Lindsay Nursing & Rehab

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Met the expected recovery: 81.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 22 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.03 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 1% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 106 beds and averages 74.0 residents a day — about 70% occupied, or roughly 32 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.39 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.19 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.42 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.23 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.46 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.19 to 0.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure portable oxygen cylinders were not stored unsecured in a resident's closet for 1 (#1) of 4 sampled residents reviewed for oxygen storage which had the potential to cause a severe fire hazard. The administrator identified 11 residents in the facility used oxygen. Findings:An undated Oxygen Storage and Safety policy, provided by the administrator on 04/14/26, showed full cylinders must be stored in a designated, well-ventilated area. The policy showed empty cylinders must be stored separately and labeled Empty. The policy showed oxygen in resident rooms must be secured to prevent tipping. The policy showed routine checks will be conducted to ensure proper storage and safety.An annual assessment for Resident #1, dated 01/13/26, showed the resident's cognition was intact with a BIMS score of 15. The assessment showed Resident #1 was independent with activities of daily living. The assessment showed Resident #1 received oxygen therapy and had diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's care plan was updated with interventions for safe storage of portable oxygen cylinders for 1 (#1) of 4 sampled residents reviewed for oxygen therapy. The administrator identified 11 residents used oxygen in the facility. Findings: On 04/14/26 at 9:20 a.m., Resident #1's room was observed to have 25 small cylinders of oxygen stored in their closet. The oxygen cylinders were observed standing up and tipped over on the floor of Resident #1's closet.On 04/14/26 at 1:30 p.m., the DON was asked to check the oxygen cylinders in Resident #1's closet to ensure they were empty. The DON was observed to check some of the oxygen cylinders. Two oxygen cylinders were observed to be full.A policy titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, dated 12/01/16, read in part, Assessments of residents are ongoing, and care plans are revised as information about the residents and the residents' conditions change.An annual assessment for Resident #1, dated 01/13/26, showed the resident's cognition was intact…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-02 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from verbal abuse by a staff member for 1 (#1) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for abuse.The administrator identified 76 residents resided in the facility. Findings:On 03/30/26 at 11:45 a.m., Resident #1 was up in a wheelchair and self-propelled into the dining room.An undated Abuse Prevention Program policy, read in part, As part of the resident abuse prevention, the administration will: 1. Protect our residents from abuse by anyone including, but not limited to: facility staff, other residents, consultants, volunteers, staff from other agencies, family members, legal representatives, friends, visitors, or any other individuals.A quarterly assessment, dated 02/03/26, showed Resident #1's cognition was intact with a BIMS score of 15. The assessment showed Resident #1 was independent with most ADLs and they had an indwelling urinary catheter. The assessment showed the resident had a diagnosis of paraplegia.A grievance form, dated 02/26/26, showed Resident #1 approached RN #1 on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-02 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of abuse was reported to OSDH within the required 2-hour timeframe for 1 (#1) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The administrator identified 76 residents resided in the facility. Findings:On 03/30/26 at 11:45 a.m., Resident #1 was observed up in a wheelchair and self-propelled into the dining room.The Abuse Prevention Program policy, not dated, read in part, Investigate and report any allegations of abuse within timeframes as required by federal requirements.A quarterly assessment, dated 02/03/26, showed Resident #1's cognition was intact with a BIMS score of 15. The assessment showed Resident #1 was independent with most ADL and had an indwelling catheter. The assessment showed the resident had a diagnosis of paraplegia.An incident report form, dated 02/25/26, showed an allegation of abuse for Resident #1 was faxed to OSDH on 02/26/26 at 11:16 a.m.A grievance form, dated 02/26/26, showed Resident #1 approached RN#1 on 02/25/26 to discuss their catheter bag. The form showed RN #1…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure supervision to prevent an elopement for 1 (#6) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for elopement. The DON identified two residents at risk for wandering/elopement. Findings: On 06/30/25 at 2:05 p.m., Res #6 was observed ambulating independently in the hallway outside of their room. No exit-seeking behavior was observed. An undated policy titled Wandering and Elopement Prevention, read in part, It is the policy of facility to identify residents at risk for wandering and/or elopement and to implement appropriate interventions to ensure their safety. The facility will take reasonable steps to prevent unauthorized exits and promote a safe and secure environment for all residents. A medical diagnosis list, dated 05/29/25, showed Res #6 admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included hypertension and hyperlipidemia. A nursing note, dated 05/30/25, showed Res #6 had decreased awareness and required frequent redirection. The note showed Res #6 was wandering around the facility and looking for their truck in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-12-18 · tag F0582 — pattern
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide a Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNF ABN) form to three (#13, #53, and #56) of three residents reviewed for beneficiary notification. The Administrator reported 63 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Resident #56 was admitted to Part A skilled services on 05/07/24 and discharged from skilled services on 07/26/24. 2. Resident #53 was admitted to Part A skilled services on 09/19/24 and discharged from skilled services on 09/11/24. 3. Resident #13 was admitted to Part A skilled services on 11/18/24 and discharged from skilled services on 12/11/24. On 12/17/24 at 12:58 p.m., the MDS coordinator and DON provided documentation to be reviewed for beneficiary notification. The DON reported no SNF ABN form was provided to residents #13, #53, #56, and/or their representative. The DON reported the facility had not been completing a SNF ABN form for residents or providing this information in any form. On 12/17/24 at 1:03 p.m., RN #1 reported the SNF ABN form was previously…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to prevent elopement for one (#1) of two sampled residents reviewed for adequate supervision to prevent elopement. The administrator stated one resident elopement in the previous 60 days. Findings: An Elopements policy, dated December 2007, read in part, .Staff shall promptly report any resident who tries to leave the premises or is suspected of being missing to the Charge Nurse or Director of Nursing .If an employee discovers that a resident is missing from the facility .Determine if the resident is out on an authorized leave or pass .initiate a search of the building(s) and premises .initiate an extensive search of the surrounding area .When the resident returns to the facility, the Director of Nursing Services or Charge Nurse shall .Examine the resident for injuries .Complete and file an incident report .Document relevant information in the resident's medical record . Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-07 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to issue a written grievance decision upon request and to address the grievance in its entirety for one (#4) of one sampled grievance reviewed. Findings: A Grievance Policy and Procedure, not dated, documented, the facility has adopted an internal grievance procedure providing a prompt and equitable resolution or complaints/grievances. A copy of the written summary of the report will also be provided to the resident, if requested, and the original copy will be filed in the Business Office. The investigation and report may include the following: Patient's account of the alleged incident; employees account of the alleged incident; recommendations for corrective action. A Grievance Form, dated 06/12/24, documented, [Staff member #1] was being rude about smokers past the line. He also stated [staff member #1] would push them past the line. Res #4 said if something wasn't done, they will move out though they prefer not too [sic]. Name/Title of person accepting this form: Activity Manager. Nature of resolution: [Staff member #1]…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-07 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to conduct a thorough abuse investigation for one (#4) of three sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The Administrator reported 68 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The facility Abuse Policy and Procedure not dated, read in part, It recognizes resident rights to be free from physical, or mental abuse, corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, and any chemical and physical restraints as defined by federal regulations. The policy also read, Immediate reporting. Facility employee or immediate supervisor, who will report incidents immediately to local police and report to the Oklahoma State Department of Health as required by State law or regulation. The policy also read, Identification and Investigation. The investigation should determine whether an incident has occurred, to what extent the resident was mistreated, by whom, and the measures needed to protect occupants from further incidents. The policy also read, Interviews. The investigator should consider interviewing persons listed below: facility employees,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident at risk for elopement did not elope from the facility for one (#1) of one sampled resident reviewed for elopement. The Administrator reported 68 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An Elopements policy, dated 12/01/2007, read in part Staff shall investigate and report all cases of missing residents .The facility will encourage each resident to sign themselves out of the facility so that the facility will remain informed .When the resident returns to the facility, the DON or Charge Nurse should complete and file an incident report . A form, dated 10/03/19, presented by the Administrator for the illicit drug policy and procedure, read in part It is the policy of the [facility name removed] to prohibit the use of alcoholic beverages or illicit drugs on facility property unless prescribed by a physician .There is a concern with interaction of prescribed medications and the use of alcoholic beverages and/or illicit drugs .Residents who have been found to be in violation of facility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BRADFORD MONTGOMERY — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 84% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $460K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK