McAllen Nursing Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.52 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 83% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 122 beds and averages 69.8 residents a day — about 57% occupied, or roughly 52 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.90 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.31 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.72 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.60 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.02 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.34 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-10-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision was provided for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for accidents and supervision. (Resident #1) The facility failed to ensure Resident#1 received adequate supervision to prevent elopement. Resident #1 eloped from the facility and was found by the police department approximately 0.2 miles away from the facility. The Immediate Jeopardy template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 4:38 p.m. While the Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 10/26/2024 at 1:33 p.m., the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and severity level of potential for more than minimal harm because all staff was not aware of and did not implement the facility's elopement procedures. This failure could prevent residents from receiving appropriate supervision which could lead to resident sustaining serious injury, harm, or death. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's electronic facility face sheet dated 10/24/2024,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-07-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision was provided to prevent accidents for 1 of 5 residents (R #1) reviewed for supervision. The facility failed to ensure R #1 received adequate supervision as R #1 eloped from the facility without anyone's knowledge on 07/19/24 between 7:30-7:40 PM and was found at an apartment complex approximately 0.2 mile away. R #1 was exit seeking, had increased behaviors, and staff placed R #1 in his room and failed to request additional interventions or increased supervision. R #1 was out of the facility for approximately 30 minutes before the facility became aware that he had eloped. The non-compliance was identified as Past Non-Compliance. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) began on 07/19/24 and ended on 07/22/24. The facility corrected the non-compliance before the investigation began. This failure could lead to residents exiting the facility unattended which could result in injuries, hospitalization, or death. The findings…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2023-08-29 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff and the public for 3 of 6 halls and 1 of 1 dining rooms reviewed for environment, in that: The facility failed ensure that 3 of 11 rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER], 21 and 22) in Hall B, 4 of 12 rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER], 47, 48, and 49) in Hall E, 5 of 11 rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER], 54, 55, 57 and 59) in Hall F received repair and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior that was free of environmental hazards. An IJ was identified on 07/21/23. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 4:52pm. While the IJ was removed on 08/09/23, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of widespread and a severity level of no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm because repair of damaged areas had not yet been completed. These failures could lead to residents living in an environment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights and that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 (Resident #19) of 13 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. The facility failed to include Resident #19's use of a foley catheter (a device that drains urine from your urinary bladder into a collection bag outside of your body) in her care plan. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving adequate care for a foley catheter device which could potentially lead to infection and deterioration of health. The findings were: Record review of Resident #19's face sheet dated 06/23/26 revealed a [AGE] year-old female originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and then a re-admission date of 06/17/26. Her diagnoses included…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-13 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to respect the residents' right to personal privacy and confidentiality, for 3 of 11 residents (Resident #1, Resident #4, and Resident #7) reviewed for personal privacy and confidentiality. The facility failed to provide personal privacy and confidentiality for Resident #1, Resident #4, and Resident #7 when the residents and their private space were recorded without the resident's or designated representative's consent; and the video was posted on social media on 05/10/26. This failure could place residents at risk of their right to privacy and confidentiality not being honored or respected. Findings included:1. Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 05/13/26, reflected a [AGE] year-old female, admitted on [DATE], diagnoses included: Alzheimer's disease (progressive neurodegenerative disorder that primarily affects memory, thinking, and behavior, and is the most common cause of dementia), mood disorder due to physiological condition…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-03 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the comprehensive care plans were periodically reviewed and revised by a team of qualified persons after each assessment, including both the comprehensive and quarterly review assessments for 2 of 3 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for care plans, in that:1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's care plan reflected an unwitnessed fall on 11/27/2025.2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's care plan reflected witnessed falls on 11/14/2025, 12/16/2025, and 12/30/2025.This failure could place residents at risk of not being provided the necessary care or services and not having personalized care plans updated to address their specific needs. The Findings included:1. Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 2/3/26 reflected Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE] with an original admission date of 7/3/24. Resident # 1 was an [AGE] year old with diagnosis of muscle weakness, reduced mobility, stiffness of unspecified…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices that were complete and accurately documented for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed for accuracy of records, in that:LVN A failed to document the administration of clonazepam and insulin on 10/11/25 and 10/17/25.LVN B failed to document the administration of clonazepam and insulin on 10/27/25 and 10/28/25. This failure could affect residents whose records are maintained by the facility and could place them at risk for errors in care.The findings included:Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 11/21/25 reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Parkinson's disease (movement disorder of the nervous system), type 2 diabetes (high levels of sugar in blood), unspecified intellectual disabilities, autistic disorder (developmental condition that affects…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-17 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain clinical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices that are complete and accurately documented for 2 (Resident #1 and Resident #2) of 4 residents reviewed for medical records accuracy, in that: The facility failed to provide any documentation in the Progress Notes for Resident #1 and Resident #2 for the resident-to-resident altercation on 07/13/2025. This deficient practice could affect residents whose records are maintained by the facility and could place them at risk for errors in care, and treatment. The findings included: 1.Record review of Resident #1's admission record dated 08/16/2025, revealed a [AGE] year-old male with an initial admission date of 08/30/2024 and a re-admission on [DATE]. Resident #1's diagnoses included cerebral infarction (stroke), paranoid personality disorder (a personality disorder characterized by paranoia, and a pervasive, long-standing suspiciousness and generalized mistrust of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure each resident and/ or their representative and the IDT were invited to attend/participate in the care plan meetings including both the comprehensive and quarterly review assessments for the resident for 2 of 6 residents (Resident #1 and Resident 2) reviewed for care plan timing and revision. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 and Resident #2's care plan was revised to accurately reflect current smoking status. The facility failed to develop a care plan for Resident #2 to address his discharge plan. These failures could place the residents at risk of not receiving appropriate interventions and care to meet their needs as indicated on the comprehensive care plans. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 05/20/25 reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: bipolar disorder (mental health condition with mood swings), type 2 diabetes…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, and included the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable for 2 of 4 (B-hall and D/E-halls) medication carts reviewed for medication storage. 1. The facility failed to store 17 loose tablets/capsules in their appropriate blister packs in the medication cart for B-hall. 2. The facility failed to store 17 loose tablets/capsules in their appropriate blister packs in the medication cart for D/E-halls. These deficient practices could place residents at risk of losing medications leading to medication shortage. The findings included: An observation of the B-hall medication cart on 04/23/25 at 12:25 PM revealed 17 assorted tablets and capsules loose in the 2nd drawer from the top. The drawer contained blister packs of medications for residents living on the B-hall along with the loose medications. An observation of the D/E-hall medication…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-24 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain clinical records on each resident that were complete and accurately documented in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices for 2 (Resident #2 and Resident #11) of 6 residents reviewed for accuracy and completeness of clinical records. 1. The facility failed to ensure LVN A correctly documented Resident #2's blood pressure 59 times when she administered blood pressure altering medications (amiodarone, hydralazine, metoprolol, and midodrine) between 04/01/25 and 04/23/25. 2. The facility failed to ensure LVN I correctly documented Resident #2's blood pressure 10 times when she administered blood pressure altering medications (amiodarone, hydralazine, metoprolol, and midodrine) between 04/01/25 and 04/23/25. 3. The facility failed to ensure LVN D correctly documented Resident #2's blood pressure 4 times when she administered blood pressure altering medications (amiodarone, hydralazine, metoprolol, and midodrine) between…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident had the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriaton of resident property, and exploitation for two out of 10 residents (Resident #59 and Resident # 100) reviewed for abuse/neglect. The facility failed to ensure Resident #59 was free of abuse. Resident #59 was hit on the head twice by Resident #100 on 02/22/25. This failure could place residents at risk of serious injury or death. The findings include: 1.Record review of Resident #59's face sheet dated 04/23/2025 indicated a [AGE] year-old male who was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #59 had a diagnoses which included nontraumatic subdural hemorrhage (rare condition where a blood clot forms in the space between the brain and its outer lining) , dysphagia( difficulty swallowing), difficulty in walking, other lack of coordination, muscle weakness, cognitive communication deficit (problems in communicating in conversations) , dementia (loss…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment including injuries or unknown source and misappropriation of residents property, were reported immediately, but not later than two hours after the allegation was made, if the events that caused the allegation involved abuse or resulted in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials, including to the State Agency, in accordance with State Law through established procedures for 1 out of 10 residents (Resident #59 that occurred on 02/24/25 to the local law enforcement agency, for 1 of 10 residents (Resident #59 ) reviewed for reporting of abuse/neglect. The facility failed to report an incident involving Resident #100 and Resident #59 that occurred on 02/24/25 to the local law enforcement agency. This failure could place residents at risk for potential abuse. The findings include: 1.Record review of Resident #59's face sheet…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$17,459 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $8,447 — penalty dated 2024-10-28
• $9,012 — penalty dated 2024-07-26

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ADVANCED HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS — 28 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 83% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $310K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX