Ventura Post Acute

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

64.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 244 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 72.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 92 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.38 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 65% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 30% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 71 beds and averages 64.1 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.70 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.68 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.71 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.28 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.88 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.74 to 0.52 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 25% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · F2025-06-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the ice machine was properly and routinely sanitized according to facility policy and procedures (P&P) and manufacturer's service manual. This failure had the potential to result in the growth of harmful microorganisms which can cause foodborne illness to its vulnerable residents. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 6/9/25 at 10:40 a.m., with the Assistant Dietary Supervisor (ADS), ADS verbalized that the facility's Maintenance Supervisor (MS) was in charge of the ice machine maintenance. The facility form titled, Bi-Monthly Ice Machine Cleaning Log, dated 11/8/24 through 5/23/25, which was posted on the side of the ice machine, was reviewed. The log indicated, the ice machine was cleaned twice a month using a nickel-safe ice machine cleaner (a specially formulated food-grade product for removing scale deposits from ice makers having nickel-plated or tin-plated evaporators), rinsed with water, and the filters cleaned. There was no information mentioned in the log regarding sanitization…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure fingernail care was provided for 3 of 16 sampled residents (Residents 9, 43, and 45). This failure had the potential to negatively affect their self-esteem, comfort, and personal hygiene. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/10/2025 at 9:15 a.m. with Resident 9, the resident was observed with visibly long fingernails. Resident 9 stated she is unable to cut her fingernails, and her nails have not been cut for a few weeks. During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/11/25 at 9:10 a.m. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), CNA observed Resident 9's fingernails and stated they needed to be trimmed. During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/10/25 at 9:37 a.m. with Resident 43, the resident was observed with visibly long brown colored fingernails. Resident 43 stated her fingernails had not been cut for several weeks, and she would like them trimmed. During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/11/25 at 10:45 a.m. with Licensed Nurse 2 (LN 2), LN 2 checked…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-06-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one emergency drug supply kit (e-kit) was secured when not in use. This failure had the potential to allow unauthorized personnel access to emergency drug supply. Findings: During an observation on 6/10/25 at 9:48 a.m. in Medication room [ROOM NUMBER], one e-kit was found to be unsealed with a delivered by pharmacy date of 6/8/25. Upon further observation, this e-kit contained but not limited to, antibiotics and blood pressure medications. During an interview on 6/10/25 at 9:49 a.m. with License Nurse (LN 1), LN 1 stated the e-kit should be secured with a zip tie and confirmed when received by pharmacy, the receiving nurse needed to verify the e-kit is locked before acceptance. During an interview on 6/10/25 at 9:52 a.m. with Director of Nursing (DON), DON stated this was inspected a few days ago by the Nursing Supervisor and it should have been secured with a zip tie. DON stated, It's expected the receiving nurse to check every…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure care plan interventions were implemented for one of five sampled residents (Resident 6). This failure had the potential to result in Resident 6's needs not being met. Findings: During a review of Resident 6's admission Record (AR), dated 6/11/25, the AR indicated, Resident 6 was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to, Cerebral Infarction (a condition in which blood flow to part of the brain is blocked or reduced), and Aphasia (a language disorder affecting communication). During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/11/25 at 9 a.m. with Resident 6, the resident was observed in bed, awake and alert, making eye contact but not responding to questions. No communication board was present at the bedside. During an interview on 6/11/25 at 9:05 a.m. with a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), CNA stated she was not aware of communication tools such as picture aids and relied on gesture to communicate with Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure one of four sampled residents (Resident 14) received consistent professional care as a dialysis resident when the resident's dialysis access site was not assessed pre and post dialysis. In addition, licensed nurses documented in error. This failure had the potential for Resident 14 to have unassessed complications and resulted in an inaccurate medical record. Findings: During an observation on 6/9/25 at 8 a.m. in room [ROOM NUMBER], Resident 14 was preparing for dialysis. Resident 14 had a right chest catheter for dialysis access and a left lower arm AVF (Arteriovenous fistula - surgically made connection between an artery and a vein for dialysis). During a review of Resident 14's dialysis binder book (a binder containing records of pre and post dialysis forms documenting pre and post dialysis assessments) and eMAR (electronic Medical Record - an electronic medication administration record system that helps ensure medications and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-24 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed and appropriately implemented for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when: 1. Blood pressure (BP) parameters were not followed, as ordered, prior to Resident 1 receiving the medication Carvedilol (a medication used to lower BP). 2. The physician was not notified, as ordered, of Resident 1's elevated blood sugar levels on two occasions. These failures had the potential to result in the inappropriate delivery of care and services to the resident affecting health and safety. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), dated 3/24/25, the AR indicated, Resident 1 was an [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including, interstitial pulmonary disease (a group of diseases that irritate, inflame or scar the lungs and supporting air sacs), drug or chemical induced diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia (occurs as a side effect of certain medications that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-05 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the exterior metal framed sliding glass door across the hallway that led to outside of the facility opens and closes properly. The sliding glass door partially opens and could not be securely closed . This failure has the potential for cold air from outside to go thru the unclosed glass sliding door, placing residents at risk to have a cold environment /temperature inside the facility. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview inside Resident 2's room on 03/07/2024 at 10:44 a.m., the metal framed sliding glass door across the hallway from Resident 2's room that led to outside of the facility was noted to be part way opened. Resident 2 stated, It's not warm enough because they always leave it open, and the cold comes into my room, and when I complain to staff, they just tell me to shut my door. During further observation on 03/07/2024 at 10:54 a.m., in the back interior hallway across from Resident 2's room, a metal framed sliding glass door that led to outside the facility was not closed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-12-08 · tag F0557 — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents rights and dignity for one of 19 sampled residents (Resident 17) was upheld when staff did not document what personal belongings the resident have and did not informed the resident of it's whereabouts . This failure had the potential for the resident to not have access to his own belongings which can result to loss of rights and also may cause some mental anguish . Findings: During an interview on 12/05/23 at 10:17 A.M. with Resident 17, Resident 17 verbalized, I wanted to buy a cellphone so I can find out how much money I have. But I don't know where my money is. During an interview with a Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 1) on 12/0823 at 9:31 a.m., LVN1 stated, she saw Resident 17's personal belongings on the bedside table with lose cash and credit cards, and placed it all in a zip lock bag and kept the resident belongings in the medication cart lock box. LVN1 confirmed not checking the resident's belongings, nor creating a list /inventory . LVN1 stated , not letting the nurse supervisor and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-12-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure sanitary conditions in the facility kitchen area was maintained when the back wall of the dishwashing machine and the main drain basin floor were found with build up , uncleaned substance /rust , chipped and worned out tiles. This failure has the potential to harbor the growth of bacteria (microscopic living organisms that effect skin, lungs, brain, blood and other parts of your body) which can be spread to all . Findings: During an observation on 12/05/23 09:03 A.M. at the kitchen, the back wall of the dishwasher has a dark orange colored substance / rust build up. Rust like material was also observed on the drainpipe and its supporting structures. Cracks and chipped tiles surrounding the main open drain or basin was noted and so with grout between tiles have worn off. During an interview on 12/05/23 at 09:05 a.m., with Assistant Dietary Supervisor (ADS), the ADS indicated there was an assigned staff member to mop and clean the floor, clean the dishwasher top and under the counter , but it seems not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-12-08 · tag F0636 — isolated
  Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the the Minimum Data Set (MDS - a tool used to assess all residents in Medicare or Medicaid certified nursing homes) quarterly assessment was completed on time for 1 of 1 unsampled residents (Resident 18). This failure resulted in the non complaince of the assessment as set by the Centers of medicaid and medicare services (CMS). Findings: A review of Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) RAI Manual, Version 3.0, dated October 2023, the RAI indicated, Timeliness Criteria, Completion Timing: For a non-admission OBRA (Omnibus Budget Reconcillation Act - a law that protects peple from abuse in a nursing home) and PPS (Prospective Payment System a method of reimbursement for Medicare payment) assessment, the Minimum data Set (MDS - a tool used to assess all residents in Medicare or Medicaid certified nursing homes) Completion Date (Z0500B) must be no longer than 14 days after the Assessment Reference Date (ARD - last day for the observation period) (A2300). During a review of Resident 18's MDS Quartely…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE MANDELBAUM FAMILY — 18 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 32 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $774K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA