Windsor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center of Mcall

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 33% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 110 beds and averages 77.1 residents a day — about 70% occupied, or roughly 33 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.04 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.24 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.85 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.67 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.18 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.27 to 0.19 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-11-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for one of four residents (Resident#1) reviewed for accidents and supervision. The facility failed to provide adequate supervision to Resident#1. Resident #1 fell from the shower chair while care was being provided by CNA A and CNA B and sustained a fracture to right hip. This failure could place residents who require supervision at risk of accidents or injury. Review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 11/06/25 revealed a [AGE] year-old man admitted on [DATE] with a discharge day of 10/28/25 with a diagnoses of unspecified dementia, need for assistance with personal care, age related physical debility, syncope (temporary loss of consciousness caused by a decrease in blood flow to the brain) and collapse, muscle wasting and atrophy (gradual wasting away or shrinkage of an organ, tissue, or muscle), and muscle weakness. Diagnoses included unspecified trochanteric…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who was incontinent of bladder with a suprapubic catheter (flexible tube inserted into the bladder through the abdomen to drain urine) received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections for 1 (Resident #27) of 1 resident reviewed for urinary catheters (a flexible tube used to empty the bladder and collect urine in a drainage bag). The facility failed to place Resident #27's urinary catheter drainage bag below the bladder. This failure could place residents with urinary catheters at risk for urinary tract infections. Record review of Resident #27's face sheet dated 12/03/25 revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] with an original admission date of 02/02/25. Resident #27 had diagnoses of unspecified dementia, hypospadias (a congenital condition in males in which the opening of the urethra is on the underside of the penis), and neuromuscular disfunction of the bladder (the nerves…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation. The facility failed to ensure foods were properly labeled and dated.This failure placed all residents who ate food served by the kitchen at risk of cross contamination and food-borne illness.Observation of the kitchen wall on 12/01/25 at 8:25 AM revealed a jar of spice that was not labeled or dated when opened. Observation of the kitchen preparation counter on 12/01/25 at 8:26 AM revealed a loaf of bread was not labeled or dated when opened. Observation of the freezer on 12/01/25 at 8:27 AM revealed 3 packages of hot dog buns not labeled or dated when opened.Observation of the dry storage room on 12/01/25 at 8:30 AM revealed a can of cranberry sauce not dated when delivered. In an interview on 12/01/25 at 8:47 AM, the DM stated that all staff were responsible for ensuring items were stored, labeled and dated. The DM stated every item opened should…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to have evidence that all alleged violations were thoroughly investigated and failed to prevent further potential abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment while the investigation was in progress for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for neglect. The facility failed to thoroughly investigate a reported fall which could have led to a correlation of a fracture which was confirmed on 09/29/25. This failure could place residents at risk of further abuse, physical harm, mental anguish and emotional distress.Review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 11/06/25 revealed a [AGE] year-old man admitted on [DATE] with a discharge day of 10/28/25 with a diagnoses of unspecified dementia, need for assistance with personal care, age related physical debility, syncope (temporary loss of consciousness caused by a decrease in blood flow to the brain) and collapse, muscle wasting and atrophy (gradual wasting away or shrinkage of an organ, tissue, or muscle), and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-07-09 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents had the right to be free from abuse, neglect and misappropriation of property for 8 of 16 residents (Resident #4, Resident #9, Resident #12, Resident #15, Resident #20, Resident #23, Resident #27, and Resident #31) reviewed for abuse, in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #4, Resident #9, Resident #12, Resident #15, Resident #20, Resident #23, Resident #27, and Resident #31 were free from abuse when:-Resident #9 touched/rubbed Resident #4's private area with his hand on 10/19/24.-Resident #12 kissed Resident #20 on her mouth and forehead on 04/03/25.-Resident #12 kissed Resident #4 on her mouth on 04/05/25.-Resident #23 kissed Resident #4 on her mouth on 05/02/25.-Resident #31 punched Resident #15 on her lower back/buttocks area and Resident #15 hit Resident #31 on his shoulder blade on 06/21/25.-Resident #27 kissed Resident #23 on his mouth on 06/25/25. These deficient practices could affect residents and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, or mistreatment, were reported immediately to the State Survey Agency, within two hours if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, for 2 of 16 (Resident #15 and Resident #4) residents reviewed for abuse/neglect, in that: The facility failed to report allegations of resident abuse for Resident #15 and Resident #4 to the State Survey Agency within the allotted time frame of 2 hours on 04/24/25 when Resident #15 pulled Resident #4's hair. This failure could place all residents at increased risk for potential abuse due to unreported allegations of abuse and neglect.The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #15's face sheet, dated 07/08/25, revealed the resident was an [AGE] year-old female who was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-09-12 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident was not given a psychotropic drug unless the medication was necessary to treat a specific condition as diagnosed and documented in the clinical record for 3 ( Resident #34, Resident# 59, and Resident #25) of 4 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, in that: 1.Resident #34 was receiving Prozac (an antidepressant) without adequate indication for its use or an appropriate diagnosis. 2. The facility failed to have an adequate diagnosis or indication for the use of the medication Gabapentin (anti-epileptic drug, used for seizures and some types of pain, with off-label use of anxiety, insomnia, and bipolar disorder) for Resident #59. 3. Resident #25 was prescribed a psychotropic drug for anxiety without a documented diagnosis of anxiety in the clinical record. This failure could place residents at risk of receiving unnecessary psychotropic medications. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #34's Face Sheet dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to formulate advance directives for 1 (Resident #72) of 8 residents reviewed for advance directives. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #72's Advance Directive was signed by the family representative and code status was entered as DNR in the records at the facility. This failure could place the residents at risk of not having their end of life wishes honored, such as receiving unwanted resuscitative measures. Findings included: Record review of Resident #72's face sheet dated 09/12/24 reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female that was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included Metabolic encephalopathy (a brain dysfunction caused by an underlying condition), repeated falls, Alzheimer's Disease (a gradual decline in memory, thinking, behavior and social skills), unspecified, Hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol and triglycerides), unspecified, Age-related physical debility, Depression, Essential…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level I residents with mental illness were provided with a PASRR Evaluation assessment for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #28) reviewed for preadmission screenings. The facility failed to refer Resident #28 for PASRR Evaluation after a positive PASRR 1 screening. This failure could place residents at risk of receiving inadequate care. Findings included: Record review of Resident #28's admission record dated 09/12/24 revealed a [AGE] year-old male with an original admission date on 09/10/2020 and a readmission on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Major Depressive Disorder, Bipolar Disorder, Other specified anxiety disorders, and Delusional Disorders. Record review of Resident #28's care plan identified on pg. 12 a problem dated 02/12/2024 of behavior problem related to Mood Disorder, Delusional Disorder, Bipolar Disorder. Resident will at times asks repetitively for assistance when needs have been met…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure any drug regimen irregularities reported by the Pharmacist Consultant were acted upon, for one (Resident #53) of five residents whose medications were reviewed. The facility's Pharmacy Consultant recommended the physician consider a GDR for the Keppra and the Trazodone on 05/30/24. The facility failed to ensure the physician documented his rationale for not making any changes to Resident #53's medication therapy. This failure could place residents receiving psychotropic medications at risk for adverse consequences and could cause a decline in their physical, mental, and psychosocial condition. The findings were: Record review of Resident #53's Face Sheet dated 09/12/24 revealed Resident #53 was admitted to facility on 11/28/23. Resident #53 was a [AGE] year-old female with diagnoses of unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety (loss of cognitive functioning),…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infection for 2 (Resident #16 and Resident #45) of 16 residents reviewed for infection control, in that: 1. The facility failed to ensure LVN A changed his gloves when moving from a dirty to clean task during wound care on Resident #16. 2. The facility failed to ensure LVN D cleaned the stethoscope prior to checking placement of peg tube during the task of medication administration on Resident #45. These failures could place resident at risk for infection due to improper care practices. Findings included: 1.Review of Resident #16's Face Sheet, dated 09/12/2024, reflected resident was an [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE], with an initial admitted date of 05/07/2021. Relevant diagnoses included Pressure Ulcer of Sacral Region, Stage 4,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$24,083 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $24,083 — penalty dated 2025-11-21

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to WELLSENTIAL HEALTH — 67 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 32 rows in the source record cover these 23 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

11 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 96% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX