Sulphur Springs Health And Rehabilitation
411 Airport Rd, Sulphur Springs, TX 75482 · Government - Hospital district · 128 certified beds · (903) 885-7668 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (52) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $44,044 in federal fines (most recent 2024-12-12)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 13.9% | 15.8% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.3% | 3.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.6% | 0.8% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.7% | 2.4% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.6% | 3.3% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 9.7% | 14.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 28.1% | 18.0% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.4% | 3.8% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 10.6% | 13.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 11.6% | 9.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.8% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 96.4% | 88.0% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 14.7% | 25.7% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 9.9% | 12.3% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 3.53 | 2.17 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 3.59 | 2.06 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
59.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 27 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 63.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 41 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 56% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 59.3%CMS range 45.3–73.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.3%CMS range 7.0–15.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 63.4% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 58.5% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 56.1% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.9%CMS range 4.0–13.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.45 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 128 beds and averages 52.7 residents a day — about 41% occupied, or roughly 75 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.38 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.61 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.05 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.15 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.47 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.77 to 0.21 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
52 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 41 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible and failed to ensure each resident received supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #14) reviewed for accidents and supervision. 1. The facility failed to ensure 2-person assistance was used while providing Resident #14 a bed bath on 06/09/2024. This resulted in Resident #14 falling out of bed and fracturing her right distal tibia (right lower end of the leg). 2. The facility failed to ensure staff knew where to find resident information on the required level of assistance each resident needed. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was identified on 12/11/2024 at 4:25 PM. While the IJ was removed on 12/12/2024 at 3:59 PM, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated with the potential for minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy, due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-24 · tag F0551 — isolatedGive the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents had the right to exercise their rights and to be treated with respect and dignity for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to honor the request by Resident #1's to change his Medical Power of Attorney on 06/04/26 after his care plan meeting. This failure could place residents at risk of not having their preferred responsible party represent them in medical or care decisions. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 06/23/26 indicated an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted [DATE] with diagnoses which included, dementia (a term for several diseases that affect memory, thinking, and the ability to perform daily activities), stroke and high blood pressure. Record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 03/10/26, indicated Resident #1 is usually understood at times and was sometimes understood by others. Resident #1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-24 · tag F0563 — failed to protect the right to visitors — isolatedHonor the resident's right to receive visitors of his or her choosing, at the time of his or her choosing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents have the right to receive visitors of his or her choice and at the time of his or her choosing for 1 (Resident #2) of 10 Residents reviewed for resident rights. The facility did not allow Resident #2 to visit or talk with her Family Members E and G when they called and or came to the facility when Resident #2 wanted to have visitors and calls. This failure could place residents at risk of isolation, decreased emotional wellbeing, and diminished quality of life. Findings included: Review of Resident #2's face sheet dated 06/23/26 reflected that Resident #2 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia (a term for several diseases that affect memory, thinking, and the ability to perform daily activities), depression( sadness), and anxiety (mental health conditions that cause fear, dread and other symptoms that are out of proportion to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-25 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespreadEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to each resident received and the facility provided food and drink that was palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature for 8 of 8 confidential residents, and 1 of 1 meal reviewed for palatability, attractiveness, and appetizing foods. The dietary staff failed to provide food that was palatable and at an appetizing temperature for residents. This failure could place residents at risk of a decreased food intake, hunger, and unwanted weight loss.Findings included: During an observation on 3/24/2026 at 11:50 PM revealed the last temperature was checked of the lunch meal on the warming table with warming plates to prepare to serve the assisted dining area first, main dining, north hall, west hall, and then South hall. The time betray line service began at 12:07 p.m. the test tray was made at 12:11 p.m. During an observation on 3/24/2026 at 12:20 p.m., the tray cart with the test tray left the kitchen preparation area. The tray cart was reviewed by nurses and left the dining room and went directly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the facility's 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for food safety requirements. The facility failed to ensure there was not dust on the air vent above the preparation area.The facility failed to ensure there was no dust and bugs inside the light fixture above the stove. The facility failed to ensure floors did not have a sticky substance.The facility failed to ensure the skillet did not have a carbon buildup around the edge.The facility failed to ensure the baking sheet did not have a carbon buildup around the edge.The facility failed to ensure there was no trash laying on the ground, spilled out of trash bag, in the outdoor garbage dumpster.The facility failed to ensure there was a trash can liner for the hand hygiene trash can. These failures could place residents at risk of foodborne illness, and food contamination.Findings included:During initial tour on 3/23/2026 at 9:40 a.m., the following were identified:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-03-25 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespreadMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that the facility was free of pests and rodents for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for pest control. The facility failed have an effective pest control program to eradicate the cockroaches in the facility. This facility failure could place residents at risk for diarrhea, dysentery (infectious diarrhea), salmonella (an infection that can lead to diarrhea, fever, and stomach cramps), and other serious health concerns.Findings included:During an observation on 3/23/26 at 10:40 a.m. revealed 2 alive water bugs in the secure dining area crawling on the floor. During an observation on 3/23/26 at 11:09 a.m. revealed dead water bugs in the light fixture in the kitchen and on the ground of the dry storage room. During an observation on 3/24/26 at 10:05 a.m. revealed dead water bugs and dark brown particles in the light fixtures in the kitchen above the food preparation area. During an observation on 3/25/26 at 2:30 p.m., revealed large brown bugs in the hall were by the front…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 3 of 24 residents (Resident #15, Resident #10, and Resident #4) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #15's care plan included her medication Eliquis (an anticoagulant) and interventions. The facility failed to ensure Resident #4's care plan included her medication Eliquis (an anticoagulant) and interventions. The facility failed to follow Resident #10's care plan for palm protectors. These failures could place residents at risk of not having their needs met. Findings included: 1.Record review of Resident #15's face sheet dated 03/25/26 indicated she was a [AGE] year-old female who re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses which included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents with pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing for 3 of 5 residents (Resident #45, Resident #37, Resident #19) reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility failed to change Resident #45, Resident #37, Resident #19's wound dressings according to the physician's orders. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving wound care services appropriately, could contribute to a decline in a wound, infection and a decline in physical, mental and psychosocial well-being.Findings included:Record review of face sheet dated 3/25/26 revealed Resident #45 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of lymphedema (swelling in the legs fluid build up), obesity (excess body weight), and pressure ulcer stage 4. Record review of care plan dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 7 residents (Residents #20, and #5) and 2 of 2 staff reviewed for infection control.1. The facility failed to ensure CNA B thoroughly cleaned the peri area, changed gloves, and used hand hygiene before going from dirty to clean while providing incontinent care to Resident #20. 2. The facility did not ensure EBP were put in place for Resident #5. 3. CNA Q failed to perform hand hygiene between resident to resident contact when passing meal trays. 4. CNA R failed to perform hand hygiene between resident to resident contact when passing meal trays. These failures could place residents at risk for cross contamination and the spread of infection. Findings include: 1. During an observation on 03/23/26 at 3:16 p.m.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-25 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to be informed in advance, by the physician or other practitioner or professional, of the risks and benefits of proposed care, of treatment and treatment alternatives or treatment options and to choose the alternative or option he or she prefers,. for 1 of 6 (Resident #1) residents reviewed for psychoactive medications. The facility did not ensure written consent was obtained from the legal authorized representative on HHSC Form 3713 to administer Abilify 10 mg also known as Aripiprazole (atypical antipsychotic medication used to treat schizophrenia, bipolar I disorder, depression, autism-related irritability, and Tourette's syndrome) for Resident #1.This failure could place residents at risk for receiving unnecessary antipsychotic medications without informed consent.Findings included:Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 03/25/26 indicated a [AGE] year-old female who was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-25 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement written policies and procedures that prohibit mistreatment, neglect, and abuse of residents, 1 of 24 (Resident #11) reviewed for abuse. The facility did not implement their policy on reporting abuse to the Abuse Coordinator when Resident #11 stated the word rape while been provided a shower by CNA L. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of unreported abuse, neglect, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review of the facility policy for Policy and Procedures: Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation dated 10/24/22, reflected. 2. The facility's abuse prevention coordinator is responsible for reporting allegations or suspected abuse, neglect . to the state survey agency and other official in accordance with state law.VII Reporting/Response . A. (2.) Reporting of all alleged violations to the Administrator, state agency, adult protective services and to all other required agencies within specified timeframes: 2(a).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 41 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-25 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source were reported immediately, but no later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials including to the State Survey Agency for 1 of 24 (Resident #11) residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. The Abuse Coordinator failed to identify and report an allegation of abuse to HHSC within 2 hours when LVN H informed him on 03/23/26 that Resident #11 stated the word rape and appeared scared while been provided a shower by CNA L. This failure to report could place the residents at risk for abuse and emotional distress. Findings included:Record review of Resident #11's face sheet, dated 03/25/26, reflected Resident #11 was an [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis which included Alzheimer's disease (progressive disease that destroys memory and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-25 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the services provided, as outlined by the comprehensive care plan, met professional standards of quality, for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #13) reviewed for services provided to meet professional standards. The facility did not ensure Resident #13's hospice POC reflected her medication regimen. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of receiving inadequate end-of-life care due to a lack of documentation, coordination of care and communication of resident needs. Findings include: Record review of Resident #13's face sheet, dated 03/25/26, reflected Resident #13 was a [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis which included CAD (occurred when plaque buildup in the arteries, restricting blood flow and oxygen to the heart muscle). Record review of Resident #13's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 03/05/26, reflected Resident #13 sometimes made herself understood and rarely/never understood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain grooming, and personal and oral hygiene were provided for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #10) reviewed for ADL care.The facility failed to ensure Resident #10's fingernails were free from a brown material substance.This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving care/services, and decreased quality of life impacting their loss of dignity. Findings included:Record review of a Resident #10's face sheet, dated 03/26/26, indicated a [AGE] year-old female who was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia (loss memory), muscle weakness, and depressive disorder (persistently depressed mood).Record review of Resident #10's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], indicated Resident #10 sometimes made herself understood and rarely understood others. Resident #10 had difficulty with recall, and her BIMs…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #43) reviewed for quality of care. The facility did not ensure that LVN A followed physician orders for wound care on Resident #43's right second toe on 03/21/26 and 03/22/26. This failure could place residents at risk for a decline in wounds, infection, pain and a decline in functional abilities. Findings include: Record review of Resident #43's face sheet, dated 0325/26, reflected Resident #43 was a [AGE] year-old male, admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis which included hypotension (low blood pressure). Record review of Resident #43's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 02/06/26, reflected Resident #43 usually made himself understood and usually understood others. Resident #43 BIMS score of 8, which reflected his cognition…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the environment was as free of accident hazards as is possible for 1 of 24 residents (Resident #51) reviewed for accidents and hazards. The facility failed to ensure CNA N locked the mechanical lift when transferring Resident #51 from his wheelchair to his bed. These failures could place residents at risk of accidents that could result in serious injury, harm, impairment, or death.Findings included: Record review of Resident #51's face sheet dated 03/25/26 indicated he was an [AGE] year-old male who re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included cerebrovascular disease (a group of conditions that affect blood vessels and blood flow in the brain), history of traumatic brain injury (disruption in normal brain function caused by a blow or bump to the head), cognitive communication deficit (when someone has trouble with one or more cognitive processes involved in communication), and glaucoma (a group of diseases…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assured the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals, to meet the needs of each resident for 2 of 7 resident (Residents #5 and #15) reviewed for pharmacy services. 1.The facility did not ensure LVN A administered Resident #5's Sevelamer Carbonate (a medication used to manage high blood phosphorus levels in adults with chronic kidney disease) 800 mg on [DATE]. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #15's Novolog insulin vial (medication used to administer to residents with high blood sugars) on the west nurse medication cart was not expired prior to placing the open date of [DATE] on the bottle. These failures could place residents at risk for weak bones, joint pain, severe itching, and fractures.Findings include: 1.Record review of Resident #5's face sheet, dated [DATE], reflected Resident #5 was an [AGE] year-old male, admitted to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-25 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' drug regimen was adequately monitored and free from unnecessary drugs for 2 of 6 residents (Resident #15 and Resident #4) reviewed for pharmacy services. 1. The facility failed to monitor Resident #15 for side effects/adverse reactions for the use of Eliquis (an anticoagulant medication- blood thinner). 2. The facility failed to monitor Resident #4 for side effects/adverse reactions for the use of Eliquis (an anticoagulant medication- blood thinner).These failures could place residents at risk of swelling, bruising, and bleeding. Findings include: 1.Record review of Resident #15's face sheet dated 03/25/26 indicated she was a [AGE] year-old female who re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (chronic disease of the lungs that causes difficulty breathing), ventricular tachycardia (life threatening heart arrhythmia defined by a fast heart rate more than 100 beats per…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-25 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide or obtain laboratory services to meet the needs of its residents for 2 of 24 residents (Resident #6 and Resident #5) reviewed for laboratory services. 1. The facility failed to obtain Resident #6's CMP (lab test that provides an overall picture of your body's chemical balance and metabolism, and can help diagnose, screen for, or monitor health conditions or medication side effects), CBC (used to monitor and diagnose medical conditions, check the health of the immune system, and detect disorders including infections, anemia, and blood cancer), and HgA1c (lab test that provides a measurement of the average of the blood sugars in the last 2-3 months to manage diabetes) as ordered on 11/18/25 and every 3 months.2. The facility failed to obtain Resident #5's Magnesium lab (measures the amount of magnesium in the blood which can affect the heart, muscle, and nerve function) as ordered on 11/15/24 and every 12 months. These failures could place…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in (1 of 1) kitchen reviewed for dietary services. 1) The facility failed to dispose of expired food items in the refrigerator and freezer. 2) The facility failed to clean deep fryer weekly. 3) The Facility failed to label and date all food items in the refrigerator and freezer. These failures could place residents at risk for food contamination and foodborne illness. The findings included: Record Review of daily cleaning scheduled dated on the week of 3/31/25 did not indicated that the fryer had been cleaned by a cook on 3/31/25 (Monday), 4/1/25 (Tuesday). 4/2/25 (Wednesday), 4/3/25 (Thursday), 4/4/25 (Friday), 4/5/25 (Saturday) and on 4/6/25 (Sunday). Record Review of in-services on labeling and dating was last completed by staff on 2/10/25 and 4/7/25. Record Review of in-services on the cleaning schedule was last completed by staff on 12-11-24. Record Review of in-services on cleaning the deep…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-12 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide, based on the comprehensive assessment and care plan and the preferences of each resident, an ongoing program to support residents in their choice of activities both facility sponsored group and individual activities and independent activities, designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, encouraging both independence and interation in the community for 3 of 3 residents (Residents #13, #42 and #48) reviewed for activities. The facility failed to provide their scheduled activities on December 9th, 10th and 11th for all residents which included Residents #12, #42 and #48. This failure could place residents at risk for not having activities to meet their interests or needs and a decline in their physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #13's face sheet, dated 12/11/2024, indicated Resident #13 was an [AGE] year-old…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in (1 of 1) kitchen reviewed for dietary services. 1) The facility failed to date all food items. 2) The dietary staff failed to properly seal refrigerated food items. These failures could place residents at risk for food contamination and foodborne illness. The findings included: During observation in the kitchen Refrigerator 1 of 3 on 12/09/24 at 10:02 a.m., the following were observed: -(1) zip lock bag of flour tortilla was not sealed closed. -(1) boiled egg had a prep date of 12/7/24 and had no expiration date. During an interview and observation of the kitchen on 12/11/24 at 10:03 a.m., the Dietary Manager stated the flour tortilla should have been sealed closed. The Dietary Manager stated boiled egg found in a zip lock bag should have had a use by date. The Dietary Manager disposed of the hard-boiled egg found in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment, and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 4 residents (Residents #47 and Resident #3) reviewed for infection control practices. 1. The facility failed to ensure CNA Q used proper hand hygiene between glove changes while she provided incontinent care for Resident #47. 2. The facility failed to ensure CNA P and LVN R complied with Enhanced Barrier Precautions when providing incontinence care for Resident #3 These failures could place residents at risk of exposure to communicable diseases, cross-contamination, and infections. Findings included: 1.Record review of Resident #47's face sheet dated 12/11/24 indicated she was a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (disease of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the promote resident had the right and the facility promoted and facilitated resident self-determination through support of resident choice for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #51) reviewed for resident rights . The facility failed to ensure Resident #51 was assisted out of bed per his preference on 12/09/2024 . This failure could place dependent residents at risk for feelings of depression, lack self-determination, and decreased quality of life. Findings include: Record review of Resident #51's face sheet, dated 12/11/2024, indicated an [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE], readmitted on [DATE] and most recently readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #51 had diagnoses which included Parkinsonism (a syndrome characterized by tremor, bradykinesia, rigidity, and postural instability), Major Depressive Disorder (persistent feelings of sadness and loss of interest) and dementia (loss of memory). Record review of Resident #51's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0573 — isolatedLet each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide the resident access personal and medical records pertaining to him or herself, upon an oral or written request, in the form and format requested by the individual, if it is readily producible in such form and format (including in an electronic form or format when such records are maintained electronically, or, if not, in a readable hard copy from such other form and format as agreed to by the facility and the individual, within 24 hours (excluding weekends and holidays) and allow the resident to obtain a copy of the records or any portions thereof upon request and 2 working days advance notice to the facility for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #16) reviewed for access of records. The facility failed to provide Resident #16's legal representative copies of medical records after a request was submitted to the facility on [DATE]. This failure could place residents at risk of violation of their rights by not receiving copies of their medical records.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to immediately inform the resident, consult with the resident's physician, and notify, consistent with his or her authority, the resident's representative when there was a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status, that is, a deterioration in health, mental, or psychosocial status in either life-threatening conditions or clinical complications for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #16) reviewed for notification of changes. The facility failed to notify Resident #16's physician when Resident #16 had a change in condition on 11/22/24. This failure could place residents' at risk of a delay in treatment and decline in the residents' health and well-being. Findings include: Record review of Resident #16's face sheet, dated 12/11/24, indicated an [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included parkinsonism (a chronic and progressive movement disorder that initially causes tremor in one hand,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had a right to personal privacy and confidentiality of his or her personal and medical records for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #17) reviewed for privacy and confidentiality. The facility failed to ensure LVN BB logged out of her computer and protected Resident#17's Medication Administration Record. This failure could place residents at risk for low self-esteem, loss of dignity, and decreased quality of life due to medication administration records being accessible to others. Findings include: Record review of Resident #17's face sheet, dated 12/11/24, indicated a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE]. Resident #17 had diagnoses which included diabetes ( a disease that occurs when your blood glucose, also called blood sugar, is too high), anxiety (a feeling of fear, dread, and uneasiness), depression (sadness), and high blood pressure. Record review of Resident #17's 5-day…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan each residnet that included the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that met professional standards of quality of care for 1 of 2 resident's (Resident #108) reviewed for baseline care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #108's weight bearing status to her fractured right arm was addressed on the baseline care plan. This failure could place residents at risk of increased pain, and worsening of fractures. Findings include: Record review of Resident #108's face sheet, dated 12/11/2024, indicated a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #108 had diagnoses which included fracture of the right humerus (right upper arm), muscle weakness, unsteadiness on feet and the lack of coordination. Record review of Resident #108's Baseline Care Plan, dated 11/26/2024, indicated Resident #108 desired to discharge back home, advance directive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for1 of 2 residents (Resident #37) reviewed for Care Plans. The facility failed to update Resident #37's Care Plan to reflect a history of Staph dermatitis (an infection caused by staphylococcus bacteria) with interventions for the antibiotic use and the staff to monitor the resident for possible Staph symptoms. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of not receiving the care and services they needed. Findings include: Record review of Resident #37's face sheet, dated 10/10/24, indicated a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #37 had diagnoses which included cerebral infarction (a stroke resulting from disrupted blood flow in the brain),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents requiring respiratory care were provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practices for 2 of 57 residents (Resident #14 and Resident #31) reviewed for respiratory care. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #14's oxygen was administered at 3 liters per minute via nasal cannula as prescribed by the physician. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #31's oxygen was administered at 4 liters per minute via nasal cannula as prescribed by the physician. This failure could place residents who receive respiratory care at risk for developing respiratory complications. The findings included: 1. Record review of the face sheet, dated on 12/10/24, indicated that Resident #14 was an [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on initial admission dated 11/20/16, with diagnoses of COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with (acute) exacerbation (chronic inflammatory lung disease that causes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure all drugs were only accessible by authorized personnel, for 1 of 6 medication carts (400 hall medication cart) observed for medication storage. The facility did not ensure the 400-hall medication cart was secured and unable to be accessed by unauthorized personnel. This deficient practice could place residents at risk for harm due to improper storage and drug diversion. Findings included: Record review of Resident #17's face sheet, dated 12/11/24, indicated a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included diabetes, anxiety (a feeling of fear, dread, and uneasiness), depression (sadness), and high blood pressure. Record review of Resident #17's 5-day MDS assessment, dated 11/01/24, indicated Resident #17 sometimes understood and was sometimes understood by others. Resident #17's BIMS score was 07, which meant she was moderately cognitively impaired. The MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure laboratory services were obtained to meet the needs of 2 of 7 residents (Resident #48 and Resident #12) reviewed for laboratory services. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #48's lipid level (a blood test that measures the levels of different fats in your blood. The test can help identify abnormalities in your blood lipids and determine your risk for certain diseases, including heart disease and stroke) was drawn on 08/14/24. 2. The facility failed to obtain Resident #12's ordered Hgb A1C (hemoglobin A1C measures blood glucose level). These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving lab services as ordered, not receiving timely diagnosis and treatment, and not receiving appropriate monitoring for certain diseases. Findings included: 1)Record review of Resident #48's face sheet dated 12/11/24, indicated a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0839 — isolatedEmploy staff that are licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with state laws.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure professional staff were certified in accordance with applicable State laws for 1 (NA EE) of 15 personnel reviewed for licensed nursing. The facility failed to ensure NA EE had become a Certified Nurse Aide by passing her certification test. This failure could place residents at risk of being provided care by staff who were not qualified per state law. Findings included: Record review of NA EE's employee file indicated she was hired on 4/1/24 as a full-time nursing staff trainee and had no evidence of CNA certification. The employee file indicated NA EE had completed the CNA training course on 04/26/24 but no evidence of the certification. During an interview on 12/12/24 at 11:00 AM NA EE said she had been working at the facility from 4/1/24 up until last week on 12/07/24 providing care for residents to include bathing, transfers, incontinent care, and repositioning. She said the facility notified her on 12/07/24 that she could no longer work as a CNA until she passed her clinical portion of the CNA course which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0840 — isolatedEmploy or obtain outside professional resources to provide services in the nursing home when the facility does not employ a qualified professional to furnish a required service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to arrange an appointment with an outside resource for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #108) reviewed for the use of outside resources. The facility failed to ensure Resident #108's appointment for the orthopedic specialist (specialty for prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of disorders, conditions, and injuries of the skeleton and its associated structures, including muscles, ligaments, joints, and tendons) was made for her right arm fracture. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving needed medical care. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 12/11/2024 indicated Resident #108 was a [AGE] year-old female who admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of a fracture of the right humerus (right upper arm), muscle weakness, unsteadiness on feet, and the lack of coordination. Record review of the AHS-Baseline Care Plan dated 11/26/2024 indicated Resident #108 desired to discharge back home, advance directive status was a full code…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to collaborate with hospice representatives and coordinate the hospice care planning process for each resident receiving hospice services, to ensure the quality of care for the resident, ensuring communication with the hospice medical director, the resident's attending physician, and others participating in the provision of care for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #38) reviewed for hospice services. The facility failed to maintain Resident #38's hospice binder containing information related to hospice services provided for the resident such as the most recent plan of care, hospice election form, and physician recertification. These deficient practices could place residents who receive hospice services at risk of receiving inadequate end-of-life care due to a lack of documentation, coordination of care, and communication of resident needs. The findings included: Record review of Resident #38's face sheet, dated 12/11/24 indicated Resident #38 was a [AGE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and provide care in a manner that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 2 of 6 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for resident rights. CNA B did not treat Resident #1 and Resident #2 with dignity or respect when she spoke to them in a rude tone. This failure could place residents at an increased risk of embarrassment, anger, feelings of worthlessness, sadness, and diminished quality of life. The findings included: 1.Record review of Resident #1' s face sheet dated 8/8/24 indicated she was [AGE] years old, re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe), age related macular degeneration (macular degeneration causes loss in the center of the field of vision), and poly osteoarthritis ( having arthritis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-15 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespreadEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide food that was palatable and served at an appetizing temperature for 3 of 22 residents (Resident's #4, #36, and #42) reviewed for palatable food. The facility failed to provide palatable food served at an appetizing temperature or taste to Resident #4, Resident #36, and Resident #42, who complained the food was served cold, was bland, and did not taste good. This failure could place residents who ate food from the kitchen at risk of weight loss, altered nutritional status, and diminished quality of life. The findings included: During an interview on 11/13/2023 beginning at 10:03 AM, Resident #36 stated the food was terrible. Resident #36 stated sometimes the food was cold. During an interview on 11/13/23 beginning at 11:24 AM, Resident #42 stated the food was tasteless and cold at times. During an interview on 11/13/23 beginning at 1:18 PM, Resident #4 was sitting up in his bed with the head of the bed elevated to an upright position. Resident #4 had his meal tray in front of him on his bedside table.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-11-15 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — widespreadEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident received and the facility provided at least three meals daily, at regular times comparable to normal mealtimes in the community or in accordance with resident needs, preferences, requests, and plan of care for 2 of 2 meals (Lunch meal on 11/13/23 and 11/14/23) observed for frequency of meals. The facility did not serve the 11/13/23 and the 11/14/23 lunch meal at the scheduled time. This failure could place residents at risk for decreased meal satisfaction, decreased intake, loss of appetite, side effects from medication given without food, and diminished quality of life. The findings included: Record review of the facility's mealtimes indicated lunch was served at 12:00 PM. During an interview on 11/13/23 beginning at 11:20 AM, Resident #3's daily visitor stated she was concerned Resident #3 was served lunch at around 1:00 PM most of the time. Resident #3's visitor stated Resident #3 was supposed to be served her lunch around 12 PM, not 1 PM. During an observation on 11/13/23 beginning at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety in the facility's only kitchen. The facility did not ensure: 1. DA E wore a hair net while in the kitchen. 2. Paper towels were readily available at the handwashing sink. 3. Meat was thawing in the appropriate container and sink. 4. Food preparation areas were kept clean and free of crumbs and dirty dishes. 5. The refrigerator was kept at the appropriate temperature. 6. The refrigerator was not leaking condensation. 7. The refrigerator was free of foul-smelling rotting odors. 8. The containers in the refrigerator were labeled, dated, and not expired. 9. Eggs were not cracked. 10. The frozen packages in the freezer were labeled and dated. 11. The can opener tip, microwave, and fryer were kept clean. 12. The grease in the fryer was clean and see-through. 13. The bread was not molding. 14. Items in the dry storage area were labeled. 15.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-15 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents requiring respiratory care were provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practices for 3 of 9 residents (Residents #10, #21 and #115) reviewed for respiratory care. 1. The facility did not ensure Resident #10 and Resident #21's oxygen concentrator filters were cleaned. 2. The facility did not ensure Resident #21's oxygen was set at 3 LPM as ordered by the physician. 3. The facility did not ensure Resident #115's oxygen was set at 2 LPM as ordered by the physician. These failures could place residents who receive respiratory care at risk for developing respiratory complications and a decreased quality of care. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #10's face sheet, dated 11/15/2023, indicated Resident #10 was a [AGE] year-old male, readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included COPD (chronic inflammatory lung disease that causes obstructed airflow from the lungs) and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-15 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to act upon the recommendations of the pharmacist report of irregularities for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #4) reviewed for (DRR) Drug Regimen Review. 1. The facility failed to timely implement Resident #4's signed Note to Attending Physician/Prescriber on 10/12/23, which agreed with the pharmacy recommendation to schedule Resident #4's antianxiety medication. 2. The facility failed to timely implement Resident #4's signed Note to Attending Physician/Prescriber on 10/12/23, which agreed with the pharmacy recommendation for a gradual dose reduction on an antidepressant medication. This failure could place residents at risk for receiving unnecessary medications at the most effective dosage. The findings included: Record review of the face sheet, dated 11/14/23, revealed Resident #4 was a [AGE] year-old male who re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of major depressive disorder (disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-15 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure residents who use psychotropic drugs receive gradual dose reductions, and behavioral interventions, unless clinically contraindicated, in an effort to discontinue these drugs and the facility failed to have target behavioral monitoring in place for behaviors associated with the use of psychotropic medications documented in the clinical record for 3 of 5 (Resident's #4, #10, and #36) reviewed for unnecessary medications. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #4 received a gradual dose reduction of his anti-depressant medication. 2. The facility did not ensure a clinical rationale for declination of a GDR was documented by the physician for Resident #10. 3. The facility did not ensure Resident #36's behaviors were adequately monitored regarding her antianxiety, and antidepressant medications. 4. The facility did not ensure Resident #36's adverse drug event was adequately monitored regarding her antianxiety, and antidepressant medications.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #56) reviewed for infection control practices related to transmission-based precautions and 1 of 3 facility staff members (MA B) reviewed for infection control practices related to medication pass. 1. The facility did not ensure Resident #56 had an order for isolation precautions and appropriate signage outside the door to alert staff and visitors of isolation status and appropriate PPE to wear inside Resident #4's room. 2. The facility did not ensure MA B disinfected the manual blood pressure monitor and stethoscope between Resident #52, #41 and #20. These failures could place residents at increased risk for infection or cross-contamination of communicable disease that could diminish the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-15 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to consult with the resident's physician when there was a significant change in the resident's physical and mental status that is, a deterioration in health, mental, or psychosocial status in either life-threatening conditions or clinical complications for 1 of 22 (Residents #61) residents reviewed change of condition. The facility did not ensure Physician D was notified when Resident #61 was exhibiting suicidal ideation on 11/12/23. This failure could place residents at risk of a delay in treatment or interventions, worsening of their physical and psychological condition, and a decreased quality of life. The findings included: Record review of the face sheet, dated 11/15/23, revealed Resident #61 was an [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of retention of urine, acute kidney failure (condition when an abrupt reduction in kidneys' ability to filter waste products occurs within a few hours or a few days), gross hematuria…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-15 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an encoded, accurate, and complete Quarterly MDS assessment was transmitted to the CMS System within 14 days after completion for 1 of 22 residents (Resident #54) reviewed for MDS assessments. The facility did not ensure Resident #54's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 09/27/2023, and completed on 09/28/2023, was transmitted within 14 days of completion. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of not having records completed and submitted in a timely manner as required. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 11/15/2023, indicated Resident #54 was a [AGE] year-old male, admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a primary diagnosis of Parkinsonism (a clinical syndrome characterized by tremors, slowed movements, postural instability, and stiffness). Record review of Resident #54's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated it was completed on 09/28/2023 (Section Z0500B). Record review of Resident #54's electronic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan to meet resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs identified in the comprehensive assessment for 2 of 22 residents (Residents #20 and #59) reviewed for care plans. 1. The facility did not develop Resident #20's care plan related to him being PASRR positive effective 04/01/2023. 2. The facility did not develop Resident #59's care plan related to Hepatitis C (infection caused by a virus that attacks the liver and leads to inflammation) effective 10/06/2023. These failures could place residents at risk for unmet care needs and decreased quality of care. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #20's face sheet, dated 11/15/2023, indicated Resident #20 was a [AGE] year-old male, readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included bipolar disorder (serious mental illness characterized by extreme mood swings, major depressive disorder, and generalized anxiety…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living, received services to maintain personal hygiene for 2 of 64 (Residents #10 and #21) residents reviewed for ADLs. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #10's fingernails were trimmed routinely. 2. The facility did not ensure Resident #21's fingernails were trimmed and free from a brown colored substance routinely. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving services or care, decreased quality of life, and decreased self-esteem. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #10's face sheet, dated 11/15/2023, indicated Resident #10 was a [AGE] year-old male, readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included COPD (chronic inflammatory lung disease that causes obstructed airflow from the lungs) and obstructive sleep apnea (intermittent airflow blockage during sleep). Record review of the quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE],…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-15 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide mentally related social services to attain or maintain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 1 (Resident #61) residents reviewed for social services. 1. The facility failed to ensure the Social Worker was notified and social services were provided after Resident #61 exhibited suicidal ideations on 11/12/23. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #61 received a psychiatric referral after he exhibited suicidal ideations on 11/12/23. These failures could place residents at risk for their mental and psychosocial needs not being met and a decreased quality of life. The findings included: Record review of the face sheet, dated 11/15/23, revealed Resident #61 was an [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of retention of urine (holding urine in the bladder and inability to empty bladder fully), acute kidney failure (condition when an abrupt reduction in kidneys' ability to filter waste…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-15 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to determine that drug records are in order and that an account of all controlled drugs was maintained and periodically reconciled for 2 of 4 medication carts (North and [NAME] Hall) and 1 of 5 residents (Resident #20) reviewed for pharmacy services. 1. The facility did not ensure Resident #20's lactobacillus 0.2 mg (medication that is used to prevent or treat infections in children and adult) as ordered by the physician was administered instead of the lactobacillus 10 mg. 2. The facility did not ensure LVN M counted controlled drugs every shift change on 11/02/2023 and 11/05/2023. These failures could result in an inaccurate controlled medication count, drug diversion, and decreased therapeutic effects from medications. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #20's face sheet, dated 11/15/2023, indicated Resident #20 was a [AGE] year-old male, readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-15 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure laboratory services were obtained to meet the needs of 1 of 22 residents (Resident #10) reviewed for laboratory services. The facility did not obtain a physician's ordered Hgb A1c (a blood test that measures the average blood sugar levels over the past three months) for Resident #10. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving lab services as ordered and not managing medications at a therapeutic level. Findings included: Record review of Resident #10's face sheet, dated 11/15/2023, indicated Resident #10 was a [AGE] year-old male, readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included bipolar type 2 diabetes with diabetic neuropathy (chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar and a type of nerve damage that can occur with diabetes) Record review of the order summary report, dated 11/15/2023, indicated an order for Hgb A1c every 3 months with a start date 03/02/2023. Record review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-15 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to promote antibiotic stewardship by ensuring the appropriate use of antibiotic therapy and providing written rationale, by the provider, when an antibiotic was used despite criteria, to determine the appropriate use of an antibiotic for 1 of 2 residents (Residents #3) reviewed for antibiotic use. The facility failed to assess and incorporate monitoring of antibiotic use for Resident #3. This failure could place residents receiving antibiotics at risk for unnecessary antibiotic use, inappropriate antibiotic use, and increased antibiotic-resistant infections. Findings included: Record review of Resident #3's face sheet, dated 11/15/2023, revealed an [AGE] year-old female initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis which included unspecified fracture of shaft of right fibula (broken leg), type 2 diabetes (blood sugar disorder) and heart failure (heart does not pump blood as good as it should). Record review of the MDS Resident Assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-15 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — isolatedHave policies on smoking.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their established smoking policy for 1 of 1 smoking area reviewed for smoking. The facility did not ensure smoked cigarettes were extinguished in a fire-retardant receptacle. This failure could place residents at risk for smoking-related injuries and fires in the facility. Findings included: During an observation on 11/13/2023 at 12:25 p.m., the designated smoking area had numerous cigarette butts laying on the ground. During an observation on 11/14/2023 at 3:27 p.m., the designated smoking area had numerous cigarette butts laying on the ground. During an interview on 11/15/2023 at 4:28 p.m., the Maintenance Manager stated the maintenance supervisor was responsible for monitoring the smoking area. The Maintenance Manager stated he was filling in for the maintenance supervisor since he was on vacation. The Maintenance Manager stated he had not been outside to the smoking area. The Maintenance Manager stated the cigarette butts should be disposed in the metal container. The Maintenance Manager stated it…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$44,044 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $44,044 — penalty dated 2024-12-12
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to ADVANCED HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS — 28 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.0 | +1.0 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.0 | +1.0 vs chain |
The other 27 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| BLUE, CHRISTOPHER | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | since 04/01/2023 |
| HOOPER, GRADY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 04/01/2023 |
| SULPHUR SPRINGS HC, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 04/01/2023 |
| SCHEINER, ELIEZER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 04/01/2023 |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $41K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in TX
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 455579. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.