Heritage House at Paris Rehab & Nursing
150 S.E. 47Th Street, Paris, TX 75462 · For profit - Corporation · 90 certified beds · (903) 784-3100 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Oct 2024
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 2 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (46) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $10,358 in federal fines (most recent 2026-02-04)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 10.7% | 15.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.9% | 3.0% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.8% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 2.9% | 2.4% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.4% | 3.3% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 4.5% | 14.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 14.3% | 18.0% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.9% | 3.8% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 8.5% | 13.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 4.0% | 9.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 94.6% | 88.0% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 28.8% | 25.7% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 25.5% | 12.3% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.69 | 2.17 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.31 | 2.06 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
46.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 65 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 66.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 71 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.35 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 60% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 46.0%CMS range 35.6–58.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.9%CMS range 7.9–15.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 66.2% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 49.3% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 52.1% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 96.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.8% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 9.7% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.2%CMS range 3.9–13.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.02 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 80.4 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.40 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.49 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.00 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.82 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.63 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.56 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
46 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 34 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-02-04 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 5 (Resident #3) residents reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to ensure that the Wound Care Treatment Nurse K notified the physician when Resident #3 was noted to have an open wound to the right side of his scrotum on 02/02/2026. This failure could place residents at risk of complications which include worsening existing wounds, development of new wounds, and infection. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 02/04/2026 indicated Resident #3 was an [AGE] year old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included venous insufficiency peripheral (lack of oxygen to the extremities) hypertension (high blood pressure), neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder (nerve damage to the brain, spinal cord, or peripheral nerves disrupts the normal communication between the nervous system and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2026-02-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 5 (Resident #3) residents reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to ensure that CNA L notified the charge nurse of Resident #3's open wound on the right side of the scrotum on 02/01/2026. This failure could place residents at risk of complications which include worsening of existing wounds, development of new wounds, and infection. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 02/04/2026 indicated Resident #3 was an [AGE] year old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included venous insufficiency peripheral (lack of oxygen to the extremities) hypertension (high blood pressure), neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder (nerve damage to the brain, spinal cord, or peripheral nerves disrupts the normal communication between the nervous system and the bladder resulting in urinary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-04 · tag F0552 — widespreadEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to keep residents informed, in advance, of the care to be furnished and the type of care giver or professional that would furnish the care for 14 of 18 residents reviewed for laboratory services. (Anonymous Residents #1, AR#2, AR #4, AR#5, AR#7, AR#8, AR#9, AR#10, AR#11, AR#12, AR#14, AR#15, AR#16, and AR#17) 1.The facility failed to protect and promote the rights of Anonymous Residents #1, AR#2, AR #4, AR#5, AR#7, AR#8, AR#9, AR#10, AR#11, AR#12, AR#14, AR#15, AR#16, and AR#17 by failing to keep them informed of medical procedures and results. This failure could place residents at risk of decreased psychosocial wellbeing, decreased privacy and decreased quality of life.The findings included:During a record review on 02/03/2026 at 9:45 a.m. of the forms titled 'Resident Council Minutes', dated September 2025 through December 2025 revealed no documented concerns from the residents about being informed of medical procedures or staff entering their rooms without permission.During a record review on 02/03/2026 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-04 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespreadEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to follow the menu to ensure the meals served met the nutritional needs of residents for 1 of 1 meal (the lunch meal), as evidenced by: The facility failed to ensure the Dietary Manager followed the menu for the lunch meal on 02/02/2026. This failure could place residents at risk of weight loss, not having their nutritional needs met, and a decreased quality of life.Findings included: During record review of a facility menu dated 02/02/2026 indicated the meal menu for the day was roast breast of turkey and gravy, savory bread stuffing, green bean casserole, and buttered dinner roll served with margarine, chocolate pudding cake. (Cycle: Texas 6 Week 4 Regular) During an observation of the lunch meal on 02/02/2026 at 12:15 p.m., the residents were served turkey and gravy, bread stuffing, green bean casserole, chocolate pudding cake. The residents were not served a dinner roll. During an interview on 02/02/2026 at 12:25 p.m., the Dietary Manager said there were no rolls to serve any residents in the facility with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-04 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and provide care in a manner that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 7 of 18 anonymous residents reviewed for resident rights (Anonymous Resident (AR) AR#7, AR#8, AR#10, AR#12, AR#13, AR#16, AR#18). The facility failed to protect and promote the rights of Anonymous Residents #7, AR #8, AR #10, AR#12, AR#13, AR#16, and AR#18 by failing to wait for permission to enter the resident's room after knocking. These failures could place residents at risk for decreased self-esteem, decreased privacy and decreased quality of life. The findings included:During a confidential interview at an undisclosed date and time, AR #7 stated they have in the past requested the staff wait for permission to enter their room after knocking. She stated the day before she was sitting on the toilet and the staff member (LVN C) knocked and came into the room with the lunch tray. She stated she was embarrassed, but she was getting used to the staff just coming…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and records reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment and described the services that were to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 3 (Resident #7, Resident #29, and Resident #67) of 18 residents reviewed for care plans. Resident #7 had no care plan developed for her bilateral lower extremity limited range of motion.The care plan for Resident #29 had interventions for a fall mat at bedside that was not implemented.Resident #67 had no care plan developed for his left lower extremity contracture. These failures could place residents at risk of not having their individualized needs met, falls, decreased range of motion and a decline in their quality of care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-04 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure an accurate MDS assessment was completed for 1 of 18 residents reviewed for MDS accuracy. (Resident #17) The facility failed to accurately code Resident #17's use of high-risk drug class medications (drug classes, including antipsychotics, anticoagulants, benzodiazepines, hypnotics, opioids, antiplatelets, hypoglycemics (including insulin), diuretics, and, newly added, anticonvulsants).This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving needed care and services. Findings included:Record review of an undated face sheet revealed Resident #17 was a 72- year-old- female, admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses CHF (congestive heart failure- is a long-term condition that happens when your heart can't pump blood well enough to give your body a normal supply), anxiety (intense, excessive, and persistent worry that interferes with daily life, causing symptoms like restlessness, rapid heartbeat, sweating, trouble sleeping, and difficulty…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain grooming and personal hygiene for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for ADLs (Resident #2). The facility failed to provide assistance for Resident #2 with the removal of facial hair on 02/02/2026. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving services/care and decreased quality of life.Findings Include: 1. Record review of a face sheet dated 01/08/2026 indicated Resident # 2 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Parkinson disease (progressive neurodegenerative disorder impacts central nervous system), congestive heart failure (heart cannot pump blood well enough to supply your body), stiff-man syndrome (autoimmune disease - severe muscle stiffness), hypertension (high blood pressure). Record review of the Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-04 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents with limited range of motion received appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion and/or to prevent further decrease in range of motion for 2 of 5 residents with limited range of motion (Resident #7 and Resident #67) Resident #7 had limited range of motion to bilateral lower extremities with no services to prevent further decrease in range of motion.Resident #67 had an order for a knee brace to prevent further contracture that was not carried out.These failures could place residents at risk of not having their individualized needs met, decreased range of motion and a decline in their quality of care and life.The findings included: 1. Record review of an undated face sheet revealed Resident #7 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of Wernicke's Encephalopathy (an acute, life-threatening neurological emergency caused by a severe deficiency of thiamine (vitamin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-04 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needed respiratory care was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals and preferences for 1 out of 5 residents (Resident #35) reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to have Resident #35's oxygen sign outside the door on 02/02/2026 and 02/03/2026. This failure could place residents who receive oxygen for respiratory care at risk of safety accidents, including fire hazards and potential harm.Findings included: Record review of Resident #35's face sheet, dated 02/04/2026 indicated he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, myopathies (a group of disorders causing primary dysfunction of skeletal muscle fibers causing progressive weakness), dementia (decline in cognitive abilities related to memory, language, and reasoning), dysphagia (difficulty…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-04 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who are trauma survivors receive culturally competent, trauma-informed care in accordance with professional standards of practice and accounting for residents' experiences and preferences in order to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #9) reviewed for trauma-informed care. The facility did not ensure Resident #9 had an accurate trauma screen that identified possible triggers when Resident #9 had a history of trauma. This failure could place residents at an increased risk for severe psychological distress due to re-traumatization.The findings included: 1. Record review of a face sheet dated 02/04/2026 indicated Resident #9 was a [AGE] year-old female originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Alzheimer's (progressive irreversible brain disorder), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (difficulty breathing), Type 2 diabetes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments for 1 of 21 residents reviewed. (Resident #50)The facility failed to securely store wound care treatment chemicals (Povidone-Iodine 10% Solution and .9% Sodium Chloride Irrigation Solution) for Resident #50.This failure could place residents at risk for adverse reactions.Findings included:Record review of Resident #50's face sheet dated 12/15/25 indicated Resident #50 was [AGE] years old and was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Aphasia (a language disorder caused by brain damage), Hypertension (high blood pressure), Amputation of the right foot.Record review of the MDS dated [DATE]indicated Resident #50 could understand and was understood by others. The MDS indicated a BIMS score of 09 indicating Resident #50 had moderately impaired cognition.Record review of a care plan revised on 12/30/25 indicated Resident #50 has impaired cognition and was at risk of a further decline in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 34 citations
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-06 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an ongoing program of activities in accordance with the comprehensive assessment to meet the interests and the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for activities. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's Activities Evaluation was accurately completed on 09/09/2024. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 was provided in-room activities in August 2024, September 2024, and October 2024. This failure could place residents at risk for not having activities to meet their interests or needs and a decline in their physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 11/06/2024 indicated Resident #2 was an [AGE] year-old female initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included vascular dementia (a condition caused by the lack of blood that carries oxygen and nutrient to a part of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-06 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide food that was palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature for 8 of 81 residents residents (Residents #68, #79, #3, #11, #62, #48, #45, and #13) and 1 of 3 meals (lunch meal) reviewed for palatability, attractiveness, and appetizing. The dietary staff failed to provide food that was palatable and appetizing temperature for lunch meal observed on 11/5/24. Resident's #68, #79, #3, #11, #62, #48, #45, and #13 complained that food tasted bad, was not cooked properly and was served cold. These failures could place residents at risk of decreased food intake, hunger, and unwanted weight loss. The findings included: Record Review of the menu indicated the lunch meal items on 11/5/24 included (A) fried chicken, mash potatoes, spinach, dinner roll and ice cream; (B) steak, egg noodles, green peas, dinner roll and ice cream. During an interview on 11/04/24 9:17 a.m., Resident #68 stated the food was bad every day. During an interview on 11/4/24 at 9:53a.m., Resident #79 stated the food was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 3 of 6 residents (Resident #2, Resident #53, and Resident #72) reviewed for infection control. 1. The facility failed to ensure LVN E and CNA F provided proper incontinent care to Resident #2. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #53's bagged, dirty briefs were taken out of her bathroom. 3. The facility failed to ensure CNA H provided proper catheter care to Resident #72, and the facility failed to ensure CNA H followed enhanced barrier precautions when she failed to wear gloves as she repositioned and touched Resident #72's sheets. These failures could place residents and staff at risk for cross-contamination and the spread of infection. Findings included: 1. Record review of a face sheet dated 11/06/2024 indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-06 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for 1 of 23 residents (Resident #76) reviewed for accommodation of needs. The facility treatment nurse failed to ensure Resident #76's lunch meal was fully accessible for her to eat on 11/04/2024 at the lunch meal, when the Treatment Nurse served Resident #76 her lunch meal and did not remove it off the tray and kept her plate on the warmer and covered with a lid. This failure could have placed resident at risk of having nutritional needs gone unmet. Findings included: Record review of Resident #76's face sheet dated 11/06/2024 indicated she was a [AGE] year-old female who re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses vascular dementia(disease in which it causes memory loss in older adults), glaucoma of left eye severe stage(eye condition that causes blindness), high blood pressure,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-06 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure prompt efforts were made to resolve grievances for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #40) reviewed for grievances. The facility did not ensure a grievance was filed and Resident #40 was appropriately apprised of progress toward resolution when Resident #40's pink pants were not returned from the laundry. This failure could place residents at risk for grievances not being addressed or resolved promptly. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 11/06/2024 indicated Resident #40 was a [AGE] year-old female initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted [DATE] with diagnoses which included sequelae of unspecified cerebrovascular disease (medical conditions that affect the blood vessels of the brain and circulation of blood to the brain). Record review of the MDS assessment indicated Resident #40 was understood by others and was able to understand others. The MDS assessment indicated Resident #40 had a BIMS score of 15, which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for 1 of 23 residents (Resident #63) reviewed for ADL (activities of daily living) care. The facility failed to provide nail care by removing black material from under fingernails for dependent female Resident #63 on 11/04/2024,11/05/2024, and 11/06/2024. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving care and services to meet their needs. Findings included: Record review of the face sheet, dated 11/06/2024, revealed Resident #63 was a [AGE] year old female with diagnoses which included malignant neoplasm of unspecified part of the right bronchus or lung (cancer that forms in tissues of the lungs, usually in the cell lining air passages), chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia), hemiplegia and hemiparesis following…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-06 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who was incontinent of the bladder and had an indwelling urinary catheter received appropriate treatment and services for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #72) reviewed for urinary catheters. The facility failed to ensure CNA H provided proper catheter care to Resident #72 on 11/06/2024. This failure could place residents at risk of injury, urinary tract infections, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 11/06/2024 indicated Resident #72 was an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety (loss of memory, language, problem solving and other thinking abilities that were severe enough to interfere with daily life) and urinary retention. Record review of a Comprehensive MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-06 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that respiratory care was provided consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 2 residents (Residents #2) reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 had an order for oxygen. This failure could place residents requiring respiratory care at risk for respiratory complications. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 11/06/2024 indicated Resident #2 was an [AGE] year-old female initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included vascular dementia (a condition caused by the lack of blood that carries oxygen and nutrient to a part of the brain causes problems with reasoning, planning, judgment, and memory) and shortness of breath. Record review of the Comprehensive MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #2 was sometimes understood by others and understood others. The MDS assessment indicated Resident #2 had a short-term…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-06 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who are trauma survivors receive culturally competent, trauma-informed care in accordance with professional standards of practice and accounting for residents' experiences and preferences in order to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #15 and Resident #46) reviewed for trauma-informed care 1. The facility did not ensure Resident #46 had an accurate trauma screen that identified possible triggers when Resident #46 had a history of trauma. 2. The facility did not ensure Resident #15's trauma screening was completed with triggers upon admission to the facility. These failures could place residents at an increased risk for severe psychological distress due to re-traumatization. The findings included: 1. Record review of a face sheet dated 11/06/2024 indicated Resident #46 was a [AGE] year-old female originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-06 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents were free of significant medication errors for 2 of 23 residents reviewed for pharmacy services. (Resident # 15 and Resident # 68) The facility failed to ensure Resident #15's Metoprolol and Hydralazine (blood pressure medication) was not administered when her blood pressure was outside of the ordered parameters (systolic blood pressure less than 100 and diastolic blood pressure less than 60) on 10/06/2024. The facility failed to ensure Resident #68's Hydralazine (blood pressure medication) was not administered when her blood pressure was outside of the ordered parameters on 10/24/2024. These failures could place the resident at risk of medical complications and not receiving the therapeutic effects of their medications. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #15's face sheet dated 11/05/2024, indicated a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included bipolar disorder current…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments under proper temperature controls and permit only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for 1 of 4 medication carts. LVN M failed to ensure the 100 Hall medication cart was locked when it was left unattended while she went to the restroom. This failure could place residents at risk of injury. Findings included: During an observation on 11/05/24 at 04:42 PM the hall 100 medication cart was unlocked, unattended, and parked beside the centralized nursing station. During an observation on 11/05/24 at 04:45 PM ADON N walked up to the hall 100 medication cart and locked it. She said the charge nurses were responsible for ensuring their medication carts were locked prior to walking away from them. She said there were all types of risks associated with the cart being left unlocked and unattended. ADON N said some of the risks associated with leaving the medication cart unlocked and unattended included theft of medications, poisoning for residents, and overdose. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in (1 of 1) kitchen reviewed for dietary services. 1) The Dietary staff failed to label and date all food items. 2) The Dietary staff failed to dispose of expired foods items located in the refrigerator and freezer. These failures could place residents at risk for food contamination and foodborne illness. The findings included: During observations on 11/04/24 at 9:11 a.m., the following observations were made in the kitchen walk in freezer (1 of 1) (1) zip lock bag of frozen catfish had an open date of 10/26/24 and an expiration date of 11/2/24. (expired) (1) 1/2-quart container of celery had a preparation date of 10/21/24 and an expiration date of 10/27/24. (expired) During observations on 11/04/24 at 9:17 a.m., the following observations were made in the kitchen walk in Refrigerator (1 of 1) (1) container of tomato juice was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-06 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to promote antibiotic stewardship by ensuring the appropriate use of antibiotic therapy and providing written rationale, by the provider, when an antibiotic was used despite criteria, to determine the appropriate the use of an antibiotic for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #8) reviewed for antibiotic use. The facility failed to ensure Resident #8 had documented signs and symptoms to support the use of prescribed antibiotics. This failure could place residents receiving antibiotics at risk for unnecessary antibiotic use, inappropriate antibiotic use, and increased antibiotic-resistant infections. The findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 11/06/2024 indicated Resident #8 was an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety (loss of memory, language, problem solving and other thinking…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-16 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation or resident property, and exploitation for 1 of 17 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to keep Resident #1 free from abuse when CNA A roughly provided incontinent care to him on 06/07/2024. This failure could place residents at risk of abuse, humiliation, intimidation, fear, shame, agitation and a decreased quality of life. Findings include: Record review of a Grievance/Complaint Report dated 06/07/2024, received by ADON B reflected Resident #1's family member requested gentle movements of his legs during care. Documented facility follow-up action was to in-service staff members with 1:1 education and physical therapy in-service regarding transfer of resident out of bed. Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 10/17/2024, reflected a [AGE] year old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, if the events that caused the allegation involved abuse or resulted in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency and adult protective services where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities) in accordance with State law through established procedures for 1 of 17 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse and neglect. The facility failed to report to Health and Human Services Commission Resident #1's family member's allegation that CNA A roughly provided incontinent care to the resident on 06/07/2024. This failure could place residents at risk for abuse, humiliation, intimidation, fear,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment, and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for infection control practices. 1. CNA A failed to change her gloves and perform hand hygiene after removing Resident #1's soiled brief on 06/07/2024. 2. CNA A failed to dispose of Resident #1's soiled brief properly after removing it during incontinent care on 06/07/2024. These failures could place residents at risk of exposure to communicable diseases, cross-contamination, and infections. Findings include: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 10/17/2024, indicated Resident #1 was a [AGE] year old male admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which include dementia (a group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-09-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in (1 of 1) kitchen reviewed for dietary services, in that: 1) The facility failed to label and date all food items. 2) Dietary staff failed to dispose of expired foods items. 3) Dietary Staff failed to store (1) dented can in a separate area. 4) Dietary Staff failed to effectively reseal, label and date frozen food items. 5) Dietary Staff failed to label and date beverage items in the dining room for resident use. These failures could place residents at risk for food contamination and foodborne illness. The findings included: During observations on 09/25/23 beginning at 9:26 am, the following observations were made in the kitchen walk-in freezer (1 of 1): -(1) pack of Pork Ribs had a prep date of 9/20/23 was missing the use by date. -(1) container of chicken breast had a prep date of 9/21/23 was missing the use by date. -(1) bag of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to develop or implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan to meet resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs identified in the comprehensive assessment for 3 of 20 residents reviewed for care plans. (Resident #25, #34, and #60) 1. The facility failed to care plan Resident #25's refusal of showers. 2. The facility failed to care plan that Resident #34 was PASRR (Preadmission Sceening and Resdient Review) positive. 3. The facility failed to care plan Resident #60's cracked teeth. These failures could place residents at risk for inaccurate care plans and decreased quality of care. The findings included: 1. Record review of the face sheet, dated 09/27/2023, revealed Resident #25 was a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of unspecified dementia, without behavioral disturbance (group of symptoms that affects memory, thinking and interferes with daily life), essential (primary) hypertension (high…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-27 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the meals served met the nutritional needs of residents for 1 of 1 meals (the lunch meal) reviewed for nutritional adequacy, as evidenced by: The facility served the residents on a pureed food consistency diet the wrong scoop size servings on the buttered broccoli florets for the noon time (lunch) meal on 9/26/23. This failure had the potential to affect all residents in the facility who required pureed food consistency by placing them at risk of not receiving adequate nutritive food value needed to promote/maintain health. Findings included: Record review of the facility diet and nourishment roster on 09/25/2023 indicated there were 8 residents in the facility on pureed food consistency diet. Record Review of the week 1 menu dated on 9/20/23, indicated the lunch meal (A) items included Fried Cod, Lemon Wedge, French Fries, [NAME] Slaw, Dinner roll, Margarine, Chocolate Brownie, whole milk, hot coffee or hot tea, tartar sauce lunch…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-27 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide food that was palatable, attractive and at a safe and appetizing temperature for 1 of 3 meals reviewed for palatability and temperature. The facility failed to provide food that was palatable and appetizing temperature for 1 of 3 meal observed on 9/26/23 (lunch) meal. These failures could place residents at risk of decreased food intake, hunger, and unwanted weight loss. The findings included: During an interview on 09/25/23 at 9:45 AM, Resident #42 stated the food was usually cold and They act like they don't know how to cook. Resident #42 stated the Meat was bad, and sometimes she could not even cut it. During an interview on 09/25/23 at 9:59 AM, Resident #54 stated the food did not have any seasoning at all and that it was bland. During an interview on 09/25/23 at 10:16 AM, Resident #57 stated the food was not cold, but it was not warm enough. During an interview on 09/25/23 at 11:10 AM, Resident #60 stated the food was always…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-27 · tag F0849 — patternArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to collaborate with hospice representatives and coordinate the hospice care planning process for each resident receiving hospice services, to ensure quality of care for the resident, ensuring communication with the hospice medical director, the resident's attending physician, and others participating in the provision of care for 3 of 3 resident (Residents #31,#44 and #51) reviewed for hospice services. The facility did not ensure Resident #31, #44 and #51's hospice records were a part of their records in the facility. This failure could place residents who receive hospice services at-risk of receiving inadequate end-of-life care due to a lack of documentation, coordination of care and communication of resident needs. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #31's face sheet, dated 09/27/2023, indicated Resident #31 was a [AGE] year-old female, originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included cancer of right breast. Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-27 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to promote antibiotic stewardship by ensuring the appropriate use of antibiotic therapy and providing written rationale, by the provider, when an antibiotic was used despite criteria, to determine the appropriate the use of an antibiotic for 4 of 4 residents and reviewed antibiotic use. (Resident #21, Resident #46, Resident #48, Resident #64) The facility failed to ensure Resident #21, Resident #46, Resident #48, and Resident #64 had documented signs and symptoms, appropriate lab work, and diagnoses to support the use of prescribed antibiotics. These failures could place residents receiving antibiotics at risk for unnecessary antibiotic use, inappropriate antibiotic use, and increased antibiotic-resistant infections. The findings included: 1. Record review of the face sheet, dated 09/27/2023, revealed Resident #21 was a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of chronic kidney disease (condition characterized by a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-27 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — patternDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop, implement, and maintain annually an effective training program for existing staff, consistent with their expected roles for 12 of 20 employees (RN D, Dietician, Occupational Therapist F, Physical Therapist G, Dietary Manager, Social Worker, CNA H, CNA K, CNA L, CNA M, Maintenance Director, Housekeeping Supervisor) reviewed for required trainings. The facility failed to ensure the Maintenance Director, the Housekeeping Supervisor, Occupational Therapist F, Physical Therapist G, CNA H, CNA K, CNA L, and CNA M received HIV and restraint training upon hire. The facility failed to ensure RN D, the Dietary Manager, the Social Worker, received annual HIV and restraint training. The facility failed to ensure the Dietician received annual restraint training. This failure could place residents at risk for inappropriate restraints and exposure to HIV. Findings included: Record review of the employee files revealed there was no HIV or restraint training completed upon hire for the following staff: Maintenance Director hire…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and provide care in a manner that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 1 of 20 (Resident #33) residents reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to ensure RN D fed Resident #33 while sitting down. This failure could place residents at an increased risk of embarrassment, isolation, and diminished quality of life. Findings included: During a dining observation on 09/25/2023 at 11:57 a.m., RN D was standing up while feeding Resident #33 green peas and a piece of cod fish. During an interview on 09/25/2023 at 2:29 p.m., Resident #33 was non-interviewable as evidenced by confused conversation. During a telephone interview on 09/27/2023 at 3:13 p.m., RN D stated she knew she had to sit at eye level while feeding Resident #33, but she was the nurse for the dining room and had to oversee all residents. RN D further stated Resident #33 was blind and had to be assisted with his meals. RN D stated it was important to treat residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-27 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents have the right to be informed in advance, by the physician or other practitioner or professional, of the risks and benefits of proposed care, of treatment and treatment alternatives and to choose the option he or she prefers for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for the right to be informed. (Resident #2 and Resident #33) 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 had a signed psychotropic consent form for alprazolam (antianxiety medication), Belsomra (sedative-hypnotic medication), and Remeron (antidepressant medication). 2. The facility did not ensure Resident #33 had a signed informed consent based on information of the need, benefits, and risk prior to administering Ativan (a medication used to treat anxiety). These failures could place residents at risk for treatment or services provided without their informed consent. The findings included: 1. Record review of the face sheet, dated 09/27/2023, revealed Resident #2 was an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-27 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' rights to formulate an advance directive for 2 of 18 residents reviewed for advanced directives. (Resident #10 and Resident # 73) The facility failed to ensure Resident #10 and Resident # 73's code status was accurate and consistent with all records at the facility. This failure placed the residents at risk of not having their end of life wishes honored. Findings included: Record review of Resident #10's face sheet dated 9/26/23, revealed Resident #10 was a [AGE] year-old female with a diagnose of vascular dementia (changes to memory, thinking, and behavior resulting from conditions that affect the blood vessels in the brain), atherosclerotic heart disease (the buildup of fats, cholesterol and other substances in and on the artery walls), hypertension (when the pressure in your blood vessels is too high (140/90 mmHg or higher), hypothyroidism (when the thyroid gland doesn't make enough thyroid hormones to meet your body's needs)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-27 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to consult with the resident's physician when there was a significant change in the resident's physical and mental status that is, a deterioration in health, mental, or psychosocial status in either life-threatening conditions or clinical complications for 2 of 20 (Residents #46 and #135) residents reviewed for notification of change of condition. 1. The facility did not ensure RN D notified the physician when Resident #46 fell on [DATE]. 2. The facility failed to notify and consult with the physician about the changes in Resident #135's fall. This failure could place residents at risk of a delay in treatment, and a worsening of their condition. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #46's face sheet, dated 09/27/2023, indicated Resident #46 was a [AGE] year-old male, originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included fracture of right femur (the bone of the thigh) and essential hypertension (high blood pressure). Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-27 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to implement written policies and procedures to prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation for 3 of 20 staff members (Physical Therapist, House Keeping and Food Service Supervisor) reviewed for develop and implement abuse policies. The facility failed to ensure the Human Resource (HR) Coordinator implemented the facility's abuse/neglect policy and procedure when she failed to complete an Employee Misconduct Registry (EMR) check for CNA G upon hire and annually for the Maintenance Supervisor, Activity Director, and Food Service Supervisor. This failure could place residents at risk for abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of property. Findings included: Record review of the facility's Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation policy revised on 10/24/2022, indicated . It is the police of this facility to provide protection for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-27 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately reflected the resident status for 2 of 20 residents (Resident #34 and Resident #42) reviewed for MDS assessment accuracy. The facility did not ensure Resident #34's and Resident #42's MDS assessments were accurately coded to reflect their level II PASRR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) status for mental illness. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving care and services to meet their needs. Findings included: 1. Record review of a face sheet dated 09/27/2023, indicated Resident #34 was an [AGE] year-old female initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses which included major depressive disorder (a serious mood disorder involving one or more episodes of intense psychological depression or loss of interest or pleasure that lasts two or more weeks with hallucinations or delusions), recurrent, severe with psychotic symptoms, anxiety disorder, unspecified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents requiring respiratory care were provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practices for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #17, #69) reviewed for respiratory care. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #17's oxygen was set at 3 LPM as ordered by the physician. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #69 oxygen concentrator filters were cleaned. These failures could place residents who receive respiratory care at risk for developing respiratory complications and a decreased quality of care. The findings included: 1. Record review of the face sheet, dated 09/27/2023, revealed Resident #17 was a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of COPD (chronic inflammatory lung disease that causes obstructed airflow from the lungs) and shortness of breath. Record review of the MDS assessment, dated 09/27/2023, revealed Resident #17 had clear speech and was understood by staff.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure all drugs were stored in a locked compartment, only accessible by authorized personnel, and labeled and dated correctly for 2 of 2 nurses' carts (Nurse Cart Hall 1&4, and Nurse Cart Hall 2&3) reviewed for drugs and biologicals and storage of medications. The facility failed to ensure Nurse Cart Hall 1&4, and Nurse Cart Hall 2&3 were secured and unable to be accessed by unauthorized personnel. The facility failed to ensure 1 insulin pen (device used to administer insulin to residents with high blood sugars) on the Nurse Cart Hall 2&3 was dated when opened. These failures could place residents at risk of misuse of medications, drug diversions, and not receiving the therapeutic benefit of medications Findings included: During an observation and interview on [DATE] at 7:06 AM, LVN X left nurse cart unlocked while in resident room performing blood sugar check. LVN X stated the cart should be locked. LVN X stated she just forgot to lock…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-27 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assist residents in obtaining routine dental services to meet the needs of 1 of 20 (Resident #60) residents reviewed for dental services. The facility failed to ensure Resident #60 obtained prompt dental services when he had cracked teeth and a tooth infection. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving needed dental care and a decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 09/27/2023 indicated Resident #60 was a [AGE] year-old male initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses which included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following unspecified cerebrovascular disease affecting left non-dominant side (weakness of the left side of the body caused by decreased circulation to the brain), heart failure, unspecified (chronic, progressive condition in which the heart muscle is unable to pump enough blood to meet the body's needs for blood and oxygen), and unspecified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-27 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs for 2 of 9 residents (Resident #2 and Resident #25). 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 received her health shake with her lunch meal as ordered by the physician. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #25 received a mechanical soft diet during the lunch meal as ordered by the physician. These failures could place residents with a therapeutic diet at risk for poor intake, weight loss, not meeting their nutritional needs and choking. The findings included: 1. Record review of the face sheet, dated 09/27/2023, revealed Resident #2 was an [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of recurrent depressive disorders (episodes of depression after periods of time without symptoms), anxiety disorder (characterized by significant and uncontrollable feelings of anxiety and fear), and unspecified atrial fibrillation (disease of the heart…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-27 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure each resident received and the facility provided food that accommodates resident preferences 1 of 78 residents (Resident #29) reviewed for resident food preferences. The facility failed to ensure Resident #29 received her preferred meal choice. This failure placed residents at risk for not having their nutritional needs met and a decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #29 face sheet dated 9/26/2023 revealed resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to facility on 10/11/2021 had diagnosis of muscle weakness generalized (lack of muscle strength), dementia without behavioral disturbance (loss of memory, language, problem solving and other thinking abilities that were severe enough to interfere with daily life), type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications (chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar), iron deficiency anemia (a condition in which blood lacks adequate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$10,358 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $10,358 — penalty dated 2026-02-04
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to ADVANCED HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS — 28 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.0 | +1.0 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.0 | ≈ chain avg |
The other 27 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| HOOPER, GRADY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 02/29/2024 |
| PARIS HC LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/08/2025 |
| SCHEINER, ELIEZER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 02/29/2024 |
| SILBERSTEIN, ARI | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 02/29/2024 |
| ELLENBOGEN, MOSS | Individual | TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2024 |
| 150 47TH STREET LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/18/2025 |
| BRASS TX TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/08/2025 |
| GOLD TX TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/08/2025 |
| RED BRASS HOLDCO LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/08/2025 |
| SILVER TX TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/08/2025 |
| BENNETT, KYLE | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2024 |
| GANGULY, DEVABRATA | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/18/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $187K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in TX
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 676294. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-04, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.