No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Lakeridge Villa Health Care Center

7220 Pippin Rd, Cincinnati, OH 45239 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 99 certified beds · (513) 729-2300 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (513) 729-2300 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0607, F0609) — most recent Apr 2019
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (40) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (69%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
5944 Colerain Ave · (513) 385-4757 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walgreens0.8 mi
3084 W Galbraith Rd · (513) 521-4531 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
ALDI0.6 mi
2550 W Galbraith Rd · (630) 879-8100 · Call to confirm hours
Park
6409 Simpson Ave · (513) 522-1410 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased2.9%5.3%15.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight8.2%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms97.8%30.1%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.8%3.2%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened2.1%6.1%16.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication28.3%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.8%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.8%3.4%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control19.0%21.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table22.1%8.8%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine7.4%75.6%79.4%worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.25U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.11hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 34% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.991.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.27
RN hours/ resident / day
1.13
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.69
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.09
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.15
RN hoursweekends
69.4%
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 85.9 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.09 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.27 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.69 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.79 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.21 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.32 to 0.15 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 69% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

9
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-03-06)
22
at the previous standard inspection (2022-03-18)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

40 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 30 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0576 — isolated
    Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, resident interview, observation, staff interview, review of the facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were able to have private phone conversations. This affected two (Residents #5 and #83) of 18 residents sampled for communication. The facility census was 90 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident # 5 revealed an admission date of 04/19/23 with diagnoses including heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), morbid obesity, type two diabetes, and paranoid schizophrenia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #5 dated 01/03/25 revealed the resident had moderately impaired cognition. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident # 83 revealed an admission date of 10/03/24 with diagnoses including quadriplegia, incomplete paraplegia, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, adjustments disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood, and osteomyelitis. Review of the MDS assessment for Resident #83 dated 11/27/24 revealed the resident was cognitively intact.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to notify resident representatives of a change in condition. This affected one (Resident #87) of two residents reviewed for change in condition. The facility census was 90 residents. Findings include: Review of the closed medical record for Resident #87 revealed an admission date of 07/25/11 with diagnoses including Parkinson's Disease, dementia without behavioral disturbance, and schizoaffective disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #87 dated 11/07/24 revealed the resident #87 had severely impaired cognition and required staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs.) Review of the progress note for Resident #87 dated 01/05/25 revealed the resident had remained in bed for the last two days, refused food, and had minimal fluid intake. The note did not include documentation the resident's guardian had been informed of the change in condition. Interview on 03/06/25 at 11:04 A.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the facility staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility staff failed to ensure the accuracy of comprehensive resident assessments. This affected one (Resident #55) of four residents reviewed for comprehensive assessments. The facility had a census of 90 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #55 revealed an admission date of 08/10/24 with diagnoses including end stage renal disease, diabetes, and chronic pulmonary obstructive disease (COPD) Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #55 dated 01/23/25 revealed the resident required substantial to maximum assistance with toileting, bathing, and upper and lower body dressing. Interview on 03/03/25 at 4:30 P.M. with Resident #55 confirmed he was independent with toileting, bathing, and dressing. Resident #55 further confirmed he had experienced occasional episodes of weakness and fatigue following dialysis and the staff monitored showers if taken after…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to appropriately revise care plans. This affected one (Resident #85) of three residents sampled for smoking. The facility census was 90 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident # 85 revealed an admission date of 01/09/25 with diagnoses including rheumatoid arthritis, unspecified mental disorder, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of the smoking safety evaluation for Resident #85 dated 01/09/25 revealed the resident was able to hold, light, and extinguish a cigarette safely. Review of care plan for Resident #85 dated 01/15/25 revealed the resident had a potential for injury related to smoking cigarettes. Interventions included the following: complete smoking assessments quarterly and with significant change, observe clothing daily for burn holes, secure cigarettes and lighters at the nurses' station, staff to check room regularly for cigarettes and lighters. Review of smoking safety evaluation for Resident #85…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors. This affected one (Resident #53) of five residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 90 residents. Findings include: Review the medical record for Resident #53 revealed an admission date of 10/04/21 with diagnoses including encephalopathy, depression, anxiety, acute kidney failure, urine retention, and alcohol abuse. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #53 dated 02/07/25 revealed the resident had no cognitive deficits and required minimal assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of the physician's orders for Resident #53 revealed an order dated 08/24/24 for Lexapro 15 milligrams (mg) one time per day. Observation of medication administration for Resident #53 on 03/05/25 at 8:21 A.M. per Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #38 revealed the nurse administered Lexapro 7.5 mg to the resident. Interview on 03/05/25 at 11:52 A.M. with LPN #38…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0800 — isolated
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, and staff interview the facility failed to provide resident diets in accordance with the physician's orders and resident preference. This affected one (Resident #192) of five residents reviewed for food. The facility census was 90 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #192 revealed an admission date of 02/19/25 with diagnoses including diabetes, mild intellectual disability, and bilateral below the knee amputations. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #192 revealed an order dated 02/27/25 for the resident to receive double portions of food due to weight loss. Review of meal ticket dated for Resident #192 dated 03/03/25 revealed the resident was to receive double portions of country chicken and dumplings, peas and carrots, cornbread, and cake. Interview on 03/03/25 at 10:09 A.M. with Resident #192 confirmed he was supposed to be getting double portions on his trays, but he only received small portions, and it was not enough food for him. Observation of Resident #192's dinner…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure staff properly secured their hair while serving resident meals. This affected two (Residents #70 and #1) of 17 residents observed for meal service. The facility census was 90 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #70 revealed an admission date of 11/15/23 with diagnoses including dementia, congestive heart failure, and chronic kidney disease. Review of the medical record for Resident #1 revealed an admission date of 02/01/25 with diagnoses including dementia, diabetes mellitus type two, osteoarthritis, and peripheral vascular disease. Observation on 03/05/25 at 5:17 P.M. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #30 was serving meal trays to Residents #70 and #1. LPN #30 had long hair which was unsecured and falling into the residents' meal trays. Interview on 03/05/25 at 5:32 P.M. with LPN #30 confirmed her long hair was unsecured and had fallen onto the plates of Residents #70 and #1. Review of facility policy titled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical review, observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure nurses properly documented administration of narcotic medications. This affected three Residents (#14, #32, and #67) of three residents reviewed for medication reconciliation. The facility census was 90 residents. Findings include: 1.Review of the medical record for Resident #14 revealed an admission date of 08/12/13 with diagnoses including right femur fracture, malnutrition, personality disorder, and anxiety. Review of the controlled substance count sheet for Resident #14 revealed there were three doses of Tramadol remaining. Observation on 03/05/25 at 11:04 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #30 revealed there were only two doses of Resident #14's Tramadol in the cart. Interview on 03/05/25 at 11:04 A.M. with LPN #30 confirmed she had given a dose of Tramadol to Resident #14 earlier in the day on 03/05/25 but had not documented administration of the medication. 2.Review of the medical record for Resident #32 revealed an admission date of 12/5/23 with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure staff donned appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) when providing direct care to residents in enhanced barrier precautions (EBP). This affected one (Resident #83) of three residents observed for EBP. The facility census was 90 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #83 revealed an admission date of on 10/03/24 with diagnoses including unspecified quadriplegia, incomplete paraplegia, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, and osteomyelitis. Review of care plan for Resident #83 dated 10/07/24 revealed the resident was in EBP due to active wounds, indwelling catheter, and colostomy. Interventions include to educate the resident and family on use of EBP and proper PPE and to post EBP signage on the resident's door. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #83 dated 11/27/24 revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Review of care plan for Resident #83 dated 12/09/24 revealed the resident had an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review, policy review, resident interview, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision was provided to maintain safety and prevent potential injury during smoke breaks for one (#02) of seven sampled residents. The facility further failed to ensure staff completed a smoking safety evaluation for one (#01) of seven sampled residents. The faciliy census was 91. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #01's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/02/24. Resident #01's diagnoses included: end stage renal disease, dependence on renal dialysis, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), depression, anxiety, obstructive sleep apnea, congestive heart failure, heart attack, and stroke. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/07/24, revealed Resident #01 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS revealed Resident #01 used tobacco during the assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 30 citations
  • Potential for harm · F2024-05-07 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the menu, review of the substitution log, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the menu was followed. This affected all 90 residents who received meals from the kitchen. Resident #13 received no food by mouth. The facility census was 91. Findings include: Review of the breakfast menu, dated 05/06/24, revealed residents on a regular diet were to be served six ounces of hot or cold cereal, a number sixteen scoop or two ounces of cheesy scrambled eggs, and one slice of toast. Residents on a mechanical diet were to be served six ounces of hot or cold cereal, a number sixteen scoop or two ounces of cheesy scrambled eggs, and one slice of toast. Residents on a pureed diet were to be served six ounces of pureed cereal, a number sixteen scoop or two ounces of pureed cheesy scrambled eggs, and a number sixteen scoop or two ounces of pureed toast. Review of the substitution log from 02/23/24 to 05/06/24 revealed English muffins as a substitution for toast was not on the substitution log. Observation of Dietary Manager (DM) #68…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a sanitary manner and the dishwasher had the appropriate level of chemicals in order to prevent foodborne illness. This had the potential to affect all 90 residents who received meals from the kitchen. Resident #13 received no food by mouth. The facility census was 91. Findings include: 1. Observation of the kitchen on 05/06/24 at 8:15 A.M. revealed there were food debris built up in the oil and on the edges of the fryer. There was also food debris on the fryer basket and a brown splatter on the side of the fryer. There was brown water on the floor of the kitchen on the opposite side of the steam table where food was served during tray line. Interview with Dietary Manager (DM) #68 on 05/06/24 at 8:15 A.M. verified there was food debris built up in the oil, food basket and on the edges of the fryer. DM #68 also confirmed there was brown splatter on the side of the fryer and brown water on the floor of the kitchen on the opposite side of the steam table where food was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-03-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure food items were stored in a sanitary manner, the ice machine was kept in a sanitary manner and food items were held at the proper temperature. This affected all residents except Resident #9 that received no food by mouth. The facility census was 94. Findings include: Observation of the facility's ice machine located outside of the kitchen doors on 03/07/22 at 7:36 A.M. revealed there to be a brown and red substance on the white ledge on the inside of the ice machine. Further observation of the kitchen revealed [NAME] #347 took a paper towel and wiped the white ledge of the ice machine and the brown and red substance came off the inside of the ice machine and onto the paper towel. Interview with [NAME] #347 on 03/07/22 at 7:36 A.M. verified there was a brown and red substance on the inside of the ice machine. Observation of the kitchen on 03/08/22 at 4:45 P.M. revealed Dietary Manager #306 to take the temperature of the pureed soup on the tray line. The pureed soup was 120 degrees Fahrenheit (F).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-03-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, staff interview, review of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to perform proper hand hygiene during a dressing change for a pressure ulcer. This affected one (Resident #23) of four facility-identified residents with pressure ulcers. The facility also failed to implement quarantine precautions for Resident #486 which had the potential to affect all of the residents residing in the facility. The facility also failed to ensure staff performed appropriate hand hygiene while serving the resident meals which affected seven residents (Resident #16, #30, #55, #57, #75, #83, and #536). The facility census was 94. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #23 revealed an admission date of 04/15/99 with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis (MS) and diabetes mellitus (DM). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #23 was cognitively impaired and was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility's policy, observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to residents were treated in a dignified manner. This affected three (#8, #35, and #50) of four residents reviewed for dignity. The facility census was 94. Findings include: 1. Review of the Resident #50's medical record revealed Resident #50 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included aphasia, altered mental status, unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, schizoaffective disorder, and major depressive disorder. Review of Resident #50's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired. Review of Resident #50's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for March 2022 revealed Resident #50 had a regular diet with mechanical soft texture and thickened liquids. Observations of Resident #50's room on 03/07/22 at 11:24 A.M. and on 03/08/22 at 3:45 P.M. revealed a sign on Resident #50's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-03-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, resident interview, and review of facility policy and documents, the facility failed to ensure resident rooms and common areas on the second floor of the facility were clean and sanitary. This affected Residents #10, #23, #26, #55, #62, and #77. This had potential to affect all 44 residents who resided on the second floor. The facility census was 94. Findings include: Observation on 03/07/22 at 8:02 A.M. revealed the floors in the hallways and common areas on the second floor has visible debris, stains, and were sticky throughout. The trash receptacles in the dining area where residents were seated and awaiting breakfast were overflowing with waste which was spilling onto the floor. Interview on 03/07/22 at 8:02 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #353 confirmed the floors in the hallways and the dining area were dirty and needed to be cleaned and the trash was overflowing. LPN #353 confirmed she didn't think they had housekeeping staff over the weekend. Interview on 03/07/22 at 8:07 A.M. with Floor Technician (FT) #334 confirmed he worked…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-03-18 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's pharmacy recommendations were addressed in a timely manner. This affected five (#26, #40, #49, #53, and #71) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 94. Findings include: 1. Review of the Resident #71's medical record revealed Resident #71 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including vascular dementia without behavioral disturbance, major depressive disorder, and generalized anxiety disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #71 was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #71's pharmacy recommendation dated 01/08/22 revealed Resident #71 was on Buspirone 10 milligrams (mg) twice a day for depression and Sertraline 50 milligrams daily for depression. The pharmacy recommendation stated a dose evaluation was due per regulations and to please evaluate the continued need and consider a dose…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-03-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to secure a medication room on the second floor. This had potential to affect all 44 residents who resided on the second floor. The facility also failed to ensure prescription medications were properly stored and labeled with dates. This affected eight residents (#23, #30, #40, #48, #51, #53, #58, and #77). The facility also failed to ensure medication carts were locked when unattended. This had the potential to affect all 50 residents who resided on the first floor. The facility censes was 94. Findings included: 1. During an observation of the second floor medication room on 03/07/22 at 8:00 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #353 revealed the door was unsecured. Further observation revealed a magnetic across the door lock assembly and paper stuffed in the door lock opening. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #353 on 03/07/22 at 8:01 A.M. verified the medication door was unsecured. LPN #353 stated the door should always be secure and additionally stated the night shift…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-03-18 · tag F0807 — failed to offer suitable drinks — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides drinks consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to provide drinks per resident preference. This affected four residents (Resident #25, #62, #85, and #536) of 93 residents who received drinks with meals. The facility census was 94. Findings: An observation of breakfast trays being passed on 03/07/22 at 8:30 A.M. revealed coffee was not being served. Resident #25 was observed at 8:35 A.M. requesting coffee and was told by State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #342 there was no coffee available. At 8:48 A.M., Resident #62 also requested coffee. During an interview on 03/09/22 at 8:39 A.M., STNA #342 reported she had asked the kitchen for coffee for the resident's breakfast and was told they had run out. An observation on 03/07/22 at 12:17 P.M., revealed Resident #85 asked an unidentified staff member for coffee. The unidentified staff member stated there was no coffee available for the residents to have with their lunch meal. An interview on 03/07/22 at 1:58 P.M. with Resident #536 confirmed coffee was not available with the breakfast and lunch meal, and he was upset because he…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-18 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview and review of the facility's policy, the failed to ensure when a resident formulated an advanced directive, the resident's advanced directive was accurately recorded in all locations of the medical record to ensure the resident's wishes would be followed as directed in the event of an emergency. This affected three (Residents #26, #40 and #489) of 18 residents reviewed for advance directives. The facility census was 94. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for the Resident #26 revealed an admission date of 12/08/20. Diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, bradycardia, congestive heart failure, cardiomyopathy, atherosclerotic heart disease (ASHD), acute kidney disease, dementia, psychosis, hemiplegia, cardiomyopathy, contracture of left hand, cardiac implants, mental disorder, and moderate protein calorie malnutrition. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #26 was cognitively intact. Review of the plan of care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-18 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to ensure staff notified the resident's representative of seizure activity and the resident's transfer to the hospital. This affected one (Resident #49) of three residents reviewed for notification of change in condition. The facility census was 94. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #49 revealed an admission date of 07/20/21 with a diagnosis of seizure disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #49 was cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance of one staff with activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of the face sheet for Resident #49 revealed Resident #49 had a family representative who was designated as her emergency contact. Review of the nursing progress note for Resident #49 dated 01/22/22 revealed Resident #49 had a seizure starting at 5:28 P.M. Resident #49 was sitting in her wheelchair and the nurse called 911 and Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-18 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was completed within 14 days of admission. This affected three (#486, #487, and #489) of four residents reviewed for new admission to the facility. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #486 revealed an admission date of 02/24/22. Diagnoses included hemiplegia affecting right dominant side, gastro-esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis, essential hypertension, hypothyroidism, and hyperlipidemia. Review of the medical record revealed an admission MDS assessment had not yet been completed. Interview on 03/10/22 at 11:48 A.M. with Assistant Regional Director of Clinical Operations (ARDCO) #400 verified Resident #486's MDS assessment was not completed by the fourteenth day following her admission. 2. Review of the medical record of Resident #487 revealed an admission date of 02/17/22. Diagnoses included partial traumatic amputation of right great toe, essential hypertension, anxiety, disorder, post-traumatic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record review, review of facility policy, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident's who required assistance from staff received assistance with personal hygiene. The facility failed to ensure the resident's fingernails were trimmed and clean and ensure female residents did not have facial hair. This affected three (#23, #71, and #72) of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL). The facility identified 91 residents who require assistance with one or more ADL tasks. The facility census was 94. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record of Resident #72 revealed an admission date of 06/14/19. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction due to unspecified occlusion or stenosis of right anterior cerebral artery, morbid obesity, left hand contracture, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #72 had intact cognition. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to ensure the staff changed the resident's peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line dressings as ordered by the attending physician. This affected one (Resident #487) of one facility-identified residents with PICC lines. The facility census was 94. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #487 revealed an admission date of 02/17/22 with a diagnosis of osteomyelitis. Review of the admitting physician orders for Resident #487 revealed an order to change the dressing to resident's PICC line weekly and as needed. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) and Treatment Administration Record (TAR) from 02/17/22 to 03/06/22 for Resident #487 revealed the dressing change to resident's PICC line was not documented as being completed. Observation on 03/07/22 at 11:24 A.M. of Resident #487 revealed resident had a PICC line to her right arm with a dressing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, staff interview, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to provide dressing changes to a pressure ulcer as ordered by the physician. This affected one (Resident #9) of four facility-identified residents with pressure ulcers. The facility census was 94. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #9 revealed an admission date of 03/30/21 with a diagnosis of cerebral infarction. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/18/22, revealed Resident #9 was cognitively impaired and was totally dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of the wound physician note for Resident #9 dated 03/02/22 revealed the resident had an unstageable pressure ulcer (slough and/or eschar: known but not stageable due to coverage of wound bed by slough and/or eschar) to his right heel which measured 2.3 centimeters (cm) by 2.7 centimeters. Review of the physician orders for Resident #9 revealed an order dated 03/03/22 to cleanse the pressure ulcer to the right heel with normal saline or sterile water,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation of a resident's falls. The facility also failed to ensure a resident who was ordered bed rails, had the bed rails in place. This affected one (Resident #26) of two residents the facility identified as having bed rails ordered. This affected one (Resident #290) of five residents reviewed for accidents and falls. The facility census was 94. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #290 revealed an admission date of 03/03/22. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction. Review of the admission assessment for Resident #290 dated 03/03/22 revealed the resident was alert and oriented to person place and time with periods of confusion. Resident #290 required limited assistance of staff with activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of the fall risk assessment for Resident #290 dated 03/04/22 revealed resident was at high risk for falls. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-18 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure staff labeled and dated tube feeding solution and syringe used for tube feeding. This affected one (Resident #9) of four residents with tube feedings. The facility census was 94. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #9 revealed an admission date of 03/30/21 with a diagnosis of cerebral infarction. Review of the tube feeding order for Resident #9 dated 12/04/21 revealed an order for Fiber Source 75 milliliters (ml) per hour continuous and flush with 150 ml of water every four hours. Observation on 03/07/22 at 1:41 P.M. of Resident #9 revealed a bag of tube feeding was infusing via tube feeding pump at 75 ml per hour and bag was not labeled regarding contents of tube feeding bag or date the tube feeding was hung. Further observation revealed the piston syringe used for medication administration via tube was at resident's bedside and was not dated when opened. Interview on 03/07/22 at 1:41 P.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #353 confirmed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents received medications as prescribed by the physician. This affected one (#486) of five resident reviewed for medications. The facility census was 94. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #486 revealed an admission date of 02/24/22. Diagnoses included hemiplegia affecting right dominant side and gastro-esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis. Review of the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score dated 02/25/22 revealed Resident #486 had intact cognition. Review of Resident #486 physician's orders, dated 03/04/22 at 5:55 A.M., revealed an order for Penicillin V Potassium tablet (antibiotic)-500 milligrams (mg) every six hours for infection for seven days. Review of the March 2022 medication administration record (MAR) revealed Resident #486 received the first dose of the antibiotic on 03/07/22 at 12:00 P.M. Interview on 03/07/22 at 8:19 A.M. with Resident #486 stated she obtained a script for an antibiotic for a tooth…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-18 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to ensure the resident's received their medications without any significant medication errors. Resident #442 did not receive his anti-seizure medication, Vimpat and Resident #290 did not receive her MS Contin (a strong prescription paid medication). This affected one (Resident #442) of three facility identified residents with orders for Vimpat and one (Resident #290) of one facility-identified residents with orders for MS Contin. The facility census was 94. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #442 revealed an admission date of 02/28/22 with a diagnosis of encephalopathy and acute respiratory failure with hypoxia. Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #442 dated 03/02/22 revealed the resident had a death in the facility. Review of the admitting orders for Resident #442 dated 02/28/22 revealed an order for the anti-seizure medication, Vimpat, to be administered twice daily…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-18 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observation, record review, and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received routine dental services. This affected one (#6) of two residents reviewed for dental care. The facility census was 94. Findings include: Review of Resident #6's medical record revealed Resident #6 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included schizoaffective disorder, major depressive disorder, fibromyalgia, and muscle weakness. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #6 was cognitively intact and Resident #6 required limited with personal hygiene. Resident #6 also required supervision with eating and Resident #6 had no mouth pain or difficulty chewing. Review of Resident #6's dental care plan dated 06/15/21 revealed Resident #6 had missing teeth and complained of trouble with chewing her food. Resident #6 would like her teeth pulled and to be fitted for dentures. Interventions included dental or oral exams…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-18 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, medical record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the resident was provided the correct diet as ordered. This affected one (Resident #26) of the 10 residents who was ordered a puree diet. The facility census was 94. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #26 revealed an admission date of 12/08/20. Diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, dementia, cerebral vascular accident (CVA/stroke) with hemiplegia, and moderate protein calorie malnutrition. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #26 was cognitively intact, had no behaviors, and did not reject care. Review of the plan of care for Resident #26 revealed the resident had a swallowing impairment, had potential for aspiration, choking, swallowing difficulties and the resident had an alteration in completing required activities of daily living (ADLs). Interventions included to provide ordered puree diet/honey thick liquids. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure staff documented intravenous (IV) medications administered. This affected one (Resident #487) of 19 residents reviewed for medical record accuracy. The facility census was 94. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #487 revealed an admission date of 02/17/22 with a diagnosis of osteomyelitis. Review of the admitting physician orders, dated 02/17/22, revealed an order for Resident #487 to receive the intravenous (IV) antibiotic Ertapenem once daily until 03/24/22. Review of the February and March Medication Administration Records (MARs) for Resident #487 revealed the following daily doses of Ertapenem were not documented as given on the four following dates: 02/21/22, 02/26/22, 03/03/22, and 03/04/22. Interview on 03/08/22 at 4:17 P.M. with the Assistant Regional Director of Clinical Operations (ARDCO) #600 confirmed the doses of IV antibiotic for Resident #487 for 02/21/22, 02/26/22, 03/03/22, and 03/04/22 doses were not documented as completed. ARDCO #600…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-18 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, review of facility policy, observations, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents had call lights. This affected two residents (#9 and #60) of 24 residents reviewed for call lights. The facility census was 94. Findings include: 1. Review of the Resident #60's medical record revealed Resident #60 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included muscle weakness, vascular dementia with behavioral disturbance, contracture of the left hand and contracture of the left knee. Review of Resident #60's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #60 was severely cognitively impaired and Resident #60 required extensive assistance for bed mobility, dressing, and personal hygiene. Resident #60 required total dependence for transfers and toileting and limited assistance for eating. Review of the care plan for Resident #60 dated 02/09/22 revealed resident was at risk for falls. Interventions included to keep call light within reach and encourage…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-18 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility's policy, observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's oxygen tank was stored in a secured manner. This affected one (#71) of nine residents that used oxygen at the facility. The facility census was 94. Findings include: Review of Resident #71's medical record revealed Resident #71 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included congestive heart failure, acute respiratory failure and vascular dementia without behavioral disturbance. Review of Resident #71's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #71 was cognitively intact and Resident #71 required extensive with dressing, toileting, bed mobility, transfers and personal hygiene. Resident #71 also required one person physical assistance with bathing. Review of Resident #71's physician order dated 06/01/21 revealed Resident #71 may be oxygen at two to three liters per minute per nasal cannula as needed to maintain oxygen saturation above 90…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-04-25 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received written notice which specified the duration of the bed-hold policy upon hospitalization. This affected six (Resident #10, Resident #49, Resident #55, Resident #68, Resident #83 and Resident #87) of seven residents reviewed for discharge notification. The facility census was 98. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #68 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses; altered mental status, dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere without behavioral disturbance, peripheral vascular disease, essential hypertension, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris, hypertensive chronic kidney disease, gastro esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis, dysphagia, primary osteoarthritis, hyperlipidemia polyneuropathy chronic angle closure glaucoma, non traumatic acute subdural hemorrhage, other abnormalities of gait and mobility, unsteadiness on feet,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-04-25 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy for a resident with an injury of unknown origin. This affected one (Resident #68) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 98. Findings include: Review of Resident #68's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including altered mental status, dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere without behavioral disturbance, peripheral vascular disease, essential hypertension, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris, hypertensive chronic kidney disease, other abnormalities of gait and mobility, unsteadiness on feet, and other lack of coordination. Review of Resident #68's medical record indicated the resident had a fall on 02/23/19. The resident hit his left eye on the bottom of the bed and had left eye swelling and a small scratch. Resident #68 was started on neurological checks with no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-04-25 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's injury of unknown origin was reported to the state survey agency. This affected one (Resident #68) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 98. Findings include: Review of Resident #68's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including altered mental status, dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere without behavioral disturbance, peripheral vascular disease, essential hypertension, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris, hypertensive chronic kidney disease, other abnormalities of gait and mobility, unsteadiness on feet, and other lack of coordination. Review of Resident #68's medical record indicated the resident had a fall on 02/23/19. The resident hit his left eye on the bottom of the bed and had left eye swelling and a small scratch. Resident #68 was started on neurological checks with no issues noted.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-04-25 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to complete pre-admission screening and resident review (PASARR) for a newly admitted resident. This affected one (Resident #17) of two residents reviewed for PASARR. The facility census was 98. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses; toxic effect of keystones, other symbolic dysfunctions, other abnormalities of gait and mobility, end stage renal disease, dementia in other disease classified elsewhere with behavioral disturbance, mood disorder due to known physiological condition, legal blindness, impulse disorder, personal history of traumatic brain injury, type two diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, other chronic pain, weakness, hyperlipidemia, dementia in other disease classified elsewhere without behavioral disturbance, schizoaffective and unspecified atrial fibrillation. Review of Resident #17's quarterly Minimum Data Sets (MDS) assessment dated [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-04-25 · tag F0646 — isolated
    Notify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to notify the state mental health authority with a significant change pre-admission screening and resident review (PASARR) for a resident that a had a psychiatric hospitalization. This affected one (Resident #87) of one resident reviewed for significant change PASARR. The facility census was 98. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #87 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses; delirium due to known physiological condition, unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition, lymphangioma, hyperglycemia, major depressive disorder, multiple sclerosis, neoplasm of unspecified behavior of respiratory system, dissociative identify disorder, hyperlipidemia, other osteoporosis without current pathological fracture, other symbolic dysfunctions, dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere with behavioral disturbance and other lack of coordination. Review of Resident #87's PASARR…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2024-05-07 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were not provided plastic utensils with meals. This affected 46 residents (#47, #48, #49, #50, #51, #52, #53, #54, #55, #56, #57, #58, #59, #60, #61, #62, #63, #64, #65, #66, #67, #68, #69, #70, #71, #72, #73, #74, #75, #76, #77, #78, #79, #80, #81, #82, #83, #84, #85, #86, #87, #88, #89, #90, #91, and #92) out of 90 residents in the facility who received meals from the kitchen. Resident #13 received no food by mouth. The facility census was 91. Findings include: Observation of tray line on 05/06/24 at 8:30 A.M. revealed the facility ran out of silverware and used plastic silverware for the residents who resided on the second floor. Interview with Dietary Aide (DA) #93 on 05/06/24 at 8:30 A.M. verified the facility ran out of silverware and they used plastic silverware for the residents who resided on the second floor. Review of the facility Disposable Dishes and Utensils policy, dated November 2007, revealed the facility will use single service items only in extenuating circumstances…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CARECORE HEALTH — 10 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.1-1.1 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 51.8+0.2 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.7-0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.3-0.3 vs chain
The other 9 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.1★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
HERTANU, JOSEPHIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/01/2014
CARECORE HEALTH LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2017
HERTANU, CHAIMIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2017
MOQEETH, SYEDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2017
STRICKLAND, JENNIFERIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/30/2024
FASTEN HALBERSTAM LLPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2014
JH OHIO REALTY, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/28/2017

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+12.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$780K
Related-party expense9% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 36%Medicare 2%Other / private 61%

This home reported $780K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$264per resident / day
operating cost
$8,024per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$303per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 366145. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-03-06, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next