No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Amaya Springs Health Care Center

8625 Lamar Street, Spring Valley, CA 91977 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 50 certified beds · (619) 461-3222 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (619) 461-3222 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0607) — cited Aug 2023Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0741)
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (33) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
7967 Broadway · (619) 741-9416 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
7920 Broadway · (619) 378-7758 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
8707 Troy St · (619) 724-8919 · Call to confirm hours
Park
8848 Troy St · (619) 464-5747 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
8758 Troy St · (619) 395-1254

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased5.5%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight17.9%4.0%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms11.2%7.3%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.8%1.6%3.3%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened11.3%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication9.0%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.5%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control15.4%10.2%21.2%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table8.8%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.5%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.7%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission19.8%23.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit14.5%11.2%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.182.251.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.171.571.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 75 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

46.3%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
38.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.75U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.37hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.34hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 38.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 60 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.75 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 93% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF46.3%CMS range 36.5–58.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.9%CMS range 7.8–17.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge38.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge31.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge33.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified88.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting92.5%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge96.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.7%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.5%CMS range 3.6–12.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.241.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.45
RN hours/ resident / day
1.36
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.48
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.29
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.36
RN hoursweekends
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 50 beds and averages 46.6 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.29 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.45 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.48 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.81 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.49 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.49 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

5
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-29)
6
at the previous standard inspection (2024-09-13)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

33 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-22 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan (detailed plan with information about a resident's treatment, goal, and interventions) related to a resident's nail care for one of two residents (Resident 2), reviewed for care plan. As a result, the lack of a resident centered care plan with specific interventions had the potential to result in delayed care, miscommunication among caregivers, and a decreased physical well-being of the residents. Cross Reference: F 677 Findings: Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included osteoarthritis (a degenerative joint disease) and needed assistance for personal care, per the facility's admission Record. A review of Resident 2's clinical record was conducted.According to the initial MDS dated [DATE], Resident 2 had a BIMS (ability to recall) score of 15/15 which indicated Resident 2's cognition was intact. The functional status indicated Resident 2 was dependent on a staff member for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-22 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide routine nail care to one of two residents (Resident 2), reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL, activities related to personal care/ hygiene) for dependent residents. As a result, Resident 2's toenails were long and curved and Resident 2 was at risk for skin injury and infection. Cross Reference: F 655 Findings: Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included osteoarthritis (a degenerative joint disease) and needed assistance for personal care, per the facility's admission Record. A review of Resident 2's clinical record was conducted.According to the initial MDS dated [DATE], Resident 2 had a BIMS (ability to recall) score of 15/15 which indicated Resident 2's cognition was intact. The functional status indicated Resident 2 was dependent on a staff member for personal hygiene. On 6/22/26 at 10:40 A.M., an observation and an interview were conducted of Resident 2 as he laid in bed. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications had proper storage and labeling when:1. An injectable medication (heparin, anticoagulant) comingled with oral medications.2. Discontinued medications of residents were not disposed of accordingly.3. A resident's medication was left at bedside (Resident 38). These failures had the potential for medications to be incorrectly administered, decrease medication potency (medication strength) that could compromise the therapeutic effectiveness of stored medications and prevent misappropriation of the medications. Findings: 1.A medication cart storage observation was conducted on [DATE] at 9:06 A.M. with Licensed Nurse (LN) 11. LN 11 opened the first drawer of the medication cart # 2 which contained over the counter (OTC) oral medications. A box of heparin injectable medications comingled with the oral OTC medications. LN 11 stated the injectable medications should not be included in the oral medications for safety and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide documentation to verify performance evaluation had been completed for two certified nursing assistants (CNAs).These failures had the potential to affect clients' well-being, should the staff be unable to perform duties effectively, efficiently, and competently.Findings: On 1/29/26 at 11 A.M., a concurrent review of the personnel files and interview was conducted with the Director of Staff Development (DSD). CNA 1 was hired on 10/29/18. The DSD could not find performance evaluations in CNA 1's personnel file. On 1/29/26 at 11:15 A.M., a concurrent review of personnel files and interview was conducted with the DSD. CNA 2 was hired on 9/17/24. The DSD could not find performance evaluation in CNA 2's personnel file.On 1/29/26 at 4:50 P.M., an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The Director of Nursing stated that staff should undergo performance evaluations annually to ensure they have the necessary skills to provide quality care and maintain compliance.On 1/29/26 at 4:55 P.M., an interview was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0741 — failed to have staff trained for behavioral health — isolated
    Ensure that the facility has sufficient staff members who possess the competencies and skills to meet the behavioral health needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's behavior was managed effectively, for one of one sampled resident (Resident 39). As a result, Resident 39's yelling and screaming was constant and disruptive to other residents.Findings: Resident 39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included brain disorders (progressive loss of structure and function of the brain as a consequence of progressive degeneration and/or death of nerve cells), per the facility's admission record. A review of Resident 39's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, cognitive assessment), dated 11/19/25, indicated a score of 9, which meant Resident 39 had a moderate cognitive impairment. A review of the psychiatric assessment dated [DATE], indicated diagnoses of depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), adjustment disorder (the reaction to a stressful change or event) and anxiety disorder (persistent and excessive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure infection control procedures were followed when a Licensed Nurse (LN)13 did not wear a gown for Resident 6 with enhanced barrier precautions (EBP - involves gown and glove use during high-contact resident care activities for residents [example: residents with medical devices]), while passing medication (med/s) during med pass observation. This failure had the potential for cross contamination and spread of infection.Findings: A review of Resident 6's admission Record indicated Resident 6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included urinary tract infections and with a gastrostomy tube (g-tube, a surgical opening fitted with a device to allow feedings/ meds to be administered directly to the stomach common for people with swallowing problems). On 1/28/26 at 8:26 A.M., an observation and an interview were conducted of LN 13 prepared medications for Resident 6. There was an EBP sign attached to Resident 6's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide influenza vaccines (prevents the seasonal flu, a contagious respiratory illness) and pneumococcal (an immunization protecting against streptococcus pneumoniae bacteria, which causes severe infections) for two of five residents (Resident 6 and 39), reviewed for vaccinations. As a result, Residents 6 and 39 were at risks of acquiring flu and pneumonia.Findings: 1.Resident 6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included Alzheimer's disease (a disease characterized by a progressive decline in mental abilities) per the admission Record. Resident 6's history and physical dated 11/1/25 indicated Resident 6's family member (FM) was the responsible party (RP) to sign consents for Resident 6. On 1/28/26 at 3:09 P.M., Resident 6's clinical record was reviewed for immunizations. There was no documented evidence the facility offered influenza vaccination to Resident 6 or the RP consented or declined to influenza vaccination for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-15 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's medical record were clear and complete when licensed nurses (LN) did not consistently sign the Medication Administration Record (MAR) when the tube feeding (TF) formula was administered, and a TF order did not have a rate (the speed of the TF delivered to the stomach) order for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 4). As a result, Resident 4's medical record was incomplete, which compromised the ability to track and verify the amount of TF formula administered. Findings: Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included gastrostomy ( a surgical procedure to create an opening in the abdomen and into the stomach to allow for the insertion of a feeding tube) status. A review of Resident 4's medical record was conducted on 4/15/25. Per the hospital discharge record dated 2/26/25, under Order Instructions for preparing TF formula, give one pouch for the formula to be warmed in a warm water bath, poured into a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to follow its animal policy and infection control protocols by allowing a cat to roam in and out of the facility unsupervised without documented flea and tick treatment, proper registration, or adherence to resident preferences. As a result, the facility failed to maintain a sanitary environment placing residents at risk of infection, allergic reactions, and environmental contamination. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of asthma (a chronic respiratory condition that causes inflammation and breathing difficulty) per the facility admission record. Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on 12.31/24 per the facility admission record. During an observation of the facility building and grounds on 1/28/25 at 2:25 PM a long black pole with a blue feather toy and a silver bell was seen propped up against the wall in the hallway of the facility outside administrative offices. A cat scratching post and a pet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to obtain a physician order to provide services in accordance with standards of care when admission orders for one resident, (Resident 1), did not include blood glucose monitoring (a process of regularly measuring the amount of sugar in the blood) before each meal and before bed. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 ' s blood glucose level to be undetected and untreated. Findings: On 10/17/24 the State Agency (SA) received a complaint that indicated Resident 1 ' s blood glucose was checked once per day and reached 477 (elevated above 70-99, a recommended range). Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus type two (a disease in which blood sugar is higher than normal and can cause permanent damage to the body). On 10/21/24 at 12:10 P.M. an unannounced visit was conducted at the facility. Resident 1 was discharged from the facility on 9/30/24. On 10/21/24 at 12:30 P.M. an interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 23 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a written notice of discharge to one of three sampled discharged residents (8). As a result, Resident 8 was not fully informed regarding his discharge. Findings: Per the facility's admission Record, Resident 8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include osteomyelitis (bone infection). On 9/12/24 a review was conducted of Resident 8's medical record. Per the facility's Progress Note, dated 9/4/24 at 12:42 P.M., Resident 8 was transferred to an acute care hospital for a change in condition and was awake at the time of transfer. There was no documentation on 9/4/24 that Resident 8 was provided with a Notice of Proposed Transfer and Discharge form prior to his transfer. On 9/12/24 at 3:26 P.M., an interview was conducted with Licensed Nurse (LN) 6. LN 6 stated, Resident 8 went to the hospital due to a change in his condition and was awake at the time of discharge. LN 6 further stated, he did not provide any paperwork to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a written notice of the facility's bed hold policy at the time of discharge to one of three sampled discharged residents (8). As a result, Resident 8 was not fully informed of his bed hold rights. Findings: Per the facility's admission Record, Resident 8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include osteomyelitis (bone infection). On 9/12/24 a review was conducted of Resident 8's medical record. Per the facility's Progress Note, dated 9/4/24 at 12:42 P.M., Resident 8 was transferred to an acute care hospital for a change in condition and was awake at the time of transfer. There was no documentation on 9/4/24 or 9/5/24 that Resident 8 was provided with a written notice of the facility's bed hold policy. Per the facility's Bed Hold Agreement, signed by Resident 8 on 1/17/24 (at the time of admission), the portion of the form titled, Notification of Bed Hold Option Upon Transfer/Therapeutic Leave was not completed. The form was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician of a resident's low blood sugar readings, and did not monitor fluid intake and output for two of 12 sampled residents (1, 29). As a result, Resident 1 did not receive treatment for low blood sugar, and the facility could not determine if Resident 29 had proper fluid intake and adequate output, which may have lead to the late detection of fluid abnormalities in the body. Findings: 1. Per the facility's admission Record, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include diabetes (disease of abnormal blood sugar). A record review was conducted. Per the facility's Orders, there was an order on 11/29/23 to check Resident 1's blood sugar before giving insulin (a medication to lower blood sugar), and to notify the physician if it was less than 70 milligrams (mg)/deciliter (dl). Per the facility's Weights and Vitals Summary, on 8/9/24 at 4:46 P.M., Resident 1's blood sugar reading was 13 mg/dl, and on 8/17/24 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that opened dressings in the refrigerator were labeled with an open date and that the freezer's foods were stored per the facility's policy and procedure. These failures placed residents at risk of acquiring foodborne illness and may have caused the texture of the food in the freezer to become less palatable. Findings: On 9/10/24 at 7:42 A.M., an initial tour of the kitchen was conducted with the Dietary Manager (DM). It was observed in the reach-in refrigerator that two large jars of dressings were opened, and there was no date. In addition, inside the reach-in freezer, there was a large sealable bag full of air, containing chicken thighs that had icicles built up on the meat. There was also an opened clear bag of diced chicken which was manually tied to close the item. On 9/10/24 at 8:07 A.M., an interview was conducted with the DM. The DM stated that opened items should be labeled and dated. Items in the freezer should have been stored appropriately. Per the facility's policy and procedure, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were followed when: (1) The nebulizer (a small machine that turns liquid medicine into a mist that gets inhaled into the lungs), mask, and cup (contains liquid medicine for the nebulizer) were not cleaned and bagged after each use, per the facility's policy, and (2) The water waste management program was not implemented. These deficient practices placed residents at risk for infections. Findings: 1. Resident 29 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Respiratory Failure (breathing problem), per the admission Record. On 9/11/24 at 10:09 A.M., Resident 29's nebulizer machine was observed on top of the dresser with a long clear tubing attached to the machine. The clear tubing was hung on the privacy curtain and down tuck inside the drawer. Inside the drawer were opaque-colored nebulizer cup and masks attached to the tubing. On 9/11/24 at 10:12 A.M., Resident 29 stated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0882 — isolated
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Infection Control Preventionist (ICP) completed the specialized infection and prevention training. This failure could result in the ICP not being knowledgeable or qualified to perform the duties to prevent the spread of infection. Findings: On 9/13/24 at 9:37 A.M., an interview and record review was conducted with the Infection Preventionist Nurse (IPN). The IPN stated she was helping with the infection control prevention program, and the designated IPN quit, leaving her to do the job. IPN further stated she did not have the chance to do the required specialized training. On 9/13/24 at 11:38 A.M., an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated the designated ICP should have had the required training. Per the facility's policy and procedure, dated 2/19/21, titled Infection Preventionist, .[The Infection Preventionist] Have education, training, expertise or certification in specialized infection control and prevention practices .

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-18 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to fully prepare three of four sampled residents, (1, 2, 4) for discharge in accordance with the facility discharge policy. Findings: A review of the facility policy entitled Discharge and Transfer of Residents revised February 2018 indicated, .When a resident is admitted to the Facility, Facility Staff will initiate a discharge plan. The resident/ resident representative will be provided with a Notice of Proposed Transfer and Discharge 30 days prior to discharge or as soon as practicable. When the resident is near a planned discharge, the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) will complete a Discharge Summary/ Post Discharge Plan of Care. Nursing Staff will complete a Discharge Summary/ Post Discharge Plan of Care for each resident, which will include a recapitulation of the resident ' s stay and final summary of the resident ' s status . 1. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included bilateral lower extremity lymphedema (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide supervised and assisted ambulation to one of one sampled Residents, (1), at high risk for falls. This failure resulted in Resident 1 experiencing an unwitnessed fall that resulted in a broken bone in her left ankle. Findings: Resident 1 ' s admission Record indicated admission to the facility on 5/5/22, and included diagnoses of paranoid schizophrenia (a pattern of thoughts, feelings and behaviors that include suspicion of others), generalized muscle weakness, essential hypertension (high blood pressure often requiring medication that can have side effects increasing risk for falls) and cognitive communication deficit (difficulty with thinking and communication). A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) section GG dated 11/11/23 indicated Resident 1 required supervision or touching assistance (assistance from one person) for toileting hygiene, lower body dressing, chair and bed to chair transfer, walking 10 feet or more. The MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide resident safety for 1 resident (Resident 1) when Resident 1 eloped (leaving the facility unsafely or unescorted) from the facility ' s exit door which was equipped with an audible alarm. As a result, Resident 1 had a successful elopement and there was the potential risk for the elopement of other residents. Findings: On 11/22/23 the Department of Public Health received a facility report of an elopement for Resident 1 on 11/22/23 at 4:30 A.M. During a review of Resident 1 ' s facility record on 11/22/23 at 7:05 A.M., the record indicated .around 4;30[sic] am resident up on wheelchair and verbally responsive, no c/o[sic] and any discomfort.at[sic] 5Am[sic] went to resident room and unable to find resident on her room checked the whole building. But resident nowhere to found and call 911 and informed resident is missing and gave description of resident . During a review of Resident 1 ' s facility record on 11/23/23 at 7:41 A.M., the record indicated, .Spoke to Sheriff .Deputy will give the facility a call…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-22 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their abuse policy when Resident 1 claimed an allegation of sexual abuse. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to not receive the appropriate follow up care. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], per the undated admission Record. A record review was conducted on 7/27/23. Per a Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) Basic interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score, dated 7/1/23, Resident 1 had mildly impaired cognition. Per an Alert Note, dated 7/26/23 at 11:42 A.M., Licensed Nurse (LN) 1 documented Resident 1 had reported being sexually assaulted the previous night. LN 1 documented she conducted an assessment and found no evidence of bruising, abrasions, or discoloration on Resident 1's skin. Per a Progress Note, dated 7/26/23 at 11:50 A.M., the Administrator (Admin) documented she had received a report that Resident 1 had been sexually assaulted by another resident. The Admin and LN 1 documented an interview with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-02-18 · tag F0887 — pattern
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to properly prevent COVID-19 (a respiratory infection) when three sampled residents (10, 13, 24) and six unsampled residents (161, 17, 31, 37, 42, 49) were not offered vaccines when they were due. Findings: On 2/16/22 at 2:40 P.M., an interview with resident 13's Responsible Party (RP 13) was conducted. RP 13 stated, My mom was in the Covid unit last week. She just moved to a regular room this week. RP 13 further stated, I was wondering why they didn't offer her the COVID-19 booster vaccine. On 2/17/22 at 9 A.M., a document titled, Respiratory Illness Case Log for Residents and Staff dated, 2/4/2022 was reviewed with the Infection Control Preventionist (ICP). The ICP stated, The resident's Covid tests and vaccinations have been recorded on the line list. Review of the list indicated: Resident 161 received 1st Covid vaccine on 2/3/21 the 2nd on 2/24/21, and the booster dose on 2/1/22. Resident 161's Covid-19 PCR test result was Positive on 2/1/22. Resident 10 received 1st Covid vaccine on 1/7/21, the 2nd on 2/4/21, and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-02-18 · tag F0576 — isolated
    Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not deliver mail to four of four Confidential Residents (CR 1, CR2, CR3, CR4) on Saturdays. This deficient practice did not ensure the resident's right to receive and send mail was met. Findings: On 02/16/22 at 10 A.M., the resident council meeting took place in the conference room. CR 2 stated, We haven't been getting mail on Saturdays for several months now. I would like to get my mail on Saturdays. CR 3 stated, I have never received mail on Saturdays. I would like to get mail on Saturday or Sunday. CR 1 stated, No, I've never gotten my mail on Saturday or Sunday. CR 4 stated, I would like to get mail on Saturday or Sunday. CR 1, 2, 3 and 4 all stated they did not get mail delivered to them on Saturdays. On 02/16/22 at 4:51 P.M., an interview was conducted with the MRD (Medical Records Director) and ICP (Infection Control Preventionist). The MRD stated, The Activities department was responsible for passing out mail. The ICP stated, If mail came in on Saturday, it should have been delivered to the residents the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-02-18 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to give a complete and accurate Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNOC) for one of three sampled residents (100) reviewed for beneficiary notification. As a result, Resident 100 did not receive adequate information to make an appeal. Findings: Resident 100 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included asthma (breathing problem) and hypertension (high blood pressure), and congestive heart failure (congestion in the heart) per the facility's admission Record and physician's history and physical. On 2/17/22, a record review was conducted of Resident 100. Resident 100 was discharged to an independent living facility on 9/4/21. The facility's form titled Notice of Medicare Provider Non-Coverage form contained blank lines under the sections, Date, Time, Spoke to, at:, Relationship to Patient, Signature, and Title. In addition, the facility's typewritten telephone number on the form was missing a digit making it impossible…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-02-18 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to safeguard and accurately identify a resident's medical record for one of 12 sampled residents (156). This failure had the potential for residents' private medical information to be visible to unauthorized persons. Findings: Resident 156 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Covid-19 (an infectious virus (corona virus) affecting respiratory system) per the physician's history and physical note. On 2/16/22 at 7:58 A.M., an observation was conducted of the facility's hallway. Next to a zippered plastic divider was an isolation cart. On top of the cart were two facility documents titled Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and one titled Bowel and Bladder Tracking form. The forms indicated a resident's name and room number, and their abilities to function with daily activities and bowel and bladder regimen. There was no staff present near the cart were documents were located. Resident 156 medical information was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-18 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for three of 12 residents (160, 102, 153). This deficient practice did not ensure provision of effective and person-centered care for these residents. Findings: A. Per the admission Record, Resident 0 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Urinary Tract Infection (an infection in any part of your urinary system ) and Schizoaffective Disorder, Bipolar type (a mental illness that can affect your thoughts, mood and behavior). On 2/16/22 at 9:30 A.M., Resident 160 was observed walking out of her room using a walker. As Resident 160 walked down the hall, Resident 160's pants were observed to have brown stains and brown substance on her ankle and in her shoe. Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 1 stated, She had a bowel movement, she has a brief on. On 2/18/22 at 10:45 AM, a joint interview and record review for Resident 160's clinical record was conducted with Licensed Nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for three of 12 sampled residents (160, 102, 153). Failure to develop a comprehensive care plan had the potential for residents to not receive accurate medical needs and appropriate treatment goals. Findings: A. Per the admission Record, Resident 160 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, Urinary Tract Infection (problem with urination) and Schizoaffective Disorder (mental problem), Bipolar type. On 2/16/22 at 9:30 A.M., Resident 160 was observed walking out of her room using a walker. As Resident 160 walked down the hall, Resident 160's pants were observed to have brown stains and brown substance on her ankle and in her shoe. Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 1 stated, She had a bowel movement, she has a brief on. On 2/18/22 at 10:45 A.M., a joint interview and record review was conducted with Licensed Nurse (LN) 1. LN 1 stated, When a new admission comes in, the Resident admission Assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-02-18 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an accurate and complete physician discharge summary on three of three sampled residents reviewed for closed records (52, 53, 54). Failure to keep a physician discharge summary had the potential for residents to not receive a safe transition between care settings. Findings: Resident's 52, 53, and 54's clinical record was reviewed on [DATE]. Resident 52 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included chronic obstructive respiratory disease (a lung disease) per the facility's admission Record. Resident 52 expired at the facility on [DATE]. Resident 53 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included kidney (body organ that produces urine) failure per the facility's admission Record. Resident 53 was discharged from the facility on [DATE]. Resident 54 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included diabetes (abnormal blood sugar in the body) per the facility's admission Record. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to safeguard a gated fence that led to the parking lot. As a result, Resident 152 eloped from the facility. Findings: Resident 152 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia (memory loss) per the facility's admission Record. An observation was conducted of the facility's smoking patio on 2/16/22. The patio had a gate and had an opened padlock. The gate was partially open which led to a small trail going to the facility's back parking lot. The gated fence had a laminated sign which indicated, This door must remain locked at all times. On 2/16/22 at 10:02 A.M., a joint interview was conducted with the MA (Maintenance Assistant) and HSK (Housekeeper). The MA and the HSK both stated the gate should always be locked so residents could not leave without being noticed. The MA acknowledged the gate's padlock was unlocked and did not know how long it had been open. On 2/16/22 at 10:06 A.M., an interview was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-02-18 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an oxygen nasal cannula (device used to deliver oxygen to a person) was changed on one of one sampled resident (154) reviewed for oxygen use. Failure to change an oxygen cannula had the potential for residents to be placed at risk for infection. Findings: Resident 154 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included oxygen dependent user and COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease - lung problem) per the facility's admission Record and physician's history and physical. During the tour of the facility on 2/15/22, Resident 154 was observed laying on her bed wearing an oxygen nasal cannula. The nasal cannula did not have a date when it was placed. Resident 154 was interviewed on 2/15/22 at 9:04 A.M. Resident 154 stated she could not remember when was the last time the nasal cannula was changed. Resident 154 stated they changed the nasal cannula, every month. On 2/15/22 at 9:15 A.M., a concurrent interviews was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-02-18 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have a system for receiving, reviewing and recording irregularities identified by the pharmacist during the MRR Medication Regimen Review). This deficient practice did not ensure the irregularities identified by the pharmacist was acted upon. Findings: On 2/18/22 at 10:30 A.M., a concurrent review of the MRR and interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) was conducted. The MRR binder contained the Pharmacist's report for December 2021. The binder did not have the MRR for January 2022. The DON stated, I just started reviewing the MRR from December 2021 and I haven't gotten to the January 2022 MRR yet. On 2/18/22 at 10:45 A.M., the December 2021 MRR was reviewed. The MRR indicated, Executive Summary of Consultant Pharmacist's medication Regimen Review .Data compiled on: 12/13/2021 for outcomes entered between 12/10/2021 and 12/13/2021 . These visits, 40 recommendations were forwarded to the following disciplines . 32 written to Nursing. On 2/18/22 at 10:51 A.M., an interview was conducted with the Pharmacy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure; 1. A medication cart was locked and, 2. A medication with an unknown expiration date was disposed of. Failure to lock a medication cart had the potential for drug diversion, and failure to dispose a medication with an unknown expiration date had the potential for all residents to receive an ineffective and expired medication. Findings: 1. A tour of the facility's red zone (Covid-19 zone- an area where people with infectious respiratory disease are placed) unit was conducted on [DATE]. Upon entrance to the red zone, there was a medication cart that was unlocked and unattended. On the first drawer of the medication cart were medication bubble packs with resident names. On [DATE] at 4:02 P.M., an interview was conducted with Licensed Nurse (LN) 15. LN 15 stated she should have locked the medication cart for safety reasons because they had ambulatory residents. 2. On [DATE] at 4:22 P.M., a joint observation of the treatment cart and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not maintain proper infection control practices based on current standards when a staff opened and walked through a barrier that separated a Covid-19 red zone (an area where people with infectious respiratory disease are placed) and a green zone (an area where there was no infection). This failure had the potential to spread infection throughout the facility affecting residents' quality of life and care. Findings: During the initial tour of the facility on 2/15/22, a staff was observed unzipping a taped plastic barrier from the Covid-19 red zone area. The staff proceeded to walk in the hallway of the green zone area carrying a ladder and a clear bag with an unknown material inside. On 2/15/22 at 3:35 P.M., an interview was conducted with Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 17. CNA 17 stated staff who came from the red zone should not unzip the barrier to go out in the green zone because they came from an infectious unit. On 2/15/22 at 3:39 P.M., an interview was conducted with the facility's Regional Consultants (RC1,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-02-18 · tag F0924 — isolated
    Put firmly secured handrails on each side of hallways.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the corridor had firmly secured handrails on each side. This deficient practice had the potential for harm to all residents. Findings: On 2/15/22 at 9:30 A.M., a loose hand rail next to the physical therapist's room was observed. On 2/16/22 at 11 A.M., Resident was observed in the hall near the kitchen. Resident 18 was observed using the handrail to propel along the hall while in his wheelchair. On 2/17/22 at 8:15 A.M., the Physical Therapy Assistant (PTA) was interviewed. The PTA stated, the hand rails are sometimes used by the residents to assist in standing. On 2/17/22 at 11:15 A.M., an interview was conducted with the Maintenance Assistant (MA). The MA acknowledged the loose rails They need to be fixed. On 2/17/22 8:25 A.M., an observation and interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON) and Administrator (ADM). The observations were discussed with the ADM and DON: The hand rail near room [ROOM NUMBER] was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PACIFIC HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS — 15 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 51.9+1.1 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 52.1+1.9 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 52.1-1.1 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.5+0.5 vs chain
The other 14 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.9★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
KATZ HEALTHCARE INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIPOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST5%since 11/10/2006
PACIFIC HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS, INC.Organization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST80%since 11/10/2006
RECHNITZ, SHLOMOIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/10/2006
ROCKPORT ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2006
BRUCE, TREVORIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/29/2023
JALIL, ANMARIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/27/2021
ERETZ BE PROPERTIES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/04/2008

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-14.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.0M
Related-party expense12% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 65%Medicare 18%Other / private 17%

This home reported $1.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$511per resident / day
operating cost
$15,548per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$448per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 056062. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-29, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next