Barre Gardens Nursing and Rehab, LLC
378 Prospect Street, Barre, VT 05641 · For profit - Partnership · 96 certified beds · (802) 476-4166 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0569)
- inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (53) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $142,045 in federal fines (most recent 2025-11-13)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (79%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 1 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 1 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 22.9% | 19.3% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 12.6% | 6.6% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.8% | 0.7% | 0.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 4.9% | 2.4% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 5.2% | 13.0% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 10.3% | 5.9% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 16.3% | 17.4% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 11.9% | 16.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 97.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 7.8% | 5.3% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 32.0% | 26.8% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 16.3% | 19.9% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 3.2% | 1.1% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 65.0% | 78.5% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 26.9% | 22.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 22.4% | 17.9% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.98 | 1.52 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 3.12 | 2.88 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
51.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 187 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 53.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 93 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 45% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 51.2%CMS range 44.4–57.6 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.9%CMS range 8.0–13.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 53.8% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 41.9% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 51.6% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 84.1% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 94.9% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 4.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.6%CMS range 4.1–10.1 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.92 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 96 beds and averages 81.2 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.49 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.547 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.07 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.18 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.61 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.64 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 79% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
53 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 40 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2025-11-13 · tag F0841 — widespreadDesignate a physician to serve as medical director responsible for implementation of resident care policies and coordination of medical care in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the Medical Director fulfilled his/her responsibility to coordinate medical care with facility providers and assist the facility with the development and implementation of resident care policies. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility.Findings include:Per review of the facility's Medical Director Services policy [policy undated] on 11/13/25, the scope of services for the Medical Director will include:-Ensuring that each resident's responsible physician attends to the resident's medical needs--Periodic review and development of medical care policies and procedures as required to ensure compliance with Federal, State, and local laws, rules, and regulations.An interview was conducted with the facility's Medical Director on 11/13/25 at 2:02 PM. The Medical Director [MD] stated there was no system in place to monitor regulatory visits by physicians, and that they were working on a process regarding required regulatory visits. The MD stated, There is no excuse, they…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · L2025-11-13 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespreadHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review of the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program (QAPI), and facility policy review, the facility failed to address all systems of care in a comprehensive manner by identifying problems and opportunities for improvement in the areas of infection control, environment, and Medical Director. As a result, GAS (group A strep) spread through the facility and 12 residents developed symptoms of GAS. 2 of 3 sampled residents with symptoms of GAS were hospitalized with sepsis due to cellulitis (Residents #1 and #2). This citation is at the immediate jeopardy level as these failures put all residents at risk for serious harm and/or death. Findings include:Facility policy titled Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement, last revised 9/2022, reads Our facility will. Present documentation and evidence of its ongoing QAPI program's implementation and the facility's compliance with requirements to a State Survey Agency, Federal surveyor or CMS upon request.Steps for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2025-11-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to provide a system for preventing, identifying, reporting, investigating, and controlling infections and communicable diseases for all residents, staff, volunteers, visitors, and other individuals providing services under a contractual arrangement based upon the facility assessment conducted according to S483.71 and following accepted national standards. This has the potential to impact all residents. Findings include: A review of the facility's Coronavirus Disease- Infection Prevention and Control Measures Policy Statement [Version 2.0 Revised 2023] includes: This facility follows infection prevention and control (IPC) practices recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to prevent the transmission of COVID-19 within the facility. Policy Interpretation and Implementation:1.The infection prevention and control measures that are implemented to address the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic are incorporated into the facility infection prevention and control plan. These measures include: a. encouraging…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-06-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that food items were stored in accordance with professional standards, that the kitchen was kept neat and orderly, and that food service equipment were clean or dry. This is a repeat deficiency for this facility, with the violation cited during the previous three recertification surveys, dated 6/25/25, 5/9/24, and 4/26/23, and partial survey dated 11/13/25. Findings include:During a tour of the kitchen with the Kitchen Manager on 6/15/2026 at approximately 9:56 AM, the following observations were made:sandwiches on a plate in the walk-in fridge, not dated. The Kitchen Manager confirmed that they were not dated.a bag of opened chicken cutlets in freezer, not dated. The Kitchen Manager confirmed that they were not dated.multiple juice spill puddles in the kitchen fridge. Per interview with the kitchen manager, he stated that the fridge gets cleaned at the end of each day.the standing mixer had dried food particles on it. The Kitchen Manager stated that they don't use it often, but confirmed that it was dirty and could…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-06-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow, maintain, implement their legionella water management plan and implement the use of personal protective equipment when required. This has the potential to impact all residents. This is a repeat deficiency for this facility, with the violation cited during a previous partial survey, dated 11/13/25. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility's Legionella Water Management Plan included an assessment to identify areas for Legionella spread and measures to prevent growth and how to monitor them. Per interview with the Maintenance Director on 6/17/26 at 10:30 AM and 1:09 PM, he was unable to provide evidence of measures to prevent Legionella growth put in place and how the facility was monitoring them. He was unable to say what standards the facility was following for water safety practices. He said he disagreed with the plan and had thrown it away. Per interview with the Infection Preventionist and Director of Nursing (DON) on 06/16/2026 at 9:49 AM, when asked what water safety standards they were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident was treated with dignity for 1 of 27 sampled residents (Resident #41). This is a repeat deficiency for this facility, with the violation cited during a previous partial survey, dated 11/13/25. Findings include:1.) Per interview on 6/15/2026 at approximately 11:28 AM, Licensed Nurse Aide (LNA) #1 was asked to bring Resident #41 to their room to speak in private. LNA #1 stated that the resident only answers the same things over and over again and is not all there. When in the room with Resident #41 they stated that they needed to go to the bathroom and became a little agitated worrying about the chair and floor getting wet.At approximately 11:37 AM, LNA #1 and #2 were transferring Resident #41 with the Hoyer lift. During this process the resident was becoming more agitated, upset, and concerned about getting the floor wet and stated that they didn't know what they were doing around here. LNA #1 then responded, in hearing range of Resident #41, that she knew asking all of those questions…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to keep nails trimmed for 1 of 27 residents (Resident #39). Findings include:Per interview on 6/15/2026 at approximately 10:37 AM, Resident #39 was observed to have very long nails and verbalized that they do not like it. Per record review, Resident #39's care plan states that they need assistance with personal hygiene/care. Per interview on 6/17/2026 at approximately 10:26 AM, the Licensed Nursing Assistant (LNA) verbalized that nails are done with resident care. Per interview on 6/17/2026 at approximately 10:34 AM, the Registered Nurse (RN) explained that residents' nails get done as needed on shower days. When in the residents' room the nurse confirmed that Resident #39's nails were too long and probably had not been done in some time.Per interview on 6/17/2026 at approximately 11:31 AM, the RN showed the shower list with the resident listed for every Tuesday evening. Per record review Resident #39's last shower was on 6/16/26.Per the facility's Fingernails/Toenails, Care of Policy, last revision in February…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident medications were properly stored for 2 out of 27 residents (Resident #70 and Resident #71). This is a repeat deficiency for this facility, with the violation cited during the previous recertification survey, dated 6/25/25 and partial survey dated 11/13/25. Findings include: 1.) Per observation on 6/15/26 at 2:57 PM, Resident #70 had a bottle of Artificial Tears at their bedside table. Per interview on 6/15/26 at 3:00 PM with a Registered Nurse (RN), he reported that the bottle of Artificial Tears should be in the medication cart. Resident #70 indicated that they were again due for more drops and then self-administered in front of the RN. The RN showed no indications that he knew when the next drops were due. The RN then left the room leaving the bottle of drops behind after stating that they should be in the medication cart. Per interview on 6/15/26 at 3:36 PM with the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) assigned to the medication cart, she reported that a prescription medication like the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-20 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain a clean and homelike environment for residents who use the common areas by failing to maintain clean air vents for three out of three common areas. Findings include:Per review of the facility policy titled Departmental (Maintenance)-Plumbing, HVAC and Related Systems revised 2011, it states to clean air vents and air handling units at least annually.Per review of a NADCA (National Air Duct Cleaners Association) certified company, [NAME] Duct and Dryer Vent Cleaning LLC website (Duct and Vent Cleaning in Nursing Homes and Hospitals | [NAME] Duct & Dryer Vent Cleaning, LLC), they identify that air ducts (a system that distributes air throughout a building) can accumulate dust debris, allergens, and pathogens overtime and that in hospitals and nursing homes it can pose an increased risk to residents with compromised immune systems or respiratory issues leading to serious health risks. Additionally, it states that dirty ducts can circulate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-11-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — widespreadHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that areas used for bathing/showering, resident rooms, and a resident gathering area were clean, safe, and homelike. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. This is a repeat deficiency for this facility, with the violation cited during the previous two recertification surveys, dated 6/25/25 and 5/9/24, and partial survey dated 4/17/25. Findings include: During the initial tour of the facility on 11/4/25 at approximately 10:40 AM the following observations were made: Wing 1 short hall, room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER] appeared dirty with loose debris on the floor. At the end of Wing 1 short hall there was a room that contained a tub room, a bathroom, and a shower room. The tub room revealed a tub chair that had a loose white powdery substance on the seat and the foot pedals had a thick white and gray substance within the pattern of both foot pedals. The shower room area…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-11-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that all food was stored safely and to ensure that sanitary conditions for safe food handling were maintained. This has the potential to impact all residents. This is a repeat deficiency for this facility, with violations cited during the previous three recertification surveys, dated 4/26/23, 5/9/24, and 6/25/25. Findings include:A kitchen tour was conducted with a Dietary Staff Member on 11/13/25 at 11:40 AM. Per observation of the dry food storage area, the following items were found improperly stored:Gluten free pasta, (1) expired June 11, 2024, (3) expired July 20, 2024; Baking mix, expired 4/24/24; Pasta, expired May 3, 2025; Hormel Thick & Easy Clear Thickened Cranberry Juice Cocktail, dated 10/24, instructions on back of label discard if not used within 10 days of opening; andHormel Thick & Easy Clear Thickened Orange Juice Cocktail, dated 10/24, instructions on back of label discard if not used within 10 days of opening. Per interview on 11/13/25 at 11:55 AM, the Dietary Staff Member stated the above items…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-11-13 · tag F0887 — widespreadEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement policies and procedures to ensure when COVID-19 vaccine is available to the facility, each resident and staff member is offered the COVID-19 vaccine unless the immunization is medically contraindicated or the resident or staff member has already been immunized.Findings include:A review of the facility's Coronavirus Disease- Infection Prevention and Control Measures Policy Statement [Version 2.0 Revised 2023] includes: This facility follows infection prevention and control (IPC) practices recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to prevent the transmission of COVID-19 within the facility. Policy Interpretation and Implementation:1.The infection prevention and control measures that are implemented to address the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic are incorporated into the facility infection prevention and control plan. These measures include: a. encouraging staff, residents and visitors to remain up-to-date with all COVID-19 vaccine doses.A review of the facility's documented COVID-19 outbreak…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-13 · tag F0712 — patternEnsure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure physician visits occurred every 30 days for the first 90 days after admission, and at least once every 60 thereafter for 12 of 25 residents (Resident # 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 8, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16, and 17). Findings include: Per review of the facility policy titled Physician Services dated 2/21, it states that the medical care of each resident is supervised by a licensed physician and that supervising the medical care of residents includes. conducting routine required visits.Physician visits, frequency of visits, emergency care of residents, etc., are provided in accordance with current OBRA regulations and facility policy. 1.Review of Resident #6's medical record shows that Resident #6 has not had a regulatory visit since 8/7/25, which was with a Nurse Practitioner (NP), and as of 11/13/25 did not have a regulatory visit within sixty days with a Physician. 2.Review of Resident #7's Physician visits revealed that Resident #7 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 40 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview it was determined that the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of her/his quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality for 1 resident in a sample of 9 residents. (Resident #4).Findings include:Per record review, Resident #4 has diagnoses that include Alzheimer's disease, dementia, bipolar disease, schizophrenia, and need for assistance with personal care. Per Resident #4's care plan, revised 11/4/25, EATING: [She/he] requires extensive assist from staff participation to eat. Staff please encourage resident to open hand to engage in self-feeding and holding cup during meals. On 11/4/25 at 12:55 PM, an observation was conducted of Resident #4 during lunch. An LNA (licensed nursing assistant) was observed assisting the resident with eating. She/he was standing next to resident and leaning over to place the food in the resident's mouth. The LNA repeated the process of standing next to the resident and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-13 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that 1 resident in the applicable sample (Resident #6) received proper foot care.Findings include:Per observation on 11/13/25 at 10:21 AM, Resident #6 was sitting barefoot at the edge of the bed with his/her feet on the floor. Resident #6's feet appeared to be dry and had long discolored toenails that were thick.Per interview with Resident #6 on 11/13/25 at 10:21 AM, they reported that their toenails are very long and that it is an issue, they haven't had their nails trimmed in a long time or seen a podiatrist.Per record review of Resident #6's care plan dated 9/19/25, s/he is care planned for skin breakdown due to impaired mobility, DM (Diabetes Mellitus), and peripheral vascular disease. Interventions include Podiatry consult as needed with a date of 3/8/23. The care plan also identifies that the resident has an ADL (activities of daily living) self-care performance deficient and requires assistance with personal hygiene, dated 3/8/23.Per review of the facilities policy titled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-13 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement interventions to address the residents' dementia care needs for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #10).Findings include:Per an observation on [DATE] at 6:43 PM at a nurse's station, Resident #10 was asking to call his/her family member. A Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) was observed telling Resident #10 that she couldn't call his/her family member because they had died. Upon hearing this, Resident #10 got visibly upset and again asked for the LPN to call Resident #10 's family member and called the LPN a liar. The phone started ringing and Resident #10 was asking for them to pick it up saying it might be their family member, and the nurse was dismissive towards the Resident saying that it couldn't be. At 6:45 PM, the Resident #10 again asked to call the family member to which the LPN again stated that they had passed and that we told you this months ago, but you keep on forgetting. Resident #10 then stated that they were going to try…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure only authorized personnel had access to the medication storage rooms. This is a repeat deficiency for this facility, with the violation cited during the previous recertification surveys, dated 6/25/25. Findings include:Per observation on 11/4/25 at 12:45 PM, a pharmacy delivery was accepted by an LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse). The delivery person and LPN went into the medication room together. The LPN emerged without the delivery person who remained alone in the medication room for approximately 5 minutes before exiting.Per interview on 11/4/25 at 1:00 PM, the LPN confirmed that the delivery person should not go into the medication room alone. The LPN confirmed that he/she was left alone in the medication room. Per interview with the Administrator on 11/4/25 at 2:45 PM, they confirmed the delivery person should not have been in the medication room alone.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-13 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolatedEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of employee training records and interview, the facility failed to provide evidence of the minimum 12 hours of nurse aide training per year required to ensure the continuing competence of the LNAs (Licensed Nursing Assistants) for 1 (LNA #1) of 3 LNAs sampled. Findings include:Per review of the training records, three LNAs sampled were noted to have start dates before the 2025 calendar year. LNA #1's education file lacked documentation of evidence of the 12 hours of training per year required to meet identified staff or resident needs.Per interview on 11/13/25 at 5:18 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was unable to provide evidence that the LNA #1 had completed their required 12-hour annual training.
- Potential for harm · F2025-06-25 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a qualified dietitian or other clinically qualified nutrition professional is employed full-time, or designate a person to serve as the director of food and nutrition services who meets the minimum qualifications. Findings include: Per interview with the Administrator on 6/25/25 at 10:28 AM, the Administrator stated they did not have a dietary manager and were currently in the process of hiring one. The administrator was unable to provide any evidence that the facility had a dietary manager. The Administrator confirmed that the dietician for the facility was part-time and works 2 to 3 days a week. Per interview with the kitchen staff member on 6/25/24 at 10:38 AM, the kitchen staff member stated that the facility did not have a dietary manager For about six months .I do pretty much everything here. An interview was conducted with the registered dietician on 6/25/25 at 12:06 PM. The dietician confirmed that she only works Two days a week for 8…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety and failed to maintain a sanitary kitchen. This is a repeat deficiency for this facility, with the violation cited during the previous recertification survey, dated 5/9/24. Findings include: Per observation of the kitchen on 6/23/25 at 10:42 AM, the floor under the storage shelves had debris on the floor. Per observation of the walk-in refrigerator on 6/23/25 at approximately 10:45 AM there was a 5 pound container of low fat cottage cheese with macaroni and beef in it dated 6/14[2025]-6/18 [2025]. There was a container of meat sauce dated 6/14 [2025]-6/18 [2025]. There was a package of 8 hot dogs on the third shelf from the top. Per interview with the kitchen staff member on 6/23/25 at 10:53 AM, she confirmed that the items were past their expiration date, stating, I didn't see those [items]. I'll get rid of them. The kitchen staff member also confirmed that the floor under the shelves had debris on it. The kitchen staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-25 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Per observations made during the survey, Resident #23 was observed in her/his room in bed without a fitted sheet on 6/25/2025 at 9:25 AM and at 2:40 PM. Throughout the survey, Resident #23 was observed without sheets properly fitted to her/his bed. Per interview with Resident #23 on 06/25/2025 at 09:25 AM, Resident #23 reported that she/he never has the right size fitted sheet and that it happens all the time and that the nursing assistants can never find bariatric sized bed sheets for his/her bed. Per interview with a Licensed Nursing Assistant (LNA) on 6/25/2025 at 9:34 AM, she reported they run out of towels and clean laundry about twice a week and they don't have enough bariatric sheets. Per interview with another Licensed Nursing Assistant (LNA) on 6/25/2025 at 10:00 AM, she reported that they run out of clean linens and that it delays resident care. She also reported that they only have five bariatric bed sheets so they can't always find one for a bariatric resident's bed. Per interview with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-25 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to review and revise resident care plans for 2 residents related to falls (Residents #34 and #1) and for 2 residents related to pressure ulcers (Residents #39 and #9), of a sample of 23 residents. This is a repeat deficiency for this facility, with the violation cited during the previous recertification survey, dated 5/9/24. Findings include: 1) Per record review, Resident # 39 has diagnoses that include: hemiplegia and hemiparesis ( paralysis and weakness on one side of the body), chronic kidney disease stage 3 ( moderate kidney damage), and osteomyelitis (infection of the bone) of the pelvis. On 6/2/25, a Weekly Skin Review notes a blister on the right heel. Skin prep is applied, and the wound is covered with a foam dressing. On 6/9/25, a weekly skin check revealed a blister on the right heel with a 1 cm x 1 cm red area in the center. A progress note dated 6/15/2025 reveals a hospital transfer, where it was noted that resident #39 had a Deep Tissue Injury to the right heel, measuring 4 centimeters (cm) in length, 5 cm in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents remained as free from accidents as possible related to resident altercations and falls for 2 of the 9 sampled residents (Residents #1 and #34) by failing to provide adequate supervision and create and implement effective, timely interventions that would reduce the likelihood of future accidents related to supervision. As a result, Resident #1 suffered a fall that resulted in pain, a large hematoma above his/her left eye, and a fracture of the left hip, which required surgery. Findings include: 1. Per record review, Resident #1 has diagnoses that include a history of falls, osteoporosis, and failure to thrive. Resident #1 is alert and oriented, and per record review, an MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 was independent for ambulation with a walker prior to the incident on 6/7/25. Per hospital physician note dated 6/8/25, Resident #1 reported to the physician that s/he was struck several times by his/her roommate's [Resident #34]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and observation, the facility failed to safely store locked medications for 2 of 2 units. Findings include: During observations on Wing 1 on 6/23/2025 at 12:51 PM two medication treatment carts were noted to be unlocked. There were three residents in the nurse's station, three residents in the sunroom, and no staff observed in-sight of the medication treatment carts. On 6/23/2025 at 12:53 PM, the Unit Manager confirmed that both medication treatment carts were unlocked and should have been locked. Per record review of the facility's policy titled Medication Storage in the Facility, it states Medication rooms, carts, and medication supplies are locked or attended by person with authorized access. While exiting the building on 6/25/2025 at 5:06 PM a medication cart was noticed to be unlocked. The medication cart was unlocked outside of the resident's rooms past one of the nurse's stations. There was one resident in sight who was interacting with the phone at the nurse's station with no staff members in sight. A nurse came and locked the cart after being notified by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-25 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents are free from unnecessary psychotropic medications for one of five sampled residents (Resident #17) as evidenced by administration of prn (as needed) psychotropic medications without a discontinued date. Findings include: Per record review, Resident #17 was prescribed Lorazepam (Ativan, a medication used for anxiety) 0.5 mg (milligram) tablet: Give one tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed for agitation. This medication was prescribed on 6/7/25. Resident #17 was also prescribed Haloperidol Lactate Oral Concentrate 2 MG/ML [two milligrams per milliliter]: Give 0.5 mL [milliliters] every six hours as needed for agitation. This medication was prescribed on 6/8/25. Per record review of Resident #17's June 2025 MAR [Medication Administration Record] Resident #17 was administered the Lorazepam on 6/12/25, 6/14/25, 6/15/25, 6/16/25, 6/17/25, 6/21/25, 6/23/24, and 6/24/25. Resident #17 was never administered the Haloperidol. Per record review of the facility's Psychotropic Medication Use policy [last…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive care plan by failing to notify the provider of specific symptoms for 1 of 23 Residents (Resident #23). This is a repeat deficiency for this facility, with the violation cited during the previous recertification survey, dated 5/9/24. Findings include: Per interview with Resident #23 on 6/23/2025 at 11:44 AM, she/he reported that they requested to be sent to the hospital when she/he wasn't feeling well, but the facility wouldn't send her/him when she/he asked. Resident #23 reports having spent time in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and that she/he had double pneumonia. Per record review, Resident #23 is care planned for altered cardiovascular status with the interventions of observing, documenting, and reporting symptoms to the Medical Doctor including, chest pain or pressure especially with activity, heartburn, nausea and vomiting, shortness of breath, excessive sweating, dependent edema, changes in cap refill, colour…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-25 · tag F0730 — isolatedObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and employee files, the facility failed to ensure annual performance evaluations were completed for 3 of 3 Licensed Nursing Assistants (LNAs) in the applicable sample (LNA #1, #2, and #3). Findings include: Per review of employee files for LNAs that have worked at the facility for longer than a year, there were no nurse aide performance evaluations completed within the past year for LNA #1, hired on 2/17/24, LNA #2, hired on 4/13/2001, and LNA #3, hired on 4/6/21. Per interview on 6/25/25 at approximately 3:11 PM, the Administrator confirmed that the facility did not have annual performance evaluations for the above 3 LNAs.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their processes for documenting high value personal property for one of three resident (Resident #1). Findings include: Per interview on 4/16/25 at 1:23 PM with Resident #1's Durable Power of Attorney (DPOA) s/he stated that s/he was not aware that Resident #1's hearing aids were missing until s/he went to the facility to pick up his/her belongings. S/He stated that the nurse on duty told him/her that Resident #1's hearing aids had been missing for about two weeks before s/he passed on 5/1/24. S/He stated that Resident #1's hearing aids cost $6,495.00. S/He stated that s/he was never notified that the hearing aids were lost and would have come in the help look for them if known. Per record review of nurse's notes dated 4/5/24 - 4/25/24, Resident #1's hearing aids were documented as missing. There is no documentation that the DPOA was notified of the missing hearing aids. Per interview on 4/16/25 at 11:17 AM, the Administrator stated that when a resident is admitted to the facility, a Licensed Nursing Assistant (LNA)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-17 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assist a resident to schedule a follow-up appointment with a provider specializing in the treatment of hearing impairment for one of three residents in the sample (Resident #1). Findings include: Resident #1 was admitted to Barre Gardens with a pair of reprogrammable hearing aids on 3/6/24. Per record review, Resident #1's has a Care Plan intervention dated 3/7/24 that reads, Resident uses bilateral hearing aids. Prefers to keep at bedside. A 4/2/2024 nursing note reveals, Noted [s/he] did not have [his/her] right hearing aid.- social services made aware. Per record review, a nursing notes dated 4/6/24 reads, Unable to find hearing aids this shift. Social services message left regarding hearing aids. Per record review from 4/6/24 through 4/25/24, nursing documentation continues to show both of Resident #1's hearing aids are missing. There is not any documentation that indicates the Durable Power of Attorney (DPOA) was notified that Resident #1's hearing aids were lost. Per interview on 4/16/25 at 9:45 AM with the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-05 · tag F0569 — isolatedNotify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received funds and jurisdiction of those funds within thirty days for one resident (Resident #1) out of three sampled residents. Findings include: Per telephone interview on [DATE] at 11:57 AM, Resident #1's Family Representative, who is charge of Resident #1's estate, stated that s/he requested a reimbursement of funds after the resident passed away on [DATE]. S/he stated s/he did not receive a check from the facility of approximately $1400 until May or June [of 2024]. The Family Representative expressed frustration with the situation. Per record review, Resident #1 passed away on [DATE]. A review of the Summation Financial Services Check Request Form states that the date of request was [DATE] for $1464.60 to be delivered to the Family Representative. Per record review, there is a FedEx delivery tracking document that states that the check was delivered on [DATE] at 11:42 AM. This was received 85 days after Resident #1 passed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-02 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to protect and promote the rights of 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #1) by failing to treat the Resident with respect and dignity in a manner and in an environment that promotes the maintenance or enhancement of their quality of life. Findings include: Per record review, Resident #1 resided in the facility from [DATE] to 6/20/24 with diagnoses of hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness of one entire side of the body) following a cerebral infarction (a pathologic process that results in an area of dead tissue in the brain) affecting his/her right side and a displaced fracture of his/her right humerus. Per review of the facility's initial report submitted to the State Agency on 8/29/2024 and written witness statements, a Licensed Nursing Assistant (LNA) behaved disrespectfully and undignified toward the resident. A witness statement dated 6/16/2024 from a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) and a witness statement…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — widespreadHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure each resident has a right to self-determination and access to persons and services outside of the facility, by locking all doors to the facility 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. By creating a locked facility, there is a failure to ensure the right of each resident to exercise their rights as a citizen (or resident) of the United States or make personal choices about going outside without interference. This has the potential to affect all residents of the facility and all visitors, including family, legal representatives and advocates. The facility also failed to ensure residents had the right to get up at the time they want for 1 of 24 sampled residents (Resident #47), failed to have resolution for missing clothing for 3 of 24 sampled residents (Residents #47, #18, and #15), failed to schedule Resident Council meetings at times determined by the residents, and failed to ensure that 2 of 7 residents being served and assisted with meals were treated with dignity and respect, by not providing meals and nutrition while all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-05-09 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespreadEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, resident interviews, staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that food served to Residents is palatable, attractive, and at an appetizing temperature. Findings include: Per observation on 5/6/24 at approximately 12:30 PM, Resident #77 was exerting much energy and struggling to cut a chicken patty served to them for lunch with a metal fork and knife. Resident #77's roommate, Resident #243, was eating the chicken patty uncut with their hands. When asked why they were eating the patty this way, Resident #243 stated that it was difficult to cut and hard as a rock. Resident #243 then proceeded to bang the side of the patty on their bedside table and it made a hard clunking sound. On 5/6/24 at approximately 12:45 PM, this surveyor requested a lunch tray from both the Wing 1 steam table and the dining room steam table. Both trays were prepared after all other resident meals were plated and placed on the last meal cart sent to the units. The test trays were then sampled after the last resident on the last meal cart for each steam table was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-05-09 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — widespreadEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents were served a nourishing snack at bedtime when the time between dinner and breakfast the following morning is more than 14 hours. The facility also failed to ensure that the Resident Council agrees to this amount of time between dinner and breakfast the following morning. Findings include: 1. Per review of the facility meal schedules, Residents are served breakfast at 8:00 AM and Dinner at 5:00 PM. There are 15 hours that elapse between the dinner meal and the breakfast meal the following morning. Per interview on 5/7/24 at approximately 4:00 PM, the following Residents were interviewed regarding bedtime snacks: - Resident #187, admitted on [DATE] with a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status Score) of 13 (cognitively intact), stated that they have never been offered a snack before bed by staff. - Resident #240, admitted on [DATE] with a BIMS of 15 (cognitively intact), stated that they have never been offered a snack…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Per observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that it stores and prepares food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Findings include: 1. Per an initial tour of the facility kitchen on 5/6/24 at approximately 9:30 AM, the following conditions were observed: - The reach-in refrigerator had a large container of bulk iced tea with a use by date of 5/4/24. - A steam table had dried, crusted food drippings on the bottom shelf as well as an unlabeled bag of hamburger buns with copious amounts of condensation on the inside of the bag. - Two food prep tables used for the breakfast service were no longer in use and had spilled milk, dropped applesauce, and copious amounts of crumbs spread across them. - A small table on the far wall of the kitchen was covered with food particles, an opened container of peanut butter with the lid askew, a pan of melted margarine/butter with a spoon inside, an opened bag of sliced bread, as well as other kitchen implements and clean containers. - The floors of the kitchen were dirty with dried…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-05-09 · tag F0837 — widespreadEstablish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility Governing Body failed to ensure that facility policies were accessible to all staff members operating the facility and providing care to the facility's residents. This has the potential to affect all residents in the facility. Findings include: Per facility policy titled Governing Body, [undated], states the Governing Body is responsible for establishing and implementing policies regarding management and operation of the facility. Per interview on 5/08/24 at 12:58 PM, the Administrator was unable to access all facility policies. When asked how facility staff access policies, the Administrator explained that they would get them through the cooperate leadership team. S/He explained that policies are on the desktop computers but staff do not have access to them. S/He explained that it has always been that way and his/her corporate is aware of this issue. Per interview on 5/9/23 at 11:51 AM, a Licensed Practical Nurse was asked to pull up facility policies. S/He explained that, while in theory s/he should be able to access all care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-05-09 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and review of the facility assessment the facility failed to ensure that the required individuals including a representative of the governing body and the medical director were involved in the development of the facility assessment. This has the potential to affect all residents. Findings include: Per review of the facility assessment last updated on 4/9/2024, persons involved in completing the assessment lists: Administrator [name omitted] LNHA (Licensed Nursing Home Administrator); Director of Nursing: [name omitted] RN (Registered Nurse); Governing body Representative: LNHA; Medical Director: MD. Per interview on 5/09/24 at 1:23 PM, the Medical Director stated that s/he has not been involved in developing, reviewing, or revising the facility assessment. Per interview with the Administrator on 5/9/24 at 4:33 PM, s/he explained that the governing body is not involved in developing the facility assessment. The Administrator stated that s/he does report when the facility assessment was last updated during compliance calls with the governing body. The Administrator…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-09 · tag F0841 — widespreadDesignate a physician to serve as medical director responsible for implementation of resident care policies and coordination of medical care in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and review of facility policies, the facility failed to ensure that the Medical Director fulfilled his/her responsibility to coordinate medical care with facility providers and assist the facility with the development and implementation of resident care policies. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Facility policy titled Medical Director Responsibilities, dated 2023, states 4. The Medical Director's responsibilities include participation in: a. Administrative decisions including recommending, developing and approving facility policies related to resident care of physical, mental and psychosocial well -being; c. Organizing and coordinating physician services and services provided by other professionals as they relate to resident care; 8. Medical Director will assist in the development of systems to monitor the performance of the health care practitioners including . ensuring other licensed practitioners (e.g., nurse practitioners) who may perform physician delegated tasks act within the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections as evidenced by the improper use of PPE (personal protective equipment) for 1 resident on precautions (Resident #24) and the failure to implement infection prevention practices related to blood glucose monitoring. Findings include: 1. Per record review, Resident #24 has physician orders dated 5/7/24 that read: Contact and Droplet Precautions related to respiratory cold symptoms one time only for 7 days. [Contact precautions [are] Used for patients/residents that have an infection that can be spread by contact with the person's skin, mucous membranes, feces, vomit, urine, wound drainage, or other body fluids, or by contact with equipment or environmental surfaces that may be contaminated by the patient/resident or by his/her secretions…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based upon observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment was maintained for the residents on 1 of 2 units (Unit 1). Findings include: 1. Observation on 5/6/24 at approximately 12:57 PM of Resident #47 and #50's room revealed a strip approximately 4-6 inches wide at chair rail level, that runs the full length of the right hand side of the residents room. The strip was falling off the wall and was laying on the foot of Resident #47's bed. Interview on 5/6/24 at approximately 1 PM with Resident #50, they confirmed that this chair rail strip keeps falling off and the maintenance man keeps re-gluing it and placing it back on the wall. Interview on 5/6/24 at approximately 1:15 PM with Resident #47, they confirmed that this chair rail strip keeps falling off and the maintenance man keeps re-gluing it and putting it back on the wall. Resident #47 stated that their spouse has complained to staff about this many times and this strip just keeps getting put back up on the wall. The resident said, if the maintenance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-09 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to revise the comprehensive care plan as the resident's plan of care changes for 2 of 27 sampled residents (Resident #23 and #62) related to catheter use and pain management for Resident #23 and activity preference for Resident #62. Findings include: 1. Per record review Resident #23 was admitted on [DATE] for rehabilitation following a hospital stay related to a urinary tract infection and sepsis. S/He has diagnoses that include uropathy (blockage in the urinary tract), bladder cancer, heart failure, chronic pulmonary embolism (a blood clot that forms a blockage in the artery of the lung), rheumatoid arthritis, peripheral neuropathy (nerve damage), and lung cancer. A 10/30/23 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS; a comprehensive assessment used as a care-planning tool) reveals that Resident #23 was admitted without a catheter and has moderate pain for which s/he has received as need pain medication and is not on a scheduled pain medication regime. 1.a.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-09 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an ongoing activities program to support residents in their choice of group, individual, and independent activities to meet the interests of and support the well-being of each resident as evidenced by a lack of engaging activities both in and out of resident rooms for 4 of 24 sampled residents (Residents #82, #3, #73, and #23). Findings include: 1. During an interview on 5/6/2024 at 1:30 PM Resident #82 stated that s/he wished that there were more activities for the residents. S/he is able to socialize and participate in independent activities but many cannot. S/he said that the some days there is not much going on and it is starting to get to some of the residents. Per observation on 5/6/2024 at 11:10 AM there were 8 residents sitting in the sunroom with the television on. The Medical Records Specialist was in the room talking with the residents. Resident #3 was asking what crafts were happening and if there was going to be someone there who knew what they were doing with the crafts. The Medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-09 · tag F0711 — patternEnsure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that physicians and other providers (as delegated to per regulation) review the Residents' total program of care, including medications and treatments, at each visit as required for 6 of 24 sampled residents (Residents #2, #78, #23, #19, #47, #53). Findings include: 1. Per record review, Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Per review of physician/provider notes from June 2023 through the survey date, there are no provider visit notes during this timeframe that meet the definition of a total program of care review, including a review of all current medications, treatments, and all aspects of the resident's comprehensive plan of care. 2. Per record review, Resident #78 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Per review of physician/provider notes from June 2023 through the survey date, there are no provider visit notes during this timeframe that meet the definition of a total program of care review, including a review of all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-09 · tag F0712 — patternEnsure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents are seen by a physician personally, face-to-face, for regulatory visits for 1 of 24 sampled residents (Resident #23), and failed to ensure that regulatory visits were conducted every 30 days for the first 90 days after admission for 1 of 24 sampled residents (Resident #31). The facility also did not have a system in place to track required regulatory visits for any resident. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #23's Attending Physician regulatory visit dated 12/20/2023 states Patient was not seen but was discussed with [the Nurse Practitioner]. The note explains that there were no vitals signs taken and no physical exam completed for this visit. Per interview 5/08/24 at 3:53 PM, the Director of Nursing confirmed that the above visit would not meet regulatory requirements because it was not in person. 2. The facility did not have a system in place to track regulatory visits as evidenced by the following interviews. Per…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-09 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the attending physician documents in the Resident medical record any rationale against, or actions taken as a result of, irregularities identified by the Pharmacist during the monthly medication regimen review for 4 of 5 sampled Residents (Residents #2, #71, #23, and #19). Findings include: 1. Per record review, a pharmacist medication regimen review note from December of 2023 recommends that the physician consider reducing or eliminating Resident #2's Ambien (a sleeping medication) dose due to resident #2's recent falls and the possibility that Ambien could increase fall risk. The physician checked the box disagree. There is no rationale that can be located in the medical record for Resident #2 explaining why the physician did not want to change the Ambien order. Per interview on 5/8/24 at approximately 11:30 AM, the Unit Manager confirmed that there is no evidence of a physician rationale for not wanting to change Resident #2's Ambien order in response to the pharmacist's recommendation. 2. Per record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-09 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that Residents taking psychotropic medications receive gradual dose reductions, unless contraindicated, for 3 of 5 sampled Residents (Residents #2, #25, #19). Findings include: 1. Per record review, Resident #2 is receiving Venlafaxine Extended Release Tablets 150 mg in the morning and 37.5 mg before bed every day. This dosing has been consistent for Resident #2 over the last year. Per review of pharmacist monthly MRRs (Medication Regimen Reviews) for the past year, there is no evidence that a GDR (gradual dose reduction) for Venlafaxine was ever discussed. There is also no documentation from Resident #2's Provider regarding any contraindications for attempting a GDR for Venlafaxine. Per interview on 5/8/24 at approximately 11:30 AM, the Unit Manager confirmed there is no evidence of any consideration of a GDR of Venlafaxine for Resident #2 in the last year, and stated that the facility doesn't generally consider doing GDRs for antidepressants. Per interview on 5/9/24 at approximately 12:15 PM, a pharmacist…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that records are complete, accurately documented, readily accessible, and systematically organized related to physician notes for 2 of 27 sampled residents (Residents #23 and #31). Findings include: 1. Per review of Resident #23's medical record, the following provider visits were missing from the resident's medical record: -A 11/30/23 Hematology progress note revealing that Resident #23 is to continue his/her anticoagulant, Lovenox, daily. The physician order for the anticoagulant enoxaparin sodium (Lovenox) ended on 12/14/24 and a new order was never placed. A 2/2/24 nursing note reveals that hematology should be restarted on Lovenox. See F760 for more information. -A 12/21/2023 Emergency Department provider note, revealing that Resident #23 was being seen related to an accidental or unintentional opiate overdose that the facility just started to administer. This information is not addressed in any other facility nursing note or facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-09 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation of resident needs for 1 of 24 residents in a standard survey sample (Resident #53). Findings include: Interview on 5/6/24 at approximately 2:35 PM, Resident #53, who was laying in their bed was asked about call bell access and staff response time. S/he stated, That's laughable, staff never make sure I have my call bell. Do you see it anywhere? Observation on 5/6/24 at approximately 2:37 PM revealed Resident #53 with no access to the call bell system. Upon the residents bedside table was a white coiled call bell cord which was not within Resident #53's reach. At the same time as this observation, the LPN assigned to resident #53 had been assisting Resident #53's roommate and had heard the conversation between Resident #53 and the surveyor. The LPN located the residents call bell on their bedside table and attempted to provide it to the resident. S/he stated, I have clipped it [call bell] to your pillow case. The surveyor asked the resident if they could reach the call…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan that addressed anticoagulant use for 1 of 4 sampled residents reviewed for anticoagulant use (Resident #23). Findings include: Per record review Resident #23 was admitted on [DATE] for rehabilitation following a hospital stay related to a urinary tract infection and sepsis. S/He has diagnoses that include heart failure, chronic pulmonary embolism (a blood clot that forms a blockage in the artery of the lung), and pacemaker. A 10/30/23 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS; a comprehensive assessment used as a care-planning tool) reveals that Resident #23 was admitted taking an anticoagulant. admission orders reveal a physician order for enoxaparin [Lovenox; an anticoagulant, used to prevent and treat blood clots] 120 mg/0.8 mL injection, inject 120 mg into the skin for 90 days. Review of Resident #23's care plan reveals that Resident #23 did not a have a care plan that addressed the use of anticoagulants until 4/18/24. Per…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents with Peripheral IVs receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for the only resident in the facility with a Peripheral IV (Resident #2). Findings include: Per observation on 5/6/24 at approximately 4:00 PM, Resident #2 was observed with a peripheral IV in their left arm. A date of 5/3/24 was written on the IV dressing. Per record review, Resident #2 was ordered for Cefepime HCl (an antibiotic) Intravenous Solution 1 GM/50ML Use 1 gram intravenously two times a day for an infection on 5/2/24. There is also orders for Normal Saline Flush Intravenous Solution 0.9 % Use 10 ml intravenously two times a day for both pre and post-antibiotic administration, ordered on 5/3/24. There are no orders for peripheral IV monitoring or dressing changes. Per care plan review, there is also no care plan focus for Resident #2's peripheral IV Per review of the facility policy titled Peripheral IV Dressing Changes states under the General Guidelines section the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-09 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that 1 of 24 applicable residents (Resident #23) remained free from unnecessary medications. Findings include: Per record review, Resident #23 has a physician order for Morphine Sulfate (Concentrate) Oral Solution 20 MG/ML (Morphine Sulfate) Give 0.1 ml by mouth every 4 hours for pain, [shortness of breath]. This dosing and frequency has been consistent for Resident #23 since it was first ordered on 1/9/24 and Resident #23's Medication Administration Record reveals that the morphine has been administered as ordered since 1/9/24. Per record review, a pharmacist medication regimen review note for Resident #26 from May of 2024 recommends currently receiving Morphine 6 times daily. Please evaluate continued need, consider trial taper to 4 times daily, if appropriate. The provider checked the box disagree. There is no rationale that can be located in the medical record for Resident #26 explaining why the physician did not want to change the Morphine order. Review of Resident #23's vitals, Resident #23 has not reported…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-09 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 24 sampled resident (Resident #23) are free from significant medication errors. Findings include: Per record review Resident #23 was admitted on [DATE] for rehabilitation following a hospital stay related to a urinary tract infection and sepsis. S/He has diagnoses that include heart failure, pacemaker, chronic pulmonary embolism (a blood clot that forms a blockage in the artery of the lung), and lung cancer. Per interview on 5/07/24 at 9:26 AM, Resident #23's Representative explained that s/he was concerned that Resident #23 did not receive his/her anticoagulant for weeks, around the time when Resident #23 had a significant decline in his/her health. S/He explained that Resident #23 had been seeing a hematologist who had been treating his/her history of blood clots with anticoagulants for a long time. The Representative stated that no one had alerted him/her to the discontinuation of the anticoagulant and s/he became aware that Resident #23…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2024-05-09 · tag F0848 — patternProvide a neutral and fair arbitration process and agree to arbitrator and venue.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that binding arbitration agreements provide for the selection of a neutral arbitrator and a location convenient to both parties for 2 of 3 sampled Residents (Residents #67 and 41). Findings include: 1. Per record review, Resident #67 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The signed binding arbitration agreement in Resident #67's chart was signed by the Resident's Representative on admission to the facility. The agreement contains the following language: All Arbitrations shall be administered by ADR Options, Inc. in accordance with the ADR Operations Rules of Procedure.Arbitration proceedings will be conducted at a local site either at the facility or a site selected by the Facility within ten miles of the facility. 2. Per record review, Resident #41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The signed binding arbitration agreement in Resident #41's chart was signed by the Resident's Representative on 3/9/23. The agreement contains the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$142,045 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $97,585 — penalty dated 2025-11-13
- $44,460 — penalty dated 2024-05-09
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to PRIORITY HEALTHCARE GROUP — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 3.0 | -2.0 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.8 | -1.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 1 of 5 | 3.0 | -2.0 vs chain |
The other 11 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.0★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FAIR OAKS FAMILY HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 25% | since 01/28/2020 |
| SAMARA HOLDINGS COMPANY LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 25% | since 12/29/2020 |
| GAMZEH, DAVID | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 25% | since 03/01/2016 |
| CLINICAL CONSULTING SERVICES LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2019 |
| PRIORITY CARE GROUP LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 01/01/2019 |
| SUMMATION FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2019 |
| MOXLEY, AMANDA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/15/2025 |
| VAN DYCK, ALEXANDRA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2022 |
| GLATZER, AKIVA | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/14/2025 |
| GREATOREX, TINA | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/14/2025 |
| SCHIOWITZ, MARC | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/14/2025 |
| BARRE GARDENS HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2016 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $484K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in VT
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Vermont Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 475037. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-06-17, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.