Grand Valley Health Care Center
13524 Sherman Way, Van Nuys, CA 91405 · For profit - Corporation · 99 certified beds · (818) 786-3470 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jan 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (71) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $78,830 in federal fines (most recent 2025-01-21)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 17.5% | 10.2% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.0% | 4.0% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 2.2% | 0.8% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.8% | 1.2% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 8.9% | 7.3% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.1% | 1.6% | 3.3% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 12.3% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 13.6% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 94.3% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 13.2% | 4.3% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 8.0% | 10.2% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 5.9% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.2% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 81.9% | 93.2% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 23.8% | 23.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 6.0% | 11.2% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 3.31 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.33 | 1.57 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
52.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 216 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 46.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 67 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.46 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 76% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 40% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 52.4%CMS range 46.4–58.8 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 16.1%CMS range 13.1–18.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 46.3% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 53.7% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 32.8% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 94.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 91.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.6% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.2%CMS range 3.6–9.1 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.16 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 88.7 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.54 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.60 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.63 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.97 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.77 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.70 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 37% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
71 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 60 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2026-01-02 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to:1. Ensure one of seven (7) sampled residents (Resident 56), who had an order for modified liquid consistency (liquids that have been thickened [drinks such as water, juice, coffee, modified with powders or gels to be easier and safer to swallow] to a specific level to improve swallowing safety per the International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative [IDDSI - framework that provides a common terminology to describe food textures and drink thickness]), was not provided thin (water-like) liquids. The facility failed to: a. Ensure that Resident 56, who has a diagnosis of dysphagia (swallowing difficulties) and was at risk for aspiration (when food, liquid or other material enter a resident's airway and eventually the lungs), and who was placed on a restorative dining program (a nursing intervention designed to help residents maintain or regain their highest level of independence and safety during mealtime) requiring supervision and/or assistance during meals, was not served unthickened coffee with a straw…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement and revise a comprehensive person-centered care plan (a document that summarizes a resident's needs, goals, and care/treatment) addressing residents' low air loss mattress (LALM - a specialty bed that alternates pressure to help heal and prevent pressure ulcer/injuries [PU/PI- injuries that breakdown the skin and underlying tissue when an area of skin is placed under pressure]) use for three of three sampled residents (Resident 1, Resident 2, and Resident 3). This deficient practice had the potential to negatively affect the delivery of care and services and miscommunication among the care team for residents with the LALM use.Findings: a. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated that the facility originally admitted the resident on 2/2/2024 and readmitted the resident on 4/30/2025 with diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus (disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the proper use of low air loss mattress (LALM - a specialty bed that alternates pressure to help heal and prevent pressure ulcers/injuries [PU/PI- injuries that break down the skin and underlying tissue when an area of skin is placed under pressure]) by: Failing to maintain the LALM in the appropriate operating mode while a resident was in bed for one of three sampled residents (Resident 2).Applying multiple layers of linens over the LALM for two of three sampled residents (Resident 2 and Resident 3), which could interfere with the LALM's pressure-redistribution function. These failures had the potential to compromise the effectiveness of the LALM, increasing the resident's risk of skin breakdown and/or delaying the healing of existing PU/PI.During a review of Resident 2's admission Record, the admission Record indicated that the facility admitted the resident (Resident 2) on 2/18/2025 with diagnoses that included left femur (thigh…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility's licensed nurses failed to accurately assess and complete fall risk evaluations for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1).These deficient practices had the potential to place the residents at increased risk for injury related to falls.During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated that the facility originally admitted Resident 1 on 3/18/2026 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included metabolic encephalopathy (ME - a disorder that affects brain function), dehydration (when the body uses or loses more fluid than it takes in), diabetes mellitus (DM - a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), anemia (a condition where the body does not have enough healthy red blood cells), dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body) and hemiparesis (paralysis or weakness on one side of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility's licensed nurses failed to accurately assess and complete dehydration (a condition that occurs when the body loses too much water and other fluids that it needs to work normally) risk assessments for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1).These deficient practices had the potential to place the residents at increased risk for dehydration.During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated that the facility originally admitted Resident 1 on 3/18/2026 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included metabolic encephalopathy (ME - a disorder that affects brain function), dehydration, diabetes mellitus (DM - a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), anemia (a condition where the body does not have enough healthy red blood cells), dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body) and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-02 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — patternKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the confidential personal information of residents were protected by failing to ensure documents (diet tickets) containing protected information ([PHI]- any health information that can be used to identify specific individual which must remain confidential to prevent harmful consequences) were shredded prior to disposing in the waste container. This failure had the potential to violate 80 of 82 residents' rights for privacy and confidentiality of personal and medical records. Findings: During an observation on 12/30/2025 at 3:36 p.m. of the dishwashing process with Dietary Aide 2 (DA 2), observed DA 2 sorting food and diet tickets from the soiled residents' tray in different trash containers. DA 2 threw the menu tickets in the trash. During an interview on 12/30/2025 at 3:43 p.m. with DA 2, DA 2 stated he separated food from diet tickets and napkins as they have a separate dumpster container. DA 2 stated the food goes to the food dumpster and the diet tickets and napkins go to trash dumpster. DA 2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-02 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that its medication error rate was less than five (5) percent (%). Three (3) medication errors out of 34 total opportunities contributed to an overall medication error rate of 8.82% affecting two of three residents (Resident 21 and 22) observed for medication administration. The medication errors were as follows: 1. For Resident 21: a. The facility failed to ensure that lidocaine 4% gel (a topical [applied to the skin] pain medication) was applied to Resident 21's left shoulder as ordered. b. The facility failed to ensure diclofenac sodium gel (a topical pain medication) was applied to the correct site when it was applied to Resident 21's left shoulder which was not a site indicated in the physician's order. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident 22's metformin (medication to treat high blood sugar) medication was administered on time and with a meal per physician (MD) order. These failures had the potential to result in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-02 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow the menu and meet the nutritional needs of the residents when [NAME] 1 did not follow the recipe for Puree 3 bean chili. This failure had the potential to result in decrease in food flavor, decrease in food and nutrient intake to 19 of 19 residents on Puree (foods that are smooth with pudding like consistency) /International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative ([IDDSI] a framework for categorizing food textures and drink thickness) Level 4, and puree consistent carbohydrate diet (diet consisting of the same amount of carbohydrates per meal for blood sugar management), resulting in increased blood sugar levels and unplanned weight loss. Findings: During a review of the facility's menu spreadsheet (a sheet containing the kind and amount of food each diet would receive) titled Winter Menus, dated 12/29/2025, the spreadsheet indicated residents on puree diet/IDDSI Level 4 would include the following foods on the tray: Puree three (3) bean chili 1 cup (c, a household measurement) Puree tossed green…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-02 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare food by methods that conserved appearance, flavor and temperature for lunch when: Puree (foods that are soft with pudding like consistency) chili was flat on the plate and puree tossed salad was too watery. Puree tossed green salad's temperature was at 61 degrees Fahrenheit ( F, a degree of temperature), puree Jello's temperature at 51 F, tossed green salad's temperature at 61 F, and citrus chiffon delight's temperature at 55 F during test tray (a process of tasting, temping, and evaluating the quality of food) These failures had potential to result in 80 of 82 facility residents at risk of unplanned weight loss, a consequence of poor food intake, from receiving getting food from the kitchen. Findings: During a review of the facility's menu spreadsheet (a sheet containing the kind and amount of food each diet would receive) titled Winter Menus, dated 12/29/2025, the spreadsheet indicated residents on puree diet/International…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-02 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — patternEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident 20 received and consumed food in appropriate nutritive content as prescribed by a physician. This deficient practice had the potential to result in ineffective therapeutic diet, decreased in nutrient intake to one (Resident 20) of 82 residents, resulting in weight loss, getting food from the kitchen. Findings: During a review of Resident 20's admission Record, the admission record indicated the facility initially admitted Resident 20 on 9/16/2022 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including, but not limited to, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition (body lacks protein and energy for basic functions leading to noticeable weight loss, fatigue and muscle loss), type 2 diabetes (too much sugar in the blood because the body cannot use insulin right away), and essential hypertension (high blood pressure). During a review of Resident 20's Minimum Data Sheet (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary food storage and food preparation practices in the kitchen when: 1, Kitchen equipment and utensils were not free from dirt, dust and food debris. a. Reach in refrigerators one (1), two (2), near the trayline (an area where foods were assembled from the steamtable to resident's plate) and four (4) had dirt, food, dust debris and buildup, juice spills on the shelves and gaskets. b. The toaster had breadcrumbs and burnt bread debris. c. The ice machine side bins had dirt buildup. 2. Milk in two (2) cups at 44 degrees Fahrenheit ( F, a degree of temperature) and 43 F in the Reach in refrigerator 2. 3. The gasket on Reach-in refrigerator 2 was torn. 4. The Reach in refrigerator by trayline had no internal thermometer. 5. The dry storage floor had dirt, food and dust debris. 6. Four (4) dented cans were not separated with non-dented cans. 7. Chopping boards were stored along with red and green buckets containing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 60 citations
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-02 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — patternDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to dispose garbage and refuse properly by failing to ensure: 1. Two (2) of 2 black dumpsters (a movable waste container designed to be brought and taken away by a special collection vehicle, or to a bin that a specially designed garbage truck lifts) were completely closed while not actively being used. 2. There were no soiled gloves, masks, and a bag of trash on the floor area and surroundings of the facility's dumpster. 3. The dumpster designated for food and organic waste was not leaking fluid on the ground. These failures had potential to attract birds, flies, insects, pests, and possibly spread infection to 82 of 82 facility residents. Findings: During an observation on 12/30/2025 at 4:15 p.m., of the dumpster area with the Dietary Supervisor (DS), observed two (2) black dumpsters that were not completely closed and there was a bag of trash, soiled gloves, plastic, mask, and paper on the floor and the surroundings of the dumpster. During an observation on 12/30/2025 at 4:16 p.m., of the dumpster designated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure: 1. An unopened box of expired lancets (tiny, sharp needles used to prick the skin to obtain a small blood sample for blood glucose [sugar] monitoring) found in one of one medication storage room was disposed of on the date of expiration This deficient practice had the potential to cause an infection if the expired lancets were used on a resident. 2. One of three sampled resident's (Resident 21) insulin pen (a device used to administer insulin [a hormone that removes excess sugar from the blood, can be produced by the body or given artificially via medication]) tip was not cleaned with an alcohol pad prior to attaching the needle. This failure had the potential to increase Resident 21's risk of developing an infection at the site of the injection. Findings: a. During a concurrent observation and interview on [DATE] at 4:15 p.m., with Registered Nurse 1 (RN 1), observed inside the medication storage room, one unopened box of expired…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-02 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions in the food services department when one dead cockroach (a type of insect) was observed in the residents' refrigerator in the staff break room. This failure had the potential to result in 80 of 82 residents, who received food from the kitchen, acquiring food borne illnesses (illness caused by consuming contaminated foods or beverages) by consuming potentially contaminated food. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/31/2025 at 11:28 a.m., with the Dietary Supervisor (DS), observed the residents' refrigerator in the staff break room. Observed there was a resident's food stored inside the refrigerator and one (1) dead cockroach inside the vegetable bin. The vegetable bin was difficult to remove because a bench chair and another refrigerator were blocking the refrigerator door from completely opening. The DS stated the brown insect looked like a dead cockroach. During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/31/2025 at 11:31 a.m., with the Housekeeping…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-02 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 5) knocked on a resident's door and requested permission before entering the room for one of two sampled resident (Resident 114) reviewed under the dignity care area. This deficient practice violated the resident`s rights to be treated with respect and dignity, which had the potential to affect the resident's sense of self-worth and self-esteem. Findings: During a review of Resident 114's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 12/17/2025 with diagnoses including muscle weakness and type 2 diabetes mellitus (a group of diseases that result in too much sugar in the blood). During a review of Resident 114's Minimum Data Set (MDS-a standardized assessment and care screening tool) dated 12/23/2025, the MDS indicated the resident`s cognitive (the mental action or process of acquiring knowledge and understanding through thought, experience, and sense) skills for daily decision making were intact. The MDS indicated that Resident 114…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan (a plan of care that summarizes a resident's health conditions, specific care and services facility staff need to provide a resident to promote healing and prevent a worsening of a condition, and current treatments) for one of three residents (Resident 11) reviewed under the accidents care area by failing to indicate in the care plan titled, Impaired Physical Mobility and Self-Care Deficit, dated 1/08/2025, the required level of assistance needed to safely transfer Resident 56 from the bed to the and from wheelchair back to the bed. This deficient practice had the potential to place Resident 11 at risk for injuries. Findings: During a review of Resident 11's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated that the facility initially admitted the resident on 6/21/2024 and readmitted the resident on 4/28/2025 with diagnoses including muscle weakness and presence of artificial knee joint. During a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-02 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its policy and procedure titled Residents Who Present with Communication Barriers, by failing to provide a communication device or board (a tool that includes pictures that help residents communicate their healthcare and every-day needs to facility staff) in their preferred language for one of two sampled residents (Resident 55) reviewed under the communication-sensory care area. This deficient practice had the potential to prevent the resident from communicating with the staff and receiving care in a timely manner. Findings: During a review of Resident 55's admission Record, the admission Record indicated that the facility admitted the resident on 7/18/2025, with diagnoses including muscle weakness and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). During a review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized assessment and care screening tool) dated 10/23/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 55`s preferred language is not English and needed an interpreter to communicate with a doctor or health care staff. The MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to draw a resident's hemoglobin (Hgb, is the iron-rich protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen) and hematocrit, (Hct, is the percentage of the total blood volume made up of red blood cells) as indicated in the physician's order for one (Resident 4) of five residents investigated for unnecessary medications. This had the potential for residents to suffer side effects from having low blood counts such as dizziness and syncope (fainting). Findings: During a review of Resident 4's admission Record (or Facesheet, the front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included anemia (a condition where the body does not have enough healthy red blood cells). During a review of Resident 4's Census (the document that indicates when a resident goes and returns from a general acute care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an environment free from potential accident hazards for one of three residents (Resident 21) observed during medication administration when Resident 21's medications were left unattended at the resident's bedside. This deficient practice had the potential to result in an unsafe medication administration to Resident 21. Findings: During a review of Resident 21's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility originally admitted the resident on 6/9/2022 and most recently readmitted the resident on 3/7/2025 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, urinary tract infection (UTI- an infection in the bladder/urinary tract), type 2 (chronic) diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), and unspecified dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities). During a review of Resident 21's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and care screening tool), dated 11/18/2025, the MDS indicated the resident had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-02 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents who were incontinent (lacks voluntary control over urination) of bladder (organ in the pelvis that stores urine) received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections (UTI, common infections that happen when bacteria infect the urinary tract) by failing to ensure the urinary catheter (a thin flexible tube that is inserted into the bladder to help drain urine) collection bag tubing was not looped or coiled to allow the urine to flow freely into the collection bag for one of two residents (Resident 79) reviewed under the urinary catheter care area. This failure had the potential to result in the backflow of urine into the resident's bladders, which can cause urinary tract infections (UTI- an infection in the bladder/urinary tract). Findings: During a review of Resident 79's admission record, the admission record indicated, the facility initially admitted Resident 79 to the facility on 1/2/2023 and readmitted the resident on 11/28/2025 with diagnoses including…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-02 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the hemodialysis (a treatment to cleanse the blood of wastes and extra fluids artificially through a machine when the kidney(s) have failed) center completed a pre and post-dialysis assessment (evaluation done after hemodialysis by the hemodialysis licensed nurses) by not ensuring the dialysis center recorded a resident's pre and post dialysis weights (the weight before and after fluid is removed during the dialysis treatment) on multiple days from 9/4/2025 to 12/18/2025 for one (Resident 34) of two residents in the facility who received dialysis treatments. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 34 to have unidentified complications after dialysis treatment such as abnormal vital signs (pulse rate, temperature, respiration rate, and blood pressure). Findings: During a review of Resident 34's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the document indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-02 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its antibiotic stewardship (actions designed to use antibiotic [medications that fight bacterial infections] medications effectively while reducing the possibility of being prescribed an unnecessary medication) program by failing to conduct and complete an infection surveillance form before antibiotics were initiated for one of two sampled residents (Resident 15). This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 15 to develop antibiotic resistance (not effective to treat infection) from unnecessary or inappropriate antibiotic use for future infections.Findings: During a review of Resident 15's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility originally admitted the resident on 12/4/2025 with diagnoses including sepsis (a life-threatening condition that arises when the body's response to infection causes injury to its own tissues and organs) and urinary tract infection (UTI- infection in the urinary system). During a review of Resident 15's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) was treated with dignity and respect by not honoring Resident 1's request that Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1, whom Resident 1 reported as being rough during care, not provide care to Resident 1 upon readmission to the facility.During a review of Resident 1's admission record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 7/8/2025 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including fracture of the left femur (break of the long bone in the leg), osteoporosis (weak and brittle bones due to lack of calcium and vitamin D), rheumatoid arthritis (a chronic progressive disease-causing inflammation in the joints and resulting in painful deformity and immobility), morbid obesity (severely overweight), and generalized anxiety disorder (a mental health condition characterized by excessive, uncontrollable worry about everyday events).During a review of Resident 1's History and Physical (H&P)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-08 · tag F0628 — patternProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' Notice of Proposed Transfer and Discharge were provided to the resident and/or resident representative at least 30 days prior to discharge or as soon as practicable for three of three sampled residents (Resident 1, Resident 2, and Resident 3).This deficient practice placed the residents at increased risk of an inappropriate discharge and denied the residents the right to file an appeal to the appropriate agency within 10 days of being notified of a proposed transfer and discharge.a. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 6/13/2025 with diagnosis including chronic venous hypertension with ulcer (long-lasting skin sore on the leg, caused by poor blood flow in the veins) of left lower extremity and methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus infection (a bacterial infection caused by a type of bacteria that has become resistant to many of the antibiotics used…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-08 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) was actively involved in their discharge planning and had a safe discharge to a lower level of care.This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1 having to be admitted to the general acute care hospital (GACH) within 24 hours of discharge to a lower level of care and had the potential for decreased quality of care, decreased quality of life, and continuity of care.During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 6/13/2025 with diagnosis including chronic venous hypertension with ulcer (long-lasting skin sore on the leg, caused by poor blood flow in the veins) of left lower extremity and methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus infection (a bacterial infection caused by a type of bacteria that has become resistant to many of the antibiotics used to treat ordinary infections).During a review of Resident 1's History & Physical (H&P)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-01 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's low air loss mattress (a specialized mattress that alternates pressure to prevent skin breakdown) was in the correct setting for one (Resident 1) of three sampled residents.This deficient practice had the potential to place the resident at increased risk for discomfort and development of pressure ulcers (localized, pressure-related damage to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence).Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the most recent admission on [DATE] with diagnoses including urinary tract infection (UTI-an infection in the blader/urinary tract), type 2 diabetes (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), morbid obesity (severely over weight), cerebral infarction (a condition where part of the brain dies due to lack of blood supply), and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-16 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 2) received care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice by failing to administer Resident 2's Norco (a medication used to relieve severe pain) as prescribed by the physician. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 2 to experience untreated pain.Findings: During a review of Resident 2's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility originally admitted Resident 2 on 6/2/2022 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included metabolic encephalopathy (a brain disorder caused by a chemical imbalance in the body due to an underlying illness or organ dysfunction), sepsis (a serious condition in which the body responds improperly to an infection), paraplegia (loss of movement and/or sensation, to some degree, of the legs), and chronic pain syndrome (a condition where pain persists for more than three to six months, beyond the expected healing time for an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure clinical records for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) were maintained in accordance with accepted professional standards by failing to accurately document the administration of Resident 1's Oxycodone Hydrocholoride (a medication used to treat moderate to severe pain) on the Medication Administration Record (MAR- a report that serves as a legal record of the medications administered to a resident). This deficient practice placed Resident 1 at risk for medication errors, delayed pain relief and the potential for diversion (refers to redirection of prescription drugs from their intended use or disposal to unauthorized purposes) of a narcotic (a substance that dulled the senses and relieved pain) medication. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included fracture (broken bone) of lower end of right femur (thigh bone),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-20 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided necessary assistance with activities of daily living, specifically with mobility and getting out of bed for two of two sampled residents (Resident 3 and Resident 4). This deficient practice resulted in residents remaining in bed for prolonged periods and potentially compromise residents ' dignity, preferences and functional well-being. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 3 ' s admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility originally admitted Resident 3 on 3/17/2025 and readmitted Resident 3 on 3/30/2025 with diagnoses that included traumatic subdural hemorrhage (bleeding in the area between the brain and the skull usually caused by a head injury) without loss of consciousness (state of being awake and aware of one ' s surroundings), pneumonia (lung infection) and epilepsy (a neurological disorder characterized by recurring seizure [a sudden burst of electrical activity in the brain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide oral care for one of three sampled residents (Resident 3). This deficient practice resulted in Resident 3 not being provided with oral care on 5/16/2025 which could lead to potential negative outcomes such as development of oral health issues (discomfort and pain) including tooth decay or gum disease. Findings: During a review of Resident 3 ' s admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility originally admitted Resident 3 on 3/17/2025 and readmitted Resident 3 on 3/30/2025 with diagnoses that included traumatic subdural hemorrhage (bleeding in the area between the brain and the skull usually caused by a head injury) without loss of consciousness (state of being awake and aware of one ' s surroundings), pneumonia (lung infection) and epilepsy (a neurological disorder characterized by recurring seizure [a sudden burst of electrical activity in the brain causing changes in behavior, movement, feelings and level of consciousness]). During a review of Resident 3 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS- a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-20 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement an effective bowel (tube-shaped organ in the abdomen that completes the process of digestion) and bladder (a hollow organ that stores urine) retraining program (B&B retraining program - aim to establish or regain control over bowel and bladder function) for two of three sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 3) by not ensuring that the resident ' s bowel and bladder assessment was re-assessed in a timely manner. This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 1 and Resident 3 not being accurately assessed as candidates for a B&B retraining program and may have limited their (Resident 1 and Resident 3) opportunity to regain bowel and bladder function. Findings a. During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 2/27/2025 with diagnoses that included osteoporosis (a bone disease that develops when the quality and structure of the bone changes) with current…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to inform and provide information for two of two sampled residents (Resident 2 and 3) in advance regarding deep cleaning of their rooms. This deficient practice had the potential to affect the residents' sense of self-worth, self-esteem, and the resident's right. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 2's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 2 on 1/29/2025 with diagnoses including right knee and right ankle fractures (broken bones) and hypothyroidism (condition in which the thyroid gland doesn't produce enough thyroid hormone). During a review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool) dated 2/4/2025, the MDS indicated the resident's cognitive (the mental action or process of acquiring knowledge and understanding through thought, experience, and the senses) skills for daily decision making was intact, and the resident needed moderate assistance from staff with toileting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse (deliberately aggressive or violent behavior with the intention to cause harm) for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) when on 1/8/2025, Resident 2 punched Resident 1 in the face several times with a fist (a person's hand when the fingers are bent in toward the palm and held there tightly). This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1 being subjected to physical abuse by Resident 2 while under the care of the facility. Resident 1 sustained a left periorbital (around the eye) discoloration (change in the color, texture or pigmentation of the skin), abrasion (when the surface layers of the skin have been broken) on the left eyebrow, skin tear (a wound that happens when the layers of skin separate or peel back) on the left forearm (part of the arm between the elbow and the wrist) and skin tear on left dorsal (back portion) hand that needed first aid (initial assistance and care given to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for one of four sampled resident (Resident 2) by failing to follow-up with the physician to obtain an order to continue monitoring Resident 2's surgical wound with non-removable dressing. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 2 to have a wound infection. Findings: During a review of Resident 2 ' s admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 11/22/2024 with diagnoses including left hip fracture (broken bone) subsequent (following) encounter for orthopedic (relating to the orthopedics, the medical specialty that treats the bones, muscles, joints, and nerves) aftercare and dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities). During a review of Resident 2 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool) dated 11/28/2024, the MDS indicated the resident ' s cognitive (the mental action or process of acquiring knowledge and understanding…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure administration of a physician ordered eye drop was accurately documented in the Medication Administration Record (MAR- a daily documentation record used by a licensed nurse to document medications given to a resident) for one of four sampled residents (Resident 3). This deficient practice had the potential to result in confusion in the delivery of care and placed the resident at risk for not receiving the medication as ordered by the physician. Findings: During a review of Resident 3 ' s admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 10/29/2024 with diagnoses that included glaucoma (eye diseases that can cause vision loss and blindness by damaging a nerve in the back of eyes). During a review of Resident 3 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool) dated 11/4/2024, the MDS indicated the resident ' s cognitive (the mental action or process of acquiring knowledge and understanding through…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement infection control practices by failing to: 1. Ensure Licensed Vocational Nurse 2 (LVN 2) perform hand hygiene (HH – the practice of cleaning hands to prevent the spread of germs and infections) after checking a resident ' s blood pressure with bare hands for one of four sampled residents (Resident 3). 2. Ensure Treatment Nurse 1 (TN 1) perform hand hygiene between glove changes while providing wound treatment to one of four sampled residents (Resident 4). These deficient practices had the potential to result in the spread of germs placing residents, staff, and visitors at risk for infection. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 3 ' s admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 10/29/2024 with diagnoses including glaucoma (eye diseases that can cause vision loss and blindness by damaging a nerve in the back of your eye). During a review of Resident 3 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS - a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' low air loss mattresses (LALM, a mattress designed to distribute the resident's body weight over a broad surface area and help prevent skin breakdown) were set at the correct setting for three of 23 sampled residents (Residents 88, 11, and 196). This deficient practice had the potential to place the resident at risk for discomfort and development of pressure ulcers/injuries (an injury that breaks down the skin and underlying tissue when an area of skin is placed under pressure). Findings: a. During a review of Resident 88's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 88 on 2/28/2023 and readmitted the resident on 10/2/2024 with diagnoses including fracture (broken bone) of the left femur (the thigh bone), fracture of the left pubic bone (a broken bone in the front part of left hip), fracture of the left ulna (a broken bone in the left forearm), and diabetes type two (2) (a chronic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure leftover food brought from outside by resident's family and visitors were labeled with a resident identifier and use-by date for three of four residents (Resident 76, 83, and 192). This deficient practice had the potential to result in foodborne illness (also called food poisoning, illness caused by eating contaminated food) for the residents. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 76's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 7/30/2024 with diagnoses that included hypertension (high blood pressure [the force of the blood pushing on the blood vessel walls is too high]) and morbid obesity (is when you weigh more than 80 to100 pounds above your ideal body weight). During a review of Resident 76's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool), dated 8/05/2024, the MDS indicated the resident's cognitive (the mental action or process of acquiring knowledge and understanding through…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. During a review of Resident 30's admission Record, the admission Record indicated that the facility initially admitted Resident 30 on 2/22/2024 and readmitted the resident on 8/30/2024 with diagnoses including acute embolism and thrombosis of deep veins of the right lower extremity (a clinical condition in which blood clots [a gel-like clump of blood] are forming and affecting the veins and arteries in the right lower extremity), degenerative disease of nervous system (a condition where the nerves or brain gradually break down or stop working properly over time), and repeated falls. During a review of Resident 30's H&P, dated 2/23/2024, the H&P indicated that the resident did not have the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 30's MDS dated [DATE], the MDS indicated that the resident had severely impaired cognition. The MDS further indicated that Resident 30 was dependent on the assistance of two or more helpers for showering, required maximal assistance for toileting and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide reasonable services and accommodations for two of three sampled residents (Resident 16 and Resident 28) by failing to: 1. Ensure Resident 16's call light (a device used by a resident to signal his/her need for assistance from staff) was within reach while in bed. 2. Ensure Resident 28 was provided a call light that was adaptive to the resident's needs. These deficient practices had the potential to delay the provision of services and residents' needs not being met. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 16's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 5/20/2024, with diagnoses including, but not limited to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - a chronic lung disease that makes it difficult to breathe), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) following cerebral infarction (a type of stroke that occurs when blood flow to the brain is blocked) and hypertension (high blood pressure [the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that an advance directive (AD-written statement of a person's wishes regarding medical treatment made to ensure those wishes are carried out should the person be unable to communicate them to a doctor) was discussed and written information was provided to the resident and/or responsible parties for one of two sampled resident (Resident 6). This deficient practice violated the resident's and/or the representative's right to be fully informed of the option to formulate an advanced directive and had the potential to cause conflict with health care wishes. Findings: During a review of Resident 6's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 9/11/2024 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a group of lung diseases that make it difficult to breathe) and muscle weakness. During a review of Resident 6's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident assessment tool) dated 9/17/2024, the MDS indicated the resident had the ability to make self-understood and the ability…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe and comfortable temperature level for one of four sampled residents (Resident 30). This deficient practice had the potential to result in loss of body heat and risk of hypothermia (dangerously low body temperature) for Resident 30. Findings: During a review of Resident 30's admission Record, the admission Record indicated that the facility initially admitted Resident 30 on 2/22/2024 and readmitted the resident on 8/30/2024 with diagnoses including acute embolism and thrombosis of deep veins of the right lower extremity (a clinical condition in which blood clots [a gel-like clump of blood] are forming and affecting the veins and arteries in the right lower extremity), degenerative disease of nervous system (a condition where the nerves or brain gradually break down or stop working properly over time), and repeated falls. During a review of Resident 30's History and Physical (H&P- a formal assessment by a healthcare provider that involves a resident interview, physical exam, and documentation of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a person-centered care plan (a written document that summarizes a resident's needs, goals, and care/treatment) for two of three sampled residents (Resident 28 and 50) by failing to: 1. Develop a care plan addressing Resident 28's range of motion (ROM - the amount of movement that a particular joint or series of joints can achieve in a specific direction) limitations. 2. Develop a care plan addressing Resident 50's bowel and bladder incontinence (a problem holding in urine or stool). These deficient practices had the potential to result in failure to deliver the necessary care and services. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 28's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility re-admitted the resident on 7/26/2024, with diagnoses including, but not limited to osteomyelitis (a serious bone infection that causes inflammation and swelling in the bone) of vertebra (bones in the spine), type two (2) diabetes mellitus…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY b. During a review of Resident 30's admission Record, the admission Record indicated that the facility initially admitted Resident 30 on 2/22/2024 and readmitted the resident on 8/30/2024 with diagnoses including acute embolism and thrombosis of the deep veins of the right lower extremity (a clinical conditions in which blood clots [a clump of blood that has changed from liquid to gel-like state, which can block blood flow] is forming and affecting the veins and arteries in the right lower extremity), degenerative disease of the nervous system (a condition where the nerves or brain gradually break down or stop working properly over time), and repeated falls. During a review of Resident 30's History and Physical, (H&P) dated 2/23/2024, the H&P indicated that the resident did not have the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 30's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool), dated 10/17/2024, the MDS indicated that the resident had severely impaired cognition (a severely…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to comprehensively assess the limited mobility and range of motion (ROM - the amount of movement that a particular joint or series of joints can achieve in a specific direction) for one of two residents (Resident 28) when the resident was readmitted on [DATE]. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 28 not having the appropriate equipment to maintain their maximum practicable independence and had the potential to cause further decline in functional mobility, ROM, and quality of life. Findings: During a review of Resident 28's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility re-admitted the resident on 7/26/2024, with diagnoses including, but not limited to osteomyelitis (a serious bone infection that causes inflammation and swelling in the bone) of vertebra (bones in the spine), type two (2) diabetes mellitus (when sugar level is too high in the blood) with diabetic neuropathy (a nerve problem that causes pain, numbness, tingling,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure a fall risk evaluation was completed after a fall on 8/29/2024 and ensure the fall risk evaluation completed on 9/6/2024 was accurate for one of four sampled resident (Resident 30). This deficient practice had the potential to negatively affect Resident 30's plan of care and the delivery of necessary care and services. 2. Ensure Licensed Vocational Nurse 5 (LVN 5), who was administering medications to a resident, did not leave the prepared medications unattended at the resident's bedside for one of 23 sampled residents (Resident 197). This deficient practice had the potential to result in unauthorized personnel or residents having access to the resident's medications. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 30's admission Record, the admission Record indicated that the facility initially admitted Resident 30 on 2/22/2024 and readmitted the resident on 8/30/2024 with diagnoses including acute embolism and thrombosis of deep…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review Licensed Vocation Nurse 1 (LVN 1) failed to ensure that residents who needed respiratory care (the health care discipline that specializes in the promotion of optimum cardiopulmonary function and health and wellness) were provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice to one out of three sampled residents (Residents 242) by failing to: 1. Ensure that the suction catheter (a flexible hallow tube used to remove secretions from a patient's airway) was covered with a sleeve when not in use. 2. Administer oxygen (a colorless, odorless, and tasteless gas, that support life) to Resident 242 according to the physician order. 3. Label Resident 242's suction tubing with the date for when it was last changed. These deficient practices had the potential to cause respiratory infection to Resident 242. Findings: During a review of Resident 242's admission Record, the admission Record indicated that the facility initially admitted Resident 242 on 10/4/2024 and readmitted the resident on 10/11/2024 with diagnoses including malignant…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to administer pain medication as prescribed by the physician for one of sampled resident (Resident 6). This deficient practice had the potential to result in adverse consequences (undesired harmful effect resulting from a medication or other intervention). Findings: During a review of Resident 6's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 9/11/2024 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a group of lung diseases that make it difficult to breathe) and muscle weakness. During a review of Resident 6's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident assessment tool) dated 9/17/2024, the MDS indicated the resident had the ability to make self-understood and the ability to understand others. During a review of Resident 6's physician's orders, the physician's orders indicated an order for hydrocodone-acetaminophen (Norco- brand name; used to relieve moderate to severe pain) oral tablet 10-325 milligram (mg- unit of measurement) one tablet by mouth every four (4) hours as needed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a post-dialysis (the removing of waste and excess fluid to prevent build up in the body for residents who have loss of kidney [organs that remove waste products from the blood and produce urine] function) assessment for one of one sampled resident (Resident 13). This deficient practice placed Resident 13 at risk for complications of dialysis such as redness at the dialysis access site (way to reach the blood for hemodialysis), edema (too much fluid trapped in the body's tissues), excessive bleeding, and a change in vital signs (clinical measurements that indicate the state of a patient's essential body functions). Findings: During a review of Resident 13's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 7/18/2024 with diagnoses including, but not limited to end stage renal disease (when the kidneys can no longer filter blood properly), dependence on renal (kidney) dialysis. A review of Resident 13's History and Physical (H&P- a formal assessment by a healthcare provider that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-21 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its policy and procedure for an allegation of financial abuse for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) by failing to: 1. conduct a thorough investigation of the alleged financial abuse. 2. provide documented evidence that a Situation, Background, Assessment and Recommendation (SBAR - a communication tool that helps provide essential, concise information about the condition of a resident) Form was completed. 3. ensure Resident 1 was monitored every shift for 72 hours for emotional distress or negative outcome as a result of the alleged financial abuse. These deficient practices had the potential to place Resident 1 at risk for further abuse and could have resulted in Resident 1 needing care or emotional support which was not provided. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hydrocephalus (a condition where too…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement policies and procedures for ensuring the reporting of a reasonable suspicion of a crime in accordance with Section 1150B of the Act by failing to ensure the results of the abuse investigation for the allegation of financial abuse that occurred on 10/3/2024 was reported to the State Survey Agency (SSA) within five (5) working days for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident 1). This deficient practice had the potential to place Resident 1 at risk for further abuse. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hydrocephalus (a condition where too much cerebrospinal fluid [CSF- a clear, colorless, watery fluid that flows in and around your brain and spinal cord to help cushion the brain and spinal cord from injury and provide nutrients] builds up in the brain), and Alzheimer's Disease (a brain disorder that slowly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan (a written course of action that helps a resident achieve outcomes that improve their quality of life) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), who was involved in an allegation of financial abuse. This deficient practice had the potential to negatively affect the delivery of care and services to Resident 1. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hydrocephalus (a condition where too much cerebrospinal fluid [CSF- a clear, colorless, watery fluid that flows in and around your brain and spinal cord to help cushion the brain and spinal cord from injury and provide nutrients] builds up in the brain), and Alzheimer's Disease (a brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills and, eventually, the ability to carry out the simplest tasks). Resident 1's admission…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from verbal abuse (harsh and insulting language directed at a person) by Certified Nursing Assistant 1 (CNA 1) towards one of five sampled residents (Resident 1). On 9/7/2024, CNA 1 hurled (to utter) an obscene word (a curse word that is a socially offensive use of language) at Resident 1. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1 being subjected to verbal abuse while under the care of the facility and had the potential to cause emotional harm which could result to a feeling of low self-esteem and self-worth. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated that the facility admitted the resident on 7/20/2024 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, osteomyelitis (bone infection) of the ankle and foot and type two diabetes mellitus (a condition that happens because of a problem in the way the body regulates and uses sugar as a fuel) with foot ulcer (an open wound or sore that can be difficult to heal). During a review of Resident 1's History and Physical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ddisputed · IIDR2024-07-25 · tag F0711 — isolatedEnsure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the primary care physician (Primary Medical Doctor 1 [PMD 1]) for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1), who had a history of hypothyroidism (a condition where the thyroid gland doesn't release enough thyroid hormone [plays a role in regulating weight, energy levels, growth and metabolism] into the bloodstream), reviewed Resident 1's General Acute Care Hospital 1 (GACH 1) progress notes, including medications essential to Resident 1's medical treatment. PMD 1 failed to prescribed Resident 1 her (Resident 1) routine medication (medication taken regularly) of Levothyroxine (a medication used to treat an underactive thyroid gland [a gland that makes and stores hormones that help regulate the heart rate, blood pressure, body temperature, growth development and energy) upon admission to the facility on 5/26/2024. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1 not receiving 30 doses of Levothyroxine from 5/26/2024 to 6/25/2024. Subsequently,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of four sampled resident ' s (Resident 2) urinary drainage bag (bag that collects a resident ' s urine) was not placed above the resident ' s bladder (organ inside the body that stores urine). This deficient practice had the potential to result in urine flowing back into the resident ' s bladder which would then increase the risk for a urinary tract infection (an infection in any part of the urinary system) that can cause serious health problems such as sepsis (a serious condition in which the body responds improperly to an infection and a potentially life-threatening complication). Findings: A review of Resident 2 ' s admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 1/28/2024 with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease (CKD - a condition in which the kidneys are damaged and cannot filter blood as well as they should), and dementia (a general term for loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities that are severe enough to interfere with daily life). A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-03 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — patternProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the hemodialysis (also known as dialysis, the process of removing waste products and excess fluid from the body because the kidneys no longer function) center documented the pre (before) and post (after) dialysis weight of one of two sampled resident (Resident 279). This deficient practice placed the resident at risk for potential unidentified complications after dialysis treatment. Findings: A review of Resident 279' s Face Sheet (admission Record) indicated the facility admitted the resident on 9/25/2023 with diagnoses that included end stage renal disease (a medical condition in which a person's kidneys cease functioning on a permanent basis leading to the need for a regular course of long-term dialysis) and dependence on renal (kidney) dialysis. A review of Resident 279's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized assessment and care screening tool), dated 10/09/2023, indicated Resident 279 was cognitively (the process of acquiring knowledge and understanding through thought, experience, and the senses) intact with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-03 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure: 1. Licensed nurses signed one of three sampled resident's (Resident 14) Medication Administration Record (MAR- a report detailing the medications administered to a resident by a healthcare professional) after administering Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen (Norco- a medication used to treat pain) to the resident on six separate occasions. 2. Licensed nurses signed one of three sampled resident's (Resident 34) MAR after administering Norco to the resident on 10/4/2023. 3. Licensed nurses signed one of three sampled resident's (Resident 24) MAR after administering Acetaminophen-Codeine Number 3 (Tylenol #3 - a medication used to treat pain) to the resident on 10/22/2023 and 10/29/2023. 4. Physician`s order to check for blood sugar and to administer Insulin Lispro (a medication used to control high blood sugar) are implemented on 10/24/2023 for one of one resident (Resident 40) investigated under quality of care. 5. Licensed nurses immediately signed one…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-03 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure: 1. Licensed nurses monitored the behavior of angry outburst for a resident on Olanzapine (a medication used to treat schizophrenia [a serious mental condition of a type involving a breakdown in the relation between thought, emotion, and behavior] and bipolar disorder [a mental illness that causes unusual shifts in a person's mood, energy, activity levels, and concentration]) for one of five sampled residents (Resident 74) investigated for unnecessary medications. 2. Licensed nurses were monitoring specific behaviors of one of two sampled residents (Resident 54) for the use of Abilify (a medication used to treat schizophrenia and bipolar disorder by regulating mood, behavior, and thoughts), Lithium Carbonate (a mood stabilizing medicine used to treat bipolar disorder), Depakote (used to treat bipolar disorder). This deficient practice had the potential to result in adverse reaction or impairment in the resident's mental or physical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow proper sanitation and food handling practices by: 1. Failing to ensure a red sanitation bucket (contains sanitizing solutions with a recommended concentration of a chemical sanitizer, usually quaternary [Quat, potent chemical disinfectant] ammonium [an ingredient in many household cleaning products] compounds or chlorine [a type of sanitizing solution]), located in the dish washing area of the kitchen, for the quaternary solution registered at the required 200 parts per million (ppm- unit of measure, 200 ppm indicates the sanitizing solution is effective) as per facility policy. 2. Failing to ensure kitchen staff completely submerged (to cover and overflow with water) frozen food items in a deep pot and failed to ensure the food in the deep pot was under running water with a temperature of 70 degrees Fahrenheit (° F- unit of measure) while thawing (frozen food becoming liquid or soft because of warming) the frozen food. These deficient practices had the potential to place 78 of 91 residents living in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-03 · tag F0849 — patternArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed implement the facility's hospice (care designed to give supportive care to a resident in the final phase of a terminal illness [illness that cannot be cured] and focus on comfort and quality of life) policy and procedure for one of one sample residents (Resident 133) by failing to ensure Resident 133's hospice binder (the binder that contains the hospice services calendar, plan of care including interventions, nursing notes for a resident who is on hospice services) was in the facility to ensure communication between the hospice and the facility, and to ensure continuity of care for the hospice resident. This deficient practice had the potential to delay coordination and delivery of hospice services. Findings: A review of Resident 133's Face Sheet (admission Record) indicated the facility admitted the resident on 10/12/2023, with diagnoses that included malignant neoplasm of the brain (brain cancer). A review of Resident 133's Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment and care screening tool), dated 10/18/2023, indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-03 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its antibiotic stewardship(the effort to measure and improve how antibiotics [a medication used to treat or prevent infections] are prescribed and used by residents) program by failing to conduct infection surveillance (a tool to monitor the health of the residents) and complete the infection control reporting form once signs and symptoms of infection were identified and antibiotics were initiated for four (Resident 9, Resident 74, Resident 130, and Resident 132) of five sampled residents. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 9, Resident 74, Resident 130 and Resident 132 to develop antibiotic resistance (when germs like bacteria change over time and no longer respond to medicines) from unnecessary or inappropriate antibiotic use for future infections. Findings: a. A review of Resident 9's Face Sheet (admission Record) indicated the facility admitted the resident on 12/16/2022 and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-03 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to promote the resident's right to be informed of by the physician of the risks and benefits of the proposed plan for the administration of a psychotropic medication (medication that affects brain activities to control behavior or treat disordered thought processes) Olanzapine (a medication used to treat schizophrenia [a serious mental condition of a type involving a breakdown in the relation between thought, emotion, and behavior] and bipolar disorder [a mental illness that causes unusual shifts in a person's mood, energy, activity levels, and concentration]) for one of two sampled residents (Resident 62). This deficient practice had the potential for the resident and / or the resident 's representative (RR) not to be well-informed of the medications and the potential risks and side effects (undesirable effect of a medication or treatment). This also had the potential to place the resident and the RR to miss the opportunity to decide whether to proceed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-03 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the low air loss mattress (LAL- mattress designed to prevent and treat pressure wounds [injury to skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin]) was on the needed setting per manufacturer's guidelines for one of two sampled residents (Resident 34). This failure had the potential to place Resident 34 at risk for developing or worsening pressure wounds. Findings: A review of Resident 34's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 9/16/2023 with diagnosis that included sepsis (a serious condition in which the body responds improperly to an infection), urinary tract infection (infection in any part of the urinary system), and pneumonia (infection that affects one or both lungs). A review of Resident 34's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a standardized assessment and screening tool) dated 9/23/2023, indicated Resident 34's cognition (a mental process of acquiring knowledge and understanding) was intact. A review of Resident 34's Physician's Order dated 9/18/2023…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-03 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's physician's orders were followed by failing to flush a resident's gastrostomy tube (G-Tube - a tube inserted through the abdomen that brings nutrition and medications directly to the stomach) with water in between each medication administration for one of two sampled residents (Resident 41) observed during the medication administration task. This failure had the potential for drug interaction with unknown side effects and for the G-tube to become clogged. Findings: A review of Resident 41's Face Sheet (admission record) indicated the facility admitted the resident on 9/02/2023 with diagnoses that included hypertension (HTN - high blood pressure, normal reference range is 120/80 millimeters of Mercury [mmHg - unit of measure]), cerebral infarction (disrupted blood flow to the brain due to problems with the blood vessels that supply it; stroke), and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH- enlarged prostate [gland found in males]), A review of Resident 41' s Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-03 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility's Pharmacy Consultant (PC) conduct a Drug Regimen Review (DRR- a review of the drug regimen of a resident to identify and, if possible, prevent clinically significant medication issues) for the month of October 2023 for one of two sampled residents (Resident 9) investigated under unnecessary medications review. This deficient practice has the potential to miss the identification of any medication irregularities which could lead to the resident receiving an unnecessary medication with adverse side effects (unwanted undesirable effects that are possibly related to a drug). Findings: A review of Resident 9`s Face Sheet (admission Record) indicated the facility originally admitted the resident on 12/16/2022 and readmitted the resident on 06/17/2023, with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-a group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe) and diabetes mellitus (the body's inability to regulate the amount of sugar). A review of Resident 9's Minimum Data…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to label and store drugs (medications) and biologicals (a therapeutic substance such as drugs that target specific parts of your immune system to treat disease) in accordance with accepted professional principles as evidenced by: 1. Failure to ensure a bottle of Valproic Acid Oral Solution (a medication used to treat bipolar disorder [a mental illness that causes unusual shifts in a person's mood, energy, activity levels, and concentration] or to prevent one from having a seizure [sudden, uncontrolled burst of electrical activity in brain that can cause changes in behavior, movements, feelings and levels of consciousness]) had the date it was opened documented on the bottle. 2. Failing to ensure a bottle of Iron (an important mineral that the body needs to produce red blood cells [delivers oxygen to tissues in your body] and keep an individual in good health) supplement was left in the medication cart past its expiration date of 1/2023. These deficient practices had the potential for residents to receive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure the peripheral intravenous (IV, a medical technique that administers fluids and medications directly into a person's vein) access (the insertion of a flexible and sterile thin plastic tube, or catheter, into a blood vessel to provide medication) dressing was labeled with the insertion date for one of three sampled residents (Resident 132) observed with IV access. 2. Implement infection control practices for one of two sampled residents (Resident 179) by failing to ensure the resident's nasal cannula (a medical device that delivers extra oxygen through a tube and into your nose) tubing was dated to indicate the date it was last changed and that the tubing was not touching the floor. These deficient practices had the potential to transmit infectious microorganisms (germs that have the potential to cause disease) and placed the resident at risk for infection. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 132's Face Sheet (admission Record)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-03 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that two of two facility freezers (Freezer 1 and Freezer 2) were being maintained to good working conditions that provide a safe environment for the residents. This deficient practice had the potential to compromise the integrity of the food and placed 83 of 90 residents who received food from the kitchen at risk for foodborne illnesses (illness caused by the ingestion of contaminated food or beverages). Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview with Dietary Supervisor (DS) on 7/28/2023 at 3:57 p.m., in the kitchen, Freezer 1 internal temperature was at 18 degrees (°- unit of measure) Fahrenheit (F- unit of measure) and Freezer 2 temperature was at 14.9°F. During a concurrent observation and interview with Dietary Staff 2 (DS 2) on 7/29/2023 at 1:28 p.m., Freezer 1 internal temperature was at 12°F and Freezer 2 internal temperature was 15.3°F. During an interview with the Maintenance Supervisor (MS) on 7/29/2023 at 2:06 p.m., he stated that on 7/28/2023, there was an issue with keeping the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2026-01-02 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide at least 80 square feet (sq. ft. - unit of measurement) per resident in multiple resident bedrooms for four of 38 resident rooms (Rooms 1, 3, 9, and 11). Rooms 1, 3, 9, and 11 all have two beds in each room. This deficient practice had the potential to result in inadequate useable living space for all the residents and inadequate working space for the health caregivers.Findings: During a review of the Request for Room Size Waiver letter dated 11/1/2025, submitted by the Administrator (ADM), the letter indicated the rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER], 3, 9, and 11) did not meet the 80 sq. ft. requirement per federal regulation. The letter indicated the residents' beds were in accordance with the special needs of the residents and will not adversely affect the residents' health and safety and do not impede the ability of the residents in that room to obtain their highest practicable well-being. During a review of the document titled, Client…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide at least 80 square feet (sq. ft. - unit of measurement) per resident in multiple resident bedrooms for four of 38 resident rooms (Rooms 1, 3, 9, and 11). Rooms 1, 3, 9, and 11 all have two beds in each room. This deficient practice had the potential to result in inadequate useable living space for all the residents and inadequate working space for the health caregivers. Findings: During a review of the Request for Room Size Waiver letter dated 11/1/2024, submitted by the Administrator, the letter indicated the rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER], 3, 9, and 11) did not meet the 80 square feet requirement per federal regulation. The letter indicated the resident beds were in accordance with the special needs of the residents and will not adversely affect the residents' health and safety and do not impede the ability of the residents in that room to obtain their highest practicable well-being. The letter indicated the following: The following…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2023-11-03 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed ensure that four of 38 resident rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER], 3, 9 and 11) met the square footage requirement of 80 square feet (sq. ft.- unit of measure) per resident. Rooms 1, 3, 9 and 11 had two beds in each room. This deficient practice had the potential to result in inadequate space to provide safe nursing care and privacy for the resident. Findings: On 10/31/2023, the Administrator (ADM) provided a copy of the Client Accommodation Analysis Form (a form that documents the square footage of resident rooms). A review of the Client Accommodation Analysis indicated that four of 38 rooms did not have at least 80 square feet per resident. The Room Waiver Request Form and Client Accommodation Analysis Form indicated the following: Room No. Bed Capacity: Room Sq. Footage: Sq. Ft. per Resident 1 2 146 73.0 3 2 155 77.5 9 2 143 71.5 11 2 151 75.5 During a follow-up interview with the ADM, the ADM stated there should be at least 80 square feet per…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$78,830 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $15,640 — penalty dated 2025-01-21
- $63,190 — penalty dated 2024-07-25
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-09-12 for 14 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to THE MANDELBAUM FAMILY — 18 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 3.2 | -2.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.7 | -1.7 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 3.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
The other 17 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLOBAL SKILLED LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 08/01/2018 |
| SIMCHA AND JANET MANDELBAUM FAMILY TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 20% | since 01/01/2022 |
| THE BENTZION MANDELBAUM 2021 IRREVOCABLE GIFT TRUST NO. 2 | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 50% | since 01/01/2023 |
| THE JANET MANDELBAUM 2021 IRREVOCABLE GIFT TRUST NO 2 | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 16% | since 01/01/2023 |
| THE SIMCHA MANDELBAUM 2021 IRREVOCABLE GIFT TRUST NO. 2 | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 14% | since 01/01/2023 |
| MANDELBAUM, JANET | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 02/12/2016 |
| BOAQUINA, JANETTE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/09/2023 |
| BOYADJIAN, SHOVEK | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2022 |
| CASTRO-GARCIA, MARIA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/06/2019 |
| CHAPMAN, CAROLINA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/04/2024 |
| CRUZ, IDA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/28/2013 |
| MANDELBAUM, SIMCHA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2026 |
| MANOLONG, ORLANDO | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2017 |
| MARIANO, MARIA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/02/2013 |
| PHAM, JULIE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/16/2000 |
| REICHMAN, MITCH | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/14/2022 |
| TODIO, MARIBEL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/11/2022 |
| WILLIAMS, CLINTON | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/04/2010 |
| MANDELBAUM, BRENDA | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/28/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 31 rows in the source record cover these 19 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 056363. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-02, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.