Maywood Skilled Nursing & Wellness Centre
6025 Pine Ave, Maywood, CA 90270 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 133 certified beds · (323) 560-0720 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (50) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $19,892 in federal fines (most recent 2026-07-01)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 25.6% | 10.2% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 7.3% | 4.0% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.2% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.3% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 97.9% | 7.3% | 6.5% | check this† — see note marked dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.3% | 1.6% | 3.3% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 19.3% | 9.8% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 9.0% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.9% | 4.3% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 6.5% | 10.2% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 29.0% | 12.0% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 8.1% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 6.5% | 23.0% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 0.4% | 11.2% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 3.65 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.15 | 1.57 | 1.80 | better |
† This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
25.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 100 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 30.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 205 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.75 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 93% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 36% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 25.1%CMS range 16.3–33.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 7.8%CMS range 5.7–9.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 30.2% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 28.3% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 24.9% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 58.8% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 95.1% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.4%CMS range 4.5–9.5 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 2.00 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 133 beds and averages 120.5 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.05 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.61 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.34 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.66 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.22 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.62 to 0.58 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
50 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 37 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-08-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a care plan titled, At Risk/Potential for Aspiration (breathing in a foreign object such as sucking food into the airway) and Choking for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). According to the care plan interventions, staff will allow enough time for Resident 1 to eat meals, staff should instruct resident to chin tuck (tilt chin down when swallowing to prevent choking), swallow after each bite, swallow to clear throat, and alternate liquid (drinking fluids) and solid. On 8/6/2023, Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 1 gave Resident 1 a tamale without following Resident 1's care plan interventions which indicated to instruct resident to chin tuck, swallow after each bite, swallow to clear throat, and alternate liquid and solid. As a result of not implementing the care plan, Resident 1 choked on the tamale and was pronounced dead on 8/6/2023 at 3:28 p.m. On 8/10/2023 at 5:45 p.m., the Assistant Administrator (AADM) and the Director of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2023-08-11 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolatedProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) received immediate basic life support ([BLS] care healthcare professionals provide to anyone who's heart stops beating suddenly), including cardiopulmonary resuscitation ([CPR] an emergency procedure to restart a person's heart and breathing after one or both suddenly stop), when the resident became unresponsive. On [DATE], Resident 1 came out of her room in her wheelchair choking and to seek help. Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 1) performed the Heimlich maneuver (a method for forcing an object out the airway of a choking person) and Resident 1 became unresponsive. LVN 1 put Resident 1 into her wheelchair and wheeled the resident into her room and placed the resident on the bed before starting CPR. As a result, Resident 1 received delay in receiving CPR and Resident 1 was pronounced dead on [DATE], at 3:38 p.m. These deficient practices had the potential to affect other residents in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-07-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe transfer of one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 did not use a Hoyer lift (mechanical device used to safely lift and transfer non-weight bearing residents) to transfer Resident 1 from the shower chair to the bed. This deficient practice resulted in the unsafe transfer of Resident 1 and a displaced left femur fracture (a complete break in left thigh bone resulting in bone shift out of normal alignment). Resident 1 was transferred to the general acute care hospital (GACH) for evaluation and treatment and underwent an open reduction and internal fixation procedure (surgery performed to repair severe, displaced bone fractures).Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 1's diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a chronic lung disease causing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the fall risk care plan included interventions for two-persons assist (method where two staff members move a resident who cannot bear weight or stand independently) and the use of a Hoyer lift (mechanical device used to safely lift and transfer non-weight bearing residents) with transfers for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) . This deficient practice had the potential to place Resident 1's safety at risk.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 1's diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing), schizophrenia (a mental illness that is characterized by disturbances in thought), and dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities). During a review of Resident 1's History and Physical (H&P) dated 1/10/2026, the H&P…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-26 · tag F0575 — patternPost a list of names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups and a statement that the resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman program (an advocate for residents of nursing homes, board and care centers, and assisted living facilities) contact information was posted in a visible area to residents. This deficient practice had the potential to violate residents rights to file a complaint. Findings: During a review of Resident 52's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 52 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 52's diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing), hypertension (HTN-high blood pressure) and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). During a review of Resident 52's History and Physical (H&P) dated 9/9/2025, the H&P indicated Resident 52 had the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 52's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident assessment tool), dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure three of 11 sampled residents (Resident 106, Resident 25, and Resident 4) received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of care when:1. Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 2 did not clarify Resident 106's order for cholecalciferol (also known as Vitamin D3, a vitamin essential for building and maintaining strong bones and immune function) and accurately document the omission on the Medication Administration Report (MAR - a daily documentation record used by a licensed nurse to document medications and treatments given to a resident).2. Resident 25's physician order for a urinalysis (UA- lab test to check the urine for signs of disease) and culture and sensitivity (C&S- a lab test to determine the specific bacteria and what medication works best to treat it) were not carried out due to the incorrect input of the physician order and ineffective follow up, documentation, and communication between the licensed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-26 · tag F0851 — patternElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure direct care staffing information [actual, hands-on hours worked by qualified staff such as registered nurses (RN), licensed vocational nurses (LVN) and certified nursing assistants (CNA) providing direct nursing services to residents] was submitted to the Centers for Medicaid Services (CMS- federal agency responsible for regulating healthcare quality).This deficient practice had the potential to place the facility at risk of unidentified staffing issues.Findings:During a review of the Payroll Based Journal (PBJ- dataset that provides information submitted by nursing homes quarterly) Staffing Data Report dated 3/19/2026, the PBJ Staffing Data Report indicated the facility failed to submit data for quarter one (10/1/2025-12/31/2025). During a concurrent interview and record review on 3/25/2026 at 1:50 p.m. with the Administrator (ADM), the CMS Submission Report dated 2/13/2026 was reviewed. The CMS Submission Report indicated direct care staffing information was submitted for quarter two (1/1/2026-3/31/2026) on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the call light was readily accessible and within reach for one of six sampled residents (Resident 112). The call light was observed positioned behind the resident's bed, preventing immediate access. This deficient practice had the potential to significantly compromise Resident 112's safety by delaying Resident 112's ability to request assistance, thereby increasing the risk for unmet needs, injury, and adverse outcomes.Findings: During a review of Resident 112's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 112 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 112's diagnoses included falls, muscle weakness, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), schizoaffective disorder (a mental illness that can affect thoughts, mood, and behavior), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a progressive lung disease that restricts airflow causing significant breathing difficulties) and contractures (a stiffening/shortening at any…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to notify one of one sampled resident's (Resident 91) physician of the resident's preference of taking Depakote Sprinkle (an anticonvulsant medication, used to treat seizures [a sudden, uncontrolled electrical disturbance in the brain which can cause uncontrolled jerking, blank stares, and loss of consciousness] with small beads within a capsule that could be sprinkled onto soft food) capsules whole. This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 91 choking.Cross Reference F657 and F759.Findings:During a review of Resident 91's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 91 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 91's diagnoses included epilepsy (a chronic brain disorder characterized by recurrent, unprovoked seizures [a sudden, uncontrolled electrical disturbance in the brain which can cause uncontrolled jerking, blank stares, and loss of consciousness]), bipolar…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' clothing and personal belongings were protected from view and potential loss when closet doors were left uncovered without doors or adequate protective measures for three out of six sampled residents (Resident 11, Resident 25, and Resident 116). This deficient practice had the potential to create a risk for theft and compromise the residents' sense of security and homelike environment.Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 11's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 11 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 11's diagnoses included pneumonia (an infection/inflammation in the lungs), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing), Alzheimer's (a disease characterized by a progressive decline in mental abilities), and muscle weakness. During a review of Resident 11's Minimum Data Set ([MDS], a resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the correct Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR- a federally mandated screening process designed to ensure individuals with serious mental illnesses or intellectual/development disabilities receive the necessary support) Level 1 Screening was received from the general acute care hospital (GACH) for one of three sampled residents' (Resident 12).This deficient practice resulted in the failure of a more in-depth Level 2 Mental Health Evaluation not being conducted and had the potential for Resident 12 to not receive the necessary and appropriate psychiatric level treatment and evaluation in the facility.Findings:During a review of Resident 12's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 12's diagnoses included schizophrenia (a mental illness that is characterized by disturbances in thought) and major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a care plan was developed and implemented in a timely manner for three of six sampled residents (Resident 22, Resident 28, and Resident 4), who required the use of dentures and who was administered Haloperidol (an antipsychotic [a drug used for the treatment of symptoms of psychosis and other severe mental and emotional disorders]). This deficient practice had the potential to place Residents 22 and 28 at risk for impaired nutrition, oral discomfort, and difficulty with eating. This deficient practice also had the potential to place Resident 4 at risk for compromised mobility, social isolation, and pressure ulcer development (localized, pressure-related damage to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence). Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 22's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 22 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 22's diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to revise one of one sampled resident's (Resident 91) care plan to reflect Resident 91's preference of taking Depakote Sprinkle (an anticonvulsant medication, used to treat seizures [a sudden, uncontrolled electrical disturbance in the brain which can cause uncontrolled jerking, blank stares, and loss of consciousness] with small beads within a capsule that could be sprinkled onto soft food) capsules whole.This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 91 choking.Cross Reference F580 and F759.Findings:During a review of Resident 91's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 91 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 91's diagnoses included epilepsy (a chronic brain disorder characterized by recurrent, unprovoked seizures [a sudden, uncontrolled electrical disturbance in the brain which can cause uncontrolled jerking, blank stares, and loss of consciousness]),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 37 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 94) who was visually impaired was orientated to his meal tray during lunch time. This failure had the potential to put the resident at risk for serious physical harm (choking, aspiration, malnutrition, and/or burns) and negatively impacts their psychological well being, dignity, and independence Findings: During a review of Resident 94's admission Record (AR) dated 3/25/2026, the AR indicated Resident 94 was a [AGE] year-old male, admitted on [DATE], with the diagnosis that included but not limit to: legal blindness (when a person's eyesight is very poor), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a long lasting lung disease that makes it hard to breathe), muscle weakness and hypertension (high blood pressure.) During a review of Resident 94's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool) dated 2/4/2026, MDS indicated Resident 94 had severely impaired vision and needs supervision or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure their error rate was less than five percent (%) during the medication administration observation for two of five randomly selected residents (Residents 106 and 91).The outcome was four medication errors out of 27 opportunities for errors, which resulted in a medication administration error rate of 14.81%, based on the following:1. Resident 106 was given a multivitamin (dietary supplement containing a combination of essential vitamins) instead of multivitamin-minerals (multivitamin with minerals).2. Resident 106's cholecalciferol (also known as Vitamin D3, a vitamin essential for building and maintaining strong bones and immune function) was unnecessarily omitted and incorrectly documented.3. Resident 106's Colace (stool softener) refusal was inaccurately documented on the Medication Administration Record (MAR - a daily documentation record used by a licensed nurse to document medications and treatments given to a resident).4.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper cleaning and sanitization of resident-use dining equipment, and properly label and store one of one resident's (Resident 54) food item brought in from the outside. These deficient practices had the potential to result in the use of improperly cleaned dishware and placed residents at risk for exposure to bacteria and contaminants, increasing the risk of foodborne illness, infection, and compromised health and safety.Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/23/2026 at 8:40 a.m. with [NAME] 1, in the kitchen, observed the storage rack designated for clean water pitchers. Six water pitchers labeled as clean were observed with a sticky residue with previously dated labels (dated 3/21/2026 and 3/22/2026) on the lids. [NAME] 1 stated the residue of the old labels indicated the pitchers had not been thoroughly cleaned prior to being placed in the clean storage area. [NAME] 1 stated that all labels should be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Fall Risk Assessment was updated and accurately reflected the health status for two of 16 sampled residents (Resident 105 and Resident 82), and ensure the List of Residents with Special Needs and Resident Belongings List was updated to reflect upper and lower dentures were received for one of six sampled residents (Resident 28). These deficient practices had the potential to place Residents 105 and 82 at an increased risk for a fall, and resulted in the loss of Resident 28's dentures placing Resident 28 at risk for compromised nutritional intake due to impaired chewing ability, impaired communication, and increasing the potential for unmet needs and a decline in overall health and well-being. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 105's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 105 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 105's diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents' (Resident 55) nasal cannula oxygen tubing and humidifier bottle were labeled with a date.This failure had the potential to increase the risk of infection of Resident 55.Findings:During a review of Resident 55's admission Record (AR) dated 3/25/2026, the AR indicated Resident 55 was a [AGE] year-old female, admitted on [DATE], with the diagnosis that included but not limit to: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a long lasting lung disease that makes it hard to breathe), respiratory failure (a condition when the lungs cannot get enough oxygen into the body), diabetes (a condition where the body has trouble controlling the amount of sugar in the blood), and heart failure (a condition the heart is not pumping blood as well as it should.)During a review of Resident 55's Minimum Date Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool) dated 2/27/2026, MDS indicated Resident 55 is on oxygen therapy.During a review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-12-19 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespreadEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare food by methods that conserved temperatures when the lunch tray line food temperatures were as follows: 1. Quesadillas temperature measurement indicated 120 degrees Fahrenheit (°F, a degree of temperature). 2. Lasagna temperature measurement indicated 126°F . This deficient practice had the potential to place 112 of 115 facility residents who received food from the kitchen at risk of unplanned weight loss, a consequence of poor food intake from food in the kitchen. Cross reference to F812. Findings: During an observation on 12/17/2024 at 11:50 a.m., the dietary staff were observed starting the tray line service for lunch. During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/17/2024 at 12:05 p.m., in the kitchen, with [NAME] 1, a tray of quesadillas and lasagna was observed placed on the shelf away from the stove and steam table (a large metal table or container with openings that held smaller metal pans of food over hot water or steam). [NAME] 1 was observed taking the temperature of the food items…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary food storage and food preparation practices in the kitchen when food temperatures were out of range as follows: 1. Quesadillas measurement indicated 120 degrees Fahrenheit (°F, a degree of temperature). 2. Lasagna measurement indicated 126°F. This deficient practice had the potential to result in harmful bacteria growth and cross contamination (transfer of harmful bacteria from one place to another) that could lead to foodborne illness (transfer of bacteria from one object to another) in 112 of 115 medically compromised residents who received food from the kitchen. Cross reference to F804. Findings: During an observation on 12/17/2024 at 11:50 a.m., the dietary staff were observed starting the tray line service for lunch. During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/17/2024 at 12:05 p.m., in the kitchen, with [NAME] 1, a tray of quesadillas and lasagna was observed placed on the shelf away from the stove and steam table (a large metal table or container with openings that held…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-12-19 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespreadDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the garbage storage area was maintained in a sanitary manner to prevent the harborage and feeding of pests when the outside trash dumpster lids were not closed. This deficient practice had the potential to result in creating harborage and feeding of pests which could lead to diseases and increase the morbidity (the amount of disease in a population) and mortality (the state of being subject to death) among facility residents. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/17/2024 at 9:58 a.m., of the outdoor garbage storage area, with the Dietary Supervisor (DS), two trash dumpster lids were observed not closed completely. The DS stated the trash dumpster lids should be closed completely to keep flies away. The DS stated flies transported bacteria and residents might catch bacteria and get sick. During an interview on 12/17/2024 at 1:40 p.m. with the Infection Preventionist Nurse (IPN), the IPN stated the outside trash dumpster lids should be closed completely for infection control…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-19 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report abuse allegations to the State Agency (Department of Public Health), ombudsman (an advocate for residents of nursing homes, board and care centers, and assisted living facilities), and the police department for two of 24 sampled residents (Residents 88 and 259) when: 1. Responsible Party (RP) 1 informed Registered Nurse (RN) 1 that Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 2 said hurtful things to Resident 88. 2. Resident 259 informed Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 3 that CNA 2 had made him feel uncomfortable during a bed bath. These deficient practices resulted in a delay of an onsite inspection by the State Agency and had the potential for potential ongoing abuse. Cross Reference F610. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 88's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 88 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 88's diagnoses included urinary tract infection (UTI, an infection in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-19 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate abuse allegations and implement interventions to prevent further potential abuse for two of 24 sampled residents (Residents 88 and 259) when: 1. Responsible Party (RP) 1 informed Registered Nurse (RN) 1 that Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 2 had said hurtful things to Resident 88. 2. Resident 259 informed Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 3 that CNA 2 made him feel uncomfortable during a bed bath. These deficient practices had the potential to result in unidentified abuse in the facility and failure to protect residents from further potential abuse. Cross Reference F609. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 88's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 88 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 88's diagnoses included urinary tract infection (UTI, an infection in the bladder/urinary tract), type two diabetes mellitus (a disorder characterized by difficulty in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to respect the rights and provide dignity to two of six sampled residents (Resident 95 and Resident 75) by failing to: 1. Obtain a public guardian (a legally appointed person who manages the care and finances of individuals who are unable to do so for themselves) or conduct an interdisciplinary team (IDT, group of different disciplines working together towards a common goal for a resident) meeting to facilitate the care and medical treatments provided for Resident 75. 2. Follow its policy and procedure (P&P) titled Catheter - Care of, to provide a dignity bag (a bag used to cover and hold the catheter drainage/collection bag, so it is not visible) for Resident 95 who had both a left and right nephrostomy (a tube that lets urine drain from the kidney through an opening in the skin on the back) bag. This failure resulted in Resident 75 receiving medical treatment and antipsychotics (medications that affect the mind, emotions, and behavior) that had not been…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain updated informed consents (a voluntary agreement to accept treatment and/or procedures after receiving education regarding the risks, benefits, and alternatives offered) prior to the administration of psychotropic (medications that affect the mind, emotions, and behavior) medications for one out of six sampled residents (Resident 75). This failure had the potential to place Resident 75 at risk for avoidable harm from unwanted adverse effects (a harmful and undesired effect resulting from a medication or intervention) related to psychotropic medication use during the two months he was deemed to unable to make medical decisions. Cross Reference F550. Findings: During a review of Resident 75's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 75 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including schizophrenia (a mental illness that can affect thoughts, mood, and behavior), depressive disorder…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician of one of 24 sampled residents' (Resident 259) abuse allegation when Resident 259 felt uncomfortable by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 2 during a bed bath. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 259's physician being unaware of the abuse allegation and delayed any necessary care to be provided to Resident 259. Findings: During a review of Resident 259's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 259 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and on 12/11/2024 with diagnoses the included urinary tract infection (UTI, an infection in the bladder/urinary tract), sepsis (a life-threatening blood infection), and ), type two diabetes mellitus (a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing). During a review of Resident 259's Minimum Data Set ([MDS], a resident assessment tool), dated 9/26/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 259's cognition (process of thinking) was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a person-centered care plan (document that helps nurses and other team care members organize aspects of resident care) with interventions (actions a nurse takes to implement a care plan, intend to improve the resident's comfort and health) for two of 24 sampled residents (Residents 88 and 259) by failing to: 1. Develop a care plan for Resident 88 after Responsible Party (RP) 1 informed Registered Nurse (RN) 1 that Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 2 said hurtful things to Resident 88. 2. Develop a care plan for Resident 259 after Resident 259 informed Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 3 that CNA 2 had made him feel uncomfortable during a bed bath. These deficient practices had the potential to negatively affect Residents 88 and 259's physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being and had the potential to delay the delivery of necessary care and services. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 88's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a communication device at the bedside for one of six residents (Resident 17) who had aphasia (a disorder that makes it difficult to speak). This deficient practice prevented Resident 17 from communicating effectively and had the potential to delay appropriate care and treatment the resident needed. Findings: During a review of Resident 17's admission Record, dated 12/18/2024, the admission record indicated Resident 17 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 17's diagnoses included end stage renal disease (ESDR - irreversible kidney failure), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing), schizophrenia (a mental illness that is characterized by disturbances in thought), paraplegia (loss of movement and/or sensation, to some degree, of the legs), dysphasia (difficulty swallowing) and aphasia. During a review of Resident 17's History and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent the formation and/ or worsening of pressure ulcers/ injuries (localized, pressure-related damage to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence) for three of three residents (Resident 15, 36, and 94) when the follow occurred: 1. Resident 15's low air loss mattress (LALM, a mattress designed to distribute body weight over a broad surface area to help prevent skin breakdown) did not reflect resident's weight on 12/16/2024. 2. Resident 36's LALM did not reflect resident's weight on 12/16/2024. 3. Resident 94's LALM did not reflect resident's weight on 12/16/2024. These deficient practices placed Resident 15, 36, and 94 at risk for worsening condition of their exiting pressure injuries, and/ or the development of new pressure injuries. Findings: 1. During an observation on 12/16/2024 at 9:30 a.m., in Resident 15's room, Resident 15 was observed lying on a LALM. The LALM was set for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to:1. Provide services to prevent the development of septic shock for one out of six sampled residents (Resident 259), who had long-term usage of an indwelling urinary catheter (a hollow tube inserted into the bladder to drain or collect urine) by failing to ensure the following:1a. Ensure Resident 259's the urinary drainage was monitored for the presence of sediment (a buildup of particles within the catheter tubing, often caused by factors like dehydration, urinary tract infection [UTI- an infection in the bladder/urinary tract], improper catheter care, or the presence of certain bacteria that promote crystal formation), abnormal color, and foul odor, per the facility's P&P and Resident 259's care plan, for a total of six months.1b. Ensure a urine culture (a lab test that checks for bacteria in a urine sample) was performed after Resident 259's urine analysis (a lab test that provides information about the appearance, chemical composition,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to check the gastrostomy tube (GT, a surgical opening fitted with a device to allow feedings to be administered directly to the stomach common for people with swallowing problems) placement and gastric residual volume (GRV - the amount of liquid remaining in the stomach after an enteral feeding [method of feeding that uses the gastrointestinal [GI - stomach and intestines tract to deliver nutrition and calories]) for one of six residents (Resident 12). This deficient practice had the potential to cause aspiration (feeding entering the lungs), stomach irritation, vomiting, and malnutrition for Resident 12 . Findings: During a review of Resident 12's admission Record, dated 12/18/2024, the admission record indicated Resident 12 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 12's diagnoses included type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement infection control practices for two of two resident (Resident 52 and 310) when the following occurred: 1. Resident 52's nebulizer mask (a plastic cup that fit over the mouth and nose to deliver liquid medication as a mist into the lungs) was unlabeled. 2. Resident 310's nebulizer mask was unlabeled. These deficient practices placed Resident 52 and Resident 310 at risk for infection which could increase the morbidity (the amount of disease in a population) and mortality (the state of being subject to death) among residents. Findings: 1. During an observation on 12/16/2024 at 10:37 a.m., in Resident 52's room, observed an opened, unlabeled nebulizer mask at the bedside. The mask did not indicate the resident's name or date. During an observation on 12/16/2024 at 3:58 p.m., in Resident 52's room, observed an opened, unlabeled nebulizer mask at the bedside. The mask did not indicate the resident's name or date. During a review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive plan of care for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) by failing to: 1. Develop a plan of care for a resident's known behavior of biting. 2. Develop a care plan for a resident at risk for elopement (when a resident leaves or wanders in a healthcare facility against medical advice). These failures resulted in Resident 1 wandering into Resident 2's room, hitting Resident 2 on the face, attempted to bite Resident 2 on the arm, and throwing a pitcher full of water on Resident 2. Findings: A. A review of Resident 1's admission Record, indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions), anxiety (a feeling of fear, dread, and uneasiness), and abnormalities of gait (ability to walk) and mobility. A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set ([MDS]- a standardized resident assessment and care planning tool), dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to closely monitor a resident with a known history of wandering, aggression, throwing items at staff, and biting for one out of three sampled residents (Resident 1). These failures resulted in Resident 1 wandering into Resident 2's room, hitting Resident 2's face, attempted to bite Resident 2's arm, and throw a pitcher full of water at Resident 2. Findings: A. A review of Resident 1's admission Record, indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions), anxiety (a feeling of fear, dread, and uneasiness), and abnormalities of gait (ability to walk) and mobility. A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set ([MDS]- a standardized resident assessment and care planning tool), dated 5/21/2024, indicated Resident 1's cognitive skills (mental action or process of acquiring knowledge and understanding) for daily decision making was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-26 · tag F0626 — isolatedPermit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to readmit one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) from the general acute care hospital (GACH) after Resident 1 was cleared by the GACH to return to the facility on 1/25/2024. This resulted in the denial of Resident 1 ' s right to return to the facility. Finding: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes (high blood sugar), muscle weakness (a lack of strength in the muscles), dysphagia (swallowing difficulties), chronic kidney disease ([CKD] a condition in which the kidneys are damaged and cannot filter blood), and heart failure (a condition when heart doesn ' t pump enough blood for body ' s needs). During a review of Resident 1 ' s History and Physical (H&P) dated 11/27/2023. The H& P indicated Resident 1 had the capacity to make medical decisions. During a review of Resident 1 ' s…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-12-14 · tag F0576 — widespreadEnsure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to distribute incoming mail on Saturdays for nine of nine residents (Residents 27, 32, 52, 55, 65, 74, 111, 116, and 119). This failure resulted in residents waiting an extra two days for their mail received by the facility. Findings: During a group interview on 12/12/2023 at 10:50 a.m., with Residents 27, 32, 52, 55, 65, 74, 111, 116, and 119, all nine residents stated the staff in charge of distributing the mail did not work on Saturdays and Sundays, therefore, any mail that arrived on Saturday would be distributed on the following Monday. During an interview on 12/13/2023 at 11:20 a.m., with Activities Aid (AA) 1, AA 1 stated when mail arrived at the facility on Saturdays, the staff member who received it at the entrance would lock it in the cupboard. AA 1 stated once the Business Office Manager (BOM) arrived on Monday, the mail would be given to them. AA 1 stated when a resident would ask about mail on the weekend, she would let the resident know that the BOM was not there and would receive their mail on the following…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide respect and dignity to three residents out of 32 sampled residents (Resident 53, 84, 107) when: 1. A certified Nurse Attendant (CNA) answered Resident 53's call light from the hallway, screaming out loud to the resident and asking Resident 53 what he wanted. 2. Resident 84 alleged she was treated in a bad manner when the CNAs entered the resident's room to answer the call light. 3. Resident 107 felt disrespected by nursing staff. These deficient practices resulted in Residents 53, 84, and 107 to not be treated in a manner that did not promote and enhance a sense of well-being, self-worth, and dignity. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 53's admission Record (face-sheet), the admission record indicated Resident 53 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hemiplegia (a condition caused by a brain injury, that results in a varying degree of weakness, stiffness and lack of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-14 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to accommodate the needs for one of 32 sampled residents (Resident 46), who had a diagnosis of dysphagia (difficult swallowing) and was at risk for aspiration (when food, drink, or foreign objects are breathed into the lungs), and by not ensuring the call light was within reach for two of 32 sampled residents (Resident 102 and 28) by: 1. Not providing Resident 46 with a proper functioning bed. The head of the resident's bed did not go higher than 25 degrees. 2. Not following the physician's order to raise the head of the bed to 30 to 45 degrees to prevent the resident from being short of breath. 3. Not placing Resident 102's and Resident 28's call light within reach. These failures hindered Resident 46 from eating in bed, the possibility of causing Resident 46 to aspirate his food and prevent the resident from being short of breath and had the potential for Resident 102 and Resident 28 to not make their needs known in a timely manner.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-14 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately document behavior monitoring on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for one out of three residents (Resident 50). As a result, this deficient practice had the potential to affect the evaluation of psychiatric treatment and contribute to unnecessary medications. Findings: During a review of Resident 50's admission Record, the admission record indicated Resident 50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including psychosis (a severe mental condition in which thought and emotions are so affected that contact is lost with external reality), dementia (a group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning) with behavioral disturbance (a pattern of disruptive behaviors), and Parkinson's disease (a progressive disorder that affects the nervous system and the parts of the body controlled by the nerves). During a review of Resident 50's History and Physical (H&P), dated 8/15/2023, the H&P…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-14 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure licensed nurses followed their own Policy and Procedures (P&P) titled, Blood Pressure, when measuring one of four residents' (Resident 55) blood pressure (BP, the force of blood pushing against the walls of blood vessels). This failure placed Resident 55 at risk for incorrect blood pressure monitoring which could lead to adverse reactions, hospitalization, and/or death. Findings: During a review of Resident 55's admission Record, the admission record indicated Resident 55 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 55's diagnoses included hypertension (HTN - high blood pressure) and heart failure (an ongoing condition in which the heart does not pump blood as well as it should). During a review of Resident 55's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and care screening tool) dated 9/26/2023, the MDS indicated Resident 55 had coronary artery disease (damage or disease to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to assist a resident who is unable to carry out ADLs (activities of daily living) for one of 32 sampled residents (Resident 53) by: 1. Not providing oral care to Resident 53 in the last 3 consecutive days. 2. Not changing Resident 53's clothes in the last 3 consecutive days. 3. Not offering Resident 53 to get out of bed or to change his position for 3 consecutive days. 4. Not offering Resident 53 a shower on his scheduled shower day. 5. No cutting Resident 53 fingernails after the resident requested help. These deficient practices resulted in a negative impact on Resident 53's quality of life and self-esteem. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 53's admission Record (face-sheet), the admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of hemiplegia (a condition caused by a brain injury, that results in a varying degree of weakness, stiffness and lack of control in one…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-14 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one out of two sampled residents (Resident 82) received a hearing aid to effectively communicate with staff. This failure had the potential to affect Resident 82's dignity, communication with staff, and prevent the resident's needs from being met. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/11/2023 at 10:05 a.m., in Resident 82's room, Resident 82 stated, I can't hear you! upon initial interview while pointing to his right ear. When Resident 82 was asked if he could hear better with his other ear, the resident responded, I can't hear you! My hearing is bad. You have to speak louder. No hearing aid was observed in either of Resident 82's ears. Resident 82 stated that he was not sure where the hearing aid was. There was no communication board observed in Resident 82's room. During a record review of Resident 82's admission Record, the admission record indicated Resident 82 was initially admitted to the facility on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-14 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the physician's order for the removal of an intravenous catheter (IV; a soft, flexible tube placed inside a vein to administer medications or fluids) that was inserted more than 48 hours for one of one sampled resident (Resident 46). This deficient practice increased the risk for Resident 46 to develop complications and/or infection. Findings: During the review of Resident 46's admission Record (face sheet), the admission record indicated Resident 46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dysphasia (difficulty or discomfort in swallowing) and dementia (the loss of cognitive functioning, thinking, remembering, and reasoning, to such an extent that it interferes with a person's daily life and activities). During a review of Resident 46's History and Physical (H&P), the H&P indicated Resident 46 was able to make needs known but could not make medical decisions. The H&P indicated Resident 46 had a history…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-14 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately document controlled medications (medications that can cause physical and mental dependence) for one out of three sampled residents (Resident 50). This failure had the potential for Resident 50 to not receive the prescribed medication which would affect his wellbeing and increase potential for drug diversion (the illegal distribution or abuse of prescription drugs or their use for purposes not intended by the prescriber). Findings: During a review of Resident 50's admission Record, the admission record indicated the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included anxiety (a feeling of worry, nervousness, or unease). During a review of Resident 50's care plan, the care plan indicated Resident 50 had episodes of being anxious manifested by unprovoked (not caused by anything done or said) crying. The staff's interventions indicated to administer Ativan (brand name for lorazepam, a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all medications were properly stored and disposed of by: 1. Not following proper storing instructions of Humulin R insulin (a short-acting medication that starts to work 30 minutes after injection to treat high blood sugar also known as diabetes) for one out of three sampled residents (Resident 75). 2. Not abiding by its policy when disposing non-controlled medications by 2 licensed nurses. These failures had the potential to cause resident medications to be diverted (the illegal distribution or abuse of prescription drugs or their use for purposes not intended by the prescriber), misused, and can cause harm, hospitalization or even death to Resident 75 due of loss of medication efficacy (the ability for a medication to produce a desired or intended result). Findings: During a record review of Resident 75's admission Record, the admission record indicated Resident 75's diagnoses included Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar). During a record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to label one of 24 sampled residents' (Resident 369) peripheral intravenous line (IV; a soft, flexible tube placed inside a vein to administer medications or fluids) dressing with the date and time of insertion and the signature of the inserting nurse. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 369 developing an infection. Findings: During a review of Resident 369's admission Record (Face Sheet), the admission Record indicated Resident 369 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses included but not limited to cellulitis of the right and lower limb, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a group of diseases that cause airflow blockage and breathing-related problems), and type 2 diabetes mellitus. During a review of Resident 369's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], the MDS indicated Resident 369's cognition (ability to think and reason) was severely impaired. The MDS indicated Resident 369 usually made himself…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to report an abuse allegation within 2 hours for one of three residents (Resident 2). This deficient practice had the potential to result in additional harm to Resident 2 as evidenced by a bruise to the resident's left upper cheek (below the eye). Findings: During a record review of Resident 2 ' s admission Record, dated 10/31/2022, the admission Record indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 2 ' s diagnoses included dementia (a condition characterized by progressive or persistent loss of intellectual functioning, especially with impairment of memory and abstract thinking, and often with personality change, resulting from organic disease of the brain). During a record review of Resident 2 ' s Minimum Data Set ([MDS] a standardized assessment and care screening tool), dated 7/29/2023, the MDS indicated Resident 2 was severely cognitively impaired (ability to think and reason). The MDS indicated Resident 2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement their Infection prevention and control policy and procedures (P&P) by failing to: a. Ensure staff doffed (removed) personal protective equipment ([PPE] specialized clothing or equipment such as a gown, respirator and face shield worn to minimize exposure to serious illness) prior to exiting a Coronavirus Disease ([Covid 19] a highly contagious respiratory infection caused by a virus that could easily spread from person to person) isolation room (designated room to separate sick resident with a contagious illness). b. Ensure nurses maintained short and well-trimmed fingernails. c. Report the facility's Covid-19 outbreak (at least one confirmed case of Covid-19 who had resided in the facility for at least 7 days) to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) District Office. These deficient practices had the potential to result in the spread of covid-19 and infections to residents, staff and visitors. Findings: a. During a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-14 · tag F0626 — patternPermit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of three sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2) were allowed to return to the facility where they both had been living. Residents 1 and 2 were not provided the first available bed after Resident 1 and Resident 2 were cleared to return to the facility following their stay at a General Acute Care Hospital (GACH). This deficient practice resulted in Residents 1 and 2 being transferred to another facility and had the potential to negatively affect the resident ' s psychosocial well-being. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [(COPD], lung disease that causes blocked airflow from the lungs), Parkinson ' s disease (a brain disorder that causes unintended or uncontrollable movements, such as shaking, stiffness, and difficulty…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-11 · tag F0813 — isolatedHave a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its Outside Food Monitoring log which indicated hot food will be checked by Licensed Nurses for appropriateness of the temperature prior to serving to the resident, for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential to cause food borne illnesses, allergic reactions and choking to Resident 1. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's face sheet (admission record), dated 8/8/2023, the face sheet indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ([COPD], a group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe), anxiety (mental disorder that causes excessive fear and or worry, feeling nervous and breathing rapidly), dementia (a condition characterized by progressive or persistent loss of intellectual functioning that interferes with daily functioning) and obesity (excessive fat accumulation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$19,892 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $14,380 — penalty dated 2026-07-01
- $5,512 — penalty dated 2024-12-19
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to PACIFIC HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS — 15 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 1.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 2.1 | -1.1 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
The other 14 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.9★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PACIFIC HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS, INC. | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 35% | since 01/01/2019 |
| CORPORATE INTERFACE SERVICES LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/18/2024 |
| ROCKPORT ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/10/2025 |
| RECHNITZ, SHLOMO | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/09/2009 |
| ROSMAN, SHIMON | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/01/2014 |
| YACOUB, ATEF | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $294K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555130. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.