No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Osage Healthcare & Wellness Centre

1001 South Osage Ave, Inglewood, CA 90301 · For profit - Corporation · 53 certified beds · (310) 674-3216 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (310) 674-3216 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
No harm-level citations or fines — but 45 lower-level deficiencies on record (see below)
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (45) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Urgent care / clinic
501 E Hardy St · (310) 674-1611 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
501 E Hardy St Ste 130 · (310) 671-7636 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1035 South La Brea Ave.
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
311 E Arbor Vitae St · (310) 672-0773

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 5 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased11.0%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.6%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.5%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms11.3%7.3%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%1.6%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened4.3%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication9.9%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.1%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control4.3%10.2%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table8.0%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication6.7%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission29.2%23.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit1.0%11.2%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.072.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.081.571.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

34.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 53 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

34.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
54.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.63U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.30hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.22hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 54.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 51 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.63 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 89% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 42% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF34.0%CMS range 24.6–48.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.7%CMS range 7.1–16.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge54.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge52.9%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge47.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting91.8%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened5.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.0%CMS range 5.0–14.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.751.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.48
RN hours/ resident / day
1.38
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.55
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.41
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.44
RN hoursweekends
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 53 beds and averages 40.9 residents a day — about 77% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.41 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.48 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.55 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.29 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.47 on weekdays — 4% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.50 to 0.44 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

18
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-13)
13
at the previous standard inspection (2024-11-01)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

45 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 35 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Provide continuous supplemental oxygen (a medical treatment delivering oxygen enriched air to people with breathing problems) at two liters per minute (lpm, unit of measurement the rate of oxygen flow delivered to the resident) through nasal cannula (a small plastic tube, which fits into the person's nostrils for providing supplemental oxygen) as ordered by the physician for one of three sampled residents (Resident 2). 2. Ensure the oxygen tubing (a flexible, latex-free tubing, to deliver oxygen from a source) was labeled and dated for one of three sampled residents (Resident 22). 3. Implement the facility's policies and procedures to replace the filter of the BiPAP machine (Bilevel positive airway pressure - a breathing machine designed to increase air pressure, keeping the airway open when the person breathes in) every two weeks for one of two sampled residents. (Resident 30) These failures had the potential for Resident 2, Resident 30, and Resident 22 to experience respiratory distress (significant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure Resident food brought from outside was labeled, dated and stored in the designated resident's refrigerator in the activity room for one of one sampled resident (Resident 30). 2. Ensure 1 week old lettuce in a clear container was labeled and dated in the vegetable refrigerator in the kitchen. These deficient practices had the potential to result in harmful bacteria growth and cross contamination (transfer of harmful bacteria from one place to another) that could lead to foodborne illness (an infection or irritation of the gastrointestinal tract caused by eating or drinking food or beverages contaminated with harmful bacteria, viruses, parasites, or chemicals). Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 30's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 30 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 30's diagnoses included obstructive sleep apnea ([OSA] – a common, serious sleep…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-13 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to:1. Obtain a written informed consent (voluntary agreement to accept treatment and/or procedures after receiving education regarding the risks, benefits, and alternatives offered) from interdisciplinary team (([IDT] - team members from different disciplines who come together to discuss resident care) before initiation of a psychotropic drug (Any drug that affects brain activities associated with mental process and behavior) for resident with diagnosis of dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities) for one of six sampled residents (Resident 39).This deficient practice placed Resident 39 at risk for sustaining adverse effects (undesired effect of a drug) from psychotropic medication. Findings:During a review of Resident 39's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 39 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 39's diagnoses included dementia (a progressive state of decline in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-13 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1.Ensure that one of five residents, Resident 35, was provided a call device within their reach. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 35's inability to notify staff when in need of care or in distress.Findings: During a review of Resident 35's admission Record, dated 7/10/2025, the admission Record indicated that Resident 35 has Dementia (decline in memory, thinking, and reasoning) and Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), Lack of Coordination, and Generalized Muscle Weakness. During a review of Resident 35's History & Physical, dated 7/14/2025, the History & Physical indicated that Resident 35 does not have the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 35's Order Summary Report, dated 7/10/2025, the Order Summary Report indicated Resident 35's discharge potential as poor and that Resident 35 was ordered to receive skilled occupation therapy services (specialized services to improve, restore, or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-13 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Notify the physician for one of one sampled resident (Resident 30) refusing Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure ([BIPAP] - a noninvasive, mask-based ventilation device that assists with breathing by delivering two distinct levels of pressure) treatment.This failure had the potential for Resident 30 to experience severe shortness of breath that would likely require hospitalization.Findings:During a review of Resident 30's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 30 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 30's diagnoses included obstructive sleep apnea ([OSA] - a common, serious sleep disorder where breathing repeatedly stops and starts because throat muscles relax and block the airway during sleep), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ([COPD] - a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing), and heart failure (a heart disorder which causes the heart to not pump the blood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-13 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Inform a resident of how to file a grievance for missing glasses for one of four sampled residents (Resident 32). This deficient practice had the potential to violate the resident's right to have a grievance filed and ensure resident was comfortable at the facility. Findings: During a review of Resident 32's face sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the face sheet indicated Resident 32 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. The face sheet indicated Resident 32's diagnoses' list included glaucoma (an eye condition that damages the optic nerve), cataracts (a cloudy or foggy area that develops in the lens of the eye, which is normally clear), hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness, numbness, or reduced movement on one side of the body). During a review of Resident 32's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-13 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to: 1. Ensure one of two residents (Resident 2) Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR- a federal requirement to help ensure that individuals are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care) Level 1 screening (a mandatory preliminary screening required for all individuals seeking admission to a Medicaid-certified nursing facility) indicated diagnosed mental illnesses. This failure had the potential for Resident 2 not being appropriately identified for further evaluation of serious mental illness leading to resident not receiving necessary specialized services, treatment planning interventions, or appropriate placement.Findings: During a review of Resident 2's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated the facility admitted Resident 2 on 9/11/2019 and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder [a serious, long-term mental health condition that combines symptoms of schizophrenia…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a person-centered care plan for one of 17 sampled residents (Resident 30) by failing to: 1. Develop a comprehensive care plan addressing Resident 30's refusal to use Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure ([BIPAP] - a noninvasive, mask-based ventilation device that assists with breathing by delivering two distinct levels of pressure).This deficient practice had the potential to place Resident 30 at risk for delay of care and treatment.Findings:During a review of Resident 30's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 30 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 30's diagnoses included obstructive sleep apnea ([OSA] - a common, serious sleep disorder where breathing repeatedly stops and starts because throat muscles relax and block the airway during sleep), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ([COPD] - a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing), and heart failure (a heart…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-13 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure missing eyeglasses were replaced for one of four sampled residents (Resident 32). This deficient practice had the potential to violate the resident's right to have a grievance filed and ensure resident was comfortable at the facility. Findings: During a review of Resident 32's face sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the face sheet indicated Resident 32 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. The face sheet indicated Resident 32's diagnoses' list included glaucoma (an eye condition that damages the optic nerve), cataracts (a cloudy or foggy area that develops in the lens of the eye, which is normally clear), hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness, numbness, or reduced movement on one side of the body). During a review of Resident 32's care plan, dated 11/2024,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1.Ensure a Stage 4 pressure ulcer wound care treatment was provided for 4 days for one of four sampled residents (Resident 6). This deficient practice had the potential to result in further skin breakdown.Findings: During a review of Resident 6's face sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the face sheet indicated Resident 6 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 6's diagnoses included Stage 4 pressure ulcer (full-thickness skin and tissue loss with exposed muscle, tendon, ligament, cartilage, or bone) of the hip, paraplegia (loss of movement and/or sensation, to some degree, of the legs), peripheral vascular disease (PVD - a slow progressive narrowing of the blood flow to the arms and legs) and methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA - a bacteria that does not respond to antibiotics) carrier. During a review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 35 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure two of three residents' (Resident 2 and Resident 22) oxygen concentrator (machine that converts normal air to a more concentrated oxygen) was turned off when not in use. This failure had the potential to create an oxygen enriched environment, increased risk of fire hazards, equipment malfunction, and compromised resident safety.Findings:During a review of Resident 2's admission Record (Face Sheet). The Face Sheet indicated the facility admitted Resident 2 on 11/14/2019 with diagnoses including heart failure (a disorder which causes the heart to not pump the blood efficiently), history of cerebral infarction (stroke - loss of blood flow to a part of the brain due to blockage), and dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities). During a review of Resident 2's History and Physical (H&P) dated 9/18/2025, the H&P indicated Resident 2 did not have the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool) dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-13 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. ensure employee performance, competency validation, initial orientation validation, and orientation activities checklist were completed for 3 of 6 employees, RN1, LVN 2, and CNA 2. This failure had the potential to result in residents not receiving the required care based on the employee performance competency, orientation validation, and orientation activities provided for the proper care of the residents. Findings: During a review of the employee file of RN 1, the 2024 Annual Evaluation (yearly performance review) was not in the employee's file. During a review of the employee file for LVN 2, the Licensed Nurse Onboarding Activities Checklist (structured steps, training, and social interactions that integrate a new employee into an organization), dated 12/24/24, were missing validation of the following care requirements: Resident's Rights, admission Procedures, Discharge/Transfers, Psychotropics (medications to alter brain function, mood,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to: 1. Ensure one of one resident's (Resident 49) mouth was rinsed after administration of prescribed inhaler Breo Ellipta [an inhaler used as a maintenance medication for asthma (a condition that causes the respiratory airways to swell up, shrink, and fill with mucus)].This failure had the potential to result in Resident 49 developing irritation of the mouth, discomfort, and an increased risk of infection of the mouth and throat due to medication remaining in the mouth after inhaler use.Findings:During a review of Resident 49's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated the facility admitted Resident 49 on 10/9/2025 and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing), mild intermittent asthma with acute exacerbation (a sudden or worsening of shortness of breath, wheezing, cough, chest tightness leading to a decline in lung…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-13 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure medication error rate was less than five percent (%). Two errors out of 34 total opportunities contributed to an overall medication error rate of 5.88% for one of five residents (Resident 49) observed during medication administration (med pass).Resident 49's cholecalciferol (Vitamin D) 400 units [(IU - international units) a unit of measurement] tablet and fluticasone propionate suspension 50 mcg/act (micrograms per actuation- a unit of measurement) nasal spray were administered per physician's order. This failure had the potential to result in impaired bone health, increased fracture risk, respiratory complications, worsening allergy symptoms, nasal congestion and decreased comfort.Findings:During a review of Resident 49's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated the facility admitted Resident 49 on 10/9/2025 and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including fracture (broken bone) of left femur (the longest,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-13 · tag F0847 — isolated
    Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure a resident who had a diagnosis of dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities) and legally blind (severe vision loss) understands the legal documents (documents affecting the legal rights of any person) including Binding Arbitration Agreement (a binding agreement by the parties to submit to arbitration all of certain disputes which have arisen or may arise between them in respect of a defined legal relationship, whether contractual or not, the decision is final and can be enforced by a court, and can only be appealed on very narrow grounds) she signed during admission to the facility for one of three sampled residents (Resident 39). This deficient practice resulted for Resident 39 signing a facility contractual agreement without her full understanding.Findings: During a review of Resident 39's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 39 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to: 1. Ensure staff wore Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) when handling one of five resident's (Resident 21) gastrostomy tube (gtube - a surgical opening fitted with a device to allow feedings to be administered directly to the stomach common for people with swallowing problems) who was on enhance barrier precautions (EBP - is an approach of targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities).This failure had the potential to increase the risk of infection and cross-contamination (the transfer of bacteria, viruses, microorganisms, or other harmful substances from one surface to another through improper or unsanitary equipment, procedures, or products) among residents.Findings:During a review of Resident 21's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated the facility admitted Resident 21 on 7/2/2022 with diagnoses including hemiplegia (a medical condition characterized by paralysis or severe weakness on one entire side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness on one entire side of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-13 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. ensure that one of five residents, Resident 49, was provided COVID-19 and Influenza vaccines. This failure had the potential to place Resident 49 at risk of being infected with COVID-19 and Influenza viruses.Findings:During a review of Resident 49's admission Record, dated 1/28/2026, the admission Record indicated Resident 49 has Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary disease (a lung disease that makes it difficult to breathe) , mild intermittent asthma (a low-severity, lung condition characterized by infrequent coughing, wheezing, chest tightness) , and cognitive communication deficit (difficulty communicating due to underlying thinking disruptions rather than just language or speech problems). During a review of Resident 49's History & Physical, dated 1/29/2026, the History & Physical indicated Resident 49 does not have the capacity to understand and make decisions and Resident 49's potential for rehabilitation is fair to poor. During a review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-04 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record, the facility failed to ensure a Minimum Data Set ([MDS] - a resident assessment tool) assessment was completed accurately for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) by failing to: 1. Ensure Resident 1's hearing aid (a device worn in or behind the ear designed to amplify sound for individuals who have difficulty of hearing) was encoded and assess her hearing ability properly. This deficient practice had the potential to negatively affect the plan of care and delivery of care services for Resident 1.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated, Resident 1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 1's diagnoses included fracture of left femur (a break, crack, or crush injury in the bone of the left thigh), Parkinson's disease (a progressive disease of the nervous system marked by tremor, muscular rigidity, and slow, imprecise movements), and dysphagia (difficulty of swallowing). During a review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a person-centered care plan for one of one sampled resident (Resident 1) by failing to: 1. Develop a comprehensive care plan addressing Resident 1's missing right hearing aid. This deficient practice had the potential to result in a lack of meeting necessary care and addressing medical needs for Resident 1.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated, Resident 1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 1's diagnoses included fracture of left femur (a break, crack, or crush injury in the bone of the left thigh), Parkinson's disease (a progressive disease of the nervous system marked by tremor, muscular rigidity, and slow, imprecise movements), and dysphagia (difficulty of swallowing). During a review of Resident 1's History and Physical (H&P), dated 11/17/2025, the H&P indicated, Resident 1 did not have the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-04 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure audiology (branch of science and healthcare focused on the study, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of hearing, balance, and related auditory disorders in patients of all ages) consultation appointment was provided in a timely manner for one of one sampled resident (Resident 1). This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 1's deterioration of hearing that could negatively affect her quality of life.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated, Resident 1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 1's diagnoses included fracture of left femur (a break, crack, or crush injury in the bone of the left thigh), Parkinson's disease (a progressive disease of the nervous system marked by tremor, muscular rigidity, and slow, imprecise movements), and dysphagia (difficulty of swallowing). During a review of Resident 1's History and Physical (H&P), dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-04 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure an inventory of personal belongings was signed by resident or resident representative and facility staff and copy was provided for one of one sampled resident (Resident 1). This deficient practice had the potential for not having proper accountability of Resident 1's personal belongings.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated, Resident 1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 1's diagnoses included fracture of left femur (a break, crack, or crush injury in the bone of the left thigh), Parkinson's disease (a progressive disease of the nervous system marked by tremor, muscular rigidity, and slow, imprecise movements), and dysphagia (difficulty of swallowing). During a review of Resident 1's History and Physical (H&P), dated 11/17/2025, the H&P indicated, Resident 1 did not have the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure one of four sampled residents (Resident 4) was transferred from chair to bed using an appropriate technique.This deficient practice resulted in Resident 4 feeling discomfort when being transferred.Findings: During a review of Resident 4's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 4's diagnoses included paraplegia (loss of movement and/or sensation, to some degree, of the legs), muscle weakness, and contracture (a stiffening/shortening at any joint, that reduces the joint's range of motion). During a review of Resident 4's History and Physical (H&P), dated 8/14/2025, the H&P indicated Resident 4 was able to make needs known, but could not make medical decisions. During a review of Resident 4's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool), dated 8/18/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 4 had the ability to make himself understood and ability to understand others. Resident 4…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure one of four sampled employees (Certified Nursing Assistant 2) had an annual skills competency completed.This deficient practice had the potential to result in residents receiving a decreased quality of care.Findings:During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/27/2025 at 2:30 p.m. with the Director of Staff Development (DSD), Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 2's employee file was reviewed. The DSD stated CNA 2's new hire competency was completed on 2/21/2024. CNA 2 should have had an annual competency completed in February of 2025. The DSD stated the annual competency was not completed because she forgot. The annual competency is needed to ensure staff have up to date skills and check if retraining is needed. If staff don't know what they are doing it will affect the quality of the care the resident receives. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P), titled Staff Competency Validation, dated June 2024, the P&P indicated competency validation is completed to evaluate an individual's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure a sandwich for one of five sampled resident (Resident 40) was identified with a label and date. This deficient practice placed Resident 40 at risk for foodborne illness (any illness resulting from eating contaminated/spoiled foods). Findings: During review of Resident 40's admission Record (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), Resident 40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including anxiety (conditions that cause excessive and persistent feelings of fear or worry that can interfere with daily life), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing), and muscle weakness (loss of muscle strength) During a review of Resident 40's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 10/18/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 40's cognitive (the ability to think and process information)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-01 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure one out of three sampled residents, (Resident 26) call light was within reach. This deficient practice placed Resident 26 at risk for accidents and had the potential to delay in meeting Resident 26 physical and emotional needs. Findings: During an observation on 10/30/2024 at 10:29 a.m. Resident 26's call light was hanging on the side of the bed and not within reach. During a review of Resident 26's admission Record ([Face Sheet] front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 26 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary (COPD-a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing), diabetes mellitus (a chronic metabolic disease that causes high blood glucose levels), and gastro-esophageal reflux disease ([GERD] is a condition in which the stomach contents leak…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-01 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1.Inform the physician one of one sampled resident (Resident 38) refused to take trazodone (medication to treat depression). This deficient practice placed Resident 38 at risk for worsening of depression and withdrawal effect that could cause medical complications. Findings: During a review of Resident 38's admission Record (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the admission Record indicated, Resident 38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 38's admission diagnoses included major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), Diabetes Mellitus ([DM] - a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), and muscle weakness. During a review of Resident 38's History and Physical (H&P), dated 4/10/2024, the H&P indicated, Resident 38 had the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-01 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1.Ensure an accurate Minimum Data Set ([MDS] - a federally mandated resident assessment tool), was completed accurately for one of 13 sampled residents (Resident 9). This deficient practice resulted in incorrect data transmitted to Center for Medicare and Medicaid Cervices (CMS) and had the potential for a poor care planning which could affect the health and safety of Resident 9. Findings: During a review of Resident 9's admission Record (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the admission Record indicated, Resident 9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 9's diagnoses included End Stage Renal Disease ([ESRD] - irreversible kidney failure), muscle weakness congestive heart failure ([CHF] - a heart disorder which causes the heart to not pump the blood efficiently, sometimes resulting in leg swelling). During a review of Resident 9's History and Physical (H&P), dated 12/11/2023, the H&P…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one out of three sampled residents, (Resident 26) had a care plan to: 1. Monitor the frequency of outside food being brought in by family. 2. Monitor Resident 26's ability to tolerate regular textured (consists of normal, everyday foods textures that including hard, chewy, dry, and crunch foods) food brought in by family. These deficient practices resulted in failure to monitor Resident 26's prescribed pureed textured diet (a texture-modified diet that consists of foods that are ground, pressed, or strained until they have a smooth, soft consistency, like pudding) and had the potential to place Resident 26 at risk for choking. Findings: During an observation on 10/29/2024 at 10:15 a.m. in Resident 26's room, there was an empty box of a burger, large bag of potato chips, crackers, and cans of soda on the bedside table. During a review of Resident 26's admission Record ([Face Sheet] front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-01 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to: 1. Revise one of three sampled residents Resident 26) interventions identified by the multidisciplinary care team ([IDT] group of healthcare professionals from different disciplines) who was at risk of aspirating (inhalation of food or liquid into the lungs). The deficient practice had the potential for repeat occurrence. Findings: During a review of Resident 26's admission Record ([Face Sheet] front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 26 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 26's diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ([COPD] a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing), diabetes mellitus ([DM] a chronic metabolic disease that causes high blood glucose levels), and gastro-esophageal reflux disease ([GERD] a condition in which the stomach contents leak backward from the stomach into the esophagus).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-01 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to; 1. Ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident 16) who had a stage 4 pressure ulcer (localized, pressure-related damage to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence) was turned and reposition every two hours. This deficient practice had the potential to worsen and delay wound healing. Findings: During review of Resident 16's admission Record (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), Resident 16's was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including anxiety (conditions that cause excessive and persistent feelings of fear or worry that can interfere with daily life), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing), muscle weakness (loss of muscle strength), major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest) and schizoaffective disorder (a mental illness that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-01 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure resident with long thick elongated (nail plate grows linger than the nail bed) toenails received podiatry (profession dealing with the specialized care of the feet) care services for one of one sampled resident (Resident 36). This deficient practice had the potential to result in discomfort and decline in physical mobility for Resident 36. Findings: During a review of Resident 36's admission Record (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the admission Record, indicated Resident 36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 36's diagnoses included muscle weakness, iron deficiency anemia (a condition when your body does not have enough iron), and protein calorie malnutrition (a condition that occurs when someone doesn't consume enough protein, calories, and other nutrients). During a review of Resident 36's History and Physical (H&P), dated 10/6/2024, the H&P indicated,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to: 1. Ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 26) bed was placed in the lowest position to prevent injuries during a fall. This deficient practice had the potential in the resident falling from the bed and sustaining an injury. Findings: During a review of Resident 26's admission Record ([Face Sheet] front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 26 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and last readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 26's diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary (COPD-a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing), diabetes mellitus (a chronic metabolic disease that causes high blood glucose levels), and gastro-esophageal reflux disease ([GERD] is a condition in which the stomach contents leak backward from the stomach into the esophagus). During a review of Resident 26's History and Physical (H&P), dated 7/7/2024, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-01 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident 146) was provided with a scheduled toileting plan, per bowel and bladder assessment. This deficient practice had the potential for decline in bladder and bowel function for Resident 146. Finding: During a review of Resident 146's admission Record (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the admission Record indicated, Resident 146 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 136's diagnoses included muscle weakness, nondisplaced fracture of greater trochanter of left femur (a break in the top of the thigh bone near the hip), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ([COPD] - a chronic lung disease causing difficulty of breathing. During a review of Resident 146's History and Physical (H&P), dated 10/23/2024, the H&P indicated, Resident 146 did not have the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 146's Minimum Data Set…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-01 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure one of one sampled residents received hemodialysis ([HD] a treatment to cleanse the blood of wastes and extra fluids artificially through a machine when the kidney (s) have failed) treatment received care in accordance with standards of practice for one of two sampled residents (Resident 9) by failing to communicate to Resident 9's physician regarding Registered Dietitian ([RD] a health professional in nutrition) recommendation to provide Nova source ( a high calorie, nutritional supplement designed for those on dialysis) supplement. This deficient practice had the potential to result in weight loss and malnutrition that can lead to worsened health complication for Resident 9. Findings: During a review of Resident 9's admission Record (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the admission Record indicated, Resident 9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 9's diagnoses included End…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Label with an open date of ketorolac (a medication used to treat swelling and redness after eye surgery) and prednisolone acetate (a medication used to treat infection before and after eye surgery) ) ophthalmic solution (liquid eye drops) for Resident 34. This deficient practice had the potential for harm to Resident 34 due to the potential loss of strength of medication. 2. Label with an open date and remove one pouch of expired ipratropium with albuterol (a combination solution use to treat and prevent shortness of breath) inhalation solution for Resident 40. This deficient practice had the potential to result in prolonged use and loss of strength of the expired inhalation solution and can lead to ineffective treatment of respiratory symptoms for Resident 40. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 34's admission Record (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the admission Record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to: 1. Ensure one out of three sampled residents (Resident 26) nasal cannula (a medical device that provides supplemental oxygen to a patient through their nose) was dated and labeled. This deficient practice placed Resident 26 at risk for a respiratory infection (an infectious disease that affects the respiratory system, which is responsible for breathing). Findings: During an observation on 10/29/2024 at 10:15 a.m. and 10/30/2024 at 10:52 a.m. in Residents 26's room, Resident 26's nasal cannula was not dated and labeled. During a review of Resident 26's admission Record ([Face Sheet] front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 26 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 26's diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary (COPD-a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing), diabetes mellitus (a chronic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-03 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's clinical records were updated for advance directives (written statement of a person's wishes regarding medical treatment made to ensure those wishes are carried out should the person be unable to communicate them to a doctor) for one (1) out of 42 sampled residents (Resident 1) by failing to maintain a current signature and adequate dates that match dates on the copy of the resident's advance directives in the resident's clinical record. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 42 sampled residents advance directive was updated by failing to maintain a current signature and dates that matched the dates on the copy of the residents advance directives in the resident's clinical record. This deficient practice had the potential to result in conflict with the resident's wishes regarding health care (Resident 1). Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility with hemiplegia and hemiparesis (hemiplegia, a patient…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-03 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to revise the care plan for one of four Residents (Resident 39). This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 39 to receive inappropriate interventions and treatment. Findings: During a review of Resident 39s admission record facesheet, the face sheet indicated Resident 39 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic embolism and thrombosis (is a blockage or obstruction in the pulmonary arteries in the lungs), respiratory failure (a serious condition that makes it difficult to breathe on you own), left and right hand contractures (a fixed tightening of muscle, ligaments, or skin), chronic kidney disease (a condition in which the kidneys are damaged and cannot filter blood as well as they should). During a review of Resident 39's history and physical (H&P), dated 5/9/2023, the H&P indicated Resident 39 does not have the capacity to understand…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary food storage, food preparation practices in the kitchen by failing to: 1. Ensure one bag of breaded potato hash browns were not stored in the reach in freezer with no date and label and one large plastic wrapped bacon was open. 2. Ensure Dishwasher 1 (DW 1) knew how to use the proper sanitizer test strip for the dish machine sanitizer (competency - cross reference F802). 3. Ensure DW 1 did not take clean food trays out of the dishwasher and place them on the floor, then pick up the trays up and place the food trays that was on the floor in the rack with other clean trays. And ensure DAS did not place trays on top of clean dishes. 4. Ensure Employee's food was not stored in the resident food refrigerator without a label, date, and temperature log. These deficient practices had the potential to result in harmful bacteria growth and cross contamination (transfer of harmful bacteria from one place to another) that could lead to foodborne illness in 42 out of 42 residents who received food…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-03 · tag F0826 — isolated
    Provide specialized rehabilitative services by qualified personnel, when ordered for a resident by a doctor.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician orders to discontinue use of splints for one out of four Residents (Resident 39). This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 39 to receive the inappropriate medical treatment as ordered by the physician. Findings: During a review of Resident 39s admission record, the admission record indicated Resident 39 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic embolism and thrombosis (is a blockage or obstruction in the pulmonary arteries in the lungs), respiratory failure (a serious condition that makes it difficult to breathe on you own), left and right hand contractures (a fixed tightening of muscle, ligaments, or skin), chronic kidney disease (a condition in which the kidneys are damaged and cannot filter blood as well as they should). During a review of Resident 39's history and physical (H&P) dated 5/9/2023, the H&P indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-01 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 treat two of five sample residents (Resident 1 and Resident 5) with dignity and respect. These deficient practices violated the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and had the potential to affect the self-esteem, cause emotionally distress, and psychosocial well-being of the residents. Findings: a.During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission record, the admission record indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE], and re-admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis that included Parkinson disease (brain disorder that causes unintended or uncontrollable movements), obstructive and reflux uropathy (disorder characterized by blockage of the normal flow of contents of the urinary tract), and other specifies disorders of bladder (medical classification of a range -Other diseases of the urine). During a review of Resident 1 ' s history and physical (H&P) dated 5/12/2023, the H&P indicated Resident 1 had the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-01 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five sampled residents (Resident 2) with an indwelling catheter (a flexible plastic tube inserted into the bladder that remains there to provide continuous urinary drainage) received proper care and services as indicated in the physician orders by failing to: 1. Assess and document color and sediments (consistsof biological elements such as leukocytes, erythrocytes, epithelial cells, casts, bacteria, fungi, parasites) in Resident 2 ' s urine. 2. Notify the physician of color and sediments in Resident 2's urine output. This deficient practice resulted in delayed identification of Urinary Tract Infection [UTI- an infection in any part of the urinary system, the kidneys, bladder, or urethra)] delayed in necessary care and treatment and had the potential to lead to worsening infection. Findings: During a review of Resident 2 ' s admission record, the admission record indicated Resident 2 was admitted on [DATE] and re-admitted on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2026-02-13 · tag F0911 — pattern
    Ensure resident rooms hold no more than 4 residents; for new construction after November 28, 2016, rooms hold no more than 2 residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure two of 19 sampled resident rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER] and 18) accommodated no more than four residents per room. This deficient practice had the potential to result in and/or create safety hazards, lack of privacy, and care issues for the residents.Findings:During facility tour on 2/12/2026 at 8:31 a.m., it was observed in room [ROOM NUMBER] that there was space for the beds, side tables, and resident care equipment's and there were no concerns with privacy and safety issues to the residents, and room [ROOM NUMBER] has five empty beds. During an interview on 2/12/2026 at 8:35 a.m., with the Administrator (ADM), the ADM confirmed room [ROOM NUMBER] bed (A, B, C, D, E) and room [ROOM NUMBER] beds (A, B, C, D, E) accommodated five residents. During a review of the facility's letter, titled Request for Waiver/Variations to Section 483.70, dated 2/10/2026, completed and submitted by the ADM, indicated the facility is submitting a renewal variation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2024-11-01 · tag F0911 — pattern
    Ensure resident rooms hold no more than 4 residents; for new construction after November 28, 2016, rooms hold no more than 2 residents.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure two of 19 sampled resident rooms (rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]) accommodated no more than four residents per room. This deficient practice had the potential to result in and/or create safety hazards, lack of privacy, and care issues for the residents. Findings: During observations of rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] from 10/29/2024 through 11/1/2024, room [ROOM NUMBER] beds (B and c) and room [ROOM NUMBER] bed (D) were empty. There were no noted concerns with the privacy and care issues for the residents. During a review of the letter Client Accommodations Analysis completed by the facility on 10/29/2024, the form indicated room [ROOM NUMBER] beds (A, B, C, D, and E) and room [ROOM NUMBER] beds (A, B, C, D, and E) accommodated five residents. During a review of the Request for Waiver/Variance to Section 483.70 dated 10/29/2024, the Administrator requested a renewal for a variation of the above variance.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Waiver has been granted
  • No harm found · Bcited before2023-11-03 · tag F0911 — pattern
    Ensure resident rooms hold no more than 4 residents; for new construction after November 28, 2016, rooms hold no more than 2 residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that two of 12 sampled resident rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER] and 18) accommodated no more than four residents per room. This deficient practice had the potential to result in and or create safety hazards, lack of privacy and care issues for the residents. Findings: During observations of rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] from 10/31/2022 through 11/3/2023, there were no noted concerns with the privacy, care issues and or safety to the residents. During a review of the Client Accommodations ' Analysis form completed by the facility on 10/31/2023, the form indicated room [ROOM NUMBER] beds (A, B, C, D, and E) and room [ROOM NUMBER] beds (A, B, C, D, and E) accommodated five residents. During an interview with the Administrator (ADM), on 11/3/2023 at 9:20 a.m., the ADM stated the facility had a request for a waiver, that included two rooms to accommodate more than four residents. The facility's plan was to request another waiver for the current year…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Waiver has been granted

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PACIFIC HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS — 15 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 51.9+1.1 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.1+0.9 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.1-0.1 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.5+0.5 vs chain
The other 14 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.9★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
PACIFIC HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS, INC.Organization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST97%since 11/20/2008
ROSENBLATT, JASONIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 11/20/2008
RECHNITZ, SHLOMOIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/20/2008
ROCKPORT ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/09/2025
MOBASSER, MOHSENIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/03/2012
PATEL, PARYUSIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
ERETZ CENTINELA NURSING LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 11/20/2008

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-7.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$899K
Related-party expense11% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 77%Medicare 21%Other / private 2%

About 77% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $899K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$487per resident / day
operating cost
$14,804per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$454per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 056143. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next