Bellflower Post Acute
9710 E. Artesia Ave, Bellflower, CA 90706 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 59 certified beds · (562) 925-2274 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (25% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (45) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 9.3% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 0.9% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.7% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.6% | 1.2% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 14.8% | 7.3% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.0% | 1.6% | 3.3% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 2.5% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 7.8% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.1% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 7.7% | 4.3% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 2.0% | 10.2% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 14.3% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.4% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 23.5% | 23.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 9.8% | 11.2% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.26 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.41 | 1.57 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
44.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 183 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 63.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 125 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.88 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 96% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 44.9%CMS range 39.5–52.3 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 13.0%CMS range 9.9–17.4 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 63.2% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 48.8% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 40.8% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 58.4% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 74.8% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 93.1% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.5% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.0%CMS range 5.6–12.1 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.44 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 59 beds and averages 53.1 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.18 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.60 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.92 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.56 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.43 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.66 to 0.44 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 25% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
45 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 35 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure their ice machine - used to produce ice for resident distribution and consumption - was clean for safe and sanitary operation.This failure had the potential to result in at least 50 out of 56 residents in the facility suffering waterborne illness, increasing the risk for negative outcomes such as nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and dehydration.Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on April 15, 2026, at 1:55 PM with the Maintenance Director (MS) in the facility's kitchen, the facility's ice machine was observed for inspection. The following was observed during the facility ice machine's internal components inspection:- The ice cube product chute underneath the machine's ice cube forming plate, where the formed ice cube product deposited through to enter and rest in the machine's ice collection bin, contained white-colored matter that could be removed by hand with a folded paper towel.- Along the interior wall of the ice machine's housing, enclosing a section of the ice cube product chute's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to follow their Quality Assurance (QA) /Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI]-a data driven proactive approach to improvement used to ensure services are meeting quality standards) to develop a corrective action plan or performance activities to address problems and opportunities for improvement.This had the potential to result in unsafe practices and harm to the residents.Findings:During a concurrent interview and record review on 4/16/2026 at 2:38 p.m. with the Administrator (ADM), the facility's QAPI binder was reviewed. The ADM stated the facility has identified falls, pressure injuries, and legionella water management as active QAPI topics. The ADM stated falls and pressure injury interventions and corrective actions are implemented on an individual level. The ADM did not provide documented plans or corrective actions that the facility has implemented to address falls, pressure injuries, and legionella water management.During a concurrent interview and record review on 4/16/2026 at 3:30 p.m. with the ADM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the call light device was within reach for one of eight sampled residents (Resident 53).This failure had the potential to prevent Resident 53 from receiving necessary care and services. Findings:During an observation on 4/13/2026, at 9:43 a.m., in Resident 53's room, Resident 53's call light was wrapped around the plug on the wall. Resident 53's right hand groped for something constantly.During a review of Resident 53's admission record, the admission record indicated Resident 53 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including legal blindness (severe visual impairment or low vision), deafness (hearing loss that precludes a person from understanding spoken language), and congenital Rubella Syndrome (CRS- a condition occurring in newborns when a pregnant woman contracts the rubella virus, leading to severe, often permanent birth defects like heart issues, blindness, and deafness).During a review of Resident 53's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents or responsible party ([RP] individual that exercises ultimate control, management, or decision-making authority over a business, asset, or legal obligation) had the opportunity to formulate an advance directive for three of four sampled residents (Resident 1, Resident 6, and Resident 25).This deficient practice had the potential to violate the resident's right to be fully informed of the option to formulate their advance directives and cause conflict with the residents' wishes regarding health care. Findings: A. During a review of Resident 6's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 6 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute respiratory failure (condition where the lungs are unable to adequately deliver oxygen to the blood or remove carbon dioxide) with hypoxia (when the body or a specific part does not receive enough oxygen to maintain normal function),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 8 and Resident 42) were provided the Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNF ABN - written notice issued by the facility to inform the resident of the cost of services that Medicare [federally funded health insurance for individuals aged 65 or older] may not cover and the reason why) in a manner the resident's understood. This deficient practice had the potential to result in violating the residents' rights to appeal the Medicare decision and cause financial burden on Resident 8 and Resident 42.Findings:A. During a review of Resident 8's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 8 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including polyneuropathy (damage of the nerves that can cause weakness, numbness, and burning pain), cellulitis (infection of the skin) of right lower limb, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify, assess, monitor, and document the use of abdominal binder (a wide, elastic compression belt worn around the abdomen is used with patients who have removed essential lines or tubes on more than one occasion) to prevent the resident from pulling out the gastrostomy tube ([G-tube]- a tube inserted through the belly that brings nutrition directly to the stomach) for one of eight sampled residents (Resident 7).These failures had the potential to result in entrapment, skin injury/breakdown, and compromised circulation.Findings:During an observation on 4/13/2026, at 11:26 a.m., in Resident 7's room, there was splint (a medical device that stabilizes a part of your body and holds it in place) for Resident 7's right hand and right arm and abdominal binder on Resident 7 was noted. Resident 7 had difficulty moving the right arm and both legs. Resident 7 was able to move left arm but noted weakness.During a review of Resident 7's admission…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate resident assessments and the status were reflected on medical records for one of three sampled residents (Resident 7) by failing to ensure the assessment entries on the Minimum Data Set (MDS-a resident assessment tool) for abdominal binder (a wide, elastic compression belt worn around the abdomen is used with patients who have removed essential lines or tubes on more than one occasion) that was a physical restraint (any manual method, physical/mechanical device, or medication used to intentionally limit a patient's movement, freedom, or normal access to their body) was accurately reflected and documented.This failure had the potential to result in a negative effect on Resident 7's plan of care and delivery of necessary services, care, and treatment.Findings:During an observation on 4/13/2026, at 11:26 a.m., in Resident 7's room, there was an abdominal binder on Resident 7. Resident 7 had difficulty moving right arm and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for two of eight sampled residents (Resident 5 and Resident 7) by failing to:A. Develop a comprehensive care plan for Gentamicin (medication to treat severe bacterial infections) for Resident 5.B. Implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for abdominal binder (a wide, elastic compression belt worn around the abdomen is used with patients who have removed essential lines or tubes on more than one occasion) use for Resident 7.These failures had the potential to result in Resident 5 and Resident 7's needs not being met, affecting the residents' well-being, and poor patient outcomes.Findings: A. During a review of Resident 5's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 5 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including end stage renal disease (ESRD - chronic kidney disease that causes gradual loss of kidney…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided with a communication board (a device that displays photos, symbols, or illustrations to help people with limited language skills express themselves) and language translating service with the language that the resident was able to understand for one of eight sample residents (Resident 58).These failures had the potential to result in preventing Resident 58 from communicating with the staff and had the potential to delay receiving appropriate care/treatment and safety for Resident 58.Findings:During a record review of Resident 58's admission Record, the admission record indicated Resident 58 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including malignant neoplasm of breast (cancerous, abnormal cell growth arising from breast tissue), chronic pain, and history of falling.During a review of Resident 58's History and Physical (H&P), dated 4/13/2026, the H&P indicated, Resident 58 had no capacity to make…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to properly store medications safely in a locked crash cart (a supply cart stocked with equipment and medications used for emergency situations) located by Nursing station 1.This had the potential to result in adverse medication effects, medication tampering and medication theft.Findings: During an observation on 4/13/2026 at 10:22 a.m., the crash cart located across from nursing station 1 was observed unattended with a key inserted in the lock of the cart. During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/13/2026 at 10:28 a.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, the crash cart was observed with the key inserted in the lock of the cart. LVN 1 stated the crash cart had a box of glucose gels (medication used to treat rapid-onset low blood sugar in residents with diabetes) and normal saline syringes (pre-filled syringe, used to clear, maintain, or assess the patency of intravenous (IV) catheter) located in the top drawer. LVN 1 stated the key are always left in the lock of the crash cart so that it is available…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 35 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food served was palatable (food or drink that is pleasant, savory, or agreeable to the taste) and/or at the preferred temperature for three of 54 sampled residents (Resident 19, Resident 60, and Resident 53).This failure had the potential for residents' poor meal intake and which could lead to weight loss. Findings:A. During a review of Resident 19's admission record, the admission record indicated Resident 19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including Diabetes Mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and essential hypertension (high blood pressure that is not due to another medical condition).During a review of Resident 19's History and Physical (H&P), dated 1/1/2026, the H&P indicated, Resident 19 had the capacity (ability) to understand and make decisions.During a review of Resident 19's Minimum Data Set (MDS-a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their antibiotic stewardship policy for one of three sampled residents (Resident 5) when the facility did not inform the physician when Resident 5, who was prescribed gentamicin (antibiotic to treat bacterial infections) eye drops did not meet McGeer's criteria (criteria used to detect infections based on symptoms and laboratory values).This resulted in Resident 5 receiving inappropriate antibiotic eye drops and the potential to develop antibiotic resistance.Findings: During a review of Resident 5's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 5 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including end stage renal disease (ESRD - chronic kidney disease that causes gradual loss of kidney function), dependence on renal dialysis (a treatment to cleanse the blood of wastes and extra fluids artificially through a machine), and cellulitis (infection of the skin).During a review of Resident 5's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to educate and offer the COVID-19 vaccination for the 2025-2026 respiratory season for two of five sampled staff (Physician 1 and Physician 2).These failures had the potential to result in spreading the COVID-19 virus throughout the facility. Findings:During a concurrent interview and record review on 4/15/2026 at 10:26 a.m. with the Infection Prevention Nurse (IPN), the staff vaccination records were reviewed. The IPN stated there was no documentation that Physician 1 and Physician 2 were offered the COVID-19 vaccination for the 2025-2026 respiratory season and educated on the risks and benefits of receiving the vaccination. The IPN stated both Physician 1 and Physician 2 actively cared for current residents.During an interview on 4/16/2026 at 1:52 p.m. with Registered Nurse Supervisor (RNS) 1, RNS 1 stated it was important to offer the COVID-19 vaccine and educate all staff to prevent the spread of the COVID-19 virus to residents. RNS 1 state the COVID-19 consent form is proof that the facility encouraged and educated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-10-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation. interview and record review, the facility failed to implement infection control measures by failing to:A. Ensure implementing the water management plan (comprehensive plan aimed to prevent waterborne illnesses by controlling germs in the water) by monitoring and documenting control measures (actions taken to eliminate or reduce the likelihood or severity of exposure to a hazard) and limit (a specific, measurable, and quantitative range for a particular parameter that indicates when a water system is operating acceptably).B. Identify, follow through, and report Resident 1's positive result of Legionella (a type of bacteria that is naturally found in [NAME] environments) Urine Antigen Test [UAT-a diagnostic test used to detect Legionella (bacteria in the urine of individuals suspected of having Legionnaires' disease (a severe form of a lung infection called pneumonia that is caused by a bacterium known as legionella)] to California Department of Public Health (CDPH-the state department…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-02-21 · tag F0800 — widespreadProvide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Jello items were stored and maintained at the required temperature of 41-degree Fahrenheit (a temperature scale, range for cold food is below 41 degrees). This failure had the potential to result in food spoilage, compromised taste for residents as proper temperature control is essential to ensure food safety and quality. Findings: During an observation on 2/18/2025 at 11:35 a.m., in the kitchen, observed that the Dietary Supervisor (DS) pulled out one cup of Jello from the refrigerator and checked its temperature, which measured 54 degrees. During an observation on 2/18/2025 at 11:48 a.m., in the kitchen, observed that the DS checked temperature of another Jello, which measured 48 degrees. During an observation on 2/18/2025 at 12:22 p.m. in the kitchen, observed that Dining cart #1, #2 were being transported from the kitchen with the Jello items. Before cart #3 left the kitchen, the DS checked temperature of Jello again, and the thermometer indicated at 48 degrees. During an interview on 2/19/2025,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) Committee, thereby affecting 47 out of 47 residents, failed to identify and implement corrective action to the systemic problems identified: a. Ensure medication parameters are followed when administering medication to residents b. Ensure dialysis (a treatment to cleanse the blood of wastes and extra fluids artificially through a machine when the kidney(s) have failed) residents are assessed before departing for dialysis and after residents return from outpatient dialysis. c. Ensure the kitchen store, prepare and distribute food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. These deficient practices placed the residents at risk for not receiving the quality treatment necessary to adequately meet their highest practicable well-being. Findings: During an interview on 2/21/2025 at 9:26 a.m., with the Administrator (ADM), the ADM stated the following systemic issues identified were not identified by the QAA committee: a) ensure medication parameters are followed wen medicating…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-21 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nurses would document resident's pain level before removing pain medication from inventory, and document resident's refusal of administration, for one of one residents (Resident 43). This deficient practice had the potential of medication error and/or narcotic diversion. Findings: During an observation at the medication cart 1 on 2/19/25 at 3:45 PM, there was a multiple-dose blister pill pack (bubble pack) for Resident 43. The medications in the bubble pack were labeled as oxycodone with acetaminophen (generic for Percocet, a potent opioid to treat severe pain) 10/325 milligrams (mg, an unit of measuring mass). During an interview and a concurrent review of Resident 43's controlled drug record (an accountability record or count sheet for narcotics) for Percocet, the licensed vocational nurse (LVN 3) stated the count sheet indicated there were two doses marked wasted, one each on 12/4/24 (no time noted) and 2/13/25 (6 AM). LVN 3 reviewed Resident 43's electronic medication administration record (eMAR) and stated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-21 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — patternEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to appropriately assess and monitor one of one sampled resident (Resident 15) during the use of an abdominal binder (a wide belt that provides light compression around the stomach) placed over Resident 15's a gastrostomy (g-tube: a surgical opening fitted with a device to allow feedings to be administered directly to the stomach common for people with swallowing problems). This deficient practice had the potential to place the resident on unnecessary restraints. Findings: During a review of Resident 15's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 15 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including gastrostomy, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and Huntington's Disease (a progressive inherited neurodegenerative disorder that affects the brain). During a review of Resident 15's History and Physical (H&P), dated 6/22/2024, the H&P indicated Resident 15 did not have the capacity to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled resident's (Resident 37) care plans were reviewed and updated on a quarterly basis. This deficient practice had the potential to result in poor quality of care and a delay in care and services. Findings: During a review of Resident 37's admission Record, the admission record indicated Resident 37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including acute respiratory failure (when the air sacs of the lungs cannot release enough oxygen into the blood), type 2 diabetes (long-term condition in which the body has trouble controlling blood sugar and using it for energy), hypertension (condition in which the force of the blood against the artery walls is too high), and dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities). During a review of Resident 37's Minimum Data Set ([MDS] a resident assessment tool) dated 11/8/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 37's cognition (ability to think and reason) was moderately…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-21 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based onobservation, interview and record review, the facility failed to 1.Ensure nurses would document resident's pain level before removing pain medication from inventory, and document resident's refusal of administration, for one of one residents (Resident 43). These deficient practices had the potential of medication error and/or narcotic diversion. 2. Ensure one of one sampled residenst (Resident 48) had a urology (a medical specialty that focuses on the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of diseases and disorders related to the urinary system) consult and received services to meet professional standards of practice. These failures had the potential for Resident 48's penile (located on the penis) open wound to get infected. Findings: 1. During an observation at the medication cart 1 on 2/19/25 at 3:45 PM, there was a multiple-dose blister pill pack (bubble pack) for Resident 43. The medications in the bubble pack were labeled as oxycodone with acetaminophen (generic for Percocet, a potent opioid to treat…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-21 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — patternProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents' (Resident 5) foley catheter (a device that drains urine from your urinary bladder into a collection bag outside of your) drainage bag was changed as ordered. This deficient practice had the potential to result in complications that can negatively affect the resident's wellbeing. Findings: During a review of Resident 5's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 5 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute kidney failure (A condition in which the kidneys suddenly can't filter waste from the blood), and acute cystitis (infection of the bladder - organ that holds the urine). During a review of Resident 5's Minimum Data set (MDS), A resident assessment tool, dated 1/15/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 5's cognitive skills (functions your brain uses to think, pay attention, process information, and remember things) for daily decision-making was intact. The MDS indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-21 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not provide care and services consistent with professional standards of practice to three of three residents (Resident 5, 30, 49) receiving supplemental oxygen (element essential for life) when the facility failed to: a. Ensure Resident 5 had visible signage warning others oxygen was in use to prevent hazardous practices. b. Ensure Resident 30 and 49's nasal canula (device that delivers oxygen through the nostrils) was labeled with a date to ensure it was changed timely. c. Ensure Resident 30's oxygen use was being documented in the Medication administration record. These deficient practices had the potential to result in unsafe and unsanitary administration of oxygen in the facility. Findings: a) During a review of Resident 5's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 5 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute respiratory failure (life-threatening condition that occurs when the lungs and blood are…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-21 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — patternProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure three of three Residents on hemodialysis ([HD]a treatment to cleanse the blood of wastes and extra fluids artificially through a machine when the kidney(s) have failed) , received dialysis care and services based on professional standards (Resident 17, 27, and 113). The facility failed to: a. Ensure staff assessed Resident 113 prior to sending Resident 113 to dialysis. b. Ensure Resident 17 had equipment and supplies necessary to manage emergencies such as bleeding at the bedside. c. Ensure staff assessed Resident 27 and 113 after the residents returned from the dialysis center. These deficient practices had the potential to result in undetected complications from dialysis, or delayed treatment of complications. Findings: a.During a review of Resident 113's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 113 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including end stage renal disease (ESRD -irreversible kidney…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-21 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one of three Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 9 ) had the specific competencies and skills sets necessary to care for residents by failing to ensure LVN 9's SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility) Licensed Nurse Orientation Annual Competency checklist (a systematic evaluation of nursing staff's competency levels in various areas of practice) was up to date. This deficient practice had the potential for residents not to receive appropriate nursing services and care which had the potential for injury to residents. Findings: During a record review LVN 9 was hired on 8/22/2023, on 9/18/2023 the form titled SNF Licensed Nurse Orientation Annual Competency Checklist was completed by LVN 9 . During a record review and interview on 2/20/2025 at 11:27 a.m., with the Director of staff Development (DSD), the DSD stated LVN 9's last annual competency check list was completed on 9/18/2023 with an expiration date of 3/31/2024 . The DSD stated LVN 9 was 11 months past due. The DSD stated it was important to make sure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to develop a facility policy that matched the facility's current method of documentation, specifically in the relations to medication administration record. This deficient practice had the potentials of inaccurate records, drug loss and/or diversion. Findings: A review of the facility policy and procedures, Medication Administration-General Guidelines (dated 10/2017), indicated .An explanatory note is entered on the reverse side of the record provided for PRN documentation . During a concurrent interview on 2/20/25 at 12:28 PM, the director of nursing (DON) stated the facility did not have a more updated version of the aforementioned policy. DON stated the facility had been using electronic medication administration records (MAR) and not the paper MAR. DON stated the policy was referred to the paper MAR that was no longer in use. DON stated the current practice is for the nurse to initiate a text box that will populate in the eMAR for documentation. DON agreed the aforementioned policy needs to be updated.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-21 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to hold (not administer) the hypertensive medications (drugs used to treat high blood pressure - condition where the force of blood against the artery walls is too high) for two of three residents (Resident 27 and 112) when the residents blood pressures were below given parameters (sets the condition of providing the medication). This deficient practice had the potential to result in hypotension (condition where the blood pressure falls below normal levels) which can cause fainting or dizziness because the brain does not receive enough blood. Findings: During a review of Resident 112's admission Record, the record indicated Resident 112 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis including essential hypertension (a condition characterized by persistently high blood pressure without an identifiable underlying cause). During a review of Resident 112's Minimum Data Set (MDS), a resident assessment tool, dated 2/11/2025, the MDS indicated Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure active medications for current residents would not be stored in a cabinet labeled for discontinued medicines. 2. Ensure multiple dosed medication container had an open date and outdated medications would not be stored in the medication cart. These deficient practices had the potentials of medication errors, delay in receiving medications, and/or receiving outdated medications. Findings: 1. During an observation on 2/19/25 at 2:59 PM in the medication room located in the nursing station 1 with a licensed vocational nurse (LVN 3), there was a cabinet above the sink and labeled discontinued medicines. Inside the aforementioned cabinet, LVN 3 confirmed there were 17 multiple-dose blister pill packs (bubble packs) in the middle shelf. LVN stated these bubble packs were refill medications appeared to have been delivered within the last week. LVN stated newly delivered medications would be stored in the medication carts. LVN 3 stated this cabinet is for the storage of discontinued or discharged…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-21 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — patternProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled resident's (Resident 37) lab test was completed timely. This deficient practice resulted in a delay of care that had the potential to result in a continued undiagnosed problem that may be harmful for Resident 37. Findings: During a review of Resident 37's admission Record, the admission record indicated Resident 37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including acute respiratory failure (when the air sacs of the lungs cannot release enough oxygen into the blood), type 2 diabetes (long-term condition in which the body has trouble controlling blood sugar and using it for energy), hypertension (condition in which the force of the blood against the artery walls is too high), and dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities). During a review of Resident 37's Minimum Data Set ([MDS] a resident assessment tool) dated 11/8/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 37's cognition (ability to think and reason) was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: a. Label food items properly. -One opened bottle of 'Thick and Easy' (thickener-a substance which can increase the viscosity of a liquid without substantially changing its other properties) -Two cups of chicken noodle soup -One bag of Seven Zucchinis -Two bunches of Celery -Four lettuces and the Five tomatoes in one container -One bag of cookie dough b. Remove expired items. -Diabetisource AC (a tube feeding formula) -Two bags of bread c. Test and document the concentration of the sanitizing solution and dish machine prior to use. These failures had the potential to result in contamination, or improper sanitation, compromising resident safety, infection control and food borne illness. Findings: a. During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/18/2025 at 8:12 a.m., with the Dietary Supervisor (DS), in the kitchen, the following items were found without proper labeling or date marking in the refrigerator and freezer: -One opened bottle of 'Thick and Easy' (thickener-a substance which can increase the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the licensed nursing staff failed to maintain and complete accurate medical records in accordance with accepted professional standards for one of three sampled residents (Resident 27) by failing to: 1.Ensure Resident 27's Dialysis (mechanical removal of waste from the body due to kidney failure) Communication Record DCR (a medical document about a patient's dialysis treatment) was completed. 2. Ensure Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 8, did not falsify Resident 27's Dialysis Communication Record for dates 1/23/2025, 1/28/2025, 2/4/2025 and 2/11/2025 when he (LVN 8) documented about Resident 8 even though he (LVN 8) was not working on those days. This deficient practice of falsifying Resident 27's Dialysis Communication Record indicated an inaccurate state of the resident's condition, and placed Resident 27 at risk of not receiving appropriate care due to inaccurate and incomplete resident medical care information. Findings: During a review of Resident 27's admission Record,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: a. Ensure Resident 7's, foley catheter ( a thin, flexible tube inserted into the bladder [an organ that stores urine] to drain urine) was not touching the floor. b.Ensure facility staff used the correct Personal Protective Equipment (PPE: equipment worn (gown, gloves, goggles) to help create a barrier between a healthcare worker and germs) when caring for one of two sampled residents (Resident 15) that was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP: infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs)) and not performing hand hygiene prior to entering room. c. Ensure the facility staff had access to PPE d. Conduct annual Legionella (a severe form of lung infection that causes lung inflammation caused by bacteria) facility risk assessment. These deficient practices had the potential to transmit infectious microorganisms and increase the risk of infections for the residents. During a review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-21 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to offer and monitor the immunization (a process whereby a person is made resistant to a disease through medication administration) status for the Influenza (flu: a contagious respiratory illness) and Pneumococcal (bacterial infection that causes serious lung infections) vaccinations (medication to prevent a particular disease) for one of five sampled residents (Resident 9). This deficient practice resulted in Resident 9's medical records being incomplete. Findings: During a review of Resident 9's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including gastrostomy (a surgical opening fitted with a device to allow feedings to be administered directly to the stomach common for people with swallowing problems), cerebral palsy (group of disorders that affect muscle tone and movement), and asthma (chronic lung disease that causes inflammation in the airway). During a review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-21 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolatedAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to involve one of three sampled resident's (Resident 26) in the resident's initial Interdisciplinary Team (IDT-team of health care professionals that work together toward and prioritize the resident 's needs) care conference. This deficient practice violated Resident 26's rights to be informed and the right to participate in resident's plan of care. Findings: During a review of Resident 26's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy (brain problem), type 2 diabetes (disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), and muscle weakness. During a review of Resident 26's Minimum Data Set (MDS), a resident assessment tool, dated 2/20/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 26's cognition was severely impaired. The MDS indicated Resident 26 was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living (ADLs- routine…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for one of two sampled residents (Resident 37) addressing Resident 37's anticoagulant (medications that prevent blood from clotting) use. This deficient practice had the potential to result in poor quality of care and a delay of care and services. Findings: During a review of Resident 37's admission Record, the admission record indicated Resident 37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including acute respiratory failure (when the air sacs of the lungs cannot release enough oxygen into the blood), and atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat). During a review of Resident 37's Minimum Data Set ([MDS] a resident assessment tool) dated 11/8/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 37's cognition (ability to think and reason) was moderately impaired. The MDS indicated Resident 37 was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living (ADLs- activities such as bathing, dressing and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-21 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled resident's (Resident 5) informed consent (voluntary agreement to accept treatment and/or procedures after receiving education regarding the risks, benefits, and alternatives offered) for psychotropics (drug or other substance that affects how the brain works and causes changes in mood, awareness, thoughts, feelings, or behavior) was obtained prior to administration. This deficient practice violated Resident 5's rights to receive all information, in advance, of risks and benefits of proposed care, treatment, treatment alterative, and choose the alterative of choice which includes information for administration of psychotropic drugs. Findings: During a review of Resident 5's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 5 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute kidney failure (A condition in which the kidneys suddenly can't filter waste from the blood), acute cystitis (infection of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide documented evidence of all employees screening, education, offering, and current Corona virus disease, COVID-19 (contagious infectious disease), vaccination (medications used to prevent diseases usually given by injection or by mouth) status. This failure had the potential to place staff and residents at risk for negative health outcomes such as being hospitalized due to COVID-19. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review of the Covid-19 Staff Vaccination Status (document that reflects staff employee vaccination status) on 2/19/2025 at 4:36 p.m., with the Infection Prevention Nurse (IPN), the IPN stated she does not know the facility physicians and consultants Covid-19 immunization status. During an interview on 2/20/2025 at 4:42 p.m., with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated the Covid-19 vaccination status for all employees including doctors, rehabilitation departments, and consultants that come in contact with residents must be known as they put the residents they are incontact with at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure to store food with open date (date food package was opened for use) label and food expiration date. This practice put the facility residents at risk for infection by ingesting expired foods and can result in foodborne illnesses and symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, stomach cramps, and diarrhea. The expired foods are at risk for decreased flavor and taste. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview with Kitchen Assistant (KA) 1, on 2/24/2024 at 6:58 a.m., of there was a seal plastic container with white powder thickener with a peeled label, on the kitchen counter. Surveyor was unable to observe any received-on, opened-on or expiration date. KA stated, there should be a label on the container. KA 1 stated, we need to know the date that container was opened. KA 1 stated, the kitchen staff need to know until when the product can be used. KA 1 stated, the label is very important, so residents do not eat any expired product. During a concurrent observation and interview with the Kitchen…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services that meet the needs three of 11 sampled residents (Resident 29, 32 and 202): 1. Resident 29 and Resident 32 did not receive medication at the scheduled time and with food as ordered by the physician. 2. Resident 202 received a crushed enteric coated medication. These deficient practices had the potential for avoidable physical harm related to residents not receiving their medications on time, or experiencing potential adverse drug reactions from medications being administered differently from how they were ordered. Findings: During a review of Resident 32's admission Record, dated 2/25/2024, the admission record indicated Resident 32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hypertension (when the pressure in your blood vessels is too high), schizoaffective disorder (a mental disorder with symptoms of hallucinations or delusions and mood disorder like depression), and depression (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-25 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to ensure they were free of medication error rate of five (5) percent (%) or greater as evidenced by the identification of three (3) medication errors out of 29 opportunities for errors, to yield a facility medication error rate of 12 % for three of 11 sampled residents (Residents 29, 32, and 202). 1. Resident 202 receive a crushed extended release (ER-designed to slowly release a drug in the body over an extended period of time especially to reduce dosing frequency) medication administration of metoprolol succinate (medication for high blood pressure) 2. During medication administration of metoprolol tartrate (medication to manage high blood pressure) for Resident 32 and metformin HCL (medication used to treat diabetes [abnormal sugar]) for Resident 29. Residents did not receive medication at the scheduled time and with food as ordered by the physician. These deficient practices had the potential to result in ineffectively managed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to follow their infection control policy for five out of 29 sampled residents (14, 32, 40, 153, and 202) by failing to: A: Properly put on personal protective equipment (PPE, equipment used to prevent or minimize exposure to hazards) upon entering Resident 153's contact isolation room. B. Ensure oxygen tubing (plastic tubing applied to the nostrils that delivers life sustaining gases) was not on the ground for Resident 14. c. Disinfect the blood pressure cuff (tool used to measure blood pressure) after each use for Residents 32, 40, and 202. Findings: A. During a review of Resident 153's admission Record dated 2/27/2024, the admission Record indicated Resident 153 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including urinary tract infection (UTI, an infection of the urinary system), extended spectrum beta lactamase (ESBL) resistance (bacterial infection resistant to a class of antibiotics), and multiple fractures (broken bones)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-25 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to protect the dignity of one out of 29 sampled residents (Resident 1) by not providing a dignity bag (conceals the urinary drainage bag [a bag that collects urine] from public view to maintain the residents' dignity) over the urinary catheter bag. This deficient practice had the potential to compromise Resident 1's privacy and dignity. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, dated 2/25/2024, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including sepsis (a life-threatening complication of an infection), obstructive and reflux uropathy (a condition when urine cannot drain through the urinary tract and backs up), and acute kidney failure (a condition in which the kidneys cannot filter waste from blood). During a review of Resident 1's History and Physical (H&P), dated 10/10/2023, the H&P indicated Resident 1 could make needs known but…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-25 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to assess the urine in the foley catheter tubing (a plastic device inserted inside the body to drain urine from the bladder [an organ that is part of the urinary system] into an outside bag) for sediments and cloudiness for one of two sampled residents (Resident 8). Resident 8 had an indwelling foley catheter with noticeable sediment (accumulation of white blood cells) and cloudiness in the urine tubing. This deficient practice placed Resident 8 at risk for a urinary tract infection ([UTI] when bacteria enter the urinary system and infect the urinary tract). Findings: During a review of Resident 8's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 8 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Benign prostatic hyperplasia (a noncancerous enlargement of the prostate gland [a part of the urinary system], retention of urine unspecified (inability to completely empty the bladder of urine), and disorder of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of two sampled residents (Resident 14 and Resident 103) received respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practice when: 1.Resident 14's oxygen (life sustaining gas in air) nasal cannula (a device used to deliver supplemental oxygen) tubing, and humidifier (liquid that moistens the air) bottle was not labeled with the date of change to be used as reference for changing humidifier bottles every seven days. These failures had the potential to result in unsafe use or storage of oxygen equipment, respiratory infection, and/or hospitalization for Resident 14 . 2.Resident 103's Bilevel positive airway pressure (BIPAP - a device that helps a patient breath) machine was not set up for Resident 103's use, as ordered by physician. This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 103 being unable to breathe comfortably, and/or hospitalization. Findings: During a review of Resident 14's admission Record,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 20 of 29 resident rooms (Rooms 1 to 7, 11 to 14, 19, 23-29) met the requirements of 80 square feet for each resident in multiple resident bedrooms. The 20 rooms consisted of two beds in each bedroom. This deficient practice had the potential to limit space to provide nursing care, and limit privacy for residents. Findings: During a review of the facility's Client Accommodations Analysis form, submitted 2/18/2025, the form indicated the following resident rooms measured: room [ROOM NUMBER] (2 beds) 155.76 total, 77.88 square footage per resident room [ROOM NUMBER] (2 beds) 153.4 total, 76.8 square footage per resident room [ROOM NUMBER] (2 beds) 146.72 total, 73.36 square footage per resident room [ROOM NUMBER] (2 beds) 148.7 total, 74.4 square footage per resident room [ROOM NUMBER] (2 beds) 158.12 total, 79.0 square footage per resident room [ROOM NUMBER] (2 beds) 138.32 total, 69.16 square footage per resident room [ROOM NUMBER]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-02-25 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 11 of 29 resident rooms (Rooms 2, 4, 5, 7, 11, 12, 13, 14, 20, 26, 27) met the requirements of 80 square feet for each resident in multiple resident bedrooms. The 11 rooms consisted of two beds in each bedroom. This deficient practice had the potential to limit space to provide nursing care, and limit privacy for residents. Findings: During a review of the facility's Client Accommodations Analysis form, the form indicated the following resident bedrooms measured: room [ROOM NUMBER] (2 beds) 153.4 total, 76.8 square footage per resident room [ROOM NUMBER] (2 beds) 148.7 total, 74.4 square footage per resident room [ROOM NUMBER] (2 beds) 158.12 total, 79.0 square footage per resident room [ROOM NUMBER] (2 beds) 150.3 total, 75.2 square footage per resident room [ROOM NUMBER] (2 beds) 150.3 total, 75.2 square footage per resident room [ROOM NUMBER] (2 beds) 143.2 total, 71.6 square footage per resident room [ROOM NUMBER] (2 beds)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to THE MANDELBAUM FAMILY — 18 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 3.2 | -1.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 3.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
The other 17 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BELLFLOWER INVESTMENT HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 50% | since 12/19/2019 |
| STOCK, MORDECHAI | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | 50% | since 06/30/2020 |
| SIMCHA AND JANET MANDELBAUM FAMILY TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 20% | since 01/01/2023 |
| THE BENTZION MANDELBAUM 2021 IRREVOCABLE GIFT TRUST NO. 2 | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 50% | since 11/22/2021 |
| THE JANET MANDELBAUM 2021 IRREVOCABLE GIFT TRUST NO 2 | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 16% | since 11/22/2021 |
| THE SIMCHA MANDELBAUM 2021 IRREVOCABLE GIFT TRUST NO. 2 | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 14% | since 11/22/2021 |
| MANDELBAUM, JANET | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 12/01/2021 |
| AGUILOS, ROBERT | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/15/2024 |
| ANSELMO, CLARENCE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/29/2022 |
| CASTRO-GARCIA, MARIA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/06/2019 |
| CORONELL, GINO | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/14/2024 |
| GUERRERO, VINCENTE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/02/2022 |
| KABBANY, VICTOR | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2022 |
| LOPEZ, LISA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/13/2023 |
| MANDELBAUM, SIMCHA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2026 |
| ORDEN, BANJIE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/05/2022 |
| PHAM, JULIE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/16/2000 |
| WILLIAMS, CLINTON | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/04/2010 |
| 9710 ARTESIA LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2023 |
| HANSEN | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2023 |
| SKILLSERVE INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/20/2007 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 34 rows in the source record cover these 21 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $371K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055408. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-16, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.