Advanced Health & Rehab Center of Garland
1201 Colonel Drive, Garland, TX 75043 · Government - Hospital district · 139 certified beds · (972) 278-3566 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Feb 2026
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567)
- inspectors cited 4 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (41) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $181,828 in federal fines (most recent 2026-01-05)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 9.4% | 15.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.3% | 3.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.2% | 0.8% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.3% | 2.4% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.3% | 3.3% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 7.3% | 14.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 10.6% | 18.0% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 93.0% | 98.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.2% | 3.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 7.4% | 13.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 5.1% | 9.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.7% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 51.9% | 88.0% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 24.8% | 25.7% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 17.2% | 12.3% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.94 | 2.17 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.75 | 2.06 | 1.80 | typical |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
50.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 36 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 67.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 34 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.17 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 16% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 50.2%CMS range 39.1–66.4 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.9%CMS range 6.6–16.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 67.7% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 61.8% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 64.7% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 85.4% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 4.2% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.1% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.1%CMS range 3.6–12.1 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.23 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 139 beds and averages 122.9 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.97 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.33 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.77 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.68 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.09 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.38 to 0.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
41 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 27 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents for one of five residents (Resident #1) reviewed for assistive devices and supervision. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was provided increased supervision, due to psychiatric issues, Mild intellectual disability, and Diabetes. In addition, she resided on the memory care unit prior to going to the appointment 01/05/2026. Resident #1 was not returned to the memory care unit upon returning from the elopement incident. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was identified on 01/08/2026. While the IJ was removed on 01/09/2026, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated with a potential for more than minimal harm due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems.This failure could place all residents who requiring supervision in the community due to physical and/or cognitive deficits at risk for emotional…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2026-01-05 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — patternProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and observations, the facility failed to ensure that pain management was provided to residents who require such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for pain management. The facility failed to provide Resident #1, who was on hospice services for end-stage cancer to the breast, liver, bone, and bile ducts, with effective pain management from 12/26/25 through 01/04/26. The facility did not reevaluate, advocate, or provide the full amount of pain medication available as allowed by physician's orders for appropriate pain management. This failure resulted in Resident #1 exhibiting non-verbal signs of excruciating pain to include screaming during care, crying, thrashing/writing in bed, and moaning. An IJ was identified on 01/04/26. The IJ Template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 5:15 PM. While the IJ was removed on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2025-09-12 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure when there is a transfer or discharge of resident under any of the circumstances specified in paragraphs (c)(1)(i)(A) through (F) of this section, the facility must ensure that the transfer or discharge appropriate information is communicated to the receiving health care institution; and the facility failed to provide and document sufficient preparation and orientation in a form and manner the resident could understand for one (Resident #1) of five residents reviewed for hospital transfers. 1. The facility sent Resident #1, who they indicated was having a behavioral emergency (pulling on his g-tube, ostomy and catheter) and was in danger of dislodging them, in a private non-medical transport vehicle and left him without facility staff or a family member to supervise him while in the ER waiting area.2. The facility failed to notify and coordinate with Resident #1's RP prior to sending him out to the ER, which did not allow the RP to select the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-12-02 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that each resident received necessary respiratory care and services that is in accordance with professional standards of practice, the resident's care plan and the residents' choice for 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) of 8 residents reviewed for respiratory care. 1. On [DATE] RN H failed to obtain a physician's order to administer oxygen to Resident #1 when readmitted to the facility after an acute care hospital stay with the primary diagnoses of Acute on Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia (a worsening of chronic respiratory failure that can lead to hypoxia [low blood oxygen]); COPD; and CHF. 2. The facility failed to provide appropriate dispensing of oxygen by providing Resident #1 oxygen via nasal cannula (usually delivers oxygen up to 1-6 liters per minute) at levels that ranged from 7 LPM - 10 LPM on [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], and [DATE]. On [DATE], LVN A failed to accurately assess for a respiratory…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-05 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from types of abuse: mental abuse/verbal abuse/physical abuse/sexual abuse/deprivation of goods and services by facility staff for 1 resident (Resident #5) out of 10 residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. The facility failed to ensure Resident #5 was free from abuse when CNA-C spanked him twice on his bottom while he was lying on the floor on 3/13/2025. This failure could place residents at risk of being physically or emotionally abused.Record Review of Resident #5's face sheet revealed he was an [AGE] year-old male and was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE]. His diagnoses included: Alzheimer's Disease (a progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions), Difficulty in Walking, Major Depressive Disorder (characterized by a persistent, intense, and low mood, along with a loss of interest in activities), Repeated falls, Abnormalities of Gait and Mobility,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for each resident that included describing the services to be furnished to attain or maintain measurable objectives to meet the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, for one (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed for care plans, in that: Resident #1's care plan did not address her behaviors of wandering, intellectual disability, or her most recent elopement incident. This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk of not receiving individualized care and services to meet their needs. Record review of Resident face sheet dated 01/07/2026, reflected she was a 57 years-old, female that was admitted on [DATE]. Resident DX: Schizoaffective Disorder (a serious mental illness (psychosis like hallucinations/delusions) with a mood disorder (major depression or bipolar disorder), featuring periods of psychotic symptoms.) Diabetes Mellitus (changes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-05 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident that includes the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meets professional standards of quality care for 1 of 10 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for baseline care plans. The facility failed to develop a baseline care plan within 48 hours of Resident #1's admission to the facility on [DATE] that addressed the resident's pain management needs while on hospice services for an end-stage diagnoses of malignant cancer of the breast, liver, bone, and bile ducts. As a result, she experienced on-going, excruciating pain from 12/26/25-01/04/26. This failure could place residents at risk of not having their individual care needs met in a timely manner, diminished quality of life, and unnecessary pain and suffering.Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 01/04/26 reflected a [AGE] year-old female with diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assured the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for pharmaceutical services. MA T failed to supervise Resident #2 after she left the resident's medications in his room during morning medication administration on 01/04/26. This failure could place the residents at risk of not receiving medications as ordered by the physician. Findings included: Record review of Resident #2's Face Sheet, dated 01/04/26, reflected the resident was an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Record review of the Resident #2's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 11/11/25, reflected the resident had diagnoses of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (Progressive lung condition coughing airflow blockage), Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypercapnia (Respiratory issues…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an Infection Prevention and Control Program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 5 of 6 residents (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, and Resident #5) observed for infection control. 1. The facility failed to ensure CNA C sufficiently performed hand hygiene during incontinent care of Resident #1 on 11/05/2025. 2. The facility failed to ensure CNA B sufficiently performed hand hygrine during incontinent care of Resident #2 on 11/05/2025. 3. The facility failed to ensure LVN F performed hand hygiene prior to entering room and making resident contact to Resident #3 on 11/06/2025. 4. The facility failed to ensure LVN G performed hand hygiene prior to contact with Resident #1, Resident #4, and Resident #5 on 11/06/2025. These failures could place the residents at risk of cross-contamination and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan to include measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for each resident for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for Comprehensive Care Plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 had comprehensive care plan identified to reflect his transfer requirement of a hydraulic lift and transfer device. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure CNA A used two people during a hydraulic lift and transfer device when she obtained the weight of Resident #2 on 10/02/2025. This failure could place residents at risk for comprehensive care plans that do not meet the resident's customized mobility needs, which could result in accidents, serious injuries, and/or death while at the facility.Findings included:Record review of Resident #2's Face Sheet dated 11/05/2025 at 10:44 AM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-26 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents with pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing for one of five residents (Resident #1) reviewed for Wound Care treatment and services. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's wounds were dressed and covered while at the facility. These failures could place the residents at risk for the development or worsening of pressure wounds, cross contamination and infections. Findings Included:Record review of Resident #1's Face Sheet dated 11/06/2025 at 11:35 AM revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted from an acute care hospital on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included: heart failure (decrease in heart circulation, major depressive disorder (mood disorder that causes persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), Alzheimer's disease (degenerative cognitive decline), vascular…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent any risk of hazards and/or accidents for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for accidents and supervision. The facility failed to ensure CNA A used two staff members during a hydraulic lift transfer when she obtained the weight of Resident #2 on 10/02/2025. The failure could place residents at risk for accidents and injuries, limiting their quality of life.Findings included: Record review of Resident #2's Face Sheet dated 11/05/2025 10:44 AM revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted from an acute care hospital. Relevant diagnoses included cerebrovascular disease (group of conditions that affect blood flow to the brain,) hemiplegia of right side (right side paralysis,) Peripheral Vascular Disease (narrowing, blockage, or spasms in blood vessels that lead to restricted blood flow to the limbs,) dementia (decline in cognitive function,) major depressive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needed respiratory care was provided such care, consistent with the comprehensive care plan and professional standards of practice, for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3's oxygen tubing was positioned off the floor and was unencumbered from the bedside table. This failure placed residents at risk of not receiving safe and sufficient respiratory care. Findings Included: Record review of Resident #3's Face Sheet dated 11/07/2025 at 9:04 AM revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted from an acute care hospital on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included cerebral infarction (blood clot that deprives brain cells of oxygen,) venous thrombosis (formation of blood clot) and embolism (blood clot that blocks the artery to the lungs,) and tracheostomy (surgically created opening in the windpipe/trachea). Record review of Resident #3's MDS dated [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-25 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — patternMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident call system was accessible to allow residents to call for staff assistance through a communication system which relays the call directly to a staff member of to a centralized staff area for four of ten residents (Residents #1, #2, #3, and #4) reviewed for reasonable accommodation of needs. The facility failed to ensure the call light system in Residents #1, #2, #3, and #4's rooms were in a position that was accessible to the residents on 09/25/25. This failure could place the residents at risk of being unable to obtain assistance when needed and help in the event of an emergency.Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #1's Face Sheet, dated 09/25/25, reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included muscle weakness and unsteadiness on feet. Record review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 7/24/25, reflected a BIMS score of 00 (severe cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 27 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-25 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident free from physical restraints not required to treat the residents' medical symptoms as was possible for one of five residents (Resident #1) reviewed for physical restraints. The facility failed to ensure Residents #1 had physician orders or a physician assessment for the bolster mattress on her bed. This failure could place residents at risk of not having an environment that was free of restraints which could result in injury.Findings include: Record review of Resident #1's Face Sheet, dated 09/25/25, reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included muscle weakness and unsteadiness on feet. Record review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 7/24/25, reflected she had a BIMS score of 00 (severe cognitive impairment). For ADL care, it reflected the resident required extensive assistance and an active diagnosis of muscle weakness. Record review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Findings included: Record review of Resident #5's Face Sheet, dated 09/30/25, reflected he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included schizoaffective disorder (psychotic symptoms) and vascular dementia (memory loss). Record review of Resident #5's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 9/194/25, reflected he had a BIMS score of 13 (intact cognitive response). Active diagnoses included schizophrenia and altered mental status. Record review of Resident #5's Comprehensive Care Plan, dated 8/19/25, reflected the resident required psychotropic medication. Record review of Resident #5's physician's orders, dated 9/30/25, reflected the resident was prescribed the following medication: Ativan Oral tablet 1 MG, give 1 mg by mouth every 8 hours as needed for agitation. Atorvastatin Calcium oral tablet 20 mg, give 1 tablet by mouth in the morning for high cholesterol. Divalproex Sodium oral tablet delayed release 500 mg, give 1 tablet two times a day for mood stabilizer. Ferrous…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-12 · tag F0620 — isolatedNot require residents to give up Medicare or Medicaid benefits, or pay privately as a condition of admission; and must tell residents what care they do not provide.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to establish and implement an admissions policy for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for admissions.The facility did not provide Resident #1 and his RP with a written admission agreement, consent to treat, resident rights notification, Medicare/Medicaid information or disclosure of services and charges at the time of admission. This failure placed residents at risk of receiving care and services without informed consent, being uninformed of rights and financial obligations and not knowing how to exercise Medicare/Medicaid protections.Findings included:Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 08/26/25 reflected he was a 71 year old male admitted on [DATE]. His active diagnoses included nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage (bleeding within the brainstem), anxiety disorder (mental health condition causing agitation), colostomy status (surgical opening in the colon for stool elimination), urinary retention with catheter use (inability to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-10 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for 5 of 34 (Residents #31, #49, #64, #17, and #107) residents reviewed for reasonable accommodation of needs. The facility failed to ensure the call light system in Resident #31, #49, #64, #17, and #107's rooms were in a position that was accessible to the residents. This failure could place the residents at risk of being unable to obtain assistance when needed and help in the event of an emergency. The findings included: Resident #31 Record review of Resident #31's Face Sheet, dated 04/10/2025, reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #31's diagnoses included congestive heart failure (a weakened heart condition that causes fluid buildup in body tissues) and difficulty in walking. Record review of Resident #31's Quarterly MDS (assessment used to determine…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely for 10 of 15 resident rooms in the memory care unit (Resident room [ROOM NUMBER], #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, and #10) reviewed for environment. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident room [ROOM NUMBER], #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, and #10, in the memory care unit, were thoroughly cleaned and sanitized. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of living in an unclean and unsanitary environment which could lead to a decreased quality of life. Findings include: An observation on 04/08/25 at 10:24 AM of resident room [ROOM NUMBER] reflected the air condition unit in the room had thick black and brown dirt along and between the vents. The bathroom sink faucet had brownish stains along the base of the faucet. The floor of the shower area had brown…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distributed, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for the facility's only kitchen, reviewed for food and nutrition services. 1. The facility failed to ensure the ice machine in the facility kitchen was thoroughly cleaned. 2. The facility failed to ensure kitchen cooking equipment was cleaned. 3. The facility failed to place a cover on top of the tea dispenser to avoid air borne contaminants. 4. The facility failed to ensure foods in the refrigerator was sealed from air-borne contaminants. 5. The facility failed to ensure the storage bins in the dry food area was clean and covered from air-borne contaminants. These failures could place residents at risk for cross contamination and other air-borne illnesses. Findings include: Observations on 04/08/25 from 9:08 AM to 9:15 AM in the facility's only kitchen revealed: The ice machine, located in the kitchen had white stains inside the walls of the machine and light brownish stains on the inside of the door.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an Infection Prevention and Control Program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for two of twelve (Resident #97 and Resident #102) residents reviewed for infection control. 1. The facility failed to ensure RN C removed her gloves and performed hand hygiene before using the laptop on the medication cart outside of Resident #97's room on 04/08/2025. 2. The facility failed to ensure Medication Aide F removed her gloves and performed hand hygiene before using the laptop on the medication cart outside of Resident #102's room on 04/09/2025. This failure could place residents at risk of cross-contamination and development of infections. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #97's Face Sheet, dated 04/10/2025, reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights set forth that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for a resident for one (Resident #17) of six residents reviewed for Care Plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #17's treatment for Dermatitis was care planned. This failure could place the resident at risk of not receiving the necessary care and services needed. Findings included: Record review of Resident #17's Face Sheet, dated 04/09/25, reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included skin changes, Alzheimer's (memory loss), and Basal Cell Carcinoma of skin (skin cancer). Record review of Resident #17's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/15/25, reflected she had a BIMS score of 15…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biological were stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for 1 (hall 200 medication cart) of 4 medication carts reviewed for medication storage. The facility failed to dispose of one bottle of Magnesium Oxide (vitamin supplement), which expired January of 2025, from the Hall 200 medication cart on 04/09/2025. This failure could place residents at risk of receiving medications which might not provide the full therapeutic benefits of the medication or possibly cause side effects. The findings included: During an observation and interview 04/09/2025 at 11:15 AM, a bottle of expired Magnesium Oxide 400 milligrams was in the medication aide cart on hall 200. The expiration date printed on the bottle was 01/2025. Medication Aide F stated she was not aware the bottle of medication on the cart was expired. Medication Aide F stated no resident on her hall currently had an order for the medication. She stated expired medication should not be given to residents because it…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-16 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to immediately inform the resident, consult with the resident's physician, and notify, consistent with his or her authority, the resident representative when there was a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status that was, a deterioration in health, mental, or psychosocial status in either life-threatening conditions or clinical complications for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for Notification of Changes. The facility failed to notify Resident#1's durable power of attorney for healthcare when Resident#1 missed a scheduled dialysis appointment on 03/07/25. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving treatment when there was a change in their condition, which could lead to worsening of conditions and serious injury or harm. Findings include: Record review of Resident#1 face sheet, dated, 03/12/25, revealed an 84 -year-old male, originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-03 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — patternHonor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility who acts as the fiduciary of the residents' fund, failed to hold, safeguard, manage and account for the personal funds of the resident deposited with the facility, to include the right to know, in advance, what charges a facility may impose against a resident's personal funds for one (Resident #3) of three residents reviewed for trust fund management. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3's trust fund account was spent down to avoid being over the amount allowed to have Medicaid Insurance benefits. These failures could place residents whose funds were managed by the facility at risk of losing their Medicaid insurance benefits and placed the residents' funds at risk of being misappropriated and residents/RP's not being aware of the residents' financial situation. Findings Included: Record review of Resident #3's Face Sheet (dated 09/06/24) reflected he was [AGE] year old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #3's active diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-03 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for two (Residents #7 and #9) of eight residents reviewed for medications and pharmacy services. 1. The facility failed to take Resident #7's blood pressure and administer her medication in accordance with the physician orders. Resident #7 was not administered Metoprolol Tartrate (beta blocker to treat high blood pressure) on 08/20/24, 08/21/24 and 08/28/24 due to her blood pressure being out of parameters. However, there was no documented evidence to indicate her blood pressure was taken in her clinical record to validate the medication was not warranted. 2. The facility failed to take Resident #9's blood glucose and administer his sliding scale insulin Novolin in accordance with the physician orders. Resident #9 was did not have his blood glucose checked…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-03 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident that are complete; accurately documented; readily accessible; and systematically organized for two (Resident #4 and Resident #5) of four residents reviewed for pressure ulcers and non-pressure wounds. 1. The facility failed to document wound care was provided for Resident #4 in August 2024 on 29 occasions. 2. The facility failed to document wound care was provided for Resident #5 in August 2024 on 36 occasions. The facility failure could place residents at risk of not receiving wound care, wounds worsening and a lack of oversight of their clinical records by the nursing staff and nursing management. Findings included: 1.Record review of Resident #4's Face Sheet dated 08/29/24 reflected he was a [AGE] year old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #4's active diagnoses included in part, quadriplegia (paralysis of all four limbs),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-03 · tag F0661 — isolatedEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a discharge summary that included, (i) A recapitulation of the resident's stay that includes, but is not limited to, diagnoses, course of illness/treatment or therapy, and pertinent lab, radiology, and consultation results; (ii) A final summary of the resident's status; (iii) Reconciliation of all pre-discharge medications with the resident's post-discharge medications (both prescribed and over-the-counter) for one (Residents #6) of two residents reviewed for discharge planning. The facility failed to complete a discharge summary for Resident #6 when she had a planned discharge home. This failure could place residents at risk of a recapitulation of the stay being unavailable to help ensure continuity of care once they went back home. Findings included: Record review of Resident #6's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected she was a [AGE] year old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #6 had no hearing, speech or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-03 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide or obtain laboratory services to meet the needs of its residents and failed to be responsible for the quality and timeliness of the services for one (Resident #1) of eight residents reviewed for labs. The facility failed to complete Resident #1's lab order for C-diff (a bacterium that can cause diarrhea and inflammation of the colon, also known as colitis) as ordered by the physician. The failure could place residents at risk for delays in the provision of treatment for laboratory abnormalities and acute exacerbation of clinical conditions. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's Face Sheet dated [DATE] reflected he a [AGE] year old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted after a brief hospital stay on [DATE], and then died on [DATE] in the facility. Resident #1 had active diagnoses which included sepsis (onset date of [DATE]) (a life-threatening condition that occurs when the body has an extreme response to an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one (Resident #2) of eight residents reviewed for infections. The facility failed to ensure COVID positive Resident #2, was appropriately isolated for 10 days per their facility COVID policy. On 09/03/24, Resident #2 was on day 7 of 10 in her isolation when she was in the communal dining room eating lunch at a table with residents nearby who were not wearing a mask and at risk of contracting the virus. The facility failure placed residents at risk of contracting COVID-19, which could lead to a decline in their health. Findings included: Record review of Resident #2's Face Sheet (dated 09/03/24) reflected she was a [AGE] year old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with active diagnoses which included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean and homelike environment for five of ten residents (Resident #4, Resident #51, Resident #76, Resident #97, Resident #107) surveyed for environment. The facility failed to ensure the privacy curtains were in clean and in good condition/repair for Resident #4, Resident #51, Resident #76, Resident #97, and Resident #107. These failures could place residents at risk for not living in a safe, clean, and homelike environment. Findings included: Record review of Resident #4's Face Sheet revealed she was an [AGE] year-old female re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included heart failure (dysfunction of the heart where it does not pump enough for one's body needs,) schizophrenia (mental disorder characterized by delusions, hallucinations, and disorganized thoughts), bi-polar disorder (mental disorder characterized by extreme mood swings,) and dementia (group of symptoms that affect memory and cognition.)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-14 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure that the resident had the right to be fully informed in language that he or she can understand of his or her total health status, including but not limited to, his or her medical condition for 1 of 8 resident (#54) whose care was reviewed in that: Resident #54 was not provided sufficient modes of communication. This deficient practice could affect residents with a communication/language barrier by contributing to low self-esteem and unmet needs. The findings were: Record review of Resident #54's face sheet, dated 03/12/24 revealed that the resident was a [AGE] year-old male. He was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of vascular dementia, cognitive communication deficit, major depressive disorder, primary open-angle glaucoma, unspecified glaucoma, altered mental status, and essential primary hypertension. Spanish was listed as the resident's primary language. Record Review of Resident #54's MDS, dated [DATE],…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide the necessary services for residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for two (Resident #24 and Resident #29) of eight residents reviewed for ADLs. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #24 received incontinence care every two hours. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #29 had his fingernails cleaned and trimmed. These failures could place residents who were dependent on staff for ADL care at risk for skin breakdown, infections, and a decreased quality of life. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #24's annual MDS assessment, dated 02/02/24, reflected she was an [AGE] year-old female with an admission date of 02/16/21. The resident's cognition was intact. The resident required substantial/maximal assistance with toileting. She was always incontinent of urine and stool. Her diagnoses included stroke. Record review of Resident #24's care plan,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to prevent the development and transmission of infection for one of 8 residents (Resident #89) observed for infection control. CNA A failed to perform hand hygiene during while providing incontinence care to Resident # 89. This failure could place the residents at risk for infection. Findings include: Record review of Resident #89's face sheet dated 03/12/2024 reflected she was [AGE] years old female. She was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, (dementia (a progressive loss of intellectual functioning, especially with impairment of memory and abstract thinking, and often with personality change, resulting from organic disease of the brain). Review of Resident #89's care plan date 12/21/2023 reflected . focus: Resident#89 has an ADL Self Care Performance Deficit and is at risk for not having their needs met in a timely manner, Performance deficit…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident rooms were adequately equipped to allow residents to call for staff assistance through a communication system which relays the call directly to a staff member or to a centralized staff work area for one (Resident # 69) of 7 residents reviewed for resident call system. The facility failed to ensure the call light in resident room [ROOM NUMBER] A used by Resident #69 was always working. This failure could place residents at risk of being unable to obtain assistance for activities of daily living or in the event of an emergency. Findings included: Review of Resident #69's face sheet reflected an [AGE] year-old male with an admission date of [DATE]. admission diagnoses reflected fracture of unspecified part of neck of right femur (the part of the thigh bone, type 2 diabetes, end stage renal disease (a condition in which the kidneys lose the ability to remove waste and excess fluids from your blood) mild cognitive impairment.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-09-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — widespreadEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to provide an environment that was free from accident hazards over which the facility has control and failed to provide supervision and assistive devices to each resident to prevent avoidable accidents for 1 of 3 resident (Resident #50) reviewed for accidents free of hazards. The facility failed to ensure Resident #50 did not elope from the facility on 08/23/23. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The PNC began on 08/23/23 and ended 08/24/23. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. This failure could place residents at risk of accidents, hazards, and improper supervision. Findings Included: Record Review of Resident #50's face sheet dated 09/19/23 revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE]. diagnoses included.: Acute Upper Respiratory Infection, Unspecified (J06.9), Generalized Anxiety Disorder (fears and uneasiness) (F41.1), Alzheimer's Disease, Unspecified (cognitive decline) (G30.9),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-21 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an assessment accurately reflected a resident's status for 5 of 13 Residents (Resident #10 #20, #30, #40, and #50), reviewed for accuracy of MDS assessments. 1. The Quarterly MDS assessment of Resident #10 indicated that the resident had no psychotic behaviors or disorders. 2. The Quarterly MDS assessment of Residents #10, #20, #40, and 50 did not address resident mood, diagnosis, and behaviors associated with diagnosis. 3. The Quarterly MDS assessment for Resident # 30 did not document the resident's anxiety, and oxygen use. 4. The Quarterly MDS assess for Resident # 50 did not document resident, anxiety, history of wandering and elopement, as well as psychotropic medications, psychiatric conditions, medication use and oxygen use. These failures could affect the residents by placing them at risk of inaccurate and incomplete assessments which could result in residents not receiving care to meet their highest level of functioning…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan described the services that were to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 3 (Residents # 10, #20, and #50) of 9 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. The facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive individualized care plan addressing resident's behaviors and interventions. These failures could place residents at risk for possible adverse side effects, adverse consequences, and decreased quality of life and care and worsening of contractures. Resident #10 A Record review of Resident #10's face sheet, dated 09/21/23, revealed [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE]. Her diagnoses include unspecified dementia with agitation restlessness and cognitive decline), repeated falls, and cognitive communication deficit, (difficult to understand), psychotic Disturbances, Mood disturbance without anxiety and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the facility's only kitchen. 1. The facility failed to ensure the proper labeling and dating of all foods stored in the refrigerator, freezer, and dry food storage areas. 2. The facility failed to ensure that staff was wearing the proper head and face coverings when serving food. These failures could place residents at risk for food-borne and transmission-based illnesses. Findings included: Observation on 01/24/23 at 12:25 PM in the facility's only kitchen revealed Interim Dietary Manager and Culinary Regional Dietary Manager, both having at least an inch of facial hair, were not wearing a beard covering. Also observed, was the cook wearing a chef's cap; however, he had at least two inches of hair hanging out the back of his chef cap. All three of them were plating food in the kitchen during lunch time. Observation of dry storage goods area on 01/24/23 at 10:00 am revealed two packages of hamburger…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights and that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #27) reviewed for Care Plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #27's fall mat was placed alongside the resident's bed per his care plan. This failure could place residents at risk of for needs not being met. Findings included: Review of Resident #27's face sheet dated 01/25/23 revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included Seizures and Convulsions (Shaking). Review of Resident #27's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed he had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 0 (Severely Impaired Cognition). He required a two -person physical assist for all Activities of daily Living…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident environment remained as free of accidents hazards as possible: and each resident recieved adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #27) reviewed for accidents and hazards. The facility failed to ensure Resident #27's fall mat was placed alongside the resident's bed. This failure could place residents at risk of for needs not being met. Findings included: Review of Resident #27's face sheet dated 01/25/23 revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included Seizures and Convulsions (Shaking). Review of Resident #27's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed he had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 0 (Severely Impaired Cognition). He required a two -person physical assist for all Activities of daily Living Assistance (ADL's), and used a wheelchair. Review of Resident #27's Care Plan dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$181,828 in federal fines across 3 penalties.
- $93,766 — penalty dated 2026-01-05
- $9,113 — penalty dated 2025-09-12
- $78,949 — penalty dated 2024-12-02
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to ADVANCED HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS — 28 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.9 | -1.9 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.8 | -1.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.0 | ≈ chain avg |
The other 27 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| LEVI, ARI | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | since 03/01/2023 |
| HOOPER, GRADY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 03/01/2023 |
| GARLAND HC LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 03/01/2023 |
| SCHEINER, ELIEZER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 03/01/2023 |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 77% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in TX
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 455731. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-10, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.