No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Beachside Post Acute

3294 Santa Fe Avenue, Long Beach, CA 90810 · For profit - Corporation · 90 certified beds · (562) 424-0757 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (562) 424-0757 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0741)
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (32% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (41) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
Pharmacy
500 W Willow St · (562) 490-0005 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
2990 Santa Fe Ave · (562) 427-1249 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Tanaka Park, 1400 W Wardlow Rd · (562) 570-1600 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
3070 Santa Fe Ave · (424) 475-2037

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased16.5%10.2%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.5%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%7.3%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.3%1.6%3.3%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened16.4%9.8%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication8.1%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.9%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.8%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control11.2%10.2%21.2%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table9.8%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.7%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission9.4%23.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit5.5%11.2%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.922.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.501.571.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

10.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
51.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.26U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.11hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.13hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 51.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 45 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 36% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 30% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.8%CMS range 7.3–15.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge51.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge66.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge48.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified96.8%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.1%CMS range 4.0–12.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.281.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.36
RN hours/ resident / day
1.19
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.93
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.48
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.17
RN hoursweekends
31.9%
Total nursing turnover
25.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 81.7 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.48 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.36 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.93 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.98 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.68 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.44 to 0.17 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 32% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

12
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-05-29)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2025-04-11)

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

41 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 31 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure seven out of 10 sampled residents, (Resident 1, 10, 45, 52, 54, 55 and 67), who were not able to carry out Activities of Daily Living (ADLs- activities such as bathing, dressing and toileting a person performs daily) to maintain good grooming by:Failing to ensure Residents 1,10,45,52 and 54 fingernails were not long with jagged (sharp, uneven) edges.Failing to ensure Residents 55 and 67 who had long, jagged mycotic (fungus) toenails were seen by a podiatrist (foot doctor).These failures had the potential to cause pain, inflict injury and spread infection by not ensuring the fingernails for Resident's 1, 10, 45, 52 and 54 were kept short and free from jagged edges and by not ensuring Resident's 55 and 67 were seen by a podiatrist for their long, jagged mycotic toenails. Findings: 1a.During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store food in a safe and sanitary manner. The facility had 69 residents receiving oral diet. The facility failed to:1. Ensure open bags of frozen pizza dough, corn, potato puffs and hotdogs were stored in an airtight container or bags.This failure had the potential to place residents at risk for developing food borne illnesses (any illness resulting from eating contaminated/spoiled foods) and could reduce the quality of food served in the facility.Findings:During a concurrent initial kitchen observation and interview on 5/26/2026 at 8:20 a.m. with the Dietary Supervisor (DS), an open plastic bag containing frozen pizza dough, an open blue bag containing frozen corn inside a brown box, an open bag of frozen potato puffs, and an open bag of frozen hotdogs were stored in the reach in freezer. Crystalized ice was observed on the potato puffs and hotdogs. The DS stated the kitchen staff should have tied open plastic bags of frozen food items or stored them in sealed plastic bags or containers. The DS stated freezer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain and observe infection control practices. The facility failed to:1. Ensure staff performed hand hygiene in between residents when passing lunch trays.2. Ensure Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 performed hand hygiene before, and after medication administration on Resident 20.3.Observe Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP- infection control rules used in nursing homes to stop the spread of dangerous, hard-to-treat germs) before administering Resident 20's medication through gastrostomy tube (GT- a soft tube surgically inserted directly into the stomach to administer medication, fluids and nutrition).These failures had the potential to result in cross contamination (the physical movement or transfer of harmful bacteria from one person, object, or place to another) and place the residents at risk for the spread of infection. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/26/2026 at 12:11 p.m. in the hallway with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-29 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of three sampled residents (Resident 33 and Resident 88) were appropriately notified regarding the changes in their Medicare coverage through provision of Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC-given by the facility to residents at least two days before the end of a Medicare covered Part A stay or when all of Part B therapies are ending) form.This deficient practice had the potential to result in the responsible parties not being able to exercise their right to file and appeal.Findings:During a review of Resident 33's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hypertension (HTN- high blood pressure) and diabetes mellitus (DM- a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing).During a review of Resident 33's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident assessment tool) dated 3/12/2026, the MDS indicated Resident 33's cognition (ability…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-29 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the Ombudsman (an advocate for residents of nursing homes, board and care centers, and assisted living facilities) was notified for one of three sampled residents (Resident10) who was hospitalized on [DATE].This failure violated the rights of Resident 10 by not notifying the ombudsman to ensure Resident 10's discharge was safe and appropriate.Findings:During a review of Resident 10's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 10 had a diagnoses including diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), muscle weakness and dementia.During a review of Resident 10's H&P, dated 1/27/26, the H&P indicated, Resident 10 did not have the capacity to understand and make decisions.During a review of Resident 10's Minimum Data Set ( MDS-resident assessment tool) dated 5/4/26, the MDS indicated,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-29 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 6) with a positive Preadmission Screening and Resident Review Level 1 screening ([PASRR] a federal requirement to identify individuals with serious mental illness ([SMI] a mental, behavioral, or emotional condition that interferes with or limits a person's ability to function in daily life ), and intellectual disability ([ID] when a person has significant limitations in their mental abilities), prior to admission to the facility received a required PASARR Level II evaluation to determine the need for specialized services and appropriate placement.This failure had the potential to result in the resident's serious mental illness not being comprehensively evaluated, the resident not receiving specialized services as needed, and placement decisions being made without a complete assessment of the resident's mental health needs.Findings:During a review of Resident 6's admission Record, the admission Record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-29 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate care for one of ten sampled residents (Resident 20). The facility failed to:1.Ensure Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 verified the placement of the gastrostomy tube (GT-a soft tube surgically inserted directly into the stomach to administer medications, fluids, and nutrition) and checked or assessed the gastric residual volume (GRV-the amount of fluid or tube feeding formula [liquid nutrition] remaining in the stomach at a specific point in time) of Resident 20's GT prior to administering medications.This failure had the potential to place Resident 20 at risk for aspiration pneumonia (a lung infection caused by stomach or oral contents entering the lungs), vomiting, and the possibility of medications entering the wrong tract if the feeding tube was not positioned correctly, which could lead to peritonitis (inflammation or infection of the lining of the abdomen).Findings:During a review of Resident 20's admission…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-29 · tag F0741 — failed to have staff trained for behavioral health — isolated
    Ensure that the facility has sufficient staff members who possess the competencies and skills to meet the behavioral health needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff were informed of and individualized, trauma informed care (an approach to delivering care that involves understanding, recognizing and responding to the effects of all types of trauma for residents with Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD a mental health condition that can develop after experiencing or witnessing a traumatic event) for two of three residents reviewed for PTSD (Residents 28 and 66).This failure resulted in staff not being aware of each resident's PTSD triggers and increased the risk of unnecessary stress or escalation for the residents.Findings:During a review of Resident 28's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. The admission Record indicated Resident 28 with diagnoses including PTSD and dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities).During a review of Resident 28's Care Plan titled, PTSD, dated 12/22/2025, the Care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-29 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility's Social Services Director (SSD) failed to ensure two out of 10 sampled residents (Resident's 55 and 67) were seen by a podiatrist (foot doctor) for treatment of their long, jagged (sharp, uneven) mycotic (fungal) toenails.This deficient practice resulted in a delay in necessary care and services for Resident 55 and Resident 67.Findings:During a review of Resident 55's admission Record, the admission Record indicated, Resident 55 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses including Parkinson's disease(a progressive disease of the nervous system marked by tremor, muscular rigidity, and slow, imprecise movements), muscle weakness and diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing).During a review of Resident 55's Care Plan titled ADL Self-Care Deficit dated 2/24/26 the Care Plan indicated, Resident 55 was totally dependent with personal hygiene. The Care Plan indicated, Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-29 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications are administered safely and in accordance with accepted standards of practice on two of nine sampled residents (Resident 20 and Resident 50). The facility failed to:1.Ensure Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 verified the placement of the gastrostomy tube (GT-a soft tube surgically inserted directly into the stomach to administer medications, fluids, and nutrition) and checked or assessed the gastric residual volume (GRV-the amount of fluid or tube feeding formula [liquid nutrition] remaining in the stomach at a specific point in time) of Resident 20's GT prior to administering medications. 2. Ensure LVN 3 assessed Resident 50's pulse rate before administering Metoprolol, (a medication used to treat high blood pressure by relaxing blood vessels and slowing the pulse rate) with a pulse based hold parameter (a physician ordered instruction that guides when the medication should or should not be given).These failures placed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 31 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored properly on one of two medication storage rooms. The facility failed to:1. Ensure Resident 40's discontinued Risperidone (antipsychotic -[a type of medication prescribed to treat mental health problem]) was disposed of and not kept in a box labeled extra medicines in the Medication Storage room.2. Ensure expired hemorrhoidal ointment (medicated jelly or paste used to soothe swollen, inflamed veins in the rectal area) was not stored in the medication storage room.These failures resulted in expired and discontinued medications being available in the medication storage area, increasing the risk of medication administration error and having the potential to unintentional dispensing of expired or discontinued medications to residents.Findings:1. During a review of Resident 40's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-29 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — isolated
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food service staff were competent in reading test strips (a small, treated piece of paper or plastic designed to interact with a sample and reveal the presence, absence, or concentration of specific chemical substances) used for testing chlorine (deep cleaning and sanitizing agent) in the dishwashing machine.This failure had the potential to put residents at risk for food borne illness (any illness resulting from eating contaminated/spoiled foods) due to inability to read and interpret the test strips used for testing the correct range of sanitizer solutions for the dishwashing machine.Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview with Dietary Aide (DA)1, DA 1 demonstrated on how to check the amount of chlorine in the dishwashing machine after the final rinse by dipping a test strip in the water and comparing the test strip to the color chart of the test strip container. DA 1 stated the strip read 50 parts per million (PPM- unit of measurement) and the kitchen staff follows 50-200 PPM for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized care plan with measurable objectives, timeframes, and interventions to prevent or reduce the risk of contracture (loss of motion of a joint associated with stiffness and joint deformity) development for two of seven sampled residents (Residents 14 and 33) who were identified as having range of motion (ROM, full movement potential of a joint) limitations and were at high risk for contracture development. These deficient practices had the potential to negatively affect the delivery of necessary care and services for Residents 14 and 33. Findings: During a review of Resident 14's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including a left below knee amputation (BKA, surgical removal of a limb [extremities] below the level of the knee involving the removal of the foot and ankle joint), chronic ulcer (sore…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY b. During a review of Resident 56's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 56 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease (a progressive disease of the nervous system marker by tremor, muscular rigidity, and slow, imprecise movement) and dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities). During a review of Resident 56's MDS dated [DATE], the MDS indicated Resident 56 had severe cognitive impairment and was dependent (helper does all the effort) with ADL's. During a review of Resident 57's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 57 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder (a mental illness that combines symptoms of schizophrenia and a mood disorder like depression {mood disorder that causes persistent feelings of sadness and loss of interest} and mania {mental state of an extreme high or depressive lows} and Parkinson's disease (a progressive disease of the nervous system marked…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-11 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide treatments and services to one of seven sampled residents (Resident 14) to improve, prevent and/or limit a decline in joint (where two bones meet) range of motion (ROM, full movement potential of a joint) by failing to: 1.Ensure Resident 14's Joint Mobility Assessments (JMA, a brief assessment of a resident's ROM in both arms and both legs), dated 9/10/2024, 12/11/2024, and 3/13/2025, included the assessment of Resident 14's left knee ROM. 2.Ensure Resident 14's Quarterly JMA, dated 6/2024, was completed. These deficient practices had the potential to result in missed opportunities for identifications of ROM declines and cause Resident 14 to have a decline in overall physical functioning and ROM leading to contracture (loss of motion of a joint associated with stiffness and joint deformity) development. Findings: During a review of Resident 14's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 14 was admitted to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-11 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility's Minimum Data Set Coordinator (MDSC) and Minimum Data Set Assistant (MDSA) were competent in providing quarterly Joint Mobility Assessments (JMA, brief assessment of a resident's range of motion in both arms and both legs) affecting one of seven sampled residents (Resident 14) with limited range of motion (ROM, full movement potential of a joint). This deficient practice resulted in multiple missed assessments of Resident 14's left knee, failure to identify inaccurate documentation and assessment of Resident 14's left leg, missed opportunities to identify and report ROM decline, and had the potential to lead to ROM decline and contracture (loss of motion of a joint associated with stiffness and joint deformity) development. Findings: During a review of Resident 14's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure open bag of frozen sausages was stored properly in the freezer. 2. Ensure freezer temperature was maintained at 0-degree Fahrenheit (F-unit of measurement) while frozen vegetables were stored. 3. Ensure gloves were used by kitchen staff when serving cooked food during tray line. 4. Ensure proper donning of glove and handwashing was observed when the [NAME] switched tasks from tray line to prepare food in the microwave. These failures had the potential to put residents at risk for food-borne illnesses ( any illness resulting from ingestion of food contaminated with bacteria, viruses, or parasites) and affect the quality of food. Findings: 1.During an initial kitchen observation and interview on 4/8/2025, at 8:01 a.m. with Dietary Manager (DM), an open bag of frozen sausages was inside an open box. Observed the frozen sausages had ice crystals on the surfaces.DM stated the open bag of frozen sausages should be stored in a sealed plastic bag. During an interview on 4/9/2025, at 1:30 p.m. with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-11 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of seven sampled resident's (Residents 14 and 19) medical records were accurately documented when: a.Resident 14's Joint Mobility Assessments (JMA, a brief assessment of a resident's ROM in both arms and both legs), dated 9/10/2024, 12/11/2024, and 3/13/2025, inaccurately indicated Resident 14 had a left above knee amputation (AKA, surgical removal of a limb above the level of the knee) instead of the correct diagnosis of a left below knee amputation (BKA, surgical removal of a limb below the level of the knee involving the removal of the foot and ankle joint). b.Resident 19's Restorative Nursing Aide (nursing aide program that help residents maintain any progress made after therapy intervention to maintain their function) physician's order inaccurately indicated for RNA to use a two-wheeled walker (mobility aid with wheels on the front two legs of the device) for walking exercises with Resident 19 instead of a platform walker…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain and observe infection control practices by failing to: a.Change and label tube feeding water bag for Resident 28. b.Perform hand hygiene during wound care dressing change for Resident 56. c.Ensure Physical Therapist 1 (PT 1) wore an isolation gown (protective apparel used to protect the wearer from the transfer of microorganisms and body fluids) while assessing Resident 14's left leg which required direct contact with Resident 14 who was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP, infection control intervention using gown and gloves during high contact resident care activities designed reduce the transmission of multi-drug-resistant organisms). d. Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 5 failed to sanitize blood pressure cuff in between residents. e. Ensure sanitary handling and transport of soiled linens. These deficient practice had the potential to result in cross contamination (the physical movement or transfer of harmful bacteria from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-11 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure reach in freezer for frozen vegetables and freezer for frozen meat products in the kitchen were maintained and kept in a safe and operating condition by failing to: 1. Follow their policy and procedure titled Freezer Storage regarding maintaining a temperature of 0-degree Fahrenheit (F- unit of measurement) or lower . This failure had the potential to expose residents at risk for food-borne illness (any illness resulting from ingestion of food contaminated with bacteria, viruses or parasites). Findings: During an initial kitchen tour observation on 4/8/2025, at 8:01 a.m. with Dietary Manager (DM), DM verified the internal thermometer of the reach in freezer for frozen vegetables was reading at 10 degrees Fahrenheit (F- unit of measurement) and the reach in freezer for meat products was reading at 24 degrees F. DM stated the kitchen personnel just removed some food items from the freezers that was why the temperatures are not 0-degree F on both freezers. During an interview on 4/8/2025, 2:15 p.m. with an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to secure the personal belongings for one of six sampled residents (Resident 39) by misplacing Resident 39's phone charger, wheelchair, and clothes. This failure had the potential to negatively affect the Resident 39's psychosocial well-being. Findings: During a review of Resident 39's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was initially admitted on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] to the facility with diagnoses that included irritable bowel syndrome ( common condition that affects the digestive system causing abdominal pain, bloating, and changes in bowel habits including diarrhea or constipation or both), hematemesis (vomiting of blood)sepsis (a life-threatening blood infection),and muscle weakness. During a review of Resident 39's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident assessment tool) dated 3/30/2025, the MDS indicated the resident's cognition (thought process) is intact and required substantial/ maximal assistance (helper does…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-11 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a preadmission screening and annual review of a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR- a federal requirement to help ensure that individuals are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care) was accurately documented for two of four reviewed residents (Residents 38 and 57). This deficient practice had the potential to result in an inappropriate placement and delay of needed services for Resident 38 and 57. Findings: During a review of Resident 38's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 38 was admitted to the facility 12/18/2024 with diagnoses including schizophrenia (a mental illness that is characterized by disturbances in thought) and bipolar disorder (sometimes called manic-depressive disorder; mood swings that range from the lows of depression to elevated periods of emotional highs). During a review of Resident 38's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident assessment tool) dated 4/2/2025, the MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-11 · tag F0741 — failed to have staff trained for behavioral health — isolated
    Ensure that the facility has sufficient staff members who possess the competencies and skills to meet the behavioral health needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify and address one of four sampled residents (Resident 53) behavioral health needs by failing: A. to ensure Brief Trauma Screening Questionnaire (tool used to assess an individual's potential exposure to traumatic events and their current PTSD symptoms and this tool is used to help identify individuals who may need further assessment or support for trauma) for Resident 53 who had a diagnosis of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD-a disorder in which a person has difficulty recovering after experiencing or witnessing a traumatic event) was assessed and screened properly by social service personnel. This failure had the potential for Resident 53 for not receiving appropriate care to meet his behavioral needs. Findings: During a review of Resident 53's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was originally admitted on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] to the facility with diagnoses that included PTSD, dementia( progressive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-11 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) failed to ensure effective oversight of the facility and implementation of the facility's plan of correction (POC) of the deficient practices identified during the previous recertification. This deficient practice resulted in the facility to have repeat deficiencies in comprehensive resident centered care plans, competent nursing staff, safe operating equipment, and the prevention of a decrease in range of motion (ROM- full movement potential of a joint). Findings: During a review of the facility's Statement of Deficiencies for the 2024 Recertification survey indicated the following repeat deficiencies in comprehensive resident centered care plans, competent nursing staff, safe operating equipment, and the prevention of a decrease in range of motion (ROM). During a concurrent interview and record review on 4/11/2025 at with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated she will continue to work on and make further changes for the issues that were still areas of concerns. The DON stated they…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-26 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow up on and document not administering a consented pneumococcal vaccine (a vaccine for a bacterial infection that can cause a serious lung, brain, or blood infection) for one out of three residents (Resident 1). This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1 potentially contracting pneumonia (a lung infection). Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus (DM - a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), generalized muscle weakness, abnormalities with gait (a person ' s manner of walking), mobility (the ability to move freely or lack thereof), and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). During a review of Resident 1 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated 11/8/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 1 ' s cognition (ability to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident (Resident 1), who was receiving renal dialysis (a procedure which removes excess water, toxins, and solutes from the blood when the kidneys are no longer naturally able to do so) and received medications to treat elevated heart rate and blood pressure, primary care doctor (MD 1) was informed after refusing dialysis on 9/5/2024 and 9/10/2024 and refusing medication on 9/2/2024, 9/3/2024, 9/4/2024, 9/10/2024, 9/11/2024, and 9/12/2024 for one of three sampled residents. These failures resulted in Resident 1 ' s MD 1 being unaware of Resident 1 ' s refusal of medication and dialysis treatments and had the potential to cause a delay in medical intervention by MD 1. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including end stage renal disease (a permanent condition where…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-19 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain and enhance the resident ' s dignity by prohibiting the use of motorized wheelchairs in the facility for two of three sampled residents (Resident 1 and 2). This deficient practice had the potential to negatively affect the residents' psychosocial wellbeing. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 1 ' s Face Sheet (admission record), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia (immobility of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (muscle weakness on one side) following cerebral infarction (stroke: cluster of brain cells dying due to not getting enough blood) affecting right dominant (hand instinctively used) side, and idiopathic peripheral autonomic neuropathy (never disorder that affects the functions of digestion, heart, and bladder). During a review of Resident 1 ' s Minimum Data Set [(MDS) a standardized assessment and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-19 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the microwave in the rehabilitation gym (rehab gym) was not used to store plastic utensils, plastic straws, and paper plates in the microwave cavity (empty space) and was used for it was intended purpose and in accordance with manufacturer's guidelines. This failure had the potential to cause burns, electric shock, and injury to any staff member, resident, or visitor in the facility. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/18/2024 at 11:55 a.m., in the rehab gym, a white microwave was sitting on a table near the wall with plastic utensils, plastic straws, and a stack of paper plates stored inside the microwave cavity. The Director of Rehabilitation (DOR) stated the microwave was in working order and was used as a storage unit to hold utensils, straws, and paper plates when not in use. The DOR stated the purpose of the microwave was to heat food and items such as utensils, straws, and paper plates should not be stored in the microwave cavity because it was unsafe and could cause…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care in a manner that maintained or enhanced a resident's dignity and respect in full recognition of their individuality for one of four sampled residents (Resident 39) by: 1. Failing to provide ADL care for Resident 39 by emptying the urinal timely. Resident 39's urinal filled with urine and was left on the resident's bedside table. This failure resulted in Resident 39 feeling embarrassed and had the potential to lower Resident 39's self-esteem. Findings: During a review of Resident 39's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including human immune deficiency virus ([HIV], a virus that attacks the body's immune system), atrial fibrillation (irregular heart rhythm that begins in your heart's upper chambers),and type 2 diabetes mellitus (a condition that happens because of a problem in the way the body regulates and uses a sugar as a fuel). During a review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized care plan with measurable objectives, timeframes, and interventions to improve, maintain, or prevent a further decline in range of motion (ROM, full movement potential of a joint) for one of seven sampled residents (Resident 25) who was identified as having severe ROM limitations in the left shoulder upon admission and ROM concerns. This failure had the potential to negatively affect the delivery of necessary care and services for Resident 25, lead to contracture (loss of motion of a joint) development, and a decline in overall physical functioning such as the ability to move, eat and dress. Findings: During a review of Resident 25's admission Record indicated Resident 25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including peripheral vascular disease (reduced circulation of blood to a body part due to a narrowed or blocked blood vessel), acquired absence of the right leg below the knee…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review facility failed to ensure one of four sampled residents (Resident 50) received care and services to perform activities of daily living (ADLs, basic activities such as eating, dressing, toileting) when facility failed to: 1.Provide shower/bed bath to Resident 50 since resident's re-admission to the facility on 2/28/2024. 2.Provide grooming including haircuts, and nail trimming since Resident 50's re-admission to the facility on 2/28/2024. 3. Ensure Resident 50's refusal of care including showers and personal hygiene was care planned. These failures resulted in Resident 50's experienced poor hygiene, appeared disheveled, loss of self-esteem, felt embarrassed and look unkempt. Findings: During a review of Resident 50's admission Records indicated Resident 50 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including heart failure (heart muscle is unable to pump enough blood to meet the body's needs for blood and oxygen), end…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-19 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide treatments and services to maintain and limit a decline in joint (where two bones meet) range of motion (ROM, full movement potential of a joint) for one of seven sampled residents (Resident 25) by failing to ensure the following: a.Resident 25 received treatment and services to maintain and prevent a decline in ROM of both arms. b.Director of Rehabilitation (DOR) assessed Resident 25's both arms before establishing an RNA program for ROM exercises to Resident 25's both arms. These failures led to the decline in joint range of motion of Resident 25's both hands and right shoulder and had the potential to lead to contractures (loss of motion of a joint associated with stiffness and joint deformity), decline in physical functioning such as the ability to eat and dress, and injury. Findings: During a review of Resident 25's admission Record indicated Resident 25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-19 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility's Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) were provided the appropriate abuse and dementia training for one of seven sampled staff Certified Nursing assistant 3 (CNA 3). This failure had the potential for the facility not be able to assess the skills necessary to provide nursing services to assure resident safety and to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 4/19/2024 at 11:31 a.m. with the Director of Staff Development (DSD), the DSD stated when there was a new hire, the staff will have an orientation and will complete various trainings such as abuse (cruel and violent treatment of a person) and dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions) training prior to starting. DSD stated the required training for dementia training was one hour and abuse training was two hours annually. DSD stated there was a pre and posttest after an abuse training, but they do not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-19 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an annual performance evaluation (a measurable pattern of knowledge, skills, abilities, behaviors, and other characteristics in performing that an individual need to perform work roles or occupational functions successfully) was performed every year for one Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 2. This failure had the potential for the facility not be able to assess the skills necessary for CNA 2 to provide nursing services to assure resident safety and to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 4/19/2024 at 12:14 p.m. with Director of Staff Development (DSD), DSD stated staff performance evaluations were done yearly. DSD stated CNA 2 has been working at the facility since 2019 and her last employee evaluation was on 4/19/2022. DSD stated the employee evaluation were used to measure staff quality of work, knowledge, and skills. DSD stated CNA 2 employee evaluation was not done for 2023. DSD…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-19 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility's nursing staff failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident 74) received antibiotic (treat infection) medication as prescribed by the physician in a timely manner. This failure had the potential to result in ineffective treatment of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteria (MRSA: group of gram-positive bacteria that is responsible for several difficult-to-treat infections) in the blood. Findings: During a review of Resident admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 74 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute osteomyelitis (serious infection of the bone that developed rapidly) on right ankle and foot, MRSA infection, Type II diabetes (a condition in which the body fails to metabolize (process) glucose (sugar) correctly ), chronic kidney disease (CKD: damaged kidneys that cannot filter blood and waste), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD: group…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-02 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one of six sampled resident's (Resident 1's) pain level was documented prior to administering Morphine Sulfate (a narcotic substance that dull the senses and relieve pain and can be highly addicting) and Methadone (a powerful drug used for pain relief) from 12/7/2023 to 12/12/2023 and failed to document Resident 1's pain level every shift from 12/7/2023 to 12/ 12/2023. These deficient practices had the potential to negatively affect Resident 1's pain management regimen. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (face sheet), the face sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted at the facility on 12/7/2023 with a diagnosis that included atherosclerosis of the aorta (progressive buildup of plaque in the largest artery in the body), liver cirrhosis (a condition where the liver, organ that filters waste and toxins from the blood, is permanently damaged), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a group of diseases that cause airflow blockage and breathing-related problems to the body) and palliative care (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-05 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the responsible party (RP) for one of three sampled residents was informed of the risks and benefits before reducing Resident 1 ' s psychoactive medication (a drug that changes brain function and results in alterations in perception, mood, consciousness, or behavior). This deficient practice violated the residents' right to make an informed decision regarding the use of psychoactive medications. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s face sheet (admission record), the face sheet indicated that Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with the diagnoses that include Parkinson ' s disease (progressive disorder that affects the nervous system and the parts of the body controlled by the nerves), major depressive disorder (mental disorder characterized by loose of interest in daily life) , anxiety (severe mental disorder characterized by extreme worry), dementia (problems with memory, thinking, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-10-21 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to document a completed facility wide assessment for 86 of 90 residents by: a. Failing to ensure Infection Preventionist Nurse (IPN) involvement in completing the assessment and failing to include the need for an IPN in the facility. b. Failing to describe the resident population profile by not indicating the average daily resident census (number of residents in the facility), the residents' acuity (allocation of clinical expertise and caregiver resources needed to provide care) levels. c. Failing to describe ethnic, cultural, and religious factors that affect the type of care needed for the facility's resident population. These deficient practices had a potential to result in the provision of incompetent care and services to the facility's resident population. Findings: During a record review of the Facility assessment tool, revised 10/19/2022, the tool indicated the following: a. The IPN did not participate in completing the tool on from 10/13/ 2022 to 10/18/2022. b. The average daily resident census and the residents'…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement Coronavirus disease ([COVID-19] a potentially severe respiratory illness caused by a corona virus and characterized by fever, coughing, and shortness of breath) outbreak response measures (acts and procedures to minimize the spread of a disease) as evidenced by the facility failure to: a.Ensure two of two Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA 3 and 4) doffed (took off) the N95 mask (a respiratory protective device designed to achieve a very close facial fit for effective filtration of airborne particles) they wore inside the isolation (rooms designated to keep residents, who have certain medical conditions, such as infections, separate from other people while they receive medical care) rooms of Covid-19 positive residents (Resident 4 and 5) prior to exiting the resident's room and donned (put on) a clean N95 mask after exiting residents' isolation rooms and walking in the hallway of the resident care areas. b.Screen one of one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-21 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review facility failed to ensure one out of five residents (Resident 11) received the pneumococcal vaccine (medication to protect against pneumonia [infection of the lungs]) after consent was obtained on 11/28/2022; and the facility failed to ensure two of five sampled residents (Resident 12, and 13) were offered pneumococcal vaccination yearly after refusal. These deficient practices placed three residents at a higher risk of acquiring and transmitting pneumonia to other residents in the facility. Findings: a. During a record review of Resident's 11 admission record, the admission record indicated Resident 11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re- admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus (disease that causes human immunodeficiency virus (HIV- virus [germ] that attacks the body's immune system[way the body protects against outside invaders]), and hypertensive heart disease ( problems with the heart that can cause high blood pressure [measure of how…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 transcribed (write down) and carried out the physician order for Augmentin (antibiotic [medicine that fight infection]) and Loratadine (medication to treat allergy symptom) immediately after receiving the order on 10/21/2023 at 7:35 a.m. for one of three sampled resident (Resident 8). The deficient practice resulted in a more than six-hour delay of care, treatment, and relief of symptoms (headache and right cheek pain) for Resident 8. Findings: During a review of Resident 8's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including COVID 19 (a highly contagious infection, caused by a virus [germ]that can easily spread from person to person), atrial fibrillation (irregular heart beat), and essential hypertension (high blood pressure [a measure of how forceful the blood pumps in the body]) During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE MANDELBAUM FAMILY — 18 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 53.2+0.8 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.7+0.3 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 53.9+0.1 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.5+0.5 vs chain
The other 17 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
CASTRO-GARCIA, MARIAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 11/06/2019
MANDELBAUM, JANETIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/04/2021
DEL MUNDO, MARIELLEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/06/2023
ENCARNACION, CAROLYNIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/18/2023
MANDELBAUM, SIMCHAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2026
NUNEZ, AMALIAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/16/2024
PHAM, JULIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/16/2000
RAMOS, MARTINIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/1998
STAANA, GINAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/03/2025
TRIPPEL, MARIAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/03/2024
WAN, CHOKIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2019
WILLIAMS, CLINTONIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/04/2010
MANDELBAUM, BRENDAIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/28/2026
HANSENOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
MANDELBAUM FAMILY HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
SKILLSERVE INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/20/2007

CMS files one row per role, so the 28 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$11.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-5.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.5M
Related-party expense13% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 59%Medicare 7%Other / private 34%

This home reported $1.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$404per resident / day
operating cost
$12,278per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$384per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055123. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-29, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next