No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Highland Park Skilled Nursing And Wellness Center

5125 Monte Vista St., Los Angeles, CA 90042 · For profit - Corporation · 59 certified beds · (323) 254-6125 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (323) 254-6125 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jul 2026
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jul 2026
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (55) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS
Urgent care / clinic
5428 N Figueroa St · (323) 256-3884 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
5634 N Figueroa St · (323) 254-2851 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
5200 Monte Vista St · (323) 344-0036 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased22.7%10.2%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.4%4.0%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms23.6%7.3%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%1.6%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened23.2%9.8%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication14.4%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers9.2%4.3%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control4.9%10.2%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table5.5%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine86.0%93.2%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission14.4%23.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit4.9%11.2%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.962.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.551.571.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

36.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 44 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

36.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
40.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.59U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.35hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.21hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 40.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 82 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.59 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 87% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 26% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF36.9%CMS range 25.3–50.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.7%CMS range 7.5–17.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge40.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge50.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge43.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified67.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge90.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.9%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.8%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.7%CMS range 4.9–11.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.771.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.30
RN hours/ resident / day
1.52
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.50
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.32
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.30
RN hoursweekends
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 59 beds and averages 53.7 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.32 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.30 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.50 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.84 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.52 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.29 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

16
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-12)
13
at the previous standard inspection (2025-02-13)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

55 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 45 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · D2026-07-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to prevent resident to resident physical altercation for two of sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2). This physical altercation led to Resident 1 sustaining mild injuries to his face. This deficient practice not only resulted in Resident 1 sustained mild injuries to his face but also potentially leads to emotion, psychosocial, physical distress, create negative impact to Resident 1's well-being and quality of life. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 1's diagnoses including but not limited to unspecified hydronephrosis ( a medical term used when a diagnostic test shows that one or both kidneys are swollen due to a backup of urine, but the doctor or radiologist hasn't yet identified the specific underlying cause or location of the blockage), essential hypertension (high blood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-24 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (1) of two (2) sampled residents (Resident 1) physician was informed when Resident 1 had a change of condition (COC - a sudden, clinically important deviation from a resident's baseline in physical, cognitive, behavioral, or functional domains) of upper extremities skin discoloration and swelling on 6/18/2026.This deficient practice has the potential to result in a delay in the necessary care and services for Resident 1.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was originally admitted on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] with the following but not limited to diagnoses of dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), and difficulty walking. During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool), dated 5/22/2026, the MDS indicated the resident is moderately impaired in cognitive (the ability to understand and make decisions) skills for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-24 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain clinical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices for one (1) of two (2) sampled residents (Resident 1) by failing to accurately document the resident's skin check form dated 6/18/2026 and 6/19/2026. This deficient practice had the potential to negatively impact on the delivery of services.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was originally admitted on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] with the following but not limited to diagnoses of dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), difficulty walking, and fracture (break of bone) of the long, middle portion of the forearm's medial bone (the bone on the pinkie side). During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool), dated 5/22/2026, the MDS indicated the resident is moderately impaired in cognitive (the ability to understand and make decisions)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services including procedures to ensure the accurate acquiring, administering of drugs and biologicals to meet the needs for two (2) of four (4) sampled residents (Resident 4 and 8) reviewed and observed for medication administration, in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) by failing to ensure:Resident 4's Amiodarone Hydrocholoride (HCL) (used to treat and prevent serious, life-threatening heart rhythm problems) was administered and failing to follow gastrostomy tube (g-tube, surgical procedure wherein a tube is inserted through the abdomen wall and into the stomach used for nutrition and medication administration) flush as indicated on the physician's orderResident 8's Percocet (used to treat moderate to severe pain) was given as indicated on the physician's order. This deficient practice had the potential to increase the risk of Residents 4 and 8 for their health condition to worsen resulting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-12 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure its medication error rate was less than five (5) percent (%). Three medication errors (the observed or identified preparation or administration of medication or biologicals which is not in accordance with the prescriber's order/manufacturer's specifications/accepted professional standards and principles) out of 25 opportunities (observed administered medications) for error which yielded a facility medication error rate of 50% for two (2) of four (4) sampled residents (Residents 4 and 8) observed for medication administration (med pass).Resident 4's Amiodarone Hydrocholoride (HCL) (used to treat and prevent serious, life-threatening heart rhythm problems) was administered and failing to follow gastrostomy tube (g-tube, surgical procedure wherein a tube is inserted through the abdomen wall and into the stomach used for nutrition and medication administration) flush as indicated on the physician's orderResident 8's Percocet (used to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow proper food storage handling practices and infection prevention in accordance with its policy and procedure (P&P) by failing to ensure:1. Dietary Aide 1 (DA 1) was wearing a hair cover (hair net- a protective, typically disposable, mesh or non-woven covering worn over the hair by food service workers to prevent contamination from loose hair and dandruff) while in the kitchen. 2. Two (2) dry food items (a bag of pasta and a bag of sugar) were sealed tightly after being opened.3. One (1) expired dry food items (a bag of grits) were discarded.4. Pots and pans were stored away from the trash can, in a clean and sanitary manner. These deficient practices had the potential to result in food contamination (food that is tainted, spoiled, or contains harmful substances-including microorganisms, chemicals, or foreign objects-that make it unsafe for eating), causing food borne illness (any illness resulting from eating contaminated/spoiled foods) in a population of 57 residents that consumed food by mouth.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-12 · tag F0813 — pattern
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all the food items brought into the facility by visitors for residents were labeled and dated with the resident's name as indicated in the facility's policy titled Food Brought in by Visitors,. This failure had potential for residents to receive and consume the food of another resident and/or not receive their food brought into the facility. Findings:During an observation on 3/9/2026 at 9:51 AM with Dietary Supervisor (DS) in the facility Activity Room, three (3) food containers not labeled with the resident's name were observed in the resident's refrigerator (refrigerator used only for personal food items [NAME] to the facility by family and/or friends). DS stated the 3 food containers did not have a resident's name labeled on the container. During a concurrent interview and record review on 3/9/2026 at 10:35 AM with DS, the facility policy titled Food Brought in by Visitors, dated 5/22/2025, was reviewed. The policy indicated food…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain an informed consent (is the act of agreeing to allow something to happen, or to do something, with a full understanding of all the relevant facts, including risks, and available alternatives) ) prior to administering psychotropic medications (substance that affects the brain and alters mood, perception, behavior, or consciousness) for two (2) of five (5) sampled residents (Resident 1 and 28) reviewed for unnecessary medications in accordance with the facility policy when:Resident 1 did not have an informed consent prior to the use of antidepressant (prescription drugs designed to alleviate the symptoms of depression and other mental health conditions).Resident 28 did not have an informed consent prior to the use of antipsychotic (medication used to treat psychosis [a serious mental disorder characterized by defective or lost contact with reality]) and antidepressant.This deficient practice had the potential for Residents 1 and 28 not to be able…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a comfortable, safe and homelike environment for one (1) of 20 sampled residents (Resident 28) by failing to ensure resident's room did not have crack and peeled off paints on the walls. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 28 to have increased level of discomfort which can impact the resident's quality of life. Findings:During a review of Resident 28's Facesheet (admission Record), the Facesheet indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following but not limited to diagnoses of heart failure, and obstructive and reflux uropathy (a blockage in the urinary tract preventing proper drainage, while reflux uropathy is the backward flow of urine toward the kidneys [organs that remove waste from the body via urine]). During a review of Resident 28's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool), dated 12/24/2025, the MDS indicated the resident is independent in cognitive (the ability…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest) behaviors for one (1) of 20 sampled residents (Resident 9), was monitored and documented as ordered while the resident is receiving Remeron (a medication used to treat depression). This failure had the potential for Resident 9 to receive an unnecessary psychotropic medication (the use of drugs that alter brain chemistry to treat mental health conditions by managing mood, thoughts, and behavior, that are inappropriate for a patient's condition, taken in excessive doses, or used to manage behaviors for staff convenience rather than treating a specific, documented diagnosis). Findings:During a review of Resident 9's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 9 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included depression, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 45 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR - a federal assessment requirement to help ensure that individuals who have a mental disorder or intellectual disabilities are placed in facilities that can provide the appropriate care) Level 1 Screening accurately for one of one sampled residents (Resident 2) reviewed for PASARR. This resulted in an inaccurate evaluation that Resident 2 did not require a Level 2 PASARR, with the potential for Resident 2 not to receive the appropriate level of care Findings:During a review of Resident 2's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 2 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), schizophrenia (a mental illness that is characterized by disturbances in thought) and epilepsy (a chronic brain disorder characterized by recurring, unprovoked seizures [a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop an individualized resident-centered care plan (a care plan that prioritizes the unique health needs and desired outcomes of the resident) for two (2) of 20 sampled residents (Residents 21 and 46) by failing to:Include resident centered interventions to address Resident 21's risk for fall. This deficient practice has the potential to increase Resident 21's risk for falls resulting in incidents of fall and injury. Reflect Resident 46's fluid restriction as indicated on the physician's order. This deficient practice has the potential for Resident 46's fluid restriction not to be followed, which could result in respiratory complications, cardiovascular strain and fluid overload. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 21's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following but not limited to diagnoses of difficulty walking, lack of coordination, and history of falls. During a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident 5) reviewed for hearing received proper treatment to improve hearing abilities by failing to follow up with Resident 55's authorization for audiogram (measures hearing sensitivity across different pitches and volume to detect hearing loss) and tympanogram (assess middle ear function [eardrum movement, fluid, pressures]) (non-invasive diagnostic tests used to evaluate ear health) after the resident's Ears, Nose and Throat (ENT) appointment on 1/21/2026. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 55 to have increased hearing loss.Findings: During a review of Resident 55 Facesheet (admission Record), the Facesheet indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following but not limited to diagnoses of hypertension (high blood pressure), history of falling, and difficulty in walking. During a review of Resident 55 Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide supervision for one (1) of 1 sampled resident (Resident 29) reviewed for smoking when Resident 29 was observed smoking by himself outside in the patio.This deficient practice has the potential for safety concerns and accidents for Resident 29. Findings: During a record review of Resident 29's Facesheet (Admissions Record), the Facesheet indicated the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] with the following but not limited to diagnoses of difficulty in walking, lack of coordination and osteoarthritis (a progressive disorder of the joints, caused by a gradual loss of cartilage). During a review of Resident 29's Minimum Data Set (a resident assessment tool), 1/15/2026, the MDS indicated the resident was moderately impaired in cognitive (the ability to understand and make decisions) skills for daily decision making. The MDS also indicated Resident 29 required partial/ moderate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the fluid restriction (a dietary change that limits the amount of liquid a person can consume in a day) as indicated on the physician order for one (1) of two (2) sampled residents (Resident 13), who were receiving dialysis (a treatment to cleanse the blood of wastes and extra fluids artificially through a machine when the kidney/s have failed) treatment. This deficient practice has the potential to cause fluid overload (a condition where there is too much fluid in the body which could result in swelling, particularly in the ankles and legs, shortness of breath and health complications) to Resident 13. Findings:During a review of Resident 13's Facesheet (admission Record), the Facesheet indicated the resident was originally admitted at the facility on 3/19/2024 and was readmitted on [DATE] with the following but not limited to diagnoses of End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD - the final, irreversible stage of kidney [they are vital for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (1) of four (4) sampled residents (Resident 4) reviewed and observed for medication administration was free from significant medication error (the identified preparation or administration of medication was not in accordance with the physician's order, which may have cause the resident discomfort or jeopardize health and safety) by failing to administer Resident 4's Amiodarone Hydrocholoride (HCL) (used to treat and prevent serious, life-threatening heart rhythm problems) as indicated on the physician order.This deficient practice placed Resident 4 at risk of not getting the full effect of the medication which can result in blood pressure and heart rhythm problems.Findings:1. During a review of Resident 4's Facesheet (admission Record; front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the Facesheet indicated that the resident was originally admitted on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe provision of pharmaceutical services as indicated in the facility policy by failing to refrigerate two unopened latanoprost eye drops (medication used to lower high pressure in the eye) in accordance with the facility policy. This deficient practice increases the risk of the residents receiving a medication that had become ineffective or toxic due to improper storage, possibly leading to health complications resulting in damage to the optic nerve (a bundle of over one million nerve fibers that transmits visual information from the retina to the brain, acting as the sole communication path for sight) and potential vision loss or blindness.Findings:During a medication cart observation and interview on 3/12/2026 at 7:54 AM with Licensed Vocational Nurse 1 (LVN 1), Resident 7 and 36's latanoprost eye drops were observed inside the medication cart. LVN 1 stated the eye drops should be stored in the refrigerator designated for medication storage until they are open in accordance with the manufacturer's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure one (1) of twenty (20) sampled residents (Resident 37) breathing treatment mask and tubing (deliver aerosolized medication directly to the lungs. It includes vinyl mask, medication cup and plastic tube), and respiratory set up bag was changed every seven days per facility's policy and procedure. This failure had the potential to cause respiratory tract (airways including lungs) infection which can lead to Resident 37's hospitalization. Findings: During a review of Resident 37's admission Record indicated Resident 37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a progressive lung disease that makes it difficult to breathe) , presence of cardiac (an electronic device that is implanted in the body to monitor heart rate and rhythm), paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (a type of irregular heart rhythm that starts and stops suddenly, with episodes lasting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to supervise, monitor and provide safety measures, leading to oversight of one (1) of two (2) sampled residents (Resident 1) who attempted to elope (leave the facility without the staff's knowledge and/or supervision) multiple times prior to eloping from the facility on 1/4/2026 in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure (P&P). This failure resulted in Resident 1 eloped from the facility on 1/4/2026 around 1:20 PM which placed the resident at risk for exposure to injury, serious harm, medical complications and/or death. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the diagnoses including but not limited to toxic encephalopathy (disease of the brain that alters brain function), depression (severe feelings on sadness and hopelessness), difficulty in walking, and lack of coordination. During a review of Resident 1's Change of Condition (COC, tool…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (1) of two (2) sampled residents (Resident 1) were free from unnecessary psychotropic drugs (any medication capable of affecting the mind, emotions, and behavior) as indicated in the facility's policy and procedure and care plan by failing to ensure Resident 1:1. Had a specific indication for the use of Ativan (a medication that treats anxiety { fear characterized by behavioral disturbances}).2. Was monitored for specific manifested behavior and side effects for the use of Ativan.This deficient practice had the potential to place Resident 1 at risk for significant adverse (harmful) consequences from the use of unnecessary psychotropic drug, which could result to impairment or decline in the residents' mental, physical condition, functional, and psychosocial statusFindings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE]. Resident 1's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled Resident (Resident 1) received treatment and care in accordance with facility's policies and procedures by failing to: 1. Call alternate transportation to ensure Resident 1 receive hemodialysis (HD-a treatment to cleanse the blood of wastes and extra fluids artificially through a machine when the kidney(s) have failed) treatment as ordered and as scheduled on 2/12/2025. 2. Transcribe the order for Resident 1 to be monitored for fluid overload (too much fluid in the body which can raise the blood pressure [BP-the pressure of blood on the walls of the arteries as the heart pumps blood around the body] and force the heart to work harder and can also make it hard to breathe) after missing the HD treatment on 2/12/2025. 3. Administer BP medications on 2/12/2025 as ordered by the physician. These failures resulted in Resident 1 missing scheduled HD treatment and transfer to General Acute Care Hospital (GACH) on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide an environment free of accident hazards for one of one sampled resident (Resident 1) by failing to ensure Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 2 did not leave medications at the bedside table. This deficient practice had the potential to result in accidental ingestion of the medications by other residents and cause complications from taking medications not prescribed for the residents. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated that the facility initially admitted the resident on 6/30/2021 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limited to end stage renal disease (ESRD-irreversible kidney failure), dependence on hemodialysis (HD-a treatment to cleanse the blood of wastes and extra fluids artificially through a machine when the kidney(s) have failed), hypertension (HTN-high blood pressure), atrial fibrillation (Afib-a condition where the upper chambers of the heart…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat two of two sampled residents (Resident 35 and 43) with respect and dignity in accordance with the facility policy by failing to ensure: 1. Certified Nursing Assistant 2 (CNA 2) sat and be at eye level while assisting Resident 35 during feeding. 2. Resident 43's urinary collection bag was covered with a privacy bag (specially designed fabric pouch that conceals and protects urinary drainage bags). This failure had the potential to negatively affect Resident 35 and 43's self-esteem which could result in problems with emotional, psychosocial, and mental well-being. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 35's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease (decreased mental function and loss of ability to do daily tasks including the inability to voice needs), adult failure to thrive (FTT- a decline caused by chronic diseases and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-13 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an accurate assessment of the Minimum Data Set (MDS -resident assessment tool) for two (2) of two sampled residents (Residents 42 and 49) by failing to reflect the following on the MDS: 1. Resident 42's diagnosis of anxiety (mental disorder that involves persistent and excessive worry that can interfere with daily activities). 2. Resident 49's diagnoses of anxiety and depression (mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest in life). This deficient practice had the potential for the facility to not develop and implement an individualized care plan (a document that outlines the facility's plan to provide personalized care to a resident that includes measurable objectives, interventions and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs), which could negatively affect Residents 42 and 49's overall well-being. Findings: 1. During a review Resident 42's admission Record, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary respiratory services for three (3) of 3 sampled residents (Residents 49 and 54) as indicated on the facility policy by failing to: 1.Administer two (2) liters (metric unit of capacity) per minute (LPM) of continuous (without interruption) oxygen therapy (administration of oxygen at concentrations greater than that in ambient air with the intent of treating or preventing the symptoms and manifestations of low oxygen) to Resident 49 as indicated in the physician's order. The facility also failed to label and date Resident 49's plastic respiratory equipment bag (a plastic bag that holds and transports respiratory equipment), which contained a nasal cannula (NC- a tube that provides oxygen through the nose) tubing. 2. Store Resident 21's nebulizer (a device used to administer medication in the form of a mist inhaled into the lungs) equipment in a bag. 3. Administer 2 to 3 LPM oxygen therapy to Resident 54 as indicated in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow proper food storage handling practices in accordance with its policy and procedure (P&P) by failing to ensure: 1. Food was labeled and stored in refrigerators, freezers and dry storage. 2. Proper sanitization of dishes by ensuring all dishes in the dishwasher were washed with a temperature of at least 120 degrees Fahrenheit (F) during use. These deficient practices have the potential to result in food borne illness (any sickness that is caused by the consumption of foods or beverages that are contaminated with certain infectious or noninfectious agents) in a population of 50 residents consuming food by mouth. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/10/2025 at 7:49 AM in the facility kitchen with the Dietary Services Supervisor (DSS), the following food items were observed: a. Refrigerated container of sausage labeled with a use by date of 2/8/2025 b. Refrigerated container of cheese frosting labeled with a use by date of 2/8/2025 c. Refrigerated container of turkey meat labeled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-13 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — pattern
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of three garbage container (dumpster) lids remained closed and were not overflowing with trash as indicated on the facility policy. This failure had the potential to result in the attraction and spread of vermin (animals that are believed to be harmful, or that carry diseases, e.g., rodent's parasitic worms or insects) that could potentially enter the facility and spread diseases to the residents. Findings: During an observation on 2/12/2025 at 10:27 AM in the facility's parking lot dumpster area, two dumpsters were observed with trash overflowing out of the top of both dumpsters, with lids opened due to overflowing trash. During an interview on 2/13/2025 at 1:32 PM with the Maintenance Supervisor (MS), MS stated per facility policy, boxes and trash should be compressed into the dumpsters to ensure the lids stay closed and trash should not be overflowing. MS stated the outside dumpster lids were supposed to be closed and clean to keep out flies and rodents. During a review of the facility's Policy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to update and revise the care plan for two (2) of 21 sampled residents (Resident 42 and Resident 33) as indicated on the facility policy when: 1. Resident 42's fall care plan was not updated and revised after Resident 42 had a fall with injury on 1/3/2025. 2. Resident 33's care plan was not revised to reflect the updated fluid restriction in accordance with the physician's order on 1/15/2025. This failure had the potential to negatively affect the provisions of care and services for Residents 33 and 42 and had the potential to place Resident 42 at risk for further falls. Findings: 1. During a review Resident 42's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of dementia (progressive brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills) with psychotic (mental health disorder which a person loses touch with reality) disturbance, lack of coordination, generalized…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to meet professional standards of quality in accordance with the facility's policy for one of 21 sampled residents (Resident 42) by: a. Failing to ensure an Interdisciplinary Team (IDT, group of healthcare professionals from diverse fields who work in a coordinated manner toward a common goal for the resident) meeting was conducted after Resident 42 had a fall with an injury. b. Failing to ensure a Post Fall Evaluation was done after Resident 42 had a fall with an injury. c. Failing to ensure neurological exam (neuro check, an assessment of the brain, spine or nerves done to evaluate the nervous system function for potential brain injury) was done after Resident 42 had a fall with an injury to the eyebrow. These deficient practices had the potential to result in further falls for Resident 42. Findings: During a review Resident 42's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident 43) who had an indwelling urinary catheter (Foley Catheter, tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine into a drainage bag) received appropriate care and services as indicated in the physician's orders, by failing to appropriately assess and document signs and symptoms of urinary tract infection (UTI, an infection in any part of the urinary system, the kidneys, bladder [organ that stores urine] or urethra [the tube through which urine leave the body]). This deficient practice resulted in delayed UTI identification and had the potential to lead to worsening infection and delayed treatment. Findings: During a review Resident 43's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 43 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses of malignant neoplasm (cancer growth of cells) of prostate (small gland below the bladder), benign prostatic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately monitor the fluid intake for one of one sampled resident (Resident 33) with fluid restrictions and on dialysis (a treatment to cleanse the blood of wastes and extra fluids artificially through a machine when the kidney(s) have failed) treatment in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure. This deficient practice had the potential to cause fluid overload (too much fluid in the body) or increase risk for dehydration (harmful reduction in the amount of water in the body). Findings: During a review of Resident 33's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included end stage renal disease (a permanent condition that occurs when the kidneys are no longer able to function and require dialysis or a kidney transplant to survive), type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM, persistently high levels of sugar in the blood)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services by not supervising medication administration when eight (8) medications were given and left on the nightstand for one (1) of 21 sampled residents (Resident 39). This deficient practice had the potential to result in medication errors and had the potential to harm Resident 39. This also had the potential for other residents to access the medications and in the event that the medications were ingested, could cause harm to the other residents. Findings: During a record review Resident 39's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of atherosclerosis (plaque buildup in the arteries) of the aorta (main artery in the body), chronic pulmonary edema (an abnormal accumulation of fluid in the lungs, making it hard to breathe), and psychosis (a mental disorder characterized by a disconnection from reality), and dementia (progressive brain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to act upon the facility's Pharmacy Consultant's recommendations during the Medication Regimen Review (MRR, a monthly thorough evaluation by the consulting pharmacist of a resident's medication regimen, with the goal of promoting positive outcomes and minimizing adverse consequences and potential risks associated with medication) to address the recommendation/ irregularities for the month of December 2024's MRR for one of five sampled residents (Resident 41) as indicated on the facility's MRR policy. This deficient practice had the potential to result in adverse medication outcome for potential unnecessary medications to Resident 41. Findings: During a review of Resident 41's admission Record, the admission record indicated Resident 41 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0813 — isolated
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the temperatures of the facility's one of one Activity Room Refrigerator, which contained resident food brought by family/visitor, was checked daily per facility policy. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 40 to experience food borne illness (any sickness that is caused by the consumption of foods or beverages that are contaminated with certain infectious or noninfectious agents). Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/10/2025 at 8:40 AM with the Dietary Services Supervisor, in the facility activity room, the resident refrigerator was observed. The refrigerator contained a plastic bag with a food container, labeled with Resident 40's room number and bed. DSS stated this food was brought in by Resident 40's family. During a concurrent interview and record review on 2/10/2025 at 8:45 AM with DSS, the facility's Policy & Procedure (P&P) titled, Refrigerator/Freezer Temperature Log- Refrigerator in Activity Room, revised 11/2014, which was also the log, was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-29 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident ' s physician/medical doctor when the resident was refusing more than 50% of his meal 3 consecutive times for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) on 10/4/2024 to 10/5/2024. This deficient practice had the potential to delay in the necessary care and services for Resident 1 and lead to severe malnutrition. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record indicated resident was admitted on [DATE] with the following diagnosis of protein-calorie malnutrition (lack of sufficient nutrients in the body), dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), Alzheimer ' s disease (a disease characterized by a progressive decline in mental abilities) and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing foods or liquids). During a review of Resident 1 ' s History and Physical (H&P), dated 10/4/2024, indicated resident has no mental capacity to make decisions for self. During a review of Resident 1 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS – a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to promote dignity and respect for two of three sampled residents (Resident 16 and 11) for the dignity care area by: 1. Ensuring Resident 16's urinary catheter bag (tube that drains urine from the bladder into a drainage bag) was covered with a dignity bag (a bag used to cover and hold the catheter drainage/collection bag, so it is not visible). 2. Failing to ensure facility staff did not stand above Resident 11's eye level while assisting the resident to eat. These deficient practices have the potential to affect Resident 16 and 11's self-esteem and self-worth and violates Resident 16 and 11's right to be treated with dignity. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 16's admission Record indicated Resident 16 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, disease that causes obstructed airflow from the lungs) with acute exacerbation (sudden worsening in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-29 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — pattern
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to ensure the resident's abilities in activities of daily living (ADLs) for two of two sampled residents (Resident 15 and 29) of advance daily living (ADLs) care area. 1. Facility failed to ensure Resident 15 was provided communication device with the resident's primary language and failed to ensure Resident 15 with limited range of motion (ROM - movement of the joints) receive appropriate positioning in bed. 2. Facility failed to ensure Resident 29 was provided a communication device (a visual aid with symbols, pictures, or words that users can point to or select to express their thoughts and needs) with the language that the resident was able to understand. This deficient practice prevented the resident from communicating with the staff and had a potential to delay receiving appropriate care/treatment the resident needed. Findings: 1. A review of the admission record indicated Resident 15 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of three sampled residents (Resident 16 and 36) were provided with a safe environment to prevent avoidable accidents and hazards for accidents care area. This deficient practice had the potential to place the residents at risk for falls, injuries, and delayed care. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 16's admission Record indicated Resident 16 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- disease that causes obstructed airflow from the lungs) with acute exacerbation (sudden worsening in airway function and respiratory symptoms), dependence on supplemental oxygen, anxiety disorder (persistent and excessive worry that interferes with daily activities), and difficulty in walking. A review of Resident 16's History and Physical (H&P, the initial clinical evaluation and examination of the resident) dated 3/26/2024, indicated Resident 16 had the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the storage, preparation and distribution of food was done under sanitary conditions for fifty-two (52) residents of the facility by: 1. Facility failed to ensure that conventional oven temperature knob indicates the temperature setting. 2. Facility failed to ensure that food items inside kitchen produce refrigerator and dry storage were labeled with a received date and/ or expiration date, and expired food items were discarded and not mixed with other non-expired foods. These deficient practices had the potential to result in pathogen (germ) exposure to residents and placed residents at risk for developing foodborne illness (food poisoning) with symptoms including upset stomach, stomach cramps, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and fever and can lead hospitalization. Findings: 1. During observation and interview with the Dietary Staff Supervisor (DSS) and [NAME] on 3/26/2024 at 8:31 AM, in the kitchen, DSS stated, we do not know the temperature of the oven, the knob has no settings printed on there. It was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-29 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its protocol for Antibiotic Stewardship to reduce inappropriate antibiotic (medication used to kill bacteria and to treat infections) use by not administering antibiotic drug if the McGeers (named Infection Screening Evaluation in facility's medical record, surveillance definitions of infections in Long-Term Care Facilities) criteria were not met for two (2) of three (3) sampled residents (Residents 16 and 35) for antibiotic care area. This deficient practice had the potential for the residents to develop antibiotic resistance (when bacteria, viruses, fungi, and parasites no longer respond to antimicrobial medicine and become ineffective making infections difficult or impossible to treat increasing the risk of disease spread, severe illness, disability, and death) and suffer adverse side effects from unnecessary or inappropriate antibiotic use. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 16's admission Record indicated Resident 16 was initially…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-29 · tag F0887 — pattern
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide education, offer, and/or document the updated Covid-19 (Coronavirus Disease 19, a respiratory viral infection that affects primarily the lungs and result in cough and difficulty breathing) for the year 2023-2024 vaccinations for 96 of 105 employees. This deficient practice placed the residents and staff at risk for possible Covid-19 infection due to missed vaccination dosage. Findings: A review of the undated Employee List and Vaccines, it did not indicate how many employees were offered, received, and/or declined the updated Covid-19 for the year 2023-2024 vaccine. The Employee List indicated 3 employees were exempt from the vaccination. A review of the Covid-19 Vaccination Employee Consent or Refused, dated 11/16/2023, 11/28/2023, and 11/29/2023, indicated 3 employees received the updated Covid-19 2023-2024 vaccination offsite (not at the facility). During an interview on 3/28/2024 at 10:18 AM with Certified Nursing Assistant 7 (CNA 7), CNA 7 stated CNA 7 the last covid vaccine offered (unable to recall when) by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-29 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the call light (a device used by patients to call for assistance from hospital staff) was within reach (an arm's length) of three of 13 sampled residents (Resident 5, Resident 27, and Resident 15). This deficient practice had the potential to result in delayed provision of services, delay in care and Residents 5, 27, and 15 not receiving assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). Findings: a. A review of Resident 5's admission Record indicated Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of difficulty of walking, lack of coordination, neuralgia (severe, sharp, often shock-like pain that follows the path of a nerve) and neuritis (inflammation of the nerves), and schizophrenia (a chronic and severe mental disorder that affects how a person thinks, feels, and behaves). A review of Resident 5's History and Physical (H&P, the initial clinical evaluation and examination of the resident), dated 11/6/2023,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-29 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the assessment entries on the Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment and care screening tool) related to eating was accurately documented to reflect the resident's ability to eat for one of one sampled resident (Resident 6) for the resident assessment care area. This deficient practice had the potential to negatively affect Resident 6's plan of care and delivery of necessary care and services. Findings: A review of Resident 6's admission Record indicated Resident 6 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included anorexia (lack of loss of appetite for food), legal blindness, and unspecified hearing loss. A review of Resident 6's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and care planning tool), dated 3/7/2024, indicated Resident 6 was assessed having severely impaired cognition (mental action or process of acquiring knowledge and understanding) for daily decision making…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-29 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the preadmission screening assessment (PASRR - Preadmission Screening and Resident Review - a federal requirement to ensure that every person entering a Medicaid Certified Nursing Facility [NF] receive a Level I screening and if necessary a Level II evaluation to ensure that their NF residence is appropriate and to identity what specialized services they may need) form was accurately completed for a resident who had a mental illness for one of three sampled residents (Resident 24) for PASRR care area. This deficient practice led to the resident not receiving the necessary and appropriate psychiatric level of treatment and evaluation in the facility. Findings: A review of the Resident 24's admission Record indicated Resident 24 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of schizophrenia (a chronic and severe mental disorder that affects how a person thinks, feels, and behaves), Type 2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-29 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to review and revise the care plan for one of 13 sampled residents (Resident 11) who has a history of seizures (epilepsy- abnormal electrical activity in the brain that happens quickly). This deficient practice had the potential to negatively affect the provision of care and services for Resident 11. Findings: A review of Resident 11's admission Record indicated Resident 11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (bleeding in the area between the brain and the thin tissues that cover and protect it), paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat), and epilepsy. A review of Resident 11's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and care planning tool), dated 1/10/2024, indicated Resident 11 was assessed having moderately impaired cognition (mental action or process of acquiring knowledge and understanding) for daily decision making and required substantial/maximal assistance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-29 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary respiratory care services for one (1) of 1 sampled resident (Resident 16) for respiratory care area by failing to: 1. Ensure Resident 16's nasal cannula (NC, device used to deliver supplemental oxygen placed directly on a resident's nostril) tubing was changed per facility's policy. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 16 to develop a respiratory infection. 2. Place visible oxygen signage by Resident 16's door/wall prior to entering the room. This deficient practice had the potential for harm to Resident 16 and other residents, in an event of a fire. Findings: A review of Resident 16's admission Record indicated Resident 16 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, disease that causes obstructed airflow from the lungs) with acute exacerbation (sudden worsening in airway function and respiratory symptoms),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-29 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (1) of six (6) sampled residents (Resident 40) receive all medications in accordance with the physician's order and facility's policy and procedure (P&P) when Resident 40 was observed in possession of three (3) clear red capsules on 3/28/2024. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 40 to have an overdose of the medication, which could result in harm. Findings: A review of Resident 40's admission Record indicated Resident 40 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses of hemiplegia (a condition caused by brain damage or spinal cord injury that leads to paralysis [loss of motor function in one or more muscles] on one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (also known as a stroke, damage to tissue in the brain due to loss of oxygen to the area) affecting the left non-dominant side, degenerative disease of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-29 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a shower chair used by residents was in good condition and free from stains. This deficient practice had the potential for the resident to feel uncomfortable during showers and affect the resident's quality of life. Findings: During an observation on 3/28/2024, at 10:06 AM, an unnamed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) pushed a white shower chair and placed it outside of room [ROOM NUMBER]. The shower chair seat had brown and yellowish stains and the plastic woven backrest was ripped and worn out. During a concurrent observation and interview with Registered Nurse Supervisor 1 (RNS 1), on 3/28/2024, at 10:10 AM, RNS 1 stated the brown marks on the shower chair seat were old stains. RNS 1 stated the shower chair look old and needed to be replaced. RNS 1 stated she would not want to sit on that shower chair if she was a resident in the facility. During an interview with the Maintenance Supervisor (MS) on 3/28/2024, at 10:15 AM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-20 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to revise the care plan for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident 1) to include bowel and bladder retraining assessment as indicated on the bowel and bladder screener (assessment of how the resident's bladder and bowel are working). This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 1 not to receive specific interventions to maximize control of the bowel and bladder function. Findings: A review of the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis that included history of falling, left hip fracture, and neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder (when a person lacks bladder control due to brain, spinal cord, or nerve problems). A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and care screening tool), dated 7/3/23, indicated Resident 1 had severely impaired cognition (mental action or process of acquiring knowledge and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-20 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a bowel and bladder retraining program (use of a timed schedule for voiding/bowel movement based on the resident's identified need and routine to maximize control of their bowel and bladder function as much as possible) and scheduled toileting program (use of a timed schedule for voiding/bowel movement to match the Resident's voiding/bowel habits. Appropriate Residents for this program are caregiver dependent, cognitively impaired and cannot gain control of their bowel and bladder function) were implemented for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) as indicated on the facility policy. This deficient practice had the potential to result in not restoring the resident ' s bowel and bladder function,development of urinary tract infection (UTI- an infection in any part of the urinary system, the kidneys, bladder, or urethra), and fall. Findings: A review of the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 12 of 22 resident's rooms (Rooms 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18) met the requirements of 80 square feet (sq. ft) for each resident in multiple resident bedrooms. This deficient practice had the potential to affect the residents' personal space, decrease freedom of mobility and could compromise the provision of care.Findings:During multiple observations of resident's rooms from 3/9/2026 to 3/12/2026, Rooms 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 14, 15, 16, 17, and 18 did not meet the minimum requirement of 80 sq. ft. per resident in multiple residents' rooms. During an observation on 3/9/2026 at 9:30 AM in room [ROOM NUMBER], Resident 29 was observed wheeling (moving around using the wheelchair) himself out of the resident's room safely. During an interview on 3/9/2026 at 10 AM in room [ROOM NUMBER], Resident 55 stated she has enough space in her room for herself and her belongings. During an interview with Resident 29 on 3/9/2026 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2025-02-26 · tag F0732 — pattern
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Daily Posted Nurse Staffing (Nurse Staffing Information- refers to the actual hours of work performed per patient day by a direct caregiver) for 2/14/2025 to 2/25/2025 were posted in accordance with the facility's policy titled Nursing Department - Staffing, Scheduling & Postings. This deficient practice had the potential for residents and visitors not to be accurately informed of the census and staffing for the facility. Findings: During an observation on 2/25/2025 at 1:24 PM by the bulletin board outside the Director of Nursing's (DON) office, the Census and Direct Care Service Hours Per Patient Day (DHPPD or Nurse Staffing Information) form that was posted was dated 2/12/2025 (8 days ago). No other DHPPD forms were observed posted on the bulletin board. During a concurrent interview and record review on 2/26/2025 at 4:30 PM with RN 1 (who was covering for the DON in her absence), the photo documentation of DHPPD dated 2/12/2025 that was posted on 2/25/2025 was reviewed. RN 1 confirmed that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 12 out of 22 resident rooms (Rooms 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 14, 15,16, 17, and 18) met the requirements of 80 square feet (sq. ft.) for each resident in multiple resident bedrooms. This deficient practice had the potential to affect the residents' personal space, decrease freedom of mobility and could compromise the provision of care. Findings: During an observation of the facility and resident's rooms from 2/10/2025 to 2/13/2025, Rooms 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 14, 15, 16, 17, and 18 did not meet the minimum requirement of 80 sq. ft. per resident in multiple residents' rooms. During an interview with Resident 11 on 2/11/2025, at 11:36 AM, Resident 11 stated was comfortable in his room and had enough space for his belongings and wheelchair. During an interview with Resident 28 on 2/12/2025, at 8:39 AM, Resident 28 stated was comfortable in his room and had enough space for himself and his belongings. During an observation on 2/11/2025 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2024-03-29 · tag F0732 — pattern
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy to post the nurse staffing information hours at the start of each shift. On 3/26/2024, the facility did not post the nurse staffing information for the current date and did not indicate the total number of projected hours and the actual hours of licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care per shift. This deficient practice had the potential to inaccurately reflect the actual nurses providing direct care to the residents. Findings: During a general observation at the nurse's station and interview on 3/26/2024 at 9:19 AM, Director of Staff Development (DSD) stated the Nurse Staffing Information posted was not updated, and last date the Nurse Staffing Information document posted was 3/24/26. DSD further stated, today's date is 3/26/2024. During a follow up interview, on 3/27/2024 at 2:20 PM, the DSD stated she was not quite sure of what the Nurse Staffing Information sheets format was required to post. DSD stated, the staffing sheet was created by the previous…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2024-03-29 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 12 out of 22 resident rooms (Rooms 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 14, 15, 16, 17, and 18) met the requirements of 80 square feet (sq. ft.) for each resident in multiple resident bedrooms. This deficient practice had the potential to affect the residents' personal space, decrease freedom of mobility and could compromise the provision of care. Findings: During an observation of the facility and resident's rooms from 3/26/2024 to3/29/2024, Rooms 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 14, 15, 16, 17, and 18 did not meet the minimum requirement of 80 sq. ft. per resident in multiple residents' rooms. During an interview with Resident 33 on 3/29/2024, at 9:50 AM, Resident 33 stated he was comfortable in his room and had enough space for his belongings and wheelchair. A review of the facility's Client Accommodation Analysis Form, dated 3/27/2024, the facility had several rooms that measured less than the required 80 square footages per resident in multiple…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PACIFIC HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS — 15 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 51.9+0.1 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.1+0.9 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 52.1-1.1 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.5+0.5 vs chain
The other 14 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.9★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
PACIFIC HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS, INC.Organization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST99%since 02/13/2008
BRIUS LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 02/15/2008
CORPORATE INTERFACE SERVICES LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/18/2024
ROCKPORT ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/15/2008
PANOSSIAN, AYUNAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/21/2021
RECHNITZ, SHLOMOIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/15/2008
VACA, ERICIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/03/2025
ERETZ HIGHLAND PARK PROPERTIES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/28/2020

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+4.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$668K
Related-party expense8% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 71%Medicare 22%Other / private 7%

About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $668K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$414per resident / day
operating cost
$12,594per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$433per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555165. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next