Carecore At Mary Scott
3109 Campus Dr, Dayton, OH 45406 · For profit - Corporation · 102 certified beds · (937) 278-0761 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (53) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 1.4% | 5.3% | 15.4% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.7% | 6.2% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.3% | 0.2% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.4% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 35.4% | 30.1% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.5% | 3.2% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 1.7% | 6.1% | 16.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 33.5% | 25.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 88.2% | 94.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.7% | 3.4% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 3.7% | 21.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 21.9% | 8.8% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.3% | 1.2% | 1.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 54.2% | 75.6% | 79.4% | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.17 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 17% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 102 beds and averages 62.8 residents a day — about 62% occupied, or roughly 39 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.36 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.49 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.75 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.81 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.58 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.59 to 0.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
53 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 42 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2022-07-21 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of hospital documentation, observation, interviews with staff, Certified Nurse Practitioner (CNP) #250 and family, review of facility policy, and review of medication information from Medscape, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary medications when the facility failed to adequately monitor Resident #21's blood glucose level before administering insulin. This resulted in Actual Harm when staff administered insulin to Resident #21 without monitoring the residents blood glucose levels and the resident was subsequently found unresponsive by staff and was admitted to a local hospital for hypoglycemia. This affected one (#21) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The census was 66. Findings include: Review of Resident #21's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/20/20. Diagnoses included schizophrenia, type II diabetes mellitus, anxiety, obesity, and bipolar disorder. Review of Resident #21's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff and resident guardian interviews, the facility failed to follow a resident's legal guardian's requests to not allow the resident to go on unsupervised Leave of Absences (LOA's) from the facility. This affected one (#59) out of three reviewed for supervision. The facility census was 59. Findings include: Review of the medical for Resident #59 revealed an admission date of 09/13/17 with diagnoses of bipolar disorder, current episode manic severe with psychotic features, anxiety disorder, and schizoaffective disorder. Review of the Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE] revealed Resident #59 was cognitively intact with a brief interview mental status (BIMS) of 15 out of 15. Review of the care plan, dated 06/20/18 revealed Resident #59 was at risk for injury related to elopement, not a wanderer, unsatisfied with guardian placement, has intent to leave facility, and Schizophrenia, with interventions of update boundaries, mental status and guardian guidance/consent. Guardian…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-25 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of a facility document, review of email correspondence, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure timely assistance with a resident/family initiated request for discharge to another facility. This affected one (Resident #27) out of three residents reviewed for discharge. The facility census was 64.Findings Included:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included type two diabetes, dementia, nutritional deficiency, acute kidney failure, transient ischemic attack, and atherosclerotic heart disease.Review of the quarterly minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #27 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of eight documented cognitive impairment. Resident #27 was set up or clean-up for oral care, and personal hygiene. Resident #27 was independent for personal hygiene, toileting, bathing, dressing upper and lower body, and placing shoes on and off feet. Review of a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure weekly skin assessments and treatments were completed as ordered. This affected one (Resident #23) out of three residents reviewed for wounds. The facility census was 64.Findings Included:Review of the medical record for Resident #23 revealed an admission date of 08/27/22. Diagnoses included morbid obesity, anxiety disorder, nonpsychotic mental disorder, schizoaffective disorder, chronic pain syndrome, osteoarthritis, and major depression. Review of the minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #23 had Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 revealing she had moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #23 was bed bound and required staff assistance for activities of daily living (ADL). Review of the weekly skin assessment dated from 12/18/25 where the heel wound was identified through 03/23/26 revealed Resident #23 had skin assessments on 02/03/26 and 03/17/26. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, observation, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to date opened vials of insulin and failed to remove expired insulin from two of four medication carts observed. The facility census was 71.Findings include:An observation on 12/12/25 at 9:45 A.M. of the medication cart for the 100 Hall revealed a vial of Lantus (a type of insulin) with an open date of 11/13/25. During a concurrent interview, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #7 stated Lantus was good for 28 days after the open date, which meant the vial of Lantus was expired and should have been removed from the medication cart. LPN #7 stated that the medication carts were checked weekly during the medication cart audits, and the nurse giving the medication was expected to check the labels of medications for expiration dates prior to giving the medication. LPN #7 stated she would discard the expired insulin. An observation on 12/12/25 at 9:55 A.M. of the medication cart for the 200 Hall revealed one vial of insulin that had an open date of 10/31/25. Three vials of insulin had been opened,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility document and policy review, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure staff wore beard restraints during food preparation, and the facility failed to ensure chemical test strips used to check the concentrations of sanitizing solutions were not expired. This affected all residents who ate food prepared in the kitchen. Findings include:1. An observation on 12/10/25 at 9:45 A.M. revealed Dietary [NAME] (DC) #5 was not wearing a beard restraint to cover his beard and mustache while preparing pork chops and cornbread. An observation on 12/10/25 at 11:47 A.M. revealed DC #6's hair restraint was not covering his beard while he was preparing mechanically altered pork chops. An observation on 12/10/25 at 11:54 A.M. revealed DC #6's hair restraint was not covering his beard while he was preparing pureed pork chops. An observation on 12/10/25 at 12:04 P.M. revealed DC #6's hair restraint was not covering his beard while he…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-13 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to allow a resident to determine their own treatment options. This affected one (#43) of two residents reviewed for exercising treatment options. The facility census was 71. Findings include: An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #43 on 07/12/25. According to the admission Record, Resident #43 had a medical history that included diagnoses of type II diabetes mellitus, essential hypertension, old myocardial infarction (heart attack), unspecified diastolic heart failure, atherosclerotic heart disease, schizophrenia, psychosis, depression, adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood, and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder-combined type. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/20/25, revealed Resident #43 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated the resident had intact cognition. The MDS indicated Resident #43 did not exhibit hallucinations, delusions, or rejection of care during the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-13 · tag F0576 — isolatedEnsure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided with reasonable access to a telephone in a private setting. This affected one (#23) of two residents reviewed for privacy. The facility census was 71.Findings include:An admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #23 on 11/21/17. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of paranoid schizophrenia, unspecified psychosis, anxiety disorder, and personality disorder. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/14/25, revealed Resident #23 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which indicated the resident had intact cognition. The MDS indicated the resident was independent with activities of daily living (ADLs). The MDS also indicated the resident had delusions, verbal behavioral symptoms directed toward others, and behavioral symptoms not directed towards others. Resident #23's Care Plan Report, initiated 02/14/25, indicated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, record review, and interview, the facility failed to report allegations of abuse to the State Survey Agency (SSA). This affected three (#69, #43, and #78) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 71.Findings include:1. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #69 on 07/12/25. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included a diagnosis of unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/15/25, revealed Resident #69 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8, which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated the resident did not exhibit physical behavioral symptoms directed toward others or verbal behavioral symptoms directed toward others during the assessment timeframe. Resident #69's Care Plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-13 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, record review, facility document review, and interview, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate allegations of abuse. This affected three (#69, #43, and #78) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 71.Findings include:1. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #69 on 07/12/25. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included a diagnosis of unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/15/25, revealed Resident #69 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8, which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated the resident did not exhibit physical behavioral symptoms directed toward others or verbal behavioral symptoms directed toward others during the assessment timeframe. Resident #69's Care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-13 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, record review, and interview, the facility failed to document in the medical record any behaviors to support the reason for an emergency discharge as documented on an Emergency Discharge Notice of Discharge and Discharge Summary, and failed to assist with coordinating after discharge care as outlined in the physician's Discharge Summary. This affected one (#78) of two residents reviewed for discharge requirements. The facility census was 71.Findings include: A facility policy titled, Discharge Planning Policy and Procedure, last reviewed 07/28/2025, revealed, This facility is committed to ensuring that all resident discharges are conducted in a safe, person-centered, and compliant manner is accordance with CMS [Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services] regulations F627 and F628. Discharges will be planned collaboratively with the resident, their representative, and the interdisciplinary team, with a focus on continuity of care, resident rights, and regulatory compliance. The policy revealed, 5. Post-Discharge Coordination, Arrange for, which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 42 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-13 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's discharge was accurately and thoroughly documented in the medical record. This affected one (#78) of two residents reviewed for discharge requirements. The facility census was 71.Findings include: An admission Record revealed the facility had admitted Resident #78 on 07/20/23. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of severe recurrent major depression without psychotic features, anxiety disorder, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, and cerebral palsy. An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 06/30/25, revealed Resident #78 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated the resident had intact cognition. The MDS indicated that Resident #78 scored seven on the Resident Mood interview, which indicated the resident had mild depressive symptoms. The MDS revealed Resident #78 exhibited no behavioral symptoms during the assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop individualized resident-centered care plans with measurable objectives for two (#3 and #61) of 49 residents whose care plans were reviewed. The facility census was 71. Findings include: 1. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #3 on 07/12/24. According to the admission Record, Resident #3 had a medical history that included diagnoses of cerebral infarction (stroke) and osteoarthritis. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/03/25, revealed Resident #3 had severe impairment in cognitive skills for daily decision-making and had a short-term and long-term memory problem per a staff assessment of mental status (SAMS). The MDS indicated Resident #3 had no rejection of care. The MDS indicated Resident #3 had functional limitation in range of motion with impairment on one upper extremity and one lower extremity. The MDS revealed Resident #3 was dependent on staff for completion of all activities of daily living (ADLs),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, observation, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to trim and clean the fingernails for one (#8) of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). The facility census was 71. Findings include:An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #8 on 12/22/09 and most recently readmitted the resident on 05/29/21. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included multiple sclerosis, type II diabetes mellitus, the need for assistance with personal care, and a contracture of the left hand. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/04/25, revealed Resident #8 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of three, which indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated Resident #8 was dependent upon staff for the completion of personal hygiene. Resident #8's Care Plan Report, included a focus area initiated 10/23/23, that indicated Resident #8 had a deficit in self-care related to multiple sclerosis. An undated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, observation, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to place a splint or handroll into residents contracted hands as ordered by the physician. This affected two (#3 #8) of three residents reviewed for contractures. The facility census was 71.Findings include: 1. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #3 on 07/12/24. According to the admission Record, Resident #3 had a medical history that included cerebral infarction (stroke) and osteoarthritis. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/03/25, revealed Resident #3 had severe impairment in cognitive skills for daily decision-making and had short-term and long-term memory problems per a Staff Assessment of Mental Status (SAMS). The MDS indicated Resident #3 had not rejected care during the assessment's lookback period. The MDS indicated the resident had functional limitations in range of motion on one upper extremity and one lower extremity. The MDS revealed Resident #3 was dependent on staff for completion of all activities of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, facility policy review, and product operation manuals, the facility failed to ensure resident weight settings were correct on low air loss mattresses. This affected two (#2 and #57) of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcer management. The facility census was 71.Findings include:1. An admission Record indicated the facility originally admitted Resident #2 on 07/29/15 and readmitted the resident on 03/06/23. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of congestive heart failure and unspecified head injury. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 09/12/25, revealed Resident #2 had severe impairment in cognitive skills for daily decision-making and had a short-term and long-term memory problem per a staff assessment of mental status (SAMS). The MDS indicated Resident #2 was dependent with activities of daily living (ADLs) and had functional limitations of both upper and lower extremities. The MDS indicated Resident #2 was at risk for pressure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents did not retain their own lighters according to the facility policy. This affected three (#61, #5, and #58) of four residents reviewed for smoking. The facility census was 71.Findings include: 1. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #61 on 09/04/25. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of acute chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, unspecified; and unspecified asthma, uncomplicated. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 09/11/25, revealed Resident #61 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which indicated the resident had intact cognition. Resident #61's Care Plan Report revealed no information about the resident smoking. Resident #61's Smoking Assessment, dated 12/04/25, indicated that Resident #61 did not have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on manufacturer guidelines, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff sanitized a blood glucose monitor after checking a resident's blood sugar and before placing the blood glucose monitor into the medication cart for further use. This affected one (#8) of two residents observed who had their blood sugar checked during medication administration. The facility census was 71.Findings include:An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #8 on 12/22/09 and most recently readmitted the resident on 05/29/21. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included a diagnosis of type II diabetes mellitus. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/04/25, revealed Resident #8 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of three, which indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated that the resident had an active diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. Resident #8's Care Plan Report revealed a focus statement initiated 09/23/14, that indicated the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-12 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interviews, review of the Ohio Department of Health (ODH) Gateway Application, review of a facility timeline, review of a Narcotic Administration Sheet and policy review, the facility failed to report an allegation of misappropriation to the State Agency. This affected one (#79) out of three residents reviewed for misappropriation. The facility census was 77. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #79 revealed an admission date of 03/05/25 with diagnoses of osteomyelitis, type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, neoplasm of unspecified behavior of respiratory system, retropharyngeal and parapharyngeal abscess, personal history of malignant neoplasm of larynx, and tracheostomy status. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact, did not eat anything by mouth, and was independent with all activities of daily living. Review of the physician orders revealed an order dated 06/30/25 for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure tracheostomy (trach) supplies were available in accordance with the care plan and facility policy. This affected one (#77) out of three residents reviewed for trach care and services. The facility census was 77. Finding include: Review of the medical record for Resident #77 revealed an admission date of 03/06/23 with diagnoses of anoxic brain damage, epilepsy, unspecified, intractable, without status epilepticus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and acute on chronic systolic (congestive) heart failure. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively impaired, was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living, and resident had a trach. Review of the care plan dated 03/07/23 revealed a care plan for trach related to impaired breathing mechanics injury with interventions of keep extra trach tube and obturator at bedside. If tube is coughed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure food items were properly stored. This had the potential to affect all residents, except two (#29 and #80) residents identified by the facility as receiving no nutrition from the kitchen. The facility census was 82. Findings include: Observation on 01/23/25 at 9:10 A.M. of the walk-in freezer revealed a package of opened and undated hot dogs on the top shelf. The hotdog packaging was not sealed, leaving the hot dogs exposed to the freezer elements. Further observation revealed a package of pepperoni, not in the original packaging, which was unlabeled and undated. Observation on 01/23/25 at 9:20 A.M. of the walk-in refrigerator revealed an opened package of shredded cheese, two opened packages of bologna, and sliced turkey wrapped in pan liner paper. Each of the items were undated. Interview on 01/23/25 at 9:35 A.M. with Dietary Manager (DM) #63 verified the hot dogs in the walk-in freezer were not properly sealed or dated and the pepperoni was unlabeled and undated. DM #63 confirmed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of a transportation communication log, resident and staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide proper and timely care/services to ensure a medical procedure was completed. This affected one (#9) of three residents reviewed for outside medical appointments. The census was 83. Findings Include: Resident #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses were rhabdomylosis, congestive heart failure, alcohol dependence, alcoholic hepatitis, alcohol abuse, hepatic encephalopathy, dementia, depression, hypertension, and tobacco use. Review of Resident #9's minimum data set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/29/24, revealed he had a mild cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #9's Central Appointment Communication Sheet, dated 10/18/24, revealed he was to have an orthopedic appointment on 11/20/24. Handwritten on this form, it stated, rescheduled per [physician], awaiting cardiac clearance. There was no date as to when this order was given by the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of a transportation communication log and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain complete resident medical records regarding outside medical appointments. This affected three (#9, #20, and #35) of three residents reviewed for outside medical appointments. The census was 83. Findings Include: 1. Resident #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses were rhabdomylosis, congestive heart failure, alcohol dependence, alcoholic hepatitis, alcohol abuse, hepatic encephalopathy, dementia, depression, hypertension, and tobacco use. Review of Resident #9's minimum data set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/29/24, revealed he had a mild cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #9's Central Appointment Communication Sheet, dated 10/18/24, revealed he was to have an orthopedic appointment on 11/20/24. Handwritten on this form, it stated, rescheduled per [physician], awaiting cardiac clearance. There was no date as to when this order was given by the physician. Also, there…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-29 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to administer a medication as ordered. This affected one (#3) of three residents reviewed for medication administration. The census was 75. Findings include: Review of Resident #3's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/12/24. Diagnoses listed included psychoactive substance abuse, obesity, osteomyelitis, pulmonary embolism, and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Review of an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #3 was cognitively intact. Review of physician orders revealed an order dated 09/12/24 for Ertapenem Sodium Reconstituted (antibiotic) one gram. Use one gram intravenously (IV) every 24 hours for infection until 10/29/24. Review of medication administration records (MAR) revealed Ertapenem Sodium Reconstituted one gram (IV) was not documented as being administered on 09/18/24, 09/27/24, 10/02/24, 10/04/24, 10/08/24, 10/10/24, 10/16/24, and 10/17/24. Interview with the Director of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-28 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents received their medications as ordered. This affected one (Resident #64) of three residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 61. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #64's revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including type two diabetes mellitus, history of gangrene of the right foot, peripheral vascular disease, and essential hypertension. Review of the November 2023 physician orders for Resident #64 revealed orders for Ampicillin and Sulbactam (antibiotic) 3 grams (gm) intravenously every six hours at 12:00 A.M., 6:00 A.M., 12:00 P.M., and 6:00 P.M. related to gangrene of right foot. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for November 2023 for Resident #64 revealed the resident had not received the ordered antibiotic, Ampicillin and Sulbactam 3 gm intravenously on 11/02/23 at 6:00…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-07-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespreadEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview and review of facility policy the facility failed to discard expired medications. This affected one (first floor) of two medication rooms observed during the survey and had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility failed to ensure medication were labeled, dated and stored appropriately in the medication carts. This affected one (200 hall) of two medication carts reviewed. Facility census was 66. Findings include: Observation and interview on 07/12/22 at 12:22 P.M. of the emergency medications stored in the first floor medication storage room revealed there were greater then 50 different expired medications. The dates varied from 03/15/22 to 07/05/22. This was verified with Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) #131 at the time of observation. The facility confirmed the emergency medications could be utilized for any resident residing in the facility. Observation and interview on 07/12/22 at 11:08 AM of the 200 hall medication cart with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #210 in the top drawer of the medication cart…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-07-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. Observation of staff members upon entrance to the facility on [DATE] at 8:00 A.M. revealed no staff members were wearing eye protection while in resident care areas. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #240 on 07/11/22 at 8:36 A.M. confirmed she was not wearing any eye protection while caring for residents. LPN #240 stated she was told she was not required to wear any. Interview with State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #152 on 07/11/22 at 10:07 A.M. confirmed she was not wearing any eye protection. STNA #152 stated eye protection was not required, just facemask's. During in interview on 07/11/22 at 10:48 A.M. Regional Director of Clinical Services (RDCS) #250 confirmed staff members were not currently wearing any eye protection in the facility. RDCS #250 stated that staff were only required to wear eye protection if the county level was red, and currently the county was yellow. RDCS #250 stated she called the county health department every Monday to confirm the level. Review of the CDC website…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-07-21 · tag F0885 — failed to notify residents/families about COVID-19 — widespreadReport COVID19 data to residents and families.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observations, staff and family interviews and policy review, facility failed to inform resident's, their representatives and families of positive Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases in the facility. This had the potential to affect all 66 residents residing in the facility. Facility census was 66. Findings include Observation on 07/13/22 at 8:30 A.M. revealed front desk staff did not update visitors upon entrance to the facility of the COVID-19 outbreak. No signs were posted around the entrance to the facility regarding a COVID-19 outbreak. Interview on 07/13/22 at 2:20 P.M. with Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) #131 revealed facility notifies residents and family of COVID-19 status in the facility by in person updates for residents that are their own decision makers and phone calls to families and guardians. ADON #131 revealed on the evening on 07/12/22 around 9:00 P.M. outbreak testing was done due to a resident testing positive for COVID-19. By the time outbreak testing was completed nine residents on the memory care unit had tested positive for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-07-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure all items stored in the refrigerator and freezer were properly labeled. This had the potential to affect 64 out of 66 residents residing in the facility as two residents (#32 and #60) do not consume food from the kitchen. The facility census was 66. Findings include: Observations on 07/11/22 from 8:38 A.M. to 8:43 A.M. revealed undated waffles, angel food cake, vanilla ice cream, English muffins, and breadsticks in the freezer. There was an undated metal container filled with hot dogs and covered with plastic wrap as well as undated [NAME] slaw, sandwiches, shredded cheese, lunch meat, jelly, and barbeque sauce located in the refrigerator. Interviews on 07/11/22 from 8:38 A.M. to 8:43 A.M. with Dietary Manager #175 confirmed the undated items in the freezer and refrigerator. The facility confirmed 64 out of 66 residents receive their meals from the kitchen and there are two (#32 and #60) residents who do not receive the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-07-21 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview and policy review, facility failed to ensure the influenza (flu) and pneumonia vaccinations were offered and provided to residents. This affected four (#14, #21, #52, and #54) of five residents reviewed for immunizations. Facility census was 66. Findings include 1. Review of the medical record for the Resident #14 revealed an admission date of 02/17/22. Diagnoses included repeated falls, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and intellectual disabilities. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #14 had significant cognitive impairment with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) of six out of 15 and required extensive assistance of one staff member for bed mobility and transfers. Further review of Resident #14's record revealed there was no evidence of consents for the flu vaccine or updated pneumonia vaccine. Review of the immunology record revealed Resident #14 had received the pneumonia vaccinations on 01/05/2011…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-07-21 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolatedAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff, resident and representative interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents and families were invited to attend interdisciplinary care conferences. This affected one (#53) of five residents reviewed for care plans and care conferences. Facility census was 66. Findings include Review of the medical record for the Resident #53 revealed an admission date of 07/24/20. Diagnoses included demyelinating disease of the central nervous system, sepsis, urinary tract infection, bacteremia, respiratory failure with hypoxia, multiple sclerosis, kidney failure, paranoid schizophrenia, muscle weakness, repeated falls and traumatic brain injury. Review of the Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #53 was cognitively intact with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) of 15 out of 15 and required extensive assistance of two staff members for bed mobility and transfers. Review of care conference meeting dated 07/23/21, 10/05/21,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-07-21 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, review of Medicare beneficiary notice letters, and staff interview, the facility failed to issue the Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notices (SNFABN), as required to residents when their Medicare Part A Services were ending. This affected two (#11 and #365) of three residents reviewed for Medicare beneficiary notice letters. The census was 66. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #11's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/27/16. Diagnoses listed included hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and muscle weakness. Review of Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) dated 05/10/22 revealed Medicare part A Services would end on 05/12/22. Further review of Resident #11's medical record revealed she remain in the facility after 05/12/22 and currently resided in the facility. There was no documentation of a SNFABN being issued to Resident #11. 2. Review of Resident #365's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/14/17. Diagnoses listed included hypertension, type II diabetes mellitus, and muscle weakness. Review of NOMNC dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and staff and resident interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's bathroom and shower were in good condition. This affected one (#364) out of 19 resident reviewed in the sample. The census was 66. Findings include: Review of Resident #364 medical record revealed an admission date of 07/07/22. Diagnoses listed included burns to 30 to 39 percent of body, opioid dependence, traumatic [NAME] injury, and major depressive disorder. A Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment had not yet been completed. Observation of Resident #364's bathroom on 07/14/22 at 11:25 A.M. revealed the floor outside of the shower was covered with a blanket and towels. The blanket and towels were wet. The right side bottom edge of the shower had an area with no rubber seal. Water was visible on the bathroom floor. The drain located in the center of the shower was not covered with a screen. A bath chair and bath supplies were in the shower. The flooring to the left of the toilet was peeling up…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-21 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident on dialysis was monitored for signs and symptoms of infection. This affected one (#22) of one residents reviewed for dialysis. The facility census was 66. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #22 revealed an admission date of 04/14/05. Diagnoses included venous insufficiency (chronic) peripheral, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris, anemia, hypertension, peripheral vascular disease, edema, type two diabetes mellitus without complications, legal blindness, major depressive disorder, unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance, and chronic kidney disease stage 4. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 04/23/22, revealed Resident #22 had severely impaired cognition evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 00. Resident #22 was assessed to require extensive assistance for bed mobility, transfer, and dressing, supervision for eating, and was totally…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-21 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff and Physician #210 interviews, the facility failed to ensure physician ordered laboratory (lab) values were obtained as physician ordered. This affected one (#4) of one residents reviewed for labs services. Facility census was 66. Findings include: Review of the medical record for the Resident #4 revealed an admission date of 10/06/11. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Alzheimer's disease, dementia, psychosis, vascular disease, and malnutrition. Review of the Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #4 had significant cognitive impairment with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) of seven out of 15 and required supervision assistance of one staff members for bed mobility and transfers. Review of pharmacy recommendation dated 05/28/22 revealed Resident #4 was receiving treatment with a HMG CoA reductase inhibitor medication to lower cholesterol. The Pharmacist requested a fasting lipid panel and liver function…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-07-21 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of electronic mail (email) communication, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents had dental services arranged in a timely manner. This affected two (#43 and #44) out of three residents reviewed for dental services. The facility census was 66. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #44 revealed an admission date of 10/20/16. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction, hypertension, rheumatoid arthritis, hydrocephalus, cholecystitis, major depressive disorder, and unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbance. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 06/13/22, revealed Resident #44 had severely impaired cognition evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of three out of 15. Resident #44 was assessed to require extensive assistance for bed mobility and dressing, limited assistance for eating, and was totally dependent on staff for transfer, personal hygiene, and toileting.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-07-21 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccinations were offered and provided to residents. This affected three (#14, #31, and #52) of five residents reviewed for immunization. Facility census was 66. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for the Resident #14 revealed an admission date of 02/17/22. Diagnoses included repeated falls, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and intellectual disabilities. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #14 had significant cognitive impairment with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) of six out of 15 and required extensive assistance of one staff member for bed mobility and transfers. Review of Resident #14's record revealed no evidence of consents for the COVID-19 vaccine. Review of the immunology record revealed Resident #14 had no record of any COVID-19 vaccines. 2. Review of the medical record for the Resident #31…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-06-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of the facility's Water Management Plan and staff interview, the facility failed to implement it's Legionella prevention plan. This had the potential to affect all the residents of the facility. The census was 79. Findings include: Review of the facility's Water Management Plan dated 09/04/18 revealed the facility would complete water temperature checks monthly. Hot water was to be above 122 degrees Fahrenheit (F), cold water temperatures were to be below 68 F. Shower heads and hoses would be dismantled, cleaned, disinfected, and descaled quarterly. During an interview on 06/05/19 at 2:10 P.M. Maintenance Director (MD) #56 confirmed water checks were not being completed monthly for temperatures above 122 F or below 68 F, and that shower heads and hoses were not dismantled, cleaned, disinfected, and descaled quarterly. MD #56 was unable to provide any documentation of any water checks being completed or shower head maintenance per the facility's Water Management Plan.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-06-06 · tag F0576 — patternEnsure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident council meeting, resident and staff interviews, review of the local post office business hours, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure mail was delivered on Saturdays. This affected six (#14, #15, #28, #41, #47, and #61) of six residents interviewed during resident council meeting and had the potential to affect all 79 residents in the facility. Facility census was 79. Findings include: During a resident council meeting held on 06/04/19 at 1:34 P.M., revealed Residents (#14, #15, #28, #41, #47, and #61) stated that no mail was delivered on Saturdays due to no one was in the front office to deliver the mail to the residents. Interview with Director of Activities (DA) #47 on 06/04/19 at 2:00 P.M., stated the postal service did deliver mail to the facility on Saturdays and the mail was held until Monday when staff was at work. Review of the local post office business hours revealed on Saturdays the post office was opened from 9:00 A.M. to 1:00 P.M. Review of facility policy titled Mail Delivery with no date revealed mail will be delivered to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-06-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, and review of facility policy the facility failed to maintain residents' room environment in a safe and comfortable manner. This affected 10 rooms (100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 106, 108, 113, 114, and 115) out of 13 rooms on the 100 Hall. Facility census was 79. Findings include: 1. During initial tour and observation of the facility on 06/03/19 at 10:02 A.M., revealed a. room [ROOM NUMBER] had approximately four holes in the wall near the back and in the bathroom; exposing the drywall. The holes were approximately dime size. b. room [ROOM NUMBER] closet doors were off the hinges and the privacy curtains had about 10 brown colored stains that were approximately three to five inches. c. room [ROOM NUMBER]'s bathroom had approximately four holes on the wall that were each about the size of a dime. 2. Observations on 06/04/19 at 6:07 P.M., revealed rooms (103, 106, 108, 113, 114, and 115) had approximately four holes that were each about the size of a dime. room…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-06-06 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to accurately complete Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments. This affected two (#13 and #77) of 18 residents reviewed during the investigation stage of the annual survey. The facility census was 79. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #13's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/22/09 with diagnoses that included cognitive communication deficit, major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, dementia with behavioral disturbance, and other mental disorders due to known physiological condition. Review of an annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #13 was not coded as having a serious mental illness. Review of a pre-admission screening and annual resident review (PASARR) level 2 dated 12/21/09 revealed that Resident #13 was determined to have serious mental illness. MDS Nurse #49 confirmed during an interview on 06/05/19 at 11:47 A.M. that Resident #13 should have been coded as having a serious mental illness on the annual…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-06-06 · tag F0711 — patternEnsure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to have resident's medication and/or treatment orders reviewed and signed by the physician. This affected three Resident's (#19, #38 and #42) reviewed during the investigation stage of the annual survey. The facility census was 79. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including sequelae of cerebra infarction, muscle weakness, dysphagia, hemiplegia and hemiparesis of left side, type two diabetes, hypertension, dementia with behavioral disturbance, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart disease, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, glaucoma, vertigo, and Alzheimer's disease. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired with inattention, disorganized thinking, hallucinations, delusions, and other behavioral symptoms not directed towards others. Review of Section G-Functional Status…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-06-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to securely store medications and/or dispose of outdated/undated medication. This had the potential to affect all 79 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Observation conducted on [DATE] at 10:43 P.M. with Registered Nurse (RN) #11 revealed three cases of Betaseron Injections (for treatment of Multiple Sclerosis) were noted sitting on the counter in the unlocked chart room, and unattended by staff. Interview at the time of the observation with RN #11 verified the medication was left in the chart room and stated that was where they kept the cases of that medication for the resident. At that time, RN #11 removed the medication and put it inside the locked 100/200 hall medication room. The 100/200 hall medication room was observed and noted there were three bottles of Mineral Oil (for constipation) with an expiration date of 01/2019, one box of Bisacodyl suppositories (for constipation) with an expiration date…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-06-06 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — patternMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain resident call lights in working order. This affected six Rooms # (301, 303, 304, 306, 308, and 310) of 13 rooms on the 300 hall. The facility census was 79. Findings include: Observation and interview conducted on 06/03/19 at 10:17 A.M. with Activities Assistant (AA) #28 revealed a resident in room [ROOM NUMBER] was requesting assistance, and upon hitting the call button, it was noted the light was not working. Further observation of the 300 hall rooms revealed lights in rooms 303, 304, 306, and 308 were not working, and rooms 301 A bed and 310 A bed were both noted with the push button broke off. AA #28 verified call lights not working and some push buttons were broken and stated it must have just happened because the lights were working. Observation and interview conducted on 06/06/19 at 2:05 P.M. with Maintenance Worker (MW) #77 verified lights in rooms 303, 304, 306, and 308 were all not working, and rooms 301 A bed and 310 A bed were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-06-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to treat a resident in a dignified manner. This affected one Resident (#55) of two reviewed for dignity during the investigation stage of the annual survey. The facility census was 79. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #55 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including mental disorder due to known physiological condition, trichomoniasis, hypertension, benign neoplasm of skin, cardiomegaly, hyperlipidemia, nicotine dependence, dementia without behavioral disturbance, and paranoid schizophrenia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired with inattention, disorganized thinking, and delusional behaviors. Review of section G-Functional Status revealed the resident required extensive two-person assistance with bed mobility, total two-person assistance with transfer, walking did not occur, total one-person…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-06-06 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interviews and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to assess, monitor, and/or obtain orders for a resident's seatbelt. This affected one resident (#33) of one reviewed for restraints during the investigation stage of the annual survey. The facility census was 79. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral infarction, intellectual disabilities, anemia, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, insomnia, osteoporosis, dysphagia, and convulsions. Further review of the medical record was silent of verification of an assessment, physician order, care plan, and/or monitoring for the use of a seatbelt. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident had moderate cognitive impairment with no noted behaviors. Review of section G-Functional Assessment revealed the resident required extensive one-person assistance with bed mobility,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-06-06 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to update a resident's care plan. This affected one Resident (#64) of two reviewed for urinary catheters. The census was 79. Findings include: Review of Resident #64's medical record revealed and admission date of 07/21/18 with diagnoses that included prostatic endocarcinoma, chronic kidney disease, diabetes mellitus type II, cerebrovascular disease and hypertension. Review of a care plan dated 07/26/18 revealed Resident #64 has an indwelling urinary (Foley) catheter due to urinary obstruction. Observation and interview on 06/05/19 at 8:44 A.M. revealed Resident #64 did not have Foley catheter. Minimum Data Set (MDS) Nurse #49 confirmed during an interview on 06/05/19 at 10:03 A.M. that Resident #64 no longer had a Foley catheter and his care plan had not been updated. Unit Manager #76 during an interview on 06/06/19 at 12:45 P.M. confirmed Resident #64 no longer had a Foley catheter and that it had been removed 09/08/18.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-06-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide bathing assistance to residents who required assistance. This affected one (#127) of two residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL). The census was 79. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #127 revealed an admission date of 05/23/19. Diagnoses included lumbago with sciatica right side, other intervertebral disc, degeneration lumbar region, muscle weakness, difficulty in walking not elsewhere, foot drop left foot, other irritable bowel syndrome, spondylosis cervical other cervical disc displacement unspecified cervical region, post-traumatic stress disorder, infantile idiopathic scoliosis, hypertension gastro-esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis and asthma. Review of admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 05/30/19 revealed Resident #127 had intact cognition and required limited assistance for personal hygiene, transfer dressing and toileting. Interview on 06/03/19 at 10:53 A.M., Resident #127 reported she had not had a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-06-06 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and staff interviews, the facility failed to assess and/or monitor for continued use of a urinary catheter. This affected one Resident (#3) of two residents reviewed for urinary catheters during the investigation stage of the annual survey. The facility census was 79. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including protein-calorie malnutrition, heart disease, hypertension, and heart failure. Further review of the medical record was silent of diagnoses and/or rationale for use of a urinary catheter, physician assessment of the catheter, and/or assessments/attempts to discontinue its use. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment. Review of section G-functional status revealed the resident required supervision with eating, extensive one-person assistance with dressing, total one-person assistance with toileting,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-06-06 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation, and staff interview the facility failed to obtain a chest X-ray as ordered by a physician. This affected one Resident (#19) of one reviewed for respiratory care. The census was 79. Findings include: Review of Resident #19's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/24/17 with diagnoses that included muscle weakness, diabetes mellitus type II, chronic ischemic heart disease and hypertension. Further review of the medical record revealed a physician order dated 04/23/19 for a chest X-ray due to productive cough. Chest X-ray results were not found in Resident #19's medical record for 04/23/19. During an interview on 06/03/19 at 10:52 A.M. Resident #19 stated she had a cough for months. Resident #19 coughed up pale yellow phlegm during the interview. Unit Manager (UM) #76 during an interview on 06/06/19 at 10:40 A.M. confirmed Resident #19's chest X-ray was not completed as ordered on 04/23/19.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-06-06 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to appropriately assess a Resident #64's dialysis access. This affected one Resident (#64)of one reviewed for dialysis. The census was 79. Findings include: Review of Resident #64's medical record revealed and admission date of 07/21/18 with diagnoses that included prostatic endocarcinoma, chronic kidney disease, diabetes mellitus type II, cerebrovascular disease and hypertension. Further review revealed Resident #64 was receiving hemodialysis services from an outpatient dialysis facility. Resident #64 was receiving dialysis treatments through a dialysis catheter in his right upper chest. Review of progress notes dated 06/04/19 at 3:29 P.M. revealed that Registered Nurse (RN) #11 documented Resident #64 being assessed for bruit and thrill. An observation of RN #11 assessing Resident #64 for bruit and thrill was made on 06/05/19 at 10:17 A.M. RN # 11 palpated and listened with a stethoscope around Resident #64's dialysis catheter. During an interview at the time of the observation RN #11 confirmed she had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-06-06 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were was free of unnecessary medications. This affected two Residents (#11 and #42) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 79. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #11 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoes included abscess of the rectum and/or peri -rectal area type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, urinary tract infection, pressure ulcer of unspecified buttock, obstructive sleep apnea syndrome, morbid severe obesity due to excess calorie, hypothalamic-pituitary insufficiency, dysphagia pharyngoesophageal phase, gastro-esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis and sepsis. Review of quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #11 had intact cognition and required extensive assistance with activities of daily living. Review psychiatry notes with date of service on 04/01/19 revealed Resident #11 was prescribed Alprazolam one…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-06-06 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to obtain physician ordered labs for residents. This affected one Resident (#42) of five reviewed for unnecessary medications during the investigation stage of the annual survey. The facility census was 79. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia with behavioral disturbance, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, myasthenia gravis, heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, hyperlipidemia, osteoarthritis, falls, and difficulty walking. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired with inattention, disorganized, and rejection of care behaviors noted. Review of Section G-Functional Status revealed the resident required extensive one-person assistance with bed mobility, eating, total one-person assistance with transfer, dressing,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CARECORE HEALTH — 10 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.1 | +0.9 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 1.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 1.7 | +1.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
The other 9 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.1★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| HERTANU, CHAIM | Individual | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2002 |
| CARECORE HEALTH LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2021 |
| DOSLAND, CHRISTINE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/07/2023 |
| HUNTER, ROBERT | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2024 |
| CARECORE MARY SCOTT REALTY, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2021 |
| FASTEN HALBERSTAM LLP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2021 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $180K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 366122. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.