No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Centinela Skilled Nursing & Wellness Centre West

950 Flower Street, Inglewood, CA 90301 · For profit - Corporation · 59 certified beds · (310) 674-3216 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (310) 674-3216 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0607) — cited Apr 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (32) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Urgent care / clinic
501 E Hardy St · (310) 674-1611 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
501 E Hardy St Ste 130 · (310) 671-7636 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1035 South La Brea Ave.
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
311 E Arbor Vitae St · (310) 672-0773

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased14.4%10.2%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight0.0%4.0%5.4%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.5%0.8%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.1%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms9.3%7.3%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%1.6%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened6.3%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication0.5%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.4%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control11.1%10.2%21.2%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table4.7%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.4%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission28.2%23.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit2.5%11.2%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.212.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.001.571.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

33.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 95 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

33.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
52.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.83U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.33hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.41hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 52.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 68 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.83 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 95% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 42% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF33.4%CMS range 24.1–42.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.0%CMS range 7.1–13.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge52.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge45.6%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge51.5%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting97.6%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.2%CMS range 4.2–11.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.921.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.41
RN hours/ resident / day
1.22
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.38
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.01
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.31
RN hoursweekends
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 59 beds and averages 53.1 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.01 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.41 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.38 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.68 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.14 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.45 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

13
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-11-21)
11
at the previous standard inspection (2024-10-13)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure a clear container which contained turkey sandwich meat was dated and labeled in the delivery freezer.This deficient practice had the potential to result in foodborne illness and contamination for 34 out of 54 residents.Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview, of the initial kitchen tour, on 11/18/2025 at 8:25 a.m., with the Dietary Supervisor (DS), a clear Tupperware container with a green lid was observed to not have a label of the food contained nor a date label in the Delivery refrigerator. The DS stated the turkey sandwich meat was used for snacks and sandwiches for the residents of the facility. The DS stated food items in the refrigerator were required to have a label, and an open and use by date. The DS stated the risk of not labeling the container of the turkey sandwich meat could result in residents consuming expired/spoiled food.During a review of the facility's policy and procedures (P&P), titled Food Storage, dated 7/25/2019, the P&P indicated all food items were to be correctly labeled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain dignity for one of 15 sampled residents (Resident 49) when Resident 49 was observed with eyeglasses that had the left lens taped into the frames. This deficient practice did not respect Resident 49's right to a dignified existence and placed Resident 49 at risk for injury related to broken eyeglasses. Findings: During a review of Resident 49's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 49 was admitted on [DATE], and most recently readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 49's diagnoses included dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), history of falling, and cognitive communication deficit (trouble participating in conversations). During a review of Resident 49's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool), dated 10/31/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 49 had adequate vision with eyeglasses. The MDS indicated Resident 49 had moderate cognitive impairment (ability to think and reason). The MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews the facility failed to:1. Ensure call light device was placed within reach for one of 15 sampled residents (Resident 2).This deficient practice had the potential to result in a delay in or an inability for the residents to obtain necessary care and services. Findings:During a review of Resident 2's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 2's diagnoses included muscle weakness, major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), unspecified dorsalgia (a disorder characterized by back pain), and type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing) with foot ulcer (a small open sore or wound found on the foot). During a review of Resident 2's History and Physical (H&P), dated 6/18/2025, the H&P indicated Resident 2 had the capacity to understand and make decisions. A review of Resident 2's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool) was accurately completed for one of 15 sampled residents (Resident 48). This deficient practice resulted in the transmission of inaccurate data to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS, a federal agency that administers the Medicare and Medicaid programs) regarding Resident 1's health status. Findings: During a review of Resident 48's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 49 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], and most recently readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 48's diagnoses included major depressive disorder (MDD, a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest). During a review of Resident 48's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool), dated 9/14/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 48 did not have cognitive impairments (ability to think and reason). The MDS indicated Resident 48 required substantial to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure care plans were developed for two of 15 sampled residents (Residents 32 and 49). This deficient practice placed Residents 32 and 49 at risk for not receiving the necessary interventions for their diagnoses and/or health problems.Findings: 1a. During a review of Resident 32's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 32 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 32's diagnoses included generalized muscle weakness, abnormalities of gait (manner of walking) and mobility, and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). During a review of Resident 32's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool), dated 10/29/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 32 had moderate cognitive impairment (ability to think and reason). The MDS indicated Resident 32 used a walker and required set-up/clean-up assistance to eat. The MDS indicated Resident 32 had broken teeth. During a review of Resident 32's Fall Risk Evaluation, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1.Review, update, and/or revise the care plan to address supervision while smoking for two of five sampled residents (Residents 10 and 54). This deficient practice had the potential to result in injury to Residents 10 and 54 due to conflicting documentation and inadequate supervision while smoking. Findings:During a review of Resident 10's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 10's diagnoses included hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness or the inability to move on one side of the body, making it hard to perform everyday activities like eating or dressing) to right and left side, paraplegia (loss of movement and/or sensation, to some degree, of the legs), and muscle weakness (generalized). During a review of Resident 10's History and Physical (H&P), dated 9/19/2025, the H&P indicated Resident 10 had the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Failed to ensure blood glucose monitoring and insulin orders were clarified and continued after being readmitted from the hospital for one of five sampled residents (Resident 8).This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 8 having a hypoglycemic (low blood glucose) or hyperglycemic (high blood glucose) episode.Findings:During a review of Resident 8's face sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the face sheet indicated Resident 8 was originally admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included type 2 diabetes mellitus (a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), hypotension (low blood pressure) and dementia.During a review of Resident 8's history and physical (H&P) form, dated 11/4/2025, the H&P indicated Resident 8 did not have the capacity to understand and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an optometry (the practice or profession of examining the eyes for visual defects and prescribing corrective lenses) referral was made for one of one sampled residents (Resident 49). This deficient practice placed Resident 49 at risk of not receiving the necessary care and interventions needed to maintain his vision and quality of life.Findings: During a review of Resident 49's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 49 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], and most recently readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 49's diagnoses included dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), history of falling, and cognitive communication deficit (trouble participating in conversations). During a review of Resident 49's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool) dated 10/31/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 49 had adequate vision with glasses. The MDS indicated Resident 49 had moderate cognitive impairment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Failed to ensure oxygen was administered as ordered for one of five sampled residents (Resident 24).This deficient practice had the potential to result in oxygen toxicity for Resident 24.Findings:During a review of Resident 24's face sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the face sheet indicated Resident 24 was admitted [DATE] on with diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing), chronic respiratory failure (a condition that occurs when the lungs cannot get enough oxygen into the blood or eliminate enough carbon dioxide from the body), emphysema (a condition in which the air sacs of the lungs are damaged and enlarged, causing breathlessness) and pulmonary hypertension (high blood pressure that affects the arteries in the lungs and the right side of the heart).During a review of Resident 24's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Provide pharmaceutical services that met the needs one of five sampled residents (Resident 24). Resident 24's lidocaine patch was not removed at the scheduled time as ordered by the physician. This deficient practice had the potential for avoidable physical harm related to lidocaine patch not being removed on time or experiencing potential adverse drug reactions from medications being administered differently from how they were ordered. Findings:During a review of Resident 24's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 24's diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing), hypertensive heart disease with heart failure (long term high blood pressure caused the heart to weaken, making it unable to pump blood effectively), chronic pain syndrome (pain that lasts longer than three months). During a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 22 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interviews the facility failed to: 1. Ensure an unopened prefilled pen of Lantus (a long-lasting insulin [a hormone that removes excess sugar from the blood, can be produced by the body or given artificially via medication]) was stored inside the refrigerator per manufacturer's guidelines instead of storing inside Medication Cart Westback. This deficient practice had the potential to result in the deterioration and loss of effectiveness for insulin Lantus' improper storage and potential for ineffective management of the residents' diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing). Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/20/2025 at 12:35 p.m. with Registered Nurse (RN) 1 at medication cart westback, an unopened prefilled pen of Lantus was observed in the medication cart. RN 1 acknowledged that the insulin was stored in the cart unopened. RN 1 stated that all unopened insulin prefilled pens and vials should be stored in the refrigerator until they are opened. RN 1 stated once an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0847 — isolated
    Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the correct information was provided to one of three sampled residents (Resident 7) prior to asking him to enter into a binding arbitration agreement (the resolution of a dispute where both parties waive their right to a trial). This deficient practice resulted in Resident 7 unknowingly forfeiting his right to resolve any disputes with the facility in court, alongside a judge and/or jury.Findings: During a review of Resident 7's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 7 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 7's diagnoses included surgical aftercare for amputation of both legs below the knee and polyneuropathy (nerve damage). During a review of Resident 7's History and Physical (H&P), dated 9/25/2025, the H&P indicated Resident 7 had the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 7's record titled Arbitration Agreement, dated 9/25/2025, the record indicated Resident 7's daughter…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain infection control for all facility residents when: 1. Resident 48 was not tested for Covid-19 (an infectious disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus) after first exhibiting symptoms on 11/12/2025. 2. The facility failed to ensure there was warm running water in the handwashing sink located in the soiled laundry sorting area. These deficient practices created the potential for the transmission and spread of infection to all facility residents. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 48's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 49 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], and most recently readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 48's admitting diagnoses included sepsis (a life-threatening blood infection). During a review of Resident 48's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool), dated 9/14/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 48 did not have cognitive impairments (ability to think and reason). The MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two out of six sampled residents (Resident 27 and 24) were dressed appropriately. This deficient practice of the Residents 24 and 27 not wearing their own clothes had the potential to make the residents feel left out from socialization (activities that contributes to the integrity of an individual's health and wellness). Findings: a. During a review of Resident 27's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 27's diagnoses included hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body), chronic kidney disease (a condition where the kidneys do not work as well as they should), and aphasia (a disorder that makes it difficult to speak). During a review of Resident 27's History and Physical (H&P), dated 6/12/2024, the H&P indicated Resident 27 could make needs known but could not make medical decisions. During a review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-13 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one out six sampled residents (Resident 24) was offered his dentures before eating. This deficient practice of not offering Resident 24 his dentures while eating had the potential to not be able to chew food effectively. Findings: During a review of Resident 24's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 24 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 24's diagnoses included heart failure (a condition in which the heart does not pump blood as well as it should), dysphasia (difficulty swallowing), and aphasia (a disorder that makes it difficult to speak). During a review of Resident 24's History and Physical (H&P), dated 8/26/2024, the H&P indicated Resident 24 had fluctuating capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 24s Minimum Data Set ([MDS] a federally mandated assessment tool), dated 7/1/2024 the MDS indicated, Resident 24's cognition (ability to learn, reason,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-13 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one out of six sampled residents (Resident 27) had the appropriate call light device to call for assistance. This deficient practice of not having the appropriate call light device had the potential for Resident 27 to not get assistance in a timely manner. Findings: During a review of Resident 27's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 27's diagnoses included hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body), chronic kidney disease (a condition where the kidneys do not work as well as they should), and aphasia (a disorder that makes it difficult to speak). During a review of Resident 27's History and Physical (H&P), dated 6/12/2024, the H&P indicated Resident 27 could make needs known but could not make medical decisions. During a review of Resident 27's Minimum Data Set ([MDS] a federally mandated assessment tool),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-13 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to inform and provide the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) form 48 hours prior to the end of skilled nursing services for one of three sampled residents (Resident 205). This deficient practice had the potential to result in the resident not being able to exercise his right to file an appeal and unknowingly paying for non-covered care expenses. Findings: During a review of Resident 205's admission Record (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the admission Record indicated, Resident 205 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 205's diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ([COPD] a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing), alcoholic liver disease (damage to the liver and its function due to alcohol abuse), and diabetes mellitus ([DM] a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing). During a review of Resident 205's Minimum…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one out of six sampled residents (Resident 34) was provided a homelike environment and did not have chipped paint on the wall next to the resident's bed. This deficient practice of not providing a homelike environment for Resident 34 had the potential to negatively impact the resident quality of life. Findings: During a review of Resident 34's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 34 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and last readmitted [DATE]. Resident 34's diagnoses included aphasia (a disorder that makes it difficult to speak), chronic kidney disease (a condition where the kidneys do not work as well as they should), and atherosclerotic hearth disease (a chronic inflammatory disease that causes plaque buildup in the walls of arteries, narrowing them and restricting blood flow). During a review of Resident 34's History and Physical (H&P), dated 8/29/2024, the H&P indicated Resident 34 did…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one out of six sampled residents (Resident 2) had a care plan (a communication tool for patient care between nurses) for the refusal of dental services. This deficient practice of not having a care plan for refusal of dental services had the potential to place Resident 2 at risk for not receiving the appropriate interventions to prevent discomfort when eating. Findings: During a review of Resident 2's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 2's diagnoses included chronic kidney disease (damage to kidneys and can't filter blood the way they should), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and aortic aneurysm (a bulge in the wall of an artery). During a review of Resident 2's History and Physical (H&P), dated 7/22/2024, the H&P indicated Resident 2 had fluctuating capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 2s Minimum Data Set ([MDS] a federally…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, by failing to measure the abdominal girth (the measurement of the distance around the abdomen at a specific point, usually at the level of the belly button) weekly per the physician's order for one of one sampled resident (Resident 45) who had a diagnosis of ascites (a condition where fluid builds up in the abdomen). This deficient practice would put Resident 45 at risk for abdominal pain and shortness of breath possibly leading to medical complications requiring hospitalization. Findings: During a review of Resident 45's admission Record, the admission Record indicated, Resident 45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 45's diagnoses included ascites, chronic kidney disease (kidneys are damaged and can't filter blood they way they should), and psychosis (a severe mental condition in which thought, and emotions are so affected that contact is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the low air loss mattress ([LALM] a mattress designed to prevent and treat pressure ulcer (injuries to skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin) was set and maintained at the correct setting for one of three sampled residents (Resident 6). This deficient practice placed Resident 6 at risk for worsening of pressure ulcer/injury ([PU] localized, pressure-related damage to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence) and further skin breakdown. Findings: During a review of Resident 6's admission Record (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the admission Record indicated, Resident 6 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 6's diagnoses included PU Stage 3 (Full-thickness loss of skin. Dead and black tissue may be visible) on the sacral (large triangular bone at the base of the spine)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-13 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who received hemodialysis ([HD]) a treatment to cleanse the blood of wastes and extra fluids artificially through a machine when the kidney[s] have failed) treatment received care in accordance with standards of practice for one of two sampled residents (Resident 204) by failing to monitor and record the resident's daily fluid restriction (medical treatment that limits the amount of fluids a person can consume each day). This deficient practice placed Resident 204 at risk for swelling, discomfort, and shortness of breath. Findings: During a review of Resident 204's admission Record (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the admission Record indicated, Resident 204 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 204's diagnoses included end stage renal disease ([ESRD] irreversible kidney failure) and heart failure (a heart disorder which causes the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-13 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure a resident with a diagnosis of dementia was free from the use of antipsychotic medication (class of drug to treat mental illness) for one out of five sampled residents (Resident 49). This deficient practice had the potential to result in use of unnecessary psychotropic drugs (drug or other substance that affects how the brain works and causes changes in mood, awareness, thoughts, feelings, or behavior) for Resident 49. Findings: During a review of Resident 49's admission record (face sheet), the admission record indicated Resident 49 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 49's diagnoses included dementia (a decline in mental functioning, such as thinking, remembering, and reasoning, to the point that it interferes with daily life), urinary tract infection (a bacterial infection that occurs when bacteria enter the urinary tract and multiply), cerebral ischemia (a condition that occurs when there isn't enough blood flow to the brain)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-13 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure a dental services follow-up was completed for one of five sampled residents (Resident 17). This deficient practice had the potential to result in a decreased appetite and weight loss for Resident 17. Findings: During a review of Resident 17's admission record (face sheet), the admission record indicated Resident 17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 17's diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy (a brain disorder caused by a chemical imbalance in the blood that affects brain function), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), protein-calorie malnutrition (a nutritional status in which reduced availability of nutrients leads to changes in body composition and function), and iron deficiency (a condition where the body's total iron content decreases). During a review of Resident 17's Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS- a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 7/19/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 17 was cognitively intact…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive (complete; including all or nearly all elements or aspects of something) and patient-centered care plan for one out of four sampled residents (Resident 1) following allegations of financial abuse and Resident 1 missing $ 11,000. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 1 repeatedly being placed at risk for financial abuse. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hypertensive (high blood pressure) heart disease without heart failure, peripheral vascular disease (a reduced blood flow to a body part, other than the brain or heart, due to a narrowed or blocked blood vessel), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a lung disease causing restricted airflow and breathing problems). During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (Minimum Data Set [MDS] a standardized…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-24 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to: 1). Implement its policy and procedure (P&P) titled Theft and Loss, which indicated residents ' personal property will be safeguarded and when a resident ' s property was missing, the facility will investigate and document the incident on a theft and loss log. 2. Implement its P&P titled Abuse Prevention, Screening, and Training Program, which indicated misappropriation of resident property and financial abuse were the deliberate misplacement, exploitation, or wrongful use of a resident ' s belongings or money without the resident ' s consent. As a result, Resident 1 and other residents in the facility were placed at risk. Findings: A review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 1 ' s diagnoses included chronic kidney disease ([CKD], condition which the kidneys are damaged and cannot filter blood as well as they should), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, lung disease that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary food storage and food preparation practices in the kitchen were followed when: 1. Three bags of breaded potato hash browns were stored in the reach-in freezer with no date label. One large container of apple sauce was store in the reach-in refrigerator with no date. 2. Personal water bottles were stored in the facility two door reach-in refrigerator. 3. Nutritional supplement labeled store frozen, with manufactures instruction to use within 14 days of thawing, were not monitored for the date they were thawed to ensure expired shakes were discarded after this time frame. 30 strawberry flavored nutrition supplements were stored in the reach in refrigerator with no thaw date. This deficient practice had the potential to result in food borne illness (food poisoning caused by consuming contaminated food, beverages, or water) in 9 residents who are on nutrition supplements at the facility. 4. Juice machine tubing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-13 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage form (SNFABN, a document issued by medical providers to Medicare recipients, warning that services might not be covered; formally and legally transfers liability for payment of services to the Medicare recipient instead of Medicare) was completely filled out, by having one of three residents (Residents 256), chose one of the options for billing the anticipated non-covered inpatient skilled nursing facility (an in-patient rehabilitation and medical treatment center staffed with trained medical professionals) stay. This deficient practice had the potential to affect the skilled nursing services needed to progress and achieve the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial wellbeing of the affected resident (Resident 256). Findings: During a review of the admission record indicated Resident 256 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and an initial…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-13 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, a comprehensive assessment and care planning tool, regarding the pneumococcal vaccination (vaccine to prevent pneumococcal disease), was conducted for one of two sampled residents (Resident 3). This deficient practice had the potential for a poor care planning which can affect the health and safety of the affected resident (Resident 3). Findings: During a review of Resident 3's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 3 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis that included cerebral infarction (damage to tissues in the brain due to a loss of oxygen to the area), dysphagia (difficulty of swallowing), aphasia (loss of ability to understand or express speech, caused by brain damage) and dementia (the loss of thinking, remembering, and reasoning). During a review of Resident 3's Minimum Data Set (MDS), a comprehensive assessment and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy and procedure by ensuring one of one sampled resident (Resident 42), had a titration order (order to adjust flow of oxygen to achieve target oxygen level range in the system) for oxygen use, and ensuring the oxygen tubing was changed and labeled every seven days per policy. The deficient practice had the potential to cause respiratory complications and had the potential for facility acquired respiratory infections associated with oxygen therapy. Findings: During an observation on 10/10/2023 at 10:10 a.m., Resident 42 was receiving oxygen at two (2) liters per minute (LPM) via nasal cannula (a small flexible tube that has two open prongs that sit inside the nostrils used to deliver oxygen). The oxygen regulator (regulator that controls the flow of oxygen) was set at 2 LPM. During an observation on 10/12/2023 at 7:57 a.m. at Resident 42's room, Resident 42 was receiving oxygen at three (3) LPM via nasal cannula. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two insulin pens (a type of medication used to treat high blood sugar) requiring refrigeration were stored according to the manufacturer's requirements affecting Residents 10 and 21, in one of two inspected medication carts (West Back Medication Cart 1.) The deficient practices of failing to store medications per the manufacturers' requirements increased the risk that Residents 10 and 21 could have received medication that had become ineffective or toxic due to improper storage possibly leading to health complications resulting in hospitalization. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on [DATE] at 2:10 p.m. of the [NAME] Back Medication Cart 1 with the Licensed Vocational Nurse 1 ( LVN), the following medications were found either expired, stored in a manner contrary to their respective manufacturer's requirements, or not labeled with an open date, as required by their respective manufacturer's specifications: 1.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-13 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prepare food by methods that conserved flavor, texture, and appearance for one of one puree food test-tray. The texture of the pureed diet was sticky and gummy with glossy and shiny appearance. When tasted the food was sticky to palate and gums and difficult to swallow and the flavor was bland. This deficient practice had the potential to result in meal dissatisfaction, decreased intake and placed Four resident on the puree diet at risk for unplanned weight loss. Findings: During initial facility tour on 10/10/2023 at 9:00 a.m., complaints about the temperature and flavor of the food were identified. During an observation and interview in the kitchen on 10/10/2023 at 10:00 a.m., Cook1 was preparing the lunch menu. Cook1 said the lunch includes chicken, creamy pasta, and spinach. Cook1 was cooking the chicken in the oven, she had prepared the creamy sauce for the pasta and was steaming the spinach on the stove. Cook1 stated, once food is cooked will take a portion and will blend for the residents on the pureed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PACIFIC HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS — 15 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 5 of 51.9+3.1 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 52.1+1.9 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.1-0.1 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 53.5+1.5 vs chain
The other 14 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.9★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
PACIFIC HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS, INC.Organization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST97%since 11/20/2008
ROSENBLATT, JASONIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 11/20/2008
RECHNITZ, SHLOMOIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/20/2008
ROCKPORT ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/09/2025
MOBASSER, MOHSENIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/03/2012
PATEL, PARYUSIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
ERETZ CENTINELA NURSING LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 11/20/2008

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+6.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$998K
Related-party expense11% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 63%Medicare 36%Other / private 1%

This home reported $998K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$505per resident / day
operating cost
$15,366per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$538per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 056167. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-11-21, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next