Gardens At Millville, The
48 Haven Lane, Millville, PA 17846 · For profit - Corporation · 110 certified beds · (570) 458-5566 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Feb 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (48) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $25,275 in federal fines (most recent 2024-01-12)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 26.0% | 16.8% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.0% | 6.2% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.9% | 0.7% | 0.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 9.2% | 1.5% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 10.8% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 1.6% | 0.2% | 0.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.2% | 3.1% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 20.4% | 17.0% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 27.9% | 20.0% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 93.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.9% | 4.8% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 23.7% | 25.5% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 24.4% | 17.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 3.6% | 1.4% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 90.4% | 68.7% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 21.2% | 22.5% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 10.5% | 9.5% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 3.45 | 1.62 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.44 | 1.18 | 1.80 | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
50.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 28 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 60.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 30 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 47% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 23% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 50.2%CMS range 37.1–68.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.2%CMS range 7.5–16.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 60.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 43.3% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 50.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 97.4% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.3%CMS range 3.3–11.9 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.84 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 110 beds and averages 101.6 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.23 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.50 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.86 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.90 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.37 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.58 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
48 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 36 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-04-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and water temperature logs, observations, and resident and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an environment free of potential accident hazards by failing to maintain hot water temperatures within a safe range for residents, including Resident 12, 13, and 69, residing on the [NAME] Hall A and B unit, placing these 27 residents out of 97 residents residing in the facility in immediate jeopardy due to the potential for serious burns. Findings include: According to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, most adults will suffer third-degree burns if exposed to 150 degree water for two seconds. Burns will also occur with a six-second exposure to 140 F degree water or with a thirty second exposure to 130 degree water. Even if the temperature is 120 F degrees, a five-minute exposure could result in third-degree burns. Observation on the A unit, April 10, 2024, at 9:04 AM revealed that the temperature of the hot water in the bathroom sink…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-10-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, select facility policy, facility investigative documentation, and staff and resident interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure necessary assistance with activities of daily living and supervision were provided to prevent an accident that resulted in a major head injury resulting in harm for one of ten sampled residents (Resident 1).Findings include: A review of facility policy entitled Fall Management System last reviewed [DATE] revealed, it is the facility policy to provide appropriate evaluations and interventions to prevent falls and minimize complications if a fall occurs. Closed clinical record review for Resident CR1 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including dementia (a progressive disorder causing memory loss and impaired judgment), muscle weakness (loss of muscle strength), hypertension (high blood pressure), and a history of falling (previous episodes of losing balance). An admission Minimum Data Set…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-06-09 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespreadProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility's meal service schedule, it was determined the facility failed to consistently maintain sufficient staffing in the dietary department to effectively and efficiently carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service department. This failure resulted in delayed meal service for all the residents in the B wing unit, C wing unit, D wing unit, and the main dining room.Findings include:A review of grievances revealed a grievance filed at the facility dated May 21, 2026, which indicated on May 21, 2026, Resident CR1 reported their dinner was delivered late around 7:00 PM and stated this had been occurring regularly.Interviews with nursing staff conducted on June 9, 2026, at 8:35 AM, revealed staff reported the meal carts were consistently delivered late to the nursing units. Staff requested anonymity.A document titled Meal Delivery Times revealed the breakfast trays were expected to arrive on the B-wing unit at 7:55 AM and the main dining room at 8:00 AM.Observation of breakfast meal service on June 9, 2026,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-06-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of select facility policy, observation, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to store, label, date, and maintain food in a sanitary manner to prevent contamination and the potential for microbial growth, placing residents at risk for food-borne illness in the food and nutrition services department. Findings include: Food safety and inspection standards for safe food handling indicate that everything that comes in contact with food must be kept clean and food that is mishandled can lead to foodborne illness. Safe steps in food handling, cooking, and storage are essential in preventing foodborne illness. You cannot always see, smell, or taste harmful bacteria that may cause illness according to the USDA (The United States Department of Agriculture, also known as the Agriculture Department, is the U.S. federal executive department responsible for developing and executing federal laws related to food). Review of the facility policy titled General Food Preparation and Handling last reviewed by the facility on November 6, 2025, revealed that food…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to maintain acceptable practices for the storage and service of food to prevent the potential for contamination and microbial growth in food, which increased the risk of food-borne illness in the food and nutrition services department.Findings include:Food safety and inspection standards for safe food handling indicate that everything that comes in contact with food must be kept clean and food that is mishandled can lead to foodborne illness. Safe steps in food handling, cooking, and storage are essential in preventing foodborne illness. You cannot always see, smell, or taste harmful bacteria that may cause illness according to the USDA (The United States Department of Agriculture, also known as the Agriculture Department, is the U.S. federal executive department responsible for developing and executing federal laws related to food).Review of the food and nutrition services department's Hand Washing Policy last reviewed November 6, 2025, indicated that staff will wash hands frequently as needed during…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, select facility policy, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident's medication regimen was free from unnecessary psychotropic medications and that non-pharmacological interventions and informed consent were implemented prior to initiation of an antipsychotic medication for one of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident 74).Findings included: A review of the facility policy titled Psychotropic Medication Use, last reviewed by the facility on November 6, 2025, revealed it is the facility's policy that residents do not receive psychotropic medications that are not clinically indicated and necessary to treat a specific condition documented in the medical record. Psychotropic medication management is an interdisciplinary process that involves the resident, family, and representative and includes determining adequate indications for use, establishing appropriate dose and duration, and determining appropriateness of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set Assessments (MDS, a federally mandated standardized assessment conducted at specific intervals to plan resident care) accurately reflected the status of two residents out of 25 sampled (Residents 8 and 88).Findings included: A review of Resident 8's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included dementia (a condition characterized by progressive or persistent loss of intellectual functioning, especially with impairment of memory and abstract thinking, and often with personality change, resulting from disease of the brain) and anxiety. A physician order dated November 9, 2025, noted an order for Ativan (an antianxiety medication) 0.5 mg by mouth every 6 hours as needed for anxiety. A review of Resident 8's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], Section N0415 indicated the resident did…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, a review of clinical records, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide person-centered care by failing to follow physician's orders for the consistent application of a prescribed therapeutic measure, compression stockings, for one resident of 25 sampled (Resident 88).Findings include: A review of Resident 88's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included heart failure (a condition in which the heart doesn't pump blood as well as it should) and hypertension (blood pressure that is higher than normal). A review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS, a federally mandated standardized assessment process conducted periodically to plan resident care) dated November 19, 2025, revealed that Resident 88 had moderately impaired cognition with a BIMS score of 12 (Brief Interview for Mental Status, a tool within the Cognitive Section of the MDS that is used to assess the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized person-centered plan to provide trauma informed care to a resident with a diagnosis of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder for one out of 25 residents reviewed (Resident 10).Findings include:A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD, a mental health condition that can develop after someone experiences or witnesses a traumatic event such as violence, accidents, natural disasters, war, or abuse), depression, and anxiety. The resident's current care plan, in effect at the time of review beginning December 3, 2025, did not identify the resident's PTSD symptoms or triggers related to this diagnosis and did not identify resident specific interventions to meet the resident's needs for minimizing triggers and/or re-traumatization.Interview with the Nursing Home…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, review of select facility policy and clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to adhere to acceptable storage and labeling for multi-dose medications in one of four medication carts observed (A-Hall medication cart). Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Medication Labeling and Storage last reviewed by the facility November 6, 2025, indicated that multi-use vials that have been opened or accessed (e.g. needle punctured) are dated and discarded within 28 days unless the manufacturer specifies a shorter or longer date for the open vial. An observation of the A-Hall medication cart on December 4, 2025, at 9:10 AM, in the presence of Employee 4, licensed practical nurse (LPN), of medication stored in the medication cart, revealed a multi-dose pen of Aspart Insulin (a rapid-acting insulin medication used to lower blood sugar) opened on August 28, 2025. Further observations revealed a Lispro multi-dose pen (a rapid-acting insulin medication used to lower blood sugar) that had been opened and available for use but…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — isolatedHave policies on smoking.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, a review of clinical records and select facility policy, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to implement procedures for smoking safety and safety of smoking areas, as evidenced by one out of the 25 residents (Resident 22).Findings include:A review of the facility policy titled Tobacco Policy, last reviewed by the facility on November 6, 2025, revealed it is the policy of the facility to promote safety as well as a healthful work and living space. The policy indicates that all resident smoking will be under supervision, during scheduled smoking times, and in the designated smoking area. Also, the policy indicates that smoking may be suspended temporarily for inclement weather such as temperatures below freezing and high winds.A clinical record review revealed Resident 22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that include dementia (a condition characterized by the loss of cognitive functioning such as thinking, remembering, and reasoning, to such an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-10-15 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of controlled drug records and select facility policy and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to implement pharmacy procedures for reconciling controlled drugs and records accounting for their administration for two of 10 residents sampled (Resident 2 and 3). Findings include: A review of the facility's Medication Administration policy reviewed November 2024 revealed that medications are prepared only by licensed nursing staff, medical staff, pharmacy or other personnel authorized by state laws and regulations to prepare medications. Prior to administration, the medication and dosage schedule on the resident's medication administration record (MAR) is compared with the medication label. Administration of the medication is documented immediately after it is given.Clinical record review revealed Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of dementia (a progressive disorder causing memory loss and impaired judgment), anxiety and mood disorder. A quarterly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 36 citations
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
acceptable practices for the storage and service of food to prevent the potential for contamination and microbial growth in food, which increased the risk of food-borne illness. Findings include: Food safety and inspection standards for safe food handling indicate that everything that comes in contact with food must be kept clean and food that is mishandled can lead to foodborne illness. Safe steps in food handling, cooking, and storage are essential in preventing foodborne illness. You cannot always see, smell, or taste harmful bacteria that may cause illness according to the USDA (The United States Department of Agriculture, also known as the Agriculture Department, is the U.S. federal executive department responsible for developing and executing federal laws related to food). Observation during the initial tour of the food and nutrition services department with the foodservice director (FSD) conducted on February 11, 2025, at 9:20 AM, revealed the following unsanitary practices with the potential to introduce contaminants into food and increase the potential for food-borne…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, select facility investigative reports, select facility policies, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide meal tray set-up assistance to ensure food was cut in bite size pieces to promote safe swallowing for one of 23 residents sampled (Resident 76). Findings include: Review of the facility Assistance with Meals Policy dated November 1, 2024, indicated that residents shall receive assistance with meals in a manner that meets the individual needs of each resident. All residents will be encouraged to eat in the dining room. Facility staff will serve resident trays and will help residents who require assistance with eating. Review of the facility LifeVac Policy (non-powered, non-invasive, single use only airway clearing device developed for resuscitating a victim with an airway obstruction) dated November 1, 2024, indicated the LifeVac can be utilized when traditional basic life-saving methods, such as the Heimlich maneuver (first-aid technique…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-14 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, review of clinical records and the facility's activity calendar, and interviews with staff, it was determined the facility failed to provide an individualized activities program designed to meet the specific functional needs, abilities, and preferences for residents with dementia and/or sensory deficits for five residents (Residents 15, 46, 96, 65, and 51) out of 23 sampled residents. Findings include: On February 13, 2025, at 10:35 AM, an observation was conducted in the day room across from the C/D nurses' station. Five residents (Residents 15, 46, 96, 65, and 51) were seated in the room. The television was on; however, none of the residents appeared to be watching or engaged with the program. No staff member was present, and none of the residents were conversing or otherwise engaged in meaningful activities. According to the February 2025 activities calendar, a scheduled Ladies Group was taking place in the main dining room; however, the female residents in the day room were not participating in the scheduled activity. A review of Resident 15's clinical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-14 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, review of select facility policy, test tray results, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to serve meals that were palatable and at a safe and appetizing temperature for 7 out of 23 residents sampled (Residents 44, 201, 38, 16, 88, 54 and 34). Findings include: According to the federal regulatory guidance at 483.60(i)-(2) Food safety requirements - the definition of Danger Zone, found under the Definitions section, is food temperatures above 41 degrees Fahrenheit and below 135 degrees Fahrenheit that allow rapid growth of pathogenic microorganisms that can cause foodborne illness. Review of the facility Temperatures Policy dated November 1, 2024, indicated that all hot food items must be cooked to appropriate internal temperatures, held and served at a temperature of at least 135 degrees Fahrenheit. Take temperatures often to monitor for safe temperature ranges at or below 41 degrees Fahrenheit for cold foods and at or above 135 degrees Fahrenheit for hot foods. During a group interview with six alert and oriented residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-14 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — patternConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and review of professional literature, the facility's assessment, facility provided documentation, and review of the medical, psychiatric, and mental health conditions of the resident census, it was determined the facility failed to conduct and document a facility-wide assessment, using evidence-based methods, which identified the specific resources necessary to care for its specific resident population. Findings include: Review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Memorandum, Revised Guidance for Long-Term Care Facility Assessment Requirements (QSO-24-13-NH) dated June 18, 2024, revealed the facility assessment must include an evaluation of diseases, conditions, physical or cognitive limitations of the resident population, acuity (the level of severity of residents' illnesses, physical, mental, and cognitive limitations, and conditions) and any other pertinent information about the resident population as a whole that may affect the services the facility must provide. Continued review revealed, the assessment of the resident population should…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, review of select facility policy, the facility's infection control log and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to maintain and implement a comprehensive program to monitor and prevent infections in the facility and further failed to ensure that staff followed proper infection control techniques while passing medications to three of three residents (Residents 6, 22, and 32) on the A Hall nursing unit. Findings included: A review of facility policy titled Infection Prevention and Control Program last reviewed by the facility on November 1, 2024, indicated the Infection Prevention and Control Program (IPCP) is established and maintained to provide safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. The elements of the IPCP consist of coordination/oversight, policies/procedures, surveillance, data analysis, antibiotic stewardship, outbreak management, prevention of infection, and employee health and safety. An observation on February 12, 2025, at 8:22 AM revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of the facility's abuse prohibition policy, clinical records, select investigative reports and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to assure that one resident (Resident 40) was free from physical abuse perpetrated by another resident (Resident 81) out of 23 sampled residents. Findings include: A review of facility policy titled Abuse Policy, last reviewed by the facility on November 1, 2024, revealed it is the policy of the facility to not tolerate abuse, neglect, mistreatment, exploitation of residents, or misappropriation of resident property by anyone. The policy defines abuse as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish. Willful, as used in this definition of abuse, means the individual must have acted deliberately, not that the individual must have intended to inflict injury or harm. A review of Resident 40's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-14 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, select facility policy, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a physician-ordered fluid restriction was maintained for one resident receiving dialysis (Resident 13) out of 23 sampled. Findings include: A review of a facility policy titled Encouraging and Restricting Fluids last reviewed by the facility on November 1, 2024, revealed the purpose of this procedure is to provide the resident with the amount of fluids necessary to maintain optimum health. This may include encouraging or restricting fluids. The policy stated, Verify that there is a physician's order for this procedure and review the resident's care plan and/or assignment sheets to assess for any special needs of the resident. The procedure stated to follow the specific amount of fluids ordered by the physician concerning for fluid intake or restrictions. A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-14 · tag F0810 — isolatedProvide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide adaptive dining equipment as required and prescribed for one resident out of 23 sampled (Resident 46). Findings include: A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include early onset Alzheimer's disease (a progressive brain disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions), and cerebrovascular disease (or stroke - when blood flow to a part of your brain is stopped either by a blockage or the rupture of a blood vessel). Review of Resident 46's plan of care dated November 17, 2021, indicated that the resident had a nutritional problem or a potential nutritional problem due to gastroesophageal reflux (a chronic digestive disease where the liquid content of the stomach refluxes into the esophagus, the tube connecting the mouth and stomach. Foods containing tomato, such as spaghetti sauce, salsa, or pizza, spicy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services to maintain a clean and safe resident environment in two units out of four units observed. (A and C units) Findings include: An observation on August 27, 2024, at approximately 9:50 AM of the A hall nursing unit revealed the following: room [ROOM NUMBER] was noted to have a plastic three drawer bin covered with dried brown spots. The bathroom in this room had a plastic garbage bag tied to the grab bar by the toilet containing a soiled urinal with urine collected in the bottom of the plastic garbage bag. Another plastic garbage bag tied to the grab bar by the toilet contained a soiled foley catheter bag (urine drainage bag) with a brown substance observed in the bag. A toilet brush encrusted with a yellow substance was present in a plastic container once used for cottage cheese, on the floor in the bathroom. room [ROOM NUMBER] was noted to have a plastic garbage bag tied to the grab…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a clean and comfortable environment for residents. Findings include: Observations of resident room [ROOM NUMBER] during an environmental tour of the facility on May 21, 2024, at 10 AM revealed the floor surrounding and beneath the resident's bed was littered with dirt, paper debris and a brown sticky substance. Observation of resident room [ROOM NUMBER] D, revealed a large amount of dirt, paper debris and a brown sticky substance on the floor, under the bed and around the bedside table. The hot water temperature in the 200 hallway resident shower room on May 21, 2024 at 10 AM was 100 degrees Farenheit. The hot water temperatures in the locked dementia care unit shower room was only 98 degrees Farenheit. The hot water temperatures in the 100 hallway shower rooms May 21, 2024, at 10 A.M. ranged from 90 degrees and 98 degrees Farenheit. The facility failed to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, select facility policy and investigative reports and staff and resident interviews it was determined that the facility failed to consistently implement sufficient measures to protect a resident (Resident A3 ) out of 16 sampled from sexual verbal abuse perpetrated by another resident (Resident A2 ). Findings included: A review of a facility policy for Abuse last reviewed by the facility on June 21, 2023, indicated that residents have the right to be free from verbal, sexual, physical, and mental abuse, corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, neglect, and misappropriation of property. Residents must not be subjected to abuse by anyone including but not limited to facility staff, other residents, consultants, or volunteers, staff of other agencies serving the resident, family members or legal guardians friends or other individuals. Clinical record review revealed that Resident A2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis to include dementia, alcohol abuse with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an environment free from accident hazards on one of two resident hallways. Findings include: Observations of the east hallway May 21, 2024 at 9 AM, 11 AM. and again at 1 PM on the upper end of the 100 hallway revealed 7 wheelchairs. a straight back chair, a large linen cart, dirty linen carts, a trash bin and a wheelchair charger plugged into a hallway outlet lining the left side of the hallway, obstructing access to the handrails on the wall on that side of the corridor. Observations of the east hallway, May 21, 2024, at 9:10 AM and again at 1:10 PM on the lower end of the 100 hallway revealed 5 wheelchairs, a large linen cart, trash container and a double dirty linen cart, lining the left side of the hallway, obstructing access to the handrails on the wall on that side of the corridor. Residents were observed to be out and about on the unit at those times, self-propelling in wheelchairs and/or ambulating with walkers. During an interview May 21, 2024 at 2 P.M.,the Nursing Home…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-21 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, review of select facility policy and clinical records and staff and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to determine a resident's capability to self-administer medication for one of 16 residents reviewed (Resident B1). Findings include: A review of facility policy titled Administering Medications, provided by the facility on May 21, 2024, indicated it is the policy that medications shall be administered to in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. Residents may self-administer their own medications only if the attending physician, in conjunction with the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) had determined that they have the decision-making capacity to do so safely. A review of the facility policy titled Self-Administration of Medications, provided by the facility on May 21, 2024, indicated it is the policy to promote the right of the resident to self-administer medications if the interdisciplinary team has determined that it is clinically appropriate and safe. The staff and practitioner will assess each resident's mental and physical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain infection control practices to prevent the spread of infection including for one of 16 sampled residents (Resident A1). Findings include: Observations on May 21, 2024 at 9 AM, 11 AM and 1 PM revealed Resident A1 was his bed, and upon each observation his urinary foley catheter collection bag was observed directly on the floor. The collection bag was not in a privacy bag at the time of these observations. There were multiple uncovered, clean dressings, a opened box of clean dressings an open tube of Hydrocortisone cream (with the cap off), an open tube of Triamcinolone ( a topical steroid cream) with the cap off and an open bottle of sodium chloride solution (used for irrigation) with no open date on the bedside table in Resident A1's room. On top of these resident care and treatment supplies was an uncovered, clean incontinence brief. On the resident's dresser was a wash basin containing multiple used hand towels,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain acceptable practices for the storage and service of food to prevent the potential for contamination and microbial growth in food, which increased the risk of food-borne illness in the dietary department, and Alzheimer's dementia care unit kitchenette/pantry area, and East and [NAME] medication rooms. Findings include: Food safety and inspection standards for safe food handling indicate that everything that comes in contact with food must be kept clean and food that is mishandled can lead to foodborne illness. Safe steps in food handling, cooking, and storage are essential in preventing foodborne illness. You cannot always see, smell, or taste harmful bacteria that may cause illness according to the USDA (The United States Department of Agriculture, also known as the Agriculture Department, is the U.S. federal executive department responsible for developing and executing federal laws related to food). A review of a facility policies entitled Storage Areas and Handling Clean Equipment and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records, the facility's infection control data, and infection control program and policies and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a comprehensive program to monitor and prevent infections in the facility. Findings include: A review of the facility's current infection control policy provided during the survey ending April 12, 2024, revealed that it is the purpose of the facility Infection Prevention and Control Program is to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections and to improve antibiotic use. The facility adheres to the mission and goals set forth in the infection control plan. A review of the facility's compiled infection data since the last standard survey ending May 12, 2023, revealed that during the months from August 2023 through March 2024 multiple resident infections were identified each month. However, there was no documented evidence that the infection preventionist/designee had evaluated potential causative…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide housekeeping services to maintain a clean and orderly environment on four of the four nursing units (Nursing [NAME] A, [NAME] B, East C, and East D Hall). Findings include: An observation on April 9, 2024, at 10:24 AM revealed the window blinds in resident room [ROOM NUMBER] were broken or missing slats. Pieces of the slats were observed on the floor of the resident's room. A film of dust, black debris, and white paint chips were observed on the window sill. A build-up of dust and debris was observed on the radiator cover extending along the floor on the window-side wall. An observation on April 9, 2024, at 11:15 AM in the [NAME] A Hall exit, near resident rooms [ROOM NUMBERS],2 revealed a black substance debris on the floor to the left of the exit doors. The bottom corner of the exit door was observed to have a dirt buildup of approximately 0.25 inches thick. An observation on April 9, 2024, at 12:02 PM in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-12 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — patternProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide restorative nursing services planned to maintain the mobility and functional abilities of one of the 20 residents sampled (Resident 16). Findings included: A clinical record review revealed that Resident 16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included end-stage renal disease (final stage of kidney decline where the kidneys are no longer able to function to meet the body's needs). A review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS - a federally mandated standardized assessment process conducted periodically to plan resident care) dated February 28, 2024, revealed that Resident 16 is cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 15 (Brief Interview for Mental Status- a tool within the Cognitive Section of the MDS that is used to assess the resident's attention, orientation, and ability to register and recall new information; a score of 13-15 indicates cognition is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of controlled drug records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement pharmacy procedures for reconciling controlled drugs and records accounting for their administration for one of 20 residents sampled (Resident 36) . Finding include: A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 36 had a physician order dated January 18, 2024, for Oxycodone (a narcotic opioid pain medication) 10 mg Tablet, one tablet every 6 hours as needed for severe pain 7-10 (a pain scale, 1-10, 1 least pain, 10 most pain). A review of the controlled substance record accounting for the above narcotic medication revealed that on April 1, 2024, at 12:00 AM, April 1, 2024 at 11:45 AM, April 2, 2024, at 8:30 PM, April 4, 2024 at 11:40 PM, April 5, 2024 at 5:30 PM, April 6, 2024, at 5:30 AM, April 7, 2024, at 5:37 AM, April 8, 2024, at 11:30 AM, and April 8, 2024, at 12:30 PM, nursing staff signed out a dose of the resident's supply of Oxycodone 10 mg . However, the administration of the controlled drug to the resident was not recorded on the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-12 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, a review of facility's planned menus and resident and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to serve menus that accommodated, to the extent possible, the food preferences of the resident population, to promote acceptance and satisfaction with meals, including three residents of 20 residents reviewed (Resident 69, 80, and 91). Findings included: During an interview with Resident 69 on April 9, 2024, at 1:00 p.m., the resident stated that that the food served lacks flavor and the facility menu lacks variety. He reported that he regularly attends food committee meetings and voices his concerns regarding the lack of a varied menu, such as repetitive menu options. Resident 69 stated that the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) was very understanding and did a good job, but he feels that her hands are tied due to budgetary restraints from the facility's corporate staff. Resident 69 stated that the facility's CDM and Registered Dietitian (RD) weren't involved in the development of the menu and that the corporate dietitian develops the menu for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-12 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — patternAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews and a review of clinical records and water temperature logs it was determined that the facility was not administered in a manner to effectively use its resources to promote safety and physical well-being of residents by failing to ensure safe hot water temperatures on the [NAME] Hall A and B unit. Findings included: A review of clinical records and water temperature logs, observations, and resident and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an environment free of potential accident hazards by failing to maintain hot water temperatures within a safe range for residents, including Resident 12, 13, and 69, residing on the [NAME] Hall A and B unit, placing these 27 residents out of 97 residents residing in the facility in immediate jeopardy due to the potential for serious burns. According to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, most adults will suffer third-degree burns if exposed to 150 degree water for two seconds. Burns…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-12 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — patternConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interviews and a review of documentation provided by the facility, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct a facility wide assessment that accurately reflected the personnel and specific resources presently available and to identify those that are necessary to care for its current resident population. Findings include: At the time of the survey ending April 12, 2024, the facility had reviewed its facility assessment on June 3, 2023, to determine the specific and unique needs of its resident population and the available and accessible resources to meet these needs on a daily basis and during emergent situations. The facility provided a facility assessment tool to the survey team on April 11, 2024. There was no documentation on the form that identified and addressed the needs of the locked B unit, Dementia/Memory care unit. The form did not include any focus on the care and needs of the 48 residents with documented diagnosis of Dementia/Alzheimers disease, including the 27 residents residing on the locked dementia unit. There was no addressed dementia care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-12 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and select facility policies and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to thoroughly investigate injuries of unknown origin, bruising, to rule out abuse, neglect or mistreatment as the potential cause for one out of 20 sampled residents (Resident 90). Findings included: A review of the facility's policy Abuse Policy that was last reviewed by the facility on June 21, 2023, indicated that a timely and thorough investigations of all reports and allegations of abuse to include injuries of unknown origin. An alleged violation of abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment (including injuries of unknown sources, misappropriation of resident property) and reasonable suspicion of a crime resulting in bodily injury will be reported immediately, but not later than two (2) hours if the alleged violation involves abuse OR has resulted in serious bodily injury; or twenty-four (24) if the alleged does not involve abuse AND has not resulted in serious bodily injury.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-12 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to include, in the resident's baseline plan of care, minimum standards of care to fully address the resident's immediate needs upon admission for one resident out 20 sampled (Resident 299). Findings include: Review of Resident 299's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include ischemic cardiomyopathy (the hearts decreased ability to pump blood properly due to heart damage), paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (an irregular, often rapid heart rate that causes poor blood flow), and the presence of an automatic implantable cardiac defibrillator (AICD- is a microcomputer that is implanted under the skin of the upper chest area. It monitors heart rate and delivers therapy in the form of small electrical pulses. An AICD is a permanent device inserted into the right ventricle and typically placed near the collarbone under the skin of the chest). There was no documented…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-12 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and select facility policy and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement individualized plans to manage residents' dementia-related behavioral symptoms to promote resident safety and the residents' highest practicable physical and mental well-being for one resident out of 20 sampled (Resident 14). Findings include: A review of facility policy titled Alzheimer/Dementia Disease, last reviewed by the facility on June 21, 2023, indicated that Dementia care requires constant adjustments. New challenges arise, meaning that a caregiver must be constantly observant to behavioral changes. A clinical record review revealed Resident 14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include Alzheimer's disease (a brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills and, eventually, the ability to carry out the simplest tasks) and unspecified psychosis (a disturbance in thought and perception disrupting a person's ability…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-12 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident's drug regimen was free of unnecessary antibiotic drugs for one out of 20 residents sampled (Resident 15). Findings included: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include dementia, chronic kidney disease stage 3 and was severely, cognitively impaired. A review of an RN Practitioner assessment of the resident dated March 15, 2024, revealed that a Chart review indicates {Resident 15} with multiple UTIs in the past, asked nursing to collect urine and dip is suspicious for UTI sent for U/A C&S (urinalysis and culture and sensitivity), initial urine appears suspicious for infection, collect U/A C&S via straight cath. The noted plan included Elevated white blood cell count, no clinical signs of infection, vital signs stable, collect U/A C&S (urinalysis and culture and sensitivity). The RN practitioner ordered a urinalysis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, a review of select facility policy and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement procedures to ensure acceptable storage and use by dates for multi-dose medications on one of two medication storage rooms (Med Room West). Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Vials and Ampules of Injectable Medications, last reviewed by the facility June 21, 2023, indicate that the purpose is to ensure medications are used in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations or the provider pharmacy directions for storage, use, and disposal. The beyond use date and initials of the first person to use the vial are recorded on the multidose vials. Medication in multidose vials may be used for twenty-eight days if inspection reveals no problems during that time. An observation of the medication room on the [NAME] Wing on April 10, 2024, at 9:05 AM, in the presence of Employee 6 (RN Supervisor), of medication stored in the medication refrigerator revealed a multi-dose bottle of Aplisol (solution used for screening for tuberculosis)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-12 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolatedSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of the statement of deficiencies from the survey ending February 15, 2024, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to develop and implement corrective action plans to prevent continued quality deficiencies related to ensuring that the facility environment was maintained in a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. Findings included: During an abbreviated complaint survey completed on February 15, 2024, deficient facility practice was identified under the requirement of safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment whereas the facility failed to provide housekeeping services to maintain a clean and orderly environment on four of four nursing units (Nursing Hall A, B, C and D). In response to the deficiency cited during the survey of February 15, 2024, the facility developed a plan of correction to include a quality assurance monitoring component to ensure that solutions were sustained. This plan was to be completed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-12 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and the facility's infection control policies and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an antibiotic stewardship program that includes a system to effectively monitor antibiotic usage as evidenced by one of 20 sampled residents (Resident 15). Findings include: A review of the facility policy for Antibiotic Stewardship, dated as reviewed June 21, 2023, revealed that the plan was designed to facilitate compliance with state and federal regulations relating to infection control and antibiotic stewardship. It is the purpose of the facility Infection Prevention and Control Program is to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections and to improve antibiotic use. The facility adheres to the mission and goals set forth in the infection control plan. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide housekeeping services to maintain a clean and orderly environment on four of four nursing units (Nursing Hall A, B, C and D). Findings include: An observation on February 15, 2024, at 11:47 AM in the resident TV room lounge revealed two dead bugs, approximately an inch in length, behind a red recliner. Cobwebs, dust, and debris were observed on the floor near the bugs. Multiple white stains and discolorations were observed on the arm rest and seat cushion. Dust, debris, peeling paint, and black scuff marks extending the length of the heating unit. [NAME] stains were observed on wall below the center window. An observation on February 15, 2024, at 12:08 PM in the C Hall shower room revealed small live black ants on the floor. A bathtub was observed with black pieces of debris on the base of the white tub near the drain. Hair and a rubber band were stuck in the metal strainer in the drain. Cobwebs were observed near…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-15 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — patternProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of the facility's abuse policy, select investigative reports, and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure four residents out of 11 sampled was free from misappropriation of resident property, medications (Resident 7, 9, 10, and 11). Findings included: A review of the facility policy entitled Abuse Policy revealed that the residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation. The policy noted that misappropriation is the deliberate misplacement, exploitation, or wrongful, temporary, or permanent use of a residence belongings or money without the resident's consent. A review of the clinical record review revealed that Resident 7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which include dementia (a condition characterized by progressive or persistent loss of intellectual functioning, especially with impairment of memory and abstract thinking, and often with personality change,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-15 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, a review of facility provided documents, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program, including observations made on two of the four nursing units (Nursing Halls A and C). Findings include: A review of the facility's Pest Sighting Log revealed an entry dated November 27, 2023, indicating that live ants were observed in resident room [ROOM NUMBER]. The number of ants was listed as a lot. A pest sighting entry dated December 10, 2023, indicated that residents reported killing three brown bugs in resident room [ROOM NUMBER]. A pest sighting entry dated December 14, 2023, indicated that black bugs were observed in the bathroom in resident room [ROOM NUMBER]. A review of the facility's pest control service inspection report dated December 15, 2023 revealed two services were provided, drain service and pest management. The service inspection report indicated that no conditions were added for this service and no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-12 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — patternProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of select facility policy and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized plan to meet the resident's toileting needs, including timely staff assistance with toileting and incontinence management for one out of six sampled residents (Resident A1 ). Findings include: A review of facility policy titled Urinary Continence and Incontinence - Assessment and Management revealed the staff and practitioner will appropriately screen for, and manage, individuals with urinary incontinence, manage incontinence following relevant clinical guidelines, provide appropriate services and treatment to help residents restore or improve bladder function, and prevent urinary tract infections to the extent possible. Residents will be assessed for information related to urinary incontinence with staff defining each individual's level of continence, referring to the criteria in the Minimum Data Set. Nursing staff will seek and document…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, a review of clinical records, and select incident reports and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that one resident out of six sampled were free of chemical restraints used to most readily control the resident's behavior and not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms (Resident B1). Findings include: A review of Resident B1's clinical record revealed admission to the facility on November 5, 2021, with a history of alcohol abuse, adult failure to thrive (a syndrome of decline in older adults that affects their physical, mental, and social well-being) and major depressive disorder (can be more severe than some other types of depression, requires different treatments, and shares some symptoms). A Minimum Data Set assessment (a federally mandated standardized assessment completed periodically to plan resident care) dated November 14, 2023, indicated that the resident was moderately cognitively impaired with a BIMS (brief interview to assess cognitive status) score of 12 (8 to 12 points: suggests moderate cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to fully develop and implement person-centered comprehensive care plans to meet the individualized needs of one resident out of six sampled (Resident B1). Findings included: A review of Resident B1's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a history of alcohol abuse, adult failure to thrive and major depressive disorder. A review of Resident B1's plan of care initiated May 17, 2022, for the problem of behaviors indicated that the resident had behaviors related to alteration in neurological status due to dementia with specified behaviors that included sexual behaviors, touching female resident, verbally abusive toward staff, exposing his penis dated 1/5/23, and sexually inappropriate behavior dated 1/7/23. Planned interventions to manage Resident B1's behaviors included frequent visual checks as ordered, cueing and reorientation as ordered, and to remove resident from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$25,275 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $25,275 — penalty dated 2024-01-12
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-05-10 for 42 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to PRIORITY HEALTHCARE GROUP — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 3.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 3.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
The other 11 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.0★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAYBROOK-P OPCO HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 08/15/2016 |
| BL CAPITAL GROUP HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 24% | since 01/28/2020 |
| FAIR OAKS FAMILY HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 12% | since 01/28/2020 |
| SAMARA HOLDINGS COMPANY LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 10% | since 01/28/2020 |
| STRAWBERRY HILL HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 10% | since 01/28/2020 |
| SEBBAG, GABRIEL | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 5% | since 08/15/2016 |
| CLINICAL CONSULTING SERVICES LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2019 |
| PRIORITY CARE GROUP LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 01/01/2019 |
| SUMMATION FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2019 |
| PEARLSTEIN, ROBERT | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2021 |
| URBAN, VINCENT | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/06/2025 |
| MAYBROOK-P MILLVILLE PROPCO LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/15/2016 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 91% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in PA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395872. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.