No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Silver Pines Nursing And Rehabilitation Center

503 Old Austin Highway, Bastrop, TX 78602 · Non profit - Corporation · 114 certified beds · (512) 321-6220 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (512) 321-6220 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Nov 2023Resident-funds citation (F0565)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Nov 2023
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (31) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Urgent care / clinic
441 TX-71 W · (512) 581-5016 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
504 Highway 71 W · (512) 321-4008 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
H-E-B<0.1 mi
104 N Hasler Blvd · (512) 321-1011 · Call to confirm hours
Park
400 Farm St · (512) 332-8920 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
489 Agnes St · (512) 782-8478

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased2.7%15.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight0.0%3.0%5.4%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.8%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%2.4%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.9%3.3%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened4.1%14.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication23.1%18.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.9%3.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control7.8%13.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table8.3%9.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%88.0%79.4%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.372.171.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.382.061.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

10.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.16U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.07hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 13% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.3%CMS range 6.8–14.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay4.8%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.6%CMS range 2.8–12.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.091.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.23
RN hours/ resident / day
0.79
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.03
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.05
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.26
RN hoursweekends
44.3%
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 114 beds and averages 86.6 residents a day — about 76% occupied, or roughly 27 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.05 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.23 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.03 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.84 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.14 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.22 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

6
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-06-05)
11
at the previous standard inspection (2024-05-23)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

31 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-05 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed, to provide an ongoing activities program to support residents in their choice of activities, both facility sponsored group and individual activities and independent activities, designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident , encouraging both independence and interaction in the community for two of five residents (Resident #7 and Resident #10 reviewed for activities. The facility failed to provide Resident #7 and Resident #10 in room activities on the dates of 05/01/2025 thru 05/13/2025. This failure could place residents at risk for boredom, depression, and diminished quality of life. Findings included: Review of Resident #7's Face sheet, dated 06/04/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis: vascular dementia, moderate, with psychotic disturbance ( problems with blood flow to the brain with psychotic symptoms such…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program, designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment, and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 3 (Resident #56,Resident #22, and Resident #293) of 5 residents reviewed for infection control practices, in that: The facility failed to: 1. Ensure CNA B changed dirty gloves when handling clean items while providing peri care to Resident #56 2. Ensure MA E sanitized blood pressure monitor in between Resident #22 and Resident #293 while obtaining blood pressure. These failures could place residents at risk for healthcare associated cross-contamination and infections. Findings included: Review of Resident #56's face sheet dated 06/04/25 reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, psychotic disturbance, mood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident that includes the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality care for one (Resident #193) of three residents reviewed for baseline care plans. The facility failed to complete a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission for Resident #193. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving care and services to meet their needs. Findings included: Review of Resident #193's Face Sheet, dated 06/04/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses of chronic diastolic heart failure (left heart ventricle is stiff and has difficulty relaxing and filling with blood between heart beats), atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery with unspecified angina pectoris (when arteries that carry blood to your heart become narrowed and blocked), paroxysmal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who needed respiratory care were provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, for 3 of 4 residents (Resident #27, Resident #74 and Resident #45) reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #27, Resident #74 and Resident #45's nebulizing mask and tubing, that were observed on 06/03/25, were bagged for sanitation when not in use. This failure could affect residents who received nebulizing treatment and place them at risk for respiratory infections. The findings included: Record review of Resident #27's face sheet dated 06/03/25 revealed a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses were dementia, behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, anxiety, hypotension, history of transient ischemic attack and cerebral infarction(stroke), shortness of breath, unsteadiness on feet and cognitive communication deficit.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure in accordance with State and Federal laws, all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments under proper temperature controls and permitted only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for 1 of 4 medication carts (200 Hall Med Aide Cart) reviewed for medication storage . The facility failed to ensure that the 200 Hall Med Aide Cart did not contain personal belongings of MA E, along with the medications for residents. This failure could place residents at risk for contamination and medication errors through confusion and distraction among the medication administration staff . Findings include: During an observation and interview on 06/04/25 at 9:35am it was revealed that the 200-hall med cart was operated by MA E. It was observed there was an orange-colored handbag at the bottom drawer of the cart that belonged to MA E. MA E immediately removed it from the drawer and placed it elsewhere. She stated she should not have placed her bag in the med cart drawer as it was against the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for one of one kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation. The facility failed to ensure Dietary [NAME] changed her gloves during food preparation after touching a bread bag and a piece of paper. This failure could place residents who ate food from the kitchen at risk for foodborne illness. Findings include: Observation on 06/04/2025 at 3:55 PM, revealed the Dietary [NAME] was wearing gloves. She touched a piece of paper with her forefinger and middle finger on her right hand. She touched outside of the bread bag with all fingers on both hands. She reached inside the bread bag and obtained 4 pieces of bread. She placed the bread in the puree processor. The Dietary [NAME] touched outside the bread bag when she obtained 8 pieces of bread. She placed the 8 pieces of bread into the puree processor. The Dietary [NAME] did not change her gloves in between tasks and continued to puree the bread. Her middle finger and fore…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide maintenance services necessary to maintain a safe, orderly, and comfortable homelike environment for five (room [ROOM NUMBER], 451, 460, 461, and 463) of twelve rooms reviewed in the facility's secure unit for environmental conditions. The facility failed to cut down and cap the two mounting bolts that secure the toilet's base to the floor, which ensures that the toilet does not move or leak in room [ROOM NUMBER], 451, 460, and 463. The facility failed to ensure that room [ROOM NUMBER]'s bathroom walls were painted after having two portions of drywall repaired. These failures could place residents at risk of living in an unsafe, unhomelike, and uncomfortable environment. Findings included: Observation on 05/21/2024 at 10:09 AM, room [ROOM NUMBER]'s bathroom toilet had the two base mounting bolts exposed, uncut, and not capped. Observation on 05/21/2024 at 10:19 AM, room [ROOM NUMBER]'s bathroom toilet had the two base mounting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-23 · tag F0645 — pattern
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure all PASARR- Level I positive residents diagnosed with mental illness were provided with a PASARR- Level II Screening for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #70) reviewed for mental illness, intellectual disability, or developmental disability. The facility failed to ensure Resident #70 received a PASARR Level 2 evaluation. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving necessary mental health services and causing a possible decline in mental health. Findings included: Record review of Resident #70's face sheet dated 05/23/24 revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage-unspecified (also known as intracranial bleed is bleeding within the skull), hemiplegia (one sided paralysis) and hemiparesis (partial weakness on one side of the body) following unspecified cerebrovascular disease (a group of conditions that affect blood flow and the blood vessels in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for one of one kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation. 1. The facility failed to properly label food and store food by not sealing/covering food items. in one of one walk in refrigerators and dry storage shelves located in the kitchen. 2. The facility failed to ensure a visitor wore a hair net and a beard guard when he entered the kitchen from the exit side door leading to the outside near parking area. These failures placed residents at risk for health complications and foodborne illnesses. Findings included: 1. Observation on 05/21/2024 at 9:02 AM reflected the following food and drinks were not covered and/or not labeled in the walk-in refrigerator: - Leftover chicken in a white container dated 05/19 was not covered. - Two bowls of pureed fruit and two bowls of pureed bread pudding not covered or labeled and dated. The pureed fruit had a brownish color crust around the edges of the fruit. - Three trays with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communication diseases and infections. AD and CNA I failed to use proper hand hygiene techniques when assisting 2 unidentified residents each (4 residents total) to eat during lunch meal service. These failures had the potential to affect residents in the facility by placing them at risk of contracting, spreading, and/or exposing them to bacterial or viral infections that could lead to the spread of communicable diseases. Findings included: During an observation on 05/21/24 at 12:14 PM revealed AD and CNA I feeding 2 different unidentified residents each at lunch service in the dining room. Both AD and CNA I did not perform hand hygiene between feeding the 2 separate unidentified residents at each of their tables. During an interview on 05/21/24 at 01:46 PM AD stated it was normal for the facility to have staff sit between two residents to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 21 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-23 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that the facility was free of pests for 1 of 1 dining room reviewed for environment. The facility failed to ensure the dining room was free of flies during the resident meal services. These failures could place residents at risk for infection and not receiving a home free of pest or comfortable environment to live. Findings Included: In an observation on 05/21/24 at 12:14 PM multiple flies were seen in and around residents' food throughout the dining room during meal service. A staff member was heard saying to an unidentified resident eat your food the flies are eating it all. AD and CNA I were observed swatting flies as they assisted in feeding 2 unidentified residents each. In an observation on 05/22/24 at 12:20 PM in the dining room multiple flies were observed again during meal services. The DON and SNA were observed swatting flies that were landing on food and flying around as they assisted in feeding two unidentified residents . In an interview on 05/21/24…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident has a right to a dignified existence, self-determination and communication with and access to persons and services inside and outside the facility for two (Resident #57 and Resident #66) out of seven residents reviewed for dignity. 1.The facility failed to treat Resident #57 with respect and dignity by providing privacy during care when Resident #57 was left exposed after a fall and incontinent episode. 2.The facility failed to treat Resident #66 with respect and dignity when he was left with long untrimmed fingernails which could cause skin breakdown, damage and become a source of infection. This failure could place residents needing assistance at risk for diminished quality of life, loss of dignity, and self-worth. Findings included: Review of the Face Sheet for Resident #57 reflected he was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of: COPD, a single Pulmonary Nodule, Atrial Fibrillation, Heart Failure, Type 2 Diabetes,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0640 — isolated
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's assessment was completed within 7 and 14 days, and electronically transmit encoded, accurate, and complete MDS data to the CMS system for a subset of items upon a resident's discharge from the facility for one (Resident #88) of eight residents reviewed for encoding and transmitting resident assessments. The facility failed to complete, encode, and submit a Discharge MDS Assessment for Resident #88. This failure to place discharged residents at risk of not having a proper discharge and not receiving services post discharge. Findings included: Closed record review of Resident #88's Face Sheet, dated 05/23/2024 reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged from the facility on 02/19/2024 with the following diagnoses: Alzheimer's Disease (brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills, and eventually, the ability to carry out the simplest tasks) and Vascular Dementia (changes to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0646 — isolated
    Notify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews the facility failed to update one (Resident #57) out of seven residents reviewed for care plan in relation to changes in health, changes in behavior and significant changes. The facility failed to update Resident #57's care plan and adjust it r/t physician orders or behaviors. The deficient practice could affect residents by delaying treatment, care, and services that could result in residents not attaining or maintaining their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings included: Review of the Face Sheet for Resident #57 reflected he was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of: COPD, a single Pulmonary Nodule, Atrial Fibrillation, Heart Failure, Type 2 Diabetes, Morbid Obesity, Major Depressive disorder, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, and obstructive uropathy. Review of the MDS assessment for Resident #57 dated 3/18/24 reflected a BIMS score of 15 indicating normal cognitive function. His physical assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews the facility failed to update the Resident's (#57) care plan in relation to changes in health, changes in behavior and significant changes for one (Resident #57) out of 8 residents reviewed. The facility failed to update Resident #57's care plan and adjust it in relation to physician orders. The deficient practice could affect residents by delaying treatment, care, and services that could result in residents not attaining or maintaining their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings included: Review of the Face Sheet for Resident #57 reflected he was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of: COPD, a single Pulmonary Nodule, Atrial Fibrillation, Heart Failure, Type 2 Diabetes, Morbid Obesity, Major Depressive disorder, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, and obstructive uropathy. Review of the MDS assessment for Resident #57 dated 3/18/24 reflected a BIMS score of 15 indicating normal cognitive function. His…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to have all residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive care plan, for 1 of 3 (Resident # 54) residents reviewed for edema care. The facility failed to follow physician orders, the comprehensive care plan, and provide treatment for Resident #54's edema. This failure could place residents at risk for untreated medical issues and diminished quality of care. Findings included: Record review of Resident # 54's face sheet dated 05/22/2024 reflected a [AGE] year-old-female admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with a diagnoses of pain in the right foot (a localized or generalized unpleasant bodily sensation or complex of sensations that causes mild to severe physical discomfort), need for assistance with personal care (anything that a person needs to maintain hygiene, well-being, self-esteem, and dignity), essential hypertension (is often due to obesity, family history, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure the environment remains as free of hazards as is possible and each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for one (Resident #71) out of eight residents reviewed. The facility failed to safely and securely store mouthwash and hand sanitizer in Resident #71's room. The deficient practice could affect residents by delaying treatment, care, and services that could result in residents not attaining or maintaining their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings included: Review of the face sheet for Resident #71 reflected he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of: Unspecified Dementia, High Blood Pressure, Chronic Atrial fibrillation, and Bilateral Osteoarthritis of hips. Review of the quarterly MDS assessment for Resident #71 dated 3/04/24 reflected a BIMS score of 5 indicating severe cognitive impairment. His physical assessment reflected…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for one (Resident #1) of four residents reviewed for accidents and hazards. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's IV was inappropriately placed on a IV Pole. This failure could result in residents experiencing accidents, injuries, loss of dignity , and diminished quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 02/29/2024, revealed Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old-female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #1 had the following diagnoses: depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), and schizophrenia (a mental illness or disorder that causes disturbances in though, perception, and behavior, and makes it hard to distinguish reality from imagination. It may involve hearing voices, having false beliefs, or showing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-15 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff did not use physical abuse or corporal punishment on a resident for 1 of 13 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse in that: CNA A slapped Resident #1 on her hand while providing assistance with dressing. This failure could place residents at risk of fear and physical/psychosocial injury. Noncompliance existed from 09/24/23 to 09/29/23, but the facility corrected the noncompliance through training, reviews of clinical information, revision of processes, and the QAPI process. Therefore, the findings are of past noncompliance. Findings included: Review of the undated face sheet for Resident #1 reflected an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, need for assistance with personal care, drug induced, subacute, dyskinesia, insomnia, dementia, major depressive disorder, and generalized anxiety disorder. Review of the quarterly MDS assessment for Resident #1 dated 09/15/23…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 1 of 10 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for ADLs. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was provided assistance with nail care as documented in her plan of care and MDS. This failure could place residents at risk of scratches, infection, and poor self-esteem. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's undated Face Sheet reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Cerebrovascular Disease (group of conditions that affect blood flow and the blood vessels in the brain), Muscle wasting and atrophy (thinning or loss of muscle tissue leading to loss of strength), and Type 2 Diabetes (chronic condition that affects the way he body processes blood sugar, glucose) with Diabetic Neuropathy (nerve damage cause by Diabetes which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-28 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of each resident's needs for 4 of 10 Rresidents (#76, #148, #147 and #49) reviewed for call lights in that: Residents #76, #148, #147 and #49 were observed in their rooms with their call lights not in reach. This failure could affect all residents who needed assistance with activities of daily living and could result in needs not being met. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #76's undated Face Sheet reflected he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Alzheimer's Disease (progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions), Muscle wasting and Atrophy (decrease in size and strength of muscles), repeated falls, unspecified lack of coordination, Type 2 Diabetes (chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar) with Diabetic Neuropathy (nerve…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-28 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and observation, the facility failed to provide a private space for residents' monthly council meetings and the confidential resident group meeting during survey for seven of sevenresidents reviewed for resident council. The facility did not provide a private space for resident council meetings. This failure could place residents, who attended resident council meetings, at risk of not being able to exercise their rights of being able to voice their grievances in a private without uninvited staff being present. Findings Included: In an interview on 03/26/2023 at 1:30 PM, the Activity Director stated the Resident Council meetings were held in the dining room. She stated there was not another area for the residents to meet in private. She stated she would place signs on the doors and have someone to stand at each door to prevent any staff from entering the dining room. She also stated she would notify dietary staff before the meeting not to come out of the kitchen until after the resident group meeting. Record review on 03/27/2023 at 8:30 AM of the Resident Council…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-28 · tag F0575 — pattern
    Post a list of names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups and a statement that the resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Citation Text for Tag 0574, Regulation FF12 [NAME], [NAME] Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the location of the state agency phone number was reviewed with the residents and ensure information was discussed on how to file a complaint with the state agency with seven residents reviewed for resident council. The facility failed to ensure the residents was aware the location in the facility of the phone number for the complaint hotline with the state agency. This failure could prevent residents from calling state agency to voice concerns about their care. Findings included: Observation on 03/25/2023 at 11:45 AM there were medication carts in front of the postings for staff and residents in the display case. The medication carts blocked the postings in the display case except for one posting located at the very top in large print. In an interview on 03/27/2023 at 9:30AM during a confidential resident group meeting held in the dining room with seven residents revealed the residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-28 · tag F0577 — pattern
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, the facility failed to post a notice and inform residents of availability to the results of the most recent survey. The facility failed to inform residents by verbally informing residents or by posting a sign letting the residents know the location of the most recent survey. This failure placed residents at risk of not being able to fully exercise their rights to be informed of the facility's survey citation history. Findings include: In a confidential group interview on 03/27/2023 at 9:30 AM through 10:00 AM, seven residents stated they did not know where or how to access survey results in the facility. Several of the residents stated they would like to have access to this information, because the staff did not tell them anything about visits from the state. Two of the residents stated they did not know the state sent a report to the facility of any type of visits. The other four residents agreed. They all stated it would be great if they knew the results of the surveys. All the residents stated if they were informed at the time of admission they did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 4 of 20 residents (Residents #198, #88, #36 and #197) reviewed for quality of care. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident # 198's facial hair was shaved, his nails were trimmed and cleaned, and his adult brief was changed every two hours. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #88's mustache was trimmed. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #36 received showers on his preferred shower days, failed to trim and clean his fingernails and failed to shave his face. 4. The facility failed to ensure Resident #197 received showers or baths, failed to trim and clean his fingernails, and failed to wash his hair and shave his facial hair. These failures put residents at risk for poor hygiene, dignity issues and decreased quality of life. 1. Review of Resident #198's undated Face Sheet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-28 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status for three (Resident #62, #88, #65) of 16 residents reviewed for nutrition on pureed diets. The facility failed to ensure Resident #62, #88, and #65 whose diet order was for pureed diet maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status and prevented weight loss with effective interventions. This failure put residents at risk for malnutrition, weight loss and decreased quality of life. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #62's face sheet revealed Resident #62 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (progressive disease beginning with mild memory loss and possibly leading to loss of the ability to carry on a conversation and respond to the environment), high blood pressure, epilepsy and arthritis. Review of Resident #62's significant change MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #62 had a BIMS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that drugs and biologicals used in the facility were stored properly for 1 of 2 nurse medication carts (Hall 100) and 1 of 1 Medication storage rooms reviewed for drug storage. The nurse medication cart for Hall 100 had a sticky substance in the cart with loose pills and hair stuck in it. Two bottles of a diabetic nutritional oral supplement with expiration dates of 08/2022 were found in the cart. Three bottles of a diabetic nutritional oral supplement with an expiration date of 08/2022 were found stored in the medication storage room This failure placed residents at risk of receiving contaminated medications and expired oral supplements. Findings included: Observation and Iinterview on [DATE] at 11:55 AM, of the nurse medication cart for Hall 100 revealed the second drawer of the cart had a sticky yellow/brown/black substance with hairs and loose pills stuck to it. Medication bottles were observed sitting in the sticky substance.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-28 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Citation Text for Tag 0557, Regulation FF12 May, [NAME] L. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to promote care for residents in a manner and in an environment that maintained or enhanced each resident's dignity for 2 of 2 residents (Residents #147, and #148) reviewed for dignity. 1. Residents #147's urinary catheter bag was uncovered with dark yellow urine visible from the entrance to her room. 2. Residents #148's urinary catheter bag was uncovered with yellow urine visible upon entering her room. This failure could affect residents by putting them at risk for loss of self-worth and a decline in their psychosocial well-being. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #147's undated Face Sheet reflected she was an 83 -year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] 00/00/00 with diagnoses of Pressure Ulcer of right hip Stage 4 (ulcer extending into the muscle, tendon, ligament, cartilage and possibly exposing bone), Neuromuscular Dysfunction of Bladder (lack of bladder control…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-28 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident that included the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that met professional standards of quality of care and failed to ensure a care plan was developed within 48 hours of a resident's admission for two of eight residents (Resident # 197 and Resident # 148) reviewed for baseline care plans. The facility failed to complete a baseline care plan for Resident # 197 and Resident #148 within the required 48-hour timeframe. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving necessary care and services or having important care needs identified and met. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident # 197's face sheet, dated 03/28/2023, reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included pain in right upper arm ( often due to muscle , tendon- cord-like tissue that connects muscle to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-28 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practice for 2 of 2 residents (Residents #148 and #147) reviewed for oxygen therapy. The facility failed to ensure Resident #148's oxygen tubing and humidifier were dated. The facility failed to ensure Resident #147's oxygen tubing was dated. This failure placed residents at risk of respiratory infections. Findings included: Review of Resident #148's undated Face Sheet reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (progressive nervous system disease that weakens muscles and impacts physical function), Lyme Disease (tick borne illness that causes fatigue and flu-like symptoms), Neoplasm Unspecified (abnormal growth in some part of the body), Anxiety Disorder (mental health disorder characterized by feelings of worry, anxiety, or fear that are strong enough to interfere with one's daily…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-28 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance to ensure that the resident can use the assistive devices when consuming meals and snacks for one resident (Resident #7) of five residents reviewed. The facility failed to provide Resident #7's physician ordered independent mug with lunch. This failure put residents at risk for decreased fluid intake, dehydration and decreased quality of life. Findings included: Review of Resident #7's face sheet dated 03/28/2023 revealed Resident #7 was an [AGE] year old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses of a history of stroke with left upper limb partial paralysis (lack of oxygen to the brain causing immobility to the left upper limb), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (lung disease which causes difficulty breathing), congestive heart disease (chronic condition in which the heart doesn't pump blood as well as it should),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to WELLSENTIAL HEALTH — 67 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 52.7+1.3 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 52.9+1.1 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.6-0.6 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.2+0.8 vs chain
The other 66 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.7★, per CMS)
1 of 5Bastrop Lost Pines Nursing and Rehabilitation CentBastrop, TX 1 of 5Briarcliff Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterMcAllen, TX 1 of 5Brownsville Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterBrownsville, TX 1 of 5Fort Worth Transitional Care CenterFort Worth, TX 1 of 5Hidalgo Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterEdinburg, TX 1 of 5Houston Heights Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterHouston, TX 1 of 5Jefferson Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterBeaumont, TX 1 of 5Laredo West Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterLaredo, TX 1 of 5Lavaca Bay Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterPort Lavaca, TX 1 of 5Longview Hill Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterLongview, TX 1 of 5Spindletop Hill Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterBeaumont, TX 1 of 5Town and Country Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterBoerne, TX 1 of 5Wharton Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterWharton, TX 1 of 5Windsor Nursing And Rehabilitation Center Of RaymoRaymondville, TX 2 of 5Brenham Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterBrenham, TX 2 of 5Cityview Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterFort Worth, TX 2 of 5Corpus Christi Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterCorpus Christi, TX 2 of 5Edinburg Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterEdinburg, TX 2 of 5Elgin Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterElgin, TX 2 of 5Guadalupe Valley Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterSeguin, TX 2 of 5Hallettsville Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterHallettsville, TX 2 of 5Heritage Park Rehabilitation And Skilled Nursing CAustin, TX 2 of 5Live Oak Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterGeorge West, TX 2 of 5Maverick Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterEagle Pass, TX 2 of 5Memorial City Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterHouston, TX 2 of 5Robstown Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterRobstown, TX 2 of 5Southpark Meadows Nursing and Rehabilitation CenteAustin, TX 2 of 5Windsor AtriumHarlingen, TX 2 of 5Windsor Nursing And Rehabilitation Center Of SeguiSeguin, TX 2 of 5Windsor Nursing And Rehabilitation Center Of WeslaWeslaco, TX 2 of 5Windsor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center of AliceAlice, TX 2 of 5Windsor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center of BastrBastrop, TX 2 of 5Windsor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center of MorgaCorpus Christi, TX 2 of 5Yoakum Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterYoakum, TX 3 of 5Harlingen Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterHarlingen, TX 3 of 5Magnolia Crossing Nursing and Rehabilitation CenteHouston, TX 3 of 5Port Lavaca Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterPort Lavaca, TX 3 of 5The Woodlands Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterThe Woodlands, TX 3 of 5Val Verde Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterDel Rio, TX 3 of 5Windsor Mission OaksSan Antonio, TX

Showing 40 of 66; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
SMITHVILLE HOSPITAL AUTHORITYOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 04/01/2018
REGENCY IHS OF BASTROP SILVER PINES, LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2018
CSV RHEA MANAGEMENT HOLDCO, LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 04/01/2018
DWD TX HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 04/01/2018
JACK AND NANCY DWYER WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT CENTER INCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 04/01/2018
REG BRIDGE OPCO LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 04/01/2018
REG HG OPCO LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 04/01/2018
REG OPERATOR HOLDCO LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 04/01/2018
REGENCY INTEGRATED HEALTH SERVICES LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 04/01/2018
REGENCY TEXAS HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 04/01/2018
BAIRD, DANIELIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 04/13/2021
BUNTE, MARKIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 10/27/2020
CLAPP, BARBARAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 06/01/2021
CORTESE, DARENIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 08/10/2021
FULCHER, ANNIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 01/22/2015
MANDELBAUM, ELLIOTIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 01/01/2025
WILSON, LINDAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 07/19/2023
BYRD, SARAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/10/2020
DEKOWSKI, DONOVANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2018
188 OLD AUSTIN HIGHWAY LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2018
REGENCY IHS CLINICAL CONSULTING, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2018
REGENCY IHS REHAB LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2018
BATLLE, AUGUSTINIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
PRESTON, CHRISTIEIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 29 rows in the source record cover these 24 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

13 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-8.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 52%Medicare 3%Other / private 45%

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$294per resident / day
operating cost
$8,944per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$271per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Texas
$5,627/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,666/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 675434. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next