Laredo South Nursing And Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

31.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 36 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 38% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 112 beds and averages 68.1 residents a day — about 61% occupied, or roughly 44 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.19 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.70 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.87 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.61 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.43 on weekdays — 24% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.86 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 37% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-05-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for one resident (Resident #1) reviewed for supervision. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 received adequate supervision while Resident #1 eloped from the facility during lunch time. This failure could place residents requiring supervision at risk for injury and accidents with potential for more than minimal harm. The noncompliance was identified as Past Non-Compliance. The IJ began on 10/17/23 and ended on 10/18/23. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the investigation began. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 5/09/24 reflected an [AGE] year-old-female with an original admission date of 1/19/22. Diagnosis included type two diabetes (insufficient insulin production in the body), acute (sudden) kidney failure, and dementia (mental decline that affects the quality of daily living). Record review of Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-30 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for one (Resident #1) of four residents reviewed for call light placement. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's call light was within reach on 06/29/26. This failure could place residents at risk for needs and accommodations being unmet and a delay in care.Record review of a face sheet dated 6/29/2026 indicated Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old male, initially admitted on [DATE] and last re-admitted on [DATE], diagnoses included Hypertensive Heart Disease without heart failure (heart damage or structural changes caused by long-term high blood pressure), Epileptic seizures related to external causes (sudden temporary bursts of abnormal electrical activity in the brain that disrupt normal communication between nerve cells), depression, Hemiplegia (the complete or partial paralysis of the entire side of the body) and hemiparesis (partial weakness or reduced control on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food per professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for storage, preparation, and sanitation.The facility failed to ensure dishes were cleaned after washing and not used for service.The facility failed to ensure the utensils were in good condition.The facility failed to ensure personal items were not in the prep areas.The facility failed to ensure a cabinet door was safe to open.The facility failed to ensure table scraps were disposed of properly.The facility failed to ensure personal items were separated from leftovers in refrigerator #D2.The facility failed to ensure food items in refrigerators #A1, and #D2, and freezers #B3, #C3, and #D2 were labeled, dated, and stored properly.The facility failed to ensure the dry storage area was free from fruit and dented cans.The facility failed to ensure food items in the dry storage area were properly sealed, labeled, and dated. The facility failed to properly maintain temperature logs in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-07-22 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 2 glucometers (device used to measure the amount of glucose in a resident's blood) reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure the glucometer in the nurse cart for halls 100, 200 and 400 were tested for accuracy and recorded in the glucometer logbook on 07/01/25, 07/02/25, 07/07/25, 07/08/25, and 07/21/25 in the month of July. These failures could place residents at risk of receiving either too much insulin or not enough. The findings included:Record review of the glucometer logbook on 07/22/25 at 10:37 AM revealed the test results for the glucometer in the nurse cart for halls 100, 200 and 400 were not recorded on 07/01/25, 07/02/25, 07/07/25, 07/08/25, and 07/21/25. In an interview with the DON on 07/22/25 at 1:11 PM, the DON stated the glucometers were supposed to be tested every day on the night shift by the nurses and the results recorded in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-22 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to privacy for 1 (Resident #5) of 17 residents reviewed for privacy. The facility failed to ensure the WCN provided privacy for Resident #5 while performing his wound care. This failure could cause residents to feel uncomfortable, disrespected, and possibly a loss of dignity due to a lack of privacy. The findings include:Record review of Resident # 5's face sheet dated 07/21/25 reflected an [AGE] year-old-male with an original admission date of 09/09/24. Diagnoses included congestive heart failure, high blood pressure, type two diabetes (insufficient production of insulin in the body), and pressure ulcer (a localized injury to the skin and underlying tissue caused by prolonged pressure) at an unspecified site and location. Record review of Resident #5's physician orders dated 07/20/25 reflected: Cleanse Sacrum (triangular bone at the base of the spine. Upper cack part of the pelvic cavity) with normal saline,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs for one resident (Resident #7) of 17 residents whose care plans were reviewed. The facility failed to ensure Resident #7's comprehensive care plan was updated was developed and implemented after starting anticoagulant (blood thinner) medication on 04/26/25. The deficient practice could place residents in the facility at risk of not being provided with the necessary care or services, and the implementation of personalized plan of care developed to address their specific needs. Findings include:Record review of Resident #7's face sheet dating 07/20/25 reflected a [AGE] year-old-male with an original admission date of 1/07/20. Diagnoses included pulmonary fibrosis (lung disease characterized by the scarring and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles reviewed for medications stored in 1 of 1 medication rooms reviewed for medication storage. The facility failed to ensure the medication room was locked at 11:21 AM on 07/20/25 This failure could place residents in the facility at risk of drug diversion or misuse of medications leading to harm. The findings included:During an observation at 11:21 AM on 07/20/25, the medication room door was left slightly ajar, allowing this state surveyor to open the door and gain entrance without any key. No employees were in the medication room at that time. This state surveyor stayed by the entrance to the medication room until the ADM walked by at 11:50 AM and was informed the door was slightly ajar. In an interview with the ADM at 11:50 AM on 07/20/25, the ADM stated the medication room door was supposed to be closed and locked when no one was inside the room. The ADM stated the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the right to be free from abuse for one (Resident #1) of five residents reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was free from physical abuse on 01/13/25 when Resident #2 grabbed Resident #1 ' s head with both of his hands and hit Resident #1 ' s head against the wall several times then punched Resident #1 on the left side of his face with a closed fist. This failure could place residents at risk for physical, mental and psychosocial harm. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admission record on 05/14/25 reflected an [AGE] year-old male originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with most recent admission on [DATE]. Resident #1's diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis (paralysis and weakness on one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (stroke or brain injury) affecting left side, vascular dementia (problems with thought processes and memory caused by brain damage from…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that included measurable objectives and time frames to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs, for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for Resident #1 to address the risk for falls and the fall mat. This failure could place the residents at risk of not receiving appropriate interventions and care to meet their current needs. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 12/14/24 reflected a [AGE] year-old female with an original admission date of 11/15/24. Her diagnoses included: hydrocephalus (buildup of fluid in the brain ventricles), encephalopathy (brain dysfunction), muscle wasting and atrophy, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), cognitive communication deficit, acquired…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments for 1 of 5 medication carts located at the nursing station observed for compliance. The facility failed to ensure one medication cart found at the nursing station for residents in the 500/600 hall was not left unlocked and unattended by RN A. This failure could place residents at risk of access and ingestion of non-narcotic medications. Findings were: During an observation on 9/24/2024, at 12:41 p.m., revealed one medication cart was unlocked at the nursing station without a supervised staff in view of the cart. The cart was left unlocked for less than 2 minutes until RN A returned to the cart, no one else was around the cart at the time, and all medications were non-narcotics. During an interview on 9/24/2024 at 12:41 p.m., RN A verbalized the unlocked cart was her cart. She verbalized she thought she locked it before walking to the kitchen. RN A stated it was proper process to lock the carts when the cart is not in view or when not being…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the comprehensive care plans were reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment, for three residents (Resident #14, Resident #30, and Resident #49) of 24 residents whose care plans were reviewed, in that: 1) Resident #14's comprehensive care plan was not revised after being prescribed Albuterol Sulfate Inhalation Nebulization Solution on 5/1/24 to reflect a respiratory plan of care. 2) Resident #30's comprehensive care plan was not revised after her quarterly safe smoking evaluations (assessments) changed. 3) Resident #49's comprehensive care plan failed to include he was a smoker. This failure could place residents at risk for inadequate care. The findings included: 1) Resident #14 Record review of Resident #14s face sheet dated 6/24/24 reflected a [AGE] year-old-female with an original admission date of 4/30/24. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction (stroke that occurs when a blood vessel that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,021 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,021 — penalty dated 2024-05-10

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to WELLSENTIAL HEALTH — 67 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 26 rows in the source record cover these 24 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

11 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 86% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX