Nursing And Rehabilitation At The Mansion

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 61 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 52.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 42 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 31% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 70 beds and averages 65.8 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.27 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.70 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.75 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.95 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.39 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.79 to 0.47 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 21% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2024-01-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of facility documents, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement interventions and provide adequate supervision to prevent a fall for one of three residents reviewed for falls that resulted in harm (Resident 5). This deficiency is cited as past non-compliance. Findings include: Clinical record review revealed the facility admitted Resident 5 on March 26, 2015. Review of Resident 5's plan of care initiated on March 26, 2015, indicated that Resident 5 is at risk for falls related to her diagnosis of Alzheimer's dementia, history of falls, syncope, and noncompliance with assistance with transfers. Nursing documentation dated October 5, 2023, at 2:45 PM revealed the Director of Nursing was called to the front porch by staff asking for nursing assistance. Documentation revealed that upon reaching the porch the Director of Nursing was notified that Resident 5 had wheeled herself off the porch and down the steps. Resident 5 was noted to be lying…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to prepare and store food items in a safe and sanitary manner in the facility's main kitchen.Findings included: Observation of the facility's main kitchen on December 16, 2025, at 8:00 AM revealed the following: There was an accumulation of dust on the stainless-steel hood over the stove. The dry goods storage area contained a white colored heating/cooling unit on the wall near the ceiling. The unit had a build-up of a blackish colored substance on the vents of the unit. The above information was reviewed with the Nursing Home Administrator and Director of Nursing on December 17, 2025, at 2:00 PM. A review of the facility policy titled Temperature, last reviewed on May 7, 2025, revealed that the temperatures of the food items will be taken and properly recorded for each meal. Observation of the plating service during the tray line in the facility's main kitchen on December 19, 2025, at 11:50 AM revealed that staff were plating the lunchtime meal food trays and placing them in delivery carts so they…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-12-19 · tag F0848 — pattern
  Provide a neutral and fair arbitration process and agree to arbitrator and venue.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on a review of the facility's arbitration agreements and staff interview, it was determined that the facility's arbitration agreements failed to ensure a neutral and fair arbitration process by ensuring the selection of a neutral arbitrator for two of three residents reviewed with a signed arbitration agreement (Residents 13 and 50).Findings include: Review of an Addendum XIII: Arbitration Agreement (an agreement that the resident/resident's responsible party and the facility will resolve legal disputes through binding arbitration, waiving their right to a trial), signed by Resident 13's responsible party on March 20, 2025, revealed that the document stipulated that, By signing this Arbitration Agreement, the parties hereby agree that if the parties cannot agree on a neutral arbitrator after thirty days, then (name of arbitrator services company, which the facility utilized), will serve as neutral arbitrator in accordance with the (name of arbitrator services company, which the facility utilized) Rules of Procedure. The agreement afforded the facility the selection of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that active physician orders incorporated resident wishes related to end-of-life care for one of four residents reviewed for advance directives concerns (Resident 11).Findings include: Review of Resident 11's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed social services documentation dated October 1, 2025, at 1:37 PM that the interdisciplinary team met with Resident 11's two sons and reviewed her POLST (Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment, a binding medical order that instructs healthcare providers the specific types of medical treatment a resident wishes to receive at the end of life) form that instructed staff to not use artificial hydration and nutrition by tube. Review of Resident 11's physical chart revealed a POLST document signed by Resident 11's son/responsible party on November 12, 2025, that Resident 11 was not to receive hydration or nutrition by tube. Review of Resident 11's active physician orders dated August 12, 2025, revealed instructions to trial nutrition…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident's rights to secure and confidential personal and medical information in the facility (Main Lobby Area) for one of 16 residents reviewed (Resident 74). Findings include: Observation of the main lobby of the facility on December 18, 2025, at 11:01 AM revealed a binder titled Department of Health Survey Results. The binder contained the results of recent surveys of the facility conducted by Federal or State surveyors and any plan of correction in effect with respect to the facility. Review of the contents of the binder revealed that the facility placed the full health survey letters and complaint deficiency letters (letters sent to administration after a survey) into the binder. Further review of the binder revealed a complaint deficiency letter and associated Statement of Deficiencies (Form CMS-2567) for a complaint investigation completed on December 27, 2024. The letter noted the name and associated specific resident identifier for Resident 74. The facility failed to ensure…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-19 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interview, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately reflected residents' status for two of 16 residents reviewed (Residents 37 and 2).Findings include: Interview with Resident 37 on December 17, 2025, at 10:45 AM revealed that he experienced range of motion (ROM) limitations of his bilateral arms and shoulders due to arthritis (swelling and tenderness of one or more joints, main symptoms are joint pain and stiffness), and he was not participating in any exercise programs or therapy related to range of motion exercises. Observation of Resident 37 on the date and time of the interview revealed that his range of motion limited him to raise his arms only to midway between his waist and head. Clinical record review for Resident 37 revealed diagnoses that included primary osteoarthritis (the protective cartilage that cushions the ends of the bones wears down over time) of left and right shoulders since April 1,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to invite residents to their care plan meetings for one of 16 residents reviewed (Resident 9) and failed to revise a resident's comprehensive care plan for one of 16 residents reviewed (Resident 20).Findings include: The SOM Appendix PP states that Residents and their representative(s) must be afforded the opportunity to participate in their care planning process. During an interview with Resident 9 on [DATE], at 9:52 AM he stated that he had never been invited to his care plan meetings. Resident 9 has a BIMS score (Brief Interview for Mental Status, used to evaluate aspects of cognition such as attention, orientation, and memory recall) of 15 out of 15, indicating normal thinking and memory, no cognitive issues. Clinical record review of Resident 9's chart revealed no documentation of the resident being invited to his care plan meetings. The Nursing Home Administrator and the Director of Nursing were…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review, observation, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide services consistent with professional standards of practice and the resident's comprehensive care plan related to dialysis access care for one of one resident reviewed for dialysis concerns (Resident 6).Findings include: Interview with Resident 6 on December 16, 2025, at 10:45 AM revealed that she leaves the facility three times a week for hemodialysis treatment (due to the inability of the kidneys to filter blood, blood is circulated from the resident, through a machine, for the purpose of removing excess fluids and waste products). Observation of Resident 6 during the interview revealed intravenous access tubing from a dressing on her right upper chest. Resident 6 stated that she needed to have the fistula (shunt, a connection surgically created between an artery and a vein that is used for hemodialysis treatment) in her left arm revised due to a failure to function; and the dialysis center was temporarily using the site to her right upper chest for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of facility documentation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a complete and accurate accounting of a controlled medication for one of three closed resident records reviewed (Resident 71). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 71 revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and discharged due to expiring on October 29, 2025. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for Resident 71 revealed the resident had orders for morphine sulfate (a controlled substance; a narcotic medication used to relieve pain), which included the following: Morphine sulfate (concentrate) oral solution 20 milligrams (mg) per milliliter (ml) give 0.25 ml by mouth four times a day for generalized pain for five days dated October 21, 2025, at 6:00 PM. Morphine sulfate (concentrate) oral solution 20 mg/ml give 0.25 ml by mouth every two hours as needed for pain / shortness of breath dated October 21, 2025, at 5:15…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on a review of select facility policies and procedures, clinical record review, observation, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure an environment free from the potential spread of infection related to enhanced barrier precautions for one of 16 residents reviewed (Resident 6).Findings include: The facility policy entitled, Enhanced Barrier Precautions, last reviewed May 7, 2025, revealed that enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) are utilized to prevent the spread of multi-drug-resistant organisms (MDROs) to residents. EBP refers to infection prevention and control interventions designed to reduce the transmission of multi-drug-resistant organisms during high contact resident care activities. EBP apply when a resident has a wound or indwelling medical device. Indwelling medical devices include central lines. EBPs employ targeted gown and glove use (PPE, personal protective equipment) in addition to standard precautions during high contact resident care activities when contact precautions do not otherwise apply. Signs are posted on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-27 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of select facility policies and procedures, closed clinical record, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to notify a medical provider of a change in a resident's condition for one out of four residents reviewed (Resident CR1). Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled, Change in a Resident's Condition or Status, revealed a policy statement that noted the facility should promptly notify the resident, his or her attending physician, and representative of changes in the resident's medical/mental condition and/or status. The policy further noted the nurse will notify the resident's attending physician or physician on call when there is a significant change in the resident's physical condition, need to alter the resident's medical treatment significantly, and/or specific instructions to notify the physician of changes in the resident's condition. A review of the facility policy titled, Oxygen Therapy, revealed that a physician must order the oxygen therapy.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$10,033 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $10,033 — penalty dated 2024-01-19

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PRIORITY HEALTHCARE GROUP — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 85% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA