Mesquite Tree Nursing Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 54% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 143 beds and averages 83.3 residents a day — about 58% occupied, or roughly 60 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.23 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.40 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.13 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.86 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.38 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.42 to 0.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 59% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2023-08-27 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure resident was free of any significant medication errors for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for significant medication errors. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was free of any significant medication errors by failing to ensure a resident received the correct prescribed intravenous (IV) medication, which resulted in the resident being given an IV medication that she had a known allergy to. This failure resulted in a PNC IJ (Past Non-Compliance Immediate Jeopardy), the IJ (Immediate Jeopardy) started on 08/24/2023 and ended on 08/26/2023. The facility had corrected the IJ (Immediate Jeopardy) prior to entry for abbreviated survey. There was no resident in the facility on IV therapy, facility had completed staff in-service on medication administration and LVN A had been educated on medication administration prior to entry. This failure could place residents at risk of complications from deterioration in health, potential for severe…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · E2026-06-24 · tag F0800 — pattern
  Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide each resident with nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets the resident's nutritional needs for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for dietary needs.The facility's kitchen failed to prepare and serve 3 ounces of pork loin as stated on resident meal tickets on 06/24/2026.This failure places residents at risk of not meeting their daily nutritional needs and could result in weight loss or decline in overall quality of health. Findings included:Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 06/24/2026, revealed a [AGE] year-old male, admitted on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of cerebrovascular disease (condition that impacts blood vessels in the brain). Other pertinent diagnoses include protein-calorie malnutrition.Record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], revealed he had a BIMs score of 14 (indicating intact cognitive function). His active diagnosis included malnutrition.Record…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety in the facility's only kitchen.The facility failed to ensure a bag of dry rolled oats were not sitting on the floor in the kitchen preparation area.The facility failed to ensure raw meat was being thawed properly.The facility failed to ensure food items were not in the same sink compartment as used dishes.These failures could place residents at risk for foodborne illness and foodborne intoxication.Findings included:Observation on 06/24/2026 at 12:19 PM of the facility's kitchen revealed a 50 lb bag of rolled oats sitting on the kitchen floor leaning up against a food preparation table.Observation on 06/24/2026 at 12:38 PM of the facility's 2 compartment sink, next to the handwashing sink, revealed a large piece of raw pork loin, uncovered and unsealed in a large metal pan, with a food strainer in the 1st compartment. After the surveyor noticed the meat, the DM turned on the cold water to run over the raw…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-20 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately reflected the resident's status for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #4) reviewed for resident assessments.The facility failed to accurately assess and document Resident #1's active medical diagnosis of depression.The facility failed to accurately assess Resident #4's antidepressant medication status.The facility failed to accurately document Resident #4's active medical diagnosis.These failures could place residents at risk of having inaccurate diagnoses and inappropriate identification of care needs.1. Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 05/20/2026 revealed a [AGE] year-old male with a primary diagnosis of encephalopathy (abnormal brain function, lead to cognitive impairment). Other pertinent diagnoses include cerebral infarction (stroke), cognitive communication deficit (impaired ability to communicate), and mild cognitive impairment (noticeable cognitive decline). Record review of Resident #1's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that included measurable objectives and time frames to meet residents' mental and psychosocial needs, for three residents (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) of 11 residents reviewed for care plans.The facility did not develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan to address the discharge plans of Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3.This failure could place residents at risk of not having their discharge goals met.The findings were:Resident #11) Record review of Resident #1's Face Sheet reflected a 56 years-old male who was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including in part: sepsis (a life-threatening reaction to an infection), metabolic encephalopathy (a change in how the brain works due to an underlying condition), and multiple sclerosis (a disease where the immune system attacks the brain and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety in the facility's only kitchen. The facility failed to ensure Dietary Aide A wore a hairnet.The facility failed to ensure two 32-ounce pitchers of dark red liquid were labeled with the name of the product and dated with the use by date.The facility failed to ensure that meat that was submerged in a bowl full of water in the sink was thawed out under running water.The facility failed to ensure on 03/03/26 1 of 2 drink pitchers that held a dark yellow orange liquid were labeled with the name of the product and dated with the use by date, in 1 of 2 stand-by refrigerators.The facility failed to ensure a 3.5-gallon tea urn was labeled with the name of the product and dated with the use by date.The facility failed to ensure ground meat in a metal bin not in its original package, brown meat in a metal bin not in its original package, and vegetables with meat in a metal bin and not in its original package were labeled and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-11 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident and the ombudsman of the transfer or discharge and the reason for the move in writing for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for discharge rights. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was notified in writing of the details of the transfer. The facility failed to notify the ombudsman of Resident 1's transfer. This failure could affect all residents who were transferred or discharged to another facility at risk of having their discharge rights violated. Findings included:Record review of Resident #1 Face Sheet. dated 02/15/2025 revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include Parkinsonism, Depression and Schizoaffective Disorder. Record review of Resident #1 MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected the resident had a BIMS score of 14 indicating no cognitive impairment. Section Q 0400 reflects no Discharge plan in place. Section Q0610 reflects that there was no referral made…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who needed respiratory care ,including tracheostomy care and tracheal suctioning, were provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals and preferences for 1 of 1 (Resident #1) residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to ensure physician's orders were written for oxygen use via nasal canula for Resident #1 on readmission [DATE] to 09/16/2025. This failure could place residents at risk for incorrect treatment decisions, evaluation, and treatment plans compromising patient safety due to insufficient information records. Record review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], reflected Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on 02 /14/25, and readmission on [DATE] with diagnoses of Cerebrovascular Accident (Occurs when blood flow to the brain is interrupted, leading to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to provide the necessary services for residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 2 (Resident #1, and Resident #2) of 11 residents reviewed for ADLs. The facility failed to ensure:- Resident #1 had his fingernails cleaned and trimmed.- Resident #2 had his fingernails trimmed. These failures could place residents who were dependent on staff for ADL care at risk for loss of dignity, risk for infections, and a decreased quality of life. 1- Record review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], reflected Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on 02 /14/25, and readmission on [DATE] with diagnoses of Cerebrovascular Accident (Occurs when blood flow to the brain is interrupted, leading to brain cell death and potential neurological damage), Seizure Disorder or Epilepsy (a neurological condition characterized by recurrent seizer), Asthma…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-16 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
  Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to be adequately equipped to allow residents to call for assistance through a communication system which relays the call directly to a staff member or to a centralized staff work area from each resident's bedside for 1 of 11 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for reasonable accommodations. The facility failed to ensure the call light in the resident room, used by Resident #1, was always within reach. This failure could place residents at risk of being unable to obtain assistance for activities of daily living or in the event of an emergency. Record review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], reflected Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on 02 /14/25, and readmission on [DATE] with diagnoses of Cerebrovascular Accident (Occurs when blood flow to the brain is interrupted, leading to brain cell death and potential neurological damage), Seizure Disorder or Epilepsy (a neurological condition…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-06-11 · tag F0850 — failed to provide social-work services — pattern
  Hire a qualified full-time social worker in a facility with more than 120 beds.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility with more than 120 beds failed to employ a qualified social worker on a full-time basis, for 1 of 1 social services staff reviewed for qualifications of Social Worker. 1. The facility, licensed for 144 beds, did not employ a full-time social worker from 3/26/25 to 6/11/25. This failure could place residents at risk of social service and psychosocial needs not being met. The findings included: Record review of the facility's Daily Census Report, dated 6/10/25, noted the facility had a total licensed bed capacity of 144. Record review of the Facility Summary Report from the Texas Unified Licensure Information Portal (TULIP) date 06/06/25 noted the facility had a total licensed capacity of 144 beds. Record review of an undated document titled Job Details reflected the Previous Social Worker was employed from 7/11/23 to 3/26/25. In an interview on 6/10/25 at 2:37 PM, ADON B stated the facility did not have a social worker and had not had a social worker since the end of March. ADON B stated the Previous Social Worker left on vacation…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ADVANCED HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS — 28 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $230K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX