Gardens At Orangeville, The
200 Berwick Road, Orangeville, PA 17859 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 119 certified beds · (570) 683-5036 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Feb 2024
- a high number of inspection citations overall (43) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 17.3% | 16.8% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 7.5% | 6.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.7% | 0.7% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 4.7% | 1.5% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 8.7% | 10.8% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.1% | 3.1% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 26.8% | 17.0% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 27.6% | 20.0% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 94.7% | 93.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 10.6% | 4.8% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 26.3% | 25.5% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 11.4% | 17.7% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.4% | 1.4% | 1.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 81.8% | 68.7% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 17.9% | 22.5% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 10.4% | 9.5% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 3.41 | 1.62 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.95 | 1.18 | 1.80 | typical |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
51.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 32 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 46.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 28 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 55% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 51.1%CMS range 36.6–70.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.3%CMS range 6.4–16.4 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 46.4% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 42.9% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 50.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 97.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.8% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.4%CMS range 3.3–14.7 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.85 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 119 beds and averages 104.9 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.06 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.51 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.78 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.79 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.16 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.58 to 0.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
43 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 33 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-16 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of select facility policy, Resident Council meeting minutes, grievance logs, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to thoroughly investigate a grievance, ensure prompt, ongoing efforts to resolve a grievance, provide timely status updates regarding the grievance resolution progress, and closed the grievance as resolved without providing a written decision or follow-up to the residents while the residents continued to experience severe delays in care for three of seven residents reviewed (Residents 2, 3, and 4).Findings include: A review of the facility's policy titled Grievance Policy last reviewed by the facility on May 1, 2026, indicated that residents have the right to prompt efforts to resolve grievances. The reasonable timeframe the resident can expect a completed review of the grievance is within 5 to 7 business days. The Grievance Official will be responsible to oversee the grievance process, receive and track grievances through their conclusion, lead any investigations by the facility, issue written grievance decisions to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide services to maintain a clean and homelike environment for two out of two nursing units (Units East and West). Findings include:An observation on May 13, 2026, at 10:04 AM in resident room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed grey circular discolorations, dirt accumulation, and floor stains in front of the room entrance and bathroom. An observation on May 13, 2026, at 10:06 AM in resident room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed small grey circular discolorations and floor stains in front of the room's entrance, the bathroom's entrance, and around the bathroom commode. An observation on May 13, 2026, at 10:10 AM in resident room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed a garbage can with a folded plastic liner on the bottom of the can, which was not properly inserted into the garbage to properly contain refuse. Inside the garbage can was an empty soda bottle, a cup, and several devices utilized to clean intravenous (IV) sites. An observation on May 13, 2026, at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, observations, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide services to maintain a clean and homelike environment for two out of two nursing units (West and East Units), including experiences reported by one out of twenty-two residents sampled (Resident 43).Findings include: A clinical record review revealed Resident 43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included chronic kidney disease (gradual loss of kidney function) and paraplegia (a condition characterized by the loss or impairment of motor and sensory functions in the lower half of the body). A review of an admission Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS-a federally mandated standardized assessment process conducted periodically to plan resident care) dated July 14, 2025, revealed that Resident 43 was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 13 (Brief Interview for Mental Status-a tool within the Cognitive Section of the MDS that is used to assess the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-09-19 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of scheduled activities and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide an ongoing program of activities to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of residents including experiences expressed by four out of five residents during a resident group interview (Residents 7, 8, 26, and 37).Findings include: During a resident group interview on September 17, 2025, at 10:00 AM, four out of five residents raised concerns that there were not enough evening activities available to meet their interests. Resident 8 explained that in the past, there were activities after dinner like a recreation card club that he participated in and enjoyed. He indicated there are no activities in the evening now and he would like to see them return. During the resident group interview Residents 7 and 26 explained they would like to have arts and craft activities offered in the evening after dinner. They indicated that currently there is not much to do in the evening and would like to have evening activities a few…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to maintain acceptable practices for the storage and service of food to prevent the potential for contamination and microbial growth in food, which increased the risk of food-borne illness in the food and nutrition services department and one of two resident pantry areas (West Nursing Unit). Findings include:Food safety and inspection standards for safe food handling indicate that everything that comes in contact with food must be kept clean and food that is mishandled can lead to foodborne illness. Safe steps in food handling, cooking, and storage are essential in preventing foodborne illness. You cannot always see, smell, or taste harmful bacteria that may cause illness according to the USDA (The United States Department of Agriculture, also known as the Agriculture Department, is the U.S. federal executive department responsible for developing and executing federal laws related to food).Observation on September 16, 2025, at 9:20 AM during the initial tour of the food and nutrition services department…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-19 · tag F0571 — isolatedLimit the charges against residents' personal funds for items or services for which payment is made under Medicare or Medicaid.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, resident fund account information, facility admission documents, and staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to protect the resident's personal funds by imposing charges against a resident's personal needs allowance (PNA) for a service for which payment is made under Medicaid for one of 22 sampled residents (Resident 7). Findings include: A review of the facility admission document titled Admissions Notice Packet revealed residents will pay the established Medicaid rate. The residents will be required to make payments towards the cost of care. The payment towards the cost of care is determined after allowing certain deductions. One such deduction is the monthly personal needs allowance (PNA the amount of a Medicaid recipient's monthly income they can keep for personal expenses in a nursing home or other long-term care facility. This money is not used to pay for their care and can be spent on items and services not covered by Medicaid, such as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, a review of clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a person-centered care plan to address a resident's limited range of motion to the left upper extremity and non-compliance with a therapeutic device to maintain skin integrity and prevent worsening range of motion for one resident out of 22 sampled (Resident 44). Findings include:A clinical record review revealed that Resident 44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included cerebrovascular accident (stroke) and depression. A review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS -a federally mandated standardized assessment process conducted periodically to plan resident care) dated July 15, 2025, indicated the resident had a BIMS (brief interview mental screening tool used to screen and identify cognitive impairment) score of 12 (8 to 12 indicates moderate cognitive impairment) and impairment of the upper extremity (shoulder, elbow, wrist, hand) on one side. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide nursing services consistent with professional standards of practice by failing to obtain physician orders and develop and implement a person-centered comprehensive care plan in accordance with standards of practice for one resident out of 22 sampled residents (Resident 15). Findings include: According to the American Nurses Association Principles for Nursing Documentation, nurses document their work and outcomes and provide an integrated, real-time method of informing the health care team about the patient status. Timely documentation of the following types of information should be made and maintained in a patient's EHR (electronic health record) to support the ability of the health care team to ensure informed decisions and high-quality care in the continuity of patient care: AssessmentsClinical problemsCommunications with other health care professionals regarding the patientCommunication with and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-19 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, select policy review, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure enteral feeding syringes in use were labeled and dated, and failed to provide direction on the maximum time such syringes may remain in service, to prevent contamination and other complications, for one resident receiving enteral nutrition out of 22 residents sampled (Resident 40).Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Checking Gastric Residual Volume (GVR) Policy last reviewed by the facility January 24, 2025, indicated that nurses should assess tolerance of enteral feeding (any method of feeding that uses the gastrointestinal (GI) tract to deliver nutrition and calories) and minimize the potential for aspiration (when material such as gastric contents, saliva, food, or nasopharyngeal secretions are inhaled into the airway or respiratory tract). The policy did not address the labeling, dating, rinsing, or disposal timeframes of syringes used for enteral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of select facility policy, observation, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to maintain respiratory equipment in a manner to promote optimal functioning for one resident out of 22 sampled residents. (Resident 9). Findings include:A review of facility policy entitled Equipment Management Policy last reviewed on January 24, 2025, revealed the nebulizer machine tubing and masks are to be changed weekly and as needed to ensure sanitary conditions and safe function. A nebulizer machine is a device that converts liquid medication into a fine mist for inhalation to treat respiratory conditions. A review of Resident 9's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including hemiplegia (paralysis affecting one side of the body), hemiparesis (weakness affecting one side of the body), and aphasia (a communication disorder resulting from damage to the language areas of the brain). An observation conducted on September 17, 2025, at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 33 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-04 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide services to maintain a clean and homelike environment for one out of two nursing units (West Unit), including issues reported by two of seven sampled residents (Residents 5 and 6) and one resident representative (Resident 2's representative). Findings include: An observation conducted on June 4, 2025, at 10:45 AM in Resident 2's bathroom revealed a strong, musty urine odor. During an interview at that time, Resident 2's representative expressed concerns regarding the persistent smell of urine in the resident's bathroom. She reported that although the odor subsides temporarily following cleaning, it returns shortly thereafter. The representative stated that the recurring odor is unacceptable and affects the living experience of her family member. A follow-up observation at 1:20 PM that same day confirmed that the strong, musty urine odor remained present in Resident 2's bathroom. During a facility tour on June 4, 2025, live and dead insects were observed throughout the [NAME]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide nursing services consistent with professional standards of quality to ensure that licensed nurses properly evaluated and provided nursing care according to physician orders for one resident (Resident A1) out of 8 residents reviewed. According to the Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, State Board of Nursing, 21.11 (a)(1)(2)(4) indicates that the registered nurse was to collect complete ongoing data to determine nursing care needs, analyze the health status of individuals and compare the data with the norm when determining nursing care needs, and carry out nursing care actions that promote, maintain, and restore the well-being of individuals. The Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, State Board of Nursing, 21.145 Functions of the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) (a) The LPN is prepared to function as a member of the health-care team by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-06 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, a review of personnel files and employee credentials, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the full-time director of food and nutrition services, who was not a qualified dietitian or other clinically qualified nutrition professional, received frequently scheduled consultations from a qualified dietitian or other clinically qualified nutritional professional. Findings include: According to current federal regulatory guidance the facility must employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, taking into consideration resident assessments, individual plans of care and the number, acuity, and diagnoses of the facility's resident population in accordance with the facility assessment. In the absence of a full-time qualified dietitian the director of food and nutrition services the facility must designate a person to serve as the director of food and nutrition services. (i) The director of food and nutrition services must at a minimum meet one of the following…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide care in a manner that promotes each resident's quality of life by failing to respond timely to residents' requests for assistance, including experiences reported by one resident out of the 19 residents sampled (Resident 42) and experiences reported by four out of the five residents during a resident group interview (Residents 4, 15, 36, and 52). Findings include: A clinical record review revealed Resident 42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that include chronic kidney disease (gradual loss of kidney function) and fibromyalgia (a chronic disorder that causes pain and tenderness throughout the body, as well as fatigue and trouble sleeping). A review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS-a federally mandated standardized assessment process conducted periodically to plan resident care) dated November 20, 2024, revealed that Resident 42 is cognitively intact with a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide services to maintain a clean and homelike environment for two out of three nursing units (100 and 200 Halls). Findings include: An observation on December 3, 2024, at 10:42 AM revealed room [ROOM NUMBER]'s bathroom with brown stains on the floor to the left of the toilet. The inner bathroom doorframe was also observed with similar brown stains. An observation on December 3, 2024, at 1:09 PM revealed room [ROOM NUMBER] contained a window air conditioning unit with a large build-up of dust and fuzz on the intake vent. Several black, round-shaped substances build-ups were observed on the airflow fins. An observation on December 3, 2024, at 1:38 PM revealed room [ROOM NUMBER] the bed located by the window had a white sheet with tan stains. Garbage and paper debris were observed on the floor on both sides of the bed. An observation on December 4, 2024, at 9:30 AM revealed the floor trim board had multiple stained…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-06 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set Assessments (MDS - a federally mandated standardized assessment conducted at specific intervals to plan resident care) accurately reflected the status of two residents out of 19 sampled (Residents 53 and 70). Findings included: A review of Resident 53's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included Alzheimer's disease. A current physician order initially dated December 3, 2021, noted an order for Apixaban (an anticoagulant medication also known as a blood thinner) 5 mg by mouth twice daily for history of thrombosis (formation of a blood clot inside a blood vessel) and embolism (traveling blood clot). Review of Resident 53's October 2024 and November 2024 Medication Administration Records revealed Apixaban 5 mg was administered twice daily as ordered by the physician. A review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, select facility investigative reports, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to implement effective safety measures to prevent an injury during transfer for one out of the 19 sampled residents (Resident 43). Findings include: A clinical record review revealed Resident 43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that include dementia (a condition characterized by the loss of cognitive functioning such as thinking, remembering, and reasoning, to such an extent that it interferes with a person's daily life and activities) and osteoporosis (a bone disease that develops when bone mineral density and bone mass decrease, or when the structure and strength of bone change). A review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS-a federally mandated standardized assessment process conducted periodically to plan resident care) dated August 20, 2024, revealed that Resident 43 is severely cognitively impaired with a BIMS score of 03 (Brief Interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-06 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, select facility policy, and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure that physician ordered intravenous (giving medication or fluid through a needle or tube inserted into a vein) antibiotics were administered as prescribed for two residents out of two sampled (Residents CR1 and 122). Findings include: Review of a facility policy titled Administering Medications last reviewed by the facility on February 1, 2024, indicated that medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. Only persons licensed or permitted by the state to prepare, administer, and document the administration of medications may do so. Medications must be administered in accordance with the orders, including any required time frame. Medications must be administered within one hour of their prescribed time unless otherwise specified. The individual administering the medication must document such in the eMAR (electronic medication administration) system after…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-06 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined the attending physician failed to act upon pharmacist identified irregularities in the medication regimen of one of 19 residents sampled (Resident 22). Findings include: A review of Resident 22's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included bipolar disorder (a serious mental illness that causes unusual shifts in mood, ranging from extreme highs to extreme lows and schizoaffective disorder (a mental health condition that is marked by symptoms such as hallucinations and delusions and mood disorder symptoms such as depression). A review of an October 2024 Note to Attending Physician/Prescriber revealed the consultant pharmacist indicated the resident's order for Depakote ER 250mg (medication used to stabilize mood) was to be reviewed for a gradual dose reduction. Further review revealed the resident's attending physician failed to write an appropriate response to the pharmacy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide nursing services consistent with professional standards of quality to ensure that licensed nurses properly evaluated and provided nursing care for one resident (Resident 1) out of 5 residents reviewed. According to the Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, State Board of Nursing, 21.11 (a)(1)(2)(4) indicates that the registered nurse was to collect complete ongoing data to determine nursing care needs, analyze the health status of individuals and compare the data with the norm when determining nursing care needs, and carry out nursing care actions that promote, maintain, and restore the well-being of individuals. The Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, State Board of Nursing, 21.145 Functions of the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) (a) The LPN is prepared to function as a member of the health-care team by exercising sound judgement based on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to monitor one resident's whereabouts and activities to prevent access to potential accident hazards for one of eight sampled residents. (Resident A1) Findings include: A review of clinical record revealed that Resident A1 was admitted [DATE], with diagnoses that included fracture of the femur. Review of the resident's current care plan revealed that Resident A1 was at risk to elope and an intervention was for staff to apply a wander guard (a bracelet like device that is placed on an extremity that assisted with the location of a resident who may wander). Review of resident A1's nursing progress notes since admission April 3, 2024, revealed the resident had displayed consistent behaviors of exit seeking, was repeatedly attempting to self-transfer and was to have increased visual supervision. During an interview with Employee 1 (nurse aide) during the survey of May 30, 2024, she stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-16 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, a review of facility's planned menus and concerns/grievances lodged with the facility and resident and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to plan menus that accommodate residents' food preferences, to the extent possible, to increase resident satisfaction with meals for residents which included four residents of 15 residents reviewed (Resident B2, B3, B4, and B5). Findings included: A review of the facility's grievance log dated March 26, 2024, revealed that Resident B2 lodged a concern regarding the lack of variety on the facility's planned menu. Resident B5 lodged a concern with that there are too many eggs served at breakfast. An interview with the dietary manager on April 16, 2024, at 10:15 a.m., revealed that the facility's cycle menus were developed and adjusted by the facility's corporate dietitian. The dietary manager revealed that residents in the facility expressed their feelings that that their preferences aren't always being considered in the development of the menus for their facility. During an interview with Residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-16 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to afford a resident the right to participate in the resident's treatment and health care decision making, including the right to refuse specific treatment, for one resident out of 15 reviewed. (Resident B1) Findings included: According to long term care regulatory requirements a resident has the right to select or refuse specific treatments options before the care plan is instituted, based on the information provided as required under §483.10(c)(1), (4)-(5), F552. A review of Resident B1's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included type two diabetes [is a condition that results from insufficient production of insulin, causing high blood sugar], cirrhosis of the liver [is a degenerative disease of the liver resulting in scarring and liver failure], and major depressive disorder. A review of Resident B1' s Annual MDS (Minimum Data Set - a federally…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of grievances lodged with the facility, observations and staff and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide housekeeping services to maintain a clean and orderly environment for residents, including Residents B2 and B3. Findings include: A review of a grievance that roommates, Residents B2 and B3, lodged with the facility dated March 26, 2024, revealed that the residents expressed their concerns that their room is not thoroughly cleaned, especially on the weekends. During interviews with the two cognitively intact residents, Resident B2 and Resident B3, on April 16, 2024, at 10:40 a.m., the residents stated that their bathroom is not always cleaned and that the windows and window treatments in their room are very dirty. Observations conducted on April 16, 2024, at 10:55 a.m., revealed that the bathroom, inside of resident room [ROOM NUMBER], there was a strong smell of urine, a soiled rag laying on the floor in front of the toilet, and the floor felt sticky. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-16 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and the Resident Assessment Instrument and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the Minimum Data Set Assessments (MDS - a federally mandated standardized assessment conducted at specific intervals to plan resident care) accurately reflected the status of one resident out of 13 sampled (Resident 62). Findings included: A review of Resident 62's clinical record revealed she was admitted [DATE], with diagnosis to include vertigo, osteoarthritis, gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD), and diabetes. A review of the residents' plan of care, date initiated February 12, 2024, indicated that's her wishes were to return home after completion of her therapeutic stay. A Social Service note dated February 12, 2024, at 10:11 PM revealed that Resident 62's goal was to be rehabilitated and return to the community, back to her daughter's home. A review of an Activities progress note dated February 15, 2024, at 11:28 AM, indicated that the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an environment free of potential accident hazards and obstacles to safe mobility, assistance devices, on one of three nursing units (200 hall). Findings include: An observation of the 200-nursing unit, on April 16, 2024, at approximately 10:35 AM revealed that one side of the hallway from resident room [ROOM NUMBER] to 207, was lined with mechanical lifts, linen carts, soiled linen and trash hampers, and wheelchairs. These items obstructed access to the corridor handrails on that side of the hallway, which are to be used for resident ambulation or mobility assistance. A second observation of the 200-nursing unit, on April 16, 2024, at approximately 10:50 AM revealed that one side of the hallway from resident room [ROOM NUMBER] to 207, was lined with mechanical lifts, linen carts, soiled linen and trash hampers, and wheelchairs. These items obstructed access to the corridor handrails on that side of the hallway, which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-02 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and a review of employee qualifications it was determined that the facility failed to employ a full-time qualified director of food and nutrition services manager in the absence of a full-time qualified dietitian. Findings include: Current regulatory guidance requires that if a qualified dietitian or other clinically qualified nutrition professional is not employed full-time, the facility must designate a person to serve as the director of food and nutrition services. The director of food and nutrition services must at a minimum meet one of the following qualifications- (A) A certified dietary manager; or (B) A certified food service manager; or (C) Has similar national certification for food service management and safety from a national certifying body; or D) Has an associate's or higher degree in food service management or in hospitality, if the course study includes food service or restaurant management, from an accredited institution of higher learning; or (E) Has 2 or more years of experience in the position of director of food and nutrition services in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain acceptable practices for the storage and service of food to prevent the potential for contamination and microbial growth in food, which increased the risk of food-borne illness. Findings include: Food safety and inspection standards for safe food handling indicate that everything that comes in contact with food must be kept clean and food that is mishandled can lead to foodborne illness. Safe steps in food handling, cooking, and storage are essential in preventing foodborne illness. You cannot always see, smell, or taste harmful bacteria that may cause illness according to the USDA (The United States Department of Agriculture, also known as the Agriculture Department, is the U.S. federal executive department responsible for developing and executing federal laws related to food). Review of a facility General Food Preparation and Handling Policy last reviewed July 1, 2023, indicated that meats, fish, and poultry are defrosted under safe thawing practices: in the refrigerator in a drip…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-02 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, the minutes from resident group meeting and grievances filed with the facility, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care in a manner and environment that promotes each resident's quality of life by failing to respond timely to residents' requests for assistance, including experiences reported by four alert and oriented residents out of four interviewed during a group meeting (Residents 7, 26, 47, and 48), grievances filed by residents (Residents 32, 44, and 72) and two out of 20 residents sampled (Residents 30 and 44). Findings include: A review of grievances filed with the facility dated September 26, 2023, revealed that Resident 44 reported that it takesa while for the nurse aides to respond to her call bell when she rings it for assistance. A review of the minutes from the Residents' Council meeting dated November 21, 2023, revealed that residents in attendance raised concerns that staff are not answering their call…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of grievances filed with the facility (Residents 26, 44, 45, and 228) and the minutes from resident group meeting, observations, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide housekeeping services and maintenance services to maintain a clean and comfortable environment on three of the three nursing units (Units 100, 200, and 300). Findings include: A review of grievances filed with the facility revealed a grievance dated September 19, 2023, indicating that Resident 45's room was not cleaned. The resident's family raised concerns on behalf of the resident regarding the presence of cobwebs with spiders in the resident's closet, dirty window screens, and dirt in the corners of the resident's room. A grievance dated September 26, 2023, revealed that Residents 26 and 44 expressed concerns with garbage cans in their bedrooms and bathrooms not being emptied. A review of the minutes from the Residents Council meeting dated October 26, 2023, revealed residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of select facility policy/protocol and clinical records and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide nursing services consistent with professional standards of practice by failing to follow physician orders for bowel protocol to promote normal bowel activity for one resident (Resident 18) and for the consistent application of prescribed therapeutic devices and preventative measures, skin sleeves and legs rests with foot buddy, for one resident out of 20 sampled (Resident 62). Findings include: According to the American Academy of Family Physicians {The American Academy of Family Physicians is one of the largest medical organizations in the US founded to promote the science and art of family medicine}the primary goal of constipation management should be symptom improvement, and the secondary goal should be the passage of soft, formed stool without straining at least three times per week). The facility policy titled Bowel Protocol, last reviewed by the facility, July…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-02 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — patternProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record reviews, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents received appropriate treatment and services to prevent potential complications for residents with indwelling catheters for two out of the 20 residents sampled (Residents 11 and 30). Findings include: Department of Health & Human Services, USA. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Guideline for Prevention of Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections 2009, last updated June 6, 2019, III Proper Techniques for Urinary Catheter Maintenance, B. Maintain unobstructed urine flow. 2. Keep the collecting bag below the level of the bladder at all times. Do not rest the bag on the floor. A review of facility policy titled Urinary Catheter Care, reviewed by the facility on July 1, 2023, revealed that it is the facility's policy to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infections. The policy indicates that if breaks in aseptic technique, disconnection, or leakage occur,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, PAHAN (Pennsylvania Health Alert Network) infection control guidance, select facility policies, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to initiate necessary infection control precautions for cohorting a resident positive for COVID-19 to prevent the spread of the SARS-CoV-2 virus to uninfected resident. This failure placed the uninfected resident at risk to their health due to the likelihood of contracting the virus by continuing to reside in the same room as the infected resident and resulted in 1 resident out of three sampled being infected with COVID-19 (Resident 58) while residing with COVID positive roommate (Resident 20), and failed to maintain infection control practices related to reduce the potential for infections for one (Resident 8) out of four sampled residents with an indwelling urinary Foley catheter (flexible tube which is placed in the bladder to drain urine) and failed to ensure that infection control practices were implemented to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-02 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of select facility policy and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to timely consult with the physician and notify the resident's interested representative of a change in condition for one resident out of 20 sampled (Resident 64). Findings include: A review of the facility's policy Change in a Resident's Condition or Status last reviewed by the facility July 1, 2023, indicated that the facility shall promptly notify the resident, his or her attending physician, and representative (sponsor) of changes in the resident's medical/mental condition and /or status. A review of the clinical record revealed Resident 64 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease, muscle weakness, history of falling, and dementia. The resident's clinical record identified a resident representative. A review of an admission BIMS (brief interview for mental status - a tool to assess cognitive status) report dated October 31, 2023,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-02 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility's abuse policy, select investigative reports and clinical records, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that three residents were free from verbal abuse out of 20 residents sampled (Resident 67, Resident CR1, and Resident CR2) Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Abuse Policy that was last reviewed by the facility July 1, 2023, revealed that the resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation. The facility must not use verbal, mental, sexual, or physical abuse, corporal punishment or involuntary seclusion. Residents must not be subjected to abuse by anyone, including, but not limited to, facility staff, other residents, consultants or volunteers, staff or other agencies serving the resident, family members or legal guardians, friends or other individuals. The facility defined abuse as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-02 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide restorative nursing services planned to maintain mobility and functional abilities of one of 11 residents sampled (Resident 10). Findings included: A review of the clinical record of Resident 10 revealed admission to the facility on January 12, 2023, with diagnoses to include congestive heart failure (weakness of the heart that leads to build-up of fluid in the lungs and surrounding body tissues), unsteadiness on feet and difficulty walking. A review of Resident 10's Physical Therapy Discharge summary dated [DATE], indicated that the resident was to receive Restorative Nursing Program (RNP) for ambulation. The discharge summary indicated that the ambulation program was established, and staff trained for the resident to ambulate 100 feet with rolling walker with assist of one person. A review of the physician's order dated December 27, 2023, revealed an order for RNP ambulation 100 feet with rolling walker…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, a review of clinical records, investigative reports, and information provided by the facility, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to use safe technique while positioning a resident and assure the presence of planned and prescribed preventative measures to prevent minor injury to one resident out of 13 sampled (Resident 1) and maintain an environment free of potential accident hazards. Findings include: A review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed that the resident had diagnoses to include cerebral infarction (stroke), right sided hemiplegia and hemiparesis (weakness or paralysis), gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD), and osteoporosis (bone softening, weakening). A quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS - a federally mandated standardized assessment process conducted at specific intervals to plan resident care) dated December 6, 2023, indicated that the resident was severely cognitively impaired with a BIMS (brief interview to assess cognitive status) score of 3 (0 - 7 represents severe cognitive impairment) and has…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-02 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of clinical records and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide person-centered care as prescribed to meet the current clinical needs, failed to ensure the ready availability of prescribed emergency supplies, and failed to follow physician orders for management of a PICC line [(Percutaneously Inserted Central Catheter) for one resident out of 20 sampled residents (Resident 8). Findings include: A review of clinical records revealed Resident 8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include sepsis (a condition in which the immune system has a dangerous reaction to an infection), and urinary tract infection, and ESBL (Extended Spectrum Beta Lactamase, a bacteria resistant to most antibiotics) in the urine. Review of Resident 8's hospital record, Procedure Note for Interventional Radiology, dated December 18, 2023, revealed that the resident underwent a procedure for a single lumen PICC placement in her right arm . Catheter total length…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-02 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement an interdisciplinary plan and approaches for direct care staff to use in managing dementia related behaviors for one resident out of five sampled residents (Resident 64). Findings include: A review of the clinical record revealed Resident 64 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease, muscle weakness, history of falling, and dementia. A review of an admission BIMS (brief interview for mental status - a tool to assess cognitive status) report dated October 31, 2023, indicated that the resident was severely cognitively impaired with a BIMS score of 0. Resident 64's care plan initiated October 31, 2023, revealed that the resident had a progressive decline in intellectual functioning characterized by deficit in memory, judgment, decision making and thought process related to Alzheimer's and Dementia. The resident's goal was that the resident will…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-02 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and a staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident's drug regimen was free of unnecessary antibiotic drugs for one out of 20 residents sampled (Resident 11). Findings included: A clinical record review revealed that Resident 11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include dementia and obstructive and reflux uropathy (urine is not able to drain through the urinary tract). A nursing progress note dated September 28, 2023, at 12:50 PM revealed that the certified nurse practitioner was made aware of the resident's increased confusion, suprapubic pain, and exit-seeking behaviors. The note indicated that the nurse practitioner ordered lab work, blood cultures, and urinalysis. A physician order dated September 28, 2023, at 3:00 PM for Resident 11 to have a urinalysis and culture and sensitivity (a test to determine the type of organisms in the urinary tract and antibiotic treatments that are effective to treat specific…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-02 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of select facility policy, clinical records, and a staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to offer and/or provide pneumococcal immunization for residents including one of the five residents sampled for immunizations (Resident 61). Findings include: A review of facility policy titled Pneumococcal Vaccine, reviewed by the facility on July 1, 2023, revealed that it is the facility's policy to offer pneumococcal vaccines to aid in preventing pneumonia or pneumococcal infections. The policy indicates that the administration of pneumococcal vaccines or re-vaccinations will be made in accordance with current Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations at the time of vaccination. A review of the CDC's Pneumococcal Vaccination: Summary of Who and When to Vaccinate, September 22, 2023, indicates for adults [AGE] years of age or older who only received PCV13 and don't have an immunocompromising condition, cochlear implant, or cerebrospinal fluid leak: Give 1 dose…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-23 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and select investigative reports and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care necessary to prevent complications with a gastric feeding tube for one resident out of three sampled (Resident CR1). Findings include: Review of Resident CR1's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses, which included dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and gastrostomy status (a gastrostomy tube inserted into his stomach). The resident had an admission physician order for Nutren 1.5 Enteral Liquid (liquid feeding formula) Give 60 milliliters per hour (ml/hr) via PEG-Tube (tube that is placed directly into the stomach through an abdominal wall incision for administration of food, fluids, and medications. The most common type is a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy {PEG} tube) every shift, and a bolus water flush 200 ml every 4 hours for hydration. The order also noted that the staff were to check the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2026-05-13 · tag F0552 — patternEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, grievance form review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to timely inform and update an interested family member regarding changes in condition, ongoing assessments, and changes in treatment for one of nine residents reviewed (Resident 1).Findings include:Clinical record review revealed that Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of spinal stenosis (narrowing between the spaces between the spines, putting pressure on the nerves causing pain in arms and legs) and kidney disease. A review of Resident 1's admission Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS, a federally mandated standardized assessment process conducted periodically to plan resident care) dated March 20, 2026, revealed that Resident 1 is cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 13 (Brief Interview for Mental Status, a tool within the Cognitive Section of the MDS that is used to assess the resident's attention, orientation, and ability to register and recall new…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-01-17 for 32 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-05-02 for 61 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to PRIORITY HEALTHCARE GROUP — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 3.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 3.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
The other 11 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.0★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAYBROOK-P OPCO HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 08/15/2016 |
| BL CAPITAL GROUP HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 24% | since 01/28/2020 |
| FAIR OAKS FAMILY HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 12% | since 01/28/2020 |
| SAMARA HOLDINGS COMPANY LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 10% | since 01/28/2020 |
| STRAWBERRY HILL HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 11% | since 01/28/2020 |
| SEBBAG, GABRIEL | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 5% | since 08/15/2016 |
| CLINICAL CONSULTING SERVICES LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2019 |
| PRIORITY CARE GROUP LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 01/01/2019 |
| SUMMATION FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2019 |
| BASHA, SAMER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2018 |
| WHITMIRE, DENISE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/17/2021 |
| MAYBROOK-P ORANGEVILLE OPCO, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/15/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 89% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in PA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395899. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.