Anadarko Nursing & Rehab

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.01 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 1% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 92 beds and averages 78.5 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.67 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.26 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.18 to 0.08 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-11-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY A past noncompliance Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was determined to exist effective 11/13/24 related to the facility's failure to ensure a resident was free from accident hazards. The facility failed to safely secure Resident #1 in their wheelchair during transport which resulted in serious injury/harm. On 11/18/24 at 2:48 p.m., the Oklahoma State Department of Health verified the existence of the past noncompliance related to the facility's failure to safely secure a resident in a wheelchair during transport. The past noncompliance IJ was removed effective 11/14/24 after the facility put measures in place to prevent recurrence. On 11/14/24 the facility maintenance supervisor inspected the facility transport van to ensure all safety straps and harnesses were in working order and implemented monthly inspections to ensure proper working order, all drivers were inserviced on proper uses and placement of safety straps in the facility transport van and they will be inserviced quarterly, a QAPI improvement plan was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · G2026-03-30 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure grievances were received and tracked by an identified grievance official per facility policy. The ADON identified 76 residents resided at the facility.Findings: Facility's grievance binder was reviewed. The binder contained several grievances filed by Resident #23 dated 01/07/26 and 03/19/26. The grievance dated 01/07/26 had no investigation reports attached.An undated policy titled, Grievance policy and procedure, read in part, the administrator should inform the complainant of the findings of the investigation within ten days of receiving the written grievance report and actions that will be taken to correct any identified problems.On 03/24/26 at 9:30 a.m., Resident #23 stated that they had filled out multiple grievances against a nursing staff member. Resident #23 stated they had not heard back from facility's administrative staff regarding the grievances.On 03-26-26 at 10:43 a.m., CNA #1 stated that nursing staff are required to take grievances as soon as they are written to the administrator.On 03-26-26 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-03-30 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure RN coverage for eight consecutive hours seven days per week.The ADON identified 76 residents resided in the center.Findings:A Staffing Policy, dated 10/2023, read in part, RN must be on duty 8 hours a day 7 days a week. A PBJ Staffing Data Report, dated 03/20/26, showed the facility did not have RN coverage for quarter 1 of 2026. The dates identified were: a. 10/05/25,b. 10/12/25,c. 10/18/25,d. 10/19/25,e. 11/09/25,f. 11/15/25,g. 11/29/25,h. 11/30/25,i. 12/06/25,j. 12/07/25,k. 12/13/25, l. 12/14/25,m. 12/20/25,n. 12/21/25,o. 12/27/25, andp. 12/28/25. On 03/27/26 at 8:52 a.m., the business office manager stated the corporate human resource officer was responsible for inputting PBJ data and they confirmed the missing RN coverage from the PBJ report was accurate. On 03/27/26 at 8:57 a.m., the corporate human resource officer stated the RN hours listed as not covered for quarter 1 of 2026 were correct. There was no RN coverage for those dates. On 03/27/26 at 9:02 a.m., the DON stated they were aware of the missing RN…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to;1 report an allegation of abuse to Oklahoma State Department of Health within two hours of discovery of the alleged abuse, and;2 immediately report an allegation of abuse to the local police, and;3 report an allegation of abuse to the Oklahoma Board of Nursing for 1 (#23) of 3 residents sampled for abuse allegations.The ADON identified 76 residents resided in the facility.Findings:An Abuse Policy Procedure, undated, read in part, All allegations of resident maltreatment, including neglect, physical abuse, mental abuse, sexual abuse, involuntary isolation, verbal abuse, injuries of unknown origin, and/or misappropriation of property, shall be promptly reported to administrator and investigated by facility management. Administrator will immediately report the allegation to the Oklahoma State Department of Health and local police. The following person or entities will be notified by facility personnel: state registry if perpetrator is known. When the allegation involves abuse or results in serious bodily injury you must…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure:a. left over food items were properly sealed, dated, and labeled, b. condiment containers were dated when opened, c. dried spillage were kept cleaned off the outside of the condiment containers,d. dishwasher sanitation was performed, e. dishes were air dried, and f. hand hygiene is practiced correctly,according to the standards of practice for 2 of 2 kitchen observations. The ADON identified 76 residents were served from the kitchen. Findings: 03/24/26 9:50 a.m., a tour of kitchen performed and the following were observed: a. an undated unlabeled bag of leftover pasta was observed to be in the refrigerator,b. an undated opened gallon container of mustard was observed to have dried spillage down the side onto the label,c. an undated opened gallon container of Ranch dressing with dried spillage down the side onto the label with the lid not secured properly,d. an open undated half package of sliced ham was observed to be in the refrigerator,e. stacked cups and plates were observed to have water droplets…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for the residents.The ADON identified 76 residents resided in the facility. Findings:On 03/24/26 at 11:35 a.m., during facility tour, the following observations were made: 1. A folded bed sheet was observed to be tacked up over the window in rooms W4, W6, and W8,2. Room W6 was observed to be cluttered with items on the floor,3. Room W12B was observed to have clutter on the shelves and in the corners. The extra bed was not made up with linens. A TV was observed to be sitting on the floor. The room had an odor of urine, and4. Door facings and walls throughout the facility were observed to have chipped and peeled paint. 03/30/26 at 10:00 a.m., the following observations were made in the TV room::1. Baseboard ledges had dirt and dust build up, 2. A box fan guard had dust and dirt collected on one side, and3. The air return vent covers in the walls had dirt build up and were bent. 03/30/2026 at 10:39 a.m., Housekeeper #1 stated there was not a scheduled…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-30 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a quarterly MDS assessment contained accurate information for 1 (#39) of 6 sampled residents reviewed for MDS accuracy.The ADON identified 76 residents resided in the facility.Findings:A diet order for Res #39, dated 05/06/25, showed the resident was ordered a low concentrate diet.A quarterly assessment, dated 02/11/26, showed Res #39 did not have a therapeutic diet as a nutritional approach.On 03/27/26 at 9:36 a.m., MDS Coordinator #1 stated Res #39's therapeutic diet had not been indicated in their 02/11/26 quarterly assessment. They stated the document should have indicated the resident had received a therapeutic diet.On 03/27/26 at 9:50 a.m., the DON stated it was their and the facility's expectation that all MDS assessments would always reflect the residents' condition and treatments at the time they are completed.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-30 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure food was served at a safe temperature for 1 (#38) of 6 sampled residents receiving pureed diets. The ADON identified 76 residents were served from the kitchen. Findings:On 03/26/26 at 12:26 p.m., Resident #38's lunch tray was observed to be sitting in front of them without anyone available to assist with the meal. The temperature of pureed chicken noodles was 91 degrees. On 03/26/26 at 12:31 p.m., LPN #1 was observed to be assisting Resident #38 with eating without rewarming or requesting new tray. A quarterly MDS dated [DATE] showed Resident #38 cognitive skills was severely impaired with diagnoses which included profound intellectual disabilities and aphasia. The MDS showed Resident #38 was dependent on staff for all ADL's. A care plan updated 01/02/26 showed Resident #38 required assistance with eating meals. On 03/26/26 at 12:26 p.m., LPN #1 stated they are not supposed to leave the tray in front of dependent residents until…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions were used during supra pubic catheter care for 1 (#6) of 1 resident reviewed for catheter care. The ADON identified 1 resident had a catheter in the facility. Findings:On 03/25/26 at 2:46 p.m., LPN #1 was observed to be performing supra pubic catheter care on Resident #6. LPN #1 was observed to don gloves, but no gown was observed to be donned which was required for enhanced barrier precautions during catheter care. LPN #1 was also observed to perform the entire catheter care task for Resident #6 without changing their contaminated gloves. LPN #1 was observed to adjust Resident #6s clothes and replace over bed table back in position while wearing the same contaminated gloves.A facility policy titled, Catheter Care, Urinary with a revised date of 09/2014, read in part, the purpose of this procedure is to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Review the resident's care plan to assess for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-11-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from sexual abuse for one (#47) of five residents sampled for abuse. The administrator reported two allegations of sexual abuse. An Abuse Policy and Procedure policy, dated 07/23/21, read in part, We will endeavor to protect our occupants from maltreatment, which means adult abuse, exploitation, neglect, physical abuse, sexual abuse, neglect .Sexual abuse includes sexual harassment, sexual coercion, or sexual assault. Resident #47 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses which included schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, depression, rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, anxiety, and history of traumatic brain injury. An annual assessment for Resident #47, dated 08/13/24, documented the resident was cognitively intact. An OSDH incident report form, dated 11/01/24, documented Resident #47 reported to a dietary employee CNA #1 came to their room at approximately midnight on 11/01/24 during the 6:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. shift.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-12 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's power of attorney was notified of doctor appointments for one (#28) of two sampled residents reviewed for notifications. The administrator identified 79 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #28 had diagnoses which included cardiac arrhythmia and hypertension. A comprehensive assessment, dated 08/27/24, documented Resident #28 had moderately impaired cognition. A progress note, dated 10/23/24, documented the resident was out of the facility for a doctor's appointment via the transport team. The progress note documented at 1:10 p.m., the resident returned to the facility and a follow up appointment had been made for December 5th at 8:30 a.m. The note documented social services was made aware. On 11/07/24 at 9:58 a.m., Resident #28's POA reported they were still having an issue with not being notified of all the resident's scheduled doctors appointments. On 11/12/24 at 12:22 p.m., Social Services reported residents family members were notified of their doctors appointments when the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-12 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to refer residents with newly diagnosed mental illnesses to the OHCA and or LOCEU for a level II PASARR evaluation for one (#28) of three sampled residents reviewed for PASARR. The administrator identified 79 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A PASARR policy and procedure, dated 09/01/17, read in part, a new condition of intellectual disability or mental illness must be referred to the LOCEU by the nursing facility for determination of the need for the Level II assessment. Resident #28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident was diagnosed with anxiety disorder on 06/27/17 and schizoaffective disorder on 08/04/21. A comprehensive assessment, dated 08/27/24, documented moderately impaired cognition. The assessment also documented the use of antianxiety medication. The level I PASARR screen completed on admission was unavailable in the resident's medical record. The Order Summary report, dated 11/07/24, documented the following…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$14,867 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $14,867 — penalty dated 2024-11-12

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BRADFORD MONTGOMERY — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 95% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $533K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK