No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

El Paso Health & Rehabilitation Center

11525 Vista Del Sol Drive, El Paso, TX 79936 · Government - Hospital district · 150 certified beds · (915) 855-3636 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0604, F0607) — most recent Sep 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)2 immediate-jeopardy citations$20,312 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (55) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $20,312 in federal fines (most recent 2023-09-01)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
11544 Vista del Sol Dr · (915) 592-2600 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1485 George Dieter Dr · (915) 521-7087 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1580 George Dieter Dr · (915) 857-1131 · Call to confirm hours
Park
11600 Vista del Sol Dr · (915) 865-7456 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
11501 Vista del Sol Dr

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased20.3%15.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.1%3.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.8%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.4%2.4%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.8%3.3%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened13.4%14.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication12.3%18.0%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.2%3.8%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control16.8%13.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table11.0%9.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication3.0%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine88.1%88.0%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission25.7%25.7%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit9.9%12.3%12.0%better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

10.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.41U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.16hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.14hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.11hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.41 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 70% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.1%CMS range 6.4–14.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay7.4%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.961.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.29
RN hours/ resident / day
0.92
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.91
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.12
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.26
RN hoursweekends
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 150 beds and averages 90.9 residents a day — about 61% occupied, or roughly 59 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.12 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.29 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.91 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.61 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.33 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.30 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

3
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-07)
11
at the previous standard inspection (2024-06-20)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

55 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 43 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2023-09-01 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to immediately consult with resident physician and notify the resident representative when there was a significant change in the resident's physical or mental status that is, a deterioration in health, mental, or psychosocial status in either life-threatening conditions or clinical complications for 1 of 5 (Resident #1) reviewed for notification of changes of condition. The facility failed to notify the physician and establish vital signs when [AGE] year-old female Resident #1, with a history of dementia, had multiple episodes of emesis. The facility failed to report to the NP or MD 08/10/23 when Resident #1 had a total of six episodes of emesis, beginning at approximately 10 a.m. The day shift CNA stated she informed the day RN after the second episode. The CNAs notified the facility nurses again at the change of shift, 2:20 pm, after 4 episodes. The facility failed to notify the NP or MD until 5:00 pm-5:30 pm after the fifth episode and was not informed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2023-09-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive care plan, and the residents' choices for 1 of 5 (Resident #1) reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to notify the physician and establish vital signs when [AGE] year-old female Resident #1, with a history of dementia, had multiple episodes of emesis. The facility failed to report to the NP or MD 08/10/23 when Resident #1 had a total of six episodes of emesis, beginning at approximately 10 a.m. The day shift CNA stated she informed the day RN after the second episode. The CNAs notified the facility nurses again at the change of shift, 2:20 pm, after 4 episodes. The facility failed to notify the NP until 5:00 pm-5:30 pm after the fifth episode and was not informed of Resident #1 being described as pale and shaking. NP stated if the nurses would have taken vitals for Resident #1 it would have established the baseline…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed in that:-The facility failed on 8/4/25 to thaw two bags of boneless pork loin properly.-The facility failed on 8/4/25 to seal a receptacle containing refried beans in refrigerator #1.-The facility failed on 8/4/25 to seal Ziplock bags containing jalapenos and onions in refrigerator #1.-The facility failed on 8/4/25 to label an object approximately 15 inches long, wrapped in brown butcher paper and sealed in plastic wrap that was found inside refrigerator #2. -The facility failed on 8/4/25 to seal a receptacle containing cooked beef in refrigerator #2 and it was not used by the labeled use by date.-The facility failed on 8/5/25 to prevent cross-contamination while preparing puree diets.These failures could place residents who eat foods prepared in the kitchen at risk of cross contamination and food-borne illnesses.The findings include:During observation and interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs for one (Resident #9) of four resident reviewed for care plans.The facility failed to have a comprehensive person-centered care plan for Resident #9 to address the Resident's prescribed psychotropic medication, Mirtazapine 7.5 mg by mouth at bedtime.This failure could affect residents prescribed psychotropic medications by placing them at risk for not receiving care and services to meet their needs.Findings Include:Record review of Resident #9's face sheet dated 08/07/25 revealed an [AGE] year-old female with an admission date 06/09/21.Record review of Resident #9's health and physical dated 04/16/25 revealed resident's medical history, which were the following: Stroke (sudden interruption of continuous blood flow to the brain), Type 2 Diabetes (when the body cannot use…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure biologicals were stored in locked compartments and accessed by authorized personnel for 1 (Resident #21) of 8 residents reviewed for medication storage, in that: Resident # 21 had two clear measuring cups at bedside, one with crushed medications and the second with a clear liquid, exposed and within reach of other residents. This failure could place residents at risk of access to medications not approved for administration by their physician. Findings included: Record Review of Resident # 21s' admission record dated 8/06/2025 revealed an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Record Review of Resident # 21's' history and physical dated 06/10/2025 revealed diagnoses of high blood pressure, other recurrent depressive disorder, constipation and rhabdomyolysis (a breakdown of muscle tissue that releases a damaging protein into the blood). Record Review of Resident # 21s' Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living receives the necessary services to maintain good grooming, personal and oral hygiene, for 1 Resident (#1) of 6 residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility failed to provide fingernail care for Resident #1 by not maintaining trim and clean fingernails. This failure could place residents at risk of not having their personal hygiene needs met and cause low self-esteem. The findings include: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 3/27/25, indicated the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses: hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body, either right or left) and hemiparesis (weakness of one side of the body, either right or left) following cerebral infarction (stroke) affecting left non-dominant side, dysarthria (difficulty in speech because of weakness of the speech muscles), unspecified dementia, and Alzheimer's disease (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure a resident who needs respiratory care is provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice for 2 of 10 residents (Residents #2, #3) who were reviewed for respiratory care in that: 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's oxygen concentrator filter was clean. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3's oxygen concentrator filter was clean. These deficiencies could affect the residents who received continuous oxygen and oxygen as needed and can result in a respiratory infection. Findings include: Resident #2 Record Review of Resident #2's face sheet dated 3/27/25 revealed a [AGE] year-old male that was admitted [DATE]. Resident #2 diagnoses included: Lymphedema (a condition of localized swelling caused by compromised lymphatic system), muscle weakness, obstructive sleep apnea, and peripheral vascular disease (a condition that narrows the vessels away from the heart and brain causing pain and discomfort…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-01-15 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure they had a full time DON for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for DON coverage. The facility failed to have a full-time DON since 12/05/24 . This failure could place residents at risk of a lack of nursing oversight and a higher level of care. Findings included: Record review of staff hours from 12/01/24 through 01/15/25 indicated there was no DON in the facility from 12/06/24 through 01/15/25. In an interview on 01/14/25 at 8:40 AM, with the Administrator, ADON C, and ADON D, the Administrator stated the facility currently did not have a DON. ADON C stated the facility did not have an acting or interim DON. ADON D stated the facility was looking for a DON. In an interview on 01/15/25 at 10:53 AM, with ADON C and ADON D, ADON C stated they did not have a full time DON but were actively seeking to hire a DON. ADON D stated the facility was about to hire a DON but the applicant at the last minute turned down the offer. ADON C stated the facility was using social media and other websites to actively try to recruit…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain housekeeping and maintenance services to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior for 1 of 6 resident rooms, observed for housekeeping and maintenance, in that: The facility failed to ensure CNA E used the facility work order system to input the lights in the restroom and room of Resident #5 would not turn on while Resident #5 wanted to use the restroom but was dark and could not see. These failures could lead to resident injury and a diminished quality of life. Findings include: Record review of Resident #5's face sheet dated 01/15/25, revealed, admission on [DATE], re-admission on [DATE], and re-admission again on 02/22/22 to the facility. Record review of Resident #5's facility history and physical dated 07/28/24, revealed, a [AGE] year-old female diagnosed with Anxiety, Cholecystitis (inflammation of the gallbladder), reduced mobility, history of falls, and GI bleeding (bleeding from any part of the digestive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the residents environment remains free of accidents hazards as possible and each resident receives adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 (Resident #3) of 3 residents reviewed for accidents and supervision. The facility failed to ensure CNA A secured the brakes on a mechanical lift when lifting and lowering Resident #3 to bed. This failure could place residents at risk for falls or injury. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #3's face sheet dated 1/14/25 revealed a [AGE] year-old female was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #3's history and physical dated 11/27/24 revealed diagnoses of diabetes (blood sugar is too high), hypertension (high blood pressure), pulmonary embolism (blood clot that blocks and stops blood flow to an artery in the lung), and an unstageable pressure ulcer of the heel. Record review of Resident #3's significant change in condition MDS assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-23 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure resident#1 was free from any physical or chemical restraints imposed for purposes of discipline or convenience for one (Resident #2) of five residents reviewed for freedom from physical restraints. The facility failed to ensure Residents #2 did not have pillows under his mattress which restricted his movement from getting off the bed and were not required to treat his medical symptoms. This failure could put residents at risk of unnecessary restriction of their movements. Findings included: Resident #2 Record review of Resident #2's admission Record revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat), atherosclerosis (with rest pain bilateral legs, type 2 diabetes, hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol), unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance, hypertension, vascular disease, and shortness of breath. Record review of Resident #2's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-17 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure residents the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for 1 (Residents #1) of 8 residents reviewed for call light placement. -The facility failed to ensure that Residents #1's call light was within his reach. This failure placed residents at risk of not being able to call for assistance when needed. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's admission Record dated 09/13/2024, revealed a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #1's diagnoses included cerebral palsy (congenital disorder of movement, muscle tone, or posture), depressive disorder (mental health disorder characterized by persistently depressed mood or loss of interest in activities, causing significant impairment in daily life), muscle weakness, lack of coordination, intellectual disability (deficits in theoretical thinking/learning),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 43 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan that included measurable objectives and time frames to meet a resident's medical and nursing needs and described the services to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 (Resident #1) of 7 residents reviewed for care plans. -The facility failed to follow the comprehensive person-centered care plan for Resident #1's fall risk, by failing to have a fall mat in place next to bed while resident was lying down in bed. This deficient practice could place residents in the facility at risk of not receiving the necessary care or services as indicated in their comprehensive person-centered plans developed to address their needs. Findings include: Review of Resident #1's admission Record dated 09/13/2024, revealed a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE].…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-17 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to review and revise Resident Care Plans after each assessment for 1 (Resident #1) of 8 residents whose records were reviewed. -Resident #1's Care Plan was not updated to reflect discontinuation of padding the wall. These deficient practices could lead to errors in treatment and services provided based on incorrect information. Findings included: Resident #1: Review of Resident #1's admission Record dated 09/13/2024, revealed a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #1's diagnoses included cerebral palsy (congenital disorder of movement, muscle tone, or posture), depressive disorder (mental health disorder characterized by persistently depressed mood or loss of interest in activities, causing significant impairment in daily life), muscle weakness, lack of coordination, intellectual disability (deficits in theoretical thinking/learning), seizures (uncontrolled jerking, loss of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for 1 (Residents #1) of 7 residents reviewed for assistance with ADLs. -The facility failed to ensure Residents #1's fingernails were trimmed and cleaned. This failure could place residents who were dependent on staff for ADL care at risk for loss of dignity, risk of infection, and decreased quality of life. Findings include: Review of Resident #1's admission Record dated 09/13/2024, revealed a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #1's diagnoses included cerebral palsy (congenital disorder of movement, muscle tone, or posture), depressive disorder (mental health disorder characterized by persistently depressed mood or loss of interest in activities, causing significant impairment in daily life), muscle…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-17 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who are fed by enteral means received the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications of enteral feeding for 1 (Resident #3) of 4 residents reviewed for gastrostomy tube management quality of care. -The facility failed to ensure Residents #3 was provided with the correct feeding through gastrostomy tube (g-tube, feeding tube) as ordered per physician. This failure could place residents who received feedings by gastrostomy tube at risk for decline in health and weight loss. Findings included: Review of Resident #3's admission Record dated 09/13/2024, revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #3's diagnoses included cerebral infarction (lack of oxygen to the brain causing damage to brain tissue), unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition, dysphagia (swallowing difficulties), and gastrostomy status (a feeding tube that delivers nutrition to your stomach). Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment for 2 (Resident #2 and Resident #5) of 4 residents and 1 (room [ROOM NUMBER]B) of 3 rooms reviewed for environment. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's blue face of the feeding pump machine had white unknown substance. The top of the feeding pump machine was dirty with a brown-ish substance. Resident #5's feeding pump machine was greasy and dirty. The pole the feeding bag was hung from, and the feeding pump machine was hooked up too had brown-ish substances all around the pole and the black power cord. The Face of the feeding pump machine also on the left side had a reddish substance. The right side of the feeding pump machine had some black smeared substance. Underneath the feeding pump machine was a brown-ish substance. The facility failed to ensure the feeding pump machine in room [ROOM NUMBER]B was not covered with an unknown brown-ish substance. This deficient practice…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living receives the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for 2 (Resident #3 and Resident #6) of 5 residents reviewed for quality of life. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3 and Resident #6's fingernails were trimmed and cleaned. This failure could place residents who were dependent on staff for ADL care at risk for loss of dignity, risk of infection, and decreased quality of life. Findings include: Resident #3 Record review of Resident #3's face sheet dated 08/05/24, revealed, admission on [DATE] to the facility. Record review of Resident #3's outside facility history and physical dated 05/31/24, revealed, an [AGE] year-old male diagnosed with muscle wasting, lack of coordination, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, and anxiety. Record review of Resident #3's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], revealed severely impaired…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-05 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — pattern
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide foot care and treatment, or assist the resident in making appointments with a qualified person for 2 (Resident #3 and Resident #6) of 5 residents reviewed for quality of life. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3 and Resident #6's toenails were trimmed and cleaned, or podiatry appointments scheduled. This failure could place residents at risk of infection or mobility issues. Findings include: Resident #3 Record review of Resident #3's face sheet dated 08/05/24, revealed, admission on [DATE] to the facility. Record review of Resident #3's outside facility history and physical dated 05/31/24, revealed, an [AGE] year-old male diagnosed with muscle wasting, lack of coordination, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, and anxiety. Record review of Resident #3's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], revealed severely impaired cognition to be able to recall and make daily decisions as evidence by a BIMS score of 4. ADLs for personal hygiene…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-05 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that the assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 (Resident #7) of 5 resident reviewed for accuracy of MDS assessment, in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #7's quarterly MDS accurately reflected the residents' history of falls. This deficient practice could affect residents at the facility who had been assessed for risk of falls and could contribute to inadequate care. Findings included: Record review of Resident #7's face sheet dated 08/01/24, revealed, admission on [DATE] and re-admission on [DATE] to the facility. Record review of Resident #7's facility history and physical dated 05/29/24, revealed, an [AGE] year-old male diagnosed with Alzheimer's Disease, difficulty in walking, muscle wasting, muscle weakness, Dementia, lack of coordination, unspecified fall. Record review of Resident #7's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], revealed severely impaired cognition to be able to recall or make daily decision with a BIMS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and time frames to meet a resident medical and nursing needs to be furnished to attain or maintain the residents highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 (Resident #7) of 5 residents reviewed for care plans in that: The facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for Resident #7's history of falls needing to have a fall mat placed when in bed as per physician orders. This deficient practice could place residents in the facility at risk of not receiving the necessary care or services and having personalized plans developed to address their needs. Findings include: Record review of Resident #7's face sheet dated 08/01/24, revealed an admission on [DATE] and re-admission on [DATE] to the facility. Record review of Resident #7's facility history and physical dated 05/29/24, revealed, an [AGE] year-old…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that the residents environment remains free of accidents hazards as is possible and each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 (Resident #7) of 4 residents reviewed for accidents. The facility failed to follow the physicians order to place a fall mat on the floor when Resident #7 remains in bed. This failure could place residents in the facility at risk of not receiving the necessary care of services as ordered by the physician to address their needs, resulting in accidents, falls, and potential harm. Findings include: Record review of Resident #7's face sheet dated 08/01/24, revealed, admission on [DATE] and re-admission on [DATE] to the facility. Record review of Resident #7's facility history and physical dated 05/29/24, revealed, an [AGE] year-old male diagnosed with Alzheimer's Disease, difficulty in walking, muscle wasting, muscle weakness, Dementia, lack of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for sanitation and food storage. The facility failed to keep refrigerator and dry storage free of moldy foods. The facility failed to keep the freezers clean. The facility failed to store food in sealed containers. The facility failed to keep one plastic container stored on a metal rack clean and free of dried food residues on its side. The facility failed to keep one plastic bag with 2 bottles of liquid caramel stored on a metal rack clean and free of food drippings. The caramel stored inside the bag had leaked to the floor. The facility failed to properly store cleaning chemicals. This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk of food borne illness. Findings include: Observation and interview with DM N on 06/18/2024 at 8:26 AM, revealed a pink stain of frozen liquid at the bottom of the freezer #2. DM N said that it looked like strawberry drippings and that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-20 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain all mechanical, electrical, and patient care equipment in safe operating condition for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for safe operating equipment in safe operating condition. -The facility failed to maintain the stove in operational condition. -The facility failed to maintain the freezer in operational condition. This failure could place residents at risk of foodborne illnesses; and potential for injury to residents and staff by not maintaining essential equipment in safe operating condition. Findings include: Observation and interview on 06/18/24 at 8:22 AM, with the DM N revealed that freezer #2 had condensation inside and that the bottom was frozen and had a thick layer of ice. In the ice, there were pieces of cardboard from the boxes stored at the bottom of the freezer and food particles that were stuck in the ice. DM N said he would place a work order with the maintenance department so they could repair the freezer The Surveyor asked DM N what was the procedure that he needed to follow to place a work…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-20 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the resident had the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for 5 of 18 residents (Resident #7, #8, #14, #51 and Resident #65) reviewed for activities of daily living., received reasonable accommodation of needs. The facility failed to place Residents #7, #8, #14 and #51's call lights within reach. The facility failed to ensure Resident #65's room door was closing properly. This deficient practice could affect all residents who need assistance with activities of daily living of not having needs met. Findings included: RESIDENT #7 Record review of Resident #7's face sheet dated 06/18/2024 revealed he was [AGE] years old, was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #7's History and Physical dated 10/13/2023 revealed he had diagnoses including cerebral palsy and seizures. Record review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical and nursing needs identified in the comprehensive assessment for two (Resident #59 and Resident #61) of 23 residents reviewed for comprehensive resident-centered care plans. The facility failed to include care plans to address Resident #59's limited range of motion of his upper and lower extremities. The facility failed to include care plans to address Resident #61's limited range of motion of his upper and lower extremities. This failure put residents at increased risk of being unable to maintain their highest practicable physical well-being. Findings included: Resident #59 Record review of Resident #59's face sheet dated 06/19/2024 revealed he was [AGE] years old and was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #59's admission MDS dated [DATE] revealed he was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-20 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure all residents were provided, based on the preferences of each resident, an ongoing program to support residents in their choice of activities, both facility sponsored activities and individual activities, designed to meet the interests and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident for 2 of 9 (Resident #65 and Resident #51) residents reviewed for activities. The facility failed to provide regular, individualized activities to Resident #65 and Resident #51. This failure placed residents at risk of decreased physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings included: Resident #51 Record review of Resident #51 ' s face sheet dated 06/18/24 revealed an [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #51 ' s history and physical dated 07/11/23 revealed a diagnoseis of weakness, pain, history of falls, cerebral edema, and concussion with loss of consciousness…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-20 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident's medical records were complete and accurately documented in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices for 5 (Resident #1, #57, #59, #61 and #65) of 23 residents reviewed for advance directives. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #1, #57, #59, #61, and #65's Texas OOH DNR were completed correctly. This failure put residents at risk of not having their health care wishes honored, such as receiving unwanted resuscitative measures. Findings included: Resident #57 Record review of Resident #57's face sheet dated [DATE] revealed he was [AGE] years old, was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #57's History and Physical dated [DATE] revealed he had diagnoses including severe traumatic brain injury, Tracheotomy status (tube into the neck for breathing), Gastrostomy status (tube into the stomach for nutrition), Encounter for palliative care (care focused…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-20 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to implement written policies that prohibit and prevent abuse for 1 of 7 Resident #8) residents reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to implement their abuse policy when they failed to immediately suspend the Driver after Resident #8 ' s allegation of mistreatment was reported. This failure could place residents at risk of potential continued mistreatment and abuse. Findings included: Record review of Resident #8 ' s face sheet dated 06/19/24 revealed an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and she was her own responsible party. Record review of Resident #8 ' s history and physical dated 11/07/23 revealed diagnoses of diabetes mellitus type 2, kidney stones, chronic pain, restless leg syndrome, physical debility, and depression. Record review of Resident #8 ' s quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 10, indicating her cognitive was intact. Record review of Resident #8 ' s nursing progress note dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-20 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents are given the appropriate treatment and services to maintain or improve his or her ability to carry out the activities of daily living (ADLs) for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #26) reviewed for meal assistance. The facility failed to encourage Resident #26 often during her meal per her care plan. This failure could place residents that needed encouragement to eat to maintain ADL independence at risk of possible weight loss and avoid ADL decline. Findings included: Record review of Resident #26 ' s face sheet dated 06/19/24 revealed an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #26 ' s history and physical dated 05/20/24 revealed a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease, anorexia, cognitive communication deficit, and unspecified dementia. Record review of Resident #26 ' s annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 04, her cognitive was severely impaired and required…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #15) reviewed for nail care. The facility failed to trim Resident #15 ' s fingernails. This failure could place residents at risk of cross contamination and skin scratches that could result in infection. Findings include: Record review of Resident #15 ' s face sheet dated 06/19/24 revealed an [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #15 ' s history and physical dated 08/02/23 revealed a diagnosis of anemia, type 2 diabetes mellitus, Alzheimer ' s dementia, and hypertensive heart disease. Record review of Resident #15 ' s annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 04, his cognitive was severely impaired and required substantial/maximal assistance with hygiene. Record review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-20 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents did not receive psychotropic drugs on a PRN basis for more than 14 days for one (Resident #61) of three residents reviewed for PRN psychotropic medication orders exceeding 14 days. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #61 did not have a PRN order for Lorazepam (antianxiety medication) for more than 14 days. This failure could place residents at risk of side effects from receiving unnecessary psychotropic medications. Findings included: Record review of Resident #61's face sheet dated 06/19/2024 revealed he was [AGE] years old, was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #61's Progress Note dated 02/07/2024 revealed he had a diagnosis of anxiety disorder. Record review of Resident #61's History and Physical dated 03/22/2024 revealed no diagnosis of anxiety disorder. Record review of Resident #61's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed he was receiving…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 (Residents #47 and #63) of 18 residents reviewed for infection control in that: The facility failed to ensure CNA A wiped from front to back during incontinent care of Resident #47. The facility failed to ensure Resident #63's oxygen nasal cannula was bagged when not in use. These failures could place residents at risk for cross contamination and the spread of infection. Findings included: RESIDENT #47 Record review of Resident #47's admission record dated 06/19/2024 indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of heart failure, muscle wasting and atrophy. She was [AGE] years of age. Record review of Resident #47's MDS dated [DATE] revealed: BIMS = 13 indicating resident was cognitively intact. Bladder and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-16 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public. The facility did not ensure the floors and ceilings were not stained, floor tiles were not broken/missing, restroom faucet(s) had running water, restroom(s) light bulbs were not out, there was not a strong urine smell in B-Hall, in a living area there was not trash on the floor, the wall under the medical records room/oxygen room did not have a huge hole, and hot water was available in C-hall, Room B105 had wet urine in the restroom and in the room, strong urine smell, there was wet pieces of toilet paper all over the room. Medical Records room had a hole in the wall, resident phone room had a hole in the wall, D-Hall had broken tile on the floor. These failures placed residents and staff at risk of living, working, and visiting in an unsafe, unsanitary, and uncomfortable environment. Findings include: Record review of Resident #3's face…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 1 (Resident #10) of 6 residents reviewed for resident rights. -The facility failed to ensure Resident #10's bedroom was clean and comfortable based on a dead roach being inside the resident's bed light fixture. This failure could place the resident at risk of decreased quality of life due to the lack of a well-maintained environment. Findings included: Record review of Resident #10's face sheet dated 04/16/2024, revealed a [AGE] year-old male who was originally admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #10's H&P dated 06/25/2023, revealed Resident #10's diagnoses to include hypertension, gait abnormality/difficulty walking and depression. Record review of Resident #10's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score of 15 indicating the person is intact cognitively. During an observation and interview on 04/09/2024 at 3:30 p.m.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and time frames to meet a resident's medical and nursing needs and the services to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for care plans in that: The facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for Resident #1 requiring wearing cushion boots (redistributing device for the prevention of heel pressure ulcers). This deficient practice could place residents in the facility at risk of not receiving the necessary care or services and having personalized plans developed to address their needs. Findings include: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 04/11/24, revealed, admission on [DATE] to the facility. Record review of Resident #1's significant change in status MDS assessment dated [DATE],…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide the necessary treatment and services based on the comprehensive assessment and consistent with professional standards of practice to promote healing and prevent worsening of pressure injuries for 1 (Resident #3) of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility failed to provide proper wound care for Resident #1's facility acquired pressure ulcers to the right outer heel. This deficient practice could place residents at risk for worsening pressure injuries, pain, and a decline in health. Findings include: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 04/11/24, revealed, admission on [DATE] to the facility. Record review of Resident #1's significant change in status MDS assessment dated [DATE], revealed, he was cognitively intact to be able to make daily decisions and able to recall information with a BIMS (tool used to screen and identify the cognitive condition of residents upon admission into a long-term care facility)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-16 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews the facility failed to dispose of garbage and refuse properly for 2 (Dumpsters #1 and #2) of 2 dumpsters located outside of the facility. -Two dumpsters located outside the facility were open with their sliding doors open when not in use and trash was on the ground. These failures could place residents at risk of decreased quality of life due to an exterior environment which could attract pests, rodents, and other animals. Findings included: Observation on 04/11/2024 at 11:15 a.m., two dumpsters were observed outside the facility on the back of the property. Dumpster #1 was observed with the sliding door open. There were several pieces of trash on the ground outside of the dumpster. Dumpster #2 was observed with the sliding door open with trash reaching the height of the side door. Observation on 04/11/2024 at 12:59 p.m., two dumpsters were observed outside the facility on the back of the property. Dumpsters #1 and #2 were both observed with sliding doors opened. There were several pieces of trash on the ground outside of Dumpster #1. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infection for 1 (Resident #11) of 6 residents reviewed for infection control. Resident #11's nasal cannula that was on the floor was placed back on Resident #11's nares (nostrils) without being replaced. This deficient practice could place residents at risk for infection due to improper care practices. Findings included: Record review of Resident #11's face sheet dated 04/11/2024, revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was originally admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #11's H&P dated 10/06/2023, revealed Resident #11's assessment included: Monitor O2 maintain adequate O2 saturation keep Sat>90%. Record review of Resident #11's MDS quarterly assessment dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score of 00 indicating severe…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 2 of 6 (Resident #1 and Resident #4) residents reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to clean urine off the floor for Resident #1 and Resident #4, leaving a strong urine odor penetrating the shared room. This failure could place residents at risk at a diminished quality of life. Findings include: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 10/10/23 revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia. Record review of Resident #1's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 05; indicating severe cognitive impairment. Record review of Resident #1's care plan dated 09/09/23 revealed focus area for incontinence for bladder and bowel and goal was for resident to be clean and odor free through next review date. Record review of Resident #4's face sheet dated 10/10/23 revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 6 (Resident #6) residents reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure CNA D removed gown and gloves before exiting Resident #6 room, who was in isolation with contact precautions. This failure could place residents at risk of cross contamination which could result infections or illness. Findings include: Record review of Resident #6's face sheet dated 10/10/23 revealed a [AGE] year-old male who was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of anxiety, Parkinson's disease (a brain disorder that causes unintended or uncontrollable movements, such as shaking, stiffness, and difficulty with balance and coordination), and metabolic encephalopathy (an alteration in consciousness caused due to brain dysfunction,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-11 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's medical record included documentation that indicates the residents received education on the influenza immunizations for 1 of 6 (Resident #2) residents reviewed for immunizations. 1. The facility failed to document that Resident #2 or was provided education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of the influenza immunization and if the resident either receive the influenza immunization This failure could place residents at risk for contracting a viral disease and cause respiratory complications, and potential adverse health outcomes. Findings include: Record review of Resident #2's face sheet dated 10/10/23 revealed a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of anxiety, hypertension (condition in which the force of the blood against the artery walls is too high), and atrial fibrillation (an irregular and often very rapid heart rhythm). Record review of Resident #2's admission MDS assessment dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-01 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that the facility was free of rodents/insects for one of four halls. A. The facility failed to ensure an effective pest control program was in place to keep cockroaches out of the facility. This failure could affect all residents by placing them at risk of potential spread of infection, cross-contamination, food-borne illness, and decreased quality of life. Findings included: Observation on 08/12/23 at 3:12 PM in hall A with LVN A. The roach was crossing the resident's room A117 on the other side of the hall. Observation and interview on 08/12/23 at 4:31 PM with Administrator in room A102, which was being used to store bed frames had to pieces of large roach wings. Administrator stated the roaches were bad months ago, but it had got better since then with minimal sightings of roaches. Observation on 08/13/23 at 9:14 AM in hallway A revealed a roach that was dead on the floor near a resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-01 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure medical records, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, were maintained on each resident that were accurately documented for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for medical records. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's assessments for the change of condition were accurately documented clinical record. This failure could place residents at risk of inaccurate records with the potential for inadequate care and treatment. Findings included: Closed record Review revealed Resident #1's face sheet dated 08/12/23 listed initial admission on [DATE] and readmission on [DATE]. Record Review Resident #1's history and physical dated 01/04/22 revealed a [AGE] year-old female. Past medical history multiple sclerosis, neurogenic bladder with chronic urinary tract infections due to intermittent catheterization. Record Review Resident #1's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed resident rarely made self-understood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-04-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infection for the facility residents reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to remove linen from the facility and maintain in a sanitary condition until wash. The facility failed to maintain equipment in working condition to sanitize linens. This deficient practice could have placed residents at risk for cross-contamination resulting in acquiring infections. Findings included: Observation and Interview on 04/24/23 at 2:41 PM with laundry aide N revealed 8 gray linen plastic bins stored outside the facility that contained soiled linen were uncovered. Laundry aide N reported the facility has 2 commercial washing machines and only one is working at this time. The facility had 3 commercial dryers, only one dryer is working at this time. Laundry Aid…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior for two (Halls C and D) of four halls reviewed for maintenance services and failed to maintain a safe environment on two halls (Halls A and B) of four halls reviewed for safe water temperatures. 1. Halls C and D had numerous unaddressed environmental issues including holes in walls, water leaks, collapsed ceilings, lose faucets, windowsill boards broken or cracked, restroom light fixture covers missing, closet doors missing or broken. 2. The hot water in the bathroom sink in room B19 measured 129.9 degrees. 3. The hot water in the bathroom sink in room B18 measured 135 degrees. 4. The hot water in A/B hall shower, Shower Stall One measured 124.8 degree 5. The hot water in A/B hall shower, Shower Stall Two measured 132.2 degrees. These failures could put…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to provide the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, personal and oral hygiene care for 2 (Resident #36 & Resident #43) of 20 residents reviewed for ADL care. The facility failed to ensure facility staff provided showers and personal grooming for Resident # 36 and Resident #43. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving assistance with personal care which could cause pain, skin breakdown, and low self-esteem. Findings included: Resident #36 Record review of Resident #36's Face Sheet revealed admission on [DATE] and readmission on [DATE] to the facility. Record review of Resident #36's facility diagnosis report dated 04/27/2023 revealed a diagnosis dementia and lack of coordination. Record review of Resident #36's MDS quarterly dated 01/31/2023 revealed a brief interview mental status score of 7, ADLs of 3 extensive assistance with a one-person assistance with personal hygiene, diagnosis of Aphasia,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care is provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice for 3 (Resident #1, Resident #59, and Resident #132) of 7 residents observed for oxygen management. The Facility failed to ensure Resident #1, Resident #59, and Resident #132 who were on oxygen therapy to post oxygen signs outside the entrance of their room doors. This failure could place residents on oxygen therapy at risk of receiving incorrect or inadequate oxygen support, decline in health, and expose them to oxygen hazards without oxygen signs being posted outside of their rooms. Findings included: Resident #1 Record review of Resident #1's Face Sheet revealed admission on [DATE] to the facility. Record review of Resident #1's MDS quarterly dated 02/05/2023, had a brief interview for mental status score of 07, diagnoses of non-Alzheimer's dementia, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or chronic lung…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on the observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 (kitchen) of 1 reviewed for residents. 1. Food products in dry storage, freezer, and in refrigerator were not correctly labeled, wrapped, or were expired. This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk of food borne illness. Findings included: Observation and Interview on 04/24/2023 beginning at 8:15 AM Assistant Dietary Manager in dry storage revealed a 7 pound can of pudding that did not have a date, breadcrumbs in a sealed zip lock bag did not an expiration date, a tied bag of pasta that was opened did was not labeled with the date and name, a sealed bag of enriched quick creamy wheat did not have an expiration date, and thick n easy ensures that were not labeled and dated. Assistant Dietary Manager stated the Dietary Manager and himself oversee food items are being labeled and dated. Assistant Dietary Manager stated the risk of not labeling or dating or correctly labeling food…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-27 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — pattern
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on the observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to dispose of garbage and refuse properly for 2 (Dumpster #1 & Dumpster #2) of 2 dumpsters reviewed for food safety requirements. 1. Two dumpsters outside in the back of the facility had trash around the dumpsters on the ground. 2. Two dumpsters were uncovered. This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk of illnesses, or be provided an unsafe, unsanitary, and uncomfortable environment. Findings included: Observation and Interview on 04/24/2023 beginning at 8:15 AM with Assistant Dietary Manager, revealed were two dumpsters in the back of the building near the kitchen door. Dumpster #1 nearest to the building had trash hanging off the side and from the front. The side door was not closed all the way exposing the trash inside and trash (napkins/BBQ sauce container) sat on the dumpster rail. On the ground were blue and clear medical gloves, a clear bag that had briefs in it, and next to it was an empty 5-gallon blue bucket lying on its side. There were pieces (medical gloves, spoons, napkins)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility filed to ensure resident records were readily accessible for two (Resident #31 and #131) of six residents reviewed for record accessibility. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #31 and #131's completed TX OOH DNR forms were in either their electronic or physical charts. This failure could result in staff having difficulty locating resident's TX OOH DNR forms and cause a delay in residents receiving desired treatment. Findings included: Record review of Resident #31's face sheet dated 4/26/2023 documented that she was [AGE] years old and was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #31's electronic diagnoses listing accessed 04/26/2023 documented that she had diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease. Record review of Resident #31's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] documented that she had a BIMS of 12 (Moderate cognitive impairment). Record review of Resident #31's care plan dated 05/20/2019 documented that Resident #31 had a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-27 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain essential mechanical and electrical equipment in safe operating condition for 1 facility of 1 reviewed for essential equipment. 1. The facility did not provide necessary repairs for 1 industrial washing machines, 2 industrial dryers, 1 washer soap dispenser, and 1 washer bleach dispenser. 2. 2 of 10 Resident beds in C Hallway had head and foot boards that were broken. 3. Resident #36 was sitting in his wheelchair with a broken footrest that had parts to the chair with sharp edges. This failure could place residents who had their clothes laundered by the facility at risk no having sufficient linen available to meet residents needs and place residents who use sleep on facility beds at risk for injury from lose head or foot boards that may fall on them or screws/bolts that my scratch or puncture them as they are lying or sitting down. Findings included: Interview with the Maintenance manager on 04/27/23 at 9:11 AM, he stated that he…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, observations, and record reviews the facility failed to promote care for residents in a manner and in an environment that maintained or enhanced dignity and respect for 1 (Resident #43) of 6 residents reviewed for care that maintained or enhanced their dignity. The facility failed to maintain Resident #43 sense of dignity by not proving the resident with a bath according to his bath schedule and changing his clothing to promote proper hygiene. This failure could place residents who require assistance with bathing and changing their clothing at risk of decreased self-esteem affecting their dignity. Findings included: Record Review of Resident #43 face sheet dated 04/25/23 is a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE]. Record Review of Resident #43 care plan dated 10/29/2019 revealed Resident #43 has an ADL self-care deficit related to a history of stroke, expressive aphasia, hemiplegia, and Parkinson's and required limited assistance x1 for bathing and changing. Record Review of Resident #43…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-27 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received parenteral fluids must be administered consistent with professional standards of practice and in accordance with physician orders for 1 (Resident #67) of 2 residents reviewed for Midline/PICC (Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter) care. The facility failed to ensure Resident # 67's midline (intravenous catheter) tubing was changed every 72 hours or sooner if contamination was suspected or integrity of system was compromised from 04/19/2023 to 04/27/2023. Resident 67's midline site was not changed as ordered by the physician, and care to the site was not completed every 24 hours. This failure placed residents at risk of developing an infection. Findings included: Record review of Resident #67's Face Sheet revealed admission [DATE] and readmission on [DATE] to the facility. Record review of Resident #67's MDS quarterly dated 04/06/2023 revealed a brief interview mental status score of 15, diagnosis of urinary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2023-04-27 · tag F0577 — widespread
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that resident had the right to examine the results of the most recent survey of the facility conducted by Federal or State surveyors and any plan of correction in effect with respect to the facility for all facility residents (81) and their families. The facility failed to make the results of the most recent survey of the facility available to residents, and family members and legal representatives of residents. This failure placed residents and family members and legal representatives of residents at risk of not being able to fully exercise their rights to be informed of the facility's survey citation history. Findings included: In a group interview on 04/25/2023 at 2:00 PM three of ten anonymous residents interviewed did not know they could review past survey reports or where these survey reports could be found. Observation on 04/27/2023 at 5:20 PM in the facility reception area revealed a sign stating Survey Results with a document holder containing a folder and a binder. Record review of all the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$20,312 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $20,312 — penalty dated 2023-09-01
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-10-04 for 8 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ADVANCED HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS — 28 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.9-1.9 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.8-0.8 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 52.0-1.0 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 54.0-1.0 vs chain
The other 27 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Advanced Health & Rehab Center of GarlandGarland, TX 1 of 5Advanced Rehabilitation and Healthcare of AthensAthens, TX 1 of 5Greenville Health & Rehabilitation CenterGreenville, TX 1 of 5Tomball Rehab & NursingTomball, TX 1 of 5Winfield Rehab & NursingCrockett, TX 2 of 5Advanced Rehabilitation & Healthcare of BurlesonBurleson, TX 2 of 5Balch Springs Nursing HomeBalch Springs, TX 2 of 5Henderson Health & Rehabilitation CenterHenderson, TX 2 of 5Heritage House at Paris Rehab & NursingParis, TX 2 of 5McAllen Nursing CenterMcAllen, TX 3 of 5Clarksville Nursing CenterClarksville, TX 3 of 5Palo Pinto Nursing CenterMineral Wells, TX 3 of 5Prairie House Living CenterPlainview, TX 3 of 5Santa Fe Health & Rehabilitation CenterWeatherford, TX 3 of 5Sulphur Springs Health And RehabilitationSulphur Springs, TX 3 of 5The Renaissance At Kessler ParkDallas, TX 3 of 5Whitehall Rehab & NursingCrockett, TX 3 of 5Willow Rehab & NursingKilgore, TX 4 of 5Advanced Rehabilitation And Healthcare Of VernonVernon, TX 4 of 5Advanced Rehabilitation and Healthcare of WichitaWichita Falls, TX 4 of 5Crowell Nursing CenterCrowell, TX 4 of 5Mesquite Tree Nursing CenterMesquite, TX 4 of 5Whispering Oaks Rehab & NursingCuero, TX 5 of 5Advanced Rehabilitation And Healthcare Of BowieBowie, TX 5 of 5Clyde Nursing CenterClyde, TX 5 of 5Heritage House At Keller Rehab & NursingKeller, TX 5 of 5Seymour Rehabilitation And HealthcareSeymour, TX

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
BOWERS, SEANIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 07/01/2024
CISNEROS, ALFREDIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 02/18/2008
COBB, TRAVISIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 11/11/2022
COOPER, STEPHENIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 11/11/2022
HARDIN, SHERRIEIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 09/04/2024
KERZEE, RICHARDIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 09/24/2007
KORENEK, PATRICIAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 05/05/2018
SOECHTING, PAULIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 11/22/2024
STRACK, JOEIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 02/11/2022
HUGGINS, LINDAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 02/23/2024
WILLIG, ZACHARYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 02/23/2024
THOMPSON, JOHNNYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024
EL PASO VII ENTERPRISES, L.L.C.OrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/23/2024
BLAKE, GARYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/23/2023
BLAKE, MALISAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/23/2024
EL PASO VII REALTY, L.L.C.OrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/23/2024
BARRETT, LISAIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 02/23/2024
CABRERA, KRISHNAIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 03/26/2025
EAMIGUEL, CHRISTOPHERIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 02/23/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 22 rows in the source record cover these 19 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-3.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$76K
Related-party expense1% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 63%Medicare 4%Other / private 33%

This home reported $76K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$265per resident / day
operating cost
$8,055per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$255per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Texas
$5,627/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,666/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 455935. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-07, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next