Lakeview Nursing & Rehab

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.07 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 3% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 70 beds and averages 51.3 residents a day — about 73% occupied, or roughly 19 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.72 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.18 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.47 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.54 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.79 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.17 to 0.18 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · K2022-07-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY On 07/06/22 an immediate jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to provide supervision to prevent falls and to consistently identify and implement interventions to prevent falls for Res #15, 24, and #30. Resident #15 fell multiple times including one where the Res had sustained a laceration to the right leg which required sutures and subsequently became infected and required further hospitalization. Res #24 fell multiple times and with one fall received a large bump to the upper right forehead and was later found face down in the floor of another resident's room. Res #24 was not responsive and subsequently sent to the hospital for evaluation. Res #24 continued to fall. Res #30 had fallen multiple times with different injuries including one where the Res had sustained a hematoma to his right eyebrow. A week later Res #30 was sent to the hospital for evaluation of seizure like activity. On return from the hospital, Res #30 continued to fall. On 07/06/22 at 2:10 p.m., OSDH…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the deep fryer was clean and free of food particles and the splash guard on side of stove was cleaned routinely. The administrator identified 55 residents resided in facility and received their food from the kitchen. Findings: A Sanitization policy, revised October 2008, read in part, the food service area shall be maintained in a clean and sanitary manner, and for fixed equipment, the removable components will be scraped to remove food particle accumulation. On 02/10/25 at 10:20 a.m., a tour of the kitchen was conducted. The deep fryer was dirty with dried food particles and there was an accumulation of grease on the splash guard attached to the stove. On 02/11/25 at 8:53 a.m., a tour of the kitchen was conducted. The deep fryer was dirty with dried food particles and there was an accumulation of grease on the splash guard attached to the stove. On 02/11/25 at 8:56 a.m., dietary aide #1 was asked when was the deep fryer and the side of the stove cleaned. They stated they thought the food was from last…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a referral to the LOCEU was made when a resident had a diagnosis of a serious mental illness for one (#30) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for PASARR. The administrator identified 55 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #30 had diagnoses which included schizoaffective disorder and anxiety disorder. A PASARR form, dated 03/03/22, showed the resident did not have a diagnosis of a serious mental illness. The care plan, dated 09/24/24, showed the resident received psychotropic medication. An annual assessment, dated 12/20/24, showed the resident had a psychiatric/mood disorder. The assessment showed the resident was not currently considered by the state level II PASARR process to have a serious mental illness and/or intellectual disability or a related condition. On 02/11/25 at 3:06 p.m., MDS/PASARR coordinator #1 stated the level l was correct, but with a new diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder a level ll referral should have been made.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure an insulin vial was cleaned prior to administration for 1 (#27) of 1 sampled resident observed for insulin administration. The assistant director of nursing identified four residents received insulin. Findings: A Specific Medication Administration policy, dated April 2018, showed staff were to clean the stopper and the top of the vial, with an alcohol pad, and allow it to air dry. On 02/11/25 at 10:42 a.m., LPN #1 was observed to prepare an insulin injection for Resident #27. They did not clean the top of the insulin vial prior to drawing up the insulin. On 02/11/25 at 10:44 a.m., LPN #1 administered the insulin to Resident #27. On 02/11/25 at 10:47 a.m., LPN #1 stated they were supposed to clean the top of the insulin vial but, forgot.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to prepare and distribute food under sanitary conditions. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report documented 38 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A policy titled Preventing Foodborne Illness- Employee Hygiene and Sanitary Practices documented .Hair nets or caps and/or beard restraints must be worn to keep hair from contacting exposed food, clean equipment, utensils and linens .Employees must wash their hands: .After handling soiled equipment or utensils .During food preparation, as often as necessary to remove soil and contamination and prevent cross contamination when changing tasks .After engaging in other activities that contaminate the hands . On 10/17/23 at 12:08 p.m., Dietary Aide #1 was assisting with preparation of the cart for the hall. A lid covering a meal plate fell off the cart to the floor. The aide picked up the lid and returned it to cover the plate. On 10/17/23 at 12:13 p.m., Dietary [NAME] #1 was observed in the kitchen serving the noon meal. The cook had a beard that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-10-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to assist a resident with ADLs for one (#18) of 12 residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report documented 38 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A policy titled Safe Lifting and Movement of Residents documented .Staff responsible for direct resident care will be trained in the use of manual (gait/transfer belts, lateral boards) and mechanical lifting devices .Mechanical lifting devices shall be used for heavy lifting, including lifting and moving residents when necessary . Res #18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Huntington's disease, anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder. A quarterly assessment, dated 09/07/23, documented the resident was moderately impaired for daily decision making and required extensive to total assistance with ADLs. The care plan, last reviewed on 09/07/23, documented the resident required assistance with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-07-07 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Res #42 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included diabetes mellitus and hypertension. A history and physical note, dated [DATE], documented in part, .Code status: DNR/no CPR . Physician progress notes, dated [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], and [DATE], read in parts, .Code status: Do not attempt Resuscitation (DNR/No CPR) . On [DATE] at 9:45 a.m., Res #42's chart was observed with a sticker on the spine of the chart that read DNR. A review of Res #42's medical records revealed no DNR document was in the chart. On [DATE] at 2:13 p.m., the administrator stated a signed DNR form should have been in the medical records. The administrator reported Res #42 would have to be a full code until a DNR document could be obtained. Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure accurate documentation of residents' code status for two (#30 and #42) of two residents reviewed for advanced directives. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 50 residents…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-07-07 · tag F0582 — pattern
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview the facility failed to provide letters of NOMNC and/or ABN for two (#12 and #21) of three residents reviewed Beneficiary Notices. The Beneficiary Notice - Residents discharged Within the Last Six Months, documented 20 residents were discharged from Medicare covered Part A stay with benefit days remaining in the last six months. Findings: 1. The ''SNF Beneficiary Protection Notification Review form, documented Res #21 was admitted to Part A skilled services on 01/25/22, discharged from Part A skilled services on 02/19/22, and remained in the facility. The facility did not provide Res #21 with a NOMNC or ABN letter. 2. The ''SNF Beneficiary Protection Notification Review form, documented Res #12 was admitted to Part A skilled services on 05/07/22, discharged from Part A skilled services on 05/17/22, and remained in the facility. The facility did not provide Res #12 with an ABN letter. On 07/05/22 at 4:23 p.m., the administrator stated the discharge for Res #21 occurred in February and a corporate nurse was responsible for completing and providing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-07-07 · tag F0645 — pattern
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure three (#24, 30, and #42) of four residents whose PASRR documents were reviewed. The administrator reported 35 residents who resided in the facility required a Level II PASRR. Findings: 1. Res #42 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included mood disorder and depression. A review of the resident's medical records revealed no PASRR level I was documented. On 07/07/22 at 8:48 a.m., the administrator provided a PASRR, dated 07/06/22. The administrator stated the PASRR for Res #42 had not been done upon admit. The administrator stated the PASRR was done on 07/06/22 and should have been done upon admission. 2. Res #24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia with behavioral disturbance and psychotic disorders. A PASRR level I report, dated 12/04/2020, did not indicate the resident had a serious mental illness. A quarterly assessment, dated 05/18/22, documented the resident was severely impaired with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-07-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed develop a comprehensive care plan which included goals and interventions for three (#15, 30 and #35) of 21 residents whose care plans were reviewed. The facility failed to develop a care plan related to: a. the use of a urinary catheter for Res #15. b. pressure ulcers for Res #30. c. bathing needs for Res #35. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents documented 50 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Res #15 had diagnoses which included osteoarthritis, embolism of deep veins of the lower extremities, pulmonary embolism, and morbid obesity. A care plan for Res #15, dated 04/14/22, documented Res #15 had occasional urinary incontinence and would have no further decline in urinary continence through the next review period. A quarterly assessment, dated 05/11/22, documented Res #15 had a urinary catheter. On 06/29/22 at 9:19 a.m., Res #15 stated she received a urinary catheter when was in the hospital in April and the facility had not attempted to remove it. Res #15 stated she did not know why she…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-07-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to update resident care plans to accurately address the residents' current needs for four (#15, 21, 24, 30, and #40) of 21 residents whose records were reviewed. The facility failed to update resident care plan related to: a. falls for resident #15, 21, 24, and #30. b. code status and use of hypnotic medications for Res #40. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 50 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Res #15 had diagnoses which included osteoarthritis, embolism of deep veins of the lower extremities, pulmonary embolism, and morbid obesity. A care plan, dated 12/03/20, documented Res #15 was at risk for falls. The plan of care did not document a goal or interventions to prevent falls. An incident report, dated 07/22/21, documented Res #15 had attempted to transfer from bed to BSC and appeared to have lost her balance. The report documented Res #15 hit her head on the bathroom door and sustained a small…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BRADFORD MONTGOMERY — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 92% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $215K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK