Heavener Nursing & Rehab

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 39 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 18.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 27 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 84 beds and averages 71.5 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.59 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.18 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.83 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.06 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.80 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.16 to 0.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

35 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2022-11-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  On 11/07/22, an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to ensure the physician provided laboratory orders for routine monitoring for Res #63 who received Warfarin/Coumadin (an anticoagulant medication used as a blood thinner). On 11/07/22 at 4:30 p.m., the Oklahoma State Department of Health was notified and verified the existence of the IJ situation. On 11/07/22 at 4:45 p.m., the Regional Manager was notified of the IJ situation. On 11/08/22 at 11:30 a.m., an acceptable plan of removal was submitted to the Oklahoma State Department of Health. The facility's plan of removal, dated 11/07/22, read in part: Plan of Removal Anticoagulant Therapy: Immediate Actions: 1. Review of facility records identified 3 residents on Coumadin therapy with identified resident #63 out to hospital. 2. Inservice started for Nursing staff regarding the following: a. Coumadin (Anticoagulant therapy Clinical Protocol P&P) b. Lab requirements for anticoagulant therapy to include routine draws of PT/INR c. Ensuring Physician [sic] orders are obtained for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2022-11-08 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  On 11/07/22, an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to ensure the pharmacist conducted a MRR (Medication Regime Review) specific to Warfarin/Coumadin (a blood thinner) and lab monitoring from 03/03/22 to 10/26/22 for Res #63 who received Warfarin. On 11/07/22 at 4:30 p.m., the Oklahoma State Department of Health was notified and verified the existence of the IJ situation. On 11/07/22 at 4:45 p.m., the Regional Manager was notified of the IJ situation. On 11/08/22 at 11:30 a.m., an acceptable plan of removal was submitted to the Oklahoma State Department of Health. The facility's plan of removal, dated 11/07/22, read in part: Plan of Removal Anticoagulant Therapy: Immediate Actions: 1. Review of facility records identified 3 residents on Coumadin therapy with identified resident #63 out to hospital. 2. Inservice started for Nursing staff regarding the following: a. Coumadin (Anticoagulant therapy Clinical Protocol P&P) b. Lab requirements for anticoagulant therapy to include routine draws of PT/INR c. Ensuring Physician orders…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2026-06-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident did not physically abuse another resident for 1 (#11) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The DON identified 69 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An undated Abuse Policy and Procedure, read in part, We will endeavor to protect our occupants from maltreatment, which means any exploitation, neglect, physical abuse, sexual abuse, neglect, and the misappropriation of property. A nurse progress note, dated 12/22/25, showed Resident #11 tried to take a plate of food from another unnamed resident. The unnamed resident refused to release the tray. The note showed Resident #11 grabbed the unnamed resident's arm and clawed them. The altercation resulted in a skin tear to unnamed resident's right forearm with moderate bleeding. The note showed the two residents then tried to hit each other but were separated by CNAs and nurse. The note showed Resident #11 had been up all night wandering around taking things that were not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control was maintained during finger stick blood sugar checks and insulin injections for 7 (#12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, and #18) of 7 sampled residents observed for infection control. The regional consultant identified 19 residents required finger stick blood sugar checks. Findings: On 06/10/26 at 12:02 p.m., LPN #1 was observed obtaining Resident #12's FSBS. LPN #1 lanced Resident #12's finger and obtained a blood sample using a glucometer. LPN #1 was not observed to have cleaned the glucometer after the procedure. On 06/10/26 at 12:04 p.m., LPN #1 was observed obtaining Resident #13's FSBS. LPN #1 lanced Resident #13's finger and obtained a blood sample using a glucometer. LPN #1 was not observed to have cleaned the glucometer after the procedure. On 06/10/26 at 12:08 p.m., LPN #1 was observed administering an insulin injection to Resident #13. LPN #1 was not observed to have worn gloves during the insulin injection. On 06/10/26 at 12:10 p.m., LPN #1 was observed obtaining Resident #14's FSBS. LPN #1 lanced…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to report an allegation of physical abuse for 1 (#11) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for abuse. The DON identified 69 residents resided in the facility. An undated Abuse Policy and Procedure, read in part, All allegations of resident maltreatment, including neglect, physical abuse .shall be promptly reported to Administrator and investigated by Facility management. Administrator will immediately report the allegation to the Oklahoma State Department of Health and the Local Police. An Acknowledgement of Resident Rights Training which includes Abuse, Neglect, Misappropriation of Property and Burnout, signed by RN #1 on 08/23/25, read in part, I understand the definition of abuse .I also understand when and to whom I am to report any violation of resident rights and what my participation is expected to be during any investigation of an allegation of such. Two actions to be taken immediately are stopping the abuse and reporting it to my…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0564 — isolated
  Inform each resident of his or her visitation rights and ensure that all visitors enjoy equal visitation privileges.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were allowed to have visitors of their choice for 1 (#1) of 3 sampled who were reviewed for visitation. The administrator identified 71 residents resided in the facility. Resident #1's face sheet, dated 01/22/25, showed the resident had diagnoses which included depression and hypertension. A quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed the residents cognition was moderately impaired with a BIMS score of 11. An undated policy titled, Visitation, read in part, 2. The facility provides 24-hour access to all individuals visiting with the consent of the resident. On 05/21/25 at 8:20 a.m., Resident #1 stated their grandson would not allow the resident's daughter to visit them in their room. Resident #1 stated they had discussed this with the social services director but nothing was done about it. Resident #1 stated they would like to have their daughter visit in their room for privacy, but their grandson had told the staff they wanted a witness to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-03 · tag F0636 — pattern
  Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive assessment was completed within fourteen days after admission for 2 (#58 and #70) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for assessments. The regional director of operations identified four residents who had been admitted to the facility in the last 30 days. Findings: 1. Res #58 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included type II diabetes mellitus and bipolar disorder. The clinical record contained no comprehensive admission assessment. 2. Res #70 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Parkinson's disease and protein-calorie malnutrition. The clinical record contained no comprehensive admission assessment. On 04/03/25 at 1:20 p.m. the MDS coordinator stated they were behind in completing comprehensive admission assessments. They stated a comprehensive admission assessment for Res #58 and Res #70 had not been completed since admission. The MDS coordinator stated the comprehensive admission assessment for Res #58…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-03 · tag F0638 — pattern
  Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facilty failed to ensure a quarterly assessment was completed for 5 (#23, 27, 40, 41, and #46) of 13 residents sampled for MDS assessments. The regional director of operations identified 65 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Res #23 had an annual assessment dated [DATE]. A quarterly assessment with a reference date of 01/19/25 was not completed. 2. Res #27 had an annual assessment dated [DATE]. A quarterly assessment with an assessment reference date of 01/06/25 was not completed. 3. Res #40 had a discharge-return anticipated assessment dated [DATE] and an entry assessment dated [DATE]. A quarterly assessment with an assessment reference date of 12/11/24 was not completed. 4. Res #41 had a significant change assessment dated [DATE]. A quarterly assessment with a reference date of 02/26/25 was not completed. 5. Res #46 had a quarterly assessment dated [DATE]. A quarterly assessment with a reference date of 01/08/25 was not completed. On 04/03/25 at 1:05 p.m.,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed: a. upon admission to the facility for 2 (#58 and #70) of 2 residents sampled for new admissions; b. for bed rail use for 2 (#13 and #41) of 2 residents sampled for accidents; and c. for hospice services for 1 (#46) of 1 resident sampled for hospice services. The regional director of operations identified 65 residents resided in the facility. They identified four residents who were admitted in the last thirty days. Findings: 1. Res #58 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included type II diabetes mellitus and bipolar disorder. The clinical record contained no comprehensive care plan. 2. Res #70 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Parkinson's disease and protein-calorie malnutrition. The clinical record contained no comprehensive care plan. On 04/03/25 at 1:29 p.m. the MDS coordinator stated they were behind in developing care plans. They stated a comprehensive care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-03 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident who entered the facility with an indwelling urinary catheter had a physician order and was assessed for the use for 1 (#7) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for the use of an indwelling urinary catheter. The DON identified 11 residents with indwelling urinary catheters. Findings: On 03/31/25 at 1:10 p.m., the resident was lying in a low bed and had a indwelling urinary catheter hanging from their bedside. Resident #7 had diagnoses which included urinary tract infection and diabetes mellitus. A 5 day assessment, dated 02/13/25, showed the resident was cognitively intact and had a BIMS score 12. The assessment showed the resident was always continent of bladder. A treatment administration record/medication administration record for April 2025 did not show catheter care for the resident. There was no current physician order for an indwelling catheter when Resident #7 returned from the hospital on [DATE]. On 03/31/25 at 1:14…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-03 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide all monthly medication regimen reviews from January 2024 through February 2025 for 5 (#20, 23, 37, 41, and #49) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The DON identified 65 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A policy titled Monthly Medication Regimen Reviews, revised May 2024, read in part, The Consultant Pharmacist performs a medication regimen review (MRR) for every resident in the facility receiving medications. Medication regimen reviews are done upon admission (or as close to admission as possible) and at least monthly thereafter, or more frequently if indicated .Copies of medication regimen review reports, including physician responses, are maintained as part of the permanent medical record. 1. Res #49 was admitted with diagnoses which included dementia and bipolar disorder. A quarterly assessment, dated 11/30/24, showed Res #49 was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 14 and had no depression or behaviors. The assessment showed Res #49 received antipsychotic,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to label and date food items in the walk in refrigerator. The dietary manager identified 65 residents who ate meals prepared by the kitchen. Findings: On 03/31/25 at 10:44 a.m., a kitchen observation was made. The walk in refrigerator had a container with scrambled eggs and two sausage links that were not labeled or dated. There was a container of meat in six plastic bags, with one open to air, that were not labeled or dated. There was a large container not labeled or dated the DM identified as vanilla pudding. A policy titled Food Receiving and Storage, revised October 2024, read in part All foods stored in the refrigerator or freezer will be covered, labeled and dated ('use by' date). On 03/31/25 at 10:50 a.m., the DM stated items in the refrigerator should be labeled and dated.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program for EBPs for 3 (#7, 12, and #70) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for infection control practices. The DON identified 11 residents with indwelling urinary catheters, six residents with wounds, and one resident with a PEG tube. Findings: A policy titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions, dated August 2022, read in part, Enhanced barrier precautions (EBPs) are used as an infection prevention and control intervention to reduce the spread of multi-drug resistant organisms (MDROs) to residents. EBPs employ targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities when contact precautions do not otherwise apply.Examples of high-contact resident care activities requiring the use of gown and gloves for EBPs include: .g. device care or use (central line, urinary catheter, feeding tube, tracheostomy/ventilator .and h. wound care (any skin opening requiring a dressing). 1. On 04/01/25 at 2:20 p.m., LPN #1 was observed gathering supplies to complete wound care for Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BRADFORD MONTGOMERY — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 4 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $303K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK