No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Madison Post Acute

2520 Madison, Everett, WA 98203 · For profit - Partnership · 59 certified beds · (425) 353-4040 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (425) 353-4040 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Resident-funds citations (F0565, F0569)$71,318 in federal fines
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (35% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565, F0569)
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (45) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $71,318 in federal fines (most recent 2023-10-16)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
7024 Evergreen Way · (360) 863-6696 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
6807 Evergreen Way · (425) 438-9380 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
6732 Beverly Blvd · (425) 347-5822 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
2814 Colby Ave · (425) 954-4071

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased19.8%14.2%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight12.5%5.5%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%1.0%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.7%1.6%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms16.4%17.7%6.5%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%2.6%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened49.6%17.2%16.1%check this — see note marked dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication5.9%12.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine71.4%93.8%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers0.6%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control19.1%22.5%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table7.5%15.1%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.0%1.3%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine40.8%82.0%79.4%worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

† This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 33 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

52.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
66.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.53U.S. median 0.30
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.25hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.20hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 66.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 27 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.53 therapist hours per resident per day in 2025Q4 — more than 85% of the 13,714 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 38% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 14% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF52.0%CMS range 39.5–65.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.0%CMS range 7.2–17.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge66.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge48.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge63.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified12.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.—
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.—
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.—
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.131.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.81
RN hours/ resident / day
0.98
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.43
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.21
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.57
RN hoursweekends
35.2%
Total nursing turnover
64.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 59 beds and averages 51.5 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.21 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.81 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.43 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.74 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.16 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.77 to 0.61 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 35% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

16 ↑
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-06-26)
14
at the previous standard inspection (2025-07-21)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

45 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 35 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · F2026-06-26 · tag F0572 — widespread
    Give residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, observation and record review the facility failed to periodically inform the residents of their rights after the resident was admitted to the facility. This failure had the potential to diminish the residents' quality of life.Findings included .According to the facility policy titled Resident Rights, dated 2025, documented, the resident has the right to be informed of his or her rights and of rules and regulations governing resident conduct and responsibilities during his or her stay in the facility.In the Resident Council interview on 06/22/2026 at 12:45 PM the residents in attendance (11, 14, 15, 58 and 63) were asked if the staff talked about and reviewed the rights of the residents. Resident 58 stated staff had not talked to them about resident's rights. Resident 63 stated they remembered reading resident rights in their admission packet but that was four years ago. The rest of the residents stated no.Review of Resident Council minutes from April to May 2026 did not show documented evidence that residents' rights were reviewed.In an observation on 06/23/2026…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-06-26 · tag F0920 — widespread
    Provide at least one room set aside to use as a resident dining room and for activities, that is a good size, with good lighting, air flow and furniture.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure dining rooms included enough space for residents to dine, and for residents to enter and exit a dining room without having to move other residents in 1 of 1 dining rooms. This failure created risk for the inability of staff to respond quickly in an emergency situation, and risk for decreased quality of life for residents unable to dine with their peers. Findings included .In an observation on 06/22/2026 at 8:18 AM, the facility was observed to have one room designated for dining. The room included one refrigerator and one section of upper and lower cabinets. There was one table in the back left corner facing a wall with one resident sitting facing the wall. There were three other square tables in the room. A total of seven residents were in the room for breakfast. All seven residents were in wheelchairs. One resident wheelchair blocked the doorway, and there was no space to walk between the two center tables without moving residents. There was visible table space at tables for 10 residents. The posted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-06-26 · tag F0552 — pattern
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain a psychotropic medication consent for 4 of 6 residents (Residents 3, 16, 72, and 77) reviewed for psychotropic medications (medication that affects the mind, altering mood, thoughts, perceptions, or behavior). This failure placed residents at risk of receiving medications without being informed of the possible risks, or side effects, and a decreased quality of life.Findings included .According to the facility policy titled, Use of Psychotropic Medication(s), dated 2025, the facility will document that the resident or resident representative was informed in advance of the risks and benefits of the proposed care and the resident had the right to accept or decline treatment. RESIDENT 72> Resident 72 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis to include depression. Review of Resident 72's provider's order documented Mirtazapine (an antidepressant) for depression, dated 06/14/2026. Review Resident 72's Medication Administration Record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-06-26 · tag F0640 — pattern
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident MDS (Minimum Data Set, a required assessment tool) assessments were transmitted as required and within the required timeframes for 3 of 5 residents (Residents 4, 14 and 50) reviewed. This failure had the potential to affect facility CMI (Case Mix Index) and facility payments. Findings included . According to the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, Chapter 2, MDS Discharge Assessments must be electronically transmitted within 14 days of the event that triggered the form. Quarterly MDS Assessments must be electronically transmitted within 14 calendar days of the completion date. <Resident 4> Review of Resident 4's MDS assessment records documented their Discharge MDS dated [DATE] was created and assessment data was collected. The MDS remained in completed status and had not been transmitted within 14 days. <Resident 14> Review of Resident 14's MDS assessment records documented a Quarterly MDS assessment had been created and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-06-26 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Date Set (MDS-an assessment tool) were accurate for 3 of 15 residents (Residents 34, 56 and 72) reviewed for resident assessment. The failure to accurately complete MDS assessments resulted in lack of triggering and completion of Care Area Assessments (CAA -triggered by MDS responses which indicates additional assessments for specific care areas), lack of comprehensive care plan development, inaccurate facility payment, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . <RESIDENT 72> Resident 72 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis to include rheumatoid arthritis (chronic autoimmune disease where the immune system mistakenly attacks the lining of the joints), depression and metabolic encephalopathy (a problem in the brain that is caused by a chemical imbalance in the blood). <VISION> Review of Resident 72's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] under section B for vision, documented that the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-26 · tag F0645 — pattern
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR- assessment/a federal requirement for Medicaid-certified nursing facilities to ensure individuals, especially those with mental illness, seeking admission are appropriately placed and receive necessary services) level I were referred for a PASRR level II and followed up on for 6 of 7 residents (Residents 2, 3, 30, 56, 72, and 77) reviewed for PASRR. This failure placed residents at risk of unmet mental health services and a diminished quality of life. Findings included .<RESIDENT 56> Resident 56 admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included substance abuse, mood and anxiety disorders. Review of Resident 56's level I PASSR dated [DATE], identified mood disorder, anxiety disorder and substance abuse disorder and identified a level II evaluation was required. A Notice of Determination was noted in the record dated [DATE], which identified that Resident 56 had been in the skilled nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure development and implementation of comprehensive care plans for 7 of 14 residents (Residents 2, 11, 30, 34, 53, 72 and 77) reviewed for comprehensive care plans. These failures placed residents at risk for unmet care needs, inadequate pain interventions, unnecessary medications, skin issues, accidents, and decreased quality of life. Findings included .According to the facility policy titled Comprehensive Care Plans, dated 2025, documented the comprehensive care plan would describe at a minimum, the following: the services that were to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. <ELOPEMENT RISK> <RESIDENT 11> Resident 11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis to include dementia. Review of the elopement binder at the front desk on 06/23/2026, showed Resident 11 as one of the residents who were at high risk to elope. Review of Resident 11's elopement…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-06-26 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — pattern
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure there was eight consecutive hours of Registered Nurse (RN) coverage each day. Failure to have adequate RN coverage placed residents at risk for inadequate assessment of medical conditions which could cause their health to decline. Review of the 30-day staffing pattern form, dated 05/23/2026 - 06/22/2206, documented six of the 31 days did not have eight consecutive hours of RN coverage.During an interview on 06/25/2026 10:06 AM, Staff B, Director of Nursing services, stated they were aware that they did not meet the requirement for RN coverage as they did not have enough RNs on staff. Refer to WAC 388-97-1080 (8)

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff were following USDA Food Code requirements for hair restraints in 1 of 1 facility kitchens. Failure of staff with facial hair to wear beard restraints created the potential for physical and biological contamination of facility food. Findings included .In an observation through the kitchen door on 06/22/2026 at 8:00 AM, one cook and two other kitchen staff were observed in the food area plating breakfast items. Both the cook and one of the two dietary staff were observed with beards and neither were wearing beard coverings. In an observation and interview on 06/24/2026 at 11:52 AM, Staff K, Dietary Manager, and Staff O, Dietary Aid were observed with facial hair and without beard coverings in the food service areas. Staff O stated they believed they were not required to wear beard restraints because their facial hair was not over an inch long. Staff O further stated they did not have a supply of beard restraints due to the belief they were not required. Staff O stated they would have to order beard…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP -infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms requiring staff to wear gowns and gloves during high-contact resident care activities) were observed for 2 of 3 residents (Resident 6 and 76) sampled for medication administration and 1 of 1 resident (Resident 47) observed during a Hoyer lift (an assistive medical device used to safely transfer residents between a bed to wheelchair) transfer. These failures placed residents at risk of infection and diminished quality of life. Findings included .According to facility policy titled: Enhanced Barrier Precautions, dated 2025, documented EBP will be used during care of feeding tubes and central lines, and high contact care activities such as transferring. <MEDICATION ADMINISTRATION><RESIDENT 6>Resident 6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 6 has a feeding tube. In an observation on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 35 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-26 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to timely complete a Significant Change in Status Assessment (SCSA) Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment tool) for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 53), reviewed for SCSA. This failure placed the residents at risk for delayed care planning, unmet care needs, and diminished quality of life. Findings included .Review of the Long-Term Care Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual, (a guide directing staff on how to accurately assess the status of residents) Version 1.20.1, dated October 2025, showed that an SCSA is a comprehensive assessment that must be completed when the Interdisciplinary Team determines a resident meets the significant change guidelines for a major decline or improvement in status that impacts more than one area of health status, and the condition is not expected to return to baseline within two weeks.Resident 53 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].Review of a quarterly MDS dated [DATE], coded Resident 53 with no pressure ulcer,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-26 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure professional standards were met for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 76) sampled for intravenous (IV-into the vein) medication administration. The failure to have a physician's order for the IV flush (injecting a sterile solution to clear medications, prevent blood clots and verify the line is working) placed resident at risk for complications included blockage of line and adverse outcomes. Findings included . According to the facility policy titled Intravenous Therapy, dated 2025, the policy documented to utilize a 10 milliliter (ml) syringe of normal saline to inject and confirm patency of vascular access device per protocol. Resident 76 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include pyogenic arthritis (serious, painful bacterial infection of joint space). In an observation on 06/24/2026 at 4:06 PM, Staff N, Registered Nurse flushed Resident 76's central line (long flexible tube inserted into a large vein from the chest…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-26 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received proper assistive devices to maintain their hearing abilities for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 30) reviewed for hearing services. This failure placed the resident at risk for declined communication and decreased quality of life. Findings included .Review of the facility policy titled, Hearing and Vision Services, copyright date 2026, documented employees would assist the resident with the use of any devices or adaptive equipment needed to maintain hearing. Resident 30 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. In an interview and observation on 06/22/2026 at 8:34 AM, Resident 30 stated they could not hear when asked questions and they needed their hearing aids. It was observed the resident was not wearing hearing aids. In an observation on 06/22/2026 at 1:34 PM, Resident 30 was observed not wearing hearing aids. In an interview and observation on 06/23/2026 at 8:56 AM, Resident 30 stated they needed their hearing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-26 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure dialysis communication documents were filled out after the resident had their dialysis appointments and returned to the facility for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 77) reviewed for dialysis. This failure placed Resident 77 at risk of inadequate or lack of assessment and documentation upon arrival back at the facility, undetected dialysis complications, and a decreased quality of life.Findings included .Review of the facility provided policy ''Hemodialysis,'' with an implementation date of 06/10/2026 documented the facility would assure that each resident received care and services for the provision of hemodialysis consistent with professional standards of practice. The ongoing assessment of the resident's condition and monitoring for complications before and after dialysis treatments The nurse would monitor and document the status of the resident's access site upon return from the dialysis treatment Resident 77 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-26 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure routine and emergency dental services were provided for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 56) reviewed for dental services. This failure had the potential to result in infection, pain and decreased quality of life. Findings included . Resident 56 admitted [DATE]. Review of the Nursing admission assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident had missing and broken teeth. A baseline care plan was initiated related to oral/dental problems. In an observation and interview on 06/23/2026 at 9:24 AM, Resident 56 stated their teeth were terrible. Resident 56 opened their mouth and pointed to their lower jaw with visible tooth fragments and missing teeth. Resident 56 said their teeth had been in bad shape for a long time and said they had been seen by someone here at the facility who told them they needed them all pulled. Resident 56 stated they had a prior dentist and was able to state the name and place of their community dental office. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-24 · tag F0645 — pattern
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 3 of 5 residents reviewed for pre-admission screening and resident review (PASRR) received the required screening for mental health needs prior to admission for (Resident 1) and screenings were updated as required for (Residents 2 and 3). This failure placed the residents at risk of not receiving timely and necessary services to meet their mental health needs.Findings included.Review of a facility policy titled, Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review revised date 09/2025, documented any resident with a positive Level 1 screen must have a Level 2 evaluation conducted prior to admission.<RESIDENT 1>Resident 1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of anxiety.Review of the PASSR level 1 screen, dated 09/26/2025, documented Resident 1 required a Level 2 evaluation for treatment of anxiety and depression.Review of a social services note, dated 09/29/2025, showed the state PASSR coordinator was contacted as resident required a level 2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-07-21 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the person designated to serve as the Director of Food and Nutrition Services (Staff S) had the required qualifications. This failure placed all residents at risk of receiving dietary services from staff without the required competencies and skills to carry out food and nutrition services.Findings included .In an interview on 07/16/2025 at 9:47 AM, Staff S, Dietary Manager (DM), stated they were not a certified DM. Staff S stated they were enrolled in the educational program to obtain their certification. Staff S stated the facility was using the certification of Staff T, Assistant DM, in place of their certification.In a review of the staff roster, undated, documented Staff S was the culinary director.\In a review of the facility assessment dated [DATE], documented Staff S as the certified dietary manager.In an interview on 07/21/2025 at 11:04 AM, Staff A, Administrator, stated Staff T was the dietary manager last year and thought the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, and served under sanitary conditions in one of one facility kitchens, and one of one snack/nourishment refrigerators. The failure to ensure cleanliness of the kitchen, label opened food/beverage items, wash hands, and ensure dishwashing temperature were maintained at the proper temperature. These failures placed all residents at risk for their food to be contaminated, development of food borne illnesses, and consuming spoiled food.Findings included.<CLEANLINESS>On 07/17/2025 at 11:04 AM observed the dishwashing area to have a large hole (approximately 6 -8 inches) in the wall underneath the dishwashing basin. Observed a rusty gallon can (content unknown and not able to be determined), below pipes, underneath the dishwasher appeared to hold up one of the copper pipes. Observed a leak from underneath the handwashing station, which included a pool of discolored liquid directly underneath the sink drainpipe. Observed food debris and remnants and cracker wrappers on the floor in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-21 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to have a system in place that ensured grievances were addressed and resolved in response to residents' verbal conveyance of concerns for 1 of 1 Resident Council groups and 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident 27). The facility failed to track and investigate the concerns which led to residents repeatedly reporting the same care issues without resolution and placed them at risk of unidentified and unmet care needs, and diminished quality of life. Findings Included . Review of the undated facility policy titled Grievance Policy & Procedure, showed all grievance issues would be put into writing and brought to the Grievance Officer and would be addressed in an efficient manner. The administrator would contact the party initiating grievance to discuss and resolve any concerns. <RESIDENT COUNCIL> In an interview with Resident Council representatives on 07/16/2025 at 1:55PM: - * Resident 51 and Resident 47 stated the television (TV) noises, laughter and loud voices from staff at night was a continuous issue and was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-21 · tag F0582 — pattern
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide complete and updated Notification of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC - a document informing Medicare beneficiaries that their covered services will be terminated and providing information on their appeal rights) for 4 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 4, 15, 25 and 55) reviewed for liability notice. This failure placed residents and/or their representatives at risk for not fully understanding their Medicare benefits and appeal rights and receiving inadequate information to make appeal decisions. Findings included .Review of the facility policy titled, Notice of Medicare non-coverage Letter (NOMNC), revised date 12/27/2024, showed the facility had to make sure the resident and/or representative understood the purpose and the contents of the notice, the appeal process and the associated time frames so they could make an informed decision on whether to appeal.Review of Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) electronic web site (CMS.gov),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-21 · tag F0628 — pattern
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to issue a written notice of bed hold (holding or reserving a resident's bed while the resident was absent from the facility), provide a written notice to the resident and/or their representative and the ombudsman (independent and objective individual who investigates complaints against government agencies and other organizations) of a hospital transfer for 3 of 3 residents (Residents 14, 53 and 55) reviewed for hospitalization/discharge. These failures placed the residents at risk for lack of knowledge regarding their rights to a bed hold, monetary consequences, appeal rights, and available advocacy services, and possible unidentified or unmet care needs. Findings included .In a review of the facility policy titled Transfer or Discharge Notices, updated 07/13/2025, showed if a resident was transferred to the hospital a notice of transfer would be provided to the resident and representative as soon as practicable and a notice of facility bed hold and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-21 · tag F0644 — pattern
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that 4 of 6 residents (Resident 3, 8, 29 and 30) reviewed for the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASSR - a federally required screening of all individuals for Intellectual Disability (ID) or Related Condition and a Serious Mental Illness (SMI) prior to admission) process. The facility failed to refer the PASSRs for further review and failed to ensure any recommendations were incorporated into the plan of care. These failures placed residents at risk for unidentified mental health care needs, lack of mental health services and diminished quality of life.Findings included.Review of the facility policy titled, PASRR screening for Mental Disorder/Intellectual Disability, showed a positive Level I Screen (PASRR indicates that individual requires a PASRR Level ll Referral) necessitates an in-depth evaluation of the individual by the state-designated authority. PASRR Level ll which must be conducted prior to admission to a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-21 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure ongoing communication and collaboration with the hemodialysis (medical procedure that uses a machine to filter and clean the blood when the kidneys are failing) center and consistently complete resident's pre and post dialysis assessments for 2 of 2 resident (Residents 4 and 28) reviewed for hemodialysis (HD) services. The failure of inconsistent communication and collaboration between the facility and the dialysis center about what occurred during HD and the inconsistent completion of the pre, and post dialysis assessments placed the residents at risk for unidentified medical complications and other potential/negative health outcomes.Findings included .In a review of the facility policy titled, Dialysis (Renal), Pre- and Post-Care revised 02/2025 showed the policy included ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis facility regarding dialysis care and service.<RESIDENT 4> Resident 4 initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-21 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to provide appetizing and palatable food to 3 of 7 residents (Residents 1, 27 and 49) reviewed for food temperature and palatability. This failure placed residents at risk for weight loss, inadequate nutrition, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included .<RESIDENT 27> During an interview on 07/15/2025 at 11:18 AM, Resident 27 reported that the food was not served hot. During an observation and interview on 07/17/2025 at 8:50 AM, Resident 27 had just received their breakfast tray. Resident reported the biscuits and gravy tasted “OK.” Resident 27 stated the food would taste better if it was hot, but it was only warm. There was no heated plate warmer under the resident’s plate. The edge and the bottom of the plate were cool to the touch. During an interview on 07/18/2025 at 12:50 PM, Resident 27 was observed finishing their lunch meal. Resident 27 reported the food was just lukewarm, so they did not eat all of it. There was half of the main entrée left on their plate. Review of the July 2025 Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-21 · tag F0569 — isolated
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure funds were reimbursed to the resident and/or representative or the state Office of Financial Recovery (OFR) within 30 days of resident discharge or death for 1 of 4 (Resident 57) residents reviewed for trust accounts. This failure caused a delay in reconciling residents accounts within the 30 days requirement. Findings included .Resident 57 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. According to the nursing progress note, the resident passed away on 04/08/2025. In a record review of the facility's trust transaction history dated 07/15/2025, it was documented that Resident 57 had a balance of $378.67.In an interview on 07/18/2025 at 7:54 AM, Staff C, Business Office Manager, stated that any balances from resident's trust account must be returned to the resident within 30 days after discharge. If a resident passed away, then they were to submit the balance amount to the OFR. Reviewed Resident 57's trust transaction history with Staff C and they…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and/or implement individualized comprehensive care plans for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 27) reviewed for catheter use and 1 of 2 residents (Resident 8) reviewed for dementia care. Failure to develop and implement care plans that were individualized and accurately reflected resident care needs placed residents at risk of unmet care needs and potential negative outcomes.Findings included.Review of an undated facility policy, titled, Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Planning, documented a comprehensive care plan would be developed to meet the residents medical and nursing needs and the IDT (interdisciplinary team) would review and/or revise the care plan after each assessment.<RESIDENT 8> Resident 8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include unspecified dementia (memory impairment), anxiety disorder, and depression. Review of Resident 8’s Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-an assessment to determine…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-21 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure professional standards were met for 2 of 5 residents (Residents 3 and 30) reviewed for unnecessary medication review. The facility failed to recognize and ensure parameters were followed for blood pressure medication administration and bowel constipation protocol for the resident and failed to notify the medical provider when the resident's blood sugar levels were beyond the ordered parameters. These failures placed the residents at risk for adverse outcomes, medication errors, complications, and unmet needs. Findings included . Review of the undated facility policy titled Blood Sugar Parameters stated the facility was to notify the provider for any blood sugar levels below 70 or above 450. Review of the undated facility policy titled House Bowel Protocol stated that milk of magnesium (medication for constipation) was to be given to residents if they had no bowel movement in three days, to give a glycerin suppository (medication for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-21 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure respiratory care and services were provided in accordance with physician's orders and accepted professional standards of practice for 2 of 2 residents (Resident 49 and 6) reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to ensure continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP, a form of non-invasive ventilation therapy used to facilitate breathing) orders were active and in place, to include the prescribed pressure settings, checking, refilling, and cleaning of the humidifier reservoir, and identifying what solution was to be used in the humidifier. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure oxygen (O2) was being administered per physician's orders. These failures placed residents at risk for ineffective breathing, decreased oxygen levels, respiratory infection and other respiratory complications.Findings included.Reviewed of an undated facility policy titled, CPAP Monitoring and Management, documented that CPAP machine settings and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure staff were compliant with Infection Prevention and Control Guidelines and standards of practice for 1 of 4 residents (Resident 31) reviewed for transmission-based precautions (TBP), 1 of 4 residents (Resident 27) reviewed for bowel and bladder care, and 1 of 3 nurses (Staff F) reviewed for medication administration. The facility failed to ensure the staff were wearing appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) in accordance with recommended national standards, failed to ensure staff were compliant with appropriate hand hygiene practices during perineal care (process of cleaning genitals and anal area), and failed to ensure there was a barrier in place during medication administration. These failures placed all residents and staff at risk of potential infection. Findings include . Review of the facility policy titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP), revised 02/2025, stated EBP was utilized to prevent the spread of potential…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-07 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to honor the preferences of one of one resident (Resident 26) reviewed for Activities of Daily Living. Failure to provide staff to assist Resident 26 with recreational meal intake 7 days a week placed them at risk for decreased quality of life. Findings included . Resident 26 admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include a stroke affecting their ability to swallow and maintain adequate nutrition from oral intake. Review of current physician orders dated 04/19/2023, showed Resident 26 with an order for tube feeding (tube directly into the stomach) to meet 100% of their nutritional needs. Resident 26 had been assessed as being able to safely tolerate some oral intake daily with 1:1 (one to one staff to resident ratio) supervision related to their impaired swallowing. Review of the Speech Therapy Discharge Recommendations dated 06/21/2024 showed a recommendation to continue one recreational meal per day. Review of Resident 26's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed ensure a homelike dining environment was provided during one of one dining observations. Failure to ensure licensed nurses refrained from administration of medications during resident meals placed residents at risk for diminished dignity and decreased quality of life. Findings included . Definition: Reasonable Person Concept: a standard used to determine whether an individual's actions or responses align with what a hypothetical reasonable person would do under similar circumstances. It defines the behavior expected of an ordinary, prudent, and rational individual. Resident 5 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include dementia. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] showed the resident could not complete the interview questions related to cognition. The staff assessment for cognition showed the resident had memory impairment and impaired decision making. Review of the facility policy titled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-07 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure resident grievances were filed and addressed for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 11) reviewed for grievances. The failure to address and resolve resident grievances placed residents at risk for diminished dignity, unresolved missing property and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy on 08/02/2024 titled, Grievances, showed a grievance report would be initiated for all concerns, the resident would be communicated with, and an attempt was made to resolve the grievance within 5 days. There would be follow up with the resident or representative about the grievance to ascertain satisfaction with the resolution of the reported concern. Resident 11 re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was alert and oriented. Review of the record showed the resident had a recent prior stay 03/21/2024 through 05/16/2024. In an interview on 07/31/2024 at 11:05 AM, Resident 11 stated they ended up back in the hospital and readmitted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-07 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI - an assessment of a resident's needs, strengths, goals, and preferences, included thorough summaries of the Care Area Assessments, - a systematic process to interpret the triggered information from the Minimum Data Set assessment to assess the potential problem and determine if the area should be care planned), holistically analyzed the plan of care for 1 of 6 sampled residents (Resident 30) reviewed for comprehensive assessments. This failure placed the residents at risk of not having appropriate services provided based on their individualized needs. Findings included . Review of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual, dated October 2023, showed the RAI consists of three basic components: the Minimum Data Set (MDS - and assessment tool) assessment, the CAA process, and the RAI Utilization Guidelines (instructions for when and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care plan interventions were implemented for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 13) reviewed for accidents. This failure placed residents at risk for injury, and decreased quality of life. Findings included . Resident 13 readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include fall, high blood pressure, fracture of right upper leg. In an interview and observation on 07/31/2024 at 2:54 PM, Resident 13 stated they had fallen out of their bed around eight months ago. Resident 13 stated they had been asleep in their bed when they had moved the bed control and started to fall over to the right side and fell from their bed. During the observation a blue foam wedge was noted at the foot of Resident 13's bed. Review the incident report, dated 01/02/2024, showed that Resident 13 sustained a fall at 2:45 AM and was assisted back to bed after they refused to be sent to the hospital. The incident report showed Resident 13 voiced being…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to revise comprehensive care plans for 2 of fourteen sampled residents (Residents 3 and 20), reviewed for care plan revisions. The failure to revise care plans for dental services and discharge planning placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <RESIDENT 20> Resident 20 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include above the knee amputation of the right leg, diabetes mellitus Type 2 (a condition where the body has a problem regulating blood sugar), and high blood pressure. In an interview on 07/31/2024 at 3:23 PM, Resident 20 stated they had planned to move to the Assisted Living Facility (ALF) next door. Resident 20 stated they had sold some property and were now not able to move to the assisted living. Resident 20 stated they were trying to contact someone at Home and Community Services (HCS) to work it all out. Review of Resident 20's care plan initiated 08/09/2022 and revised…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-07 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure professional standards of practice were implemented for 2 of fourteen residents (Residents 21 and 26) reviewed. Failure to follow physician's orders for labs and medication parameters for Resident 21 and to follow Speech Language Pathologist (SLP) recommendations for Resident 26 placed the residents at risk for delay in treatment and potentially adverse outcomes. Findings included . <RESIDENT 26> Resident 26 admitted in 2023 and had diagnoses which included a stroke affecting their ability to swallow and maintain adequate nutrition from oral intake. Resident 26 had physician's order for a tube feeding (tube directly into the stomach) to meet 100% of their nutritional needs. Resident 26 had been assessed as being able to safely tolerate some oral intake daily with 1:1 (one to one staff to resident ratio) supervision related to their impaired swallowing. Review of the Speech Therapy Discharge Recommendations dated 06/21/2024 showed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide assistance with activities of daily living for 2 of 2 sampled dependent residents (Residents 26 and 30) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL's). Facility failure to provide residents, who were dependent on staff for assistance with hygiene including oral care and meal assistance placed residents at risk for diminished quality of life. <RESIDENT 30> Resident 30 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included fracture of the right upper leg. Review of Resident 30's Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment tool) dated 06/18/2024 showed they required supervision or touching assistance with eating and partial/moderate assistance to complete their oral hygiene. In an interview on 07/31/2024 at 10:54 AM Resident 30's representative, Collateral Contact 1(CC 1), stated the resident spent most of their time in bed. CC 1 stated Resident 30 was assisted by staff with their meals, had their natural teeth (which were barely…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice and received the necessary care and services to attain or maintain their highest practicable level of well-being for 2 of 5 residents (Resident 21 and 30) reviewed. The facility failed to ensure Resident 21's alternating air mattress was set at the labeled setting and Resident 30 received routine repositioning. These failures placed the residents at increased risk of unmet care needs and potential skin breakdown. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled Repositioning residents dated 08/2022 and revised 07/2024 showed it was the facility's policy to reposition residents for comfort and skin integrity. The policy identified repositioning was critical for a resident who was immobile or dependent upon staff for repositioning. The policy general guidelines included the following interventions: 1.A turning/repositioning program…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-07 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure annual Nurse Aide Certified (NAC) performance reviews were completed for 1 of 4 NAC's (Staff K) files reviewed who had been employed at the facility longer than one year. This failed practice had the potential to negatively affect the competency of these NACs and the quality of care provided to residents. Findings included . Staff K was hired on 07/06/2023. Review of Staff K's employee file showed there was no current employee evaluation done. There was no evidence the evaluator completed this evaluation nor if it was reviewed/discussed with Staff K. Review of the staff roster printed on 07/31/2024 on the first day of survey showed various hire dates for staff beginning on 06/12/1987 to 07/26/2024. In an interview on 08/06/2024 at 12:59 PM, Staff J, Staff Development Coordinator said they would be doing new performance evaluations, but everyone's start date was May 1st and they were all new employees. In an interview on 08/06/2024 at 2:48 PM, Staff B Director of Nursing Services said all staff completed new hire…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, and served under sanitary conditions in 1 of 1 facility kitchens, 1 of 1 snack/nourishment refrigerators and 2 of 3 halls observed. The failure to monitor and document safe kitchen refrigerator temperatures, label opened food/beverage items, discard expired food items in the kitchen and unit refrigerators, ensure dishwashing temperature were maintained at the proper temperature, and cover desserts during meal delivery. These failures placed all residents at risk for their food to be contaminated, development of food borne illnesses, and consuming spoiled food. Findings included . <KITCHEN REFRIGERATOR> On 07/31/2024 at 8:54 AM during the initial kitchen tour, observed an undated sandwich in a bag on the first shelving unit, a thickened dairy beverage that was opened and undated, three trays of condiments, a pitcher of lemonade with a use by date of 07/29/2024, a pitcher of iced tea prepared 7/23/2024 with no use by date in the refrigerator. There was a stack of temperature…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adherence to infection prevention and control practices. The facility failed to properly don (put on) and doff (take off) personal protective equipment (PPE) for 1 of 1 (Resident 23) reviewed for aerosol contact precautions related to Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19, an infectious disease-causing respiratory illness symptoms including cough, headache, dizziness, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, loss of taste or smell, and in severe cases difficulty breathing that could result in severe impairment or death) outbreak, and failed to cover clean linens during transport. The facility also failed to properly store oxygen (O2) tubing for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 3) reviewed for O2 therapy. These failures placed residents at risk for contracting infection and diminished quality of life. Findings included . In a review of the Facility Assessment, undated, showed the facility was prepared to manage the treatment of COVID-19 infection for their…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-07 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, and interview the facility failed to develop, implement and maintain an in-service training program to ensure 1 of 4 Nursing Assistant's (Staff K) reviewed for the required 12 hour of nurse aide training per year. The failure to ensure Nursing Assistants Certified (NACs) received 12 hours per year in-service training placed residents at risk for potential unmet care needs. Findings included . Review of the Facility Assessment, undated, showed the facility utilizes the following training topics during all staff in-services or department meetings at multiple times throughout the year: - Communication - effective communications for direct care staff with residents/family. Resident's rights and facility responsibilities - educate staff members on the rights of the resident and the responsibilities of a facility to properly care for its residents. - Abuse, neglect, and exploitation - educate staff on: (1) Activities that constitute abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident property; (2) Procedures for reporting incidents, of abuse, neglect,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2026-06-26 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 7 resident rooms (Rooms 107,108, 110, 302, 305, 306, and 307) measured at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple resident rooms and at least 100 square feet in single resident rooms. Failure to ensure residents reside in rooms which met the regulatory requirements for square footage, placed them at risk for living in a physical environment too small to meet their needs. Findings included .Square footage (sq ft):room [ROOM NUMBER] 142 sq ft,room [ROOM NUMBER] 143 sq ft,room [ROOM NUMBER] 143 sq ft,room [ROOM NUMBER] 154 sq ft,room [ROOM NUMBER] 154 sq ft,room [ROOM NUMBER] 154 sq ft,room [ROOM NUMBER] 153 sq ft.Review of the facilities census showed that rooms 107, 108, 110, 302, 305, 306 and 307 all had two beds in each room. In observations made on 06/22/2026, 06/23/2026, 06/24/2026, 06/25/2026 and 06/26/2026 the rooms 107, 108, 110, 302, 305, 306 and 307 had two beds for each room. In an interview on 06/26/2026 at 11:30 AM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2025-07-21 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 7 resident rooms (107,108, 110, 302, 305, 306, and 307) measured at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple resident rooms and at least 100 square feet in single resident rooms. Failure to ensure residents reside in rooms which met the regulatory requirements for square footage, placed them at risk for living in a physical environment too small to meet their needs. Findings included .Square footage (sq ft):room [ROOM NUMBER] 142 sq ft,room [ROOM NUMBER] 143 sq ft,room [ROOM NUMBER] 143 sq ft,room [ROOM NUMBER] 154 sq ft,room [ROOM NUMBER] 154 sq ft,room [ROOM NUMBER] 154 sq ft,room [ROOM NUMBER] 153 sq ft.Review of the facilities census showed that rooms 107, 108, 110, 302, 305, 306 and 307 all had two beds in each room. In observations made on 07/15/2025, 07/16/2025, 07/17/2025, 07/18/2025, and 07/21/2025 the rooms 107, 108, 110, 302, 305, 306 and 307 had two beds for each room. In an interview on 07/21/2025 at 11:04 AM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2024-08-07 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and record review, the facility failed to ensure 6 resident rooms (107,108, 302, 305, 306, and 307) measured at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple resident rooms and at least 100 square feet in single resident rooms. Failure to ensure residents reside in rooms which met the regulatory requirements for square footage, placed them at risk for living in a physical environment too small to meet their needs. Findings included . room [ROOM NUMBER] 142 Square Feet (Sq.Ft.) (2 beds) room [ROOM NUMBER] 154 Sq. Ft. (2 Beds) room [ROOM NUMBER] 154 Sq. Ft. (2 Beds) room [ROOM NUMBER] 153 Sq. Ft. (2 Beds) Review of the facilities census showed that Rooms107, 302, 305, and 307 all had two beds in each room. Surveyor's observations of residents residing in the affected rooms determined that neither health nor safety of the residents in these rooms was compromised due to the size of the rooms. This is a repeat citation from 10/16/2023. Refer to WAC 388-97-2440(1)

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$71,318 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $71,318 — penalty dated 2023-10-16

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE MANDELBAUM FAMILY — 18 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 53.1-1.1 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.6-0.6 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 53.9+0.1 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.5-0.5 vs chain
The other 17 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.1★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
SIMCHA AND JANET MANDELBAUM FAMILY TRUSTOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF—since 05/01/2024
THE BENTZION MANDELBAUM 2021 IRREVOCABLE GIFT TRUST NO. 2OrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF—since 05/01/2024
THE JANET MANDELBAUM 2021 IRREVOCABLE GIFT TRUST NO 2OrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF—since 05/01/2024
THE SIMCHA MANDELBAUM 2021 IRREVOCABLE GIFT TRUST NO. 2OrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF—since 05/01/2024
STOCK, SHMUELIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/01/2024
BALDWIN, JASONIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF—since 04/14/2025
HOBBS, BRENDANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF—since 06/02/2025
KULISEWA, KONDIIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF—since 09/16/2024
LEAL, REBECCAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF—since 10/18/2024
SCOVEL, MIKAELAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF—since 11/18/2024
SEKERAMAYI, FLOYDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF—since 04/01/2025
SINGBEIL, EMMAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF—since 09/20/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 25 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-11.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$180K
Related-party expense3% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 64%Medicare 6%Other / private 30%

This home reported $180K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$466per resident / day
operating cost
$14,176per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$418per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Washington Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Washington
$13,155/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,969/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,600/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-09-01 — CMS provider number 505463. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-06-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next