Gracewood Health & Rehab

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 15% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 121 beds and averages 70.4 residents a day — about 58% occupied, or roughly 51 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.92 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.36 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.89 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.73 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.00 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.38 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 76% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2026-04-06 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was not physically abused by another resident for 1 (#79) of 4 sampled residents reviewed for abuse.The administrator identified 69 residents resided in the facility.A Resident to Resident Incidents policy, dated 01/2024, read in part, Upon admission to the facility, each person will be assessed through the MDS process to determine if they are at risk for abusing others.Care plans will address interventions designed to prevent occurrences.An Oklahoma State Department of Health final report, dated 05/11/25, showed a staff member witnessed Resident #79 pour water on Resident #61. Resident #61 then pushed Resident #79 causing them to fall. Resident #79 was sent to the hospital.An undated nurse note showed that around 5:30 p.m., Resident #79 was found yelling and was on the ground in the smoking area. Resident #79 stated Resident #61 pushed them down. The note showed, We tried to get [Resident #79] up but [Resident #79] said [they] could not get up as [they] were in great pain. The note showed Resident #61…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-04-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure: a. food items were properly sealed, dated, and labeled; b. bulging containers were removed from circulation in the dry storage; c. ensure food preparation utensils were stored in a clean environment; and d. ensure areas near food preparation were clean and free from pests, including a microwave for resident use.The administrator identified 69 residents ate meals from the kitchen.Findings: On 03/31/26 at 10:15 a.m., kitchen utensils were observed to hang over the sink where dirty dishes were to be washed.On 03/31/26 at 10:18 a.m., the following items were observed in the refrigerator:A bag of square brown patties was observed with no label or date,a pitcher of orange liquid was observed with no label or date, a bag of chunks of meat with no label or date, a bag of tan circular patties was observed in an unsealed plastic bag with no label or date, anda cookie sheet of seven sandwiches was observed in the refrigerator with a date of 03/30/26 on the saran wrap, but the saran wrap was not sealed around the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview the facility failed to:a. ensure a safe and sanitary kitchen floor, b. residents were not served meals on paper products, andc. ensure hot water was available in their restroom for 1 (#21) of 17 sampled residents reviewed for access to hot water in their restroom. The administrator identified 69 residents ate from the kitchen. Findings: On 03/31/26 at 10:18 a.m., the tile floor between the two sinks on opposite sides of the kitchen was observed to have been ripped up and was filled in with gravel. On 03/31/26 at 11:01 a.m., [NAME] #2 stated All I can do is wipe down and sanitize as much as I can. A pipe busted that is what caused the flood and why the floor is busted and filled in with gravel.On 03/31/26 at 11:41 a.m., [NAME] #1 stated the floor had been filled in with gravel for a year since the flood happened. They stated they did the best they could to keep the floor clean.On 03/31/26 at 12:15 p.m., the food was observed to be plated onto paper plates. Plastic silverware was also observed.On 03/31/26 at 12:36 p.m., Resident # 21's restroom hot…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-06 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide a SNF ABN to 2 (#10 and #37) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for beneficiary notices. The administrator identified four residents discharged from the facility with Medicare benefit days remaining. Findings:1.A SNF Beneficiary Protection Notification Review form, showed Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on skilled services on 01/28/26, discharged from skilled services on 03/27/26, and remained in the facility.A SNF Beneficiary Protection Notification Review form, showed an ABN was not provided to the resident/representative.2.A SNF Beneficiary Protection Notification Review form, showed Resident #37 was admitted to the facility on skilled services on 12/29/25, discharged from skilled services on 03/27/26, and remained in the facility.A SNF Beneficiary Protection Notification Review showed an ABN was not provided to the resident/representative.On 04/06/26 at 2:12 p.m., LPN #2 stated they were not aware they had to have an ABN form if they remained in the facility after they were discharged from skilled…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure behaviors were addressed in the care plan for 1 (#61) of 17 sampled residents reviewed for care plans.The administrator identified 69 residents resided in the facility. An Oklahoma State Department of Health final report, dated 05/11/25, showed a staff member witnessed Resident #79 pour water on Resident #61. Resident #61 then pushed Resident #79 causing them to fall. An annual assessment, dated 02/23/26, showed Resident #61 had diagnoses which included bipolar, PTSD, depression, and anxiety. The assessment showed Resident #61 had a BIMS score of 12 which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. A nurse's note, dated 03/06/26, showed Resident #61 became upset when they were unable to go smoke during a tornado warning. Resident #61 threw water in the hall and onto another resident. A nurse's note, dated 03/07/26, showed Resident #61 tried to steal cigarettes from the bucket at the nurses station with the LPN at the desk. When Resident #61 was told to stop, they kicked the bucket, and grabbed the nurses forearm.A…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision to prevent an elopement for 1 (#20) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for elopement.The administrator identified 21 residents resided in the memory care unit.Findings:On 03/31/26 at 11:29 a.m., Resident #20 was observed resting in bed with their eyes closed. No elopement behaviors were observed. On 04/01/26 at 9:37 a.m., Resident #20 was observed resting in bed with their cover pulled up over their head. No elopement behaviors were observed. On 04/01/26 at 1:55 p.m., Resident #20 was observed walking out of their room in their pajamas. Res #20 was pleasant and easily redirected to their room by staff to get dressed. No elopement behaviors were observed. An undated face sheet showed Resident #20 admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included Alzheimer's, dementia, protein-calorie malnutrition, and hypertension. An Elopement Risk Assessment, dated 01/09/26, showed Resident #20 was not an elopement risk. An admission assessment, dated 01/19/26, showed Resident #20 did not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions were implemented for 1 (#11) of 1 sampled resident with a PEG tube observed during medication administration.The DON identified two residents had PEG tubes.Findings:On 04/01/26 at 2:00 p.m., LPN #1 was observed during administration of medications to Resident #11 through their PEG tube. LPN #1 was not observed to have utilized PPE, except for gloves. Signage indicating EBPs and required PPE was not observed near the resident's room. The Enhanced Barrier Precautions policy, dated August 2022, read in part, Enhanced barrier precautions (EBPs) are utilized to prevent the spread of multi-drug resistant organisms to residents.EBPs employ targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities when contact precautions do not otherwise apply.Examples of high-contact resident care activities requiring the use of gown and gloves for EBPs include .device care or use ( .feeding tube .) .Signs are posted on the door or wall outside the resident room indicating the type…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-14 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with privacy curtains. The administrator identified 78 residents resided at the facility. Findings: A Bedrooms policy, reviewed May 2024, read in part, Each room is designed to provide full visual privacy for each resident (in the form of ceiling suspended curtains that extend around the bed) and equipped for adequate nursing care On 01/06/25 at 4:26 p.m., room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed to have no privacy curtain. Resident #24 stated there was no privacy and all activities other than using the restroom were completed in full view of their roommate. On 01/07/25 at 11:52 a.m., room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed to have no privacy curtain. The room had two residents residing in the room. On 01/09/25 at 10:44 a.m., LPN #3 stated a curtain should be in room [ROOM NUMBER] to provide privacy and they did not know why one was not installed. On 01/09/25 at 11:09 a.m., the DON stated one of the resident's in room [ROOM…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-14 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure activities were provided for four (#18, 22, 26, and #42) of four sampled residents who were reviewed for activities. The administrator identified 78 residents who resided at the facility. Findings: An Activity Programs policy, revised August 2024, read in parts, Activity programs designed to meet the needs of each resident are available on a daily basis .designed to encourage maximum individual participation and are geared to the individual resident's needs .are scheduled 7 (seven) days a week. 1. Resident #18 had diagnoses which included chronic pain, obesity, and limited mobility. On 01/06/25 at 11:18 a.m., Resident #18 stated they could not go to activities because they did not have a wheelchair that worked. They stated the bottom of the wheelchair had a hole in it and was not comfortable, so they did not get up much. On 01/07/25 at 3:46 p.m., CNA #1 stated they did not know if activities were offered or not. On 01/07/25 at 3:47 p.m., RN #1 stated there was an activities person, but they did not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-14 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure pharmacist medication regimen reviews were conducted monthly for five (#24, 57, 62, 22, and #59) of five sampled residents who were reviewed for unnecessary medications. The DON identified 78 residents who received medications in the facility. Findings: The Medication Regimen Reviews policy, dated May 2024, read in parts, The Consultant Pharmacist reviews the medication regimen of each resident at least monthly .The Consultant Pharmacist provides the Director of Nursing Services and Medical Director with a written, signed and dated copy of all medication regimen reports .Copies of medication regimen review reports .are maintained as part of the permanent medical record. 1. Resident #24 had diagnoses which included schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type. The Care Plan, dated 12/09/24, read in part, Monitor pharmacist's drug regimen review for identification of potential drug interactions. Review of the clinical record and the monthly medication regimen reviews provided by the DON did not reveal the pharmacist had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to: a. ensure medications were secured for one (300 hall treatment cart) of six medication carts observed; b. ensure medications were dated when opened and/or insulin was discarded after 28 days for two (200 hall treatment cart and 300 hall treatment cart) of three medication carts observed; and c. ensure expired medications were not in use for one (100 hall medication cart) of three medication carts observed. LPN #2 identified six medication carts in the facility. Findings: The Medication Storage policy, dated 07/21/24, read in parts, The facility shall not use .outdated .drugs or biologicals .Compartments (including .carts .) shall be locked when not in use. 1. On 01/07/25 at 4:34 p.m., RN #2 was observed during medication administration to prepare insulin and enter room [ROOM NUMBER]. The 300 hall treatment cart was observed to be left unattended and unlocked. On 01/07/25 at 4:35 p.m., RN #2 was observed to walk to the nurses station to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BRADFORD MONTGOMERY — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $232K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK