No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Windsor Quail Valley Post-Acute Healthcare

3640 Hampton Dr, Missouri City, TX 77459 · Non profit - Corporation · 120 certified beds · (281) 778-5144 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0607, F0610) — most recent Feb 20243 immediate-jeopardy citations1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$52,036 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0607, F0610) — most recent Feb 2024
  • inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (16) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $52,036 in federal fines (most recent 2024-07-19)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
3550 FM 1092 Rd · (855) 748-7246 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walgreens0.2 mi
6120 Highway 6 · (281) 208-5828 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Kroger0.3 mi
6200 Highway 6 · (281) 208-1737 · Call to confirm hours
Park
3434 FM 1092 Rd · (281) 403-8637 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased15.2%15.8%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight0.9%3.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.8%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%2.4%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.5%3.3%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened11.0%14.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication11.6%18.0%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.2%3.8%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control12.8%13.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table9.3%9.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%88.0%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission22.9%25.7%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit21.4%12.3%12.0%worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 68 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

55.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
53.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.21U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.10hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 53.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 28 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 25% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF55.0%CMS range 42.2–66.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.7%CMS range 9.7–18.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge53.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge64.3%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge46.4%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified59.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.7%CMS range 3.7–11.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.261.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.40
RN hours/ resident / day
0.72
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.98
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.09
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.29
RN hoursweekends
41.7%
Total nursing turnover
38.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 95.0 residents a day — about 79% occupied, or roughly 25 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.09 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.40 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.98 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.76 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.23 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.44 to 0.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

4
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-05-14)
2
at the previous standard inspection (2025-03-06)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-07-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received care, consistent with professional standards of practice to identify, prevent pressure ulcers from developing and promote healing for 1 (Resident CR# 1) of 9 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility failed to prevent, identify, and treat pressure sores on Resident CR#1's right buttock and right hip. CR #1 was sent to the hospital after family intervention, and there it was determined she had an unstageable wound to her buttocks and a stage 3 wound to her hip. The noncompliance was identified as Past Non-Compliant. The IJ began on 07/13/2024 and ended on 07/16/2024. The facility corrected the non-compliance before the survey began. This failure placed residents who were at risk of developing wounds of delayed identification, treatment, hospitalization, surgeries, infection, a decline in health, and pain. Findings included: Record review of Resident CR #1's admission face sheet undated revealed she was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-02-29 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Abbreviations: ADMIN - Administrator ADON-Assistant Director of Nursing AS-Agency Staff BIMS-Brief Interview for Mental Status MA- Medical Aides CNA-Certified Nursing Assistant CR-Closed Record CW-Confidential Witness DON - Director of Nursing DORC - Director of Resident Care ED - Executive Director ERN - emergency room Nurse EMS-Emergency Medical Services EMT-Emergency Medical Technician FM-Family Member HHSC-Health and Human Services Commission IJ-Immediate Jeopardy IT-Immediate Threat LE-Law Enforcement LVN-Licensed Vocational Nurse PD- Police Dept MD-Medical Doctor MT - Resident Med Tech NP- Nurse Practitioner R-Resident RA-Resident Assistant RN-Registered Nurse RP-Responsible Party Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for 1 resident (CR#1) of 5 residents reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to ensure each resident was free from abuse when CR#1 was physically abused by CNA C on 2/20/2024 around 6:30am, which was the time CNA A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-02-29 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement abuse and neglect policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation of residents for 1 (CR#1) of 5 residents reviewed for abuse by not implementing their abuse policy to prohibit and prevent abuse by conducting an investigation immediately; thus, failing to protect resident when there is a warranted suspicion of abuse and identifying staff responsible for the investigation. The facility failed to ensure each resident was free from abuse when CR#1 was physically abused by CNA C on 2/20/2024 around 6:30am, which was the time CNA A started her morning shift and observed the bruising to CR#1's face. These failures placed residents at risk of physical harm, emotional distress, mental anguish and death from possible abuse and neglect. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 02/23/2024 at 5:42 PM. While the IJ was removed on 02/24/2024 at 8:43PM, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-02-29 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have evidence that all alleged violations of abuse were thoroughly investigated, to prevent further potential abuse or mistreatment while the investigation was in progress, and report the result of all investigations to other officials in accordance with State law, including to the State Survey Agency within 5 working days of the incident for 1 of 5 residents (CR #1) reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to complete the investigation of the allegation of abuse, report the results of the investigation to HHSC within 5 days, and prevent further potential abuse while the investigation was in progress when CR #1 was found with suspicious injuries of unknown origin. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 02/26/2024 at 1:48pm. While the IJ was lowered on 02/27/2024 at 6:00pm, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy due to the facility's need…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gdisputed · IDR2026-06-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that Resident#1 received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the residents' choices for 1 of 10 residents (Resident# 1) reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to provide necessary care and services to maintain the highest practicable physical well-being for Resident #1, who was totally dependent on staff for all ADL's, failing to provide adequate bathing, hygiene, and skin care services. This failure placed residents at risk for development of infection, pain, impaired skin integrity, and a decreased quality of care, resulting in actual harm and the potential for further physical decline.Findings included:Record review of Resident #1 undated face sheet revealed an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility initially on 3.16.22 and re-admitted on 5.13.26 with diagnosis of Non-Alzheimer's Dementia (declined in cognitive abilities), and Epilepsy (recurrent, unprovoked…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-14 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program (PASARR) to the maximum extent practicable to avoid duplicative testing and effort for 1 of 1 (Resident #2) reviewed for PASARR. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 who had a diagnosis of mental illness, received a positive PASARR Level I and PASARR Level II screening. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving needed care and services, causing a possible decline in mental health. Findings include: Record review of Resident #2's face sheet reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. The resident's diagnosis included depression (serious mood disorder that causes persistent sadness, and loss of interest in activities), mood disorder due to known physiological condition with mixed features (symptoms of depression and mania or hypomania), memory deficit following…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-14 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 3 residents (Residents #21) and 1 of 3 (CMA Q) staff observed during medication administration. The facility failed to ensure staff clarified the order for Resident #21's Miralax prior to administering the medication on 05/13/2026. The failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the intended therapeutic benefit. Findings included: Record review of Resident #21's undated admission record revealed a [AGE] year-old female with an admission date of 05/31/2024. Resident #21 diagnoses included dysphagia (trouble swallowing), gastro-esophageal reflux disease (a chronic digestive condition where stomach acid or bile repeatedly flows back into the food pipe, irritating its lining), muscle wasting, and cerebral infarction (blockage in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 1 (WCN) staff observed for infection control practices. The facility failed to ensure WCN followed proper infection control procedures after she completed a wound care procedure on 05/14/2026. The failure could place residents and staff at risk of infections. Findings included:During an observation on 05/14/2026 at 9:12 a.m., the WCN completed wound care, and while she still had her yellow gown on, and held a trash bag that contained the soiled supplies and dressings. The WCN left the room and went to the treatment cart, she logged in to her computer that was on top of the cart, opened the treatment cart using the cart key, and grabbed a red trash bag (used to dispose trash from isolation rooms) out of the treatment cart and disposed the regular trash bag inside the red trash bag and placed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services including procedures to accurately administer medications to meet the needs of each resident 1 (Resident #1) of 6 reviewed for pharmacy services. -RN A instructed CNA B to administer Resident #1's medication Eliquis. This failure placed residents at risk for medication errors. Findings: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 12/02/25 revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted again on 09/08/25. Resident #1's diagnoses included the following: chronic kidney failure, colostomy (surgical procedure that creates a new way for waste to exit the body into a bag), sepsis (infection), type 2 diabetes mellitus (when the body does not utilize sugar efficiently in the body for energy), abnormalities of gait and mobility, and rhabdomyolysis (condition where damaged muscle tissue breaks down, releasing harmful proteins and electrolytes {tiny particles in the body that carry…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide the necessary services to maintain personal care for one of seven residents (Resident #19) reviewed for ADL care in that: -Resident #19 waited over an hour to receive incontinent care. -The call light activator switch was placed out of reach. -During that hour, three staff entered and exited the room without assisting the resident with incontinent care. -One staff turned off the call light and left the room. The deficient practice could cause residents at risk of not receiving the care as needed and place them at higher risk for skin breakdown. Findings included: Record review of the admission Record for Resident #19 revealed he was [AGE] years old and was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, quadriplegia (loss of use of all four extremities), anxiety disorder, and muscle wasting and atrophy. Record review of the MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #19 scored 10/15 on the BIMS,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 resident (Resident #19) of 7 residents reviewed for infeciton control. -Staff provided incontinent care for the resident and did not practice hand hygiene prior to repositioning the resident and arranging the linens. The deficient practice placed the residents at risk for infection. Findings included: Record review of the admission Record for Resident #19 revealed he was [AGE] years old and was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, quadriplegia (loss of use of all four extremities), anxiety disorder, and muscle wasting and atrophy. Record review of the MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #19 scored 10/15 on the BIMS, indicative of moderately impaired…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and records reviewed, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promoteds maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, for 1 (Resident #1) of 6 residents reviewed for resident rights. -The facility failed to allow Resident #1 to exercise his right to choose that CNA B not provide him care. This failure could place residents at risk for decreased feelings of self-worth and dignity. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admission Record, dated 07/31/2024, revealed a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses included bipolar disorder (a mental health condition that causes extreme mood swings between emotional highs and lows), intervertebral disc disorders with myelopathy (injury to the spinal cord caused by severe compression), spinal stenosis (condition in which the spaces in the spine narrow, compressing the spinal cord), muscle…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary services to maintain grooming and personal care for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for ADL care. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 received proper grooming, including hair washing, three times a week (Monday, Wednesday and Friday) as per her bed bath and shower schedule. 2. The facility failed to address Resident#1's refusal to have her hair washed with FM on 3/6/2024. These failures could place Residents at risk for skin breakdown, infection, and loss of self-esteem. Findings Included: Record review of the undated Face Sheet for Resident#1 revealed, a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of apraxia (a motor speech disorder that makes it hard to speak), hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body), Cerebrovascular Disease (a group of conditions that affect the blood vessels of the brain, usually caused by having…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-29 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Tag:842 S/S= D Surveyor Name(s): [NAME] Immediate Supervisor: [NAME] Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain clinical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices that are complete and accurately documented for 1 of 5 Residents (CR#1) reviewed for clinical records accuracy, there was only one progress note Record Review of the Progress Notes for CR#1: There was only one progress note entered since 1/3/2024; then, on 2/21/2024 at 16:17 (4:17pm), there was a note which was titled Admin Note and stated the Administrator notified FM of the HHSC investigation on 2/21/2024 with allegations of abuse. The facility failed to maintain an accurate record by indicating CR #1's unexplained or unknown eye injury, what medical staff did after observing the injury, who they called and the type of assessment completed. This deficient practice could affect residents whose records are maintained by the facility and could place resident(s) at risk for errors in care and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-12 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility did not provide, in writing, a bed-hold notice upon transfer at the time of transfer of a resident to a hospital or for therapeutic leave, for 1 of 3 residents (CR#1) reviewed for transfers and discharge. -The facility failed to provide bed-hold notifications to CR#1 when she was transferred to the hospital. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving notice of the facility's bed hold policy before being transferred. Findings included: Record review of CR#1's Face Sheet (undated) revealed, a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: spinal stenosis (a narrowing of the spinal canal), pneumonia (infection that inflames air sacs in one or both lungs, which may fill with fluid) and hypokalemia (a blood level that is below normal in potassium). CR#1 was transferred to an acute care hospital on [DATE]. Record review of CR#1's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 15 out of 15…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2026-05-14 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to dispose of garbage and refused properly for trash bins A and B reviewed for garbage disposal. - The facility failed to ensure the dumpster doors were secured on trash bin. - The facility failed to ensure trash bags were off the ground and in dumpster trash bins. This failure could place residents at risk of infections, pests and rodents from improperly disposed garbage.Findings included: Observation on 05/12/2026 at 07:46 a.m., multiple trash bags were observed on the ground in front of the 2 dumpster trash bins located outside of the facility. One of 2 doors open were left open. During an interview on 05/12/2026 at 01:08 p.m., the Regional Director of dietary services stated the trash was normally not left in that condition. She stated it may have been a new staff member who left the trash bags in front of the bins. She stated the kitchen staff were aware that trash bags should not be left outside of the trash bins, however multiple departments utilized garbage disposal bins. She stated it was important to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$52,036 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $15,642 — penalty dated 2024-07-19
  • $36,394 — penalty dated 2024-02-29

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to WELLSENTIAL HEALTH — 67 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.7+0.3 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.9+0.1 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 51.6+0.4 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.2-0.2 vs chain
The other 66 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.7★, per CMS)
1 of 5Bastrop Lost Pines Nursing and Rehabilitation CentBastrop, TX 1 of 5Briarcliff Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterMcAllen, TX 1 of 5Brownsville Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterBrownsville, TX 1 of 5Fort Worth Transitional Care CenterFort Worth, TX 1 of 5Hidalgo Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterEdinburg, TX 1 of 5Houston Heights Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterHouston, TX 1 of 5Jefferson Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterBeaumont, TX 1 of 5Laredo West Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterLaredo, TX 1 of 5Lavaca Bay Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterPort Lavaca, TX 1 of 5Longview Hill Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterLongview, TX 1 of 5Spindletop Hill Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterBeaumont, TX 1 of 5Town and Country Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterBoerne, TX 1 of 5Wharton Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterWharton, TX 1 of 5Windsor Nursing And Rehabilitation Center Of RaymoRaymondville, TX 2 of 5Brenham Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterBrenham, TX 2 of 5Cityview Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterFort Worth, TX 2 of 5Corpus Christi Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterCorpus Christi, TX 2 of 5Edinburg Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterEdinburg, TX 2 of 5Elgin Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterElgin, TX 2 of 5Guadalupe Valley Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterSeguin, TX 2 of 5Hallettsville Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterHallettsville, TX 2 of 5Heritage Park Rehabilitation And Skilled Nursing CAustin, TX 2 of 5Live Oak Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterGeorge West, TX 2 of 5Maverick Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterEagle Pass, TX 2 of 5Memorial City Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterHouston, TX 2 of 5Robstown Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterRobstown, TX 2 of 5Southpark Meadows Nursing and Rehabilitation CenteAustin, TX 2 of 5Windsor AtriumHarlingen, TX 2 of 5Windsor Nursing And Rehabilitation Center Of SeguiSeguin, TX 2 of 5Windsor Nursing And Rehabilitation Center Of WeslaWeslaco, TX 2 of 5Windsor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center of AliceAlice, TX 2 of 5Windsor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center of BastrBastrop, TX 2 of 5Windsor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center of MorgaCorpus Christi, TX 2 of 5Yoakum Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterYoakum, TX 3 of 5Harlingen Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterHarlingen, TX 3 of 5Magnolia Crossing Nursing and Rehabilitation CenteHouston, TX 3 of 5Port Lavaca Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterPort Lavaca, TX 3 of 5The Woodlands Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterThe Woodlands, TX 3 of 5Val Verde Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterDel Rio, TX 3 of 5Windsor Mission OaksSan Antonio, TX

Showing 40 of 66; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
OAKBEND MEDICAL CENTEROrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 01/28/2015
BAIRD, DANIELIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 04/13/2021
CLAPP, BARBARAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 06/01/2021
CORTESE, DARENIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 08/10/2021
CRAYTON, TOMIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 01/15/2013
DORMAN, JOHNIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 01/18/2022
FREUDENBERGER, JOSEPHIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/28/2015
GIBSON, PATRICIAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 08/01/2021
HALEY, JEFFIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 07/15/2016
HUGHES, RUSTONIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 01/01/2024
KING, ABBYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 01/23/2018
KING, ELIZABETHIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 01/17/2023
MANDELBAUM, ELLIOTIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 01/01/2025
PISANI, ADAMIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 01/15/2019
POPATIA, AMIRALIIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 03/17/2020
STUART, JULIUSIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 01/16/2023
UTHMAN, EDWARDIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 01/15/2008
REGENCY IHS OF WINDSOR QUAIL VALLEY, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2015
REGENCY INTEGRATED HEALTH SERVICES LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2015
DEKOWSKI, DONOVANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2015
JOHNSON, DEMONIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/11/2021
3640 HAMPTON DRIVE LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2015
CSV RHEA MANAGEMENT HOLDCO, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2015
DWD TX HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2015
JACK AND NANCY DWYER WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT CENTER INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2015
REG BRIDGE OPCO LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2015
REG HG OPCO LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2015
REG OPERATOR HOLDCO LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2015
REGENCY IHS CLINICAL CONSULTING, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2015
REGENCY IHS REHAB LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2015
REGENCY TEXAS HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2015
GIBBS, CHRISTINAIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
JACOBS, ROSAIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
LOCKHART, CHRISTOPHERIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 41 rows in the source record cover these 34 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

13 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-1.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 85%Medicare 6%Other / private 9%

About 85% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$221per resident / day
operating cost
$6,709per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$218per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Texas
$5,627/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,666/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 676371. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-14, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next