The Renaissance At Kessler Park

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Met the expected recovery: 75.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 32 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 30% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 135 beds and averages 72.4 residents a day — about 54% occupied, or roughly 63 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.92 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.24 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.64 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.88 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.94 on weekdays — 2% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.16 to 0.44 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-07-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices for one (Resident #1) of two residents reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to call physician for an x-ray order of Resident #1's left wrist and hand in a timely manner, which resulted in delayed treatment for a period of 7 days without treatment. On 06/15/2024, approximately 7:45 AM CNA B reported to RN A, pain and swelling in Resident # 1's left hand. Left hand noted swollen. Resident # 1 revealed difficult to move at wrist, there was swelling and slight reddish bruising. Resident stated she fell on 6/14/24 after breakfast. Resident #1 was able to get herself up. Resident #1 assessed by RN A, DON notified. X-ray order was received from the APN to x-ray left wrist and hand on 06/15/2024 approximately at 7:45 AM. On 06/15/2024 at approximately 6:00 PM, Resident #1…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety in 1 of 1 (Kitchen #1) reviewed for food safety in facility's only kitchen. The facility failed to ensure leftover food was labeled, dated, and stored properly in the refrigerator.The facility failed to ensure personal cups were kept in the designated area and not on the prep table. These failures place residents at risk of cross-contamination and foodborne illnesses.Findings included:During an observation on 05/12/26 at 7:30 AM, of the prep table, reflected meatloaf on a plate covered with saran wrap next to a disposable cup containing water and ice. During an interview on 05/12/26 at 8:50 AM, Dietary Aide A stated the plate on the table contained meatloaf. She stated the plate should have been thrown in the trash, but it was on the prep table all night. Dietary A stated staff were not allowed to work overtime, and she was not able to load any more dishes after 7:15 PM, to wash them after the previous night's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-12 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to (i) Notify the resident and the resident's representative(s) of the transfer or discharge and the reasons for the move in writing and in a language and manner they understand. The facility must send a copy of the notice to a representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed for discharge or transfer.The facility failed to provide written notification to Resident #1's RP and Long-term care Ombudsmen. This failure could place residents at risk of improper transfer from the facility.Findings included:Findings included:Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, 05/12/26, reflected an [AGE] year old male, admitted [DATE], diagnosed with Schizophrenia, unspecified, (severe mental disorder that affects how a person thinks, feels, and behaves, often leading to hallucinations ,delusions and disorganized thinking), Unspecified Dementia, moderate with other behavioral disturbance (progressive decline…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights set forth at S483.10(c)(2) and S483.10(c)(3), that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment. for 1(Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed.The facility failed to update Resident #1's care plan to reflect a history of exit seeking behaviors.This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving proper care.Findings included:Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, 05/12/26, reflected an [AGE] year old male, admitted [DATE], diagnosed with Schizophrenia, unspecified, (severe mental disorder that affects how a person thinks, feels, and behaves, often leading to hallucinations ,delusions and disorganized thinking), Unspecified Dementia, moderate with other behavioral disturbance (progressive decline in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services including procedures that assure the accurate dispensing and administering of all drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of each resident for 1 (Resident #10) of 4 residents reviewed for pharmaceutical services. The facility failed to ensure a package of Resident #10's Morphine Sulfate and MS Contin were immediately delivered to facility nursing staff by CNA A. This failure placed all 60 residents at the facility at risk of not receiving the therapy and/or care per provider orders to allow her to attain or maintain her highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.Findings included: Record review of Resident #10's Face Sheet revealed she was an [AGE] year-old resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] for long term care. Relevant diagnoses included end stage heart disease (irreversible condition where the heart cannot pump effectively to meet the body's needs,) dementia (decline in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for two (Resident #1 and Resident #2) of four residents reviewed for infection control. 1.LVN B, LVN D, and CNA A did not wear gowns for PPE for Resident #1 who was on EBP during incontinent care and linen change. 2. The facility did not keep Resident #1 and Resident #2 ' s feeding pump pole free of a brown, thick substance, and a sticky dirt substance on both the poles, and the floor under the poles, while using the poles to feed Resident #1 and Resident #2. These failures affected residents by placing them at an increased and unnecessary risk of exposure to communicable diseases and infections. Findings included: Resident#1 Review of Resident #1 ' s face sheet, dated 06/18/25, reflected she was a [AGE] year-old woman, admitted…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide a resident who was unable to carry out ADLs the necessary services to maintain grooming, and personal hygiene for one (Resident #1) of four residents reviewed for ADL care. Resident #1 ' s brief was soiled, and her bedding had a brown ring around her, with a strong ammonia odor, on 06/18/2025. This failure could affect residents by decreasing quality of life and contributing to skin breakdown. Findings included: Review of Resident #1 ' s face sheet, dated 06/18/25, reflected she was a [AGE] year-old woman, admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses of sepsis (the body responds to an infection by attacking the body ' s own organs), pneumonia (a lung infection), a pressure ulcer, dysphagia (an inability to swallow properly), stroke, and gastronomy status (use of a feeding tube inserted into the stomach). Review of Resident #1 ' s MDS assessment, dated 03/25/25, reflected Resident #1 had unclear speech, impaired vision, was rarely able to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-18 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents receiving enteral feeding received appropriate care and services to prevent complications of enteral feedings for one (Resident # 1) of two residents reviewed for enteral feedings. 1.The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was not laid flat in bed while her enteral feeding was still running. This failure placed residents with enteral feedings at risk of aspiration (entering the airways or lungs) and hospitalization. Findings Included: Review of Resident #1 ' s face sheet, dated 06/18/25, reflected she was a [AGE] year-old woman, admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses of sepsis (the body responds to an infection by attacking the body ' s own organs), pneumonia (a lung infection), a pressure ulcer, dysphagia (an inability to swallow properly), stroke, and gastronomy status (use of a feeding tube inserted into the stomach). Review of Resident #1 ' s MDS assessment, dated 03/25/25, reflected Resident #1 had unclear speech,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-24 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure each resident had the right to be free from abuse for four (Residents #1, #2, #3, #4) of 9 residents reviewed for Abuse. 1.The facility staff failed to ensure Resident #1 did not hit Resident #2, which resulted in Resident #2 getting a skin tear to his face in the dining room on 09/14/24. 2. The facility staff failed to ensure Residents #3 did not throw orange juice twice, at Resident #4, which resulted in Resident #4 hitting Resident #3 in the face and causing redness to Resident #3's face, in the dining room on 09/13/24. These failures could place residents at risk of injuries such as fractures, bruising, skin tears, and psychological harm resulting in decreased health and psycho-social well-being. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a BIMS score of 14 (No cognitive impairment), with medically complex…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 facility kitchen reviewed for food safety. The facility failed to use one utensil for each food item served during lunch. This failure could place residents at risk for food-borne illness and food contamination. Findings include: Observation on 08/28/2024 at 11:55 AM revealed [NAME] D used the same tongs to pick up and serve both pork loin and beef patties. [NAME] D repeated the serving actions again at 11:58 AM Observation on 08/28/2024 at 12:08 PM reflected [NAME] D used the tongs previously used to pick up pork loin and beef patties to pick up French fries. Interview on 08/28/2024 at 12:21 pm with [NAME] D revealed there was only one pair of tongs to use during lunch service. [NAME] D stated the risk of using one utensil to serve multiple food items would be food transfer. Interview on 08/28/2024 at 1:18 PM with Dietary Manager reflected each food item was supposed to have its own serving utensil. He stated that there…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, the medical record was maintained on each resident that were complete and accurately documented for 1 (Resident #49) of 8 residents records reviewed for treatment documentation. The facility failed to ensure Resident #49's orders for his tracheostomy and tracheostomy care were in the EMR. This failure could affect any resident, placing them at risk of inaccurate information and resulting inappropriate care. Findings included: Review of Resident #49's admission Record, dated 08/29/24, reflected he was a [AGE] year-old male originally admitted on [DATE], and most recently re-admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses of anoxic brain damage (brain damage from lack of oxygen), tracheostomy status (surgically inserted tube into airway for breathing), and acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (a condition in which the lungs do not properly exchange oxygen for carbon…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$11,031 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $11,031 — penalty dated 2024-07-25

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ADVANCED HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS — 28 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 94% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $60K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX