile, (c-diff). Review of Resident #130's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] was in progress at the time of survey. Review of Resident #130's hospital documents dated 09/12/24 revealed the resident had an indwelling catheter placed for the diagnosis of obstructive uropathy. Review of Resident #130's baseline care plan dated 09/20/24 revealed for the bladder assessment the resident was noted as having an indwelling catheter upon admission.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-26 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and review of the menu spreadsheet, the facility failed to provide adequate protein portions to residents on a mechanical soft diet. This affected 14 residents (#2, #3, #4, #6, #16, #17, #28, #32, #37, #43, #53, #63, #68, and #130) identified on a mechanical soft diet. The facility census was 80. Findings include: Observations during meal service on 09/25/24 beginning at 10:46 A.M. revealed [NAME] #206 plating meals using a green handled scoop for the mechanical soft pork loin. Interview and observation on 09/25/24 at approximately 12:00 P.M. with [NAME] #206 revealed the green handled scoop had no measurements, but [NAME] #206's understanding was it was a 3-ounce scoop. Interview and observation of the green handled scoop on 09/25/24 at 12:06 P.M. with Dietary Manager (DM) #198 confirmed the scoop had no measurements on it. Further observation of another green handled scoop, taken from the drawer, revealed it measured 2 and 2/3 ounces. Continued interview and observation of a website with DM #198 revealed the green handled scoop she purchased…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure staff used appropriate hand hygiene while preparing meals. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure the dish machine washed dishes at the proper temperature. This had the potential to affect all residents except two (#41 and #42) who were identified as receiving no food from the kitchen. The facility census was 80. Findings include: 1. Observations during meal service on 09/24/24 beginning at approximately 5:05 P.M. revealed [NAME] #202 wearing disposable gloves while plating roast beef sandwiches and cubed potatoes for the evening meal. [NAME] #202 held tongs in her right hand to pick up roast beef and used her left hand to place the beef onto a bun. [NAME] #202 then used her right hand to place cheese and lettuce on the bun, and her right hand to place lettuce on the bun. [NAME] #202 then used her right hand to scoop potatoes onto the plate, and used both hands to close the sandwich. Continued observation revealed [NAME] #202 changing her gloves without washing her hands.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-26 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a pest free environment. This had the potential to affect 35 residents (#2, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #11, #13, #14, #15, #16, #20, #21, #22, #23, #29, #30, #35, #37, #43, #45, #46, #47, #48, #55, #61, #63, #64, #68, #70, #72, #74, #180, #181, and #182) on the secured unit. The facility census was 80. Findings include: Observation on 09/23/24 at 11:18 A.M. of the secured unit dining room during the noon meal revealed two moths flying around the dining room. Observation on 09/23/24 at 1:21 P.M. during an interview with Resident #37 revealed a moth flying around his room. Observation and interview on 09/23/234 at 3:27 P.M. with a resident who wished to remain anonymous revealed the amount of moths bothered them. One moth was observed in the room at the time of the interview. Interview on 09/23/24 at 3:42 P.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #174), who routinely worked the secured unit, confirmed there were lots of moths throughout the building. LPN #174 was told the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and policy review. the facility failed to ensure weekly skin assessments were being completed thoroughly. This affected one resident (#71) of three residents reviewed for skin issues. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure treatments were completed as ordered and an order for suture removal was completed. This affected two residents (#23 and #29) of three residents reviewed for skin. The facility census was 80. Findings include: 1. Review of medical record for Resident #71 revealed an admission date of 07/11/24 with diagnoses including but not limited to type two diabetes, sepsis, bipolar disorder, cutaneous abscess of the buttock, and cutaneous abscess. Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact. The resident required supervision/touching assistance for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and bed mobility, transfers, and ambulation. Review of physician orders revealed keep area with drains on right buttock clean and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the facility policy, record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatments and services for residents with indwelling catheters. This affected one resident (#130) out of three residents reviewed for indwelling catheters. The facility census was 80. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #130 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #130 included polyneuropathy, gout, prostate cancer with metastasis to pelvic bone, and clostridium difficile, (c-diff). Review of Resident #130's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] was in progress at the time of survey. Review of Resident #130's hospital documents dated 09/12/24 revealed the resident had an indwelling catheter placed for the diagnosis of obstructive uropathy. Review of Resident #130's baseline care plan dated 09/20/24 revealed for the bladder assessment the resident was noted as having an indwelling catheter upon admission.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide pain medication for a resident per physician orders. This affected one resident (#33) out of five residents reviewed for medications. The facility census was 80. Findings include: Record review for Resident #33 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #33 included hemiplegia, facial weakness, aphasia, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and heart disease. Review of Resident #33's care plans dated 08/08/24 revealed a focus for risk for dental health problems due to missing, broken and carious teeth due to poor oral health and lack of professional dental care. Interventions include administer medications per physician order. Review of Resident #33's physician orders dated 09/19/24 revealed the resident was prescribed Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen 5-325 milligram (mg) every four hours as needed for tooth pain for three days. No other orders for pain medication was noted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 38 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interview, staff interview, and test tray, the facility failed to serve palatable meals. This affected two residents (#57 and #60) of two residents reviewed for meals. The facility was 80. Findings include: Review of a test tray on 09/25/24 at 11:55 A.M. with Registered Nurse #178 revealed a plate with roast pork loin, mashed potatoes, and broccoli. Gravy covered the mashed potatoes and pork loin. The broccoli was served in a separate bowl on the plate. The plate presentation was pleasing. The temperature of the food was warm. The pork was seasoned well and tender. The mashed potatoes were bland with very little flavor. Additionally, the gravy had minimal flavor. Further, the broccoli was cooked to an appropriate texture but was bland and unseasoned. RN #178 confirmed the mashed potatoes, gravy, and broccoli tasted bland and lacked seasoning. Interview on 09/25/24 at 12:23 P.M. with Resident #60 revealed she thought the mashed potatoes and gravy tasted bland. Interview on 09/25/24 at 12:26 P.M. with Resident #57 revealed she felt the mashed potatoes were not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observations staff and resident interviews and policy review the facility failed to ensure a residents dressing changes were completed per physician orders. This affected one (#20) out of three residents reviewed for skin breakdown. The facility census was 70. Findings include: Record review of Resident #20 revealed an admission date of 12/20/23. Diagnoses included complete traumatic amputation of left great toe, spina bifida, inflammatory polyneuropathy, paraplegia, osteomyelitis, non-pressure chronic ulcer, adult failure to thrive, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, pressure ulcer of unspecified site, major depressive disorder, opioid dependence, anorexia and stimulant abuse. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed on 01/01/24 revealed Resident #20 with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) with a score of 15 out of 15 indicating the resident was cognitively intact. Functional imitation in range of motion revealed no impairment both upper extremities, and impairment to both lower extremities. Further review of Resident #20's medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-22 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, review of a medication error report, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were transcribed and administered per the physician's order. This affected one (#20) out of three residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 70. Findings include: Record review of Resident #20 revealed an admission date of 12/20/23. Diagnoses included complete traumatic amputation of left great toe, spina bifida, inflammatory polyneuropathy, paraplegia, osteomyelitis, non-pressure chronic ulcer, adult failure to thrive, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, pressure ulcer of unspecified site, major depressive disorder, opioid dependence, anorexia and stimulant abuse. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed on 01/01/24 revealed Resident #20 with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) with a score of 15 out of 15 indicating the resident was cognitively intact. Functional imitation in range of motion revealed no impairment both upper extremities, and impairment to both lower extremities. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-22 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents received medication per the physician's orders resulting in three medication errors out of 25 opportunities or a 12 percent (%) medication error rate. This affected one (#32) out of two residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 70. Findings include: Record review of Resident #32 revealed an admission date of 02/29/24. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction due to embolism of right middle cerebral artery, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, coronary artery disease, major depressive disorder, personal history of transient ischemic attack (TIA), cerebral infarction, anxiety disorder, history of other venous thrombosis and embolism, history of traumatic brain injury, chronic pain syndrome, seizures, dementia and mood disturbance Observation on 03/22/24 at 8:54 A.M. of medication administration pass with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #210 revealed Resident #32 was administered the following…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, review of the Local Health Department Inspection, review of the dishwasher temperature logs, review of the dishwasher manufacture recommendations, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the dishwasher was at a temperature to properly sanitize dishes. This had the potential to affect all 70 residents who received food from the kitchen. The facility identified two residents who do not receive food from the kitchen. The facility census was 74. Findings include: Observation on 03/06/24 at 7:51 A.M. of the dishwasher in the kitchen revealed dishwasher model was AF 30 S. Specifications on label on dishwasher revealed wash 45 seconds, rinse 30 seconds and dwell 15 seconds. Recommended wash temperatures is 120 degrees Fahrenheit (F) minimum and 50 parts per million (PPM) of chlorine rinse. Rinse temperature is 120 degrees F minimum. Two compartment sink observed in the dish area and one compartment sink observed in the prep area. Observation on 03/06/24 at 8:13 A.M. revealed the dishwasher in the kitchen was in use and had a wash temperature of 66 degrees…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of policy, the facility failed to ensure the medical record contained accurate documentation regarding resident monitoring. This affected one (#14) of three residents reviewed for monitoring. The facility census was 67. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #14 revealed an admission date of 01/03/23 with diagnoses of encephalopathy, chronic pancreatitis, and need for assistance with personal care. Further review revealed Resident #14 was admitted to the hospital on [DATE] and remained out of the facility at the time of the survey conducted 12/18/23. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #14 had impaired cognition and did not exhibit physical, verbal, or other behaviors. Further review revealed Resident #14 was not on an anticoagulant. Continued review revealed Resident #14 received scheduled and as-needed pain medication. Review of the physician orders for Resident #14 revealed an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-04 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, policy review, local police detective interview, staff interviews, family interview, review of local newspaper article, and review of the Self-Reported Incident reporting website, the facility failed to timely report to the state agnecy allegations of mistreatment/neglect of a resident. This affected one (#1) of six residents reviewed for potential mistreatment/neglect. The current census is 69. Findings include: Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed and admission date of [DATE] and discharged on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #1 included: metabolic encephalopathy, diabetes type two, kidney disease, pulmonary edema, and acute respiratory failure. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition and was a one-person assist for Activities of Daily (ADL). Per the assessment the resident had not been diagnosed with any neurological disorders. Per the assessment the resident had been diagnosed with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-04 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, policy review, local police detective interview, staff interviews, family interview, review of local newspaper article, and review of the Self-Reported Incident reporting website, the facility failed to investigate allegations of mistreatment/neglect of a resident. This affected one (#1) of six residents reviewed for potential mistreatment/neglect. The current census is 69. Findings include: Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed and admission date of [DATE] and discharged on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #1 included: metabolic encephalopathy, diabetes type two, kidney disease, pulmonary edema, and acute respiratory failure. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition and was a one-person assist for Activities of Daily (ADL). Per the assessment the resident had not been diagnosed with any neurological disorders. Per the assessment the resident had been diagnosed with depression but no other…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-04 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, policy review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the medical records contained the name of the nurse who provided care and all assessments contained accurate information. This affected two (#1 and #4) residents of four resident medical records reviewed for accuracy. The current census is 69. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed and admission date of 05/31/23 and discharged on 11/27/23. Diagnoses for Resident #1 included: metabolic encephalopathy, diabetes type two, kidney disease, pulmonary edema, and acute respiratory failure. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition and was a one-person assist for Activities of Daily (ADL). Per the assessment the resident had not been diagnosed with any neurological disorders. Per the assessment the resident had been diagnosed with depression but no other psychiatric disorders. Review of Resident #1's care plans dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-09 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespreadEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, review of Resident Council meeting minutes, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure food was served at a safe and appetizing temperature. This had the potential to affect all 72 residents who received meals from the facility. The facility identified Resident #90 as receiving no food from the kitchen. The facility census was 73. Findings include: Interview on 08/09/23 at 5:46 A.M. with Resident #54 stated her meals are not hot when delivered to her room and she did not think it tasted very good. Interview on 08/09/23 at 6:31 A.M. with Registered Nurse (RN) #45 confirmed she was aware of resident complaints related to the food not taking good. Interview on 08/09/23 at 8:02 A.M. with Resident #14 stated her meals are not hot and the drinks are not always cold when delivered to her room. Resident #14 stated the meals usually did not taste good. Interview on 08/09/23 at 7:41 A.M. with Resident #48 stated his meals are always cold when delivered to his room and the drinks are not cold but cool to taste. Resident #48 also stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-05-09 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure Dietary Manager #232 had proper Safe Serve credentials. This had the potential to affect 73 residents who received meals from the kitchen. The facility census was 75. Findings include: Review of Dietary Managers #232 Serve Safe certificate revealed an expiration date of [DATE]. Interview on [DATE] at 09:44 A.M. Dietary Manager #232 verified her Serve Safe certificate was expired as of [DATE].
- Potential for harm · E2022-05-09 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents' Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurate. This affected six (#7, #32, #41, #53, #63, and #71) of 26 residents reviewed for MDS assessment accuracy. The facility census was 75. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #41 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnosis included schizophrenia, infection and inflammatory reaction due to indwelling urethral catheter, resistance to multiple antibiotics, unspecified asthma, sepsis due to escherichia coli, major depressive disorder recurrent, anxiety, paraplegia, muscle weakness, weakness, need for assistance with personal care, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, hypothyroidism, essential (primary) hypertension, sleep apnea, dependence on supplemental oxygen, autoimmune thyroiditis, and acute kidney failure. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/01/22, revealed the resident received an anticoagulant seven…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the care plan accurately reflected the care of five residents (#45, #53, #44, #41, and #73) out of five residents reviewed for accuracy of the care plan. The facility census was 75. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record of Resident #45 revealed an admission date of 02/26/18 with a diagnosis of neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed the presence of the indwelling urinary catheter. Review of the care plan revised on 05/02/22 revealed no mention of the indwelling urinary catheter with no interventions. Interview on 05/04/22 at 2:04 P.M. Regional Director of Clinical Operations #250 verified the care plan did not included the indwelling urinary catheter for Resident #45. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #53 revealed an admission date of 03/07/22 with a diagnosis of urinary tract infection (UTI). Resident #53…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-05-09 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident interview, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the appropriate/required members of the interdisciplinary team (IDT) were invited to participate in the care planning process. This affected five residents (#7, #31, #44, #53, and #73) of five residents reviewed for care planning. The facility census was 75. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #73 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnosis include quadriplegia, retention of urine, anorexia, urinary tract infection, muscle weakness, pressure ulcer of right buttock stage IV, pressure ulcer of other site stage IV, pressure ulcer of left heel unstageable, pressure ulcer of left hip stage IV, uninhibited neuropathic bladder, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, schizoaffective disorder, non-pressure chronic ulcer of right calf with unspecified severity, anemia, pressure ulcer of sacral region stage IV, non-pressure chronic ulcer of skin of other sites with unspecified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-09 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to issue a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) form prior to discharge. This affected one resident (#129) out of three residents reviewed for NOMNC notification. The facility census was 75. Findings include: Review of the closed medical record of Resident #129 revealed an admission date of 11/15/21 and a discharge, per his request, on 12/15/22. The record was silent for any NOMNC form being issued to him. Resident #129 left the facility prior to his last day of coverage. Interview on 05/04/22 at 10:02 A.M. with Minimum Data Set Nurse #201 revealed the facility had no documentation of Resident #129 having been issued a NOMNC before discharge. She added Resident #129 had left voluntarily but still should have received a NOMNC as the facility knew at least a week in advance of his departure and he would have days remaining.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-09 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to notify the resident/resident representative in writing of the reason for transfer/discharge to the hospital. Additionally, the facility failed to notify the ombudsman of the resident's transfer/discharge to the hospital. This affected one (#76) of one resident reviewed for hospitalization. The census was 75. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #76 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, opioid dependence, dependence on renal dialysis,, psychoactive substance use, pneumonia, schizophrenia, affective mood disorder, atrial fibrillation, major depression, severe protein calorie malnutrition. Review of the progress notes revealed Resident #76 was sent to the hospital on [DATE] at 3:00 P.M. for evaluation and treated related to blood and a large mass, dark in color, with no odor in the resident's bedpan. Continued review of a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-09 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident record review, staff interview, and policy review; the facility failed to notify the resident/resident representative of the facility's bed hold policy when a resident was transferred to the hospital. This affected one (#76)) of one resident record reviewed for hospitalization. The census was 75. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #76 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses include chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, opioid dependence, dependence on renal dialysis, psychoactive substance use, pneumonia, schizophrenia, affective mood disorder, atrial fibrillation, major depression, severe protein calorie malnutrition. Review of the progress notes revealed Resident #76 was sent to the hospital on [DATE] at 3:00 P.M. for evaluation and treated related to blood and a large mass, dark in color, with no odor in the resident's bedpan. Continued review of a progress note dated 02/27/22 at 3:11 P.M., revealed the resident was admitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident and staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide timely follow-up appointments and implement a treatment plan to include wound vac as ordered by the physician. This affected one resident (#58) of one resident reviewed for out of facility appointments and one resident(#73) of one resident reviewed for functional wound treatment equipment. The census was 75. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #58 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included unspecified fracture of fourth thoracic vertebra subsequent encounter for fracture with routine healing, infection following a procedure deep incisional site, methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus infections as the cause of disease classified elsewhere, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, and centrilobular emphysema. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Review of orthopedic specialist notes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-09 · tag F0773 — isolatedProvide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident record review and staff interview, the facility failed to timely notify the physician of abnormal laboratory results. This affected one (#7) of three residents reviewed for urinary tract infection. The census was 75. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #7 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic kidney disease, schizophrenia, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Review of a 5-day Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #7 had severe impaired cognition. The resident was dependent of one person for toileting and occasionally incontinent of urine. Review of the medical record for Resident #7 revealed the resident was admitted to the hospital for COPD exacerbation and hypoxia from 03/09/22 to 03/17/22. Review of a laboratory test, specimen collection date 03/09/22, revealed the resident had an abnormal urinalysis. The results were reported to the facility on [DATE] and included the sensitivity…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, review of a facility policy, and review of guidance from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the facility failed to ensure unvaccinated residents were quarantined following readmission. This affected two (#73 and #277) of two residents reviewed after readmission to the facility. The census was 75. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #73 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnosis include quadriplegia, retention of urine, anorexia, urinary tract infection, muscle weakness, pressure ulcer of right buttock stage IV, pressure ulcer of other site stage IV, pressure ulcer of left heel unstageable, pressure ulcer of left hip stage IV, non-pressure chronic ulcer of right calf with unspecified severity, anemia, pressure ulcer of sacral region stage IV, non-pressure chronic ulcer of skin of other sites with unspecified severity, pressure ulcer of right lower back stage IV, pressure ulcer of left lower back stage IV, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-09 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident record review, staff interview, review of infection surveillance documentation, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to implement antibiotic stewardship protocol to ensure appropriate antibiotic use. This affected one resident (#7) of three residents reviewed for urinary tract infection. The census was 75. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #7 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses include chronic kidney disease, schizophrenia, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Review of a 5-day minimum data set assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #7 had severe impaired cognition. The resident was dependent of one person for toileting and occasionally incontinent of urine. Review of a laboratory test, specimen collection date 03/09/22, revealed the resident had an abnormal urinalysis (UA). The results were reported to the facility on [DATE] and included the sensitivity results. Review of the laboratory test results…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2019-07-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespreadEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to ensure expired medications were disposed of according to manufacturer guidelines. The facility also failed to ensure medications and biologicals were properly secured. This affected one of two medication storage rooms and one intravenous medication storage cart and had the potential to affect all 76 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 76. Findings include: Observation of the facility medication storage room on the 500 hallway on 07/02/19 at 7:45 A.M. with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) #26 revealed two unopened full bottles (60 tablets) of Advanced Stress Formula Plus Zinc (supplement) with an expiration date of 10/2017, eight sixteen ounce bottles of Dioctyl Liquid (stool softener/laxative) with an expiration date of 03/2018, one four ounce bottle of Guaiasorb M (cough syrup) with an expiration date of 04/2018, one four ounce bottle of Guaiasorb M with an expiration date of 05/2019 and two bottles of Aspirin 325 milligrams (100 tablets) with an expiration…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2019-07-02 · tag F0868 — widespreadHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of sign-in sheets for Quality Assurance (QA) Meetings and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the Medical Director (MD) was present for the quarterly meetings. This had the potential to affect all 76 residents who resided in the facility. The census was 76. Findings include: Review of the QA quarterly meeting sign-in sheets dated 10/18/18, 12/11/18, 01/10/19, and 04/24/19 revealed there was not signature for the MD. Interview with the Administrator on 07/02/19 at 10:37 A.M. verified the MD didn't sign in for the QA meetings. The Administrator stated if he couldn't attend the QA meetings on the exact day the facility scheduled the meeting, we would have a meeting with him at a later date and go over, in detail what the meeting was about. The facility confirmed this had the potential to affect all 76 residents residing in the facility.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-07-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review staff interview and review of policy and procedures, the facility failed to have an adequate infection control surveillance program in place for tracking and trending infections to prevent possible outbreaks. This had the potential to affect all 76 residents residing in the building. Facility census was 76. Findings include: Review of the facility's infection control surveillance program revealed the facility was using a floor map will yellow high lighted areas. The highlight areas also lacked any identification of the organism to ensure tracking and trending was completed. Further review lacked any documentation/tracking of the residents name, pathogen/infection, requiring isolation or not, date of onset, signs or symptoms, treatment, nosocomial or not and outcome of the residents infection type. On 07/01/19 at 2:57 P.M. interview with Director of Nursing (DON) verified the facility did not have an effective infection control surveillance program in place to monitor, track and trend infections as required. The DON was also unable to ensure which type of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-07-02 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespreadImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, staff interview and review of policy and procedures, the facility failed to have a adequate antibiotic stewardship program in place to ensure antibiotics were prescribed for infections. This had the potential to affect all 76 residents residing in the facility. Facility census was 76. Findings include: Review of antibiotic stewardship information provided by the facility for (March/April/May 2019) documented residents names with antibiotic used, diagnosis, with some durations documented. The documentation was on a note book paper. Further review lacked dates the antibiotic were initiated, any culture results or documentation the antibiotics were reviewed to ensure it was prescribed properly to treat infections with outcome details. On 07/01/19 at 2:57 P.M. interview with Director of Nursing (DON) verified her antibiotic stewardship program was not effective and she was unable to produce enough information about the antibiotics prescribed to ensure they were being use properly to treat verified infections. The DON further revealed some residents come from the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-07-02 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of medical record for Resident #37 revealed an admission date of 04/04/18 with diagnosis including abnormal posture, muscle weakness, osteomyelitis of the vertebrae, sacral and sacrococcygeal region, heart failure, multiple sclerosis, colostomy status, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, anemia and hyperlipidemia. Review of Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #37 was cognitively intact with deficits assessed. Review of nursing notes dated 06/09/19 documented Resident #37 was discharge to the hospital on [DATE] due to a change of condition. Review of nurse notes dated 06/21/19 documented resident #37 was readmitted from the hospital. Review of entire medial record for Resident #37 lacked any documentation of written documentation being provided to the resident in an understandable language for the reason she was being discharged to the hospital. Further review also lacked any documentation of the office of the state long term care ombudsman being notified of the hospital…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-07-02 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of medical record for Resident #37 revealed an admission date of 04/04/18 with diagnosis including abnormal posture, muscle weakness, osteomyelitis of the vertebrae, sacral and sacrococcygeal region, heart failure, multiple sclerosis, colostomy status, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, anemia and hyperlipidemia. Review of Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #37 was cognitively intact with deficits assessed. Review of nursing notes dated 06/09/19 documented Resident #37 was discharge to the hospital on [DATE] due to a change of condition. Review of nurse notes dated 06/21/19 documented resident #37 was readmitted from the hospital. Review of entire medial record for resident #37 lacked any documentation of her receiving a bed hold policy notification in regards to her bed hold days remaining upon transfer to the hospital. 3. Medical record review for Resident #49 revealed he was admitted on [DATE]. Medical diagnoses included heart failure, peripheral vascular disease,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-07-02 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — patternMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure call lights were installed in bathrooms accessible to residents in the 300 hallway. This had the potential to affect 16 (#222, #58, #54, #48, #25, #59, #6, #68, #172, #52, #61, #45, #33, #64, #2 and #18) who resided on the 300 hall and that could access the bathroom located on the 300 hallway. The facility census was 76. Findings include: Observation on 06/30/19 at 9:10 A.M. of the bathrooms near the 300 hall nurses station found the bathroom door unlocked, opened and had no call light installed in the bathroom. Two independently mobile residents were observed outside the open door of the bathroom. Interview on 06/30/19 at 9:15 A.M. with Housekeeping Staff (HS) #15 revealed the unmarked bathroom was considered the women's bathroom but anyone could use it. HS #15 reported the bathroom was kept unlocked. Observation on 06/30/19 at 10:09 A.M. of the women's bathroom near the 300 hall nurses station found the bathroom door unlocked and no call light installed in the bathroom. An…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-07-02 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview and review of a facility policies, the facility failed to ensure the facility was maintained in good repair. This affected seven (#4, #46, #20, #31, #17, #29 and #69) out of 76 residents room observed during the survey. The facility census was 76. Findings included: Observations during the initial pool on 06/30/19 from 8:00 A.M. through 12:00 P.M. revealed Resident #4's wall behind the head of the bed to have damaged drywall with deep gouges to the surface of the wall. Resident #4's bathroom was a shared bathroom with Resident #46, #20 and #31 and had damaged drywall indicated by torn strips of dry wall next to the soap dispenser on the wall near the sink. Observation of Resident #17's bathroom revealed it to be a shared bathroom with Resident #29 and #69 with damaged drywall indicated by torn strips of dry wall next to the soap dispenser on the wall near the sink. Resident #17, #29 and #69's bathroom wall to the left side of the toilet was observed to have a brown dried splattered substance to the lower wall. Interview on 07/01/19 at 7:50 A.M.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-07-02 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were afforded their right to dignity when covers were not in place over indwelling foley (urinary) catheter bags for Resident #37 and #49. This affected two (#37 and #49) of three residents reviewed for catheters. The facility identified there were four indwelling foley catheters. The census was 76. Findings included: 1. Medical record review for Resident #37 revealed an admission date of 04/04/18. Medical diagnoses included heart failure, deep vein thrombosis, multiple sclerosis, and neurogenic bladder. Review of annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed she was cognitively intact. Functional status was total dependence for bed mobility, transfer, toilet use and eating was supervision. She was coded for an indwelling foley catheter. Observation was made of Resident #37 on 06/30/19 at 1:11 P.M. revealed she was sitting in the hallway in her wheelchair with her indwelling…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-07-02 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure proper paperwork was completed for advance directive for Resident #37. This affected one (#37) out of 24 reviewed for advanced directives. The facility census was 76. Findings included: Medical record review for Resident #37 revealed an admission date of 04/04/18. Medical diagnoses included heart failure, deep vein thrombosis, multiple sclerosis, and neurogenic bladder. Review of annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Functional status was total dependence for bed mobility, transfer, toilet use and eating was supervision. Review of electronic medical record for Resident #37 revealed she was a Do Not Resuscitate Arrest (DNR-Arrest). Further review of hard chart for Resident #37 revealed it was silent for proper paperwork for a DNR-Arrest. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #49 on 06/30/19 at 3:45 P.M. verified there was no paperwork in Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-07-02 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure there was a baseline care plan initiated for Resident #173 for indwelling foley (urinary) catheter care. This affected one (#173) of six reviewed for 48-hour baseline care plans. The census was 76. Findings included: Medical record review for Resident #173 revealed an admission date of 06/20/19. Diagnoses included malignant neoplasm of colon. Review of admission observation dated 06/20/19 revealed she was cognitively intact. Functional status was independent for bed mobility, transfers, eating and toilet use. Review of 48-hour baseline care plans revealed they were silent to a care plan for indwelling foley catheter care. Observation of Resident #173 on 06/30/19 at 11:22 A.M. revealed she had a indwelling foley catheter. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #6 on 07/01/19 at 2:05 P.M. verified there wasn't a 48-hour care plan for Resident #173 and there should have been.
- Potential for harm · D2019-07-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were properly position for meals. This affected two (#16 and #17) of two residents randomly observed for positioning while eating. The facility census was 68. Findings include: Observation on 08/20/19 at 11:32 A.M., revealed Resident #16 and Resident #17 were observed sitting in their beds, slouched down where the bed bends with the head of the bed elevated. The over the bed tray table was placed over top over each resident. Resident #16 and Resident #17 were observed trying to lift their heads up off the bed so they could see and reach their lunch meal. Review of the medical record for Resident #16 revealed an admission date of 04/30/18. Diagnoses include essential hypertension, muscle weakness, type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, schizophrenia, iron deficiency anemia and acute kidney failure. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #16 had moderate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-07-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interview, medical record review and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a resident's blood sugars was obtained to ensure insulin was administered as ordered prior to residents consuming breakfast. This affected one (#64) of six reviewed for medications. The facility identified six residents who received morning insulin prior to breakfast. The facility census was 76. Findings include: Review of Resident #64's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/30/19. Diagnoses included heart disease, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, hypothyroidism, type II diabetes, anemia, cirrhosis of the liver, epilepsy, peripheral vascular disease, and dementia. Review of Resident #64's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of nine indicating Resident #64 was moderately cognitively impaired. Resident #64 required supervision for bed mobility, transfer, walking, locomotion, dressing, eating,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-07-02 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview and review of policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure a resident received a splint device and passive range of motion (PROM) services as recommended by therapy to ensure the current level of function was maintained. This affected one (#12) out of two resident reviewed for positioning and mobility. The facility identified 12 resident currently residing in the facility with contractures. Facility census was 76. Findings included: Review of medical record for Resident #12 revealed an admission date of 02/25/19 with diagnosis including contracture of unspecified joint, dysphagia, heart failure, chronic kidney disease, difficulty walking, dementia with behavioral disturbances, hypertension and schizophrenia. Review of Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #12 was assessed as moderately cognitively impaired. Further review documented he had no function limitation to his bilateral upper extremities affecting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-07-02 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff and resident interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure there were physician orders the use of indwelling foley (urinary) catheters and failed to ensure catheter care was completed for Resident #49 and #173. Additionally, the facility also failed to have interventions in place for Resident #49's indwelling foley catheter care. This affected two (#49 and #173) of four reviewed for indwelling foley catheters. The census was 76. Findings include: 1. Medical record review for Resident #49 revealed he was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses include heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, Non-Alzheimer's and neurogenic bladder. Review of quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #49 was cognitively impaired. His functional status was extensive assistance for bed mobility, transfers, supervision for eating and total dependence for toilet use. He was coded for a indwelling foley catheter. Review of physician orders from 01/01/19 to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-07-02 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident and staff interview, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to ensure nutritional recommendations were implemented as recommended by the registered dietitian. This affected one (#41) out of three residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 76. Findings include: Review of Resident #41's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/27/17. Diagnoses included urethritis, extrapyramidal movement disorder, embolism and thrombosis of unspecified vein, osteoarthritis, incompatibility reaction due to transfusion of blood products, abdominal hernia, nicotine dependence, asthma, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, type two diabetes mellitus, obstructive sleep apnea, overactive bladder, post-traumatic stress disorder, gastroesophageal reflux disorder, symbolic dysfunctions, epileptic seizures, schizophrenia, hypertension, dysphagia, pancreatitis, and flaccid hemiplegia of the left side. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-07-02 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolatedEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interview, medical record review and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure resident's were provided diets as ordered. This affected one (#25) out of two residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility identified eight residents who received pureed diets. The facility census was 76. Findings included: Review of Resident #25's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/30/18. Diagnoses included anemia, difficulty walking, muscle weakness, hypertension, type II diabetes, schizophrenia, acute kidney failure, osteomyelitis of vertebra, and colostomy status. Review of Resident #25's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 indicating Resident #25 was moderately cognitively impaired. Resident #25 required extensive assistance with bed mobility, locomotion, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene. Resident #25 was totally dependent for transfer and required supervision for eating.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$33,534 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $33,534 — penalty dated 2025-03-11
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CARECORE HEALTH — 10 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.1 | +0.9 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 1.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 1.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
The other 9 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.1★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| CUSTOMERS BANK | Organization | 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST | since 08/14/2020 |
| HERTANU, JOSEPH | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2019 |
| CARECORE HEALTH LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2019 |
| HANNA, SALIM | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2025 |
| HERTANU, CHAIM | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2019 |
| HOPSON, VAUGHN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2019 |
| FASTEN HALBERSTAM LLP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2019 |
| LIMA ACRES REALTY, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2019 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $480K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365202. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-09-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.