Whispering Oaks Rehab & Nursing

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.52 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 83% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 98 beds and averages 43.7 residents a day — about 45% occupied, or roughly 54 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.06 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.28 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.34 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.44 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.31 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.31 to 0.19 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 37% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · L2025-05-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, and served under sanitary conditions for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for food served under sanitary conditions. Food from the walk-in refrigerator, with readings in the danger zone for 3 days, was served to residents. An Immediate Jeopardy was identified on 5/23/25 at 4:15 pm. While the Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 5/24/25 at 9:00 pm, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of widespead and a severity level of no actual harm with potential for more that minimal harm that is not Immediate Jeopardy due to the facility's need to monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of the plan of removal and corrective actions. This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk for food contamination, food borne illness and a diminished quality of life. The findings included: Record review of the walk-in refrigerator logs reflected: 5/18/25 at 5:10 AM= 55F 7:50 PM=50F 5/19/25 at 4:30 AM= 37F 7:00…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-18 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents have a right to personal privacy for 1 of 6 resident (Residents #21) reviewed for privacy, in that: LVN B left her computer screen open showing Resident #'21's protected information while administering medications. This deficient practice could place residents at-risk of loss of dignity due to lack of privacy.The findings included:Record review of Resident #21's face sheet, dated 07/21/2025, revealed an admission date of 10/03/2019 and, a readmission date of 02/08/2022, with diagnoses which included: Hyperlipidemia (Elevated level of any or all lipids(fat) in the blood), Dementia (decline in cognitive abilities), Peripheral vascular disease (progressive disorder that affects blood flow to the limbs and other body parts), Osteoporosis (causes bones to become weak and brittle) and, Anxiety (A group of mental illnesses that cause constant fear and worry).Record review of Resident #21's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 06/28/2025, revealed the resident had no BIMS score, had memory problem and was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-18 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who is incontinent of bladder receives appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and to restore continence to the extent possible for 1 of 6 resident (Resident #4) reviewed for incontinent care, in that: While providing incontinent care for Resident #4, CNA C used a back to front motion to clean Resident #4's buttocks. This deficient practice could place residents at-risk for infection and skin break down due to improper care practices. The findings were: Record review of Resident #4's face sheet, dated 07/17/2025, revealed an admission date of 04/20/2017, and, a readmission date of 01/03/2024, with diagnoses which included: History of traumatic brain injury (Brain injury caused by an outside force), Dysphagia (Difficulty swallowing), Hypertension (High blood pressure), Congenital hydrocephalus (condition in which too much fluid builds up in the brain). Record review of Resident #4's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-18 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure that CNAs were able to demonstrate competency in skills and techniques necessary to care for residents' needs for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #4) by 1 of 4 CNAs (CNA C) reviewed for competent staff, in that:The facility failed to ensure CNA C used the right technique to clean Resident #4 while providing incontinent care. This deficient practice could place residents at-risk for infection and skin break down due to improper care practices. The findings were: Record review of Resident #4's face sheet, dated 07/17/2025, revealed an admission date of 04/20/2017, and, a readmission date of 01/03/2024, with diagnoses which included: History of traumatic brain injury (Brain injury caused by an outside force), Dysphagia (Difficulty swallowing), Hypertension (High blood pressure), Congenital hydrocephalus (condition in which too much fluid builds up in the brain). Record review of Resident #4's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], revealed the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biological were stored in locked compartments for 1 of 3 medication carts (Treatment cart) reviewed for storage, in that: RN A left the treatment cart unlocked on 1 occasion. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of misappropriation of medications or harm due to accidental ingestion of unprescribed medications.The findings were: Observation on 07/17/2025 at 9:10 a.m. revealed RN A was providing wound care to residents. On one occasion the treatment cart was left unlocked and out of sight of RN A. The lock had not been pushed down to lock the cart. Inside the unlocked cart were wound care supply, ointments, cream, dressing and other supply for treatment including a pair of scissors. Observation on 07/17/2025 at 9:34 a.m., the ADON passed by the cart going down the hall and locked the cart. Interview on 07/17/2025 at 9:35 a.m. with the ADON revealed that the treatment cart should have been kept locked when the nurse was not around it. She stated residents could open the cart…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-18 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
  Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide a therapeutic diet, in the appropriate form as prescribed by a physician for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #19) observed for therapeutic diets. The facility failed to provide Resident #19 a CCHO (Controlled Carbohydrate) NAS (No Added Salt) diet, as ordered by the physician. This failure could affect residents with physician orders for therapeutic diets and could result in consumption of inappropriate food items which could cause elevated blood sugars and a decline in health. The findings were: Record review of Resident #19's face sheet, dated 07/17/2025, revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] (original admission on [DATE]) with diagnoses which included: type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, hypo-osmolality (a condition where the concentration of dissolved particles (solutes) in a fluid, like blood, is lower than normal) and hyponatremia (a condition where there is too much sodium in the blood, indicating a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain clinical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices that are complete and accurately documented for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #12) reviewed for accuracy of medical records. The facility failed to ensure Residents #12 had transcribed orders for suction from the hospice orders to the resident's EMR (Electronic Medical Record). This deficient practice could affect residents whose records are maintained by the facility and could place them at risk for errors in care and treatment. The findings included: Record review of Resident #12's face sheet, dated 07/15/2025, revealed Resident #12 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: cerebral infarction (a condition where a portion of the brain tissue dies due to a lack of blood supply) unspecified, cerebrovascular disease (a group of conditions that affect blood vessels and blood supply to the brain), adult failure to thrive, and disturbances of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infection for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #4) reviewed for infection control, in that: While providing incontinent care for Resident #4, CNA C failed to use proper infection control. These deficient practices could place residents at-risk for infection due to improper care practices. The findings were: Record review of Resident #4's face sheet, dated 07/17/2025, revealed an admission date of 04/20/2017, and, a readmission date of 01/03/2024, with diagnoses which included: History of traumatic brain injury (Brain injury caused by an outside force), Dysphagia (Difficulty swallowing), Hypertension (High blood pressure), Congenital hydrocephalus (condition in which too much fluid builds up in the brain).Record review of Resident #4's Quarterly…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-14 · tag F0641 — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately reflected the resident's status for 3 of 17 Residents (Resident #5, Resident #11 and Resident #42) whose MDS records were reviewed for accuracy. 1. Facility failed to ensure Resident #5's comprehensive MDS, dated [DATE] assessment accurately reflected that he had a suprapubic catheter. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #11's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] accurately reflected she had a significant weight loss. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #42's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] accurately reflected she had received a therapeutic diet while a resident at the facility. This failure could place residents at risk for inadequate care due to inaccurate assessments. The findings included: 1.Record review of Resident #5's quarterly MDS assessment with an ARD of 02/27/2024 reflected he had an indwelling catheter. He scored a 02 out of 15 on his BIMS which signified he was severely cognitively…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment, and services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 2 of 9 residents (Resident #9 and Resident #46) reviewed for care plans. 1. The facility failed to ensure Residents #9's care plan reflected her dental issues of missing teeth. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #46's comprehensive care plan, dated 05/28/2024, reflected nurses might replace plunger back into syringe and push in gently when flushing because the resident had Jejunostomy feeding tube. This deficient practice places residents at risk for not receiving proper care and services due to inaccurate care plans. The findings included: 1. Record review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-14 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to review and revise the comprehensive person-centered care plan for one resident (Resident #28) out of 24 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans timing and revision. Resident #28's annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected she was incontinent of bowel and her comprehensive care was not revised by the MDS Nurse to reflect she was incontinent of bowel. This deficient practice could affect residents who are assessed and have care plans and places them at risk for not receiving necessary care. The findings included: Record review of Resident #28's electronic face sheet dated 06/12/2024 reflected she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included: Alzheimer's disease (an irreversible brain disease that destroys memory, thinking and the ability to carry out daily activities), polyarthritis (refers to a joint disease that involves at least 5 joints, inflammation, pain, movement restriction, warmth, swelling and redness can occur)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ADVANCED HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS — 28 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $16K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX