Hennessey Nursing & Rehab

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 36% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 50 beds and averages 29.8 residents a day — about 60% occupied, or roughly 20 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.50 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.36 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.37 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 64% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-04-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY On 04/11/24 an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to assess, monitor, and intervene for a resident experiencing a significant change in condition and ensure a resident received prescribed antibiotic therapy to treat pneumonia. 03/08/24 Resident #1 had acute change of condition, very weak, unable to stand/sit, 3-4 person assist to transfer, irregular HR, O2 sats 80%, incontinent B&B, and decline in mental status. MD notified. Not sent to ER. 03/19/24 Resident #1's condition deteriorates and they requested to be sent to ER. Returned from ER same day with DX: pneumonia and orders for Augmentin 875mg-125mg tab- 1 tab oral q12hrs x7days. Their physician was not notified of new order, the medication order was not submitted to the pharmacy, and the medication was not placed on the MAR. There was no documentation that Augmentin was ever ordered, received from the pharmacy, or given to the resident between 03/19/24 and 04/08/24. 03/26/24 Nursing staff documented…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2024-04-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately assess residents' risk for and initiate dietary measures to aide in the prevention of avoidable pressure ulcers for one (#1) of two sampled residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The Administrator identified 31 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #1 had diagnoses that included s/p amputation of left toes and PICC line in upper right arm. Resident #1's Care Plan documents, on 03/15/24, resident was at risk of nutritional decline and had lost 12 lbs. in a month. The RD completed a 'Nutrition Risk Assessment' for Resident #1, dated 03/18/24, with a risk score of NO/LOW RISK, and no interventions for prevention of pressure ulcers were put into place. Discrepancies in the RD assessment included: 1. RD documented no weight loss/gain- weight record documented a weight loss of <5% since admission. Resident #1's documented weights include 176 lbs. on 02/28/24, 172 lbs. on 03/11/24, 168 lbs. on 03/22/24, 164 lbs. on 03/27/24, and 160.5 lbs. on 04/05/24. 2. RD documented oral/nutrition intake meets…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-03-26 · tag F0577 — widespread
  Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to post the most recent state survey results in a place readily accessible to residents, family members, and legal representatives of the residents. The administrator identified 27 residents resided in the facility.Findings: On 03/25/26 at 11:27 a.m., the surveyor walked the halls and the lobby of the facility, there was no posting showing were to find the survey results binder. A Survey Results, Examination of policy, revised 04/2007, read in part, A copy of the most recent standard survey, including any subsequent extended surveys, follow-up revisits reports, etc., along with state approved plan of correction of noted deficiencies, is maintained in a 3-ring binder located in an area frequented by most residents, such as the main lobby or resident activity room. On 03/25/26 at 11:01 a.m., 10 resident council members present for the meeting stated they did not know where to find the state survey results. On 03/25/26 at 11:30 a.m., the Administrator stated there was a little card on the table where the results…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-03-26 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure RN coverage for eight consecutive hours seven days per week.The administrator identified 27 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Staffing policy, updated 10/2023, read in part, RN must be on duty 8 hours a day 7 days a week. A PBJ Staffing Data Report, dated 10/01/25 through 12/31/25, showed no RN hours on 10/13/25, 10/14/25, 10/27/25, 11/10/25, 11/11/25, 12/01/25, 12/06/25, and 12/18/25. An Employee Timecard Report dated 10/01/25 through 12/31/25, did not show the facility had RN hours for 8 consecutive hours on the following dates, 10/13/25, 10/14/25, 10/27/25, 11/10/25, 11/11/25, 12/01/25, 12/06/25, and 12/18/25. On 03/26/26 at 12:45 p.m., the MDS coordinator stated yes those are the only three RN's for the facility. They stated the facility did not have RN coverage on 10/13/25, 10/14/25, 10/27/25, 11/10/25, 11/11/25, 12/01/25, 12/06/25, or 12/18/25.On 03/26/26 at 1:04 p.m., the Administrator stated they were not aware the facility did not have coverage on 10/13/25, 10/14/25, 10/27/25, 11/10/25,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-03-26 · tag F0801 — widespread
  Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the food service supervisor completed certification as a certified dietary manager within three years of beginning employment per State requirement.The administrator identified 27 residents who received meals from the kitchen. Findings:The Food and Nutrition Services Staff policy, revised 10/20, read in part, Nutrition service manager if not already certified will be enrolled in an accredited/approved program within regulatory timeframe.An undated Employee Information Report, showed the dietary supervisor was hired on 02/04/20.There was no documentation the dietary supervisor had completed a certified program.On 03/23/26 at 1:47 p.m., the dietary supervisor stated they have not completed a certification course. On 03/26/26 at 9:35 a.m., the administrator stated they were aware the dietary supervisor was not certified. They stated the dietary supervisor was hired for their role on 02/04/20.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-26 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — pattern
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify a physician of a resident's change in condition for 1 (#24) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for self-administration of medication.The DON identified nine residents who received breathing treatments in the facility.Findings:The Acute Condition Changes-Clinical Protocol policy, revised 03/18, read in part, The nursing staff will contact the physician based on urgency of the situation.Resident #24's quarterly resident assessment, dated 01/27/26, showed the resident had diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and cough. It showed the resident's cognition was intact with a BIMS of 15.A physician's order, dated 02/03/26, showed ipratropium-albuterol (a bronchodilator breathing treatment) inhalation solution 0.5-2.5, 3 mg/3ml. Inhale one vial three times a day for wheezing.The March 2026 Orders Administration notes showed Resident #24 refused ipratropium-albuterol treatment on the;a. 4th at 8:46 p.m. due to, It makes me shake too bad,b. 5th at 9:04 p.m.,c. 9th at 8:48 p.m. due to, It makes me shake…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident had a physician order and an assessment to self-administer medications for 1 (#24) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for self-administration of medication.The DON identified nine residents who received breathing treatments in the facility.Findings:On 03/24/26 at 8:42 a.m., there were two vials of ipratropium bromide/albuterol sulfate 0.5-3 mg in 3 ml sitting on the Resident #24's bedside table.Resident #24's quarterly resident assessment, dated 01/27/26, showed the resident had diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and cough. It showed the resident's cognition was intact with a BIMS of 15.A physician's order, dated 02/03/26, showed ipratropium-albuterol (a bronchodilator breathing treatment) inhalation solution 0.5-2.5, 3 mg/3ml. Inhale one vial three times a day for wheezing.There was no documentation the Resident #24 had an assessment and a physician's order for self-medication administration.On 03/24/26 at 8:43 a.m., Resident #24 stated the nurse gave them the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the care plan was revised to show a new skin alteration for 1 (#28) of 3 residents reviewed for care plans.The administrator reported 27 residents resided in the facility.Findings:A Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered policy, revised 12/2016, read in part, Assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the residents and the residents' conditions of change. Resident #28's care plan, initiated on 03/06/25, showed resident had diagnoses which included cerebral palsy and major depressive disorder. An Incident Note, dated 12/04/25 at 12:01 p.m., read in part, During a transfer utilizing the mechanical lift [name withheld], the res stated, The chair pinched me.A review of Resident #28's care plan did not show documentation of a laceration. Upon transfer back to bed 3 superficial lacerations were noted to the gluteal area regions. An Incident Note, dated 12/04/25 at 4:00 p.m., read in part, New order received; Cleanse lacerations with wound cleaner and pat dry daily and as needed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's breathing treatment was accurately documented for 1 (#24) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for self-administration of medication.The DON identified nine residents who received breathing treatments in the facility.Findings:On 03/24/26 at 8:42 a.m., there were two vials of ipratropium bromide/ albuterol sulfate 0.5-3 mg in 3 ml sitting on the Resident #24's bedside table.The Charting and Documentation policy, revised 07/17, read in part, Documentation in the medical record will be objective (not opinionated or speculative), complete, and accurate.Resident #24's quarterly resident assessment, dated 01/27/26, showed the resident had diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and cough. It showed the resident's cognition was intact with a BIMS of 15.A physician's order, dated 02/03/26, showed ipratropium-albuterol (a bronchodilator breathing treatment) inhalation solution 0.5-2.5, 3 mg/3ml. Inhale one vial three times a day for wheezing.The March 2026 treatment administration…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-07 · tag F0700 — pattern
  Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to complete bed rail safety assessments, review the risks and benefits of bed rails with the resident or resident representative, and obtain informed consent prior to installation of bed rails for three (#13, #15, and #82) of three sampled residents with bed rails in use. The DON identified 33 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Bed Safety and Bed Rails' policy, revised August 2022, read in parts, .3. The use of bed rails or side rails .is prohibited unless the criteria for use of bed rails have been met, including .interdisciplinary evaluation, resident assessment, and informed consent . 1. On 08/04/24 at 12:25 p.m., Resident #13 was observed in bed with two upper bed rails raised. 2. On 08/04/24 at 2:05 p.m., Resident #15 was observed in bed with two upper bed rails raised. 3. On 08/05/24 at 12:58 p.m., Resident #82 was observed in bed with two upper bed rails raised. There was no documentation in the clinical records of Resident #13, #15, nor #82 that bed rail safety assessments had been completed,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-07 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations were offered for four (#15, 18, 22, and #82) of five residents reviewed for immunizations. The DON identified 33 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Immunization records for Residents #15, #18, #22, and #82 were reviewed. There was no documentation in their record the residents, nor their representatives had been offered or received an influenza or pneumonia immunization. On 08/07/24 at 9:41 a.m., the DON was asked if residents were offered influenza and pneumonia vaccines. They stated immunizations should be offered during admission process and annually. The DON acknowledged neither Resident #15, #18, #22, nor #82 or their representative had documentation in their clinical record showing they were offered nor received the influenza or pneumococcal vaccines.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-07 · tag F0622 — isolated
  Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were not involuntarily discharged for one (#30) of three sampled discharged residents. The DON identified 33 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #30 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included anxiety disorder, bipolar disorder, psychotic disorder, schizophrenia, and PTSD. A physician's order, dated 06/25/24 at 7:48 p.m., read in parts, .Transfer to VA hosp ER D/T behaviors . There was no documentation in the clinical record that the facility followed-up on Resident #30's status after he was transferred to the VA hospital ER and no documentation stating the resident had been discharged . On 08/06/24 at 9:33 a.m., the DON stated Resident #30 did not return to the facility because they were a danger to self and others due to their behaviors. They stated they could not meet Resident #30's needs at the facility. On 08/06/24 at 11:50 a.m., Nurse Consult. #1, who completed the transfer MDS for Resident #30, was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$33,924 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $33,924 — penalty dated 2024-04-15

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BRADFORD MONTGOMERY — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $290K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK