Gardens At Camp Hill, The
46 Erford Road, Camp Hill, PA 17011 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 95 certified beds · (717) 763-7361 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Nov 2024
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (43) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $10,059 in federal fines (most recent 2023-09-28)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 17.2% | 16.8% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.9% | 6.2% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.7% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.3% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 3.0% | 10.8% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.3% | 3.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 19.0% | 17.0% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 14.0% | 20.0% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 94.0% | 93.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.9% | 4.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 27.0% | 25.5% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 20.7% | 17.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 6.8% | 1.4% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 28.2% | 68.7% | 79.4% | worse |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
31.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 29 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.17 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 16% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 31.7%CMS range 20.1–46.6 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.6%CMS range 7.8–17.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.83 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 95 beds and averages 81.9 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.40 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.99 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.87 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.28 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.44 on weekdays — 5% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.12 to 0.67 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
43 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 32 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2023-09-28 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the pharmacy contract, medication guide review, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to accurately acquire, receive, dispense, and administer drugs to meet the needs of each resident, which resulted in one resident not receiving their seizure medication and suffering from a seizure, for one of 24 residents reviewed (Resident 240). Findings include: Review of the Pharmacy Products and Services agreement, dated February 1, 2018, read, in part, the pharmacy shall provide pharmacy products to the facility and its residents in a prompt and timely manner. The facility will order exclusively from Pharmacy all pharmacy products and services required for individual residents. Pharmacy may assign its rights and delegate its duties and obligations under the Agreement to any other licensed entity which is owned, directly or indirectly, provided that Facility is within the geographic service area of such assignee. Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-07-01 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain consent prior to searching a resident's personal possessions for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Resident Rights last revised June 2023, read, in part, Employees shall treat all residents with kindness, respect, and dignity. Federal and state laws guarantee certain basic rights to all residents of this facility. These rights include the resident's right to: a dignified existence, and retain and use personal possessions to the maximum extent the space and safety permit. Review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included pain and difficulty in walking. During an interview with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) on July 1, 2026, at 10:03 AM, he revealed about two weeks ago he was informed that Resident 1 had a camera in his room, so he and Employee 1 (Maintenance) went to Resident 1's room to search his room. Resident 1 was at an outing for residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to store food and beverages and utilize kitchen equipment in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the main kitchen. Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Policy: Storage Areas last reviewed June 5, 2025, read, in part, The kitchen manager will retain temperature logs for 12 months. Plastic containers with tight-fitting covers must be used for storing cereals, flour, and broken lots of bulk food. All containers must be legible and accurately labeled and dated. Scoops are not to be stored in food or ice containers but are kept covered in a protected area near the containers. Observation in the main kitchen on July 7, 2025, at 6:38 AM, revealed a container of bran flake cereal labeled use by May 21, 2025. Observation in the four-door reach in refrigerator on July 7, 2025, at 6:40 AM, revealed seven beverage containers with various color beverages not labeled or dated. Further observation in the four-door reach in refrigerator on July…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-09 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, observations, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the resident has a right to personal privacy and confidentiality, including the right to privacy in his or her oral communications, for one of 20 Residents reviewed (Resident 13). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Quality of Life- Dignity last reviewed June 5, 2025, read, in part, Residents private space and property shall be respected at all times. Staff will knock and request permission before entering residents' rooms. Staff shall promote, maintain, and protect resident privacy. During an interview with Resident 13 on July 7, 2025, at 9:51 AM, in her room, Employee 1 (Nurse Aide) came to her doorway, entered the room without permission, and proceeded to attempt to make her bed. Resident 13 looked over at Employee 1 and stated Honey, I am trying to talk to [the surveyor]. Employee 1 then exited the room and closed the door behind him. Further into interview with Resident 13 on July 7, 2025, at 9:54 AM, in her room, her door was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations as well as resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, comfortable, and home-like interior on one of two nursing units (second floor). Findings include: Interview with Resident 67 on July 7, 2025, at 7:11 AM, it was revealed that he utilizes the shower and the bathroom in his room and feel it should be cleaner. Observation in Resident 67's bathroom on July 7, 2025, at 7:11 AM, revealed there was a black substance on the floor at the base of the three walls in the shower, the shower chair had a black substance on the mesh material that attached to the arms and seat base, and the towel hanging on the toilet seat had a faded light brown stain. The wall vent to the left of the toilet contained a dried brown substance and a dark grey fuzzy substance, and the pipes at the ceiling and ceiling vent contained a dark grey fuzzy substance. Observation and interview with Director of Nursing (DON) on July 8, 2025, at 1:40 PM, in Resident 67's bathroom revealed it was in the same condition as documented above. The DON…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-09 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a significant change assessment after a significant change in health status was identified in one of 20 residents reviewed (Resident 80). Findings include: Review of Resident 80's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included congestive heart failure (decreased ability of the heart to pump blood effectively throughout the body) and hypertension (elevated/high blood pressure). Review of Resident 80's completed Minimum Data Sets (MDS - standardized assessment tool utilized to identify a resident's physical, mental, and psychosocial health needs) revealed the most recently completed MDS was a Quarterly MDS with an assessment reference date of May 6, 2025. Review of the Quarterly MDS revealed Resident 80 was not coded as having either significant weight loss (Section K), nor a pressure injury (Section M). After May 6, 2025, Clinical record review revealed Resident 80 was diagnosed with a stage III pressure ulcer (injury of the skin that extends below the layers of the skin) on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-09 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of Centers for Medicare and Medicaid RAI manual, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for two of 20 resident records reviewed (Residents 19 and 86). Findings include: Review of Resident 19's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe), hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol), and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Review of Resident 19's clinical record revealed he had facility acquired pressure ulcers (wound that occurs when the skin and tissue are damaged by prolonged pressure), had a fall without injury on February 17, 2025, had a fall with an injury on February 27, 2025, and was receiving hospice services (end of life care). Further review of Resident 19's clinical record revealed he did not have any significant weight changes around the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure one of two medication storage areas observed were secure and access was limited to authorized personnel via a key (Second floor medication storage room). Findings include: During multiple observations on July 7, 2025, between 7:00 AM and 11:30 AM, it was observed that the door to the second story medication room was ajar. Further observation of the door revealed the door was prevented from fully closing due to the door catching on the door frame at the top. During the observations, staff were observed entering the second story medication room without the use of a key. On July 8, 2025,at approximately 10:05 AM, observation of the second story medication storage room revealed that the door was left ajar. At that time it was observed that no staff were present within line of sight of the medication room. At that time, the surveyor was able to access the medication storage room without a key. Observation of the medication room at that time revealed it stored multiple-dose containers of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-09 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility meal assessment form, completion of one meal test tray, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide food and a beverage that were at a palatable and appealing temperatures at one of one meal observed. Findings include: Review of facility document, titled Nutrition Service Test Meal, revealed hot entrée, starch and vegetable should have a temperature of 135 degrees Fahrenheit (F- unit of measure) or above at the time of service, and cold beverages should be 40 degrees F or below at the time of service. Interview with Resident 67 on July 7, 2025, at 7:03 AM, he revealed his dislike for the food served at the facility, including the temperature, and that at times the steam table is not always functional. Interview with Resident 24 on July 7, 2025, at 7:59 AM, the Resident revealed that the hot food is not served hot. Interview with Resident 13 on July 7, 2025, at 9:50 AM, revealed her food is served cold sometimes at her meals. A test tray was completed on July 8, 2025, at 12:48 PM, upon the completion of lunch…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to administer medications in a safe and sanitary manner for two of three residents observed during medication administration observation (Residents 7 and 24). Findings include: is there a policy? During medication administration observations conducted on July 8, 2025, at approximately 8:30 AM, Employee 5 was observed donning gloves. Employee 5 was then observed touching multiple services of the medication cart with gloved hands. Employee 5 was also observed retrieving a blood pressure cuff from the medication cart, entering the resident room and performing a blood pressure check on for Resident 7, which required touching Resident 7's skin. Employee 5 did not remove his soiled gloves after performing the blood pressure check on Resident 7. After exiting Resident 7's room, Employee 5 was observed preparing medications for Resident 7. During preparation of Resident 7's medication, Employee 5 was observed dispensing Vitamin D3 tablets from a multi-dose container into the lid of the multi-dose…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, comfortable, homelike interior, and failed to ensure that bath linens were in good condition on two of two nursing units observed (first and second floor). Findings include: Observations made on March 26, 2025, at the noted times revealed the following: - 10:38 AM - The metal ring around the pipe coming out of the top of Resident 1's toilet was rusted and disintegrating. The towel/safety bars near the toilet were noted to have corrosion. The top of the heater unit under the sink had multiple rusty areas. - 10:40 AM - The wall outside of Resident 1's room had multiple dried liquid stains. - 10:40 AM - a washcloth in the first floor linen closet was observed to have visible brownish stains, and the corner of another was tattered. The towels in the linen closet were grayish-white in color. - 10:49 AM - The frame of the raised toilet seat in Resident 2's room was soiled and rusty. The paint on the post next to the shower and on the ceiling near the post was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 32 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on policy review, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility displayed past non-compliance in its failure to provide care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice to ensure the resident's highest level of well-being for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 11). Findings include: Review of facility policy, Medication Administration, undated, revealed, Prior to administration, the medication and dosage schedule on the resident's medication administration record (MAR) is compared with the medication label .Residents are identified before medication is administered. Methods of identification include: a. Checking identification band, b. Checking photograph attached to medical record, c. If necessary, verifying resident identification with other facility personnel .Medications supplied for one resident are never administered to another resident. Review of Resident 11's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included Cauda Equina Syndrome (occurs when the bundle of the nerves at the lower end of the spinal cord are…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, document review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse by Employee 7 for one of six residents reviewed (Resident 4). Findings Include: A review of the facility's policy, titled Preventing Resident Abuse, revised November 28, 2016, defined abuse as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation or punishment that results in physical harm, pain or mental anguish. A review of Resident 4's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included schizoaffective disorder (a combination of symptoms of schizophrenia and mood disorder, such as depression or bipolar disorder. Symptoms may occur at the same time or at different times. Cycles of severe symptoms are often followed by periods of improvement. Symptoms may include delusions, hallucinations, depressed episodes, and manic periods of high energy) and a history of a traumatic brain injury (Brain dysfunction caused by an outside force,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-12 · tag F0741 — failed to have staff trained for behavioral health — isolatedEnsure that the facility has sufficient staff members who possess the competencies and skills to meet the behavioral health needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on document review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure sufficient staff who provide direct services to residents with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to provide nursing related services to assure resident safety and care for residents with mental and psychosocial disorders and a history of trauma to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for one of six residents reviewed (Resident 4). Findings Include: Review of the facility's Registered Nurse Job Description dated December 11, 2023 and signed by Employee 7 read, Purpose of Your Job Description- Supervise day to day nursing activities of the facility. Such supervision must be in accordance with federal, state and local standard guidelines, and regulations that govern the facility, and may be required by the Director of Nursing Services, to ensure the highest quality care is maintained at all times. Also, Interact/communicate with residents, staff and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a system for preventing, identifying, reporting, investigating, and controlling infections and communicable diseases, and failed to ensure staff follow professional standards of infection control practices during medication administration for two of five residents observed for medication administration (Residents 34 and 78). Findings include: Facility policy, titled Infection Control Prevention, Control and Antibiotic Stewardship, last reviewed July 25, 2024, read, in part, E. Measures for the Detection, Control and Prevention of HealthCare Acquired Infections. Detection of HealthCare Acquired Infections (HCAI) is accomplished through a facility based ongoing system of surveillance. All infections are identified and reported to the facility Infection Control Preventionist of designee . A Line Listing of residents with infections is maintained and tracked for trending and outbreak potential. Follow up review of lab data is compared. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-01 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — patternHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure one of one residents reviewed were provided the right to self-determination in regard to a room change (Resident 10). Findings include: Review of Resident 10's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included anxiety disorder (a mental health disorder characterized by feelings of worry, anxiety, or fear that are strong enough to interfere with one's daily activities) and major depressive disorder (a mental health disorder characterized by persistent low mood, decreased involvement in pleasurable activities, sleep and appetite pattern disruptions). During an interview with Resident 10 on July 29, 2024, at 2:02 PM, Resident 10 indicated that the Resident had requested a room change that had not been accommodated. Resident 10 indicated that the he had requested the room change because their roommate yells out frequently. Review of Resident 10's clinical record revealed a social services note dated April 5, 2024, at 11:37 AM, that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-01 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of resident council meeting minutes, policy review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to have evidence to support that resident council grievances were acted upon. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy, titled Activities/Recreation Administration, revealed that the Activities/Recreation department shall maintain monthly resident council minutes and communicates appropriate information to facility staff. Resident Council meeting minutes for April 2024, May 2024, June 2024, and July 2024 revealed that there were no concerns expressed during the meetings. During an interview on July 30, 2024, at 10:00 AM, with a group of five residents, revealed that the Residents have brought up multiple concerns at the Resident Council meeting and have been given no resolution regarding their concerns. The Residents stated that they go over the same concerns during every Resident Council meeting and do not review old business at the meetings. In the past four months, they have reported complaints about cold food, long waits for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-01 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide residents access to grievance forms in a manner that honors the right to file grievances anonymously for one of two resident areas observed (first floor), as well as five of five residents in attendance at the group interview (Residents 3, 17, 46, 71, and 87); and failed to make prompt efforts to resolve a grievance for one of six residents reviewed (Resident 85). Findings include: Review of the facility policy, titled Grievance Policy, with a review date of July 25, 2024, revealed that The facility will make information on how to file a grievance or complaint available to the resident by notifying the resident individually or with prominent postings throughout the facility to include: the right to file a grievance anonymously. Multiple observations from July 29, 2024, to August 1, 2024, in the facility failed to reveal that grievance forms were readily available to residents or resident representatives (first floor). Review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on policy review, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the resident's comprehensive plan of care accurately reflected the needs of the resident for three of 21 residents reviewed (Residents 20, 60, and 72). Findings include: Review of the facility policy, titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, with a review date of July 25, 2024, revealed Policy Statement. A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and for each resident . 8. The comprehensive, person-center care plan will: b. Describe services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being . 13. Assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the residents and the residents' conditions change. Review of Resident 20's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included type two diabetes mellitus (condition where the body…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-01 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, record review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to review and revise the resident plan of care and ensure the residents right to participate in the care planning process for seven of 27 residents reviewed (Resident 3, 34, 56, 58, 71, 73, and 81). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Care Planning - Interdisciplinary Team, last revised September 2013, read, in part, The resident, the resident's family and/or the resident's legal representative/guardian or surrogate are encouraged to participate in the development of and revisions to the resident's care plan. Every effort will be made to schedule care plan meetings at the best time of the day for the resident and family. Review of Resident 3's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included hypertension (high blood pressure) and dementia (loss of memory, language, problem-solving, and other thinking abilities that are severe enough to interfere with daily life). During an interview with Resident 3 on July 30, 2024, at approximately 10:30 AM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and resident representative and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure each resident received treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice for two of 21 residents reviewed (Residents 25 and 85). Findings Include: Facility policy, titled Pacemaker, Care of a Resident, with a last reviewed July 25, 2024, read, in part, Monitoring. 3. The pacemaker battery will be monitored remotely through the telephone or an internet connection. 4. The resident will have an EKG (electrocardiogram) annually, or as ordered, to monitor for changes in the heart's electrical activity. 5. Make sure the resident has a medical identification card that indicates he or she has a pacemaker. The medical record must contain this information as well. Documentation. 1. For each resident with a pacemaker, document the following in the medical record and on a pacemaker identification card upon admission: a. The name, address, and telephone number of the cardiologist; b.Type of pacemaker; c. Type of leads; d.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-01 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to act upon the licensed pharmacist's report of a medication irregularity for one of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident 29). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Medication Regimen Review, last reviewed July 25, 2024, read, in part The consultant pharmacist performs a comprehensive medication regimen review (MRR) at least monthly. Recommendations are acted upon and documented by the facility staff and or the prescriber. The director of nursing of designated licensed nurse address and document recommendations that do not require a physician intervention, e.g., monitor blood pressure. Review of Resident 29's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included hypotension (low blood pressure), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and atrial fibrillation (abnormal heart rhythm characterized by rapid and irregular beating). Review of Resident 29's physician orders revealed the following orders: Midodrine HCl Tablet 5 MG…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to store food and utilize equipment in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the main kitchen. Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Chapter 3 Food, not dated, read, in part, Packaged food shall be labeled as specified in law including food labeling, labeling marking devices, and containers. Food shall be protected from cross contamination. During preparation, unpackaged food shall be protected from environmental sources of contamination. A test kit or other device that accurately measures the concentration of sanitizing solutions shall be provided. Observation of the walk-in freezer on July 29, 2024, at 9:38 AM, revealed a bag of mixed vegetables not dated; one bag of corn not dated; one bag of peas not dated; two angel food cakes not dated; and one frozen beverage cup as well as one frozen shake from an outside source. During an interview with Employee 5 (Dietary Manager) on July 29, 2024, at 9:39 AM, he revealed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-01 · tag F0868 — patternHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the sign-in sheets for the facility's Quality Assurance (QA) Committee and staff interview, it was determined that the required members failed to attend a meeting at least quarterly for two of three quarters over the past year. Findings include: Review of all available documentation submitted by the facility revealed no evidence that the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and the facility Infection Control Preventionist attended a meeting during the quarter of October 2023, November 2023, and December 2023. Review of all available documentation submitted by the facility revealed no evidence that the facility Infection Control Preventionist attended a meeting during the quarter of April 2024, May 2024, and June 2024. During an interview with the NHA and the Director of Nursing (DON) on August 1, 2024, at approximately 9:28 AM, the NHA indicated that the facility QA committee meets monthly. He confirmed that the aforementioned members did not attend at least one meeting in the last quarter of 2023 or the second quarter of 2024. He further indicated that he would…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-01 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of the facility's infection prevention and control policy and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an antibiotic stewardship program that includes a system to effectively monitor antibiotic usage. Findings include: Facility policy, titled Infection Control Prevention, Control and Antibiotic Stewardship, last reviewed July 25, 2024, read, in part, A. Mission and Goals. The infection Prevention and Control Plan is a comprehensive process that addresses preventing, identifying, reporting, investigating, and controlling infections and communicable diseases and monitoring judicious use of antibiotic to individuals .the goals of the program are to: 3. Optimize the use of antibiotics to meet resident and community specific needs .6. Facilitate compliance with state and federal regulations relating to infection control and antibiotic stewardship. B. Scope 6. Core Elements of Antibiotic Stewardship Action: Formal review procedure for the appropriateness of any antibiotics prescribed by the Infection Preventionist on a regular basis when…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-01 · tag F0882 — patternDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of regulations, facility policy review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to have an Infection Preventionist (IP) that worked at least part time at the facility. Findings Include: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services regulation §483.80(b)(3) stated, The facility must designate one or more individual(s) as the infection Preventionist(s) (IP)(s) who are responsible for the facility ' s IPCP. The IP must: Work at least part-time at the facility. The IP must physically work onsite in the facility. He/she cannot be an off-site consultant or perform the IP work at a separate location such as a corporate office or affiliated short term acute care facility. Review of facility policy, titled Infection Control Prevention, Control and Antibiotic Stewardship, last reviewed July 25, 2024, revealed The facility designates one or more individual(s) as the infection Preventionist(s)(IPs) who are responsible for the facility IPCP. The IP works at least part-time at the facility. During an interview with the Director of Nursing, it was revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-01 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — patternEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of personnel training records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure each nurse aide was provided with the required in-service training consisting of no less than 12 hours per year for five of five nurse aide employee records reviewed (Employees 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10), and failed to provide annual training that included resident abuse prevention for one of five nurse aide employee records reviewed (Employee 6). Findings Include: Review of personnel information revealed Employee 6's hire date was November 18, 1992; Employee 7's hire date was October 16, 2000; Employee 8's hire date was November 15, 2004; Employee 9's hire date was October 15, 2007; and Employee 10's hire date was December 19, 2022. Review of facility training records failed to reveal that the aforementioned Employees completed 12 hours of required annual training in the past 12 months. Further review of facility training records failed to reveal evidence that abuse prevention training was completed by Employee 6 within the past 12 months. During an interview with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-01 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to include a resident in the development of their baseline care plan to establish the initial goals of the resident, and failed to provide the resident or their representative a written summary of their baseline care plan for two of two residents reviewed (Residents 6 and 30). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Care Plans- Baseline, with a revised date of December 2016, and a last review date of July 25, 2024, revealed 4. The facility must provide the resident and the representative, if applicable, with a written summary of the baseline care plan by completion of the of the comprehensive care plan. Review of facility policy, titled Care Planning - Interdisciplinary Team, last revised September 2013, read, in part, The resident, the resident's family and/or the resident's legal representative/guardian or surrogate are encouraged to participate in the development of and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-01 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy, observation, clinical record review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide services necessary to maintain adequate personal grooming of residents' dependent on staff for assistance with these activities of daily living for two of three residents reviewed (Residents 36 and 53). Findings Include: Review of facility policy, titled Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), Supporting, with a review date of July 25, 2024, revealed Appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADLs independently, with the consent of the resident and in accordance with the plan of care, including appropriate support and assistance with: hygiene (bathing, dressing, grooming, and oral care). Review of Resident 36's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included hypertension (high blood pressure) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-a common lung disease causing restricted airflow and breathing problems). During an interview with Resident 36 on July 29, 2024, at 10:15 AM, revealed that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-01 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolatedDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that garbage and refuse was disposed of properly, and sanitary conditions were maintained in the garbage storage area for one of one dumpster observed. Findings include: Observation of the receiving area dumpster on July 29, 2024, at 9:25 AM, revealed there were two bags of garbage on the ground in front of the dumpster; one was open and garbage was spilled out onto the ground, and there were five bags of garbage piled up on the ground to the left of the dumpster. Employee 5 (Dietary Manager) opened the sliding door to the garbage receptacle and it was empty. Interview with Employee 5 on July 29, 2024, at 9:29 AM, revealed the trash was left there by housekeeping staff and it should not be on the ground. Observation on July 30, 2024, at 8:39 AM, 11:40 AM, and 1:52 PM, revealed the sliding door to the dumpster was open while not in use. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on July 31, 2024, at 11:09 AM, revealed it is his expectation that the dumpster sliding door should be kept…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-01 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, facility document review, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide beverages for a resident in a form to meet the resident's individual need for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings Include: Review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included hypertension (elevated blood pressure) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a condition caused by damage to the airways or other parts of the lung that blocks airflow and makes it hard to breathe). Review of Resident 1's current physician orders revealed a diet order dated May 14, 2024, for a regular diet, mechanical soft texture, nectar consistency liquids. Review of Resident 1's current care plan revealed an intervention dated March 9, 2024, Ensure that all beverages offered comply with diet/fluid restrictions and consistency requirements; and an intervention, revised May 22, 2024, to provide diet as ordered: mechanical soft with nectar thick liquids. Review of facility grievance log revealed that on June 3, 2024,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, facility policy review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care and services regarding showering for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 2). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), Supporting, without a revision date, revealed, Appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADLs independently. Review of Resident 2's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included muscle weakness (weakness in the muscles causing decreasing ability to contract muscles) and malignant neoplasm of the frontal lobe (a cancerous brain tumor in the front of the brain in a portion that performs higher functions like reasoning and coordinated muscle movements). Review of Resident 2's current care plan dated May 28, 2024, revealed a focus area of, Resident at risk for functional decline in ADL's (activities of daily living), initiated of March 13, 2024. Review of Resident 2's clinical record failed to reveal any showers from April 13, 2024,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-01 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, completion of a test tray, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide beverages that were palatable temperatures for one of one meals tested. Findings include: An interview with Resident 1 on April 1, 2024, at 10:54 AM, revealed the meals could be better and items are often served cold. Review of facility grievance logs from January 2024 to present, revealed a grievance filed on March 26, 2024, related to a prison style food system and that his meals are typically 45 minutes late. Observation of second floor meal service on April 1, 2024, at 12:44 PM, revealed all residents had been served on the unit. A test tray was completed on April 1, 2024, at 12:44 PM, utilizing a lunch tray served from the tray line steam table on the unit. The test tray included: meatloaf, mashed potatoes, peas and carrots, ice cream, milk, and coffee. Temperatures taken by Employee 1 (Dietary Manager) revealed the milk was 55.2 degrees and coffee was 116.2 degrees. Consequently, items were not palatable. During an interview with Employee 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, and home-like environment for two of 24 residents reviewed (Residents 8 and 59). Findings include: Review of Resident 8's clinical record contained diagnoses included adult failure to thrive, dementia (a condition characterized by progressive loss of intellectual functioning, impairment of memory and abstract thinking), and muscle weakness. Observation on September 25, 2023, at 9:53 AM, in the hallway near the second floor nursing desk, revealed Resident 8 was in her tilt/recline wheelchair, and both blue plastic arm covers contained a light brown film. Observation with the Director Of Nursing (DON) on September 28, 2023, at 12:05 PM, in the dining room, revealed Resident 8 was in her tilt/recline wheelchair, and both blue plastic arm covers contained a light brown film. During an interview on September 28, 2023, at 12:05 PM with the DON, it was revealed that Resident 8's tilt/recline wheelchair arm covers should be cleaned. Review of Resident 59's clinical record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-28 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the resident assessment accurately reflected the resident status for two of 24 residents reviewed (Residents 52 and 62). Findings include: Review of Resident 52's clinical record on September 25, 2023, at approximately 11:00 AM, revealed diagnoses that included type II diabetes mellitus (decreased ability of the body to utilize insulin for the transport of glucose from the blood stream into the cells for nourishment) and hypertension (elevated/high blood pressure). Review of Resident 52's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - assessment tool utilized to identify a resident's physical, mental, and psychosocial needs), with an assessment reference date of July 27, 2023, revealed that section N.; 0410 was coded to reflect that Resident 52 had received an antibiotic medication for the prior seven days. Review of Resident 52's clinical record revealed that Resident 52 did not receive an antibiotic medication during the July 27, 2023, MDS assessment look back period. During an electronic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-28 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident observations, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the resident comprehensive plan of care was reviewed and revised for three of 24 residents reviewed (Residents 45, 62, and 292). Findings include: Review of Resident 45's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included history of stroke (damage to the brain from interruption of its blood supply), diabetes mellitus (the body's ability to produce or respond to the hormone insulin is impaired, resulting in abnormal metabolism of carbohydrates and elevated levels of glucose in the blood and urine), dementia (a condition characterized by progressive loss of intellectual functioning, impairment of memory and abstract thinking), and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Observation in Resident 45's room on September 25, 2023, at 11:20 AM, revealed a bottle of Glucerna (diabetic meal replacement formula) was being administered via a feeding pump. Review of Resident 45's September 2023 physician orders included Glucerna 1.5 at 65 milliliters per hour (ml/hr - unit…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-28 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documentation, observation, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide an ongoing program of activities designed to meet the needs, interests, and functional abilities of residents for two of two nursing floors (First and Second floor nursing units). Findings include: During resident interviews on September 25, 2023, at approximately 10:30 AM, Resident 17 reported that the facility cancels activities frequently. Further, during the resident interviews, Resident 52 also stated that the facility has canceled multiple activities. An interview with the residents who participated in the Resident Council group meeting on September 26, 2023, at 1:15 PM, revealed that 14 out of 14 residents in group revealed activities do not occur daily or as scheduled by the facility. Review of the facility's September 2023 Activity Calendar revealed that trivia is scheduled on the first floor on September 27, 2023, at 2:00 PM. Observation on the first floor on September 27, 2023, at 2:17 PM, revealed no activities occurring on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-28 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to complete a comprehensive assessment after a significant change in condition for one of 24 residents reviewed (Resident 81). Findings include: Review of resident 81's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included dysphasia (swallowing difficulties) and Alzheimer's disease (a progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions). Review of Resident 81's current physician orders revealed an order for Homeland Hospice, due to unspecified protein calorie malnutrition, with an order date of August 23, 2023. Review of Resident 81's comprehensive care plan revealed, under the focus area, that Resident was admitted to Hospice services on August 16, 2023, due to unspecified severe protein-calorie malnutrition, with an initiation date of August 16, 2023. Review of Resident 81's MDS assessments (Minimum Data Set - an assessment tool to review all care areas specific to the resident such as a resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial needs), revealed that a significant…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-28 · tag F0661 — isolatedEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, facility policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a medication reconciliation of medications, record of disposition of medications, and documentation of medications dispensed was conducted upon discharge for one of three discharged residents reviewed (Resident 88). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Discharge With Medication, effective date of July 1, 2023, revealed it stated it was the facility's policy that, Medications are sent with the resident upon discharge from the facility only under conditions that protect the resident and assure compliance with applicable state laws. Review of section, titled Procedures, revealed in subsections A, F, H, and I stated, Medications may be sent with the resident on discharge if ordered by the prescriber. The prescriber should list the medications to be released upon discharge .Discharge medication information is listed in the order summary report in [the electronic health record] .The resident or responsible party should sign the Medication Release…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, policy review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain adequate personal hygiene and grooming of residents dependent on staff for assistance with these activities of daily living for one of 24 residents reviewed (Resident 47). Findings include: Review of Facility provided policy, titled Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), Supporting, revised March 2018, revealed, Residents will be provided with care, treatment, and services as appropriate to maintain or improve their ability to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs). Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene. Review of Resident 47's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included hypertension (high blood pressure) and major depressive disorder (a mental health disorder characterized by persistently depressed mood or loss of interest in activities, causing significant impairment in daily life). Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-28 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, policy review, staff interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident with a pressure ulcer received care consistent with professional standards of practice for one of 24 Residents reviewed (Resident 50). Findings include: A review of the facility wound care policy, titled Dry/Clean Dressings, last reviewed August 2023, stated, after cleaning the wound and applying treatment, apply the ordered dressing and secure; label with date and initials on top of dressing. A review of the clinical record for Resident 50 on September 28, 2023, revealed clinical diagnoses that included quadriplegia (paralysis of all four extremities, including the trunk) and stage IV sacral pressure ulcer (ulcer involving loss of skin layers, exposing muscle and bone of the large, triangular bone at the base of the spine and at the upper and back part of the pelvic cavity). A review of Resident 50's physician orders dated September 2023, included an order for wound care to the sacrum every day and evening shift. Observation of wound care on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-28 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, facility policy review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the physician documented a rationale for declination of a pharmacy review recommendation for two of 24 residents reviewed (Resident 28 and Resident 81). Findings include: Review of the facility policy, titled Medication Regimen Review (MRR), last reviewed dated 2006, revealed, Recommendations are acted upon and documented by the facility staff and or the prescriber. Physician accepts and acts upon suggestion or rejects and provides an explanation for disagreeing. Review of Resident 28's clinical record contained diagnoses that included dementia (a condition characterized by progressive loss of intellectual functioning, impairment of memory and abstract thinking) with behavioral disturbance, psychosis (a severe mental condition in which thought and emotions are so affected that contact is lost with external reality), anxiety (a feeling of worry, nervousness, or unease), and depression (feelings of severe despondency and dejection). Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, facility policy review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure controlled substances were contained in a permanently affixed compartment for one of one medication rooms reviewed (second floor medication room). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Controlled Medicine Storage, (no date) revealed it was the facility's policy for, Medications included in the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) classification as controlled substances are subject to special handling, storage, disposal and recordkeeping in the facility in accordance with federal, state and other applicable laws and regulations. Review of the policy's Procedure section revealed subsections A and B stated, The director of nursing and the consultant pharmacist maintain the facility's compliance with federal and state laws and regulations in the handling of controlled medications .Scheduled controlled medications and other medications subject to abuse are stored in a locked permanently affixed compartment separate from all other medications . During…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$10,059 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $10,059 — penalty dated 2023-09-28
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to PRIORITY HEALTHCARE GROUP — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 3.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 3.0 | +2.0 vs chain |
The other 11 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.0★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HASHTAG HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 02/01/2017 |
| BLGLPA LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 14% | since 10/27/2017 |
| FAIR OAKS FAMILY HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 14% | since 01/28/2020 |
| HASHTAG-EL-HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 17% | since 10/27/2017 |
| SAMARA HOLDINGS COMPANY LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 17% | since 01/28/2020 |
| STRAWBERRY HILL HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 17% | since 01/28/2020 |
| SEBBAG, GABRIEL | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 5% | since 10/27/2017 |
| SCHIOWITZ, MARC | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2019 |
| CLINICAL CONSULTING SERVICES LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2019 |
| PRIORITY CARE GROUP LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 01/01/2019 |
| SUMMATION FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2019 |
| LATEEF, SALMAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2019 |
| ROSEN, JACOB | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/18/2026 |
| GAMZEH, DAVID | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/02/2025 |
| GLATZER, AKIVA | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/02/2025 |
| GREATOREX, TINA | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/02/2025 |
| GPH CAMP HILL III LP, | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/01/2017 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 90% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in PA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395123. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-09, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.